Obligation to contract

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The obligation to contract (even obligation to contract ) describing legal obligation of a party , one with another party relationship to be justified. It is usually a contract .

General

Etymologically, contract derives from ( Latin contractus , " contract "). Contractual constraints limit the freedom of contract .

Since the legal institution of the obligation to contract stands in clear contradiction to the principle of private autonomy , it is only permitted in very limited exceptional cases. For example, there may be an obligation to contract in the case of a preliminary contract that has already been concluded , whereby this is justified compulsorily. Other cases are vital services that are important for commercial transactions that not every interested party would receive voluntarily from providers. One example is the electricity supply contract . In these cases there may be compulsory connection and use for public service providers. In addition, there is also a factual obligation to contract, which arises due to the legally mandatory inclusion of private service providers in what is actually purely sovereign processes (this includes the disclosure of balance sheets to the exclusively private operator of the Federal Gazette ). There are considerable constitutional concerns about the latter, which is why the inclusion of the terms and conditions may be ineffective.

history

Compulsions to contract are already known from the early Middle Ages , when it came to the transport of pilgrims to the Holy Land . The rotting regulations of the Middle Ages obliged the carters, who were united in rotters, to transport, even if in some cases only against prepayment of the freight . In English law in the Middle Ages there was the doctrine of services for certain professions that they were obliged to offer their services publicly ( English common calling ). This was especially true carrier ( english carrier ) such as railways or for forging , Schneider or innkeepers ( English inn keeper ). The obligation to contract is expressly stated in the hand-held festival from the year 1400 of Duke Albrecht of Austria for the tailors' guild in Vienna.

An Oldenburgian Fuhrordnung from 1706 also provided for mandatory contracting for drivers. The Prussian law on railway undertakings of November 1838 obliged the railway to carry freight, which was incorporated into the ADHGB in May 1861 (Art. 422 ADHGB). From 1894, the obligation to carry also extended to passenger transport. At the end of the 19th century there was already a considerable number of legal norms that mandated the obligation to contract.

The USA declared oil pipelines to be public transport ( English common carriers ) by the Hepburn Act of 1906 and made them compulsory. In France , pipelines are made compulsory by Decree No. 59–645 of May 16, 1959. In 1962, the English Transport Act eliminated the obligation to carry goods and people. In his habilitation thesis in 1920, Hans Carl Nipperdey defined the obligation to contract as “the obligation imposed on a legal entity without being bound by his will in the interests of a beneficiary to conclude a contract with him or her that is to be determined by an impartial party”. In December 1939, taxis and regular transport companies were obliged to carry. Since July 1964 there has been a general obligation to carry air traffic on scheduled services.

Cases of legal obligation to contract

The obligation to contract is required by law in some areas of law:

In principle, the obligation to contract with state-owned companies that represent a monopoly can also consist of an overall analogy to the statutory provisions (e.g. according to Section 36 of the Energy Industry Act or Section 5 (2) of the PflVG and others).

Legal consequences

If the provider refuses to enter into a contract in the event of an obligation to contract, this can constitute immoral damage which, according to § 826 BGB , obliges to pay damages . For this, however, a monopoly-like position of power must exist, so that the vital good or interest cannot be procured or safeguarded in any other way (without special expenses). Furthermore, there must be no arbitrariness in violation of Art. 3 GG . As a legal consequence , the acceptance of the contract offer is fictitious after the restitution in kind .

International

In Switzerland , too, the freedom to enter into a contract is restricted by contractual or legal obligations to conclude a contract. A contract obligation presupposes a judgment of the Federal Supreme Court (BG) of May 2002 that an entrepreneur offers his goods or services in general and publicly; the purely private exchange of goods is exempted from the obligation to contract. Second, the obligation to contract can only relate to goods and services that are part of normal needs. This includes goods and services that are available to practically everyone today and that are used in everyday life. Thirdly, an obligation to contract can only be assumed if the interested party lacks reasonable alternatives to satisfy his normal needs due to the strong position of the provider. Such a power constellation can be assumed if either only a single provider can be reached adequately, or if all providers in question are equally negative towards the interested party. Fourth, an obligation to contract can only be assumed if the entrepreneur is unable to provide any objectively justified reasons for refusing to conclude a contract. In the judgment, the BG advocated the Post's obligation to contract outside the competition services. There are legal obligations to conclude a contract for passenger transport (Art. 12 Federal Law on Passenger Transport , PBG; SR 745.1), such as the SBB's obligation to conclude a transport contract with passengers. Art. 11 Telecommunications Act (LTC; SR 784.10) contains the obligation of the dominant provider to interconnect. There are contractual obligations to conclude a contract with the preliminary contract (Art. 22 Paragraph 1 OR ) and the framework agreement.

In Austria , the Supreme Court (OGH) ruled in September 1971 that there is an obligation to contract wherever the factual superiority of a participant with merely formal parity gives him the possibility of "outside determination" over others, especially in a monopoly position . The holder of a monopoly position must have a good (objective) reason for refusing to conclude a contract if it is reasonable for him to conclude a contract. Accordingly, companies that have to supply the public with essential goods and services also have monopoly positions, especially transport and utility companies such as railways, trams, road administrations, post offices, electricity companies, waterworks, buses, etc. The public depends on them serve. For these monopoly companies there is therefore an obligation to contract. The obligation to contract becomes invalid if it is objectively justified.

The common law (the obligation to contract english obligation to contract ) known to the Middle Ages. Above all, it affects transport companies ( English common carriers ) who have to fulfill a general transport obligation ( English common carriage ).

literature

  • Jan Busche: Private autonomy and compulsion to contract (= Jus privatum . Volume 40). Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 1999, ISBN 3-16-147216-0 (also: Berlin, Freie Univ., Habil.-Schr., 1998).

Individual evidence

  1. Otto Palandt / Jürgen Ellenberger, BGB Commentary , 73rd edition, 2014, introduction before Section 145, marginal no. 8th
  2. Franz Bydlinski , On the basic dogmatic questions of the compulsory contract , in: AcP 180, 1980, p. 3
  3. Jürgen Basedow, Der Transportvertrag , 1987, p. 193
  4. ^ Brian Simpson, A History of the Common Law of Contract , 1975, pp. 229 ff.
  5. ^ Hermann Alexander von Berlepsch, Chronicle of Trades , Volume II, 1850, p. 226
  6. John Biermann, legal coercion to contract , in: JherJb Volume 32, 1893, pp 267 et seq.
  7. Industrieverlag of Hernhaussen KG (ed.): Petroleum and coal , Volume 13, 1960, p 522
  8. Jürgen Basedow, The Transport Contract: Studies on the Adjustment of Private Law on Regulated Markets , 1987, p. 214 ff.
  9. Hans Carl Nipperdey, Mandatory contract and dictated contract , 1920, p. 7
  10. Peter Salje, Energy Industry Act, 1st edition 2006, § 17 Rn 10 ff.
  11. ^ Danner, Wolfgang, 1939- Theobald, Christian: Energy law: Energy industry law with ordinances, EU directives, legal materials, association agreements; Laws and ordinances on energy saving and environmental protection as well as other legal regulations relevant to the energy industry; Comment. tape 1 . Beck, April 2018, OCLC 835059050 , § 17 EnWG Rn 81 .
  12. Stephan Brinkmeier, Mandatory contracting in water management , 2002, p. 268
  13. Stephan Brinkmeier, Mandatory contracting in water management , 2002, p. 305
  14. ^ BGH, judgment of April 6, 2005, Az .: VIII ZR 260/04
  15. FAZ of December 10, 2009, consumers pay for oversupply of green electricity
  16. ^ BG, judgment of May 7, 2002, Az .: 4C. 297/2001, BGE 80 II 26 E. 4c p. 45
  17. BGE 129 III 35 p. 47
  18. ^ OGH, judgment of September 16, 1971, Az .: 1 Ob 227/71
  19. ^ Franz Gschnitzer, Law of Obligations, General Part , 1966, p. 7
  20. ^ OGH, judgment of April 12, 2011, Az .: 4 Ob 222 / 10s
  21. Ernst Joachim Mestmäcker / Helmut Gröner / Jürgen Basedow, The Gas Industry in the Internal Market , 1990, p. 171