Rolf Steininger

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rolf Steininger (born August 2, 1942 in Plettenberg ) is a German - Austrian historian and emeritus professor for contemporary history at the University of Innsbruck .

Life

Steininger was born in Plettenberg, Westphalia, and graduated from the Jung-Stilling-Gymnasium in Hilchenbach in 1962 . He then studied English and history in Marburg , Göttingen , Munich , Lancaster and Cardiff . He received his doctorate in 1971 under Wilhelm Treue at the Technical University of Hanover with a thesis on the history of the shortwave service of the public broadcasters in the Federal Republic of Germany. phil., in 1976 the habilitation for modern and recent history including Anglo-American history followed at the University of Hanover . From 1980 he taught as a professor at the University of Hanover, in 1983 he was appointed to the University of Innsbruck .

Steininger has been a Jean Monnet Professor since 1995 . He is a Senior Fellow of the Eisenhower Center for American Studies at the University of New Orleans and serves on the board of the European Community Studies Association . He taught as a visiting professor at the Universities of Tel Aviv , Queensland , New Orleans and Bolzano , and was also a visiting scholar in Saigon, Hanoi and Cape Town. He is also an Advisory Board Member for H-German .

From 1984 to 2010 he headed the Institute for Contemporary History at the Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck . Steininger mainly deals with German post-war history as well as the history of South Tyrol and Austria . Rolf Steininger has produced numerous documentaries, some of which have been awarded prizes.

Positions

In a post published in 1985, Steininger criticized A Chance for Reunification? the politics of Konrad Adenauer . He took the view that Germany should not have been divided and answered the question in the negative as to whether Adenauer's political course was the right one. In his opinion, the rejection of the Stalin note in 1952 was a mistake, as he assumed that Stalin's offer was meant seriously and that the offer should have been explored. Other historians, including Gerhard Wettig and Peter Ruggenthaler, disagreed with these theses because they viewed Stalin's offer as a foreign policy bluff .

Fonts

as editor

Awards

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. ^ Gerhard Wettig: Review of Peter Ruggenthaler: Stalin's great bluff. The history of the Stalin Note in documents of the Soviet leadership. Munich 2007. In: H-Soz-u-Kult, January 7th, 2008. Peter Ruggenthaler (Ed.): Stalin's great bluff. The history of the Stalin Note in documents of the Soviet leadership (= series of the quarterly books for contemporary history; Volume 95). Oldenbourg, Munich, 2007, ISBN 978-3-486-58398-4 .
  2. "The central chapters of the book prepare [...] only those interested parties who are not disturbed by the fact that the author's text mainly consists of direct quotations and paraphrases of the file content in indirect speech. The files are anything but boring texts, but the author lacks independent conceptual power. An overall interpretation supported by leitmotifs that goes beyond the analysis of the respective decision-making situations is not recognizable. "
  3. Bureaucratic monster piece. In: FAZ . July 22, 2013, p. 8.
  4. ^ Tyrolean State Prize for Science - Prize Winners 1984 to 2014 ( Memento from October 13, 2015 in the Internet Archive ). Retrieved October 14, 2015.