Syrup particles

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A syrup after which syrup particles are named.

In Switzerland, the term syrup article refers to a kind of legal article at cantonal level, which serves alcohol prevention and in which providers of alcoholic beverages are obliged to offer cheaper non-alcoholic beverages.

Although the name sounds casual - it refers to syrup in the sense of a harmless drink for children - it is used both in official language and in specialist literature, so it is a terminus technicus . For example, both the Federal Office of Public Health and the commentary on Bernese administrative law (“For health reasons, Bernese law also contains the so-called syrup article”) use the term.

Legal basis

According to Swiss law, the cantons are responsible for all areas for which the Confederation has not expressly declared itself responsible (Art. 3 BV ). Due to the lack of federal competence, the cantons are therefore responsible for the field of alcohol prevention.

Due to the cantonal competence, the measures applied in the area of ​​alcohol prevention are correspondingly diverse and differ from canton to canton. However, there are some similarities, such as the syrup particles in particular.

Design

The syrup article obliges hosts to offer a certain number of non-alcoholic drinks cheaper than the cheapest alcoholic drink with the same quantity. On the one hand, price dumping in the area of ​​alcohol sales should generally be reduced. On the other hand, consumers  - especially young people  - should not be tempted to consume alcohol just for cost reasons.

The specific design varies from canton to canton - some cantons have no such regulation at all. However, the obligation to offer three cheaper non-alcoholic drinks is widespread. For example, Article 28 of the Bernese Hospitality Act (GGG) stipulates:

"Alcoholic hospitality businesses have to offer at least three non-alcoholic drinks cheaper than the cheapest alcoholic drink in the same quantity."

Overview of the cantonal regulations

The following is an overview of the applicable rules, broken down by cantons:

Content of the syrup particles by canton
Canton regulation Number of non-alcoholic drinks Remarks
Kanton AargauKanton Aargau Aargau Yes a selection
Canton of Appenzell InnerrhodenCanton of Appenzell Innerrhoden Appenzell Innerrhoden Yes a selection
Canton of Appenzell AusserrhodenCanton of Appenzell Ausserrhoden Appenzell Ausserrhoden Yes at least 3
Canton BernCanton Bern Bern Yes at least 3
Canton of Basel-CountryCanton of Basel-Country Basel-Country Yes at least 2
Canton of Basel-StadtCanton of Basel-Stadt Basel city Yes at least 3
Canton of FriborgCanton of Friborg Freiburg Yes at least 3
Canton of GenevaCanton of Geneva Geneva Yes at least 3 Reference to non-alcoholic offer
Canton of GlarusCanton of Glarus Glarus No
canton of Grisonscanton of Grisons Grisons Yes a selection
Canton of JuraCanton of Jura law Yes at least 3
Canton lucerneCanton lucerne Lucerne Yes at least 3
Canton of NeuchâtelCanton of Neuchâtel Neuchâtel Yes at least 3 Reference to non-alcoholic offer
Canton of NidwaldenCanton of Nidwalden Nidwalden Yes a selection
Canton of ObwaldenCanton of Obwalden Obwalden Yes a selection
Canton of St. GallenCanton of St. Gallen St. Gallen Yes at least 3
Canton of SchaffhausenCanton of Schaffhausen Schaffhausen Yes a selection
Canton of SolothurnCanton of Solothurn Solothurn Yes at least 3
Canton of SchwyzCanton of Schwyz Schwyz No
Canton of ThurgauCanton of Thurgau Thurgau No
Canton of TicinoCanton of Ticino Ticino Yes at least 3
Canton of UriCanton of Uri Uri Yes a selection
Canton of VaudCanton of Vaud Vaud Yes at least 3 Reference to non-alcoholic offer
Canton of ValaisCanton of Valais Valais Yes a selection
Canton of ZugCanton of Zug train No
Canton ZurichCanton Zurich Zurich Yes a selection

(As of June 8, 2017; Source: Federal Office of Public Health )

bibliography

Individual evidence

  1. a b Syrup Article. In: Website of the Federal Office of Public Health. May 5, 2017. Retrieved June 8, 2017 .
  2. ^ Müller / Feller: Bernese administrative law. 2008, p. 713.