Wikipedia talk:Template index/Cleanup and Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/South American military history articles by quality/1: Difference between pages
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
Robert K S (talk | contribs) |
WP 1.0 bot (talk | contribs) Update for October 13, 2008 (test code) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
|||
{{shortcut|WT:TC|WT:TMC}} |
|||
{{archive box|# [[Wikipedia talk:Template messages/Cleanup/Archive 1|2005 - 2006]]}} |
|||
<noinclude> |
|||
== Capitalization Tag == |
|||
{{process header |
|||
| title = ↑[[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/South American military history articles by quality|(up)]] |
|||
| section = |
|||
| previous = ← (prev) |
|||
| next = [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/South American military history articles by quality/2|(next)]] → |
|||
| shortcut = |
|||
| notes = |
|||
}}</noinclude> |
|||
<noinclude>== [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/South American military history task force]] ==</noinclude> |
|||
{{assessment header|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/South American military history task force|WP Military history/South American military history task force}} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[HMS Cardiff (D108)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Cardiff_%28D108%29&oldid=221676320 ] | importance= | date=June 25, 2008 | class={{FA-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military history of Puerto Rico]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_history_of_Puerto_Rico&oldid=119495053 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{FA-Class}} | version=0.5 | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[TAM (tank)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TAM_%28tank%29&oldid=232401225 ] | importance= | date=August 21, 2008 | class={{A-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Ollantaytambo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Ollantaytambo&oldid=228346489 ] | importance= | date=August 3, 2008 | class={{GA-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Secretaría de Inteligencia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Secretar%c3%ada_de_Inteligencia&oldid=235183879 ] | importance= | date=September 9, 2008 | class={{GA-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Shining Path]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shining_Path&oldid=207672361 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{GA-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1964 Brazilian coup d'état]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1964_Brazilian_coup_d%27%c3%a9tat&oldid=155507335 ] | importance= | date=September 7, 2007 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1982 invasion of the Falkland Islands]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1982_invasion_of_the_Falkland_Islands&oldid=122513782 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[2002 Venezuelan coup d'état attempt]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2002_Venezuelan_coup_d%27%c3%a9tat_attempt&oldid=206696229 ] | importance= | date=April 22, 2008 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[2004 Haitian rebellion]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2004_Haitian_rebellion&oldid=207942082 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA General Belgrano]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_General_Belgrano&oldid=195759838 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Santísima Trinidad (1948)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Sant%c3%adsima_Trinidad_%281948%29&oldid=196990786 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Abimael Guzmán]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abimael_Guzm%c3%a1n&oldid=178441024 ] | importance= | date=December 26, 2007 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_Army&oldid=179576848 ] | importance= | date=December 26, 2007 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine air forces in the Falklands War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_air_forces_in_the_Falklands_War&oldid=198386891 ] | importance= | date=March 22, 2008 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Che Guevara]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Che_Guevara&oldid=218123591 ] | importance= | date=June 11, 2008 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Colombian armed conflict (1964–present)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombian_armed_conflict_%281964%e2%80%93present%29&oldid=234118647 ] | importance= | date=September 17, 2008 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Dirty War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dirty_War&oldid=122458300 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Falklands War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falklands_War&oldid=122474984 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Fulgencio Batista]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fulgencio_Batista&oldid=211597818 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[GADA 601]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GADA_601&oldid=212972666 ] | importance= | date=May 18, 2008 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Sovereignty of the Falkland Islands]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sovereignty_of_the_Falkland_Islands&oldid=157548319 ] | importance= | date=September 18, 2007 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Tanquetazo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tanquetazo&oldid=171205496 ] | importance= | date=December 14, 2007 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Springer (SS-414)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Springer_%28SS-414%29&oldid=152594081 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{B-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1898 invasion of Guantánamo Bay]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1898_invasion_of_Guant%c3%a1namo_Bay&oldid=208506709 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1925 Chilean coup d'état]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1925_Chilean_coup_d%27%c3%a9tat&oldid=197729198 ] | importance= | date=March 27, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1954 Guatemalan coup d'état]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1954_Guatemalan_coup_d%27%c3%a9tat&oldid=164316703 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1973 Chilean coup d'état]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1973_Chilean_coup_d%27%c3%a9tat&oldid=207691587 ] | importance= | date=September 24, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1999–2002 FARC-Government peace process]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1999%e2%80%932002_FARC-Government_peace_process&oldid=160814193 ] | importance= | date=September 27, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[3rd Division of the Colombian National Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=3rd_Division_of_the_Colombian_National_Army&oldid=208035811 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[57 mm AZP S-60]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=57_mm_AZP_S-60&oldid=127829974 ] | importance= | date=May 8, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[5th Naval Infantry Battalion (Argentina)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=5th_Naval_Infantry_Battalion_%28Argentina%29&oldid=164753146 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[601 Air Assault Regiment]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=601_Air_Assault_Regiment&oldid=167535741 ] | importance= | date=November 21, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[7.5 cm FK 38]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7.5_cm_FK_38&oldid=197824898 ] | importance= | date=March 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[A-4AR Fightinghawk]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A-4AR_Fightinghawk&oldid=121871824 ] | importance= | date=April 16, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[AMX International AMX]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AMX_International_AMX&oldid=207832297 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Almirante Irízar (Q-5)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Almirante_Ir%c3%adzar_%28Q-5%29&oldid=190917759 ] | importance= | date=August 8, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA La Argentina]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_La_Argentina&oldid=159440101 ] | importance= | date=December 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Libertad (Q-2)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Libertad_%28Q-2%29&oldid=183181972 ] | importance= | date=February 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Santa Fe (S-21)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Santa_Fe_%28S-21%29&oldid=119698951 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Veinticinco de Mayo (V-2)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Veinticinco_de_Mayo_%28V-2%29&oldid=159444617 ] | importance= | date=October 3, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[AS-25K]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AS-25K&oldid=179665953 ] | importance= | date=December 23, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Academia Militar de Agulhas Negras]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Academia_Militar_de_Agulhas_Negras&oldid=179687547 ] | importance= | date=January 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Agrupación Aérea Presidencial]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agrupaci%c3%b3n_A%c3%a9rea_Presidencial&oldid=188541683 ] | importance= | date=February 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Agrupación de Fuerzas Especiales Antiterroristas Urbanas]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agrupaci%c3%b3n_de_Fuerzas_Especiales_Antiterroristas_Urbanas&oldid=204625173 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Agustín Pedro Justo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agust%c3%adn_Pedro_Justo&oldid=183877663 ] | importance= | date=January 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Alfredo Ovando Candía]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alfredo_Ovando_Cand%c3%ada&oldid=211214467 ] | importance= | date=June 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Alférez]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alf%c3%a9rez&oldid=223980551 ] | importance= | date=August 8, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Almirante Clemente class destroyer]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Almirante_Clemente_class_destroyer&oldid=205855908 ] | importance= | date=April 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Almirante Lynch class destroyer]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Almirante_Lynch_class_destroyer&oldid=161549230 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Anastasio Bustamante]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anastasio_Bustamante&oldid=231842489 ] | importance= | date=August 26, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Andrés de Santa Cruz]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andr%c3%a9s_de_Santa_Cruz&oldid=228793527 ] | importance= | date=August 26, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Antonio José de Sucre]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antonio_Jos%c3%a9_de_Sucre&oldid=228642783 ] | importance= | date=August 26, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Antonio Maceo Grajales]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antonio_Maceo_Grajales&oldid=225730798 ] | importance= | date=August 26, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Antonio Valero de Bernabe]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antonio_Valero_de_Bernabe&oldid=232172394 ] | importance= | date=August 26, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Antonio de los Reyes Correa]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antonio_de_los_Reyes_Correa&oldid=230752221 ] | importance= | date=August 26, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Arauco War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arauco_War&oldid=171096828 ] | importance= | date=November 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentina–Brazil War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentina%e2%80%93Brazil_War&oldid=118517626 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine Air Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_Air_Force&oldid=121318273 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine Anticommunist Alliance]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_Anticommunist_Alliance&oldid=164937836 ] | importance= | date=October 31, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine Army enlisted rank insignia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_Army_enlisted_rank_insignia&oldid=178895030 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine Army officer rank insignia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_Army_officer_rank_insignia&oldid=188889734 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine Nation to the Heroic Valour in Combat Cross]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_Nation_to_the_Heroic_Valour_in_Combat_Cross&oldid=169692604 ] | importance= | date=May 28, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine Navy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_Navy&oldid=122455628 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine War of Independence]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_War_of_Independence&oldid=215911835 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine ground forces in the Falklands War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_ground_forces_in_the_Falklands_War&oldid=195168337 ] | importance= | date=March 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Argentine naval forces in the Falklands War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argentine_naval_forces_in_the_Falklands_War&oldid=199901848 ] | importance= | date=March 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Ariostazo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ariostazo&oldid=239689113 ] | importance= | date=October 13, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Armed Forces of the Argentine Republic]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Armed_Forces_of_the_Argentine_Republic&oldid=209152960 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[BAP Angamos (SS-31)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BAP_Angamos_%28SS-31%29&oldid=157196709 ] | importance= | date=December 20, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[BAP Apurimac]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BAP_Apurimac&oldid=225217562 ] | importance= | date=July 13, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[BAP Ferré (DM-74)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BAP_Ferr%c3%a9_%28DM-74%29&oldid=202280956 ] | importance= | date=May 14, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[BAP Palacios (DM-73)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BAP_Palacios_%28DM-73%29&oldid=202281011 ] | importance= | date=May 14, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[BINCI]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BINCI&oldid=145211475 ] | importance= | date=June 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Background to the Falklands War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Background_to_the_Falklands_War&oldid=158514731 ] | importance= | date=April 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Bartolomé Mitre]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bartolom%c3%a9_Mitre&oldid=166782634 ] | importance= | date=November 9, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Batalhão de Operações Policiais Especiais]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Batalh%c3%a3o_de_Opera%c3%a7%c3%b5es_Policiais_Especiais&oldid=172686899 ] | importance= | date=November 21, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Acosta Ñu]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Acosta_%c3%91u&oldid=171129573 ] | importance= | date=December 23, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Aguadulce]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Aguadulce&oldid=160601572 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Araure]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Araure&oldid=162639886 ] | importance= | date=March 31, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Arica]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Arica&oldid=167382825 ] | importance= | date=November 18, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Ayohuma]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Ayohuma&oldid=171160869 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Cajamarca]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Cajamarca&oldid=202604591 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Callao]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Callao&oldid=209942861 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Chorrillos]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Chorrillos&oldid=201973413 ] | importance= | date=March 31, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Iquique]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Iquique&oldid=197590512 ] | importance= | date=March 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Ituzaingó]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Ituzaing%C3%B3&oldid=121403224 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Monterrey]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Monterrey&oldid=168819468 ] | importance= | date=November 7, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Mount Harriet]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Mount_Harriet&oldid=210382834 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Mount Longdon]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Mount_Longdon&oldid=210668695 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Pichincha]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Pichincha&oldid=164769397 ] | importance= | date=December 29, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Seal Cove]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Seal_Cove&oldid=205447642 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Top Malo House]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Top_Malo_House&oldid=143383900 ] | importance= | date=July 10, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Tuyutí]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Tuyut%c3%ad&oldid=171129622 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Two Sisters]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Two_Sisters&oldid=199783843 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Wireless Ridge]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Wireless_Ridge&oldid=205205003 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Battle of Yungay]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Yungay&oldid=209668324 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Bernardo O'Higgins]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bernardo_O%27Higgins&oldid=163951380 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Bojayá massacre]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bojay%c3%a1_massacre&oldid=160813703 ] | importance= | date=September 27, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Bolivarian Armada of Venezuela]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bolivarian_Armada_of_Venezuela&oldid=148353941 ] | importance= | date=July 31, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Bolívar in New Granada]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bol%c3%advar_in_New_Granada&oldid=188233286 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Bolívar's War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bol%c3%advar%27s_War&oldid=201820627 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Brazil and weapons of mass destruction]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazil_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction&oldid=167362636 ] | importance= | date=October 28, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Brazilian Air Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_Air_Force&oldid=160914181 ] | importance= | date=October 11, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Brazilian Armed Forces]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_Armed_Forces&oldid=161358692 ] | importance= | date=October 11, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Brazilian Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_Army&oldid=123172260 ] | importance= | date=April 20, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Brazilian Army Aviation Command]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_Army_Aviation_Command&oldid=216440182 ] | importance= | date=June 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Brazilian Expeditionary Force (FEB)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_Expeditionary_Force_%28FEB%29&oldid=131315256 ] | importance= | date=April 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Brazilian Navy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_Navy&oldid=210176563 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Brazilian battleship São Paulo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brazilian_battleship_S%c3%a3o_Paulo&oldid=159845976 ] | importance= | date=November 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Brooklyn class cruiser]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brooklyn_class_cruiser&oldid=175281775 ] | importance= | date=December 3, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CIA activities in Argentina]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIA_activities_in_Argentina&oldid=208709513 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CIA activities in Bolivia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIA_activities_in_Bolivia&oldid=208710156 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CIA activities in Brazil]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIA_activities_in_Brazil&oldid=208926780 ] | importance= | date=June 8, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CIA activities in Chile]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIA_activities_in_Chile&oldid=208706562 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CIA activities in Colombia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIA_activities_in_Colombia&oldid=208709068 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CIA activities in Honduras]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIA_activities_in_Honduras&oldid=208710727 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CIA activities in Nicaragua]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIA_activities_in_Nicaragua&oldid=208706220 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CIA activities in Peru]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIA_activities_in_Peru&oldid=208710314 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CIA activities in Venezuela]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CIA_activities_in_Venezuela&oldid=208706137 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[CITER 155mm L33 Gun]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CITER_155mm_L33_Gun&oldid=180913788 ] | importance= | date=January 2, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Calfucurá]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Calfucur%c3%a1&oldid=233120774 ] | importance= | date=September 24, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Caribbean Bloc of the FARC-EP]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caribbean_Bloc_of_the_FARC-EP&oldid=176230948 ] | importance= | date=December 9, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Carlos Ibáñez del Campo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carlos_Ib%c3%a1%c3%b1ez_del_Campo&oldid=239306483 ] | importance= | date=September 24, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Cayenne Battery]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cayenne_Battery&oldid=230208930 ] | importance= | date=August 12, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Chaco War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chaco_War&oldid=209281977 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Chilean Air Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chilean_Air_Force&oldid=162059004 ] | importance= | date=October 3, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Chilean Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chilean_Army&oldid=151662196 ] | importance= | date=August 16, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Chilean Navy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chilean_Navy&oldid=152432796 ] | importance= | date=August 19, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Chilean War of Independence]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chilean_War_of_Independence&oldid=217277145 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Colombia Three]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombia_Three&oldid=171904750 ] | importance= | date=March 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Colombian Air Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombian_Air_Force&oldid=211502018 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Colombian Civil War (1860–1862)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombian_Civil_War_%281860%e2%80%931862%29&oldid=218809836 ] | importance= | date=September 17, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Colombian National Armada]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colombian_National_Armada&oldid=166506601 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Commandant Rivière class frigate]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commandant_Rivi%c3%a8re_class_frigate&oldid=220303367 ] | importance= | date=June 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Cooperation System of the American Air Forces]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cooperation_System_of_the_American_Air_Forces&oldid=220592632 ] | importance= | date=September 24, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Corps of Naval Fusiliers]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corps_of_Naval_Fusiliers&oldid=222174053 ] | importance= | date=July 2, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Corvo (knife)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Corvo_%28knife%29&oldid=234624952 ] | importance= | date=September 17, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Cultural impact of the Falklands War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cultural_impact_of_the_Falklands_War&oldid=173617781 ] | importance= | date=December 20, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[D'Estienne d'Orves class]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=D%27Estienne_d%27Orves_class&oldid=194639546 ] | importance= | date=March 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[De Zeven Provinciën class cruiser]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=De_Zeven_Provinci%c3%abn_class_cruiser&oldid=146586081 ] | importance= | date=December 14, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Drummond class corvette]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Drummond_class_corvette&oldid=158982201 ] | importance= | date=December 9, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Ecuadorian Air Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ecuadorian_Air_Force&oldid=149429690 ] | importance= | date=August 16, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Ecuadorian Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ecuadorian_Army&oldid=209480701 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Ecuadorian War of Independence]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ecuadorian_War_of_Independence&oldid=215191871 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Ecuadorian–Peruvian War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ecuadorian%e2%80%93Peruvian_War&oldid=214777627 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Eduardo Abaroa]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eduardo_Abaroa&oldid=226861393 ] | importance= | date=September 29, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Efraín Ríos Montt]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Efra%c3%adn_R%c3%ados_Montt&oldid=143563520 ] | importance= | date=July 16, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Eleazar López Contreras]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eleazar_L%c3%b3pez_Contreras&oldid=168888484 ] | importance= | date=December 3, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Eliseo Payán]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eliseo_Pay%c3%a1n&oldid=156075023 ] | importance= | date=November 18, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Embraer EMB 312 Tucano]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embraer_EMB_312_Tucano&oldid=236587319 ] | importance= | date=September 9, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embraer_EMB_314_Super_Tucano&oldid=236432329 ] | importance= | date=September 9, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Emilio Kosterlitzky]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emilio_Kosterlitzky&oldid=152197481 ] | importance= | date=December 17, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Escuadrón Fénix]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Escuadr%c3%b3n_F%c3%a9nix&oldid=101453638 ] | importance= | date=January 21, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Espora class frigate]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Espora_class_frigate&oldid=221027151 ] | importance= | date=June 25, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Events leading to the Falklands War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Events_leading_to_the_Falklands_War&oldid=185947989 ] | importance= | date=January 21, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[FAD assault rifle]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FAD_assault_rifle&oldid=225916049 ] | importance= | date=July 16, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[FARA 83]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FARA_83&oldid=148581157 ] | importance= | date=August 7, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[FMA IA 50 Guaraní II]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FMA_IA_50_Guaran%c3%ad_II&oldid=163156538 ] | importance= | date=October 28, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[FMA IA 58 Pucará]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FMA_IA_58_Pucar%C3%A1&oldid=121070979 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[FMA IA 63 Pampa]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FMA_IA_63_Pampa&oldid=152306180 ] | importance= | date=August 31, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FMA_IAe_33_Pulqui_II&oldid=115817486 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[FMA SAIA 90]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FMA_SAIA_90&oldid=183090234 ] | importance= | date=February 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Falkland Islands Defence Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falkland_Islands_Defence_Force&oldid=155902175 ] | importance= | date=September 15, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Falklands War Argentine surrender]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Falklands_War_Argentine_surrender&oldid=166248849 ] | importance= | date=February 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Fanaero-Chile Chincol]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fanaero-Chile_Chincol&oldid=196908605 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Fatherland and Liberty]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fatherland_and_Liberty&oldid=232406267 ] | importance= | date=September 24, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[First Battle of Rivas]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Battle_of_Rivas&oldid=202988773 ] | importance= | date=April 6, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[First European colonization wave (15th century–19th century)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_European_colonization_wave_%2815th_century%e2%80%9319th_century%29&oldid=205956485 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Flower war]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flower_war&oldid=209547004 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Football War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Football_War&oldid=209971543 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Fort of São João do Arade]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fort_of_S%c3%a3o_Jo%c3%a3o_do_Arade&oldid=209762861 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Francisco Bolognesi]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francisco_Bolognesi&oldid=155091926 ] | importance= | date=November 30, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Gildardo Magaña]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gildardo_Maga%c3%b1a&oldid=167059926 ] | importance= | date=December 3, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Guatemalan Civil War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guatemalan_Civil_War&oldid=211070453 ] | importance= | date=May 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Guillermo Suárez Mason]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guillermo_Su%c3%a1rez_Mason&oldid=173278343 ] | importance= | date=December 20, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Gustavo Leigh]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gustavo_Leigh&oldid=211528529 ] | importance= | date=May 28, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Guyana Defence Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guyana_Defence_Force&oldid=211383340 ] | importance= | date=May 28, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[HMS Glamorgan (D19)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Glamorgan_%28D19%29&oldid=207793345 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[HMS Marlborough (F233)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Marlborough_%28F233%29&oldid=203145378 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[HMS Newfoundland (59)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Newfoundland_%2859%29&oldid=203801811 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[HMS Norfolk (D21)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Norfolk_%28D21%29&oldid=205603361 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[HMS Norfolk (F230)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Norfolk_%28F230%29&oldid=219113923 ] | importance= | date=June 29, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[HMS Sheffield (F96)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Sheffield_%28F96%29&oldid=222020898 ] | importance= | date=June 29, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[HMS Warrior (R31)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Warrior_%28R31%29&oldid=119729764 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Haydée Tamara Bunke Bider]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hayd%c3%a9e_Tamara_Bunke_Bider&oldid=163287147 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[History Will Absolve Me]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_Will_Absolve_Me&oldid=168835809 ] | importance= | date=March 27, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Holland 602 type submarine]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Holland_602_type_submarine&oldid=161137947 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Huáscar (ship)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hu%c3%a1scar_%28ship%29&oldid=161800580 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[I.Ae. 24 Calquin]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I.Ae._24_Calquin&oldid=193454754 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[I.Ae. 27 Pulqui I]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I.Ae._27_Pulqui_I&oldid=150383671 ] | importance= | date=November 27, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[IAI Nesher]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IAI_Nesher&oldid=202918392 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[IAe.22 DL]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IAe.22_DL&oldid=163554706 ] | importance= | date=November 21, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Inca Civil War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inca_Civil_War&oldid=233670999 ] | importance= | date=September 14, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Intelligence Oversight Board Report on Guatemala]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Intelligence_Oversight_Board_Report_on_Guatemala&oldid=219371609 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Inter-American Defense College]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inter-American_Defense_College&oldid=214349123 ] | importance= | date=May 25, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Internal conflict in Peru]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Internal_conflict_in_Peru&oldid=115764845 ] | importance= | date=March 31, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Joaquín Gómez]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joaqu%c3%adn_G%c3%b3mez&oldid=195910024 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Joint Command of the Armed Forces of Peru]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joint_Command_of_the_Armed_Forces_of_Peru&oldid=141611344 ] | importance= | date=December 9, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Joint Interagency Task Force South]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joint_Interagency_Task_Force_South&oldid=211389107 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Joint Task Force OMEGA]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joint_Task_Force_OMEGA&oldid=176116826 ] | importance= | date=December 23, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[José Ballivián]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jos%c3%a9_Ballivi%c3%a1n&oldid=172513033 ] | importance= | date=November 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[José Toribio Merino]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jos%c3%a9_Toribio_Merino&oldid=158825894 ] | importance= | date=November 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Juan Antonio Pezet]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juan_Antonio_Pezet&oldid=154374525 ] | importance= | date=December 3, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Juan José Torres]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juan_Jos%c3%a9_Torres&oldid=170866021 ] | importance= | date=December 3, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Juan José de Sámano y Uribarri]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juan_Jos%c3%a9_de_S%c3%a1mano_y_Uribarri&oldid=182810090 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Juan Pizarro (conquistador)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juan_Pizarro_%28conquistador%29&oldid=194197019 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Juan Rius Rivera]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juan_Rius_Rivera&oldid=176917487 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Juan Williams Rebolledo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Juan_Williams_Rebolledo&oldid=209663767 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Kurt Tank]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kurt_Tank&oldid=169225737 ] | importance= | date=November 7, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[LAPA FA-03]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LAPA_FA-03&oldid=211485995 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[La Violencia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_Violencia&oldid=156352077 ] | importance= | date=September 15, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Lancero]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lancero&oldid=226129988 ] | importance= | date=July 20, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Lautaro (toqui)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lautaro_%28toqui%29&oldid=130908225 ] | importance= | date=May 14, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Lempira (Lenca ruler)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lempira_%28Lenca_ruler%29&oldid=163412248 ] | importance= | date=January 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Leopoldo Galtieri]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leopoldo_Galtieri&oldid=168304394 ] | importance= | date=November 21, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[List of Peruvian Navy ships]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Peruvian_Navy_ships&oldid=185420444 ] | importance= | date=February 6, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[List of aircraft of the Argentine Air Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_aircraft_of_the_Argentine_Air_Force&oldid=181186999 ] | importance= | date=February 6, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[List of aircraft of the Brazilian Navy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_aircraft_of_the_Brazilian_Navy&oldid=197055885 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[List of battles of the Peruvian Navy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_battles_of_the_Peruvian_Navy&oldid=185419118 ] | importance= | date=February 6, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[List of conflicts in South America]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_conflicts_in_South_America&oldid=194443147 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[List of current ships of the Chilean Navy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_current_ships_of_the_Chilean_Navy&oldid=185886141 ] | importance= | date=February 6, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[List of senior officers of the Argentine Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_senior_officers_of_the_Argentine_Army&oldid=144585658 ] | importance= | date=August 13, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[List of senior officers of the Peruvian Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_senior_officers_of_the_Peruvian_Army&oldid=201238268 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[List of ships of the Argentine Navy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_ships_of_the_Argentine_Navy&oldid=195298239 ] | importance= | date=March 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Little War (Cuba)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Little_War_%28Cuba%29&oldid=188220015 ] | importance= | date=June 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Lockheed Martin Aircraft Argentina]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lockheed_Martin_Aircraft_Argentina&oldid=180682669 ] | importance= | date=February 6, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Luis Carrera]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luis_Carrera&oldid=179268466 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Luis María Mendía]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luis_Mar%c3%ada_Mend%c3%ada&oldid=163565150 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Luisa Cáceres de Arismendi]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luisa_C%c3%a1ceres_de_Arismendi&oldid=151213207 ] | importance= | date=November 27, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Lupo class frigate]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lupo_class_frigate&oldid=177718515 ] | importance= | date=December 14, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[MEKO]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MEKO&oldid=209060624 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[MGP submachine gun]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MGP_submachine_gun&oldid=230167765 ] | importance= | date=August 8, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[MS Alfhem]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MS_Alfhem&oldid=200537184 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Machurucuto Incident]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Machurucuto_Incident&oldid=156752678 ] | importance= | date=April 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Macuahuitl]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Macuahuitl&oldid=210207053 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Manta Air Base]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manta_Air_Base&oldid=212830189 ] | importance= | date=May 21, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Manuel Ezequiel Bruzual]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manuel_Ezequiel_Bruzual&oldid=156338470 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Manuel Piar]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manuel_Piar&oldid=210050557 ] | importance= | date=May 21, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Mariano Melgarejo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mariano_Melgarejo&oldid=213471996 ] | importance= | date=May 21, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Mariano Osorio]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mariano_Osorio&oldid=178674904 ] | importance= | date=February 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Mariano Paredes]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mariano_Paredes&oldid=203184354 ] | importance= | date=May 21, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Mariscal Estigarribia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mariscal_Estigarribia&oldid=208575653 ] | importance= | date=May 28, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Marmaduque Grove]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marmaduque_Grove&oldid=164871003 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Mascarenhas de Morais]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mascarenhas_de_Morais&oldid=201718780 ] | importance= | date=June 8, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Massacre of Margarita Belén]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Massacre_of_Margarita_Bel%c3%a9n&oldid=129883167 ] | importance= | date=December 3, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Mateo de Toro Zambrano y Ureta]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mateo_de_Toro_Zambrano_y_Ureta&oldid=162878399 ] | importance= | date=November 27, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Mathogo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mathogo&oldid=179664097 ] | importance= | date=December 23, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Mexican Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mexican_Army&oldid=172681683 ] | importance= | date=November 21, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Middle Magdalena Bloc of the FARC-EP]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle_Magdalena_Bloc_of_the_FARC-EP&oldid=213542087 ] | importance= | date=May 21, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military Police (Brazil)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_Police_%28Brazil%29&oldid=231871924 ] | importance= | date=September 14, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military history of Brazil]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_history_of_Brazil&oldid=236542016 ] | importance= | date=September 14, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military of Colombia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_of_Colombia&oldid=161605698 ] | importance= | date=October 11, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military of Ecuador]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_of_Ecuador&oldid=170680897 ] | importance= | date=December 17, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military of Panama]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_of_Panama&oldid=171541381 ] | importance= | date=November 15, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military of Peru]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_of_Peru&oldid=216249123 ] | importance= | date=June 8, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military of Uruguay]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_of_Uruguay&oldid=210069415 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military of Venezuela]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_of_Venezuela&oldid=163824527 ] | importance= | date=October 11, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military ranks of Brazil]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_ranks_of_Brazil&oldid=200608317 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Military structure of the FARC-EP]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_structure_of_the_FARC-EP&oldid=197175255 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Minas Gerais class battleship]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minas_Gerais_class_battleship&oldid=189115936 ] | importance= | date=March 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[NAe São Paulo]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NAe_S%c3%a3o_Paulo&oldid=179954793 ] | importance= | date=December 26, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[NAeL Minas Gerais]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NAeL_Minas_Gerais&oldid=209128354 ] | importance= | date=May 14, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Nahuel (tank)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nahuel_%28tank%29&oldid=195100388 ] | importance= | date=September 1, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Narciso López]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Narciso_L%c3%b3pez&oldid=204547607 ] | importance= | date=April 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[National Army of Colombia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Army_of_Colombia&oldid=205212259 ] | importance= | date=May 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[National Intelligence Service of Brazil]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Intelligence_Service_of_Brazil&oldid=158083336 ] | importance= | date=September 14, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[National Navy of Uruguay]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Navy_of_Uruguay&oldid=243259482 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Niteroi class frigate]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Niteroi_class_frigate&oldid=151801591 ] | importance= | date=September 15, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Niños Héroes]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ni%c3%b1os_H%c3%a9roes&oldid=214077656 ] | importance= | date=June 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[No. 78 Squadron RAF]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=No._78_Squadron_RAF&oldid=173315152 ] | importance= | date=November 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Nueva Esparta class destroyer]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nueva_Esparta_class_destroyer&oldid=209225281 ] | importance= | date=June 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Occupation of the Araucanía]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Occupation_of_the_Araucan%c3%ada&oldid=212356999 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Operation Black Buck]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Black_Buck&oldid=160546657 ] | importance= | date=September 27, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Operation Emmanuel]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Emmanuel&oldid=215228872 ] | importance= | date=June 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Operation JM]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_JM&oldid=221330468 ] | importance= | date=June 25, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Operation Soberanía]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Soberan%c3%ada&oldid=225284476 ] | importance= | date=July 13, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Operation Sutton]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Sutton&oldid=168835953 ] | importance= | date=November 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[PR-72P class corvette]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PR-72P_class_corvette&oldid=171813588 ] | importance= | date=November 30, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Pampero MRL]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pampero_MRL&oldid=182368721 ] | importance= | date=January 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Patricio Lynch]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patricio_Lynch&oldid=194212055 ] | importance= | date=June 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Pedro Lagos]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pedro_Lagos&oldid=168209722 ] | importance= | date=November 9, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[People's Revolutionary Army (Argentina)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Revolutionary_Army_%28Argentina%29&oldid=208248156 ] | importance= | date=June 25, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Peruvian Air Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peruvian_Air_Force&oldid=220776707 ] | importance= | date=June 25, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Peruvian Navy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peruvian_Navy&oldid=221533092 ] | importance= | date=June 25, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Platoon]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Platoon&oldid=241382122 ] | importance= | date=September 29, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Plus Ultra Brigade]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plus_Ultra_Brigade&oldid=144462172 ] | importance= | date=August 19, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Policarpa Salavarrieta]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Policarpa_Salavarrieta&oldid=167019494 ] | importance= | date=April 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Popular Liberation Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Popular_Liberation_Army&oldid=163896092 ] | importance= | date=December 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Project FUBELT]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Project_FUBELT&oldid=161402347 ] | importance= | date=October 31, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Puerto Belgrano]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Puerto_Belgrano&oldid=207600197 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Pursuit of Nazi collaborators]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pursuit_of_Nazi_collaborators&oldid=223518076 ] | importance= | date=July 13, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Pío de Tristán]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=P%c3%ado_de_Trist%c3%a1n&oldid=182803515 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Rafael Maroto]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rafael_Maroto&oldid=148621790 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Ramón Castilla]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ram%c3%b3n_Castilla&oldid=162704848 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Ramón Freire]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ram%c3%b3n_Freire&oldid=156321935 ] | importance= | date=September 7, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Red Shirts (Mexico)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Red_Shirts_%28Mexico%29&oldid=172779562 ] | importance= | date=December 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Republic of South Peru]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Republic_of_South_Peru&oldid=210982681 ] | importance= | date=September 14, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Revolutionary_Armed_Forces_of_Colombia&oldid=179115497 ] | importance= | date=September 24, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Robert Winthrop Simpson]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robert_Winthrop_Simpson&oldid=139886181 ] | importance= | date=August 16, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Rodolfo Stange]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rodolfo_Stange&oldid=219010949 ] | importance= | date=June 29, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Schooner Virjen de Covadonga]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Schooner_Virjen_de_Covadonga&oldid=162354469 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Servicio de Inteligencia del Ejército (Argentina)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Servicio_de_Inteligencia_del_Ej%c3%a9rcito_%28Argentina%29&oldid=133547140 ] | importance= | date=June 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Simón Bolívar]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sim%c3%b3n_Bol%c3%advar&oldid=243215592 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_conquest_of_the_Aztec_Empire&oldid=237851109 ] | importance= | date=September 14, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spanish_conquest_of_the_Inca_Empire&oldid=161442501 ] | importance= | date=October 3, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Sukhoi Su-30MKK]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sukhoi_Su-30MKK&oldid=226701760 ] | importance= | date=July 23, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[TR-1700 class submarine]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TR-1700_class_submarine&oldid=242342882 ] | importance= | date=October 2, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Tacuara Nationalist Movement]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tacuara_Nationalist_Movement&oldid=187397332 ] | importance= | date=February 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Tampico Expedition]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tampico_Expedition&oldid=229243394 ] | importance= | date=August 3, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[The Falklands Play]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Falklands_Play&oldid=178168290 ] | importance= | date=February 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Thousand Days War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thousand_Days_War&oldid=149849612 ] | importance= | date=March 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Tiuna]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tiuna&oldid=225858091 ] | importance= | date=July 30, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Trinidad and Tobago Regiment]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trinidad_and_Tobago_Regiment&oldid=202166588 ] | importance= | date=June 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Type 22 frigate]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_22_frigate&oldid=219276824 ] | importance= | date=June 25, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Type 23 frigate]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_23_frigate&oldid=219276864 ] | importance= | date=June 25, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Type 42 destroyer]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Type_42_destroyer&oldid=195167860 ] | importance= | date=March 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Túpac Amaru II]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T%c3%bapac_Amaru_II&oldid=159695962 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Alamo (LSD-33)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Alamo_%28LSD-33%29&oldid=180443820 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Beatty (DD-756)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Beatty_%28DD-756%29&oldid=207175170 ] | importance= | date=June 15, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Benham (DD-796)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Benham_%28DD-796%29&oldid=182944669 ] | importance= | date=June 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Boise (CL-47)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Boise_%28CL-47%29&oldid=195282754 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Borie (DD-704)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Borie_%28DD-704%29&oldid=213877150 ] | importance= | date=June 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Bradley (FF-1041)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Bradley_%28FF-1041%29&oldid=170295403 ] | importance= | date=November 12, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Braine (DD-630)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Braine_%28DD-630%29&oldid=174576843 ] | importance= | date=June 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Brooklyn (CL-40)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Brooklyn_%28CL-40%29&oldid=159565437 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Charles J. Badger (DD-657)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Charles_J._Badger_%28DD-657%29&oldid=81759303 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Charles S. Sperry (DD-697)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Charles_S._Sperry_%28DD-697%29&oldid=150574213 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Chase County (LST-532)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Chase_County_%28LST-532%29&oldid=130148625 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Execute (AM-232)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Execute_%28AM-232%29&oldid=217529210 ] | importance= | date=July 16, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Facility (AM-233)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Facility_%28AM-233%29&oldid=217529375 ] | importance= | date=July 16, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Falcon (1846)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Falcon_%281846%29&oldid=193401359 ] | importance= | date=July 16, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Frederick (LST-1184)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Frederick_%28LST-1184%29&oldid=163172870 ] | importance= | date=November 7, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Gunston Hall (LSD-5)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Gunston_Hall_%28LSD-5%29&oldid=169900981 ] | importance= | date=November 9, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Hale (DD-642)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Hale_%28DD-642%29&oldid=152611295 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Hartley (DE-1029)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Hartley_%28DE-1029%29&oldid=171579640 ] | importance= | date=November 27, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Hermitage (LSD-34)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Hermitage_%28LSD-34%29&oldid=192450242 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Holder (DD-819)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Holder_%28DD-819%29&oldid=116335110 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Isherwood (DD-520)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Isherwood_%28DD-520%29&oldid=177811254 ] | importance= | date=September 24, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS LST-1108]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_LST-1108&oldid=190622353 ] | importance= | date=March 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS LST-995]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_LST-995&oldid=190619719 ] | importance= | date=March 4, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Lowry (DD-770)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Lowry_%28DD-770%29&oldid=174628630 ] | importance= | date=December 14, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Marietta (AN-82)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Marietta_%28AN-82%29&oldid=226642548 ] | importance= | date=July 23, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Nashville (CL-43)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Nashville_%28CL-43%29&oldid=144344964 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Philadelphia (CL-41)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Philadelphia_%28CL-41%29&oldid=196966965 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Spot (SS-413)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Spot_%28SS-413%29&oldid=152594617 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS St. Louis (CL-49)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_St._Louis_%28CL-49%29&oldid=181729150 ] | importance= | date=January 21, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Strong (DD-758)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Strong_%28DD-758%29&oldid=194907000 ] | importance= | date=May 21, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[USS Wadleigh (DD-689)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Wadleigh_%28DD-689%29&oldid=107802712 ] | importance= | date=October 6, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[United Provinces of South America]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Provinces_of_South_America&oldid=219926290 ] | importance= | date=July 13, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Uruguayan Air Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uruguayan_Air_Force&oldid=216323336 ] | importance= | date=June 18, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Uruguayan Civil War]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uruguayan_Civil_War&oldid=229869837 ] | importance= | date=September 1, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Venezuelan Air Force]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Venezuelan_Air_Force&oldid=216842940 ] | importance= | date=June 11, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Vicente Castaño]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Casta%c3%b1o&oldid=161467551 ] | importance= | date=October 24, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Vicente Guerrero]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicente_Guerrero&oldid=145137839 ] | importance= | date=July 25, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Vickers Type 143]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vickers_Type_143&oldid=167285913 ] | importance= | date=November 15, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[War of the Supremes]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=War_of_the_Supremes&oldid=144028611 ] | importance= | date=August 31, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Wars involving Colombia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wars_involving_Colombia&oldid=173944999 ] | importance= | date=January 22, 2008 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[William Walker (soldier)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_Walker_%28soldier%29&oldid=142387490 ] | importance= | date=July 4, 2007 | class={{Start-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1st Division (Colombia)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1st_Division_%28Colombia%29&oldid=172521588 ] | importance= | date=December 17, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1st Venezuelan Rifles]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1st_Venezuelan_Rifles&oldid=168069575 ] | importance= | date=October 31, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[1º Batalhão de Forcas Especiais]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1%c2%ba_Batalh%c3%a3o_de_Forcas_Especiais&oldid=165493881 ] | importance= | date=November 18, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[2nd Division of the Colombian National Army]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2nd_Division_of_the_Colombian_National_Army&oldid=172401744 ] | importance= | date=December 17, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[5th Mechanized Infantry Battalion (Colombia)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=5th_Mechanized_Infantry_Battalion_%28Colombia%29&oldid=172312170 ] | importance= | date=November 27, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[601 Assault Helicopter Battalion]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=601_Assault_Helicopter_Battalion&oldid=224978486 ] | importance= | date=July 13, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[601 Commando Company]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=601_Commando_Company&oldid=224994840 ] | importance= | date=August 21, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[602 Commando Company]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=602_Commando_Company&oldid=174011132 ] | importance= | date=December 3, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[6th Mountain Infantry Brigade (Argentina)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=6th_Mountain_Infantry_Brigade_%28Argentina%29&oldid=162882737 ] | importance= | date=December 26, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[7th Infantry Regiment (Argentina)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=7th_Infantry_Regiment_%28Argentina%29&oldid=150627521 ] | importance= | date=August 13, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[8th Mountain Infantry Brigade (Argentina)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=8th_Mountain_Infantry_Brigade_%28Argentina%29&oldid=162882824 ] | importance= | date=October 11, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Almirante Brown (C-1)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Almirante_Brown_%28C-1%29&oldid=164132811 ] | importance= | date=October 14, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Almirante Brown (D-10)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Almirante_Brown_%28D-10%29&oldid=192832212 ] | importance= | date=February 24, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Almirante Domecq Garcia (D23)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Almirante_Domecq_Garcia_%28D23%29&oldid=89489827 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Bahía Buen Suceso]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Bah%C3%ADa_Buen_Suceso&oldid=100560253 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Cabo San Antonio (Q42)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Cabo_San_Antonio_%28Q42%29&oldid=146291348 ] | importance= | date=October 3, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Ciudad de Zárate (Q-61)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Ciudad_de_Z%c3%a1rate_%28Q-61%29&oldid=226673908 ] | importance= | date=July 20, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Espora (P-41)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Espora_%28P-41%29&oldid=162654639 ] | importance= | date=February 24, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Gómez Roca (P-46)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_G%c3%b3mez_Roca_%28P-46%29&oldid=162655491 ] | importance= | date=February 24, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Heroína (D-12)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Hero%C3%ADna_%28D-12%29&oldid=120249292 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Hércules]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_H%c3%a9rcules&oldid=166224633 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Isla de los Estados]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Isla_de_los_Estados&oldid=147355949 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA La Argentina (D-11)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_La_Argentina_%28D-11%29&oldid=192832425 ] | importance= | date=February 24, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Murature (P-20)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Murature_%28P-20%29&oldid=227371647 ] | importance= | date=July 27, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Nueve de Julio]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Nueve_de_Julio&oldid=176545797 ] | importance= | date=March 11, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Parker (P-44)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Parker_%28P-44%29&oldid=162655725 ] | importance= | date=February 24, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Patagonia (B-1)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Patagonia_%28B-1%29&oldid=118511068 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Robinson (P-45)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Robinson_%28P-45%29&oldid=162655002 ] | importance= | date=March 4, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Rosales (P-42)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Rosales_%28P-42%29&oldid=162656359 ] | importance= | date=February 24, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA San Luis]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_San_Luis&oldid=116308432 ] | importance= | date=April 12, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Santísima Trinidad (1974)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Sant%c3%adsima_Trinidad_%281974%29&oldid=172741414 ] | importance= | date=March 4, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Sarandí (D-13)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Sarand%c3%ad_%28D-13%29&oldid=192832540 ] | importance= | date=February 24, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Spiro (P-43)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Spiro_%28P-43%29&oldid=167856002 ] | importance= | date=February 24, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARA Veinticinco de Mayo (cruiser)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARA_Veinticinco_de_Mayo_%28cruiser%29&oldid=166225686 ] | importance= | date=November 27, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[ARC (Callsign)]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ARC_%28Callsign%29&oldid=108477552 ] | importance= | date=November 24, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Acre class destroyer]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acre_class_destroyer&oldid=174802611 ] | importance= | date=December 3, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Action of 14 May 1814]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Action_of_14_May_1814&oldid=217662931 ] | importance= | date=June 22, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Aerotec]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aerotec&oldid=175793173 ] | importance= | date=February 4, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Agrupación de Comandos Especiales Aéreos]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Agrupaci%c3%b3n_de_Comandos_Especiales_A%c3%a9reos&oldid=122464359 ] | importance= | date=September 15, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Air Surveillance Service]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Air_Surveillance_Service&oldid=203363972 ] | importance= | date=May 5, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Albano Harguindeguy]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Albano_Harguindeguy&oldid=147592790 ] | importance= | date=November 24, 2007 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment | page=[[Alfredo Oscar Saint Jean]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alfredo_Oscar_Saint_Jean&oldid=208562020 ] | importance= | date=June 4, 2008 | class={{Stub-Class}} | version= | comments= }} |
|||
{{assessment footer|seealso=See also: [[:Category:South American military history articles by quality|assessed article categories]]. |lastdate=}} |
|||
<noinclude> |
|||
I think we need a tag for poor capitalization. This is a major problem in many articles about Japanese (and perhaps other countries') popular culture where names have unconventional capitalization. The problem arises because contributors think that the 'official' capitalization of an album/band/single name etc. should run through the whole document in opposition to Wikipedia's guidelines on style. It's particular annoying to read whole articles filled with all-caps etc. I think in this case it makes more sense just to target the capitalization rather than the punctuation/style in general because that is usually the major problem and I can see a more general approach resulting in a comma or two being fixed and the message being deleted. |
|||
{{process header |
|||
| title = ↑[[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/South American military history articles by quality|(up)]] |
|||
[[L'Arc~en~Ciel]] is a good example. |
|||
| section = |
|||
| previous = ← (prev) |
|||
[[User:Macgruder|Macgruder]] 17:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
| next = [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/South American military history articles by quality/2|(next)]] → |
|||
| shortcut = |
|||
:I think you can feel free to be [[WP:bold|bold]] and create one, perhaps also specific to the particular kinds of (Japanese-related?) capitalization problems you are encountering. -- [[User:LeaW|Lea]] ([[User talk:LeaW|talk]]) 04:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
| notes = |
|||
}}</noinclude> |
|||
A capitalization tag exists, as seen below |
|||
{{capitalization}} --[[User:Ipatrol|Ipatrol]] ([[User talk:Ipatrol|talk]]) 23:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Proposed template: technical jargon == |
|||
I'd like to see a simple template to use when an author has used a technical term without defining it. See [[Romic alphabet]] and its use of the term "glossic transcription". <nowiki>{{buzzword}}</nowiki> implies that the article is loaded with lots of buzzwords, which may not always be the case. We need something for the isolated term. |
|||
Suggested format: <nowiki>{{Techterm|term}}</nowiki> |
|||
Suggested text, using a purple box and the 40pxInformation icon: |
|||
: This article uses the technical term "term" without defining it. Please rewrite this article to make it more accessible to a general audience and comply with Wikipedia's quality standards. See [[Wikipedia:Explain_jargon]]. |
|||
--[[User:Cbdorsett|Cbdorsett]] 09:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:All that over a little bit of text seems a bit specialized and unnecessary. How often does that happen, anyway? [[User:Ace Class Shadow|Ace Class Shadow]]; [[User talk:Ace Class Shadow|My talk]]. 22:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I endorse this proposal. This sort of problem occurs frequently in technical articles (such as those concerning sound editing and production). It's extremely hard to read, much less edit, an article when you don't know what it's saying and therefore don't know what it <i>should</i> say. |
|||
:One of the fundamental tenets of a good dictionary is that every word used within the dictionary is also defined within the dictionary. While Wikipedia is obviously <i>not</i> a dictionary, it does purport to be an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia is by definition a generalist reference work, targeted to a generalist audience. Terms that are not otherwise accessible should be defined either within the body of the article or with a link to a relevant article. I'm definitely not in favor of "dumbing down" the Wikipedia, but it's pointless to include a technical article targeted to a technical audience if it's not understandable to the public at large. -- [[User:Nonstopdrivel|Nonstopdrivel]] 21:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
In respose I have created and posted the following: |
|||
{{Cleanup-jargon|date=September 2008}} --[[User:Ipatrol|Ipatrol]] ([[User talk:Ipatrol|talk]]) 23:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Lead == |
|||
Is there a template to suggest that a page should revise its introduction or add one in accordance with [[WP:LEAD]]. Please respond to my talk page. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] 16:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Using the talkpage of the article is an option instead of using templates. --[[User:Van helsing|Van helsing]] 20:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Well, obviously, Van. The templates themselves often advise or require talk page comments. Still, your commentr is a general denouncement, not an answer. I'd say there probably aren't any templates like that. I've never seen one. [[User:Ace Class Shadow|Ace Class Shadow]]; [[User talk:Ace Class Shadow|My talk]]. 20:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::You’re right there Ace. But, in general I think we should avoid creating templates for every little issue and litter an article with it. People tend to avoid talking about their concerns when there’s a convenient template available, even when a template refers to the talkpage. Still, I agree it probably wasn’t the response TonyTheTiger was looking for. --[[User:Van helsing|Van helsing]] 22:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::I would posit that tags unsupported by discussion in the Talk page should be summarily dismissed. There's too much temptation for vandalism. --[[User:Nonstopdrivel|Nonstopdrivel]] 21:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
As I replied at his talkpage, See the first 4 template links in [[:Category:Wikipedia introduction cleanup]]. I've added them to the list already. --[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] 21:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Still, none of that actually applies to ''creating'' an intro. [[User:Ace Class Shadow|Ace Class Shadow]]; [[User talk:Ace Class Shadow|My talk]]. 21:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Overhaul == |
|||
I've [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ATemplate_messages%2FCleanup&diff=103797448&oldid=103279699 just finished re-structuring] this page, so that the various cleanup templates are divided into sections based on their purpose/topic/etc. That will hopefully make it much easier to find the specific template one is looking for. I've also added some intro text (with links) to many of the sections, in an attempt to provide some context for the new user. Can we remove the {{tl|cleanup-restructure}} template from this project page now? Comments, commendations, and condemnations are all welcome. —[[User:DragonHawk|DragonHawk]] <small>([[User talk:DragonHawk|talk]])</small> 08:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Looks great, much thanks :) --[[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] 09:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Seeing no disagreement, and as the page appears to be in good shape, I'm going to remove the {{tl|cleanup-restructure}} template. [[User:NickdelaG|NickdelaG]] |
|||
== List == |
|||
I created this list iof templates and their category for a [[WP:LGBT]] automated to-do list, but thought other people may wish to use it: |
|||
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> |
|||
;Cleanup |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-remainder}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-confusing}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-list}} |
|||
:{{tl|create-list}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-disambig}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-afd}} |
|||
:{{tl|abbreviations}} |
|||
:{{tl|buzzword}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-combine}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-laundry}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-laundryrack}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-rewrite}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-spam}} |
|||
:{{tl|in-universe}} |
|||
:{{tl|contradict}} |
|||
:{{tl|Essay-entry}} |
|||
:{{tl|fiction}} |
|||
:{{tl|Prose}} |
|||
:{{tl|External links}} |
|||
:{{tl|toomuchtrivia}} |
|||
:{{tl|uncategorized}} |
|||
:{{tl|spelling}} |
|||
;Expert Attention |
|||
:{{tl|Expert}} |
|||
:{{tl|Expert-verify}} |
|||
:{{tl|in-universe}} |
|||
;Wikification |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-restructure}} |
|||
:{{tl|proseline}} |
|||
:{{tl|in-universe}} |
|||
:{{tl|wikify}} |
|||
;NPOV |
|||
:{{tl|advert}} |
|||
:{{tl|review}} |
|||
:{{tl|fansite}} |
|||
:{{tl|review}} |
|||
:{{tl|POV}} |
|||
:{{tl|POV-section}} |
|||
:{{tl|totally-disputed}} |
|||
:{{tl|totally-disputed-section}} |
|||
:{{tl|sections}} |
|||
:{{tl|globalize}} |
|||
:{{tl|story}} |
|||
:{{tl|weasel}} |
|||
;Verification |
|||
:{{tl|copypaste}} |
|||
:{{tl|Disputed}} |
|||
:{{tl|Disputed-section}} |
|||
:{{tl|citations missing}} |
|||
:{{tl|citecheck}} |
|||
:{{tl|unreferenced}} |
|||
:{{tl|Unreferencedsect}} |
|||
:{{tl|originalresearch}} |
|||
;Expand |
|||
:{{tl|context}} |
|||
:{{tl|Expand}} |
|||
:{{tl|Expand-section}} |
|||
:{{tl|local}} |
|||
:{{tl|Expand}} |
|||
;Translation |
|||
:{{tl|Notenglish}} |
|||
:{{tl|TranslatePassage}} |
|||
:{{tl|cleanup-translation}} |
|||
:{{tl|RoughTranslation}} |
|||
</div> |
|||
[[User:Dev920|Dev920]] (Have a nice day!) 15:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Template proposal: Math == |
|||
What about a template noting that there are mathematic formulas or calculations that need to be formatted properly? --[[User:LakeHMM|LakeHMM]] 05:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Here's an awnser to your prayers: |
|||
{{Mathematics}} |
|||
--[[User:Ipatrol|Ipatrol]] ([[User talk:Ipatrol|talk]]) 23:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Cleanup of the templates == |
|||
What's with the total lack of standardisation?! The variety of images, colours and wording across the templates is very confusing, which is especially bad since these are supposed to be placed in the article namespace. Can we suggest a few standards? <font face="Verdana">'''[[User:Jrockley|Jack]]''' <small>· [[User talk:Jrockley|talk]] · 14:07, Sunday, 25 February 2007</small></font> |
|||
==Template proposal: Redundancy== |
|||
There really should be a template message for articles where a lot of the text is repetitive or redundant. An example of this problem is the current article on [[Goliathus]] (Goliath beetle) where virtually the same litany of facts is stated in the first part of the article and repeated in a different order in the second part. I have no experience making templates (does it require administrative approval?), but if it is possible I would be glad to design such a template myself. [[User:InnocuousPseudonym|InnocuousPseudonym]] 04:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Here's what you have been asking for: |
|||
{{Repetition|date=September 2008}}--[[User:Ipatrol|Ipatrol]] ([[User talk:Ipatrol|talk]]) 00:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Template for obscure time references? == |
|||
Is there a template for relative time references such as "yesterday", "last year", "X years ago," "recently," etc. that seem as if "today" was the current date used as a reference? '''''<font color="007575">[[User:Squids and Chips|Squids]]</font>'and'<font color="FF7700">[[User talk:Squids and Chips|Chips]]</font>''''' 00:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Template proposal == |
|||
I would like to propose the following template: |
|||
<div class="messagebox disputed metadata"> |
|||
{|style="width:100%;background:none" |
|||
|width=60px align=center|[[Image:Circle-question-blue.svg|33px]] |
|||
|An editor is concerned that the facts stated in this {{#ifeq:{{{1|}}}|section|section|article}} may be '''misleading'''. Please see the discussion on the [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]]. |
|||
|}</div> |
|||
This idea came out of a discussion about ''[[Proprioception]]'' on that articles talk page. I think that it would be a useful alternative to {{tl|Disputed}}, where the facts aren't '''wrong''' ''per se'', but the theme of the article seems to miss the point. Also, it could be useful when the wording of an article is such that the statements in the article may be true, but they might lead the casual reader to interpret them in a way that is not. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 18:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Hearing no objection, I'm going to go ahead and add this one. --'''[[User:Selket|Selket]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Selket|Talk]]</sup> 17:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Cleanup of specific subjects == |
|||
Are these really necessary? Would it be impossible to use the more generic cleanup templates instead of these? {{unsigned|128.146.115.227}} |
|||
: How is this supposed to work? The cleanup-section template (for example) prints "and/or replace this tag with a [[Cleanup#Cleanup_.E2.80.94_specific_issues|more specific message]]", but the link to Cleanup#Cleanup_.E2.80.94_specific_issues doesn't go anywhere. Does "more specific message" mean using a more specific tag (cleanup-section instead of cleanup), or is there a parameter like date that lets an editor say specifically how the page / section / whatever needs to be cleaned up? (Obviously this can go in the talk page.) [[User:Lumpish Scholar|Lumpish Scholar]] 13:09, 18 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::It seems the problem lies in the redirect page. Checking the history it used to redirect to [[Wikipedia:Cleanup]] but was changed to [[cleanliness]] and back and forth to [[Wikipedia:Cleanup resources]]. Currently it points to [[cleanliness]] which as you said is pretty useless. The templates probably need to be changed to point directly to [[Wikipedia:Cleanup resources]] instead. I think the general idea of the message itself is to get people to mark what kinds of cleanup need to be done (wikify, rewrite, whatever) rather than the general tag. Hope that answers your question, maybe someone more familiar with the templates in question will fix them, or we could just change the redirect, again. [[User:Stardust8212|Stardust8212]] 13:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Minor glitch == |
|||
The "citations missing" template shows up on most pages as this: |
|||
'''"This article or section is missing citations and/or footnotes."''' (and so on) |
|||
However, [[Cleanup#Verifiability_and_sources|here]] on ''this'' page, it shows up as this: |
|||
'''"''This'' is missing citations and/or footnotes."''' (etc.) |
|||
Any clues why? Maybe it's linked to an older version, somehow... I checked the Wiki code there and can't think of anything else. [[User:Kennard2|Kennard2]] 01:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== "list templates" category == |
|||
This article is appropriate for categorization in [[:category:list templates]] because this article has list ''cleanup'' templates. [[Duh]]. There should be a way to have a master (template?) list cleanup template list that ''only'' has those templates on it, so the entire [[wikipedia:template messages/cleanup]] article doesn't have to be included in the "list templates' category. -[[User:Eep²|Eep²]] 10:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
: No it isn't, because the category itself says it isn't allowed, as I quoted to you. If you want to change that, first edit the category to remove that text. Otherwise we are contradicting ourselves. As for the other issue, this page should probably be split up anyway.—[[User:Greenrd|greenrd]] 11:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== subpages == |
|||
These template message lists are getting too long. They should be split up into even more subpages. See [[Wikipedia_talk:Template_messages#subpages]] for main discussion -[[User:Eep²|Eep²]] 16:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Proposed policy: Keep cleanup tags on talk pages == |
|||
I'm proposing a policy [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28policy%29#Policy_on_the_use_of_.22cleanup.22_and_other_templates_in_articles] saying that "cleanup" messages should be on talk pages, not in the article itself. Your thoughts are welcome. --[[User:PeR|PeR]] 07:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC |
|||
:What can I do to lend support for your proposal? An even better approach, in my view, would be to include a special section at the bottom of *every* page for cleanup metadata. The current templates would be keywords here. This could even be done through the Categories system perhaps, but would probably best be a new system. But in the meantime I can certainly support the present proposal. [[User:Beefman|beefman]] ([[User talk:Beefman|talk]]) 17:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I think they should be left on the page itself. First off it lets the reader now that there are issues with the article. Secondly, it means that the shortcomings of the article are more likely to be dealt with as the main contributers know that the 'weaknesses' of the article are in a very visible place. Put that stuff on the talk page and people are less likely to deal with it in my opinion. [[User:Macgruder|Macgruder]] 09:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Just for information, there's currently a backlog of over 24 000 pages marked for "cleanup". I don't think it's possible for people to be any less likely to deal with it. --[[User:PeR|PeR]] 05:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::: 24,000 out of 1,775,000 . About 1.35%. That seems a good number. [[User:Macgruder|Macgruder]] 08:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::: This was discussed recently on [[WP:VP]], but I didn't see the end result. Did anyone else see it? They archive and move that stuff too quickly. [[User:Timneu22|Timneu22]] 15:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
=== Revisiting: Where should cleanup tags be placed? === |
|||
I have been influenced by an [[User:Shanes/Why tags are evil|essay]] I read about eight or nine months ago, and would like anyone responding to my comments here to [[User:Shanes/Why tags are evil|read it]] before responding to me. I believe, as does the writer (who makes his case better than I can) of this essay, that those of us who edit Wikipedia are so wrapped up in our role as editors that we sometimes forget about the fact that most people who visit our pages are ''readers'', not editors. They come here to be informed, and they are, by and large, not interested in our editing policies and practices. But we are so vain that we continue to plant tags and templates on the top of articles that are of no use to our readers, and may actually distract them—or worse, turn them off—from reading Wikipedia. Now some tags may be unavoidably necessary. A warning, if it is genuine, on severe POV problems may be necessary to warn a reader before he begins reading. But a semi-protection warning is irrelevant to the reader of our articles. That's why someone got smart and created the little padlock icon to use instead. It was a recognition that the SP tag was not something that readers needed to see. Along the same lines, one editor, [[User:Notmyhandle]], made a small [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Notmyhandle/Sandbox cleanup icon], which I think is a great idea. But as much as I like it, I suspect most people who hang out on this page will say that we need something bigger. |
|||
So what I'm asking for, is that we consider whether or not cleanup templates at the top really serve the interest of our readers. I do not think so. I think the argument that it is more likely that they will get cleaned up is disproved by the geometric growth of such templates. We have gone tag-template crazy, and some decent articles will still have three large tags at the top, "warning" readers who would be nuts to continue reading past these signs. Okay, okay, maybe they ''are'' needed (though the cleanup tags are, in my opinion, overused). But why can't we put them on the talk page, or maybe at the ''bottom'' of the article? In this way, editors who cruise the cleanup pages will still be able to easily identify them, but readers will not have to endure them. I think to do otherwise is to place our own Wiki-world above the real-world needs of readers. |
|||
I think that this is worth discussing. I don't believe (as I did a few months ago) that there should be one rule for every tag and every situation. But I think, at the very least, that an editor ought to be able to know that our policy will at least allow him or her to use his or her judgement to place such tags at the bottom of the article, if they think that the reader will not suffer for it. I've already seen that many editors are doing this (perhaps influenced by the above-mentioned essay, though that speculation is groundless). Can't we at least make the tag location optional? [[User:Unschool|Unschool]] 03:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I absolutely agree. In fact I have deeper philosophical objections to cleanup tags as they exist today than just their scornful visual appearance. Editors of this encyclopedia fall into two groups: those who you call simply "editors", and those infrequent or even anonymous editors who chip in with little bits of information here and there. According to at least one independent study of wikipedia edits, this latter group contributes tremendous value to the project. It's information aggregation at its finest. But the in-crowding of "editors", and the arcane practices that result, discourage this latter group to an extent that is hard to overstate. If the cool kids continue to turn editorship into a clique, it will destroy wikipedia. In fact, edits are down sharply this year, and the feeling in the air is most ominous indeed. There's simply no time to waste. [[User:Beefman|beefman]] ([[User talk:Beefman|talk]]) 17:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I believe the tags can serve a useful purpose but I feel they are far to prominent at present. Moving them to the discussion page is probably too drastic but I think they should be moved to the bottom of the article and minimised by default to one line or less with a button to expand it if the reader is interested. Only serious warnings to the readers should be at the top. Serious means warnings about bias, not notes that the article doesn't follow our house style. [[User:Filceolaire|Filceolaire]] 21:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Yes, I too think that the "article message boxes" are far to visible and disturbing. I would prefer that most of them go on the talk page. But since I bet that will never happen I like what Filceolaire suggested, putting them on the bottom of the page just like the stub notices. And making them thinner (just one row of text) or have a hide/show button on them. And with a link to further explanation. The hide/show button technology is already readily available and currently used in [[Template:navbox|navboxes]]. Those buttons have the nifty feature that if only one box is there it shows, but if there are several they collapse. I know how to code/use that stuff so if you are interested I can code up a demo. |
|||
::--[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 13:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::I agree that they should go on the talk page, or even at the bottom of an article rather than just below the title. If people want to edit articles on Wikipedia then it should be established that the Talk pages should be visited to see what changes are requested. I did a simple Google search for a word (whos article in wikipedia i knew had a cleanup tag) and the preview of the article that Google provides was not the article but was the text from the tag! this is defintely discouraging for any users who consider wikipedia as knowledge source. I know I was quite disturbed to see that! [[User:Wiki Roxor|Wiki Roxor]] ([[User talk:Wiki Roxor|talk]]) 18:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Req Photo Tag== |
|||
I'd like to know what to do about the req photo tag. I've delt with admins on this. On the tags talk page itself the issue is there but unsettled. I have had admins agree with me and others not. I have some removing the tags with it and without it (? those really confuse me) on the articles talk page. I do not see a policy/rule anywhere saying the request photo tag can be on the article page or one saying only for the talk page. I like what Macgruder said above for reasons why it should be on the article page. Nothing to get in a huff over but to make edits on Friday and come back on monday and find all your dozen or so req photo tags deleted for no stated reason is really annoying (all by the same admin no reason listed.)--[[User:Xiahou|Xiahou]] 22:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== orphaned category == |
|||
I created an [[template:orphancat|orphaned category template]]. -[[User:Eep²|Eep²]] 22:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== cleanup of cleanup templates == |
|||
This article is particularly badly sectioned. The "Plain old editing" and "General cleanup" sections could be merged. The "Lists" section conflicts with [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Lists]]; the way the templates are sorted now isn't consistent since there are list templates in this article as well as a separate page ''just'' for lists (which doesn't include list cleanup templates)--it's just badly organized. There are a few different ways to sort all of these template messages: page type (article, category), namespace type (user, article, category, template, image, etc), page element (intro, main article, specific section, lists, external links, etc), and then kind of the way it is now but with better sorting--it's like in [[The Sims]] where objects can be sorted by room (kitchen, bedroom, bathroom, etc) or type (appliances, electronics, etc); location (form) vs. function. Wiki templates should be sorted similiarly, with the same template on different lists, relative to the location/function, I believe. ∞[[User:Eep²|'''Σɛ<sub>Þ</sub>²''']] <sup>([[User_talk:Eep²|τ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eep²|c]])</sup> 07:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I disagree.... I found the sections, as accessed from the TOC, to be pretty intuitive and clear. YMMV. [[User:Davidbspalding|David Spalding]] (<big><font color="darkred">[[User talk:Davidbspalding|☎]] [[Special:Emailuser/Davidbspalding|✉]] [[Special:contributions/davidbspalding|✍]]</font></big>) 16:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Yea, well, I don't. Not everyone thinks/classifies the same way, and I'm just trying to appease multiple classification schemes. ∞[[User:Eep²|'''Σɛ<sub>Þ</sub>²''']] <sup>([[User_talk:Eep²|τ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Eep²|c]])</sup> 14:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== "All-purpose" cleanup template proposal == |
|||
I don't know if this idea has been discussed before, but it seems to me that the number of cleanup templates is growing to a point where it diminishes their usefulness. |
|||
For instance, consider a long, but very poorly-written article. |
|||
* An editor could just add {{tl|cleanup}}, or a similar template, but it says right there to try and be as specific as possible. |
|||
* It needs grammar and spelling help, but the style, cohesion and tone are OK - thus, {{tl|grammar}} and {{tl|spelling}} are added, not {{tl|copyedit}}. |
|||
* An unstructured timeline is also present in the article - {{tl|proseline}} gets added, too. |
|||
* None of this mess is referenced, so {{tl|unreferenced}} finds a home as well. |
|||
* Etc, etc, etc, until the number or variety of applicable templates is so great that nothing is actually done. |
|||
Many of you may say, "not many articles are actually like this", but I just finished editing one; it was three pages long and included a lot of good, but poorly-presented, information. I could have added five or six cleanup templates to the thing. We need a way to display exactly what's wrong with the article, without displaying any unneeded criticism. |
|||
Therefore, I'm looking for input on the idea and help constructing an "all-purpose" cleanup template. I'm thinking the description page could look a lot like [[Wikipedia:Template messages]], but without the template images. This template would include dozens of optional parameters, each corresponding to one particular problem that is right now represented by a whole template. The editor adding this "all-purpose" template to an article would simply choose the applicable parameters, just like s/he would choose templates right now - the difference is that the problems would be displayed '''in one template''' rather than cluttering the page with multiple images. |
|||
Thus, the aforementioned article might receive template code as follows: <tt><nowiki>{{allpurposecleanup|grammar=yes|spelling=yes|proseline=yes|unreferenced = {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}}}</nowiki></tt> |
|||
Then '''one template image''' would be displayed on the article, reading something like, "Multiple problems have been identified in this article." This would be followed by a bulleted (or otherwise) list determined by the parameters provided, e.g.: |
|||
* This article needs a spellcheck |
|||
* The grammar of this article should be corrected |
|||
* An unstructured timeline is present in this article |
|||
* This article does not cite any sources or references. |
|||
In summary: This template would relieve cleanup-template crowding by '''concentrating all cleanup messages''' into one concise and easily-navigable template. It would also clarify all template messages by '''including all messages that are needed, and none that aren't'''. |
|||
Whatcha think? [[User:PaladinWhite|PaladinWhite]] 00:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I think this is potentially a good idea - multiple templates tend to clutter the article page, and this would certainly resolve that. I can't think of any major problems from a theoretical standpoint (although perhaps there are some WYSIWYG concerns with regard to use of the templates and their effect on editing the article) - are there any technical concerns that might need to be resolved? [[User:Carom|Carom]] 05:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I think this is a brilliant idea. The very core idea of template is to avoid repeating the same thing. Yet, this template explosion is exactly that. [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup]] illustrates the problem and is a good starting point. There are a few implementation detail questions I'd like to raise |
|||
::* In icon at all? Editor-overridable icon? One or many? |
|||
::* What will be the fate of the existing templates? Deletion? Transcluding the all-purpose template? |
|||
::* What about the templates on Wikipedias of other languages? Notify the ambassadors? |
|||
::* Shorter name than "allpurposecleanup"? |
|||
::--[[User:Chochopk|ChoChoPK]] (球球PK) ([[User talk:Chochopk|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Chochopk|contrib]]) 01:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::I think this is a great idea. We use a similar multi-purpose template for {{tl|WPAVIATION}} with a large number of parameters and multiple features, which eliminated the large number of sub-project templates. [[User:Dhaluza|Dhaluza]] 02:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::Let's do it. |
|||
::::* One icon would be best, I'd say. Otherwise, let the icon be determined by the type of clean up as specified by the parameters. |
|||
::::* Specific templates can be depreciated and, if they fall out of use, deleted. |
|||
::::* Why not the name {{tlf|cleanup}}? Default to its current form. |
|||
::::[[User:Jimp|J<small>IM</small>p]]<sub> [[User talk:Jimp|talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Jimp|cont]]</sub> 23:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== SUGGESTION: "Remove unneccesary images" template == |
|||
I suggest that we create a template which can be added to articles that are cluttered with an incredible amount of image. |
|||
example: |
|||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Browser_wars |
|||
...I don't really know what images could be considered important there, but i can tell there are too many for the current article structure. A template for that would be a good thing in my opinion. |
|||
[[User:Tehniobium|Tehniobium]] 12:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Here you go. |
|||
{{Too many photos}} |
|||
--[[User:Ipatrol|Ipatrol]] ([[User talk:Ipatrol|talk]]) 00:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Tech-term-ambig == |
|||
On my wish list: |
|||
{{User:Rursus/tech-term-ambig}} |
|||
Reasons soon... <span style="color: #800000; background-color: #FFFFA0; padding: 1px 2px 3px 2px">''Said: [[User talk:Rursus|Rursus]] [[User:Rursus/OTHITPWMEEENAE|☺]] [[User:Rursus|★]]''</span> 08:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
{{User:Rursus/tech-term-ambig |
|||
|jargon=computer science |
|||
|term=text file |
|||
|discussion=Tech-term-ambig |
|||
}} |
|||
My reason: especially in computer science multiple meanings are wide-spread, the most commonly known example is between the programmers and the program marketers, causing [http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/M/marketroid.html mutual despise]. For a fresh example see [[Talk:Text file]], where a pretty harmonical discussion (except my hysteria) on term ambiguity occurs. When I saw the article on [[List (computing)]] and saw that LISP lists (which technically are ''pair trees'') are confused with lists in general (a generic term on data arrays - approximately - with varying meanings), I saw the need of the template. '''May I??''' <span style="color: #800000; background-color: #FFFFA0; padding: 1px 2px 3px 2px">''Said: [[User talk:Rursus|Rursus]] [[User:Rursus/OTHITPWMEEENAE|☺]] [[User:Rursus|★]]''</span> 09:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
It would belong to [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Contradiction and confusion|Contradiction and confusion]]. <span style="color: #800000; background-color: #FFFFA0; padding: 1px 2px 3px 2px">''Said: [[User talk:Rursus|Rursus]] [[User:Rursus/OTHITPWMEEENAE|☺]] [[User:Rursus|★]]''</span> 09:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:I made a search among the template categories and found the nearest template to be [[Template:Contradict]], but it doesn't refer to amboiguous definitions causing the contradiction. <span style="color: #800000; background-color: #FFFFA0; padding: 1px 2px 3px 2px">''Said: [[User talk:Rursus|Rursus]] [[User:Rursus/OTHITPWMEEENAE|☺]] [[User:Rursus|★]]''</span> 13:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== [[WP:DPP]] doc pages needed == |
|||
I just noticed a database lag situation that occurs because the templates are cross-included by (mostly, I'd infer) all referencing as a see also [[Wikipedia talk:Template messages/Cleanup]]. Since that page includes each template, updating the one causes an impact on all pages having cleanup templates. This line and such notes need to be in /doc pages insulated by a noinclude block wall. // <b>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</b><font color="green">[[User talk:Fabartus|nkB]]</font> 16:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== New plot summary tag == |
|||
Hello. I'd like to recommend that a new plot summary tag be added for ''nonfiction'' works like documentaries. I ran across this plot summary for Michael Moore's ''Sicko'': [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sicko_%28film%29&oldid=144305012]. I was going to tag it with the plot summary tag, but then noticed that the tag only references fiction works. I don't know how to make or add tags, so could someone with more experience consider adding this? Thanks. [[User:Citadel18080|Citadel18080]] 02:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== proposed article size template? == |
|||
I might be missing it, or might be proposing, but I think we need an article size tag. This would recommend trimming article size, by copy-editing and/or forking pages. Objections? Support? Already exists?--[[User:Cerejota|Cerejota]] 11:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:We do have {{tl|verylong}} already, which seems to do what you're looking for. [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 12:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== new template- is this useful? should it be added here? == |
|||
I just made {{tl|primary source claim}} to stick in an article I'm cleaning up. Should this be added here? Does this already exist elsewhere? [[User:Calliopejen1|Calliopejen1]] 11:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Requested addition of cleanup template == |
|||
*Template - {{tl|non-free}} |
|||
*Associated category - [[:Category:Articles with improper non-free content]] |
|||
*Wikipedia policy - [[Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria]] |
|||
*Section in which to add - [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Potentially unwanted content]] |
|||
'''Reasoning'''. The reason I'm proposing this cleanup template is that we currently have many templates to call attention to problems with specific images, but none to call attention to problematic uses of images in particular articles. A copyrighted image may be perfectly acceptable in one usage, but not in another. Some examples: |
|||
#An article about an actor with copyrighted screen captures of him in movie roles, being used to show what the actor looks like. (Example: Screenshots of [[James Bond]] films being used to illustrate the appearance of [[Sean Connery]].) The images are fine under fair use to depict the fictional character, but not the actor. (Probably violation of [[WP:NFCC#1]].) |
|||
#An article on a comic book character that contains 20 non-free images showing his appearances, where 2 or 3 would do the job just fine. Each individual image would be all right under fair use, but the aggregation is far more than is necessary for the article. (Violation of [[WP:NFCC#3]]a.) |
|||
#An article about a song containing screen captures of the song's video, solely showing the person singing. The screen captures don't increase the reader's understanding in a way words can't. ([[WP:NFCC#8]].) |
|||
#An article about a music style that contains a gallery of album covers to illustrate discussion of the genre. The album cover images all have fair use rationales for their uses in articles about the particular albums, but most don't have rationales for use in this particular genre article. ([[WP:NFCC#10]]c). |
|||
Not a lot of Wikipedians are expert enough on our non-free content policy to perform cleanup on articles themselves, but it would definitely help if others could add this tag to articles which seem problematic. If nothing else, it will point editors toward the relevant policies. Also, categorizing these articles allows actual image policy experts to review them and determine whether or not there really is a problem. [[User:Videmus Omnia|Videmus Omnia]] [[User talk:Videmus Omnia| <sup>Talk</sup> ]] 06:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Tried to cleanup the categories on this page == |
|||
I fixed as many of the templates on this page as I could, I replaced all the <nowiki>[[Category:..]]</nowiki> without <nowiki>{{{category|...}}</nowiki> around them on all the templates that weren't fully protected. [[User:Gudeldar|Gudeldar]] 18:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Use of icons == |
|||
I recently added an icon to {{tl|unreferenced}}; another user reverted it, and after [[Template talk:Unreferenced#Icon|some back-and-forth]] I think it would be a good idea to try to hammer out a quasi-official policy on the use of images in cleanup templates. --[[User:Bdesham|bdesham]] <font color="#007f00">[[User talk:Bdesham|★]]</font> 18:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I'll start. I think that icons should be included in all of the full-sized cleanup templates. As long as they are formatted properly, they don't change the size of the template, so that's not a valid complaint. I think that the instant recognition afforded by icons is very important and useful to editors—consider how hard it would be to tell apart all of [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup|these templates]] if they had no icons. Since the colors, size, and formatting are already standardized, the icons are really the only way to differentiate them quickly. --[[User:Bdesham|bdesham]] <font color="#007f00">[[User talk:Bdesham|★]]</font> 18:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:For me, I never look at the icons, I look at the text. If people don't want an icon on [[template:unreferenced]] (admittedly I am one of them), fine. [[User:Garion96|Garion96]] [[User talk:Garion96|(talk)]] 18:43, 12 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: There is a long history of editors suggesting and not finding consensus for adding an icon to {{tl|unreferenced}} you tried and did not find consensus on the talk page, and now you have moved the conversation away from the talk page of the template you want to modify in another attempt. When you still fail to find consensus then what, take it to [[Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)]]? [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 02:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::: I moved the discussion because people were claiming at [[Template talk:Unreferenced]] that the discussions on that page somehow applied to all other cleanup templates. It seemed that this would be a much more appropriate place to have that discussion, since more people are likely to see it here and we could potentially develop a policy to apply to ''all'' of the templates. I don't believe that a discussion on one template's talk page can validly be construed to apply to all of those other templates. --[[User:Bdesham|bdesham]] <font color="#007f00">[[User talk:Bdesham|★]]</font> 04:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::I agree that icons are generally a good thing and should be used in most cases. I also like the idea of a standardised style for each of the various template classes (in this case those for cleanup). However I have to say that the new icon is, to my eyes at least, quite at odds with the general WP iconset. Perhaps a general redesign might be worth thinking about, but at the moment the contrast between the highly graphical style of most existing icons, and the rather busier [[:Image:Text document with red question mark.svg]] is something which doesn't really look terribly professional. |
|||
::::Having said that, I don't necessarily dislike the new icon (though I think the '?' could do with being bolder/larger). I'd certainly be interested in seeing any proposals for developing this new style to create a general theme, but piecemeal replacement of one or two icons at the expense of WP's present graphical coherence doesn't seem the best step forward. |
|||
::::[[User:Xdamr|<b><span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:140%">X</span><span style="font-size:110%">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup></b> 00:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::: I designed the icon you mention. I honestly never considered that Wikipedia has a consistent icon theme… looking at [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup]] gives a ton of different types. No offense intended, but I don't think that there's any "graphical coherence" at the moment. Even within the citation templates: since I changed them ''all'' to use my icon, two templates have been changed to use different "question mark" icons, so that there are now three being used within that section alone. |
|||
::::: I'm not complaining about my icon being removed, but the use of three different icons for the same thing is ludicrous. I would be more than willing to participate in discussions about a unified icon set. A good starting place would be an existing icon set; I'm partial to the [[:commons:Category:Tango project|Tango icons]], as they're SVG and there are already a number of "standard" icons there. Anyone else interested in laying down some guidelines and/or actual graphics? --[[User:Bdesham|bdesham]] <font color="#007f00">[[User talk:Bdesham|★]]</font> 02:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::Yes, claiming there is blanket 'graphical coherence' is was probably a bit much - better to say that there is a generally coherent iconset out there, but that it is often not observed. Essentially it boils down to piecemeal, isolated changes to individual templates, when really we ought to have the big picture in mind. I too would happily contribute to a wider discussion on this issue, though my talents are less on the graphical side and lie more with criticising from the sidelines :) (Actually I know my way around Photoshop fairly well, but I have little familiarity with the field of vector graphics.) |
|||
::::::As an interim measure, pending a full discussion, perhaps it might be a good thing to go around and re-impose some stylistic order using some of the existing icons? |
|||
::::::[[User:Xdamr|<b><span style="font-family: Times"><span style="font-size:140%">X</span><span style="font-size:110%">damr</span></span>]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Xdamr|talk]]</sup></b> 15:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::: Maybe start by making a list of template types that might be appropriate for the same icon. Then work towards a standard icon by category. I would hesitate to attempt to mandate an icon that must be used, but a standard for icons if one is used could be helpful. Templates like {{tl|fact}} are not currently appropriate for an icon, others like {{tl|clean up}} have an attractive and communicative icon. No offense intended to you Bdesham but every couple of months someone plays around with some photo tool makes a new icon, or finds a new icons and then decides it is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Next they run around to every unprotected template and add their new icon without reading any of the talk page comments on the last similar attempts, or even seeking consensus before making the change. While it is good to be [[WP:BOLD]] in general, bold actions on templates can impact tens of thousands of articles at once and tend to bring less then warm receptions. [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 15:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::::::: I see that now ;-) and no offense taken. My objectives in changing all the templates were to (1) use a more specific icon ("information i" vs. red question mark) on the templates that already used icons, and (2) add icons to the rest for consistency. Clearly there wasn't a very warm reception to my changes; I feel, though, that there should be a definite policy on this, instead of asking users to look at e.g. [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Message boxes 2|thirteen different talk pages]]. (Another thing we should consider is whether or not we really need 13 templates related to verifiability issues; there is a lot of redundancy in those templates.) Anyway, I look forward to helping with some kind of policy on this. --[[User:Bdesham|bdesham]] <font color="#007f00">[[User talk:Bdesham|★]]</font> 18:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
I would agree that trying to build a policy on icons could be helpful to wikipedia. It would as you point out provide a primary location to address concerns and to point to for direction. I would strongly recommend not including discussion on combining templates in a discussion about icons. If you would like to take the lead on developing a policy I would be supportive of generating a policy, though you and I may have differing opinions on what that policy should be. I am still absorbing my recent experiences with a new policy attempt at [[Wikipedia:Requests for verification]] and am not ready to take the lead on something new currently. Of note you may notice that other then the immediate responses to your changes, only you and I have paid more then a passing notice of this topic. That could either mean that there is no significant interest in a policy about icon usage or that the has been a lengthy and failed discussion. I would suggest more research before considering the attempt. [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 15:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
: Just noticed a similar string starting at [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Template standardisation]] [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 15:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:'''Tango and SVG:''' This is just a note to concur with those who expressed a preference for Tango and SVG as part of a sound design strategy for standardizing template appearance. I have been doing something similar with WP articles, please take a quick look at [[User:Dreftymac/Docs/ImageDisclaimer#ImageNode_series]]. [[User:Dreftymac|dr.ef.tymac]] 16:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Doesn't SVG cause problems with transparency on IE browsers, since it's converted to PNG by MediaWiki, and IE (pre 7.0) doesn't handle PNG transparency correctly?--[[User:Father Goose|Father Goose]] 18:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==Why can't tags say either section or article?== |
|||
Some tags allow you to specify if they are used for the whole article (with '|article') or just a section but many (most?) don't. Is it possible to alter them to specify it?--[[User:Svetovid|Svetovid]] 16:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
: Using {{tl|unreferenced}} and {{tl|unreferenced section}} as an example they are separate tags because they put articles into separate categories {[[:Category:Articles_lacking_sources]] and [[:Category:Articles needing additional references]] Respectively). Some tags are selectable for section or article in fact {{tl|unreferenced}} used to be either or [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Unreferenced&oldid=42569806] until it was decided that it was only appropriate on article that had no references at all <small>''[[Template_talk:Unreferenced#Template_usage_no_references_and_undereferenced]]''</small>, you can see from the two category titles how this works out. [[User:Jeepday|Jeepday]] <small>([[User talk:Jeepday|talk]])</small> 19:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:: Come to think of it—if the category is the only reason for the separate templates, we should combine them into one template. The [[Help:Parser function|ParserFunctions]] can selectively put the article in one category or the other based on the parameters to the template. --[[User:Bdesham|bdesham]] <font color="#007f00">[[User talk:Bdesham|★]]</font> 02:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::{{tl|Article issues}} does this sort of thing. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 11:28 [[17 September]] [[2007]] (GMT). |
|||
For example, the template <nowiki>{{in-universe}}</nowiki> says "article or section" and you can't choose which.--[[User:Svetovid|Svetovid]] 02:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== TOC == |
|||
This whoppingly large page needs a table of contents! Else a pain to navigate. [[User:Jidanni|Jidanni]] 00:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Ummm... the [[MediaWiki]] software automatically generates one. Don't you see it? If not, check your [[Special:Preferences|preferences]], under the "Misc" tab, for "Show table of contents". For more info, see [[WP:TOC]]. —<small>[[User:DragonHawk|DragonHawk]] ([[User talk:DragonHawk|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/DragonHawk|hist]])</small> 02:08, 25 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== pointer to vandalism cleanup tags == |
|||
Add a link to where one can find vandalism cleanup tags. The word 'vandalism' is nowhere to be found on the page. [[User:Jidanni|Jidanni]] 17:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== On the surface "This article or section reads like a review" is not clear to template user or viewer == |
|||
For the "This article or section reads like a review" template, they click "review" to find out why somebody |
|||
may be mad that their |
|||
article sounds like a book review... only to find that their bland summary style article is now being accused |
|||
of soapboxing. Therefore the word "review" is unclear. |
|||
[[User:Jidanni|Jidanni]] 00:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Add "This article is written like a term paper" == |
|||
Add a template: "This article is written like a term paper". |
|||
"What might have fooled your professor into grudingly letting you |
|||
graduate shall not be dug up and fed into the encyclopedia verbatim." |
|||
[[User:Jidanni|Jidanni]] 00:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Wikipedia:Template standardisation == |
|||
The project to standardise the design of all the article message boxes is in its last stage. That is, all boxes like {{tl|wikify}} etc is going to get a new look. We are just some day from starting to convert all article message boxes to the new standard. So pop over to [[Wikipedia:Template standardisation]] and have your say before it is too late. --[[User:Davidgothberg|David Göthberg]] 14:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==In-line template for citations broken== |
|||
It's not very helpful to find <nowiki>{{Citations broken|date=March 2008}}</nowiki> applied to a whole article or section that has some good citations and some broken citations. Fixing the situation is more work than necessary. Sometimes I'd like to substitute an in-line notice of a broken citation clearly indicating which citation is broken. Accordingly, I have created [[Template:Citation broken]] and will try to figure out how to document it. |
|||
Would this be a good addition to this project? --[[User:Orlady|Orlady]] 00:27, 18 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== The ''whereisit'' description looks butchered == |
|||
It currently reads like this: |
|||
:''"This about a place does not specify the where it is located."'' |
|||
On its actual article page, it fortunately properly says: |
|||
:''"This article about a place does not specify the country, city or region where it is located."'' |
|||
I didn't edit this page although this should obviously be fixed, but I currently don't have time to read into how you actually do edit it, as it's a bit more complex than directly fixing it -- using templates for the tables, etc. Can someone please fix this up? — [[User:Northgrove|Northgrove]] 21:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Add <nowiki>{{Confusing|date=March 2008}}</nowiki> tag? == |
|||
Can we add this tag somewhere in this list of wiki tags? |
|||
{{Confusing|date=March 2008}} |
|||
[[User:WinterSpw|WinterSpw]] 06:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:{{[[Template:cleanup-confusing|cleanup-confusing]]}} is in the list of tags. It redirects to {{[[Template:confusing|confusing]]}}. |
|||
A tag already exists as: cleanup-confusing, and it looks exactly the same. --[[User:Ipatrol|Ipatrol]] ([[User talk:Ipatrol|talk]]) 00:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Suggestion: image/map/diagram fix tag== |
|||
How about: "One or more of the <b>images, maps, or diagrams</b> in this article needs repair or improvement." |
|||
I occasionally see articles where there are images, maps, etc that need improvement, such as: |
|||
*Poorly lit photos of things that should be easy to get better images of, such as album covers |
|||
*Scanned images used instead of a widget-created map |
|||
*Diagrams, maps, etc with poor color choices, an unusable legend, etc |
|||
Having a tag like this would allow graphics-savvy people to search for them and do fixes. [[User:Bry9000|Bry9000]] ([[User talk:Bry9000|talk]]) 17:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:Another problem I've seen are diagrams that are straight up factually inacurate. From what I can find, the procedure to request fixing them is extremely arduous, involving drawing up a request at wiki commons. However, I think the solution would be, not to tag the article, but to tag the image itself. This way, there is less doubt as to which image is a problem, and other articles that link to the image automatically get the same tag. (The further ability to put articles using flagged images into a special category, like "articles using images in need of cleanup" would be nice, but I don't believe there is presently code to support such a feature.) -[[User:Verdatum|Verdatum]] ([[User talk:Verdatum|talk]]) 17:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::I agree with you that the image itself, not the article, should be tagged. [[User:Bry9000|Bry9000]] ([[User talk:Bry9000|talk]]) 20:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I've found some templates for tagging these kinds of problems: |
|||
*Here's a general template: <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Cleanup-image|cleanup image]]<nowiki>|reason}}</nowiki>. |
|||
*The pages at Category:Image_quality_templates and Category:Image_maintenance_templates include some more specific templates for tagging image problems. [[User:Bry9000|Bry9000]] ([[User talk:Bry9000|talk]]) 20:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Proposal - "Selection criteria" tag == |
|||
I've been doing a lot of cleanup of [[WP:SAL|stand alone lists]] lately, and I ''frequently'' encounter the situation that there is no explicitly defined [[WP:SAL#Lead and selection criteria|selection criteria]] for articles that should be considered "partial lists". Without this criteria, the list can become indescriminate and infinitely long. Then an article that could potentially be salvaged goes up for AFD. I believe this is worthy of a cleanup template that would go either in the section on lead sections, or the section on lists. Since selection criteria can be any number of things, the template should possibly reference the article's talk page so a concensus on the criteria can be reached. Thoughts on this idea would be appreciated. -[[User:Verdatum|Verdatum]] ([[User talk:Verdatum|talk]]) 17:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== <nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}</nowiki> pairs == |
|||
The source of the page contains funny <nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}</nowiki> pairs like this: |
|||
:<nowiki>{{tlrow|fansite|{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}|category=Wikipedia articles needing style editing}}</nowiki> |
|||
Why is that? -- [[User:Ddxc|Ddxc]] ([[User talk:Ddxc|talk]]) 06:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Template Suggestion == |
|||
Wouldn't a template for cleaning up uncited facts specifically be a great idea? [[User:GO-PCHS-NJROTC|GO-PCHS-NJROTC]] ([[User talk:GO-PCHS-NJROTC|talk]]) 23:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Yeah, I think so and if there's one, it should say something like 'This article or section has too many [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|unsourced statements]]'. [[User:Martarius|Martarius]] ([[User talk:Martarius|talk]]) 23:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Reorganization/restructuring == |
|||
What's the difference? [[User:Peter jackson|Peter jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter jackson|talk]]) 12:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Need "remainder of section needs cleanup" template == |
|||
There's already a remainder of article boiler... there should be a remainder of section boiler. Perhaps <nowiki>{{cleanup-section-remainder}}</nowiki>. [[User:Jason Quinn|Jason Quinn]] ([[User talk:Jason Quinn|talk]]) 10:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Inline version of off-topic template has been created== |
|||
See [[Template_talk:Off-topic#Inline_version.3F]]. The template is {{tl|Irrel}}.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 04:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Templates out of hand == |
|||
I don't know if this is the place to write this, but it's really been striking me lately that the cleanup templates are getting out of hand. I don't know if anyone's calculated what percentage of WP articles have these tags on them, but it seems to be growing exponentially--presumably because it's much easier to point out that something needs fixing than to actually fix it. There's some justification for a tag like the neutrality one, because it serves as a warning to the user. But there's really no particular reason why users need to be warned that an article needs copy-editing or whatever--they'll notice that soon enough without our telling them. |
|||
For the vast majority of cleanup tags, if we really think it's helpful for people to point out work for other people to do, there's no reason why the tag can't be placed on the discussion page--where it can be tied to a discussion of what specifically the tag refers to, and maybe some kind of explanation/apology for why the tagger can't fix the problem themselves. The widespread use of cleanup tags in article space seems to violate one of the basic principles of WP, which is that WP is not supposed to be self-referential. Does this bother anyone else? [[User:Nareek|Nareek]] ([[User talk:Nareek|talk]]) 04:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:The proliferation of tags bothers me too. Just today I left the following on a talk page: "it's the whole "lighting a candle is better than cursing the darkneness" concept: how about helping make the page better like the rest of us rather than just throwing tags around?" [[User:UnitedStatesian|UnitedStatesian]] ([[User talk:UnitedStatesian|talk]]) 04:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:We've had this debate before (see for example the section "Proposed policy: Keep cleanup tags on talk pages" on this very Talk page). Tags in articles do have advantages: they prompt people to come in and join the editing fun; they apologise for the poor state of the article and let readers know that it falls short of our standards; and they are more visible and official - nonsense on talk pages can go unchallenged, but when someone puts a tag on an article it's more likely to be scrutinised.—[[User:Greenrd|greenrd]] ([[User talk:Greenrd|talk]]) 20:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
The fundamental concept of Wikipedia is that anyone can write and improve articles. And if that message is not clear enough, that is a concern for the overall design of this website. But if we keep putting tags on some articles and not to others, readers might feel that their contributions to articles lacking tags are less welcome. It might be a good idea to help people understand what they can do to improve an article. But such messages should go on talk pages. -- [[User:Kildor|Kildor]] ([[User talk:Kildor|talk]]) 08:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
===Reviving discussion on tagging guidelines (or, "tags as nags and tags as drags")=== |
|||
This section brings up an important issue that deserves more serious address given current trends, and the above remarks show considerable insight into the problem. Still, I'll make an attempt to elaborate in the interest of seeking progress on a policy/guideline end. (Please note that I'm referring in particular to the cancerous proliferation and enlargement of "multiple issues"-type tags, and not the more limited use of smaller and more informative tags that alert readers to article instability, like "Recently died" and "Current event". Also note that the philosophical perspective underlying my remarks is that of Wikipedia as [[gift economy]].) '''In a nutshell: The use of tags to top deficient articles does not serve a useful purpose, and on the contrary is counterproductive, both for the vast majority of Wikipedia users, who are non-editor readers, and for good-faith editors who seek to improve articles.''' |
|||
#'''Tags as blight.''' Tags are not merely ugly; they are distracting. The primary objective of any Wikipedia article needs to be ''to provide information about the article subject'' as quickly and cleanly as possible. (Corollary: The primary objective of a Wikipedia article ''is not'' to promote its own improvement or to point out its problems.) A visitor to a Wikipedia article expects, and has the right to expect, to learn as much about the subject in as short a time as possible. But a large multiple issues tag effectively supplants the article lead with a new, non-article-related lead that is negative in tone, providing the reader with the annoying stumbling block of extra text to parse. (For new or infrequent visitors unfamiliar with wiki process and protocols, this text may be confusing or off-putting: "What does all this have to do with the thing I was trying to look up? I just want to learn about widgets, don't burden me with your problems!" or "Geez, if this is such a bad article, can I really learn anything from it? Maybe I'm at the wrong place. Wikipedia is clearly not a good source of information.") When a reader arrives at a Wikipedia article, they are given the gift of the best shape the article happens to be in at the time. Tags might serve a useful purpose if they told a reader what information, specifically, they should not trust in an article, or what information they ought to ignore, or what information is incomplete and for which additional sources must necessarily be consulted. Some tags actually do this, and such tags are justifiably used when limited to article ''sections''. In the cases I'm concerned about, tags are merely nags. '''In the real world, no one would tolerate a graffiti artist who used stencils and spray cans to alert the neighborhood to his displeasure with its architectural insufficiencies.''' |
|||
#'''Tags as counterproductive to their intended purposes.''' All too often, when an editor adds a large "multiple issues" tag to the top of an article, the edit is followed by a revert or succession of reverts, and a protracted talk-page battle the crux of which is usually not the issues to which the tags pertain but the tags themselves. So it's clear to me that these types of tags, when used at the tops of articles, are a big energy sink for the system and have a net cost associated with them (meaning by definition that they wind up taking away more than they put in), because they are a friction on the system. The defense of one tag promoter is that placing a tag at the top of a talk page, rather than at the top of an article, is "hiding" the issue. I find this defense to be untenable (and not just because it is a bad-faith recrimination of the good-faith talk process): if talk space cannot be trusted to resolve article issues, what is the purpose of talk space? (Corollary: If talk space has a purpose, then its proper use is to successfully address article issues there.) '''We will do more to improve articles in the encyclopedia by limiting large tags to talk pages.''' |
|||
'''To sum up: Large tags are essentially talk content and we should not put up with talk going in the article space, not least for the reason that placing talk content where it belongs will be more beneficial by reducing internal resistance.''' [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 08:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: Your first point is undermined by your acceptance of certain "good" tags, which indicates that your problem isn't so much the strict separation of content and discussion as it is with certain tags you disagree with. Your second just doesn't make sense to me, probably because I'm one of those much-maligned editors who routinely uses tags as part of my workflow. The discussion page is for personal interaction; I'm actually opposed to including tags which pertain to the article page on them, because they distract users from the discussion. |
|||
: While a cleanup tag may be the equivalent of writing "clean me" with a finger on the back of a dirty van, it's no less of a "blight" than the dirt is. [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 08:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::My concern is that it's more akin to spray-painting the message on the windshield, given the fights that erupt over the issue. The "good" tags are good ''because'' they are content and not discussion: a "Recently dead" tag tells the reader that the article subject is recently dead; and a "this section contains disputed/POV information tag" informs the reader, watch out, political hot zone here, your mileage may vary. By contrast, "This article has multiple issues blah blah blah blah blah" isn't actually informative--it's babycry, a plea for attention rather than subject-related information. Workflow is a non-issue (lists of articles needing improvement by crack cleanup teams can be kept just as easily if long tags are placed on talk pages) and the tags need not interrupt or distract from discussion flow (they can be kept at the top). Given the amount of warring that goes on over these things, and the simplicity of the solution, this seems like a no brainer: give support to a simple guideline that says, "If a multiple issues tag is removed from the article page, it can comfortably reside at the top of a talk page, and business can proceed." Don't forget, it's a community van that everybody likes to drive, whether or not it has been recently washed, so let's not spraypaint the windshield. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 09:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::: But sticking it on the talk page is as obtrusive to discussion as sticking it on the article is to reading the article. Frankly, I don't buy the allegation that use of tags is increasing; I wish I could find a link to the investigation which showed that articles with even a single tag are a distinct minority on the project (less than 10%). If a user wants to bring the tag to talk for discussion then that's fine, but for copyeditors who roam from article to article acting on their first instincts to clean things up it is much faster to be able to do it all from articlespace. As your content/discussion argument is flawed by your acceptance of certain types of tags, the only argument you've got is that they're ugly - but this is subjective and can easily be fixed on either a user- or project-wide basis by changes to the site CSS. [[user:thumperward|Chris Cunningham (not at work)]] - [[user talk:thumperward|talk]] 10:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::''"But sticking it on the talk page is as obtrusive to discussion as sticking it on the article is to reading the article."'' When a reader goes to an article, he deserves to have the first things he sees be informative about the article subject. When he goes to an article talk page, he deserves to have the first things he sees be informative about issues related to the article's editing status. ''"for copyeditors who roam from article to article acting on their first instincts to clean things up it is much faster to be able to do it all from articlespace."'' [[Wikipedia:MOSDATE#Date_autoformatting|The recent decision to deprecate date autoformatting]] was based on the premise that it is more important to cater to non-editing users than to registered users, because the former make up the greater audience. While I disagreed with the decision because I enjoy having all dates in articles formatted to my preferences, I can accept it out of deference to the greater audience, for whom datelinking serves only a detractive purpose. The case here is identical. The audience for huge "multiple issues tags" is the comparatively smaller audience of (not just active editors, but) intensely proactive editors, and the encyclopedia's article space shouldn't be defaced with tons of non-informative tags for their benefit over the greater benefit of the encyclopedia (whose primary mission is to inform about article subjects, not to inform about itself). ''"As your content/discussion argument..."''--you appear to have ignored the premise of this argument in favor of repeating yourself. Certain tags are at least in part informative about the article subject. Others consist of bringing attention to an article's problems. For the reasons I have outlined it would benefit the encyclopedia to restrict the latter category to talk space when the tags are large and come at the tops of articles. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 15:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I randomly browsed 100 articles, and 56 had some kind of tag on it (cleanup, warning, stub etc.). 16 articles had a cleanup tag.... I think all tags should be removed, or at least be moved to the talk page. Or be converted to something less obtrusive, like FA/GA icons. --[[User:Kildor|Kildor]] ([[User talk:Kildor|talk]]) 11:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I repeated this experiment with a sample size of 200, and found 30 articles to have (non-subject-informative) tags at the top (15%) and 10 articles to have cleanup/multiple issues tags (5%). (For more on my methodology, see [[User:Robert_K_S/Tag_count_experiment|here]].) More interesting research would investigate how long article-topping template tags hang around on an article or how often they result in edit wars, but that reasearch is more involved than I have the tools or time for. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 17:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
* I very much agree that tagging does not work well at the moment. It is like red-pencil annotations in traditional paper-based editing and does not belong in the main online version which is, de facto, our current best effort. Ideally, there should be a system feature to control this such as a preferences setting which, by default, would suppress editing tags so that ordinary readers are not bothered by them. In the meantime, large header tags should be avoided since, as Robert says, these comments are better as a section on the talk page. There are already systematic templates for use on the talk pages such as to-do lists and project ratings. These ought to be used in preference. [[User:Colonel Warden|Colonel Warden]] ([[User talk:Colonel Warden|talk]]) 13:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
* Sorry but some tags are appropriate to the main article. Cleanup is vague and perhaps not needed. Original research, neutrality, citations, etc. Are appropriate to the main space. It lets the reader know that at least one editor has disputed content that is currently on the page and it might be worth their time to visit the talk page to find out why. Things like ref-improve, aren't that big of a deal to a reader. The reader deserves to know if there is some controversy or discussion about content on the page that may or may not be correct. Many people will take the article at face value and not necessarily run to the talk page to check it if there is nothing on the main space indicating any concern over any content. All "clean-up" tags should be moved to the talk page. Any dispute tags should remain on the main page. Editors need to stop looking at this tags as something bad. Just because the article you like has a tag on it you consider bad isn't some reason to edit war. Its a reason to discuss the issue and either fix it or form a consensus.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 01:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
**I largely agree. "Disputed content" and the like say "This content is fundamentally wrong and cannot stand", which is different from saying "This content needs improvement for all these standard various reasons." "Disputed content" tags should be limited to certain individual sections unless the disputed content is in the lead or the article has no sections. For the most part this is how they have been used, and further these tags are actually informative about article content, so these are not the types of tags I'm disputing. My problem is when we have a set of tags that do not speak to article content, tags that essentially say, "This article needs a lot of work"--as if that weren't true for most articles on Wikipedia--"somebody else do it". This type of message is appropriate to the talk space. Somewhere in the proliferation of tags (and their subsequent re-consolidation into the multiple issues tag) the spirit and intent of tags was lost. Tags are now used as a way to make an article scream and to punish the article until it is improved. (How many times does a tag-placer say in talk, "Don't remove the tags until the issues are addressed!") The worst are the tags that state the obvious: "This article needs to be wikified." Really? "This article needs copyediting." You don't say? There is no excuse for placement of such messages in the mainspace rather than in the talk space. It's time to get back to basics. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 19:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: I agree with the OP. If an article needs tagging to show other editors a particular deficiency, we should do so on the talk page to avoid distracting the reader. There will remain a few cases (e.g. where the article is in serious breach of a major wikipedia policy e.g. [[WP:NPOV]]) where we need to alert the reader by tagging the article itself, but for most minor issues the reader would be best served by not being confronted with tags pointing out these issues while they're reading the article itself. It is true that convenience for editors will be slightly diminished, but editors are not the primary audience for an encyclopedia article. --[[User:VinceBowdren|VinceBowdren]] ([[User talk:VinceBowdren|talk]]) 13:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::the ones that seem the very must intrusive to me & my first choices to remove would be "orphan"--a bot placed category for articles with three or fewer incoming links that is of no use whatever to any actual reader, and "deadend" for ones with no links to other articles--something which is obvious enough. Sure, these things need to be worked on, but they are not of key importance to understanding. {{unsigned|DGG|2008-10-04T22:56:06}} |
|||
:To respond to some of the points raised: |
|||
::"''Geez, if this is such a bad article, can I really learn anything from it?''" - Yes, that's exactly what we want them to think. We don't want people to think Wikipedia is always right because ''it isn't.'' An article with lots of style problems may also have content issues as well. The reverse of this thinking, if we move the tags to the talk page, is: "Wow, this article really sucks, is the whole site like this?" If we have tags indicating we realize the article is crap, people will hopefully realize that crappy articles are not the norm (or at least not supposed to be) |
|||
::"''when an editor adds a large "multiple issues" tag to the top of an article, the edit is followed by a revert or succession of reverts, and a protracted talk-page battle''" - Besides the fact that this isn't at all the norm (tags cause unrelated revert wars? what?), moving the tags to the talk page won't solve this, even if it is a problem, though I don't believe it is. I don't think I've ever seen a case where adding a cleanup tag triggers an edit war over something completely unrelated to the tag. |
|||
::Tags are supposed to be an invitation for readers to improve the article. Despite the text on the main page and the edit button on every page, many people really don't know that they can edit. We need new editors. It would be interesting to know what percentage of editors started editing to fix a problem in an article. |
|||
:This proposal seems to be almost entirely based on editors' assumptions of what readers are thinking, with no actual data behind it. We should not do such a massive change based on guesses. <font face="Broadway">[[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.]][[User talk:Mr.Z-man|'''''Z-'''man'']]</font> 21:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::The proposal is based on a desire to address a blighting trend that counter to its aims does not in most cases improve articles. I disagree with statements like "If we have tags indicating we realize the article is crap, people will hopefully realize that crappy articles are not the norm" and "many people really don't know that they can edit". The main page perpetually shows examples of excellent content and displays visibly the notification that anyone can edit the encyclopedia. The problem isn't that people who want to edit aren't editing. The problem is that editors are placing tags on articles as a lazy substitution for editing. If we want actually good articles, the solution is not to create tags that permit, perpetuate, or prolong bad articles that make excuses for themselves. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 17:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I'm afraid I don't understand why we would want to do this. Nobody goes direct to entry Talk pages, they go to the entry page. If I'm looking at an entry and see a template for cleanup on it, that might spur me to want to clean it up, but if the template is on the Talk page, I'll never see it. <font family="Arial">[[User:NurseryRhyme|<span style="color:dark blue">Little Red Riding Hood</span>]]''[[User talk:NurseryRhyme|<span style="color:dark blue">talk</span>]]''</font> 19:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::The primary purpose of a Wikipedia article is to present information about an article subject. Promoting its own improvement should only be a secondary objective of an article, and a message that an article needs improvements, which in virtually all cases are obvious upon reading the article, should not supplant the lead of the article. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 17:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::Are you advocating not putting "citation needed" tags inline, as well? <font family="Arial">[[User:NurseryRhyme|<span style="color:dark blue">Little Red Riding Hood</span>]]''[[User talk:NurseryRhyme|<span style="color:dark blue">talk</span>]]''</font> 20:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::::Not at all. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 04:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: My take on this: This all seems to be one editor, [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]], who has an absolute hatred of any tags on articles at all. I see in his example [[User:Robert_K_S/Tag_count_experiment|here]] that he is opposed even to the tag inviting readers to contribute sources they may know of. While there may be some tags that are useless on articles ({{tl|COI}} comes to mind), I don't see this discussion actually going anywhere due to the radical views of the proposer. I don't find tags to be a blight, or counterproductive (hint: edit wars are a problem with editors, not tags), and hiding them where no one will ever see them (be it at the bottom of the article or on the talk page) would be counterproductive. <!-- Don't expect a reply, I'm not going to argue. --> [[User:Anomie|Anomie]][[User talk:Anomie|⚔]] 10:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:: No, I am also suspicious of how useful such tags really are. And while I agree with you (Anomie) that I myself don't find tags to be that much of a blight, I think that my perspective (and that of most contributors to this debate) is skewed because we are all active wikipedia editors. I have plenty of experience (from my job as a software tester) of the user's perspective being quite different from a developer's perspective, and I think the same thing is true in this case and it is contributing to misunderstanding of the problem. I'll put the case in a deliberately over-simplified way: |
|||
:: * Wikipedia editors are engaged in the task of improving wikipedia; as such, they find tags useful. |
|||
:: * Wikipedia readers are engaged in the task of finding information in wikipedia (not information about wikipedia); as such, tags can be useful (for example when alerting them to unverified claims) but can also be 'harmful' (irrelevant, ugly and distracting). |
|||
:: * Wikipedia must allow both editors and readers to do their different tasks, through the same interface. It is also important to invite readers to become editors. |
|||
:: * There are many more readers than editors. |
|||
:: * Wikipedia has structures in place to hide editor-related stuff from the reader e.g. each article's talk page. |
|||
:: * Wikipedia has structures to show editor-related stuff to the reader e.g. the [[:Template:fact|citation needed]] tag, stub warnings. |
|||
:: * Editors often have particular enthusiasms preferences e.g. when members of a particular wikiproject. |
|||
:: * Being an editor can make it difficult to see things from the point of view of a reader. |
|||
:: * Tags placed on an article can be useful to editors but harmful to readers. |
|||
:: * The more prominent a tag, the more effect it has - either useful or harmful. |
|||
:: * Adding a single tag to an article is not all that harmful to the reader. |
|||
:: * However, the more tags there are on an article, the more harmful the effect is to the reader. |
|||
:: * The editor's perspective can easily make an editor amenable to adding a further tag to an article. |
|||
:: * Editors are often willing to add tags to articles, noting the usefulness to editors but not realising the harmful effect on readers. |
|||
:: * Editors actively voice their opinions on wikipedia. |
|||
:: * Readers do not voice their opinions on wikipedia. |
|||
:: * Disagreements between editors are often resolved by a compromise acceptable to all editors in the debate, without particularly taking into account the readers. One example of such a conclusion is the addition of further tags. |
|||
:: * Adding tags can have a harmful effect, but this is rarely taken into account by the editors proposing/adding such tags, nor questioned by other editors. |
|||
:: * Some editor-related information is best placed on the talk page. |
|||
:: * The harmfulness of tags can outweight their usefulness (depending on the subject matter, the relevance of the problem to the reader, the prominence of the tag and other factors). |
|||
:: * Editors naturally have difficulty taking a balanced view of the usefulness/harmfulness of tags they are proposing/adding. |
|||
:: In conclusion: In some cases editor-related information would be better on an article's talk page ''even though the tag is indeed more useful on the article page''. This seems paradoxical, but only from the editor's point of view; once the reader's aims and needs are taken into account it is less mysterious. |
|||
:: This can seem a bit like a cheating argument ("if you disagree you must be misunderstanding it") but it's not meant to be. I do genuinely believe that as editors we have difficulty stepping back from our enthusiastic wiki-editing to see the broader picture which in this case is necessary because of our intrinsic bias. --[[User:VinceBowdren|VinceBowdren]] ([[User talk:VinceBowdren|talk]]) 14:23, 9 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
I can see where these tags would seem unprofessional and a distraction to readers, and have seen several sardonic references to them in the press (ie [[The Register|el Reg]]) but still value them for their occasional effectiveness as a prod to editors. That said, I've seen a fair number of 6-12 month old ones recently - If they're not going to be acted upon..... |
|||
Well, it might make sense to limit the tags in mainspace to just a modified <nowiki>{{cleanup}}</nowiki> and time-sensitive deletion templates, if this does go through. I'm not at all sure it should, or endorsing the concept, but I do want to ask that at least one template in mainspace be retained to point to cleanup messages in talk-space and that deletion templates stay right where they are. Time-sensitive things like <nowiki>{{currentevent}}</nowiki> and (possibly) <nowiki>{{notability}}</nowiki> belong in mainspace as well, for the same reason that the deletion templates quite plainly do (and for the reason that the latter template is often a precursor to deletion). That said, it is too much of a PITA to ask editors to add two tags where once they added one. If you do this, it must be preceded by making a recentchanges bot that adds a modified <nowiki>{{cleanup}}</nowiki> indicating the presence of talk-page cleanup tags to the LEAD of the article in mainspace. Wouldn't hurt to rattle off the names at the bottom of that template in a curt shorthand. [[User:MrZaius|<font color="Blue">'''MrZaius'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:MrZaius|'''<font color="Blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> 01:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*We need the templates to stay on the article pages. [[WP:Wikipedia is not finished]], and where articles aren't as well cited, or complete, or clear, or whatever, as we think they should be, we should warn our readers. It's fair to them, and it takes better care of our reputation. --[[User:Hughcharlesparker|Hugh<small>Charles</small>Parker]] <small>([[User talk:Hughcharlesparker|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Hughcharlesparker|contribs]])</small> 14:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*Kind of funny someone started an statistical analysis of the problem when we have the [[special:MostLinkedTemplates|relevant population]] at hand. [[Template:Ambox]] is, if you will agree, the only such "cleanup box". At present, there are approximately 400k pages which use of the template: Out of ~2.5 million, that is less than 1 out of every 6 articles which have such a template. That is the best number in support of the proponent's position. While MostLinkedTemplates no longer functions (it was turned off), I would suspect that the percentage hasn't risen any due to the number of articles being added, etc etc. Furthering the position that it is unlikely that most articles have these tags on them, the next most-used maintenance template is [[Template:Fix]], which, you seem to be confirming would not be removed. The very first instance that I found (I may have missed one) of a box-template is [[Template:Unreferenced]], with a gracious 150k usages, 6% (1 in 16) of articles. Perhaps you will bring up the case that people use redirects, to which I will reply that there is a bot which dates the tags, and which also changes the tags from their redirect forums to their non-redirected forms (Ie, Template:Unsourced -> Template:Unreferenced).<br />The best way I feel, to remove the boxes, [[Template:Sofixit|is to fix]] the articles in question. If you think this impossible in some way (that's a lot of articles), then get some help doing it. Or go and help out — I'm willing to bet most articles with a box-tag have a WikiProject about them. I personally and vehemently disagree that they are getting in the way of the content: They are not printed, and I very much doubt they are going on the hard-copy of Wikipedia known as [[WP:V1.0|version 1.0]] (which, if an article has big problems, it doesn't go on the disc at all, so that's a non issue). Either way, I think you're looking to change something which really doesn't need to have time spent on it changing. Instead, go edit and fix an article with a box on it! --[[User:Izno|Izno]] ([[User talk:Izno|talk]]) 02:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
**"Wikipedia is not finished" and "so fix it" are actually arguments against adding tags. [[User:Robert K S|Robert K S]] ([[User talk:Robert K S|talk]]) 03:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Templates linking to pages which should not be read == |
|||
Is it advisable to have templates link to historical pages? These pages contain policies, guidelines, and practices which have been rejected by the community, so I find it quite imprudent to actually suggest to editors to read them. Links to such pages should therefore be avoided at all times, in my opinion. I have just located two specific examples: {{tl|cleanup-reorganize}} and {{tl|cleanup-restructure}} link to [[Wikipedia:How to structure the content]], which is a historical page. |
|||
I suggest that the links in question should be re-directed to [[Wikipedia:Layout]], an excellent page outlining the basics of article structuring. If there is no objection, I shall do this tomorrow. [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 20:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I have been thinking about the same issue. I agree that links to historical pages can be misleading. In addition to what you suggest, perhaps a subsection of the standard See Also section called Historical Documents or some such, for those editors who really want to see the whole history of a topic. For those of us who use categories a lot for browsing the project namespace, I'm thinking that a new category "Wikipedia inactive documents" to segregate all these. [[User:Libcub|Libcub]] ([[User talk:Libcub|talk]]) 00:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::Doesn't [[:Category:Inactive project pages]] cover you? All historical pages are tagged with the X-bearing template at the top, and that template also serves to categorise them. What did you think, that the Wikipedia community wouldn't have a cemetery where to bury its miscarriages? :-D |
|||
::On another note, I admit that I didn't understand the part about the ''See also'' section. I suppose you are talking about project pages, because it would make no sense otherwise; however, I was talking about the mainspace, which is where these templates appear. In any case, relevant pages are often mentioned in, and linked from, project pages, and if they are mentioned in the text they need not be in the ''See also'' section. It is a greater problem when there are links not acknowledging that the pages on the other side are historical... Hell, even the [[WP:DIR|department directory]] listed one not long ago. [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 01:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:::Update: Seeing that there is no opposition, I have just done the re-directs, as described in my first message. [[User:The Duke of Waltham|Waltham]], <small>[[User talk:The Duke of Waltham|''The Duke of'']]</small> 18:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== [[:Template:Memorial]] == |
|||
I've created {{tl|memorial}} to deal with [[WP:MEMORIAL]]. Feel free to add it to the relevant lists. <font color="404040">[[User talk:Skomorokh|<font face="Garamond" color="black">Skomorokh</font>]]</font> 14:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Undue weight? == |
|||
No template for tagging a source as possibly undue weight?<sup>[''[[WP:UNDUE|undue weight?]]'']</sup> --[[User:Nathanael Bar-Aur L.|Nate]] ([[User talk:Nathanael Bar-Aur L.|talk]]) 13:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Overlinked == |
|||
<!--{{Overlinked}} begin-->{{ambox |
|||
| type = style |
|||
| text = '''This {{{art/sec|article or section}}} may contain an [[WP:OVERLINK|excessive number of links]]'''.<br /><small>Please [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} improve this {{{art/sec|article}}}] by removing links to common words and duplicated links.</small><small>{{#if:| ''({{{date}}})''|}}</small>[[Category:Wikipedia external links cleanup]] |
|||
}}<!--{{Overlinked}} end--> |
|||
We could use something like this. I've just [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lee_Hasdell&diff=204371368&oldid=204361897 added] such a tag to an article but didn't want to create a new template in case there was one that I hadn't found. <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User:Jimp|J]]<small><code>[[Special:Contributions/Jimp|Ї]]</code><span class="Unicode">[[User talk:Jimp|Ѧ]]</span></small>[[wikt:User:Jimp|ρ]]</span> 03:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Oh heck, now ''there's'' a template I'll use. Thank you. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''TONY'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 12:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Okay I see that such a template already existed (with the same name), let's add it to this page. [[User:Jimp|J<small>IM</small>p]]<sub> [[User talk:Jimp|talk]]·[[Special:Contributions/Jimp|cont]]</sub> 23:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== This article or section == |
|||
We don't seem to know whether we're Arthur or Martha. You add a tag to an article & you know it's an article. You add a tag to a section and you know it's a section. Why not at least give editors the option to look like we know what we're talking about. It'd be as simple as <code><nowiki>{{{art/sec|article or section}}}</nowiki></code>. It reminds me of those userboxes with "him/her", "he/she", "his/hers", etc. ... I know whether I'm a boy or a girl ... but at least the userboxes don't get onto the mainspace. <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User:Jimp|J]]<small><code>[[Special:Contributions/Jimp|Ї]]</code><span class="Unicode">[[User talk:Jimp|Ѧ]]</span></small>[[wikt:User:Jimp|ρ]]</span> 03:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== '''Wikipedia bug?''' == |
|||
Please look at this: [[Wikipedia:Template_messages/Cleanup#Fiction]] and see the text ''This may fail to make a clear distinction between fact and fiction.''. There is something MISSING in-between! Now check [[Template:Fiction]], and you see that the text is correct this time: ''This '''article or section''' may fail...''. Why is this so? -andy [[Special:Contributions/85.179.58.60|85.179.58.60]] ([[User talk:85.179.58.60|talk]]) 09:30, 24 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:Looking at {{tlx|fiction}}, the text "article or section" is default message that can be changed by the editor— this is not documented. If you used {{tlx|fiction|section}}, then it would say "This section may fail . . ." The list of templates uses {{tl|tlrow}} to show each template. For some reason, it suppresses the default message of {{tlx|fiction}}. I added the text back in manually. --<i><b>— [[User:Gadget850|<font color = "gray">Gadget850 (Ed)</font>]]<font color = "darkblue"> <sup>[[User talk:Gadget850|''talk'']]</sup></font></b> - </i> 10:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== This empire has grown like topsy == |
|||
I've never looked through this complete list of clean-up templates. I'm shocked to find so many that are very similar. Why? Every one that is added, with a finely different shade of meaning, means that people have to be aware of its existence to be able to use it. The list is huge. |
|||
Much more practical and user-friendly would be a rationalised list (probably half the size), with the fluff removed. One template should do for both article and section, for example, not TWO. |
|||
In addition, the bright yellow in the ones at the top is just a glare; the "A" can hardly be seen. When did ''this'' happen? The old one was so much better. [[User:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">'''TONY'''</font >]] [[User_talk:Tony1|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font >]] 12:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Template for lists that need ordering? == |
|||
I can't find one of these, does one exist? If not i think one would be useful. if anyone can help it would be appreciated as i'm not that familiar with creating a template. --<span style="background: white;">neon</span><span style="color:white; background: black;">white</span><small> [[User:Neon white|user page]] [[User_talk:Neon white|talk]]</small> 14:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: Something like :- |
|||
<!--{{Unsorted}} begin-->{{ambox |
|||
| type = style |
|||
| text = '''This [[WP:LIST|list]] needs to be [[Wikipedia:LISTS#Organization|organised]]'''.<br /><small>Please [{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} improve this [[WP:LIST|list]]] sorting it according to a single criterion. For example alphabetical, numerical or chronological.</small><small>{{#if:| ''({{{date}}})''|}}</small>[[Category:Wikipedia external links cleanup]] |
|||
}}<!--{{Unsorted}} end--> |
|||
created the template as <nowiki>{{Unsorted}}</nowiki> --<span style="background: white;">neon</span><span style="color:white; background: black;">white</span><small> [[User:Neon white|user page]] [[User_talk:Neon white|talk]]</small> 22:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:One nitpick: the word "criteria" is plural. I suggest the text be changed to: ''Please improve this list by sorting it according to a single criterion.'' Note though that many lists are coded so that they can be sorted by more than one criterion. – [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 16:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::You might lexically order by one criterion within another: 1a, 1b, ..., 2a ... [[User:Peter jackson|Peter jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter jackson|talk]]) 10:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::: True. Not sure how to word that bearing in mind that the linked info at [[Wikipedia:LISTS#Organization]] does explain it too. --<span style="color:black; background: white; border: 1.5pt dotted black; padding: 0pt 4pt;">neon white</span><small> [[User_talk:Neon white|talk]]</small> 16:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== What template to use for see also that's too long? == |
|||
Per my question above, I'd like to tag long see also's sections that need pruning, like [[Social_class#See_also|this one]].--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 17:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:I have taken the liberty to create an appropriate template, the {{tl|toomanyseealsos}}.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 21:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== What template to denote edit warring? == |
|||
What template should one insert into an article which is so crippled by disputes, edit warring and interminable Talk page discussions that progress is rarely made (I'm thinking of some political articles here, specifically former Australian prime minister [[John Howard]] and the voting system [[Instant-runoff voting]])? The [[Template:POV]] isn't quite right - the edit warring results in a reasonable balance, it's just that the articles are still a dog's breakfast. Any other suggestions? [[User:Peter Ballard|Peter Ballard]] ([[User talk:Peter Ballard|talk]]) 04:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
: Even if there was one, I doubt it would survive long on an article that was the subject of an edit war. – [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 16:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==Confusion of Topic== |
|||
hey guys I think we need a cleanup tag that reads: '''"This article contains major factual errors which confuse the subject matter with another"'''. <br /> |
|||
I'm making it right now and placing it at the [[Victoria Peak]] page, which is a good example as to why it is needed.<br /> |
|||
I'll eaborate: Victoria Peak is a mountain located in Hong Kong; as oppose to what its name suggests; which is rightly-so confusing to all!.<br /> |
|||
Thus, most people confuse the luxury "Peak district" atop Victoria Peak to be "Victoria Peak". (I mean people in real life, not just Wiki; particularly english-speaking foreigners as they do not know the [[Chinese]] & [[Cantonese]] name of it. which specifies it as a mountain.)<br /> |
|||
As a result, the [[Victoria Peak]] article contains information that suggests Victoria Peak being "an actual peak" which is COMEPLTETELY ERRONEOUS!! On top of that there are exclusive information conveying the residence and entertainment that is available on the peak; which; although are actually on the mountain; further confuse the subject matter.<br /> |
|||
I'll clean the article up myself if time allows, meanwhile I think this tag might be of use since nothing like it exists here; or is close enough. |
|||
P.S. kudos to [[User:Adam_kevin]] for putting up this tag: {{gen-section}} which was made by me to deal with another specific article problem. He probably saw it and liked it lol :) :P<br /> |
|||
HERE, DONE THE TAG!: |
|||
<!--{{Confusing|date=September 2008}} begin-->{{ambox |
|||
| type = content |
|||
<!-- | image = [[Image:Circle-question-red.svg|40px]] --> |
|||
| text = '''Readers of this article may confuse this subject matter with [''another subject''] with insuffcient information on its relations with [''relevant information'']'''<br /><small> Please help by clarifying and ratifying the subject matter in relation with its [[''another sibject'']] [[relevant information]] . {{#if:{{{date|}}}|''({{{date}}})''}}</small> |
|||
}}<includeonly>{{#switch:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{ns:-0}}|Talk=[[Category:Accuracy disputes {{#if:{{{date|}}}|from {{{date}}}|}}]]{{#if:{{{date|}}}|{{#ifexist:Category:Accuracy disputes from {{{date}}}||[[Category:Articles with invalid date parameter in template]]}}}}[[Category:NPOV disputes {{#if:{{{date|}}}|from {{{date}}}|}}]]{{#if:{{{date|}}}|{{#ifexist:Category:NPOV disputes from {{{date}}}||[[Category:Articles with invalid date parameter in template]]}}}}}}</includeonly><!--{{Totally-disputed|date=September 2008}} end--><noinclude></noinclude> |
|||
Example- I posted this on [[Wing Tsun]] (See [[Talk: Wing Tsun]] for dispute/issue details). |
|||
<!--{{Confusing|date=September 2008}} begin-->{{ambox |
|||
| type = content |
|||
<!-- | image = [[Image:Circle-question-red.svg|40px]] --> |
|||
| text = '''Readers of this article may confuse this subject matter with [[Wing Chun]] with insuffcient information on its relations with [[Wing Chun]] & its [[Yip Man|lineage.]]'''<br /><small> Please help by clarifying and ratifying the subject matter in relations with [[Wing Chun]] & its [[lineage]] . {{#if:{{{date|}}}|''({{{date}}})''}}</small> |
|||
}}<includeonly>{{#switch:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{ns:-0}}|Talk=[[Category:Accuracy disputes {{#if:{{{date|}}}|from {{{date}}}|}}]]{{#if:{{{date|}}}|{{#ifexist:Category:Accuracy disputes from {{{date}}}||[[Category:Articles with invalid date parameter in template]]}}}}[[Category:NPOV disputes {{#if:{{{date|}}}|from {{{date}}}|}}]]{{#if:{{{date|}}}|{{#ifexist:Category:NPOV disputes from {{{date}}}||[[Category:Articles with invalid date parameter in template]]}}}}}}</includeonly><!--{{Totally-disputed|date=September 2008}} end--><noinclude></noinclude> |
|||
--[[User:WiKID Daryl|WiKID Daryl]] ([[User talk:WiKID Daryl|talk]]) 00:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC)la |
|||
:The template {{tl|distinguish}} might be useful. When using it for non-wikilinked items, subst: the template first, then edit out the double-square-brackets to turn the redlink black. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]])</small></small> 03:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
==arbitrary section break== |
|||
::'''Plagarised?'''<br /> |
|||
::I edited a usable customisable template and added it to a page i thought needed it here- Wing Tsun (see the latest;or my; entry in Talk:Wikipedia talk:Template messages/Cleanup. |
|||
::However, I found not long ago that my edit was "erased" mysteriously- no record whatsoever, and then I saw this template added by User: Adam Kevin. |
|||
::At first I thought he added it on behalf of my creation, but the disappearence makes me wonder if my edit was deliberately vandalised so he can take credit of it... |
|||
::Can someone please help me with this one? |
|||
::--[[User:WiKID Daryl|WiKID Daryl]] ([[User talk:WiKID Daryl|talk]]) 01:03, 8 July 2008 (UTC) |
|||
::[Retrieved from "[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Generalize]]"] |
|||
== Citation cleanup in tables == |
|||
It might prove helpful to have a template that would suggest that citations within a table could be improved by properly locating the citation in another part of the table. For example, the table in [[Falcon 1#Launcher versions|this article]] has a pile of citations at the bottom of the table ("<sup>[4] [5] [6] [7] [8]</sup>" but no information as to which source might support which of the myriad claims within the table. In this case, moving some or all of the citations to a specific column, or to a specific table cell, would make a lot more sense, and it would be easier to determine which data in the table may be poorly sourced, outdated or even [[WP:OR|original research]]. Does anyone else run into this problem in Wikipedia tables? If so, would it be worth considering a cleanup template for it? [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 15:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== Making template making easier == |
|||
I see several people making their own templates here. I think wikipidia should improve their help page on the subject or create a new one about making template tags. It would be a wonderful idea to allow more templates to be created. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.118.68.193|216.118.68.193]] ([[User talk:216.118.68.193|talk]]) 22:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==New templates== |
|||
Ipatrol added a bunch of templates, some of these have already been replaced with redirects. Anyone go time to remove them? ~~ |
|||
== Layout problem – do we have a tag for this? == |
|||
[[Ofot Line]] has a problem with overlapping images and other page elements. Do we have a cleanup tag suitable for this sort of problem? (I'm no looking for a solution to the problem on that page, just a template for such situations). __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 18:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:04, 13 October 2008
| ← (prev) | ↑(up) | (next) → |
| See also: assessed article categories. | Last update: |
| ← (prev) | ↑(up) | (next) → |