Johann von Naszvady

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

John of Naszvady was nobilitierter chair judge (official title for the senior administrative officials and judges in a district) in the County Moson , landowners in Kittsee and Pama .

While researching the life and work of the “ artful ” master stonemason and judge Elias Hügel from the kaysl. Quarry on Leythaberg , Johann Naszvady appears as one of his sons-in-law. He plays a central role in the documents of the longstanding inheritance matter.

Marriage in the Church of Pama

Parish Church of Pama

On July 16, 1752, the extremely wealthy and high-born Mr. Johann von Naszvady , probably appointed chair judge of a commendable Wieselburg Comitat, was married to his noble and honorable bride Anna Catharina Hügelin (born February 14, 1738). Her parents Elias Hügel , master stonemason and judge in the Heyligenkreuzer quarry, and Catharina, had married their daughter Anna Catharina "well". Witnesses were Joseph Piazoll , postmaster, and Franz Antoni Cichini, chief tax collector, both from Wimpassing .

Testament of Elias Hill from the kaysl. Quarry

Hügel, master stonemason from Kaisersteinbruch , wrote in his will on December 22, 1754 under eight:

  • My three children, namely Catharina, married Mr. Johann Naszvady, Anna Maria and Anna Theresia, and I will give eight thousand guilders each , so that my two youngest daughters under the tutelage of their mother and my dear son-in-law , Mr. Johann Naszvady a Löbl. Wieselburger Comitates of well appointed chair judges until the Most High shows them a happy marriage. But if someone wants to go to a monastery , three thousand guilders are to be given to the monastery from her capital ...

Codicill or other disposition

In a codicill of March 20, 1755, Hügel decreed:

.. even my master's son has Johann Naszvady two thousand ... my love marriage Consortin guilders in addition to the 5 per Cento ongoing interest to pay back
Johann Stephan Priegelbauer, Count Mercyscher Wirtschafter zu Prugg an der Leytha as a requested witness
Johann Baptist Regondi , fellow neighbor and master stonemason alda, as a requested witness

Inheritance

After Hügel's death on August 22, 1755, the following is found in the estate of October 13, 1755 (only concerning Johann Naszvady):

Cash and securitized debts

  • Mr. Johann Naszvady is guilty of 5 per cent interest No. 4 .. 600 guilders
  • Mrs. Catharina, married Mr. Naszvady received No. 1 .. 8,000 guilders
  • a lapel of Mr. Naszvady from May 21st, by means of which Mr. Attestant certifies that he was entrusted with 6 bonds .. 21,500 guilders
  • then Mr. Naszvady declares that Mr. Jerszenak has an obligation of 4,000 guilders, of which two, described in the reverse and present, he will lay his vocation ...
then Mr. Johann Naszvady has the ability to pay the widow's Codizill 2,000 guilders.

It was noticed that the rulers could suffer disadvantages from the will as well as from the unpaid departure fee . So it was considered necessary to communicate the following decree to the parties of the rule.

Left which was given to the widow Catharina Hüglin by the government

  • Of the eight thousand guilders, which the named hill gave to his daughter, wife Catharina, married Naszvady zu Pama, in disregard of the right to rule, according to an ancient custom, as an Urbario , as departure money of every guilder, 5 cruisers from the aforementioned women Naszvady belong 400 guilders. The should be hunted by November 8, 1755 at the rule of the royal court .
  • The widow as a universal heir should seek recourse from her wife's daughter.
  • According to the will, Hügel had handed over the guardianship of his 2 unmarried daughters Anna Maria and Anna Theresia to Mr. Johann Naszvady and thus withdrew from the lordly jurisdiction , thus the rule itself reserved the guardianship, to which it is legally due.
  • The marriage contract between Hügel's daughter Catharina and Mr Naszvady, concluded without a lordly ratification , is " contrary to the old lordly rights, completely dismissed, held to zero and invalid ".
  • According to Codicill, the two thousand guilders due to the widow Catharina, which noble Mr. Johann Naszvady is supposed to repay the said widow and his interest , but which Selber does not want to be comfortable with. If she will take legal action against Mr. Naszvady and seek permission and authority from gracious authorities, she will receive it.

In contrast to her two married daughters and son-in-law Johann Naszvady, the widow Catharina Hügelin was “tangible” for the rule. Therefore, the fees that were not paid at the time - because marriages took place outside the domain - are deducted from their inheritance. According to Master Hügel's Codicill, Mr. Naszvady was obliged to repay 2,000 guilders to his mother-in-law. But since he does not want that, the rule of the royal court refers the widow Hügelin “to legal recourse” in this case as well.

The Hilless widow remarries

On December 21, 1755, the noble wife Catharina, widowed hill woman, married the well-born and highly learned Mr. Franz Frid, Philia et Medicina Doctorem of Vienna , in the Kaisersteinbruch Church . From the available documents one could assume that the Hügel family was totally at odds with the execution of the will. It may be that they are all united in this marriage, the sons-in-law, Johann von Naszvady and Franz Antoni Cichini, appear as witnesses.

Day of the judicial execution

Mr. Valentin Trummer, judge in the Comitat Wieselburg (successor of Naszvady?) And Martin Staindl, clerk at the Königshof confirmed that on February 7, 1764 in the Heiligenkreuz quarry a hearing against the well-born Mr. Johann von Naszvady and Mr. Franciscus Antonius von Cichini (Hügels second Son-in-law) was held.

On November 13, 1765, according to a royal resolution , the following execution was carried out and carried out at the request of the rule Königahof fiscal . ... But while nobody from the opposing party appeared, neither by themselves nor by a proxy, so I ... handed over the remainder with 4,120 guilders to the well-born Valentin Trummer, the best-appointed judge.

List of taxpayers in quarry 1768

The aristocratic chair judge in Moson Comitat Johann von Naszvady signed the list of taxpayers in quarry on November 18, 1768 , thereby making it effective.

Petrus Zierl master baker, Johann Gehmacher master stonemason, Christian Binder stately hunter to the royal court , Adam Wittmann master meat chopper , Rosalia gentnerin shoemaker- widow, Joseph Stockmayer master stonemason, Johann Michael Strickner master stonemason, Catharina Moserin widow, Franciscus abbot stately hunter to the royal court, Franciscus Steinmetzler Maria Rummelin journeyman stonemason widow, Jacob Margl master blacksmith , Johann Pekundt journeyman bricklayer , Antonius Felber journeyman stonemason, Michael Weidbacher journeyman stonemason, Adam Paumann master tailor , Adalbert Illinger master weaver , Leopold Cassar master mason, Joseph Annon journeyman stonemason, Anna Maria department store woman widow journeyman stonemason , Johann Schád cloth maker , Gregor Nagl master weaver.

Land of quarry

On December 17, 1772 was Urbarium of quarry of magistrate Johann Naszvady erected and signed by him. The judge at the time in the quarry was Johann Gehmacher .

The text was preprinted for all parishes with space for handwritten additions. Exactly the duties to the rulership are described here, especially the peculiarity: ... the residents here can only be regarded as housed persons , since the residents have not provided their own forests or pipes, nor their own land on the part of the rulers on theirs The same is permitted. They are also not guilty of the same servitude . The pasture here concerning location, is same to a year to be paid 6 Gulden on the noble pasture after arbitrary further permits.

Division into the chapters:

  • From provisions of the residents
  • From beneficiis their subjects
  • Of robots and services of their subjects
  • About the gifts and other attachments
  • About the ninth and the mining law
  • From those who are right and upright of the landlords
  • Of those abuses and excesses that have been repealed and are to be avoided in the future
  • Of that which the subject is forbidden, and of the penalties imposed on it
  • Of that, so belonging to the internal arrangement.

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. ^ Diocesan archives Eisenstadt, marriage book of the parish church in Pama
  2. Mosonmagyaróvár county archive , probate proceedings of the court stonemason Elias Hügel, court proceedings: on the matter a letter from Empress Maria Theresa.
  3. Helmuth Furch , Elias Hügel Hofsteinmetzmeister, marriage Johann Naszvady - Catharina Hügelin , p. 108. Testament of Elias Hügel . Pp. 109-112. Kaisersteinbruch 1992/2015. ISBN 978-3-9504555-2-6 .
  4. URL: https://regiowiki.at/index.php?title=Abfahrtsgeld_aus_Kaisersteinbruch&oldid=253083
  5. URL: https://regiowiki.at/index.php?title=Franz_Antoni_Cichini&oldid=125467
  6. ^ Archives Mosonmagyaróvár
  7. Maria Theresa Urbarium
  8. Neuntel and Bergrecht: The payment of the ninth, the ninth part of the income from the Extravillanum, from beehives, lambs, kids, hemp and flax was partly payable in kind, partly in the remuneration value. In some places the ninth was also paid from wine. The more common tax that a vineyard owner had to deliver annually to the landlord was called mining law and was agreed between the planter and landlord. Now the Pressburg bucket was prescribed as a uniform national measure and an increase in mining law was prohibited. Although the tithe, originally the payment to the clergy, did not belong to the land registry, it was decreed that it could only be taken from crops, wine, lambs, bees, millet, grain, barley and oats.