Biliary tract cancer

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Classification according to ICD-10
C22.1 Intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma
C24.0 Extrahepatic bile duct
common bile duct
cystic duct
hepatic duct
common hepatic duct
C24.1 Ampulla hepatopancreatica Father's papilla
C24.8 Biliary tract, overlapping several areas
C24.8 Malignant neoplasm involving both intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts
C24.9 Biliary tract, unspecified
ICD-10 online (WHO version 2019)

The bile duct carcinoma (medical cholangiocarcinoma or cholangiocellular carcinoma ) is a malignant tumor of the biliary tract . It is a rare tumor with an annual incidence of one to two cases in 100,000 in the western world, with the incidence rate increasing worldwide over the past few decades. Risk factors for bile duct carcinoma are primarily sclerosing cholangitis (an inflammatory disease of the bile ducts), congenital malformations of the liver , in East Asia also infections with the liver parasite Opisthorchis viverrini and the Chinese liver fluke as well as the (now prohibited) use of Thorotrast as an X-ray contrast medium . The symptoms of biliary tract cancer are jaundice , weight loss, and itching . The diagnosis is made by a combination of blood tests , imaging tests , endoscopy, and laparatomy .

Surgical removal of the tumor is the only option for treatment with a prospect of recovery. However, in most cases, the tumor is only discovered and properly diagnosed when the patient is at an advanced stage of the disease. In addition to surgery, chemotherapy and radiation can also improve treatment prospects. Patients in an advanced stage of the disease usually receive chemotherapy or palliative care. Research goals on biliary tract cancer are so-called targeted therapy with Erlotinib and photodynamic therapy .

Epidemiology

Age-corrected mortality rates for intrahepatic (IH) and extrahepatic (EH) bile duct carcinomas, differentiated by gender and country. Source: Khan et al., 2002.
country IH (men / women) EH (men / women)
United StatesUnited States United States 0.60 / 0.43 0.70 / 0.87
JapanJapan Japan 0, 23/0, 10 5, 87/5, 20
AustraliaAustralia Australia 0.70 / 0.53 0, 90/1, 23
EnglandEngland England / WalesWalesFlag of Wales (1959 – present) .svg  0.83 / 0.63 0.43 / 0.60
ScotlandScotland Scotland 1, 17/1, 00 0.60 / 0.73
FranceFrance France 0, 27/0, 20 1, 20/1, 37
ItalyItaly Italy 0.13 / 0.13 2, 10/2, 60

Bile duct carcinoma is a rather rare tumor. About 2,000 to 3,000 new people are diagnosed with the disease in the United States each year, an annual incidence of 1–2 in 100,000. The evaluation of autopsy series showed that the prevalence is between 0.01 and 0.46%. In Asia, the prevalence of biliary tract cancer is higher, which is attributed to the endemic spread of chronic parasitic diseases. The incidence of biliary tract cancer increases with age. Men get the disease somewhat more often, probably because of the higher incidence rate of primary sclerosing cholangitis in men. In the presence of primary sclerosing cholangitis, the prevalence increases many times over to up to 30%. Numerous studies have shown that the incidence of biliary tract cancer has increased in large parts of the world over the past few decades. The reasons for this are unknown. Improved diagnosis options and an increase in risk factors such as HIV disease may contribute to the increase.

Risk factors

Reproduction
cycle of Clonorchis sinensis

Various risk factors for developing biliary tract cancer have been described. In the western world, this primarily includes primarily sclerosing cholangitis , an inflammatory disease of the biliary tract, which in turn often occurs together with ulcerative colitis . From epidemiological studies it was concluded that the lifetime risk of developing bile duct carcinoma in persons with primary sclerosing cholangitis is 10–15%, although rates of up to 30% have been found in autopsy series. The causes of the association between bile duct carcinoma and primary sclerosing cholangitis are unclear.

Certain parasitic diseases of the liver are also risk factors for biliary tract cancer. The liver fluke Opisthorchis viverrini, which is widespread in Thailand , Laos and Malaysia , and its relative Clonorchis sinensis , which is mainly native to Japan , Korea and Vietnam, increase the risk of developing bile duct carcinoma. Patients with chronic liver disease, such as hepatitis B or C virus , alcoholic liver disease , or liver cirrhosis from other causes also increase the risk of biliary tract cancer.

HIV is also a potential risk factor for biliary tract cancer. However, it is unclear whether HIV itself or HIV-associated diseases such as hepatitis C are responsible for the link. Congenital malformations of the liver, such as Caroli's syndrome or common bile duct cysts, lead to a lifetime risk of 15% for the development of biliary tract cancer. Rare hereditary diseases such as hereditary non-polypous colorectal carcinoma and papillomatosis of the biliary tract are associated with biliary tract cancer. A connection with the occurrence of gallstones has not been proven. However, there is a link between the frequency of gallstones and bile duct cancer if the gallstones are located within the liver. This is unusual in western countries but is more common in parts of Asia. The use of Thorotrast , a form of thorium dioxide as a contrast medium , can lead to bile duct carcinoma even after 30–40 years. The use of Thorotrast has been banned because of its carcinogenicity .

Pathophysiology

Positional relationship of bile ducts and upper abdominal organs

Bile duct carcinoma can occur in any section of the bile duct system. Tumors that grow in the bile ducts within the liver are called "intrahepatic" and tumors that occur in the bile duct system outside the liver are called "extrahepatic". Tumors that occur at the exit point of the biliary system are called "perihilar" and those that lie at the junction of the two emerging from the liver bile ducts, are as Klatskintumore designated. Although bile duct carcinoma is known to be a tumor of the epithelial cells of the bile ducts, it has so far remained unknown from which cells the tumor develops. It is believed that it originates from a pluripotent stem cell in the liver.

Like colon cancer , bile duct carcinoma presumably goes through a series of developmental steps from hypoplasia to metaplasia and dysplasia to carcinoma ( adenoma-carcinoma sequence ). Therefore, processes such as chronic inflammation and narrowing of the biliary tract, which are associated with an obstruction of the flow of the bile, play a role in the development of this tumor. The histological picture of biliary tract cancer can vary from undifferentiated to well-differentiated tissue. The tumor is often surrounded by fibrotic or desmoplastic tissue. In the case of pronounced fibrosis, it can be difficult to distinguish a well-differentiated carcinoma of the bile ducts from a reactive epithelium. There is no completely specific immunohistochemical staining that distinguishes malignant from benign biliary tissue. Markings for cytokeratin , carcinoembryonic antigen, and mucins can be helpful in diagnosis. Most tumors (over 90%) are adenocarcinomas .

Symptoms and signs

Yellowing of the skin and eyes

The most common physical signs of the presence of bile duct carcinoma are jaundice , which occurs when the bile ducts are narrowed by the tumor and is typically painless, generalized itching ( that is, occurring over the whole body) (66%), abdominal pain (30– 50%), weight loss (30-50%) and fever (20%). To some extent, the symptoms depend on the location of the tumor. Patients with bile duct cancer of the biliary tract outside of the liver are more likely to have jaundice, and patients with a tumor within the liver are more likely to experience pain without jaundice.

Blood tests in patients with biliary tract cancer often show evidence of obstructive jaundice with increased bilirubin , alkaline phosphatase ( AP ), and γ-glutamyltransferase ( GGT ) with normal transaminase levels . This constellation of liver values suggests an obstruction of the biliary tract rather than an inflammation or infection of the liver , which are the most common differential diagnoses of jaundice . The tumor marker CA 19-9 is usually positive.

Diagnosis

Bile duct carcinoma can only be clearly diagnosed by examining the tissue. Tissue that is sufficiently well suited for a pathological examination can usually only be removed as part of an operation. Bile duct carcinoma can be suspected if a patient has obstructive jaundice. In patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis , clarifying the suspected diagnosis of biliary tract cancer can be very difficult. Such patients are at high risk of developing bile duct cancer, but symptoms are not easily distinguishable from primary sclerosing cholangitis. In addition, sometimes neither a mass nor a widening of the bile ducts can be detected in the corresponding patients.

Laboratory tests

There are no specific blood tests that can detect biliary tract cancer. The serum levels of the tumor markers Carcino-Embryonic Antigen ( CEA ) and CA 19-9 are often elevated, but they are not sensitive and specific enough to be used as a screening method. However, in connection with imaging tests, they can support the suspected diagnosis.

Sonography and computed tomography of the upper abdomen

Bile duct carcinoma in the liver ( tumor outlined in yellow)

If there is evidence of obstructive jaundice, the first imaging method used to visualize the biliary tract is often upper abdominal sonography . With this method the obstruction and widening of the bile ducts can be examined and in individual cases the diagnosis of bile duct carcinoma can be made in this way. The computed tomography plays an important role in the study of these patients.

Imaging of the biliary tract

ERCP image of bile duct carcinoma; a narrowing of the bile duct with a proximal widening (to the liver) is shown

Although imaging of the upper abdominal organs can be helpful in diagnosing bile duct carcinoma, imaging of the bile ducts with a contrast agent is often unavoidable. For this purpose, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), an endoscopic procedure, is the method of choice for gastroenterologists or surgeons. While ERCP is an invasive procedure with all of its associated risks, its advantages are that it can take tissue samples for diagnosis and insert a tubular implant into the bile duct to clear the bile duct obstruction.

Endoscopic ultrasound can be performed during ERCP to simplify the removal of tissue samples using a biopsy . In addition, a possible lymph node involvement can be better assessed and information about the operability of the tumor can be obtained. As an alternative to ERCP, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) can be used. The magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a noninvasive diagnostic alternative to ERCP. Some authors have suggested that ERCP should generally be replaced by MRCP when diagnosing biliary tumors, as this can also be used to diagnose the tumor and avoid the risks of ERCP.

Surgical diagnostics

A surgery of the abdominal cavity may be necessary to gain sufficient fabric material and a tumor staging to make. Occasionally, a laparoscopy may be sufficient, especially if more invasive measures are to be avoided. Surgery is usually only done on patients with early-stage disease.

pathology

Microfoto of a bile duct carcinoma (right in the picture), HE staining

Bile duct cancers are adenocarcinomas and are usually well to moderately differentiated histologically. Immunohistochemistry is helpful in diagnosing differentiated biliary tract cancer from metastases from other gastrointestinal tumors. Tissue smears are rarely diagnostically meaningful.

Staging

Although there are more than three current staging methods for biliary tract cancer (Bismuth, Blumgart, American Joint Committee on Cancer), none are well suited to predict survival. The most important staging criterion is the question of whether a tumor can be surgically removed. The decision about this can usually only be made during an operation.

General guidelines for operability are:

forecast

If surgical removal of the tumor is not possible because distant metastases are present, the five-year survival rate is zero percent, and less than five percent for all patients. The median survival time is less than six months for patients who are inoperable, untreated, and otherwise healthy if the tumor has invaded the liver through either the biliary tract or the portal vein.

In patients with operable tumors, the chances of recovery depend on the location of the tumor and whether it can be completely removed. Distal biliary tract cancer is usually treated with Whipple surgery . In these cases, the long-term survival rate is around 15-25%, although one series of studies has reported a five-year survival rate of 54% for patients with no lymph node involvement.

Patients with intrahepatic bile duct cancer usually receive a partial liver resection . In various studies, the reported survival rate was 22% to 66% and depended on whether lymph nodes were involved and whether complete tumor removal was successful.

Perihilar carcinomas are most often inoperable. If surgery is possible, so-called aggressive therapy is often chosen, which consists of removing the gallbladder and partially resecting the liver. A five-year survival rate of 20% to 50% has been reported for patients with operable perihilar carcinoma.

Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis who develop secondary bile duct carcinoma probably have the poorest prognosis because the tumor is usually only detected when it has progressed. There is evidence that aggressive surgical therapy, along with adjuvant procedures, can improve the prognosis.

treatment

Bile duct carcinoma is considered incurable and can quickly lead to death if the tumor cannot be completely removed. Since the operability of the tumor can usually only be assessed during an operation, a trial aparatomy (opening of the abdominal cavity for examination purposes) is necessary in most patients, unless the tumor is inoperable anyway. Adjuvant therapy methods after liver transplantation only play a role in a small number of cases.

Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation

If the tumor can be surgically removed, patients can receive adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy to increase the chances of recovery. There have been positive and negative reports on the question of the benefit of adjuvant therapy methods for biliary tract cancer. In no case have prospective and randomized studies been carried out to date (March 2007) . In those cases in which the tumor has been completely removed (tissue margin negative), adjuvant chemotherapy is of no use. The benefit of combined chemoradiotherapy is not clear. If the tumor could only be removed incompletely (tissue margin positive), based on the current study situation, chemoradiotherapy is recommended.

Treatment of advanced disease

In the majority of cases, bile duct carcinoma presents as an inoperable tumor. In these cases, patients are treated with palliative chemotherapy with or without radiation . It could in randomized shown studies that chemotherapy in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma quality of life improves and prolongs life expectancy.

There is no generally binding chemotherapy regimen for biliary tract cancer and it is recommended that such patients should be included in studies wherever possible. The following chemotherapeutic agents are used in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: fluorouracil together with folinic acid , gemcitabine as a single preparation, or in combination with cisplatin , irinotecan or capecitabine . A combination therapy with gemcitabine and cis-platinum (also oxaliplatin, "GEMOX", if kidney function is impaired ) is currently (2015) the standard therapy for first-line therapy .

Experimental procedure

A small pilot study demonstrated limited use for the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Erlotinib . The photodynamic therapy is an experimental method in which the patient a light-sensitive drug is injected, and then the tumor is irradiated with light endoscopically. In a small randomized study, the first results were obtained with this method. Overall, however, the benefits of the process cannot yet be foreseen.

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. ^ A b S. Landis, T. Murray, S. Bolden, P. Wingo: Cancer statistics, 1998 . In: Cancer J Clin , 48, 1, pp. 6-29, PMID 9449931
  2. ^ T. Patel: Worldwide trends in mortality from biliary tract malignancies . In: BMC Cancer , 2, 10, PMID 11991810
  3. ^ S. Khan, S. Taylor-Robinson, M. Toledano, A. Beck, P. Elliott, H. Thomas: Changing international trends in mortality rates for liver, biliary and pancreatic tumours . In: J Hepatol , 37, 6, 2002, pp. 806-813, PMID 12445422
  4. J. Vauthey, L. Blumgart: Recent advances in the management of cholangiocarcinomas . In: Semin Liver Dis , 14, 2, 1994, pp. 109-114, PMID 8047893
  5. D. Henson, J. Albores-Saavedra, D. Corle: Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Histologic types, stage of disease, grade, and survival rates . In: Cancer , 70, 6, 1991, pp. 1498-1501, PMID 1516001
  6. a b c C. Rosen, D. Nagorney, R. Wiesner, R. Coffey, N. la Russo: Cholangiocarcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis . In: Ann Surg , 213, 1, 1991, pp. 21-25, PMID 1845927
  7. Several independent studies have indicated a steady increase in the incidence of biliary tract cancer worldwide:
    • T. Patel: Worldwide trends in mortality from biliary tract malignancies . In: BMC Cancer , 2, p. 10, PMID 11991810
    • T. Patel: Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States Hepatology 33, 6, 2001, pp. 1353-1357, PMID 11391522
    • Y. Shaib, J. Davila, K. Mc Glynn, H. El-Serag (2004): Rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a true increase? In: J Hepatol , 40, 3, pp. 472-477, PMID 15123362
    • J. West, H. Wood, R. Logan, M. Quinn, G. Aithal: Trends in the incidence of primary liver and biliary tract cancers in England and Wales 1971-2001 . In: Br J Cancer , 94, 11, 2006, pp. 1751-1758, PMID 16736026
    • S. Khan, S. Taylor-Robinson, M. Toledano, A. Beck, P. Elliott, H. Thomas: Changing international trends in mortality rates for liver, biliary and pancreatic tumors . In: J Hepatol , 37, 6, 2002, pp. 806-813, PMID 12445422
    • T. Welzel, K. Mc Glynn, A. Hsing, T. O'Brien, R. Pfeiffer: Impact of classification of hilar cholangiocarcinomas (Klatskin tumors) on the incidence of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States . In: J Natl Cancer Inst , 98, 12, 2005, pp. 873-875, PMID 16788161
  8. ^ A b c Y. Shaib, H. El-Serag, J. Davila, R. Morgan, K. Mc Glynn: Risk factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a case-control study . In: Gastroenterology , 128, 3, 2005, pp. 620-626, PMID 15765398
  9. ^ R. Chapman: Risk factors for biliary tract carcinogenesis. Ann Oncol 10, 4, pp. 308-311, PMID 10436847
  10. Epidemiological studies that examined the incidence of bile duct carcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis are as follows:
    • A. Bergquist, A. Ekbom, R. Olsson, D. Kornfeldt, L. Lööf, A. Danielsson, R. Hultcrantz, S. Lindgren, H. Prytz, H. Sandberg-Gertzén, S. Almer, F. Granath, U. Broomé: Hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis . In: J Hepatol , 36, 3, 2002, pp. 321-327, PMID 11867174
    • A. Bergquist, H. Glaumann, B. Persson, U. Broomé: Risk factors and clinical presentation of hepatobiliary carcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case-control study . In: Hepatology , 27, 2, 1998, pp. 311-316, PMID 9462625
    • K. Burak, P. Angulo, T. Pasha, K. Egan, J. Petz, K. Lindor: Incidence and risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis . In: Am J Gastroenterol , 99, 3, 2004, pp. 523-526, PMID 15056096
  11. P. Watanapa: cholangiocarcinoma in patients with opisthorchiasis . In: Br J Surg , 83, 8, 1996, pp. 1062-1064, PMID 8869303
  12. P. Watanapa, W. Watanapa: Liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma . In: Br J Surg , 89, 8, 2002, pp. 962-970, PMID 12153620
  13. H. Shin, C. Lee, H. Park, S. Seol, J. Chung, H. Choi, Y. Ahn, T. Shigemastu (1996): Hepatitis B and C virus, Clonorchis sinensis for the risk of liver cancer : a case-control study in Pusan, Korea . In: Int J Epidemiol , 25, 5, pp. 933-940, PMID 8921477
  14. M. Kobayashi, K. Ikeda, S. Saitoh, F. Suzuki, A. Tsubota, Y. Suzuki, Y. Arase, N. Murashima, K. Chayama, H. Kumada: Incidence of primary cholangiocellular carcinoma of the liver in Japanese patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis . In: Cancer , 88, 11, 2000, pp. 2471-2477, PMID 10861422
  15. S. Yamamoto, S. Kubo, S. Hai, T. Uenishi, T. Yamamoto, T. Shuto, S. Takemura, H. Tanaka, O. Yamazaki, K. Hirohashi, T. Tanaka: Hepatitis C virus infection as a likely etiology of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma . In: Cancer Sci , 95, 7, 2004, pp. 592-595, PMID 15245596
  16. H. Lu, M. Ye, S. Thung, S. Dash, M. Gerber: Detection of hepatitis C virus RNA sequences in cholangiocarcinomas in Chinese and American patients . In: Chinese Medical Journal , (English), 113, 12, 2000, pp. 1138-1141, PMID 11776153
  17. H. Sorensen, S. Friis, J. Olsen, A. Thulstrup, L. Mellemkjaer, M. Linet, D. Trichopoulos, H. Vilstrup, J. Olsen: Risk of liver and other types of cancer in patients with cirrhosis: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark . In: Hepatology , 28, 4, 1998, pp. 921-925, PMID 9755226
  18. ^ P. Lipsett, H. Pitt, P. Colombani, J. Boitnott, J. Cameron: Choledochal cyst disease. A changing pattern of presentation . In: Ann Surg , 220, 5, 1994, pp. 644-652, PMID 7979612
  19. ^ M. Dayton, W. Longmire, R. Tompkins (1983): Caroli's Disease: a premalignant condition? In: Am J Surg , 145, 1, pp. 41-48, PMID 6295196
  20. J. Mecklin, H. Järvinen, M. Virolainen: The association between cholangiocarcinoma and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma . In: Cancer , 69, 5, 2004, pp. 1112-1114, PMID 1310886
  21. S. Lee, M. Kim, S. Jang, M. Song, K. Kim, H. Kim, D. Seo, D. Song, E. Yu, Y. Min: Clinicopathologic review of 58 patients with biliary papillomatosis . In: Cancer , 100, 4, 2004, pp. 783-793, PMID 14770435
  22. C. Lee, C. Wu, G. Chen (2002): What is the impact of coexistence of hepatolithiasis on cholangiocarcinoma? In: J Gastroenterol Hepatol , 17, 9, pp. 1015-1020, PMID 12167124
  23. C. Su, Y. Shyr, W. Lui, F. P'Eng: Hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma . In: Br J Surg , 84, 7, 1997, pp. 969-973, PMID 9240138
  24. F. Donato, U. Gelatti, A. Tagger, M. Favret, M. Ribero, F. Callea, C. Martelli, A. Savio, P. Trevisi, G. Nardi: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatitis C and B virus infection , alcohol intake, and hepatolithiasis: a case-control study in Italy . In: Cancer Causes & Control , 12, 10, 2001, pp. 959-964, PMID 11808716
  25. D. Sahani, S. Prasad, K. Tannabe, P. Hahn, P. Mueller, S. Saini: Thorotrast-induced cholangiocarcinoma: case report. Abdom Imaging 28, 1, pp. 72-74, PMID 12483389
  26. A. Zhu, G. Lauwers, K. Tanabe: Cholangiocarcinoma in association with Thorotrast exposure J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 11, 6, 2004, pp. 430-433, PMID 15619021
  27. ^ Klatskin G .: Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. An unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. in: Am J Med 38, pp. 241-256, PMID 14256720
  28. T. Roskams: Liver stem cells and their implication in hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma . In: Oncogene , 25, 27, 2006, pp. 3818-3822, PMID 16799623
  29. C. Liu, J. Wang, Q. Ou: Possible stem cell origin of human cholangiocarcinoma . In: World J Gastroenterol , 10, 22, 2004, pp. 3374-3376, PMID 15484322
  30. ^ S. Sell, H. Dunsford: Evidence for the stem cell origin of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma . In: Am J Pathol , 134, 6, 1989, pp. 1347-1363, PMID 2474256
  31. a b A. Sirica: Cholangiocarcinoma: molecular targeting strategies for chemoprevention and therapy . In: Hepatology , 41, 1, 2005, pp. 5-15, PMID 15690474
  32. F. Holzinger, K. Z'graggen, M. Büchler: Mechanisms of biliary carcinogenesis: a pathogenetic multi-stage cascade towards cholangiocarcinoma . In: Ann Oncol , 10 Suppl 4, pp. 122-126, PMID 10436802
  33. ^ G. Gores: Cholangiocarcinoma: current concepts and insights . In: Hepatology , 37, 5, 2003, pp. 961-969, PMID 12717374
  34. P. de Groen, G. Gores, N. LaRusso, L. Gunderson, D. Nagorney: Biliary tract cancers . In: NEJM , 341, 18, 1999, pp. 1368-1378, PMID 10536130
  35. D. Henson, J. Albores-Saavedra, D. Corle: Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Histologic types, stage of disease, grade, and survival rates . In: Cancer , 70, 6, 1992, pp. 1498-1501, PMID 1516001
  36. D. Nagorney, J. Donohue, M. Farnell, C. Schleck, D. Ilstrup: Outcomes after curative resections of cholangiocarcinoma . In: Arch Surg , 128, 8, 1993, pp. 871-877, discussion pp. 877-879, PMID 8393652
  37. a b A. Nakeeb, H. Pitt, T. Sohn, J. Coleman, R. Abrams, S. Piantadosi, R. Hruban, K. Lillemoe, C. Yeo, J. Cameron: Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors . In: Ann Surg , 224, 4, 1996, pp. 463-473, discussion pp. 473-475, PMID 8857851
  38. a b c d Mark Feldman, Lawrence S. Friedman, Lawrence J. Brandt (Eds.): Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease , 8th Edition, Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier, July 21, 2006, ISBN 978-1 -4160-0245-1 , pp. 1493-1496 (accessed May 5, 2008).
  39. Studies on the benefit of detecting tumor markers for bile duct carcinoma such as CEA and CA 19-9 in patients with or without primary sclerosing cholangitis:
    • O. Nehls, M. Gregor, B. Klump: Serum and bile markers for cholangiocarcinoma . In: Semin Liver , Dis 24, 2, 2004, pp. 139-154, PMID 15192787
    • E. Siqueira, R. Schoen, W. Silverman, J. Martin, M. Rabinovitz, J. Weissfeld, K. Abu-Elmaagd, J. Madariaga, A. Slivka, J. Martini: Detecting cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis Gastrointest Endosc 56, 1, 2002, pp. 40-47, PMID 12085033
    • C. Levy, J. Lymp, P. Angulo, G. Gores, N. Larusso, K. Lindor: (2005) The value of serum CA 19-9 in predicting cholangiocarcinomas in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. in: Dig Dis Sci 50,9 , pp. 1734-1740, PMID 16133981
    • A. Patel, D. Harnois, G. Klee, N. La Russo, G. Gores: (2000) The utility of CA 19-9 in the diagnoses of cholangiocarcinoma in patients without primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 95, 1, pp. 204-207, PMID 10638584
  40. ^ S. Saini: Imaging of the hepatobiliary tract . In: NEJM , 336, 26, 1997, pp. 1889-1894, PMID 9197218
  41. M. Sharma, V. Ahuja: Aetiological spectrum of obstructive jaundice and diagnostic ability of ultrasonography: a clinician's perspective . In: Trop Gastroenterol , 20, 4, pp. 167-169, PMID 10769604
  42. C. Bloom, B. Langer, S. Wilson: Role of US in the detection, characterization, and staging of cholangiocarcinoma . In: Radiographics , 19, 5, pp. 1199-1218, PMID 10489176
  43. C. Valls, A. Gumà, I. Puig, A. Sanchez, E. Andía, T. Serrano, J. Figueras: Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: CT evaluation . In: Abdom Imaging , 25, 5, pp. 490-496, PMID 10931983
  44. ^ M. Tillich, H. Mischinger, K. Preisegger, H. Rabl, D. Szolar: Multiphasic helical CT in diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma . In: AJR Am J Roentgenol , 171, 3, 1998, pp. 651-658, PMID 9725291
  45. ^ Y. Zhang, M. Uchida, T. Abe, H. Nishimura, N. Hayabuchi, Y. Nakashima: Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of dynamic CT and dynamic MRI . In: J Comput Assist Tomogr , 23, 5, pp. 670-677, PMID 10524843
  46. M. Sugiyama, H. Hagi, Y. Atomi, M. Saito: Diagnosis of portal venous invasion by pancreatobiliary carcinoma: value of endoscopic ultrasonography . In: Abdom Imaging , 22, 4, pp. 434-438, PMID 9157867
  47. L. Schwartz, F. Coakley, Y. Sun, L. Blumgart, Y. Fong, D. Panicek: Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography . In: AJR Am J Roentgenol , 170, 6, 1998, pp. 1491-1495, PMID 9609160
  48. ^ S. Zidi, F. Prat, O. le Guen, Y. Rondeau, G. Pelletier: Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures . In: Gut , 46, 1, 2000, pp. 103-106, PMID 10601064
  49. M. Lee, K. Park, Y. Shin, H. Yoon, K. Sung, M. Kim, S. Lee, E. Kang: Preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady- state precession magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography . In: World Journal of Surgery , 27, 3, 2003, pp. 278-283, PMID 12607051
  50. T. Yeh, Y. Jan, J. Tseng, C. Chiu, T. Chen, T. Hwang, M. Chen: Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings . In: Am J Gastroenterol , 95, 2, 2000, pp. 432-440, PMID 10685746
  51. M. Freeman, T. Sielaff: A modern approach to malignant hilar biliary obstruction . In: Rev Gastroenterol Disord , 3, 4, 2003, pp. 187-201, PMID 14668691
  52. J. Szklaruk, E. Tamm, C. Charnsangavej: Preoperative imaging of biliary tract cancers . In: Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America , 11, 4, 2002, pp. 865-876, PMID 12607576
  53. ^ S. Weber, R. de Matteo, Y. Fong, L. Blumgart, W. Jarnagin: Staging laparoscopy in patients with extrahepatic biliary carcinoma. Analysis of 100 patients . In: Ann Surg , 235, 3, 2002, pp. 392-399, PMID 11882761
  54. M. Callery, S. Strasberg, G. Doherty, N. Soper, J. Norton: Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography: optimizing resectability in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancy . In: J Am Coll Surg , 185, 1, 1997, pp. 33-39, PMID 9208958
  55. F. Länger, R. von Wasielewski, HH Kreipe: (2006) The importance of immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinomas . In: Pathologe , 27, 4, pp. 244-250, PMID 16758167
  56. ^ PE Darwin, A. Kennedy: Cholangiocarcinoma. eMedicine.com. URL: emedicine.com Retrieved May 5, 2007.
  57. E. Zervos, D. Osborne, S. Goldin, D. Villadolid, D. Thometz, A. Durkin, L. Carey, A. Rosemurgy: Stage does not predict survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinomas promoting an aggressive operative approach . In: Am J Surg , 190, 5, 2005, pp. 810-815, PMID 16226963
  58. J. Tsao, Y. Nimura, J. Kamiya, N. Hayakawa, S. Kondo, M. Nagino, M. Miyachi, M. Kanai, K. Uesaka, K. Oda, R. Rossi, J. Braasch, J Dugan: Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of an American and a Japanese experience . In: Ann Surg , 232, 2, 2004, pp. 166-174, PMID 10903592
  59. ^ V. Rajagopalan, W. Daines, M. Grossbard, P. Kozuch: Gallbladder and biliary tract carcinoma: A comprehensive update, Part 1 . In: Oncology (Williston Park) , 18, 7, 2004, pp. 889-896, PMID 15255172
  60. M. Yamamoto, K. Takasaki, T. Yoshikawa: Lymph Node Metastasis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma . In: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology , 29, 3, 1999, pp. 147-150.
  61. D. Farley, A. Weaver, D. Nagorney: "Natural history" of unresected cholangiocarcinoma: patient outcome after noncurative intervention . In: Mayo Clin Proc , 70, 5, 1995, pp. 425-429, PMID 7537346
  62. ^ MK Grove, RE Hermann, DP Vogt, TA Broughan: Role of radiation after operative palliation in cancer of the proximal bile ducts Am J Surg 161, 1991, pp. 454-458.
  63. The result of tumor surgery on distal bile duct carcinomas was examined in the following studies:
    • A. Nakeeb, H. Pitt, T. Sohn, J. Coleman, R. Abrams, S. Piantadosi, R. Hruban, K. Lillemoe, C. Yeo, J. Cameron: Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors in: Ann Surg 224, 4, 1996, pp. 463-473, discussion pp. 473-475, PMID 8857851
    • D. Nagorney, J. Donohue, M. Farnell, C. Schleck, D. Ilstrup: Outcomes after curative resections of cholangiocarcinoma . In: Arch Surg , 128, 8, 1993, pp. 871-877, discussion pp. 877-879, PMID 8393652
    • J. Jang, S. Kim, D. Park, Y. Ahn, Y. Yoon, M. Choi, K. Suh, K. Lee, Y. Park: Actual long-term outcome of extrahepatic bile duct cancer after surgical resection . In: Ann Surg , 241, 1, 2005, pp. 77-84, PMID 15621994
    • L. Bortolasi, L. Burgart, G. Tsiotos, E. Luque-De León, M. Sarr: Adenocarcinoma of the distal bile duct. A clinicopathologic outcome analysis after curative resection . In: Digestive Surgery , 17, 1, 2000, pp. 36-41, PMID 10720830
    • Y. Fong, L. Blumgart, E. Lin, J. Fortner, M. Brennan: Outcome of treatment for distal bile duct cancer Br J Surg 83, 12, 1996, pp. 1712-1715, PMID 9038548
  64. The result of tumor surgery for intrahepatic bile duct carcinomas was examined in the following studies:
    • A. Nakeeb, H. Pitt, T. Sohn, J. Coleman, R. Abrams, S. Piantadosi, R. Hruban, K. Lillemoe, C. Yeo, J. Cameron: Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors . In: Ann Surg , 224, 4, 1996, pp. 463-473, discussion pp. 473-475, PMID 8857851 .
    • M. Lieser, M. Barry, C. Rowland, D. Ilstrup, D. Nagorney: Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a 31-year experience . In: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg , 5, 1, 1998, pp. 41-47, PMID 9683753
    • A. Valverde, N. Bonhomme, O. Farges, A. Sauvanet, J. Flejou, J. Belghiti: Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a Western experience . In: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg , 6, 2, 1999, pp. 122-127, PMID 10398898
    • T. Nakagohri, T. Asano, H. Kinoshita, T. Kenmochi, T. Urashima, F. Miura, T. Ochiai: Aggressive surgical resection for hilar-invasive and peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma . In: World J Surg , 27, 3, 2003, pp. 289-293, PMID 12607053
    • S. Weber, W. Jarnagin, D. Klimstra, R. DeMatteo, Y. Fong, L. Blumgart: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: resectability, recurrence pattern, and outcomes . In: J Am Coll Surg , 193, 4, 2001, pp. 384-391, PMID 11584966
  65. The five-year survival rate of perihilar bile duct carcinoma was examined in the following studies:
    • E. Burke, W. Jarnagin, S. Hochwald, P. Pisters, Y. Fong, L. Blumgart: Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system . In: Ann Surg , 228, 3, 1998, pp. 385-394, PMID 9742921
    • J. Tsao, Y. Nimura, J. Kamiya, N. Hayakawa, S. Kondo, M. Nagino, M. Miyachi, M. Kanai, K. Uesaka, K. Oda, R. Rossi, J. Braasch, J. Dugan: Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of an American and a Japanese experience . In: Ann Surg , 232, 2, 2000, pp. 166-174, PMID 10903592
    • R. Chamberlain, L. Blumgart: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a review and commentary . In: Ann Surg Oncol , 7, 1, pp. 55-66, PMID 10674450
    • W. Washburn, W. Lewis, R. Jenkins: Aggressive surgical resection for cholangiocarcinoma . In: Arch Surg , 130, 3, 1995, pp. 270-276, PMID 7534059
    • M. Nagino, Y. Nimura, J. Kamiya, M. Kanai, K. Uesaka, N. Hayakawa, H. Yamamoto, S. Kondo, H. Nishio: Segmental liver resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma . In: Hepatogastroenterology , 45, 19, pp. 7-13, PMID 9496478
    • D. Rea, M. Munoz-Juarez, M. Farnell, J. Donohue, F. Que, B. Crownhart, D. Larson, D. Nagorney: Major hepatic resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of 46 patients . In: Arch Surg , 139, 5, 2004, pp. 514-523, discussion pp. 523-525, PMID 15136352
    • B. Launois, R. Reding, G. Lebeau, J. Buard: Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: French experience in a collective survey of 552 extrahepatic bile duct cancers . In: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg , 7, 2, 2000, pp. 128-134, PMID 10982604
  66. M. Kaya, P. de Groen, P. Angulo, D. Nagorney, L. Gunderson, G. Gores, M. Haddock, K. Lindor: Treatment of cholangiocarcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis: the Mayo Clinic experience . In: Am J Gastroenterol , 96, 4, 2001, pp. 1164-1169, PMID 11316165
  67. A. Nakeeb, K. Tran, M. Black, B. Erickson, P. Ritch, E. Quebbeman, S. Wilson, M. Demeure, W. Rilling, K. Dua, H. Pitt: Improved survival in resected biliary malignancies . In: Surgery , 132, 4, 2002, pp. 555-563, discussion pp. 563-564, PMID 12407338
  68. C. Su, S. Tsay, C. Wu, Y. Shyr, K. King, C. Lee, W. Lui, T. Liu, F. P'eng: Factors influencing postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma . In: Ann Surg , 223, 4, 1996, pp. 384-94, PMID 8633917
  69. JK Heimbach, GJ Gores, MG Haddock et al .: Predictors of disease recurrence following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and liver transplantation for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. in: transplant. 2006 Dec 27; 82 (12): pp. 1703-1707.
  70. T. Todoroki, K. Ohara, T. Kawamoto, N. Koike, S. Yoshida, H. Kashiwagi, M. Otsuka, K. Fukao: Benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical resection of locally advanced main hepatic duct carcinoma . In: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys , 46, 3, 1994, pp. 581-587, PMID 10701737
  71. M. Alden, M. Mohiuddin: The impact of radiation dose in combined external beam and intraluminal Ir-192 brachytherapy for bile duct cancer . In: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys , 28, 4, 1994, pp. 945-951, PMID 8138448
  72. D. González González, D. Gouma, E. Rauws, T. van Gulik, A. Bosma, C. Koedooder: Role of radiotherapy, in particular intraluminal brachytherapy, in the treatment of proximal bile duct carcinoma . In: Ann Oncol , 10, Suppl 4, pp. 215-220, PMID 10436826
  73. H. Pitt, A. Nakeeb, R. Abrams, J. Coleman, S. Piantadosi, C. Yeo, K. Lillemore, J. Cameron: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve survival Ann Surg 221, 6, 1995, pp. 788-797, discussion pp. 797-798, PMID 7794082
  74. T. Takada, H. Amano, H. Yasuda, Y. Nimura, T. Matsushiro, H. Kato, T. Nagakawa, T. Nakayama: Is postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy useful for gallbladder carcinoma? A phase III multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with resected pancreaticobiliary carcinoma . In: Cancer , 95, 8, 2002, pp. 1685-1695, PMID 12365016
  75. a b National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines on evaluation and treatment of hepatobiliary malignancies (PDF) accessed on March 13, 2007.
  76. J. Vauthey, L. Blumgart (1994): Recent advances in the management of cholangiocarcinomas. Semin. Liver Dis. 14, 2, pp. 109-114, PMID 8047893
  77. B. Glimelius, K. Hoffman, P. Sjödén, G. Jacobsson, H. Sellström, L. Enander, T. Linnaeus, C. Svensson: Chemotherapy Improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer . In: Ann Oncol , 7, 6, 1996, pp. 593-600, PMID 8879373
  78. C. Choi, I. Choi, J. Seo, B. Kim, J. Kim, C. Kim, S. Um, J. Kim, Y. Kim: Effects of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of pancreatic- biliary tract adenocarcinomas . In: Am J Clin Oncol , 234, 2000, pp. 425-428, PMID 10955877
  79. J. Park, S. Oh, S. Kim, H. Kwon, J. Kim, H. Jin-Kim, Y. Kim: Single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers: a phase II study . In: Jpn J Clin Oncol , 35, 2, 2005, pp. 68-73, PMID 15709089
  80. ^ F. Giuliani, V. Gebbia, E. Maiello, N. Borsellino, E. Bajardi, G. Colucci: Gemcitabine and cisplatin for inoperable and / or metastatic biliary tree carcinomas: a multicenter phase II study of the Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridional (GOIM) . In: Ann Oncol , 17 Suppl 7 pp. Vii73-vii77, PMID 16760299
  81. P. Bhargava, C. Jani, D. Savarese, J. O'Donnell, K. Stuart, C. Rocha Lima: Gemcitabine and irinotecan in locally advanced or metastatic biliary cancer: preliminary report . In: Oncology (Williston Park) , 17, 9 Suppl 8, 2003, pp. 23-26, PMID 14569844
  82. J. Knox, D. Hedley, A. Oza, R. Feld, L. Siu, E. Chen, M. Nematollahi, G. Pond, J. Zhang, M. Moore: Combining gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with advanced biliary cancer: a phase II trial . In: J Clin Oncol , 23, 10, 2005, pp. 2332-2338, PMID 15800324
  83. RR Plentz, A. Vogel: treatment of metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncologist 2015; 10: 1064-1068. doi: 10.1007 / s00761-015-2932-2
  84. ^ P. Philip, M. Mahoney, C. Allmer, J. Thomas, H. Pitot, G. Kim, R. Donehower, T. Fitch, J. Picus, C. Erlichman: Phase II study of erlotinib in patients with advanced biliary cancer . In: J Clin Oncol , 24, 19, 2006, pp. 3069-3074, PMID 16809731
  85. M. Ortner, K. Caca, F. Berr, J. Liebetruth, U. Mansmann, D. Huster, W. Voderholzer, G. Schachschal, J. Mössner, H. Lochs: Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study . In: Gastroenterology , 125, 5, 2003, pp. 1355-1363, PMID 14598251
  86. T. Zoepf, R. Jakobs, J. Arnold, D. Apel, J. Riemann: Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy . In: Am J Gastroenterol , 100, 11, 2005, pp. 2426-2430, PMID 16279895
This version was added to the list of articles worth reading on August 2, 2008 .