Jump to content

Persuasive writing and Young Union: Difference between pages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Psmith006 (talk | contribs)
55 edits
No edit summary
 
Broadbot (talk | contribs)
26,088 edits
m robot Adding: da:Junge Union
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Junge Union''' (''Young Christian Democrats'') or '''JU''' is the joint
{{Refimprove|date=October 2008}}
[[youth organisation]] of the two conservative [[Germany|German]] [[Political party|political parties]] [[Christian Democratic Union of Germany|CDU]] and [[Christian Social Union in Bavaria|CSU]]. To be a member one has to be between 14 and 35 years old.


==Philosophy==
'''Persuasive writing''', also known as an [[argument]], is used to convince the reader of a writer’s argument(s) relating to a debatable issue. Persuasive writing involves convincing the reader to perform an action, or it may simply consist of an argument(s) convincing the reader of the writer’s point of view. Persuasive writers employ many techniques to improve their argument and show support for their claim.
In its manifesto the JU defines itself as a [[Liberalism|liberal]], [[Conservatism|conservative]]
but [[progressivism|progressive]] organisation. From an Anglo-Saxon point of view the JU would best be described as conservative. Its policies are based on the [[Christian]] view of Man and his responsibility before [[God]]. The JU advocates [[democracy]] and [[Social market economy]]. It supports the [[European Union|European integration]] and a strong partnership with the [[United States]]. The ''Junge Union'' backs the modernisation of the political agenda within its mother parties. One central objective is a consequent reform of the [[social security system]] which faces a tough [[Demography|demographic challenge]] in the coming years.
The most important topic of the JU is education. The JU supports the elite school-type ''Gymnasium'' and manifest best education as their mayor aim. They support the idea of private schools, which are relatively rare in Germany, and want them to coexist with very well-equipped public schools.


==Well-known former members of the Junge Union==


*[[Helmut Kohl]]
*[[Edmund Stoiber]]
*[[Roland Koch]]
*[[Christian Wulff]]
*[[Peter Müller (German politician)|Peter Müller]]


==Chairpersons==
==Early Rhetoric and Persuasive Writing==
*[[Bruno Six]] ([[1947]]-[[1948]])
*[[Alfred Sagner]] ([[1948]]-[[1949]])
*[[Josef Hermann Dufhues]] ([[1949]]-[[1950]])
*[[Ernst Majonica]] ([[1950]]-[[1955]])
*[[Gerhard Stoltenberg]] ([[1955]]-[[1961]])
*[[Bert Even]] ([[1961]]-[[1963]])
*[[Egon Klepsch]] ([[1963]]-[[1969]])
*[[Jürgen Echternach]] ([[1969]]-[[1973]])
*[[Matthias Wissmann]] ([[1973]]-[[1983]])
*[[Christoph Böhr]] ([[1983]]-[[1989]])
*[[Hermann Gröhe]] ([[1989]]-[[1994]])
*[[Klaus Escher]] ([[1994]]-[[1998]])
*[[Hildegard Müller]] ([[1998]]-[[2002]])
*[[Philipp Mißfelder]] ([[2002]]- )


==International relations==
Early rhetoricians dealt with persuasive writing and oration. [[Cicero]] most notably defined persuasive writing as the grand style in his work ''[[Orator]]''.
The JU is member of the Youth of the European People's Party (YEPP), an umbrella organisation of [[Christian Democratic]] and conservative youth organisations of [[Europe]]. It works closely together with all European partner organisations but has traditionally strong ties to the neighbouring Junge Österreichische Volkspartei (JVP), youth organisation of the [[Austrian People's Party]].


==External links==
Cicero stated, ''“This eloquence has power to sway man’s mind and move them in every possible way”'' ([[Cicero]]).
*[http://www.junge-union.de/ Junge Union] - Official site (German)
*[http://www.philipp-missfelder.de/ Philipp Mißfelder] - Official site of the current JU chairman (German)
*[http://www.yepp.org/ Youth of the European People's Party] - Official site (English)


He also stated, however, that the most effective orator, or in this case, writer, uses a combination of the plain, middle, and this grand style to suit the context.


{{Germany-party-stub}}
==[[Ethos]], [[Logos]], and [[Pathos]] in Persuasive Writing==
{{youth-org-stub}}
By appealing to credibility, writers can make their claims more believable. This is called an appeal to [[ethos]], as defined by Aristotle. The writer builds on his or her [[ethos]] by writing with clarity (an important element of style) and eliminating contradictions within the text itself. The writer will be more credible to the target audience if there are no internal errors in [[syntax]] and [[mechanics]] as well as no factual errors in the subject matter.


[[Category:Youth wings of political parties in Germany]]
Writers can appeal to logic when writing to persuade using the appeal known as [[logos]]. This appeal is manifested in the supporting statements for the writer’s claim. In most cases, a successful appeal to logos requires tangible evidence, e.g. a quote from acknowledged written material. The writer will appeal to the rationality of the audience.


[[da:Junge Union]]
Possibly the most important appeal for persuasive writers is the appeal to emotions or [[pathos]]. “A successful pathetic appeal will put the audience in a suitable mood by addressing their knowledge of or feelings about the subject” (Mendelson). This can be a very effective way to win over an audience.
[[de:Junge Union]]

[[fr:Junge Union]]
'''Most persuasive writing techniques use an effective combination of all three appeals.'''
[[hr:Junge Union]]

[[la:Unio iuvenilis]]
==Traditional Structure==
[[nl:Junge Union]]

[[no:Junge Union]]
Here are the traditional parts of persuasive writing that can be used to strengthen an argument. While these do not have to be followed exactly or in this order, they are helpful in forming the structure in persuasive writing.
[[nds:Junge Union]]

* [[Exordium]], or introduction
* Narration, or background statement of the facts
* Partition, or forecast of the topics to be presented
* Conformation, or the confirmation of the piece. In contemporary English classes, this would be called the body of the text.
* Refutation, or discussion of alternatives
* Peroration, or a conclusion. It’s often helpful to tie the conclusion back to the introduction in order to strengthen your claim.

==Common Techniques<ref>Baird, Rod. A Bare-Bones Guide to Persuasive Writing. Writing 29:3 (2006):16-17.</ref>==

* Personal Appeal: Human beings are emotional; establish common ground that your audience can relate to. Also known as [[empathy]].

* Tone: The tone of the piece can alienate a reader if too harsh or sarcastic. The writer wants the reader to like them and to approve of their idea.

* Precision: Avoid lazy language, cliches, trends and jargon.

* Concession: Acknowledge opposing points of view and offer your rebuttal.

* Logic: If A equals B, and B equals C, then A must equal C. If the statements in your equation are true, then your conclusion must be true as well. A great example of logic is the [[United States Declaration of Independence]]

* Authority: Speak from personal experience, or if you have none, then provide facts, figures, and quotes from authorities to support your opinion

* Rhetorical Questioning: A rhetorical question can be phrased so that the only answer is in favor of your opinion. Ex: Dog is man's best friend. Who doesn't want a loyal best friend?

==Tips for Effective Persuasive Writing<ref>Murray, Donald M. Write to Learn. 8th ed. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth, 2005.</ref>==

* ''Develop Stance:'' Clearly explain the argument; include viewpoint(s) you personally advocate.

* ''Establish Credentials:'' Inform audience of any previous experience(s)/research that pertains to the argued point.

* ''Anticipate Opposing Arguments:'' Be aware of opposing viewpoint(s)

* ''Counter Opposing Arguments:'' Address/answer these as introduction to personal viewpoint(s)

* ''Use Reason:'' Base persuasive argument on evidence

==Organizational Patterns==

* Pro and Con Organization: Present the reasons against your opinion, then give reasons in favor of your opinion. Explain why your reasoning is superior.
* Cause and Effect Organization: Connect ideas logically by showing their cause and effect relationship. For example, if you wanted to persuade people to get a dental checkup every six months, present effects of frequent dental checkups.
* Comparison and Contrast Organization: Show similarities and differences between your opinion and others. Present factual evidence that shows why your opinion is best.
* Main Idea and Detail Organization: Provide key point or main ideas and factual details to support it.
* Order of Importance Organization: Present your argument so you progress from the least important detail to the most important or vice versa.

==Common Examples==

# '''[[Advertisements]]''' are designed as a promotion or motivation to purchase goods, services or even and idea. The advertisements may be in the form of a television commercial, billboard, spam mail, pop-up add and many other versions of mass communications. Here is an example of the possible steps in creating a persuasive ad. [http://www.xplorecommunications.com/resources/succads.htm]
# '''Political Speeches''' are by their very nature persuasive. The world has been shaped by a number of political speeches [http://www.americanrhetoric.com/top100speechesall.html].
# '''[[Essays]]''' are created to argue and convince the reader the merits of one opionion or opinions over another. There are several steps one must follow in order to write a convincing persuasive essay. <ref>"Persuasive Essay." Essay Info :: Essay Writing Center. 13 Oct. 2008
<http://essayinfo.com/essays/persuasive_essay.php>.</ref>
# '''[[Letters to the Editor]]''' Here are some things to consider before writing a letter to the editor. [http://www.hrw.org/community/action/lettertoeditor.htm]
# '''[[Public Service Announcements]]''' Click here for some examples of Public Service Announcements. [http://saloproductions.com/public-service-announcements/samples.php]

==References==
{{reflist}}

Mendelson, Michael. ''A Glossary of Rhetorical Terms''.



[[Category:Debating]]
[[Category:Writing]]

Revision as of 02:35, 14 October 2008

The Junge Union (Young Christian Democrats) or JU is the joint youth organisation of the two conservative German political parties CDU and CSU. To be a member one has to be between 14 and 35 years old.

Philosophy

In its manifesto the JU defines itself as a liberal, conservative but progressive organisation. From an Anglo-Saxon point of view the JU would best be described as conservative. Its policies are based on the Christian view of Man and his responsibility before God. The JU advocates democracy and Social market economy. It supports the European integration and a strong partnership with the United States. The Junge Union backs the modernisation of the political agenda within its mother parties. One central objective is a consequent reform of the social security system which faces a tough demographic challenge in the coming years. The most important topic of the JU is education. The JU supports the elite school-type Gymnasium and manifest best education as their mayor aim. They support the idea of private schools, which are relatively rare in Germany, and want them to coexist with very well-equipped public schools.

Well-known former members of the Junge Union

Chairpersons

International relations

The JU is member of the Youth of the European People's Party (YEPP), an umbrella organisation of Christian Democratic and conservative youth organisations of Europe. It works closely together with all European partner organisations but has traditionally strong ties to the neighbouring Junge Österreichische Volkspartei (JVP), youth organisation of the Austrian People's Party.

External links


Stub icon 1 Stub icon 2

This article about a political party in Germany is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Stub icon

This article about a youth organization is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Persuasive_writing&oldid=245138647"