Flaming Creatures: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add Österreichisches Filmmuseum
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1963 American experimental film directed by Jack Smith}}
{{Short description|1963 experimental film by Jack Smith}}
{{Infobox film
{{Infobox film
| name = Flaming Creatures
| name = Flaming Creatures
Line 20: Line 20:
| budget = $300
| budget = $300
}}
}}
'''''Flaming Creatures''''' is a 1963 [[American films|American]] [[experimental film]] directed by [[Jack Smith (film director)|Jack Smith]]. The film shows performers dressed in elaborate [[drag (clothing)|drag]] for several disconnected scenes, including a [[lipstick]] commercial, an orgy, and an earthquake. It premiered April 29, 1963 at the [[Bleecker Street Cinema]] in [[New York City]].
'''''Flaming Creatures''''' is a 1963 American [[experimental film]] directed by [[Jack Smith (film director)|Jack Smith]]. The film follows an ensemble of [[drag performer]]s through several disconnected vignettes, including a lipstick commercial, an orgy, and an earthquake. It was shot on a rooftop on the [[Lower East Side]] on a [[no-budget film|very low budget]] of only $300, with a soundtrack from Smith's roommate [[Tony Conrad]]. It premiered April 29, 1963 at the [[Bleecker Street Cinema]] in [[Greenwich Village]].


Because of its graphic depiction of sexuality, some venues refused to show ''Flaming Creatures'', and in March 1964, police interrupted a screening and seized a print of the film. [[Jonas Mekas]], [[Ken Jacobs]], and Florence Karpf were charged, and the film was ruled to be in violation of New York's [[obscenity]] laws. Mekas and [[Susan Sontag]] mounted a critical defense of ''Flaming Creatures'', and it became a ''[[cause célèbre]]'' for the [[underground film]] movement.
Because of the film's sexual content, some venues refused to show ''Flaming Creatures'', and in March 1964, police interrupted a screening and seized a print of the film. [[Jonas Mekas]], [[Ken Jacobs]], and Florence Karpf were prosecuted, and the film was ruled to be in violation of New York's [[obscenity]] laws. Mekas and critic [[Susan Sontag]] mounted a critical defense of ''Flaming Creatures'', and it became a ''[[cause célèbre]]'' for the [[New American Cinema]] movement. Judge [[Abe Fortas]], who had spoken in favor of reversing the convictions, faced scrutiny for his position years later when he was nominated to become [[Chief Justice of the United States]]. ''Flaming Creatures'' eventually fell out of circulation, and after Smith's death, a restoration was undertaken to preserve the film.


==Plot==
==Plot==
Most of the film's characters are sexually ambiguous, including [[transvestite]]s, [[intersex]], and drag performers. ''Flaming Creatures'' is largely non-narrative, and its action is often interrupted by cutaways to close-ups of body parts.<ref name="Siegel 1997, p. 95">Siegel 1997, p. 95.</ref>
Most of the film's characters are sexually ambiguous, including [[transvestite]], [[intersex]], and drag performers. ''Flaming Creatures'' is largely non-narrative, and its action is often interrupted by cutaways to close-ups of body parts.<ref name="Siegel 1997, p. 95">Siegel 1997, p. 95.</ref>


The film opens with a credits sequence set to the soundtrack of ''[[Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves (1944 film)|Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves]]'' and the announcement that "Ali Baba comes today!". Two creatures laze in a garden and dance. In what Smith called the "smirching sequence", characters apply lipstick while a mock advertisement poses the question, "Is there lipstick that doesn't come off when you suck cocks?" Two creatures chase each other, and one throws the other to the ground.<ref>Hoberman 2008, pp. 11–7.</ref> Several creatures gather around her in a rape scene, which grows into a large orgy. The earth begins to quake, and the creatures collapse.<ref>Sitney 2002, pp. 335–6.</ref>
The film opens with a credits sequence set to the soundtrack of ''[[Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves (1944 film)|Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves]]'' and the announcement that "Ali Baba comes today!". Two creatures laze in a garden and dance. In what Smith called the "smirching sequence", characters apply lipstick while a mock advertisement poses the question, "Is there lipstick that doesn't come off when you suck cocks?" Two creatures chase each other, and one throws the other to the ground.<ref>Hoberman 2008, pp. 11–7.</ref> Several creatures gather around her in a rape scene, which grows into a large orgy. The earth begins to quake, and the creatures collapse.<ref>Sitney 2002, pp. 335–6.</ref>


A [[vampire]] resembling [[Marilyn Monroe]] climbs out of a coffin and drains some of the lifeless creatures. This reignites the action, and the creatures rise again to dance with one another.<ref name="Siegel 1997, p. 95"/>
A [[vampire]] resembling [[Marilyn Monroe]] climbs out of a coffin and drains some of the lifeless creatures. This reignites the action, and the creatures rise again to dance with one another.<ref name="Siegel 1997, p. 95"/>
Line 42: Line 42:


==Production==
==Production==
Smith shared an apartment with artist [[Marian Zazeela]] for a period in the early 1960s.<ref name="Joseph 2008, p. 231">Joseph 2008, p. 231.</ref> He published ''The Beautiful Book'', a series of photographs with Zazeela that began to develop the aesthetic of ''Flaming Creatures''. Smith conceived the film as a vehicle for Zazeela. However, she began working with composer [[La Monte Young]] and was unable to participate in Smith's project.<ref name="Joseph 2008, p. 231"/><ref>Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 159.</ref> After she moved out, he became roommates with [[Tony Conrad]] and replaced Zazeela with Sheila Bick.<ref>Hoberman 2008, p. 24.</ref> He filmed ''Flaming Creatures'' in mid to late 1962. He held shoots during weekends on the roof of the Windsor Theatre, at 412 Grand Street in the Bronx.<ref name="siegel-criticism">{{cite journal |last=Siegel |first=Marc |year=2014 |title=...For MM |journal=Criticism |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=361–74|doi=10.13110/criticism.56.2.0361 |s2cid=258057358 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.movingimagesource.us/articles/up-on-the-roof-20120105|title=Up on the Roof by J. Hoberman - Moving Image Source|website=www.movingimagesource.us|access-date=2018-12-11}}</ref> Dick Preston offered his loft above the theatre for use as a prop department and dressing room.<ref>Hoberman 2008, pp. 25–6.</ref> Smith had observed the effects of using out-of-date film working on Ken Jacobs' ''[[Star Spangled to Death]]'' and decided to use the technique after seeing [[Ron Rice]]'s ''[[The Flower Thief]]''.<ref>Sitney 2002, p. 335.</ref> He used stolen Army surplus [[Kodak]] Plus-X reversal film.<ref name="all-things-considered">{{cite AV media |people= |date=February 20, 2004 |title=[[All Things Considered]] |medium=Radio broadcast |publisher=[[NPR]] }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Dixon |first=Wheeler |date=1986 |title=Financing for the Independent Filmmaker: Sources and Strategies |journal=[[Journal of Film and Video]] |publisher=[[University of Illinois Press]] |volume=38 |issue=1 |page=31}}</ref> The reels were out-of-date, giving parts of the film a foggy or high-contrast texture.<ref>Joseph 2008, p. 229.</ref>
Smith shared an apartment with artist [[Marian Zazeela]] for a period during the early 1960s.<ref name="Joseph 2008, p. 231">Joseph 2008, p. 231.</ref> He began taking seminude black-and-white photographs with her as a model, along with Francis Francine, Joel Markman, [[Mario Montez]], Arnold Rockwood, and Irving Rosenthal. This grew into ''The Beautiful Book'', a small volume of photographs published with the help of [[Piero Heliczer]]. The book began to develop the aesthetic of ''Flaming Creatures''.<ref>Verevis 2020, pp. 17–19.</ref> Smith conceived the idea of making a film to serve as a vehicle for Zazeela. However, she began working with composer [[La Monte Young]] and was unable to participate in Smith's project.<ref name="Joseph 2008, p. 231"/><ref>Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 159.</ref> After she moved out, he became roommates with Tony Conrad and replaced Zazeela with Sheila Bick.<ref>Hoberman 2008, p. 24.</ref>


Filming of ''Flaming Creatures'' took place over eight weekend afternoons in mid to late 1962.<ref>Verevis 2020, pp. 20.</ref> Smith held shoots on the roof of the Windsor Theatre, at 412 Grand Street on the [[Lower East Side]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.movingimagesource.us/articles/up-on-the-roof-20120105 |title=Up on the Roof |last=Hoberman |first=J. |author-link=J. Hoberman |date=January 5, 2012 |publisher=[[Museum of the Moving Image]] |access-date=December 11, 2018}}</ref> Dick Preston offered his loft above the theatre for use as a prop department and dressing room.<ref>Hoberman 2008, pp. 25–6.</ref> Many of the models from ''The Beautiful Book'' made appearances in the film. Smith had observed the effects of using out-of-date film working on Ken Jacobs' ''[[Star Spangled to Death]]'' and decided to use the technique after seeing [[Ron Rice]]'s ''[[The Flower Thief]]''.<ref>Sitney 2002, p. 335.</ref> He used stolen Army surplus [[Kodak]] Plus-X reversal film.<ref name="all-things-considered">{{cite AV media |people= |date=February 20, 2004 |title=[[All Things Considered]] |medium=Radio broadcast |publisher=[[NPR]] }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Dixon |first=Wheeler Winston |author-link=Wheeler Winston Dixon |date=1986 |title=Financing for the Independent Filmmaker: Sources and Strategies |journal=[[Journal of Film and Video]] |publisher=[[University of Illinois Press]] |volume=38 |issue=1 |page=31}}</ref> The reels were out-of-date, giving parts of the film a foggy or high-contrast texture.<ref>Joseph 2008, p. 229.</ref>
The film's working title was ''Pasty Thighs and Moldy Midriffs''; Smith also considered using ''Flaking Moldy Almond Petals'', ''Moldy Rapture'', or ''Horora Femina''.<ref>Hoberman 2008, p. 29.</ref> Smith made ''Flaming Creatures'' as a way to film "all the funniest stuff he could think of" and depict "different ideas of glamour."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Siegel |first=Marc |year=2014 |title=Beyond the Rented World: An Introduction |journal=Criticism |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=153–7|doi=10.13110/criticism.56.2.0153 |s2cid=150673335 }}</ref> He produced the film on a [[no budget film|very low budget]] of $300.<ref name="johnson-criticism">{{cite journal |last=Johnson |first=Dominic |year=2014 |title=Modern Death: Jack Smith, Fred Herko, and Paul Thek |journal=Criticism |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=211–34|doi=10.13110/criticism.56.2.0211 |s2cid=190819537 }}</ref>


The film's working title was ''Pasty Thighs and Moldy Midriffs''; Smith also considered using ''Flaking Moldy Almond Petals'', ''Moldy Rapture'', or ''Horora Femina''.<ref>Hoberman 2008, p. 29.</ref> He made ''Flaming Creatures'' as a way to film "all the funniest stuff he could think of" and depict "different ideas of glamour."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Siegel |first=Marc |year=2014 |title=Beyond the Rented World: An Introduction |journal=Criticism |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=153–7|doi=10.13110/criticism.56.2.0153 |s2cid=150673335 }}</ref> He produced the film on a [[no budget film|very low budget]] of $300.<ref name="johnson-criticism">{{cite journal |last=Johnson |first=Dominic |year=2014 |title=Modern Death: Jack Smith, Fred Herko, and Paul Thek |journal=Criticism |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=211–34|doi=10.13110/criticism.56.2.0211 |s2cid=190819537 }}</ref>
Smith shared an apartment with [[Tony Conrad]], who produced the film's soundtrack. The two lived in a building on the [[Lower East Side]], where [[Angus MacLise]] lived and René Rivera (later known as [[Mario Montez]]) moved. They held informal group sessions during the evening which Conrad recorded.<ref name="siegel-criticism"/> A [[sound collage|tape collage]],<ref>{{cite web |last1=Needs |first1=Kris |title=Wasn't Born to Follow |url=https://recordcollectormag.com/articles/wasnt-born-follow |website=Record Collector |access-date=May 11, 2023 |date=August 10, 2016}}</ref> the soundtrack incorporates "Siboney" by [[Ernesto Lecuona]], "Amapola" by [[Joseph Lacalle]], and various [[pasodoble]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Suárez |first=Juan A. |year=2014 |title=Jack Smith, Hélio Oiticica, Tropicalism |journal=Criticism |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=295–328|doi=10.13110/criticism.56.2.0295 |s2cid=190430340 }}</ref> Smith began screening unfinished versions of ''Flaming Creatures'' to friends. [[Piero Heliczer]] held a benefit for the film at painter [[Jerry Joffen]]'s loft. Mekas discussed a private screening of the film through his column in ''[[The Village Voice]]'', and Conrad produced a second version of the soundtrack for the film's theatrical premiere.<ref name="Leffingwell, Kismaric 1997, p. 161">Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 161.</ref>

Tony Conrad, with whom Smith shared an apartment, produced the film's soundtrack. The two lived in a building on the [[Lower East Side]], where [[Angus MacLise]] lived and into which Montez ended up moving. They held informal group sessions during the evening, which Conrad recorded.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Siegel |first=Marc |year=2014 |title=...For MM |journal=Criticism |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=361–74|doi=10.13110/criticism.56.2.0361 |s2cid=258057358 }}</ref> The soundtrack, a [[sound collage|tape collage]],<ref>{{cite web |last1=Needs |first1=Kris |title=Wasn't Born to Follow |url=https://recordcollectormag.com/articles/wasnt-born-follow |website=Record Collector |access-date=May 11, 2023 |date=August 10, 2016}}</ref> incorporates "[[Siboney (song)|Siboney]]" by [[Ernesto Lecuona]], "Amapola" by [[Joseph Lacalle]], and various [[pasodoble]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Suárez |first=Juan A. |year=2014 |title=Jack Smith, Hélio Oiticica, Tropicalism |journal=Criticism |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |volume=56 |issue=2 |pages=295–328|doi=10.13110/criticism.56.2.0295 |s2cid=190430340 }}</ref> Smith began screening unfinished versions of ''Flaming Creatures'' to friends. Heliczer held a benefit for the film at painter [[Jerry Joffen]]'s loft. Mekas discussed a private screening of the film through his column in ''[[The Village Voice]]'', and Conrad produced a second version of the soundtrack for the film's theatrical premiere.<ref name="Leffingwell, Kismaric 1997, p. 161">Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 161.</ref>


==Release==
==Release==
Line 56: Line 58:
===Obscenity trial and censorship===
===Obscenity trial and censorship===
[[File:Jonas Mekas in Biržai, Lithuania, 1971.jpg|thumb|right|upright|[[Jonas Mekas]] ''(pictured in 1971)'' was among those arrested and prosecuted for screening the film.]]
[[File:Jonas Mekas in Biržai, Lithuania, 1971.jpg|thumb|right|upright|[[Jonas Mekas]] ''(pictured in 1971)'' was among those arrested and prosecuted for screening the film.]]
In February 1964, the Film-Makers' Cinematheque successfully showed the films from the Tivoli program at the New Bowery Theater, as a program titled "Our Infamous Surprise Program". During the program's third showing on March 3, police stopped the event while ''Flaming Creatures'' was being screened.<ref name="angell-criticism"/> They arrested Mekas, Ken Jacobs, Florence Karpf, and Jerry Sims and seized the film reels and projection equipment.<ref name="angell-criticism"/><ref>{{cite news |date=March 4, 1964 |title=Avant-Garde Movie Seized as Obscene |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |page=33 }}</ref> The police department did not return the only print of Warhol's film, about the making of ''Normal Love'', and it is now considered lost.<ref name="angell-criticism"/> Mekas held a benefit screening of ''[[Un chant d'amour]]'' to raise money for a legal defense fund but was arrested again.<ref>Hoberman and Rosenbaum 1983, p. 60.</ref>
In February 1964, the Film-Makers' Cinematheque successfully showed the films from the Tivoli program at the New Bowery Theater, as a program titled "Our Infamous Surprise Program". During the program's third showing on March 3, police stopped the event while ''Flaming Creatures'' was being screened.<ref name="angell-criticism"/> They arrested Mekas, Jacobs, Florence Karpf, and Jerry Sims and seized the film reels and projection equipment.<ref name="angell-criticism"/><ref>{{cite news |date=March 4, 1964 |title=Avant-Garde Movie Seized as Obscene |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |page=33 }}</ref> The police department did not return the only print of Warhol's film, about the making of ''Normal Love'', and it is now considered lost.<ref name="angell-criticism"/> Mekas held a benefit screening of ''[[Un chant d'amour]]'' to raise money for a legal defense fund but was arrested again.<ref>Hoberman and Rosenbaum 1983, p. 60.</ref>


Civil rights lawyer [[Emile Zola Berman]] accepted the case, believing it would potentially reach the [[U.S. Supreme Court]].<ref>Hoberman 2008, p. 44.</ref> Sims, who had been taking tickets, managed to avoid prosecution by claiming he had not seen what was on the screen.<ref>MacDonald 1998, p. 375.</ref> ''People of the State of New York v. Kenneth Jacobs, Florence Karpf and Jonas Mekas'' was heard on June 12, 1964.<ref name="Hoberman 2008, pp. 44–6">Hoberman 2008, pp. 44–6.</ref> As part of the defense, expert testimony came from filmmaker [[Shirley Clarke]], poet [[Allen Ginsberg]], writer [[Susan Sontag]], filmmaker [[Willard Van Dyke]] and film historian Herman G. Weinberger.<ref>Pierson 2011, p. 8.</ref><ref name="leland-nyt">{{cite news |last=Leland |first=John |date=October 31, 2015 |title=The Prosecution Rests in a 1964 Obscenity Case |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/01/nyregion/the-prosecution-resets-in-a-1964-obscenity-case.html |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=July 4, 2016 }}</ref> The defendants were convicted but given suspended sentences.<ref name="Hoberman 2008, pp. 44–6"/> They appealed on the grounds that the trial had excluded the expert testimony provided. The [[New York Supreme Court]] heard the appeal and reversed the convictions. It stated in its opinion that "whatever view this Court might hold as to the obscenity of 'Flaming Creatures,' it is manifest that the appellants herein believe in good faith that the film is not obscene."<ref>Pierson 2011, p. 20.</ref> Fifty years later, the prosecutor for the case issued an apology to Mekas, writing, "Although my appreciation of free expression and aversion to censorship developed more fully as I matured, I should have sooner acted more courageously."<ref name="leland-nyt"/>
Civil rights lawyer [[Emile Zola Berman]] accepted the case, believing it would potentially reach the [[U.S. Supreme Court]].<ref>Hoberman 2008, p. 44.</ref> Sims, who had been taking tickets, managed to avoid prosecution by claiming he had not seen what was on the screen.<ref>MacDonald 1998, p. 375.</ref> ''People of the State of New York v. Kenneth Jacobs, Florence Karpf and Jonas Mekas'' was heard on June 12, 1964.<ref name="Hoberman 2008, pp. 44–6">Hoberman 2008, pp. 44–6.</ref> As part of the defense, expert testimony came from filmmaker [[Shirley Clarke]], poet [[Allen Ginsberg]], writer Susan Sontag, filmmaker [[Willard Van Dyke]] and film historian Herman G. Weinberger.<ref>Pierson 2011, p. 8.</ref><ref name="leland-nyt">{{cite news |last=Leland |first=John |date=October 31, 2015 |title=The Prosecution Rests in a 1964 Obscenity Case |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/01/nyregion/the-prosecution-resets-in-a-1964-obscenity-case.html |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=July 4, 2016 }}</ref> The defendants were convicted but given suspended sentences.<ref name="Hoberman 2008, pp. 44–6"/> They appealed on the grounds that the trial had excluded the expert testimony provided. The [[New York Supreme Court]] heard the appeal and reversed the convictions. It stated in its opinion that "whatever view this Court might hold as to the obscenity of 'Flaming Creatures,' it is manifest that the appellants herein believe in good faith that the film is not obscene."<ref>Pierson 2011, p. 20.</ref> Fifty years later, the prosecutor for the case issued an apology to Mekas, writing, "Although my appreciation of free expression and aversion to censorship developed more fully as I matured, I should have sooner acted more courageously."<ref name="leland-nyt"/>


In April 1965, an off-campus screening by students of the [[University of New Mexico]] was raided by police, who seized the print. In November 1966, a screening by the [[UT Austin]] chapter of [[Students for a Democratic Society]] was broken up.<ref>Hoberman 2008, p. 46.</ref> A January 1967 screening at the [[University of Michigan]] resulted in the confiscation of the film and the arrest of four students, triggering protests and a sit-in by students.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://michigantoday.umich.edu/a7699/ |title=The flap over 'Flaming Creatures' |last=Glenn |first=Alan |date=April 14, 2010 |website=[[Michigan Today]] |access-date=July 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, pp. 162–3.</ref> A screening at the [[University of Notre Dame]] at its Pornography and Censorship Conference in 1969 was canceled. When students attempted to screen prohibited films, police interrupted the event, leading to the school's first known violent conflict between police and students.<ref>Suárez 1996, p. 183.</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://magazine.nd.edu/news/56876-echoes-the-damnedest-experience-we-ever-had/ |title=Echoes: The damnedest experience we ever had |last=Hunt |first=Tara |year=2015 |website=[[Notre Dame Magazine]] |access-date=July 4, 2016}}</ref>
In April 1965, an off-campus screening by students of the [[University of New Mexico]] was raided by police, who seized the print. In November 1966, a screening by the [[UT Austin]] chapter of [[Students for a Democratic Society]] was broken up.<ref>Hoberman 2008, p. 46.</ref> A January 1967 screening at the [[University of Michigan]] resulted in the confiscation of the film and the arrest of four students, triggering protests and a sit-in by students.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://michigantoday.umich.edu/a7699/ |title=The flap over 'Flaming Creatures' |last=Glenn |first=Alan |date=April 14, 2010 |website=[[Michigan Today]] |access-date=July 4, 2016}}</ref><ref>Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, pp. 162–3.</ref> A screening at the [[University of Notre Dame]] at its Pornography and Censorship Conference in 1969 was canceled. When students attempted to screen prohibited films, police interrupted the event, leading to the school's first known violent conflict between police and students.<ref>Suárez 1996, p. 183.</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://magazine.nd.edu/news/56876-echoes-the-damnedest-experience-we-ever-had/ |title=Echoes: The damnedest experience we ever had |last=Hunt |first=Tara |year=2015 |website=[[Notre Dame Magazine]] |access-date=July 4, 2016}}</ref>
Line 68: Line 70:


==Critical reception==
==Critical reception==
When ''Flaming Creatures'' was released in 1963, ''[[Film Culture]]'' reviewer Ken Kelman described it as a [[John Milton|Miltonian]] "ancient ritual chant…not for the Paradise Lost, but for the Hell Satan gained."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Kelman |first=Ken |year=1963 |title=Smith Myth |journal=[[Film Culture]] |issue=29 |page=5}}</ref> [[Arthur Knight (film critic)|Arthur Knight]] called the film a "faggoty stag-reel ... defiling at once both sex and cinema."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Knight |first=Arthur |authorlink=Arthur Knight (film critic) |year=1963 |title=New American Cinema? |journal=[[Saturday Review (U.S. magazine)|Saturday Review]] |page=41}}</ref> [[Pete Hamill]] described it as "a sophomoric exercise in the kind of sex that [[Henry Miller]] dealt with 30 years ago."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Hamill |first=Pete |authorlink=Pete Hamill |date=September 28, 1963 |title=Explosion in the Movie Underground |journal=[[The Saturday Evening Post]] |page=83}}</ref>
When ''Flaming Creatures'' was released in 1963, ''[[Film Culture]]'' reviewer Ken Kelman described it as a [[John Milton|Miltonian]] "ancient ritual chant…not for the Paradise Lost, but for the Hell Satan gained."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Kelman |first=Ken |year=1963 |title=Smith Myth |journal=[[Film Culture]] |issue=29 |page=5}}</ref> In the ''[[Saturday Review (U.S. magazine)|Saturday Review]]'', [[Arthur Knight (film critic)|Arthur Knight]] called the film a "faggoty stag-reel ... defiling at once both sex and cinema."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Knight |first=Arthur |authorlink=Arthur Knight (film critic) |year=1963 |title=New American Cinema? |journal=[[Saturday Review (U.S. magazine)|Saturday Review]] |page=41}}</ref> [[Pete Hamill]], writing for ''[[The Saturday Evening Post]]'', described it as "a sophomoric exercise in the kind of sex that [[Henry Miller]] dealt with 30 years ago."<ref>{{cite journal |last=Hamill |first=Pete |authorlink=Pete Hamill |date=September 28, 1963 |title=Explosion in the Movie Underground |journal=[[The Saturday Evening Post]] |page=83}}</ref>


Following the seizure of the film, the director of the [[Homosexual League of New York]] called ''Flaming Creatures'' "long, disturbing and psychologically unpleasant".<ref>Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 74.</ref> [[Amos Vogel]] likened it to a [[film noir]] that "despite flashes of brilliance and moments of perverse, tortured beauty" was full of "limp genitalia and limp art."<ref>{{cite news |last=Vogel |first=Amos |authorlink=Amos Vogel |date=May 7, 1964 |title=Flaming Creatures Cannot Carry Freedom's Torch |newspaper=[[The Village Voice]] |pages=9–18 }}</ref> [[Susan Sontag]] praised the film in a 1966 essay as a "rare modern work of art: it is about joy and innocence."<ref>Sontag 2001, p. 229.</ref> P. Adams Sitney described ''Flaming Creatures'' as "a myth of recovered innocence" in which Smith "utterly transforms his sources and uncovers a mythic center from which they had been closed off."<ref>Sitney 2002, pp. 335–7.</ref> [[Jonathan Rosenbaum]] called the film "one of the greatest and most pleasurable avant-garde movies ever made".<ref>{{cite news |last=Rosenbaum |first=Jonathan |authorlink=Jonathan Rosenbaum |date=February 19, 1998 |title=Sweet Outrage |url=http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/sweet-outrage/Content?oid=895615 |newspaper=[[Chicago Reader]] |volume=27 |issue=20 |access-date=July 4, 2016 }}</ref> According to ''The Village Voice Film Guide'', [[Gregory Markopoulos]] "was only slightly exaggerating when he commented that ... early audiences were astounded when their secret Hollywood fantasies burst upon the screen".<ref>Hoberman 2010, p. 115.</ref>
Following the seizure of the film, the director of the [[Homosexual League of New York]] called ''Flaming Creatures'' "long, disturbing and psychologically unpleasant".<ref>Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 74.</ref> Curator [[Amos Vogel]] likened it to a [[film noir]] that "despite flashes of brilliance and moments of perverse, tortured beauty" was full of "limp genitalia and limp art."<ref>{{cite news |last=Vogel |first=Amos |authorlink=Amos Vogel |date=May 7, 1964 |title=Flaming Creatures Cannot Carry Freedom's Torch |newspaper=[[The Village Voice]] |pages=9–18 }}</ref> Sontag praised the film in a 1966 essay as a "rare modern work of art: it is about joy and innocence."<ref>Sontag 2001, p. 229.</ref> P. Adams Sitney described ''Flaming Creatures'' as "a myth of recovered innocence" in which Smith "utterly transforms his sources and uncovers a mythic center from which they had been closed off."<ref>Sitney 2002, pp. 335–7.</ref> [[Jonathan Rosenbaum]] called the film "one of the greatest and most pleasurable avant-garde movies ever made".<ref>{{cite news |last=Rosenbaum |first=Jonathan |authorlink=Jonathan Rosenbaum |date=February 19, 1998 |title=Sweet Outrage |url=http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/sweet-outrage/Content?oid=895615 |newspaper=[[Chicago Reader]] |volume=27 |issue=20 |access-date=July 4, 2016 }}</ref> According to ''The Village Voice Film Guide'', [[Gregory Markopoulos]] "was only slightly exaggerating when he commented that ... early audiences were astounded when their secret Hollywood fantasies burst upon the screen".<ref>Hoberman 2010, p. 115.</ref>


==Legacy==
==Legacy==
Anthology Film Archives included ''Flaming Creatures'' in its Essential Cinema Repertory collection.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://anthologyfilmarchives.org/about/essential-cinema |title=Essential Cinema |publisher=[[Anthology Film Archives]] |access-date=June 1, 2022}}</ref> The film is listed in the reference book ''[[1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die]]'', which says "The film's distinctive beauty is due largely to Smith's nimble use of the handheld camera. His unexpected framings yield dense images of fabrics, body parts, and heavily made-up faces."{{sfn|Schneider|2013}}
Anthology Film Archives placed ''Flaming Creatures'' in its Essential Cinema Repertory collection.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://anthologyfilmarchives.org/about/essential-cinema |title=Essential Cinema |publisher=[[Anthology Film Archives]] |access-date=June 1, 2022}}</ref> The [[Austrian Film Museum]] included the film in its cyclical {{lang|de|Was ist Film}} program, preceding [[Leni Riefenstahl]]'s propaganda film ''[[Triumph of the Will]]''.<ref>Turquety 2023, p. 195.</ref> The film is listed in the reference book ''[[1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die]]'', which says "The film's distinctive beauty is due largely to Smith's nimble use of the handheld camera. His unexpected framings yield dense images of fabrics, body parts, and heavily made-up faces."{{sfn|Schneider|2013}}


[[File:Abe fortas hand in air.jpg|thumb|left|upright|alt=Abe Fortas speaking|A screening of ''Flaming Creatures'' was held during the [[Chief Justice of the United States|Chief Justice]] nomination of [[Abe Fortas]] ''(pictured in 1968)''.]]
[[File:Abe fortas hand in air.jpg|thumb|left|upright|alt=Abe Fortas speaking|A screening of ''Flaming Creatures'' was held during the [[Chief Justice of the United States|Chief Justice]] nomination of [[Abe Fortas]] ''(pictured in 1968)''.]]
In 1968, [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] [[Abe Fortas]] was nominated to be [[Chief Justice of the United States]]. Fortas had previously spoken in favor of reversing the original convictions for screening ''Flaming Creatures'', so Senator [[James Eastland]], chairman of the [[Senate Judiciary Committee]], requested that the print seized at the University of Michigan be sent to Washington.<ref>{{cite news |date=July 28, 1968 |title=Film Screening Asked in Inquiry over Fortas |newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]] |page=E6 }}</ref> James Clancy, representing [[Citizens for Decent Literature]], showed the film among other material, inviting senators to view what Fortas had held in several decisions did not constitute obscenity.<ref>Silverstein 2007.</ref> [[Nixon]] adviser [[Pat Buchanan]] credited the effort with ruining Fortas' nomination.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theamericanconservative.com/buchanan/nixon-lbj-and-the-first-shots-in-the-judges-war/ |title=Nixon, LBJ, and the First Shots in the Judges' War |last=Buchanan |first=Pat |authorlink=Pat Buchanan |date=April 7, 2017 |website=[[The American Conservative]] |access-date=December 10, 2017}}</ref>
In 1968, [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]] Abe Fortas was nominated to be Chief Justice of the United States. Fortas had previously spoken in favor of reversing the original convictions for screening ''Flaming Creatures'', so Senator [[James Eastland]], chairman of the [[Senate Judiciary Committee]], requested that the print seized at the University of Michigan be sent to Washington.<ref>{{cite news |date=July 28, 1968 |title=Film Screening Asked in Inquiry over Fortas |newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]] |page=E6 }}</ref> James Clancy, representing [[Citizens for Decent Literature]], showed the film among other material, inviting senators to view what Fortas had held in several decisions did not constitute obscenity.<ref>Silverstein 2007.</ref> [[Nixon]] adviser [[Pat Buchanan]] credited the effort with ruining Fortas' nomination.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theamericanconservative.com/buchanan/nixon-lbj-and-the-first-shots-in-the-judges-war/ |title=Nixon, LBJ, and the First Shots in the Judges' War |last=Buchanan |first=Pat |authorlink=Pat Buchanan |date=April 7, 2017 |website=[[The American Conservative]] |access-date=December 10, 2017}}</ref>


Video artist [[Bec Stupak]], having never seen the original film, created a "remake" of ''Flaming Creatures'' in 2006 based only on descriptions of it.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Hoberman |first=J. |date=September 2011 |title=Jack in the Box |journal=[[Artforum]] |volume=50 |issue=1 |page=95}}</ref> [[Todd Haynes]] alludes to the film with a fictional band named the Flaming Creatures in his 1998 feature ''[[Velvet Goldmine]]''.<ref>Morrison 2007, p. 66.</ref> [[Guy Maddin]]'s 2009 film ''[[The Little White Cloud That Cried (film)|The Little White Cloud That Cried]]'' was conceived as a tribute to ''Flaming Creatures''.<ref>Andrea Grover, [https://glasstire.com/2010/04/27/jack-smith-and-kenneth-angers-love-child/ "Jack Smith and Kenneth Anger's Love Child"]. ''Glasstire'', April 27, 2010.</ref>
Video artist [[Bec Stupak]], having never seen the original film, created a "remake" of ''Flaming Creatures'' in 2006 based only on descriptions of it.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Hoberman |first=J. |author-link=J. Hoberman |date=September 2011 |title=Jack in the Box |journal=[[Artforum]] |volume=50 |issue=1 |page=95}}</ref> [[Todd Haynes]] alludes to the film with a fictional band named the Flaming Creatures in his 1998 feature ''[[Velvet Goldmine]]''.<ref>Morrison 2007, p. 66.</ref> [[Guy Maddin]]'s 2009 film ''[[The Little White Cloud That Cried (film)|The Little White Cloud That Cried]]'' was conceived as a tribute to ''Flaming Creatures''.<ref>Andrea Grover, [https://glasstire.com/2010/04/27/jack-smith-and-kenneth-angers-love-child/ "Jack Smith and Kenneth Anger's Love Child"]. ''Glasstire'', April 27, 2010.</ref>
{{clear}}
{{clear}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}


==See also==
==See also==
*''[[Blonde Cobra]]''
*''[[Blonde Cobra]]''

==References==
{{Reflist}}


==Sources==
==Sources==
Line 102: Line 104:
* {{cite book |last=Sontag |first=Susan |author-link=Susan Sontag |year=2001 |title=Against Interpretation and Other Essays |publisher=[[Picador (imprint)|Picador]] |isbn=978-0-312-28086-4 |url=https://archive.org/details/againstinterpret00sont_0 }}
* {{cite book |last=Sontag |first=Susan |author-link=Susan Sontag |year=2001 |title=Against Interpretation and Other Essays |publisher=[[Picador (imprint)|Picador]] |isbn=978-0-312-28086-4 |url=https://archive.org/details/againstinterpret00sont_0 }}
* {{cite book |last=Suárez |first=Juan A. |year=1996 |title=Bike Boys, Drag Queens, and Superstars |publisher=[[Indiana University Press]] |isbn=978-0-253-32971-4}}
* {{cite book |last=Suárez |first=Juan A. |year=1996 |title=Bike Boys, Drag Queens, and Superstars |publisher=[[Indiana University Press]] |isbn=978-0-253-32971-4}}
* {{cite book |last=Verevis |first=Constantine |year=2020 |title=Flaming Creatures |publisher=[[Columbia University Press]] |isbn=978-0-231-19147-0}}
* {{cite book |last=Turquety |first=Benoît |editor-last1=Hagener |editor-first1=Malte |editor-last2=Zimmermann |editor-first2=Yvonne |year=2023 |title=How Film Histories Were Made: Materials, Methods, Discourses |chapter=A Film-maker's Film Histories |publisher=[[Amsterdam University Press]] |isbn=978-94-6372-406-7
|doi=10.1515/9789048554577}}


==External links==
==External links==
*{{IMDb title|id=0054880|title=Flaming Creatures}}
*{{IMDb title}}
*[http://www.sensesofcinema.com/2002/cteq/flaming/ Flaming Creatures by Constantine Verevis]
*[https://film-makerscoop.com/catalogue/jack-smith-flaming-creatures ''Flaming Creatures''] at [[the Film-Makers' Cooperative]]

*[https://mubi.com/films/flaming-creatures ''Flaming Creatures'' on MUBI]
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:1960s avant-garde and experimental films]]
[[Category:1960s avant-garde and experimental films]]
Line 115: Line 121:
[[Category:American erotic films]]
[[Category:American erotic films]]
[[Category:American LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:American LGBT-related films]]
[[Category:American vampire films]]
[[Category:Censored films]]
[[Category:Censored films]]
[[Category:Cultural depictions of Marilyn Monroe]]
[[Category:Drag (entertainment)-related films]]
[[Category:Drag (entertainment)-related films]]
[[Category:Film censorship in the United States]]
[[Category:Film censorship in the United States]]
[[Category:Film controversies in the United States]]
[[Category:Film controversies in the United States]]
[[Category:Films about earthquakes]]
[[Category:Films about rape]]
[[Category:Films directed by Jack Smith]]
[[Category:Films directed by Jack Smith]]
[[Category:Films shot in New York City]]
[[Category:LGBT-related controversies in film]]
[[Category:LGBT-related controversies in film]]
[[Category:LGBT-related controversies in the United States]]
[[Category:LGBT-related controversies in the United States]]
Line 126: Line 137:
[[Category:1960s English-language films]]
[[Category:1960s English-language films]]
[[Category:1960s American films]]
[[Category:1960s American films]]
[[Category:American vampire films]]
[[Category:Films about earthquakes]]
[[Category:Cultural depictions of Marilyn Monroe]]
[[Category:Films shot in New York City]]
[[Category:Films about rape]]

Revision as of 21:14, 3 April 2024

Flaming Creatures
Theatrical release poster
Directed byJack Smith
Produced byJack Smith
Starring
Distributed byThe Film-Makers' Cooperative
Release date
  • April 29, 1963 (1963-04-29)
Running time
42 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$300

Flaming Creatures is a 1963 American experimental film directed by Jack Smith. The film follows an ensemble of drag performers through several disconnected vignettes, including a lipstick commercial, an orgy, and an earthquake. It was shot on a rooftop on the Lower East Side on a very low budget of only $300, with a soundtrack from Smith's roommate Tony Conrad. It premiered April 29, 1963 at the Bleecker Street Cinema in Greenwich Village.

Because of the film's sexual content, some venues refused to show Flaming Creatures, and in March 1964, police interrupted a screening and seized a print of the film. Jonas Mekas, Ken Jacobs, and Florence Karpf were prosecuted, and the film was ruled to be in violation of New York's obscenity laws. Mekas and critic Susan Sontag mounted a critical defense of Flaming Creatures, and it became a cause célèbre for the New American Cinema movement. Judge Abe Fortas, who had spoken in favor of reversing the convictions, faced scrutiny for his position years later when he was nominated to become Chief Justice of the United States. Flaming Creatures eventually fell out of circulation, and after Smith's death, a restoration was undertaken to preserve the film.

Plot

Most of the film's characters are sexually ambiguous, including transvestite, intersex, and drag performers. Flaming Creatures is largely non-narrative, and its action is often interrupted by cutaways to close-ups of body parts.[1]

The film opens with a credits sequence set to the soundtrack of Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves and the announcement that "Ali Baba comes today!". Two creatures laze in a garden and dance. In what Smith called the "smirching sequence", characters apply lipstick while a mock advertisement poses the question, "Is there lipstick that doesn't come off when you suck cocks?" Two creatures chase each other, and one throws the other to the ground.[2] Several creatures gather around her in a rape scene, which grows into a large orgy. The earth begins to quake, and the creatures collapse.[3]

A vampire resembling Marilyn Monroe climbs out of a coffin and drains some of the lifeless creatures. This reignites the action, and the creatures rise again to dance with one another.[1]

Cast

Mario Montez in drag
Flaming Creatures marked the first film role for Mario Montez (pictured in 2012).[4]
  • Francis Francine as herself
  • Sheila Bick as Delicious Dolores
  • Joel Markman as Our Lady of the Docks
  • Mario Montez as the Spanish girl (credited as Dolores Flores)
  • Arnold Rockwood as Arnold
  • Judith Malina as the Fascinating Woman
  • Marian Zazeela as Maria Zazeela[5]

Production

Smith shared an apartment with artist Marian Zazeela for a period during the early 1960s.[6] He began taking seminude black-and-white photographs with her as a model, along with Francis Francine, Joel Markman, Mario Montez, Arnold Rockwood, and Irving Rosenthal. This grew into The Beautiful Book, a small volume of photographs published with the help of Piero Heliczer. The book began to develop the aesthetic of Flaming Creatures.[7] Smith conceived the idea of making a film to serve as a vehicle for Zazeela. However, she began working with composer La Monte Young and was unable to participate in Smith's project.[6][8] After she moved out, he became roommates with Tony Conrad and replaced Zazeela with Sheila Bick.[9]

Filming of Flaming Creatures took place over eight weekend afternoons in mid to late 1962.[10] Smith held shoots on the roof of the Windsor Theatre, at 412 Grand Street on the Lower East Side.[11] Dick Preston offered his loft above the theatre for use as a prop department and dressing room.[12] Many of the models from The Beautiful Book made appearances in the film. Smith had observed the effects of using out-of-date film working on Ken Jacobs' Star Spangled to Death and decided to use the technique after seeing Ron Rice's The Flower Thief.[13] He used stolen Army surplus Kodak Plus-X reversal film.[14][15] The reels were out-of-date, giving parts of the film a foggy or high-contrast texture.[16]

The film's working title was Pasty Thighs and Moldy Midriffs; Smith also considered using Flaking Moldy Almond Petals, Moldy Rapture, or Horora Femina.[17] He made Flaming Creatures as a way to film "all the funniest stuff he could think of" and depict "different ideas of glamour."[18] He produced the film on a very low budget of $300.[19]

Tony Conrad, with whom Smith shared an apartment, produced the film's soundtrack. The two lived in a building on the Lower East Side, where Angus MacLise lived and into which Montez ended up moving. They held informal group sessions during the evening, which Conrad recorded.[20] The soundtrack, a tape collage,[21] incorporates "Siboney" by Ernesto Lecuona, "Amapola" by Joseph Lacalle, and various pasodobles.[22] Smith began screening unfinished versions of Flaming Creatures to friends. Heliczer held a benefit for the film at painter Jerry Joffen's loft. Mekas discussed a private screening of the film through his column in The Village Voice, and Conrad produced a second version of the soundtrack for the film's theatrical premiere.[23]

Release

Early screenings

Flaming Creatures premiered April 29, 1963 as part of a double feature with Blonde Cobra at the Bleecker Street Cinema in Manhattan, New York. Later screenings were held at the Gramercy Theatre. Because the film had not been submitted for licensing, the shows were free and audiences were asked to donate to the "Love and Kisses for Censors Film Society".[23] Film Culture voted in December 1963 to award Smith its Independent Film Award for the film.[24] It rented the Tivoli Theatre, known for showing sexploitation films, and planned a screening of Flaming Creatures, excerpts from Smith's Normal Love, and Andy Warhol's Newsreel.[24][23] The theatre canceled the event due to the obscene content in Flaming Creatures. Several hundred people gathered at the theatre, and Smith was given his award in an impromptu ceremony.[24] A crowd of several hundred people led by Barbara Rubin occupied the Tivoli until police could clear the building.[25]

At the third Knokke Experimental Film Festival, the selection committee rejected Flaming Creatures out of concern that it fell afoul of Belgium's obscenity laws. In protest, Mekas resigned from the festival jury, and several American filmmakers threatened to withdraw their films.[26] Mekas smuggled in the film in a canister for Stan Brakhage's Dog Star Man and held continuous private screenings out of his hotel. On New Year's Eve, Mekas, Rubin, and P. Adams Sitney forced their way into a projection booth and screened a portion of the film.[26][27]

Obscenity trial and censorship

Jonas Mekas (pictured in 1971) was among those arrested and prosecuted for screening the film.

In February 1964, the Film-Makers' Cinematheque successfully showed the films from the Tivoli program at the New Bowery Theater, as a program titled "Our Infamous Surprise Program". During the program's third showing on March 3, police stopped the event while Flaming Creatures was being screened.[24] They arrested Mekas, Jacobs, Florence Karpf, and Jerry Sims and seized the film reels and projection equipment.[24][28] The police department did not return the only print of Warhol's film, about the making of Normal Love, and it is now considered lost.[24] Mekas held a benefit screening of Un chant d'amour to raise money for a legal defense fund but was arrested again.[29]

Civil rights lawyer Emile Zola Berman accepted the case, believing it would potentially reach the U.S. Supreme Court.[30] Sims, who had been taking tickets, managed to avoid prosecution by claiming he had not seen what was on the screen.[31] People of the State of New York v. Kenneth Jacobs, Florence Karpf and Jonas Mekas was heard on June 12, 1964.[32] As part of the defense, expert testimony came from filmmaker Shirley Clarke, poet Allen Ginsberg, writer Susan Sontag, filmmaker Willard Van Dyke and film historian Herman G. Weinberger.[33][34] The defendants were convicted but given suspended sentences.[32] They appealed on the grounds that the trial had excluded the expert testimony provided. The New York Supreme Court heard the appeal and reversed the convictions. It stated in its opinion that "whatever view this Court might hold as to the obscenity of 'Flaming Creatures,' it is manifest that the appellants herein believe in good faith that the film is not obscene."[35] Fifty years later, the prosecutor for the case issued an apology to Mekas, writing, "Although my appreciation of free expression and aversion to censorship developed more fully as I matured, I should have sooner acted more courageously."[34]

In April 1965, an off-campus screening by students of the University of New Mexico was raided by police, who seized the print. In November 1966, a screening by the UT Austin chapter of Students for a Democratic Society was broken up.[36] A January 1967 screening at the University of Michigan resulted in the confiscation of the film and the arrest of four students, triggering protests and a sit-in by students.[37][38] A screening at the University of Notre Dame at its Pornography and Censorship Conference in 1969 was canceled. When students attempted to screen prohibited films, police interrupted the event, leading to the school's first known violent conflict between police and students.[39][40]

Later history

Smith and Mekas fell out, with Smith accusing Mekas of stealing the original Flaming Creatures print on behalf of Anthology Film Archives.[41][42] Smith was opposed to giving his works a fixed form, preferring to continue re-editing his films.[42] The print was lost until 1978, when Jerry Tartaglia found it in a discarded pile of scrap and returned it to Smith.[43]

It was not until after Smith's death in 1989 that larger institutions started to screen Flaming Creatures.[42] Critic J. Hoberman and performer Penny Arcade saved Smith's belongings and had a restoration of the film made, a project which took five years.[14] The New York Film Festival showed the film in 1991, and the Museum of the Moving Image included it in a 1997 retrospective of Smith's work.[42]

Critical reception

When Flaming Creatures was released in 1963, Film Culture reviewer Ken Kelman described it as a Miltonian "ancient ritual chant…not for the Paradise Lost, but for the Hell Satan gained."[44] In the Saturday Review, Arthur Knight called the film a "faggoty stag-reel ... defiling at once both sex and cinema."[45] Pete Hamill, writing for The Saturday Evening Post, described it as "a sophomoric exercise in the kind of sex that Henry Miller dealt with 30 years ago."[46]

Following the seizure of the film, the director of the Homosexual League of New York called Flaming Creatures "long, disturbing and psychologically unpleasant".[47] Curator Amos Vogel likened it to a film noir that "despite flashes of brilliance and moments of perverse, tortured beauty" was full of "limp genitalia and limp art."[48] Sontag praised the film in a 1966 essay as a "rare modern work of art: it is about joy and innocence."[49] P. Adams Sitney described Flaming Creatures as "a myth of recovered innocence" in which Smith "utterly transforms his sources and uncovers a mythic center from which they had been closed off."[50] Jonathan Rosenbaum called the film "one of the greatest and most pleasurable avant-garde movies ever made".[51] According to The Village Voice Film Guide, Gregory Markopoulos "was only slightly exaggerating when he commented that ... early audiences were astounded when their secret Hollywood fantasies burst upon the screen".[52]

Legacy

Anthology Film Archives placed Flaming Creatures in its Essential Cinema Repertory collection.[53] The Austrian Film Museum included the film in its cyclical Was ist Film program, preceding Leni Riefenstahl's propaganda film Triumph of the Will.[54] The film is listed in the reference book 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die, which says "The film's distinctive beauty is due largely to Smith's nimble use of the handheld camera. His unexpected framings yield dense images of fabrics, body parts, and heavily made-up faces."[55]

Abe Fortas speaking
A screening of Flaming Creatures was held during the Chief Justice nomination of Abe Fortas (pictured in 1968).

In 1968, Associate Justice Abe Fortas was nominated to be Chief Justice of the United States. Fortas had previously spoken in favor of reversing the original convictions for screening Flaming Creatures, so Senator James Eastland, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, requested that the print seized at the University of Michigan be sent to Washington.[56] James Clancy, representing Citizens for Decent Literature, showed the film among other material, inviting senators to view what Fortas had held in several decisions did not constitute obscenity.[57] Nixon adviser Pat Buchanan credited the effort with ruining Fortas' nomination.[58]

Video artist Bec Stupak, having never seen the original film, created a "remake" of Flaming Creatures in 2006 based only on descriptions of it.[59] Todd Haynes alludes to the film with a fictional band named the Flaming Creatures in his 1998 feature Velvet Goldmine.[60] Guy Maddin's 2009 film The Little White Cloud That Cried was conceived as a tribute to Flaming Creatures.[61]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Siegel 1997, p. 95.
  2. ^ Hoberman 2008, pp. 11–7.
  3. ^ Sitney 2002, pp. 335–6.
  4. ^ Rodríguez Martorell, Carlos (March 30, 2010). "Columbia U. holds tribute to Mario Montez, a Boricua drag performer from Warhol's era". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on January 13, 2015.
  5. ^ Hoberman 2008, p. 9.
  6. ^ a b Joseph 2008, p. 231.
  7. ^ Verevis 2020, pp. 17–19.
  8. ^ Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 159.
  9. ^ Hoberman 2008, p. 24.
  10. ^ Verevis 2020, pp. 20.
  11. ^ Hoberman, J. (January 5, 2012). "Up on the Roof". Museum of the Moving Image. Retrieved December 11, 2018.
  12. ^ Hoberman 2008, pp. 25–6.
  13. ^ Sitney 2002, p. 335.
  14. ^ a b All Things Considered (Radio broadcast). NPR. February 20, 2004.
  15. ^ Dixon, Wheeler Winston (1986). "Financing for the Independent Filmmaker: Sources and Strategies". Journal of Film and Video. 38 (1). University of Illinois Press: 31.
  16. ^ Joseph 2008, p. 229.
  17. ^ Hoberman 2008, p. 29.
  18. ^ Siegel, Marc (2014). "Beyond the Rented World: An Introduction". Criticism. 56 (2). Wayne State University Press: 153–7. doi:10.13110/criticism.56.2.0153. S2CID 150673335.
  19. ^ Johnson, Dominic (2014). "Modern Death: Jack Smith, Fred Herko, and Paul Thek". Criticism. 56 (2). Wayne State University Press: 211–34. doi:10.13110/criticism.56.2.0211. S2CID 190819537.
  20. ^ Siegel, Marc (2014). "...For MM". Criticism. 56 (2). Wayne State University Press: 361–74. doi:10.13110/criticism.56.2.0361. S2CID 258057358.
  21. ^ Needs, Kris (August 10, 2016). "Wasn't Born to Follow". Record Collector. Retrieved May 11, 2023.
  22. ^ Suárez, Juan A. (2014). "Jack Smith, Hélio Oiticica, Tropicalism". Criticism. 56 (2). Wayne State University Press: 295–328. doi:10.13110/criticism.56.2.0295. S2CID 190430340.
  23. ^ a b c Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 161.
  24. ^ a b c d e f Angell, Callie (2014). "Batman and Dracula: The Collaborations of Jack Smith and Andy Warhol". Criticism. 56 (2). Wayne State University Press: 159–86. doi:10.13110/criticism.56.2.0159. S2CID 193119573.
  25. ^ Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, pp. 161–2.
  26. ^ a b Broughton, James (1964). "Kokke-le Route". Film Quarterly. 17 (3). University of California Press: 14.
  27. ^ Siegel 1997, p. 91.
  28. ^ "Avant-Garde Movie Seized as Obscene". The New York Times. March 4, 1964. p. 33.
  29. ^ Hoberman and Rosenbaum 1983, p. 60.
  30. ^ Hoberman 2008, p. 44.
  31. ^ MacDonald 1998, p. 375.
  32. ^ a b Hoberman 2008, pp. 44–6.
  33. ^ Pierson 2011, p. 8.
  34. ^ a b Leland, John (October 31, 2015). "The Prosecution Rests in a 1964 Obscenity Case". The New York Times. Retrieved July 4, 2016.
  35. ^ Pierson 2011, p. 20.
  36. ^ Hoberman 2008, p. 46.
  37. ^ Glenn, Alan (April 14, 2010). "The flap over 'Flaming Creatures'". Michigan Today. Retrieved July 4, 2016.
  38. ^ Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, pp. 162–3.
  39. ^ Suárez 1996, p. 183.
  40. ^ Hunt, Tara (2015). "Echoes: The damnedest experience we ever had". Notre Dame Magazine. Retrieved July 4, 2016.
  41. ^ Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 81.
  42. ^ a b c d Matturri, John (2014). "Jack Smith: Notes on Some Homeless Objects". Criticism. 56 (2). Wayne State University Press: 279–94. doi:10.13110/criticism.56.2.0279. S2CID 193350811.
  43. ^ Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 208.
  44. ^ Kelman, Ken (1963). "Smith Myth". Film Culture (29): 5.
  45. ^ Knight, Arthur (1963). "New American Cinema?". Saturday Review: 41.
  46. ^ Hamill, Pete (September 28, 1963). "Explosion in the Movie Underground". The Saturday Evening Post: 83.
  47. ^ Leffingwell, Kismaric & Heiferman 1997, p. 74.
  48. ^ Vogel, Amos (May 7, 1964). "Flaming Creatures Cannot Carry Freedom's Torch". The Village Voice. pp. 9–18.
  49. ^ Sontag 2001, p. 229.
  50. ^ Sitney 2002, pp. 335–7.
  51. ^ Rosenbaum, Jonathan (February 19, 1998). "Sweet Outrage". Chicago Reader. Vol. 27, no. 20. Retrieved July 4, 2016.
  52. ^ Hoberman 2010, p. 115.
  53. ^ "Essential Cinema". Anthology Film Archives. Retrieved June 1, 2022.
  54. ^ Turquety 2023, p. 195.
  55. ^ Schneider 2013.
  56. ^ "Film Screening Asked in Inquiry over Fortas". Los Angeles Times. July 28, 1968. p. E6.
  57. ^ Silverstein 2007.
  58. ^ Buchanan, Pat (April 7, 2017). "Nixon, LBJ, and the First Shots in the Judges' War". The American Conservative. Retrieved December 10, 2017.
  59. ^ Hoberman, J. (September 2011). "Jack in the Box". Artforum. 50 (1): 95.
  60. ^ Morrison 2007, p. 66.
  61. ^ Andrea Grover, "Jack Smith and Kenneth Anger's Love Child". Glasstire, April 27, 2010.

Sources

External links