Herbert Riehl-Heyse

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Herbert Riehl-Heyse after a lecture in Munich in 1995

Herbert Riehl-Heyse (* October 2, 1940 in Altötting as Herbert Riehl ; † April 23, 2003 in Eichenau ) was a German journalist and author .

Life

Herbert Riehl was born on October 2, 1940 in Altötting. After the death of his father, the warehouse manager Hans Riehl, who was shot by the SS on April 28, 1945 during the civil murders of Altötting , his mother Karolina Maria Riehl, nee. Spindler, who raise four children (older brother Hans , his two older sisters Marianne and Hildegard and Herbert) alone. After graduating from high school in Burghausen , Riehl-Heyse first studied law and passed both state law exams. He took his first steps as a journalist in 1968 as an editor at Münchner Merkur . In order to avoid confusion with his brother Hans, who had been the news editor there since 1962, he added the maiden name of his wife to his name (Herbert Riehl-Heyse). In 1971 he switched to the Süddeutsche Zeitung . As a senior editor and columnist (among other things in the side light ) he shaped the style of the newspaper with his subtle satire and irony. At the beginning of 1989 he became editor-in-chief of Stern magazine, which he left after four months and returned to the Süddeutsche Zeitung.

Riehl-Heyse was also the author of books in which he mainly examined the area of ​​tension between politics and the media. He succumbed to longstanding cancer at the age of 62.

On April 27, 2005, the Herbert Riehl Heyse Prize was awarded to him for the first time .

About subjectivity & objectivity in journalism (quote)

Riehl-Heyse: "I do not believe at all that the public task of the daily newspaper is inevitably linked to so-called objectivity - on the contrary, if I understand this task of the press correctly, it consists of various functions: information, articulation, Control function. All three would not be fulfilled by a newspaper, the main principle of which would be the production of complete objectivity, mainly because it shows the reader that there is chemically pure objectivity, that the world functions exactly as it appears in such newspapers as a message. "

Therefore, “I am sure that the intentional subjectivity of the descriptor is more helpful and honest to the reader. More helpful because in this way he can learn things that could not be included in an 'objective' message just out of sheer caution, more honest because the author does not even try to give the impression that he is writing the only true, valid story about it or that political, cultural, social process. In this sense, it would be ideal if the reader knew exactly at the end of the article that he had not read anything other than the very personal view of a certain writer, and that he nevertheless found it useful to deal with this view. "

(Herbert Riehl-Heyse quoted from Petra E. Dorsch: Objectivity through Subjectivity? A conversation with the reporter Herbert Riehl-Heyse. In: Wolfgang R. Langenbucher : Journalismus & Journalismus. Munich 1980, pages 97-105, here page 100f.)

Awards

Works

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. ^ Peter Becker: April 28, 1945 in Altötting. (PDF) The difficult handling of our history. City of Altötting, April 28, 2005, archived from the original on June 26, 2018 ; Retrieved on November 18, 2018 (address at the commemoration of the city of Altötting on the 60th anniversary of the events of April 28, 1945).
  2. Mourning for journalist legend Herbert Riehl-Heyse , Spiegel Online from April 23, 2003, accessed on November 26, 2013