Robert Y. Hayne

Robert Young Hayne
United States Senator from South Carolina
In office 1823–1832
Preceded by	William Smith
Succeeded by	John C. Calhoun
Personal details
Political party	Democratic
Profession	Attorney, soldier

Robert Young Hayne (November 10, 1791–September 24, 1839) was an American political leader. Born in St. Pauls Parish, Colleton District, South Carolina, he studied law in the office of Langdon Cheves in Charleston, South Carolina, and in November 1812 was admitted to the bar there, soon obtaining a large practice. For a short time during the War of 1812 against Great Britain, he was captain in the Third South Carolina Regiment. He was a member of the lower house of the South Carolina state legislature from 1814 to 1818, serving as Speaker of the House in the latter year; was attorney-general of the state from 1818 to 1822, and in 1823 was elected, as a Democrat, to the United States Senate.

Here he was considered a conspicuous ardent free-trader and an uncompromising advocate of States Rights. He opposed the protectionist tariff bills of 1824 and 1828, and consistently upheld the doctrine that slavery was a domestic institution and should be dealt with only by the individual states. In one of his speeches opposing the sending by the United States of representatives to the Panama Congress, he said, "The moment the federal government shall make the unhallowed attempt to interfere with the domestic concerns of the states, those states will consider themselves driven from the Union."

Webster-Hayne debate January 1830

In 1828, in response to the changing economic landscape in Massachusetts (there was a shift towards the manufacturing sector), Daniel Webster backed a high-tariff bill that would preserve manufacturing interest in Massachusetts. This angered Southern leaders and brought Webster into dispute with South Carolina's Robert Young Hayne, producing what could be considered one of the most famous debates in American history, the Webster-Hayne debate of January 19-27, 1830. Hayne argued that his state had the right to overturn this particular piece of legislation, as states should have the right to control how their land was bought and sold.

Hayne stressed the fact that New England was not a major participator during the War of 1812. Webster had been elected to Congress in 1812 by the party opposed to the war with England. He was re-elected in 1814, which was noted as an indication that the people of the New England opposed the war. The debate arose over the so-called "Foote's resolution," introduced on December 29, 1829[1] by Senator Samuel A. Foote (1780-1846) of Connecticut, calling for the restriction of the sale of public lands to those already in the market, but was concerned primarily the respective powers of the federal government and the individual states. Hayne contended that the Constitution was essentially a compact between the national government and the states, and that any state might, at will, nullify any federal law which it considered to be in contradiction of that compact.

The resentment that the citizens of the southern states held towards the people of New England erupted on January 19, 1830, when Senator Hayne attacked the people of New England in a speech. Senator Daniel Webster responded on the next day. Senator Hayne spoke again on the 21st, 25th, and 27th. Senator Webster spoke again on the 26th and 27th. This was the famed "Second Reply to Hayne," still often considered one of the greatest speeches in American history. The final few paragraphs are generally noted for their passion. Webster concluded with the famed "Liberty and Union, Now and Forever, One and Inseparable!" line. Because of this debate, Hayne is generally remembered more for being the disputant with Webster, and for being on the receiving end of a famous speech, than for anything else he did while in Congress. This did bring the conflict between New England and the Southern States into the light, and served as a hard reminder of the resentment that many people the South felt toward the residents of New England.

Hayne vigorously opposed the tariff of 1832, was a member of the South Carolina Nullification Convention of November 1832, and reported the ordinance of nullification passed by that body on the November 24. Resigning from the Senate, he was Governor of South Carolina from December 1832 to December 1834, and as such took a strong stand against President Andrew Jackson, though he was more conservative than many of the nullificationists in the state. He was intendant (mayor) of Charleston, S.C., from 1835 to 1837, and was president of the Louisville, Cincinnati & Charleston Railway from 1837 to 1839.

He died at Asheville, North Carolina. His nephew, Paul Hamilton Hayne (1830-1886), was a poet of some distinction, and in 1878 published a life of Senator Hayne.

Further reading

• Sheidley, Harlow W. "The Webster-Hayne Debate: Recasting New England's Sectionalism" New England Quarterly 1994 67(1): 5-29. ISSN 0028-4866 Fulltext in Jstor
• Theodore D. Jervey, Robert V. Hayne and his Times (New York, 1909).
• Paul H. Hayne, Lives of Robert Y. Hayne and Hugh Swinton Legaré (Charleston, 1878)
• McDuffie, Eulogy upon the Life and Character of the Late Robert Y. Hayne (Charleston, 1840)
• Lindsay Swift (editor) The Great Debate Between Robert Y. Hayne, of South Carolina, and Daniel Webster, of Massachusetts (Boston, 1898), in the "Riverside Literature Series"

• This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

External links

• SCIway Biography of Robert Young Hayne
• NGA Biography of Robert Young Hayne
• United States Congress Biography of Stephen Decatur Miller

DANGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!