List of civilian nuclear accidents: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 63: Line 63:


==2000s==
==2000s==
*[[April 10]], [[2003]] — INES Level 3 - [[Paks]], [[Hungary]] - Fuel rod damaged
*[[April 10]], [[2003]] — Damaged fuel rods spilled spent fuel pellets to the bottom of a tank of heavy water. Chemicals were added to the tank to control criticality and absorb iodine-131. [[Paks Nuclear Power Plant]], Hungary. Rated INES-3. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137875,00.html], [http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/journalist/story/0,7792,1347615,00.html]
:*Partially spent fuel rods undergoing cleaning in a tank of heavy water ruptured and spilled fuel pellets at [[Paks Nuclear Power Plant]]. It is suspected that inadequate cooling of the rods during the cleaning process combined with a sudden influx of cold water [[Thermal_shock|thermally shocked]] fuel rods causing them to split. Boric acid was added to the tank to prevent the loose fuel pellets from achieving criticality. Ammonia and hydrazine were also added to absorb iodine-131. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137875,00.html], [http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/journalist/story/0,7792,1347615,00.html]
*[[April 19]], [[2005]] — [[Sellafield]], UK. Twenty metric tons of uranium and 160 kilograms of plutonium dissolved in 83,000 liters of nitric acid leaked over several months from a cracked pipe into a stainless steel sump chamber at the [[Thorp nuclear fuel reprocessing plant]]. The partially processed spent fuel was drained into holding tanks outside the plant. [http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?sectionCode=132&storyCode=2029958].

*November [[2005]] — Tritium contamination of groundwater was discovered at [[Exelon]]'s Braidwood station.[http://www.exeloncorp.com/news/pressrelease/powergen/pr+2006+03+14.htm] Later, in March, 2006, Attorney General Lisa Madigan and Will County State’s Attorney James Glasgow announced that they were filing a lawsuit against [[Exelon]] because of six such leaks, demanding that the utility provide substitute water supplies to residents although no well outside company property shows levels that exceed drinking water standards. The lawsuit is a class-action suit representing two communities roughly two miles away from the plant and not including the closest community to the plant.<ref name="truthout">{{Cite web|url=http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/58/18461|title=Nuclear Reactors Found to Be Leaking Radioactive Water|accessdate=2006-03-17|publisher=TruthOut|year=2006|format=HTML}}</ref><ref name="illattgen">{{Cite web|url=http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/pressroom/2006_03/20060316.html|title=Madigan, Glasgow File Suit for Radioactive Leaks at Braidwood Nuclear Plant|accessdate=2006-03-17|publisher=Illinois Attorney General|year=2006|format=HTML}}</ref> According to the [[Nuclear Regulatory Commission|NRC]], "The inspection determined that public health and safety has not been adversely affected and the dose consequence to the public that can be attributed to current onsite conditions is negligible with respect to NRC regulatory limits." However, the chairman of the NRC, said, "They're going to have to fix it."
*[[April 19]], [[2005]] — INES Level 3 - [[Sellafield]], UK - Nuclear material leak
*[[March 6]], [[2006]] — [[Nuclear Fuel Services]] Erwin Plant in [[Erwin, Tennessee]] (USA) had a spill of 35 liters of highly enriched uranium solution. The danger was that this solution could have pooled in an elevator shaft sump and achieved criticality. The incident entailed a seven-month shutdown and a required public hearing on the licensing of the plant.[http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2007_register&docid=fr04my07-111] [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/05/us/06cnd-nuke.html]
:*Twenty metric tons of uranium and 160 kilograms of plutonium dissolved in 83,000 liters of nitric acid leaked over several months from a cracked pipe into a stainless steel sump chamber at the [[Thorp nuclear fuel reprocessing plant]]. The partially processed spent fuel was drained into holding tanks outside the plant. [http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?sectionCode=132&storyCode=2029958].

*November [[2005]] — INES Level needed - [[Braidwood]], [[Illinois]] - Nuclear material leak
*:Tritium contamination of groundwater was discovered at [[Exelon]]'s [[Braidwood_Nuclear_Generating_Station|Braidwood station]]. Groundwater off site remains within safe drinking standards though the [[Nuclear Regulatory Commission|NRC]] is requiring the plant to correct any problems related to the release.

*[[March 6]], [[2006]] — INES Level needed - [Erwin, Tennessee]] - Nuclear material leak
:*Thirty-five liters of a highly enriched uranium solution leaked during transfer into a lab at [[Nuclear Fuel Services]] Erwin Plant. The incident caused a seven-month shutdown and a required public hearing on the licensing of the plant.[http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2007_register&docid=fr04my07-111] [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/05/us/06cnd-nuke.html]


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 22:41, 29 September 2007

This article lists notable civilian accidents involving nuclear material. Military accidents are listed at list of military nuclear accidents. For a general discussion of both civilian and military accidents, see nuclear and radiation accidents.

Scope of this article

In listing civilian nuclear accidents, the following criteria have been followed:

  1. There must be well-attested and substantial health damage, property damage or contamination.
  2. The damage must be related directly to radioactive material, not merely (for example) at a nuclear power plant.
  3. To qualify as "civilian", the nuclear operation/material must be principally for non-military purposes.
  4. The event should involve fissile material, fission or a reactor.

1950s

  • A reactor shutoff rod failure, combined with several operator errors, led to a major power excursion of more than double the reactor's rated output at AECL's NRX reactor. The operators purged the reactor's heavy water moderator, and the reaction stopped in under 30 seconds. A cover gas system failure led to hydrogen explosions, which severely damaged the reactor core. The fission products of approximately 30 kg of uranium were released through the reactor stack. Irradiated light-water coolant leaked from the damaged coolant circuit into the reactor building; some 4,000 cubic meters were pumped via pipeline to a disposal area to avoid contamination of the Ottawa River. Subsequent monitoring of surrounding water sources revealed no contamination. No immediate fatalities or injuries resulted from the incident; a 1982 followup study of exposed workers showed no long-term health effects. Future U.S. President Jimmy Carter, then a nuclear engineer in the US Navy, was among the cleanup. crew.[1][2]
  • Due to inadequate cooling a damaged uranium fuel rod caught fire and was torn in two as it was being removed from the core at the NRU reactor. The fire was extinguished, but not before radioactive combustion products contaminated the interior of the reactor building and to a lesser degree, an area surrounding the laboratory site. Over 600 people were employed in the clean-up.[3][4]

1960s

  • A sodium cooling system malfunction caused a partial meltdown at the Enrico Fermi demonstration nuclear breeder reactor. The accident was attributed to a zirconium fragment that obstructed a flow-guide in the sodium cooling system. Two of the 105 fuel assemblies melted during the incident, but no contamination was recorded outside the containment vessel. [6]
  • Graphite debris partially blocked a fuel channel causing a fuel element to melt and catch fire at the Chapelcross nuclear power station. Contamination was confined to the reactor core. The core was repaired and restarted in 1969, operating until the plants shutdown in 2004.[7] [8].
  • A total loss of coolant lead to a power excursion and explosion of an experimental nuclear reactor. The underground location of this reactor acted like a containment building and prevented any outside contamination. The cavern was heavily contaminated and was sealed. No injuries or fatalities resulted. [9][10]

1970s

  • Operators neglected to remove moisture absorbing materials from a fuel rod assembly before loading it into the reactor at power plant A-1. The accident resulted in damaged fuel integrity, extensive corrosion damage of fuel cladding and release of radioactivity into the plant area. The plant was decommissioned following this accident. [11]
  • Equipment failures and worker mistakes contributed to a loss of coolant and a partial core meltdown at the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor. This is the worst commercial nuclear accident in the United States. While the reactor was extensively damaged on-site radiation exposure was under 100 millirems (less than annual exposure due to natural sources), with exposure of 1 millirem (10 µSv) to approximately 2 million people. There were no fatalities. Follow up radiological studies predict at most one long-term cancer fatality. [12][13][14]

1980s

  • More than 100 workers were exposed to doses of up to 155 millirem per day radiation during repairs of a nuclear power plant, violating the company's limit of 100 millirems (1 mSv) per day. [15]
  • An operator error during a fuel plate reconfiguration in an experimental test reactor led to an excursion of 3×1017 fissions at the RA-2 facility. The operator absorbed 2000 rad (20 Gy) of gamma and 1700 rad (17 Gy) of neutron radiation which killed him two days later. Another 17 people outside of the reactor room absorbed doses ranging from 35 rad (0.35 Gy) to less than 1 rad (0.01 Gy).[16] pg103[17]
  • A mishandled reactor safety test led to an uncontrolled power excursion, causing a severe steam explosion, meltdown and release of radioactive material at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant located approximately 100 kilometers north-northwest of Kiev. Approximately fifty fatalities resulted from the accident and the immediate aftermath most of these being cleanup personnel. An additional nine fatal cases of thyroid cancer in children in the Chernobyl area have been attributed to the accident. The explosion and combustion of the graphite reactor core spread radioactive material over much of Europe. 100,000 people were evacuated from the areas immediately surrounding Chernobyl in addition to 300,000 from the areas of heavy fallout in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. An "Exclusion Zone" was created surrounding the site encompassing approximately 1,000 mi² (3,000 km²) and deemed off-limits for human habitation for an indefinite period. Several studies by governments, UN agencies and environmental groups have estimated the consequences and eventual number of casualties. Their findings are subject to controversy. See Chernobyl disaster.
  • May 4, 1986 – INES Level needed - Hamm-Uentrop, Germany - Fuel element damaged
  • A spherical fuel pebbles became lodged in the pipe used to deliver fuel elements to the reactor at an experimental 300-megawatt THTR-300 HTGR. Attempts by an operator to dislodge the fuel pebble damaged its cladding, releasing radiation detectable up to two kilometers from the reactor. [18]
  • Operators disabled three of six cooling pumps to to test emergency shutoffs. Instead of the expected automatic shutdown a fourth pump failed causing excessive heating which damaged ten fuel rods. The accident was attributed to sticky relay contacts and generally poor construction in the Soviet-built reactor. [19]

1990s

  • A pressure buildup led to an explosive mechanical failure in a 34 cubic meter stainless steel reaction vessel buried in a concrete bunker under building 201 of the radiochemical works at the Tomsk-7 Siberian Chemical Enterprise plutonium reprocessing facility. The vessel contained a mixture of concentrated nitric acid, uranium (8757 kg), plutonium (449 g) along with a mixture of radioactive and organic waste from a prior extraction cycle. The explosion dislodged the concrete lid of the bunker and blew a large hole in the roof of the building, releasing approximately 6 GBq of Pu 239 and 30 TBq of various other radionuclides into the environment. The contamination plume extended 28 km NE of building 201, 20 km beyond the facility property. The small village of Georgievka (pop. 200) was at the end of the fallout plume, but no fatalities, illnesses or injuries were reported. The accident exposed 160 on-site workers and almost two thousand cleanup workers to total doses of up to 50 mSv (the threshold limit for radiation workers is 100 mSv per 5 years)[20]. [21]
  • June, 1999 — INES Level needed - Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan - Control rod malfunction
  • Operators attempting to insert one control rod during an inspection neglected procedure and instead withdrew three causing a 15 minute uncontrolled sustained reaction at the number 1 reactor of Shika Nuclear Power Plant. The Hokuriku Electric Company who owned the reactor did not report this incident and falsified records, covering it up until March, 2007. [22]
  • Workers put uranyl nitrate solution containing about 16.6 kg of uranium, which exceeded the critical mass, into a precipitation tank at a uranium reprocessing facility in Tokai-mura northeast of Tokyo, Japan. The tank was not designed to dissolve this type of solution and was not configured to prevent eventual criticality. Three workers were exposed to (neutron) radiation doses in excess of allowable limits. Two of these workers died. 116 other workers received lesser doses of 1 msV or greater though not in excess of the allowable limit. For more details, see Tokaimura nuclear accident and 5 yen coin. [23] [24] [25]

2000s

  • Partially spent fuel rods undergoing cleaning in a tank of heavy water ruptured and spilled fuel pellets at Paks Nuclear Power Plant. It is suspected that inadequate cooling of the rods during the cleaning process combined with a sudden influx of cold water thermally shocked fuel rods causing them to split. Boric acid was added to the tank to prevent the loose fuel pellets from achieving criticality. Ammonia and hydrazine were also added to absorb iodine-131. [26], [27]
  • Twenty metric tons of uranium and 160 kilograms of plutonium dissolved in 83,000 liters of nitric acid leaked over several months from a cracked pipe into a stainless steel sump chamber at the Thorp nuclear fuel reprocessing plant. The partially processed spent fuel was drained into holding tanks outside the plant. [28].
  • November 2005 — INES Level needed - Braidwood, Illinois - Nuclear material leak
    Tritium contamination of groundwater was discovered at Exelon's Braidwood station. Groundwater off site remains within safe drinking standards though the NRC is requiring the plant to correct any problems related to the release.
  • March 6, 2006 — INES Level needed - [Erwin, Tennessee]] - Nuclear material leak
  • Thirty-five liters of a highly enriched uranium solution leaked during transfer into a lab at Nuclear Fuel Services Erwin Plant. The incident caused a seven-month shutdown and a required public hearing on the licensing of the plant.[29] [30]

See also

References and external links