State election in Bavaria 1924

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1920State election 19241928
 %
40
30th
20th
10
0
32.8
17.2
17.1
9.4
8.3
7.1
3.2
1.2
3.7
VB
Otherwise.
Gains and losses
compared to 1920
 % p
 18th
 16
 14th
 12
 10
   8th
   6th
   4th
   2
   0
  -2
  -4
  -6
  -8th
-10
-6.6
+0.8
+17.1
-4.1
+6.6
-0.8
-4.9
+1.2
-9.3
VB
Otherwise.
Template: election chart / maintenance / notes
Remarks:
d 1920 as Bavarian Middle Party / German People's Party (BMP / DVP)
g 1920 as DDP
           
A total of 129 seats

The third election to the Bavarian State Parliament took place on April 6 and May 4, 1924. Together with the election, a referendum was held on April 6 to reform the constitution of the Free State of Bavaria .

Result

Political party Share of votes Seats
Bavarian People's Party 32.84% 46
Social Democratic Party of Germany 17.17% 23
Völkischer Block ( NSDAP / DVFP ) 17.12% 23
United national rights "VNR" ( DNVP , DVP Pfalz) 9.42% 11
Communist Party of Germany 8.28% 9
Farmers' and Mittelstandsbundes 7.13% 10
German Bloc in Bavaria (DDP) 3.17% 3
Center (Palatinate) 1.16% 1
National Liberal State Party in Bavaria 0.97% 1
Kratofiel Official Group 0.78% 1
Christian Social Party 0.73% 1
Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany 0.09%
Others 1.14%

The big minus for the "other" in the diagram (−22.7) compared to 1920 can be explained in particular by two factors:

consequences

The election campaign was shaped by the Hitler trial . As a result, the extremists won on both sides of the political spectrum: the "Völkische Bloc" made up of the NSDAP and DVFP received 23 seats, and the KPD was able to increase the number of its seats from 2 to 9. The BVP shrank from 65 to 46 seats.

The chairman of the BVP parliamentary group Heinrich Held was elected Prime Minister.

Referendum

Together with the first election day on April 6, 1924, the referendum took place on a far-reaching constitutional amendment. The draft provided for the introduction of a Bavarian President and a second, professionally structured parliamentary chamber. This change had already been proposed by the BVP in the previous state parliament, but had missed the necessary two-thirds majority. In the referendum, with a participation of 70.1%, a majority of 49.3% of those who voted voted against the proposal, 45.4% supported it and 5.3% of the votes cast were invalid.

See also

source