Biopunk: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
added ref for Crache
removed "A place so foreign". Which stories in it are biopunk in particular?
Line 17: Line 17:
*[[Moreau series|''Moreau'' series]] by [[S. Andrew Swann]]
*[[Moreau series|''Moreau'' series]] by [[S. Andrew Swann]]
*''Ribofunk'' by [[Paul Di Filippo]]
*''Ribofunk'' by [[Paul Di Filippo]]
*''[[A Place So Foreign and Eight More]]'' by [[Cory Doctorow]]
*''[[Holy Fire (novel)|Holy Fire]]'' by [[Bruce Sterling]]<ref name="berkcourse">http://rhetoric.berkeley.edu/undergraduate_courses.html</ref>
*''[[Holy Fire (novel)|Holy Fire]]'' by [[Bruce Sterling]]<ref name="berkcourse">http://rhetoric.berkeley.edu/undergraduate_courses.html</ref>
*''[[Signs of Life (novel)]]'' by [[M. John Harrison]]
*''[[Signs of Life (novel)]]'' by [[M. John Harrison]]
⚫
{{col-2}}
*''[[Oryx and Crake]]'' by [[Margaret Atwood]]<ref name="berkcourse"/>
*''[[Oryx and Crake]]'' by [[Margaret Atwood]]<ref name="berkcourse"/>
⚫
{{col-2}}
*''Frek and the Elixir'' by [[Rudy Rucker]]
*''Frek and the Elixir'' by [[Rudy Rucker]]
*''[[Clade (novel)|Clade]]'' and ''Crache'' by [[Mark Budz]]<ref>http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue399/books.html</ref>
*''[[Clade (novel)|Clade]]'' and ''Crache'' by [[Mark Budz]]<ref>http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue399/books.html</ref>

Revision as of 15:26, 13 May 2008

Biopunk (a portmanteau word combining "biotech" and "punk") is a term used to describe:

  1. A hobbyist who experiments with DNA and other aspects of genetics.[1][2]
  2. A science fiction genre that focuses on biotechnology and subversives.[3]
  3. A techno-progressive movement advocating open access to genetic information.[4][5]

Biohacker

Biopunk is a synonym for biohacker, which either demeans or glorifies a hobbyist who experiments with DNA and other aspects of genetics.[6][7] A biohacker is similar to a computer hacker who creates and modifies computer software or computer hardware as a hobby, but should not be confused with a bioterrorist whose sole intent is the deliberate release of viruses, bacteria, or other germs used to cause illness or death in people, animals, or plants (in the same way a computer hacker should not be confused with the more popular use of the term, describing someone who spreads viruses or breaks into computers systems).[8] Using a laptop computer, published gene sequence information, and mail-order synthetic DNA, some advocates and critics of biohacking argue that just about anyone has the potential to construct genes or entire genomes from scratch.[9]

Science fiction genre

Biopunk science fiction is a sub-genre of cyberpunk fiction, which portrays the underground side of the biotech revolution that is believed will start having an impact in the first decades of the 21st century. Biopunk stories explore the struggles of individuals or groups, often the product of human experimentation, against a backdrop of totalitarian governments or megacorporations which misuse biotechnologies as means of social control or profiteering. Unlike cyberpunk, it builds not on information technology but on synthetic biology. Like in postcyberpunk fiction, individuals are usually modified and enhanced not with cyberware, but by genetic manipulation of their very chromosomes.[3] A common feature of biopunk stories is the “black clinic”, which is a lab, clinic or hospital that performs illegal, unregulated or ethically-dubious biomod and gengineering procedures.[10]

One of the prominent writers in this field is Paul Di Filippo, though he called his collection of such stories ribofunk, with the first element being taken from the full name of RNA, ribonucleic acid.[11][3]

Books

Comics and manga

Films

Television

Anime

Computer and video games

Movement

The biopunk movement is a small intellectual and cultural movement, which encompasses a growing number of scientists, artists and cultural critics who are organizing to create public awareness of how human genomic information, produced by bioinformatics, gets used and misused. On the basis of a presumed parallel between genetic and computational code, science journalist Annalee Newitz has called for open-sourcing of genomic databases.[4][5] Biological Innovation for Open Society is an example of an open-source initiative in biotechnology aiming to apply open license for biological innovation.[14]

Self-described "transgenic artist" Eduardo Kac uses biotechnology and genetics to create provocative works that concomitantly revel in scientific techniques and critique them. In what is probably his most famous work, Alba, Kac collaborated with a French laboratory to procure a green-fluorescent rabbit; a rabbit implanted with a green fluorescent protein gene from a type of jellyfish in order for the rabbit to fluoresce green under ultraviolet light.[4] The members of the Critical Art Ensemble have written books and staged multimedia performance interventions around this issue, including The Flesh Machine (focusing on in vitro fertilisation, surveillance of the body, and liberal eugenics) and Cult of the New Eve (analyzing the pseudoreligious discourse around new reproductive technologies).[15] Georgia Tech professor Eugene Thacker leads the Biotech Hobbyist collective, and has written extensively on the field.[16]

References

  1. ^ Katz, J.S.: "Roses are Black, Violets are Green", New Scientist, 6 January, 1990
  2. ^ Katz, J.S.: "That which is not Forbidden is Mandatory", BioTech Educ, 4(1), 1990
  3. ^ a b c Quinion, Michael (1997). "World Wide Words: Biopunk". Retrieved 2007-01-26. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) Cite error: The named reference "Quinion 1997" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  4. ^ a b c Newitz, Annalee (2001). "Biopunk". Retrieved 2007-01-26. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) Cite error: The named reference "Newitz 2001" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  5. ^ a b Newitz, Annalee (2002). "Genome Liberation". Retrieved 2007-01-26. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) Cite error: The named reference "Newitz 2002" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  6. ^ Katz, J.S.: "Roses are Black, Violets are Green", New Scientist, 6 January, 1990
  7. ^ Katz, J.S.: "That which is not Forbidden is Mandatory", BioTech Educ, 4(1), 1990
  8. ^ Schrage, Michael (1988-01-31). "Playing God in Your Basement". The Washington Post. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  9. ^ ETC Group (2007). "Extreme Genetic Engineering: An Introduction to Synthetic Biology" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-02-02. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. ^ Pulver, David L. (1998). GURPS Bio-Tech. Steve Jackson Games. ISBN 1556343361.
  11. ^ Fisher, Jeffrey (1996). "Ribofunk". Retrieved 2007-01-26. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. ^ a b c http://rhetoric.berkeley.edu/undergraduate_courses.html
  13. ^ http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue399/books.html
  14. ^ "BiOS".
  15. ^ "Critical Art Ensemble".
  16. ^ "Biotech Hobbyist Magazine".

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biopunk&oldid=212126649"