worldview

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nuvola apps korganizer.svg This article has been registered in the quality assurance philosophy . Articles that turn out to be not relevant enough or that do not reach a sufficiently acceptable level in the medium term can ultimately also be proposed for deletion. Please help to remedy the shortcomings in this article and please take part in the discussion ! Please do not remove this notice without consultation!

The world view (Latin imago mundi ) is the idea of ​​the tangible reality as a whole, which is more than the sum of its parts. In a narrower sense, it describes a model of the visible world. A more objective and theoretical accent can prevail over a subjective and practically understood " world view ".

Concept history

The first evidence of the German expression is the translation by Martianus Capella , De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii by Notker . There the Latin forma ideaque mundi is translated as uuerlt-pilde and thus refers in a platonic sense to a carved image that stands for the ideas whose realizations the finite world depicts.

Worldviews in the sense of cosmological ideas

The Nebra Sky Disc
Geocentric view of the world in the Middle Ages from Schedel's world chronicle
Heliocentric worldview

The question of how the world as a whole is structured already preoccupied people in prehistoric times. The Nebra Sky Disc from the Bronze Age is the oldest representation of the sky .

The Babylonian worldview shaped the conception of the world in antiquity. Among other things, it was taken over into the Jewish tradition and is therefore handed down to us in the first account of creation in the Old Testament . The earth is therefore a flat disk , which is surmounted by a heavenly vault (the firmament ). The heavenly bodies are "lights" that are firmly attached to the firmament. The land masses of the earth are surrounded by an ocean. Outside the sky dome is also water.

However, this worldview was refuted in antiquity and the spherical shape of the earth was recognized. Aristotle reasoned conclusively in his work On Heaven why the earth must be a sphere. Eratosthenes was the first to succeed in calculating the circumference of the earth from astronomical observations. However, in ancient Greece and based on it until the end of the Middle Ages, it was believed that the earth was in the center of the world. This geocentric view of the world , founded by Claudius Ptolemy , described the orbits of the sun, moon and stars as epicycles . It agreed well with the observations but was very complicated.

Nicolaus Copernicus recognized that the orbital calculations are considerably simplified if one assumes that the focus is not on the earth but on the sun. However, since this heliocentric view of the world was in contradiction to the teaching of the Catholic Church at the time, it was rejected by it. Tycho Brahe developed a world view (see tychonic world model ) in which the earth was the center. The planets did not circle around the earth, but around the sun, which in turn moved around the earth. Johannes Kepler was able to use Brahe's observational data to prove that the heliocentric worldview was correct. However, he also recognized that the planetary orbits were not circles - as Copernicus assumed - but ellipses. Galileo Galilei supported Kepler's laws with his observations and defended the heliocentric worldview very aggressively, which brought him into conflict with the church. He explained the obvious discrepancy between the words of the Bible and scientific knowledge by saying, “The purpose of the Holy Spirit is to teach us how to get to heaven, not how heaven moves.” Since then, this has become emancipated scientific worldview ever further from biblical ideas.

Isaac Newton was able to give a physical explanation for the shape of the planetary orbits with his theory of gravity . At that time, the stars were still considered unchangeable (hence the name fixed stars ). Until the 20th century, nothing changed in the idea of ​​a never-ending infinite universe . Even Albert Einstein added a cosmological constant to his general theory of relativity in order to save the worldview that had prevailed until then. He later described this trick as “the greatest donkey”, because astronomical observations by Edwin Hubble and theoretical considerations by Alexander Friedmann made it clear that the cosmos is not static, but is actually expanding . This immediately led to the realization that the world did not exist for infinite times, but rather emerged from a singularity about 13.7 billion years ago , the Big Bang .

While in ancient times the earth was still in the center of the worldview, according to today's ideas it is only a very small planet of an ordinary star in a perfectly average spiral galaxy . The fact that the conditions here seem so perfectly set up for the development of life is explained by the anthropic principle : “Only because the conditions were favorable for the development of intelligent life can we think about our development today, otherwise we would not be here . "

Giordano Bruno's (1548–1600) postulate that there is no center of the world, that the world is neither geocentric nor heliocentric, but that all stars are distant suns, had an impact on the medieval social order. The previous world view of a hierarchically ordered world (nobility (kings) and clergy (popes) at the top / center of the hierarchy, simple people (peasants, craftsmen) at the bottom of the hierarchy) began to falter and was finally replaced by the idea that all people are equal ( Enlightenment , 17th / 18th century).

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881–1955), French Jesuit, who considers biological evolution to be compatible with religious ideas, advocated in The Multiplicity of Inhabited Worlds (1953) that there must be millions of humanities scattered through the heavens. Teilhard said literally: “Based on what we know today about the number of worlds and their inner evolution, the idea of ​​a single hominated planet within the universe has in fact already become almost as unthinkable as one without genetic relationships to the other living beings The anthropomorphic centrism often assumed by Teilhard is a misinterpretation of his point-omega theory, which never referred to humans, but always to life in the entire cosmos. Whether this type of (anthropomorphic) centrism is valid - it is called into question by various quarters ( Konrad Lorenz (1903–1989), The Eight Deadly Sins of Civilized Humanity (1973)) - is controversial. In any case, the Seti project is currently looking for extraterrestrial intelligent life.

Worldviews in connection with religious ideas

The oldest worldview that has come down to us in this way is that of religion in the Paleolithic , as it is presented in cave and rock paintings , burials and idols . Already in the Neolithic there was a massive change due to the new agrarian and nomadic shepherd economy. The city-states that are now emerging then develop these worldviews further up to the Bronze Age and the territorial states that then emerged for the first time. In doing so, they are based on the now increasingly expanding knowledge of astronomy and other developing natural sciences and become part of the increasingly systematized and politically established religions and the priesthood developing in them , while also developing philosophical systems (e.g. in ancient Greece). The development over antiquity, the Middle Ages and the modern age as well as in the corresponding cultural phases in the non-European area is from now on mainly determined by religion and power politics. This is true until very recently with the worldviews on which the ideologies are based, which are now often dominated by philosophical elements ( Marxism , capitalism , materialism , etc.), after the religious representatives exercised their authority of interpretation after the end of the Middle Ages parallel to the development of the modern Science and technology have gradually lost. The often backward-looking worldviews of modern sects or esotericism , but also of orthodox Islam and Judaism, represent a counter-development .

See also

literature

  • Philipp Billion et al. (Ed.): Weltbilder im Mittelalter / Perceptions of the World in the Middle Ages. Bernstein, Bonn 2009, ISBN 978-3-939431-19-0 .
  • Roman Herzog : Early States. Origins and forms of rule. 2nd Edition. Verlag CH Beck, Munich 1998, ISBN 3-406-42922-X .
  • Ernst R. Sandvoss: Prometheus' great moments . From the worldview to the world model. Insel Verlag, Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig 1996, ISBN 3-458-16813-3 .
  • Konrad Stock, Michael Moxter u. a .: Art. world / worldview / worldview. In: Theologische Realenzyklopädie 35 (2003), pp. 536–611 (overview with a philosophical-theological and historical focus) .
  • The New Encyclopedia Britannica . 15th edition. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., Chicago 1993, ISBN 0-85229-571-5 .
  • Dieter Zeller (ed.): Religion and worldview. Marburg Religious Studies, Volume 2, Lit-Verlag, Münster / Hamburg / London 2002, ISBN 3-8258-6294-1 .
  • Georg Steer: Imagines mundi texts as a contribution to the formation of a lay worldview in the late Middle Ages. In: Norbert Richard Wolf (ed.): Knowledge-organizing and knowledge-imparting literature in the Middle Ages. Perspectives on their exploration. Wiesbaden 1987 (= knowledge literature in the Middle Ages. Volume 1), pp. 23–33.

Web links

Wiktionary: Weltbild  - explanations of meanings, word origins, synonyms, translations

Individual evidence

  1. dtv lexicon in 20 volumes, Brockhaus, Munich 1995.
  2. See, for example, Werner Stegmaier : Art. Weltbild, Weltorientierung , in: Evangelisches Kirchenlexikon , Vol. 4/11, p. 1257 and with reference to Wilhelm Dilthey H. Thomé: Art. Weltbild , in: Historical Dictionary of Philosophy , Vol. 12, 460-463, p. 461.
  3. Cf. Thomé, lc, 460.
  4. Theologische Realenzyklopädie , Vol. 35, de Gruyter, 2003, ISBN 3-11-017781-1 , p. 575ff Google book search , accessed on January 16, 2015.
  5. See also Fritz Krafft : Nicolaus Copernicus. Astronomy and the worldview at the turn of the modern age. In: Hartmut Boockmann, Bernd Moeller , Karl Stackmann (eds.): Life lessons and world designs in the transition from the Middle Ages to the modern age. Politics - Education - Natural History - Theology. Report on colloquia of the commission to research the culture of the late Middle Ages 1983 to 1987 (= treatises of the Academy of Sciences in Göttingen: philological-historical class. Volume III, No. 179). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen 1989, ISBN 3-525-82463-7 , pp. 283-335.
  6. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin , The plurality of inhabited worlds. New York, June 5, 1953 (10, 274f.).
  7. Britannica, 16, pp. 763ff; Herzog, pp. 74ff, 78ff.