<!-- Follow these three steps to fill out this form: -->
<!-- Follow these three steps to fill out this form: -->
Line 2,546:
Line 2,548:
[[Category:Articles for creation templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Articles for creation templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
</noinclude>
</noinclude>
<br />[[Image:Symbol declined.svg|20px]] '''Declined'''. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|not reliable]] per the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability policy]]. Please provide '''reputable, third-party''' sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the [[WP:Verifiability|verifiability]] of the submission as well as its [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]]. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 11:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
<!--Template:Afc b (start)--></div>
|-
| style="text-align:center;" | ''This is an archived discussion. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>''
|}<!--Template:Afc b (end)-->
== Otay Mesa Road ==
== Otay Mesa Road ==
Revision as of 11:57, 26 February 2008
Alex Stanko
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Redirect created. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! Tiptoetytalk 03:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
colby o'donis
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
colby o'donis sang the track, what you got which is featured and produced by akon. he stated he is an open homosexual who is looking for a partner. rumours suggested akon was possibly a prime candidate but as akon is currently dating t-pain, sources have began to reject this romour.
also, it has been suggested he can pleasure himself in the mean time, until akon breaks up with his chocklate love, tpain.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Yngvarr(c) 01:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
55 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Mountain Resorts, CA
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Academic Team
Top Players
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Ryan "J-Work" Hanneken [1]
Nick "The Brain" Faust [2]
Mike "Dick Nasty" Dickert [3] Declined. This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the speedy deletion criteria A7 and/or guidelines on biographies. Please provide more information on why the person or group is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, and cite reliable, published third-party sources, so that the information in the article is verifiable. Thank you. Tiptoetytalk 03:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Players that Couldn't Hack it.
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Jake "J-Town" Lerman [4]
Gabe "The Blob" Neff [5]
Leshney? [6]
Redirect created. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! Tiptoetytalk 03:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
www.Phatact.com
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Phatact.com
Www.Phatact.com is a website created by Dustin Grissom. The website has many hits and is created by only a 12 year old boy.
On his website, he has videos that recieve positive views weekly and his own chat service and games.
New games
Starting Q2 2008 Phatact.com is recieving all new games, over 40 to be precise, this is stated on the homepage.
Declined. This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. See the speedy deletion criteria A7 and/or guidelines on web sites. Please provide more information on why the web site is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Icestorm815 • Talk 03:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Michael "WippaWipfli
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
67 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
54 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
52 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
125 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
56 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
163 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
15 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
110 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
905 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
330 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
I-805 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
133 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
241 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
261 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
259 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
78 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
86S Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
75 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
138 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
204 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
217 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
178 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
135 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
154 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. Neologisms are not considered notable unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong sourcing. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
US 101 Express Lanes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Otay Mesa Road
This request for creation has been accepted. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
With possibilities: This is a redirect from a title that potentially could be expanded into a new article or other type of associated page such as a new template. The topic described by this title may be more detailed than is currently provided on the target page or in a section of that page.
When the target page becomes too large, or for any reason a new page would be an improvement, this redirect may be replaced with an article, template or other project page that is carved out of the target page. See also {{R to section}} and use together with this rcat when appropriate.
If the topic of the redirect is not susceptible to expansion, then use other rcats such as {{R to section}} or {{R to list entry}}when appropriate.
Since a new page may be created, links to this redirect should not be replaced with a direct link to the target page. To make redirects to this page, use {{R avoided double redirect}}.
{{R printworthy}} should be used together with this template when applied to a redirect in mainspace.
Redirect created. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
document production (legal procedure)
In civil procedure, during the discovery phase of litigation, a party to a lawsuit may request that another party provide any documents that it has that pertain to the subject matter of the lawsuit. For example, a party in a court case may obtain copies of e-mail messages sent by employees of the opposing party. The other party is then required to furnish copies of any documents that are responsive to the request, except for those that are legally privileged. The rules governing requests for the production of documents vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction; in the U.S. Federal court system, such requests are governed by Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Sources
"Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes". Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
In U.S. legal procedure, each party to a lawsuit has the duty to disclose certain information, such as the names and addresses of witnesses, and copies of any documents that it intends to use as evidence, to the opposing party. This duty is subject to certain exceptions, as outlined in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; furthermore, the rules applicable in state courts vary from state to state.
Sources
"Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery". Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
Despite its relative obscurity, the Maroonbook has been praised by federal judge Richard Posner as a substitute for the Bluebook, pillorying the latter for displaying "an excessive, an unhealthy--one is almost tempted to say, since this is still the land of freedom, an un-American--obsession with uniformity. By teaching that uniformity is one of the most important things in law, the Bluebook encourages the tendency of young lawyers, many of whom in their larval stage are law review editors and in their chrysalis stage the ghostwriters of judges and senior partners (the butterflies), to cultivate a most dismal sameness of style, a lowest-common-denominator style. The Bluebook creates an atmosphere of formality and redundancy in which the drab, Latinate, plethoric, euphemistic style of law reviews and judicial opinions flourishes."[1] The Maroonbook, according to Posner, "corrects most of the Bluebook's faults...and introduces no new ones. It vastly simplifies citation form without depriving the reader of any valuable information...It leaves much to the discretion of the author and editor yet without imposing on them a difficult burden of thought and decision..."[2] In response, the Harvard Law Review responded with an unflattering and anonymous review, suggesting that the reforms made in the Maroonbook are too indeterminate, unnecessary, or derivative of the Bluebook.[3]
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Two Million Minutes
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Two Million Minutes is a documentary film by executive producer Bob Compton that compares the high school student's experience of studying in America, China and India. Specifically top performing students in Indiana, Shanghai and Bangalore share their experiences. In the United States as in India and China the equivalent K-12 education program takes roughly two million minutes of a students life.
This documentary is about how different those education minutes are used and experienced within these cultures. It also exposes the deeper and radically different cultural values that affect students' performance. How the culture determines what these students choose to focus on during those years. Consequently, the focus narrows on how and what in students' experience is celebrated and held up for recognition by each culture as a whole.
Declined. We cannot accept unsourced suggestions or sources that are not reliable per the verifiability policy. Please provide reputable, third-party sources with your suggestions. Third party sources are needed both to establish the verifiability of the submission as well as its notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
sheldon M
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Jason Franci
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Jason Franci
has coached at Montgomery High School for 37 years, including the past 28 as head coach. He also played 10 games in the NFL with the Denver Broncos in 1966 and two years in the CFL. He was inshrined into the Sports Hall of Fame at the Santa Rosa Junior College in 1997. He has compiled a 207-97-8 record in his tenure at Montgomery. He has led Montgomery to three NCS Championships in the last eleven seasons. Since the year 2000 he has led Montgomery to 5 championship games in 8 years. His win total is second to Ed Lloyd who has 219. Sources say he wants to get 220 victories or more then retire from football. He resides in Windsor and is retired from teaching. He shows up in the afternoon to supervise his players while they are in the weight room and football field. He lives with his girlfriend Michelle.
Montgomery/Newman Rivalry
Montgomery and Cardinal Newman have been going at it since 1975, with Cardinal Newman having compiled a 21-10-1 record vs Montgomery. The games have been known for a large crowd, Big Hits and a great game. The games in recent years have determined who would win the North Bay Leaguge Crown. One of the most exciting games in this great rivalry took place on November 13th, 2004. Cardinal Newman was serving the final year of there probation and looking to finish the year with a win and a NBL Title. The Vikings came into the game as the #2 ranked team in Northern California behind High School football juggernott De La Salle. The Vikings struggled for most of the game. But they were able to score 13 unanswered points including a 51 yard touchdown pass to one of the schools most finest athletes Marcus Ezeff. The victory gave Montgomery the NBL crown and prepeled them to a 13-0 season and a NCS Championship.
The next meeting between the two teams took place in the 2006-2007 season. On October 7th, 2006. Cardinal Newman was undefeated and heavy favorites to go to state. Montgomery were huge underdoggs and had no marquee names. The Cardinals jumped to a 24-7 lead in the early stages of the 3rd quarter. But the Vikings roared back to score 20 points in a span of 5:00 minutes. The Vikings won it on a missed field goal as time expired and Montgomery pulled of the biggest upset in Northern California. The win lead to an NBL title for the Vikings. These two teams met later in the season for the NCS Redwood Empire Championship. Cardinal Newman won by a score of 39-0. In the last seven meetings the team that is on the road has won the game.
This is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.
Dr. Chukka Ramaiah
This request for creation has been declined. Please do not modify it.
This request for creation has been reviewed. The reviewer comments appear below the article text.
If you want to make changes and try again, copy and paste your article into a new submission and make your changes there.
Dr. Chukka Ramaiah, a mathematician, freedom fighter, erudite, graduates MLC and in a word a paragon of virtues from Andhra Pradesh, India. He is also fondly known as IIT Ramaiah, given that many of his students are now in various IIT's across the country.
Anantha Ramaiah was born in 1928 in Gudur village in Warangal district in Andhra Pradesh. He finished his M Sc (Maths) and his bachelors in education from Osmania University, Hyderabad. Dr. Ramaiah, after his retirement as principal of AP Residential Degree College in Nagarjuna Sagar (ANDHRA PRADESH) in 1983 he moved to Hyderabad and started his IIT coaching center in a modest way from his residence in Vidya Nagar Hyderabad.
Then, a half-a-dozen students preparing for the IIT entrance test approached him to teach mathematics. But, none of them was qualified in the test.
In 1984 ten persons received coaching and 6 were qualified. Later, the number of students approaching for coaching and their success rate has slowly gone up.
Ramaiah's coaching center is a bit choosy when it comes to taking in students. He restricts the number of students he coaches to 125.
Thus the Ramaiah Institute has become a synonymous with the IIT coaching. Every year hundreds of students started approaching to get the seats. But, only a few of them would be fortunate ones. Explaining how the students were taken in to the institution, Ramaiah said that an entrance test was conducted every year to take only 120 students.
The test was "Sarcastically" called "Entrance Test for Entrance Test".
Now, Ramaiah is a well known name in IIT coaching and more than 2000 students tutored by Ramaiah are studying in various IIT's across the country.
Mr. Ramaiah, in 2006, contested for the Teachers' MLC for Nalgonda-Khammam-Warangal teachers' constituency and won with great majaority.
Kappa Omega Mu Fraternity
The Kappa Omega Mu Fraternity is an established local fraternity at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, WA. They promote service, community, and leadership. Their motto is love, peace, and prosperity.