DNA extraction

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A DNA extraction describes the extraction of DNA from cells . DNA extraction is a method of DNA purification .

Cell disruption

An organism's DNA can be isolated in a number of ways. Most of the methods begin with a concentration of the cells by centrifugation and a suitable cell disruption of the cell precipitate for the respective group . So z. B. in plant , fungal or bacterial cells, which in comparison to animal cells, mycoplasmas and some archaea species have a cell wall in addition to the cell membrane , usually additional enzymatic (e.g. lysozyme in bacteria or proteinase K for proteolysis ) or mechanical crushing steps ( blender ) respectively. In plasmid preparation from bacteria, alkaline lysis is often used as the chemical cell disruption . After cell disruption, the homogenate is usually clarified by filtration or centrifugation. DNA from mitochondria or chloroplasts can be separated from the DNA of the cell nucleus by cell fractionation . Hirt extraction is used to isolate extrachromosomal DNA such as viral DNA. An RNase digestion can be performed to remove the RNA .

Extractions

DNA is a polar biopolymer with a relatively high molar mass , which is why it precipitates in a non-polar environment due to the reduced hydrate shell and the resulting reduction in its solubility . In addition, because of the deoxyribose phosphate backbone with negative charges proportional to the chain length, DNA is insoluble in acidic, aqueous solutions. At low pH values , the phosphate groups and thus the negative charges of the DNA are saturated with protons , which also reduces the size of the hydration shell.

Most DNA extractions are based on two different methods after cell disruption , two- phase extraction or precipitation , the latter possibly with additional selective adsorption onto a DNA-binding matrix. The extraction processes are also sometimes combined with one another. The following methods are usually followed by a final ethanol precipitation.

Two-phase extraction

RNA extraction by two-phase extraction and ethanol precipitation.

The two-phase extraction is based on the different distribution of biomolecules in an organic phase, an aqueous phase and the interphase in between. These include B. the phenol-chloroform extraction , the phenol-chloroform- isoamyl alcohol extraction and the Trizol extraction. During extraction according to Sacchi (with Trizol , TRI Reagent , Trisure , STAT-60 , RNAzol or DNAzol as trade names), the DNA collects in the interphase, the RNA and the carbohydrates in the aqueous phase and the proteins and the lipids in the organic Phase. Here that provides chaotrope guanidine thiocyanate for denaturation , all proteins including DNase , RNase and peptidases . The interphase is transferred to a new vessel with a pipette . The DNA contained is then subjected to ethanol or isopropanol precipitation .

Adsorption on silica gel

Commercially available silica gel column, upside down

In this method the DNA is precipitated in slightly acidic environment to a matrix of silica gel ( English silica gel ), glass fiber filters or diethyl aminoethyl-dextran ( DEAE-dextran ) adsorbed . Adsorption takes place under DNA-precipitating buffer conditions (with alcohols and a slightly acidic pH value) with silica and glass fiber via polar interactions, with DEAE-dextran via ionic interactions. The sample can be applied several times to the matrix in order to increase the yield . The matrix contained in the chromatography column is then freed from the contaminating DNA-binding proteins using chaotropes. The chaotropic salts denature the proteins and keep them in solution while the DNA remains bound to the matrix. In a chemical gel extraction , i.e. the extraction of DNA from agarose gels by dissolving the gel, sodium iodide is often used as an alternative chaotrope . The DNA is eluted from the matrix by adding water or slightly basic Tris buffer with EDTA ( TE buffer ). An optional second elution increases the absolute amount of DNA extracted at the expense of the concentration. After the DNA has been eluted from the silica gel matrix, ethanol is usually also precipitated.

Lysis by boiling

In boiling lysis , bacterial cells are boiled for 45 seconds a short time after the addition of lysozyme and Triton X-100 , after which the clumped cell debris (with the majority of the chromosomal DNA) is removed with a sterile toothpick . After centrifugation, the now cleared supernatant is subjected to ethanol precipitation. This method is mostly used to isolate plasmids from bacteria, since the chromosomal DNA clumps together with other components. This method is suitable for a higher number of samples, but produces a comparatively somewhat lower yield and purity, since plasmids are partially removed with the clumped components and the proteins are not removed selectively.

CTAB precipitation

RNA and DNA form insoluble complexes with cationic surfactants . CTAB precipitation uses the extraction of DNA with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), which is then combined with chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. It is mostly used on plant cells. According to a crushing in a mortar the cell disruption is carried out by addition of CTAB, polyvinyl pyrrolidone and mercaptoethanol in a TRIS - buffer at a pH value of 8. Subsequently, usually a chloroform-isoamyl alcohol or chloroform- octanol extraction, in which the DNA due to of the basic pH remains in the aqueous phase. The aqueous phase is subjected to ethanol precipitation in a new reaction vessel. The extraction with Catrimox-14 , a method of RNA extraction, is carried out analogously .

Ethanol precipitation

Ethanol precipitation of chromosomal DNA from zucchini

In ethanol or isopropanol precipitation, the DNA is precipitated under slightly acidic conditions (pH 5.2) in a less polar (alcoholic) environment due to the reduction in solubility . Water has a dielectric constant of 80.1 at 25 ° C, while that of ethanol is around 24.3. The addition of ethanol removes water from the DNA, which reduces its solubility. The low pH value in the case of ethanol precipitation is achieved by adding an acidic potassium acetate or sodium acetate solution. This keeps the otherwise negatively charged DNA in a partially protonated, partially saturated and uncharged state with potassium or sodium ions, whereby the solubility is further reduced. In the case of an alternative use of ammonium acetate , the proteins can be precipitated separately before the addition of ethanol and separated off by an additional centrifugation step, which allows plasmid DNA to be extracted without using silica.

After adding the ethanol and the potassium acetate solution, the test batch is for 15 min. centrifuged at 10,000 g. At low DNA concentrations or short DNA fragments below 100 bases or base pairs, the precipitation period can be extended to several hours and polymers such as. B. glycogen , tRNA or linear polyacrylamide can be added. The supernatant is removed after centrifugation and discarded. In most cases, 70% ethanol is then added as a washing solution, centrifuged again and the supernatant discarded again. The precipitate is dried and then dissolved in TE buffer. Since the ethanol precipitation separates relatively uncleanly and some proteins, polysaccharides and RNA precipitate at the same time with the DNA, it is usually only used as a final purification step and several times in succession on the same sample.

Endotoxin Removal

In some cases, contaminating endotoxins must be removed from the DNA , e.g. B. to avoid activation of TLR-4 when using purified plasmid DNA in TLR4-positive organisms. For this purpose, two-phase cloud point extraction with Triton-X114 or chromatography are used, both methods in succession or in combination.

The cloud point extraction is based on the phase separation of a one percent (m / V) Triton-X114 solution above 22 ° C or after the addition of salts and sodium lauryl sulfate .

The material used in a chromatography column for endotoxin removal is, inter alia, hydroxyapatite , polystyrene , Dowex 1-X2 (strongly basic anion exchanger ), activated carbon or polymyxin-B -modified column material.

quantification

The easiest way to determine the amount of purified DNA is by photometry . On the other hand, if the amount of a certain DNA sequence in a mixture of DNA sequences is to be determined, QPCR is usually used. In photometry, an extinction E of 1 of a purified DNA solution for double-stranded DNA and a wavelength of 260 nm corresponds to a concentration of 50 micrograms per milliliter, for single-stranded RNA this corresponds to 40 micrograms per milliliter and for single-stranded DNA 33 micrograms per milliliter. In the case of single-stranded oligonucleotides , the corresponding concentration can be calculated from the number of different nucleic bases ( n A for the number of adenines ):

The extinction coefficient can be calculated for single-stranded and double-stranded DNA using the nearest-neighbor heuristic . An extinction coefficient allows the concentration to be determined without a standard series according to Lambert-Beer’s law . The extinction coefficient ϵ at a wavelength of 260 nm is calculated as follows:

purity

The ratio of the absorbance at 260 nm and the absorbance at 280 nm is used as an indicator of the purity of the DNA. Proteins absorb relatively strongly at 280 nm due to the amino acids they contain phenylalanine , tyrosine and tryptophan . Pure DNA has an absorbance ratio of two, whereas a pure protein sample is 0.57. However, since the extinction coefficient of proteins is more than a power of ten lower than that of DNA, a ratio of 1.9 means a protein content of 40% and a ratio of 1.8 means a protein content of 60%. A calculation of the DNA concentration based on the extinction coefficient is therefore only useful for a ratio of 2. One way of calculating the concentration, including the purity, is based on the following formula, with R as the ratio of the extinctions at 260 nm and 280 nm:

Inserting the extinction coefficients results in:

Where technically available, it makes more sense to use the ratio of the absorbances at 260 nm and 234 nm as a purity indicator. At 234 nm, DNA absorbs little compared to 280 nm, but the peptide bond of the proteins is relatively strong. Since the extinction coefficients for protein at 234 nm are only 1.5 to 1.8 times lower than those of DNA, this measure is more sensitive to protein contamination. Similarly, the concentration can be calculated taking the purity into account using the following formula:

history

From 1951 E. Volkin and CE Carter first used the chaotrope guanidinium chloride for denaturing proteins with subsequent chloroform extraction of the RNA and ethanol precipitation, from 1963 it was used by R. Cox and H. Arnstein for RNA extraction. The two-phase extraction, on which the three current two-phase extraction methods are based, comes from an extraction method with methanol and chloroform, which was developed in 1959 for lipids. Phenol was first used in 1953 by W. Grassman and G. Deffner for denaturing protein extraction, from 1956 phenol was used by K. Kirby for RNA extraction. The use of the chaotrope guanidinium thiocyanate was first mentioned in 1977 by A. Ullrich and described in 1979 by J. Chirgwin. From 1979, H. Birnboim and J. Doly combined the alkaline lysis of bacterial cells with DNA extraction. In 1981 J. Feramisco described an RNA extraction with guanidinium thiocyanate and hot phenol. In 1985, J. Zeugin and J. Hartley published the current variant of ethanol precipitation. In 1987, Piotr Chomczynski and Nicoletta Sacchi first used guanidinium thiocyanate in combination with two-phase extraction for denaturing and solubilizing proteins at acidic pH values ​​during extraction and precipitation of the DNA. In 1990 the selective adsorption of DNA on silica gel was published by R. Boom.

literature

Individual evidence

  1. B. Hirt: Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. In: Journal of molecular biology. Volume 26, Number 2, June 1967, pp. 365-369, PMID 4291934 .
  2. a b P. Chomczynski, N. Sacchi: Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. In: Anal Biochem . (1987) 162 (1): 156-9. PMID 2440339 .
  3. a b H. C. Birnboim, J. Doly: A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. In: Nucleic Acids Res. (1979), Vol. 7 (6), pp. 1513-23. PMID 388356 ; PMC 342324 (free full text).
  4. MA Marko, R. Chipperfield, HC Birnboim: A procedure for the large-scale isolation of highly purified plasmid DNA using alkaline extraction and binding to glass powder. In: Anal Biochem. (1982) Vol. 121 (2), pp. 382-7. PMID 6179438 .
  5. R. Boom, CJ Sol, MM Salimans, CL Jansen, PM Wertheim-van Dillen, J. van der Noordaa: Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. In: Journal of clinical microbiology. Volume 28, Number 3, March 1990, pp. 495-503, ISSN  0095-1137 . PMID 1691208 . PMC 269651 (free full text).
  6. a b R. Boom, C. Sol, M. Beld, J. Weel, J. Goudsmit, P. Wertheim-van Dillen: Improved silica-guanidinium thiocyanate DNA isolation procedure based on selective binding of bovine alpha-casein to silica particles. In: Journal of clinical microbiology. Volume 37, Number 3, March 1999, pp. 615-619, ISSN  0095-1137 . PMID 9986822 . PMC 84491 (free full text).
  7. M. Beld, C. Sol, J. Goudsmit, R. Boom: Fractionation of nucleic acids into single-stranded and double-stranded forms. In: Nucleic acids research. Volume 24, Number 13, July 1996, pp. 2618-2619, ISSN  0305-1048 . PMID 8692706 . PMC 145977 (free full text).
  8. TA Borodina, H. Lehrach , AV Soldatov: DNA purification on homemade silica spin columns. In: Anal Biochem. (2003), Volume 321 (1), pp. 135-7. PMID 12963065 .
  9. B. Vogelstein, D. Gillespie: Preparative and analytical purification of DNA from agarose. In: Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (1979), vol. 76 (2), pp. 615-9. PMID 284385 ; PMC 382999 (free full text).
  10. DS Holmes, MA Quigley: A rapid boiling method for the preparation of bacterial plasmids. In: Anal Biochem. (1981) Vol. 114, No. 1, pp. 193-197. PMID 6269464 .
  11. ^ LV Andreou: Isolation of plasmid DNA from bacteria. In: Methods Enzymol. (2013), Volume 529, pp. 135-142. doi : 10.1016 / B978-0-12-418687-3.00010-0 . PMID 24011041 .
  12. SK DUTTA, AS JONES, M. STACEY: The separation of desoxypentosenucleic acids and pentosenucleic acids. In: Biochimica et Biophysica Acta . Volume 10, Number 4, April 1953, pp. 613-622, PMID 13059025 .
  13. JC Murphy, MA Winters, SL Sagar: Large-scale, nonchromatographic purification of plasmid DNA. In: Methods Mol Med. (2006), Volume 127, pp. 351-62. PMID 16988465 .
  14. a b J. A. Zeugin, JL Hartley: Ethanol Precipitation of DNA. In: Focus (1985), Volume 7 (4). PDF .
  15. J. Crouse, D. Amorese: Ethanol Precipitation: Ammonium Acetate as an Alternative to Sodium Acetate. In: Focus (1987), Volume 9 (2), pp. 3-5. PDF ( Memento of the original from November 22, 2009 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was automatically inserted and not yet checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. . @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / www.invitrogen.com
  16. Pérola O. Magalhães, André M. Lopes, Priscila G. Mazzola, Carlota Rangel-Yagui, Thereza CV Penna, Adalberto Pessoa Jr .: Methods of Endotoxin Removal from Biological Preparations: a Review. In: J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. (2007), Volume 10, Number 3, pp. 388-404. PDF
  17. US patent US20130004562.
  18. A. Rozkov, B. Larsson, S. Gillström, R. Björnestedt, SR Schmidt: Large-scale production of endotoxin-free plasmids for transient expression in mammalian cell culture. In: Biotechnology and bioengineering. Volume 99, Number 3, February 2008, pp. 557-566, ISSN  1097-0290 . doi : 10.1002 / bit.21603 . PMID 17680665 .
  19. W. Pi, C. Sun, Z. Song, L. Ma, S. Liu, D. Bai, Y. Cai, S. Liu: [Purification of plasmid DNA using anion-exchange chromatography and removal of endotoxin]. In: Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography / Zhongguo hua xue hui. Volume 25, Number 6, November 2007, pp. 809-813, ISSN  1000-8713 . PMID 18257294 .
  20. Patent WO 95/21177, US Patent US5747663 A, US6953686, European Patent EP211968.
  21. ^ R. Ma, J. Zhao, HC Du, S. Tian, ​​LW Li: Removing endotoxin from plasmid samples by Triton X-114 isothermal extraction. In: Analytical biochemistry. Volume 424, Number 2, May 2012, pp. 124-126, ISSN  1096-0309 . doi : 10.1016 / year from 2012.02.015 . PMID 22370278 .
  22. SK Maitra, TT Yoshikawa, LB Guze, MC Schotz: Properties of binding of Escherichia coli endotoxin to various matrices. In: Journal of clinical microbiology. Volume 13, Number 1, January 1981, pp. 49-53, ISSN  0095-1137 . PMID 7007429 . PMC 273719 (free full text).
  23. M. Cotten, A. Baker, M. Saltik, E. Wagner, M. Buschle: Lipopolysaccharide is a frequent contaminant of plasmid DNA preparations and can be toxic to primary human cells in the presence of adenovirus. In: Gene therapy. Volume 1, Number 4, July 1994, pp. 239-246, ISSN  0969-7128 . PMID 7584087 .
  24. a b c Wolfgang Hennig: Genetics. Springer-Verlag, 2013, ISBN 978-3-662-07430-5 ( limited preview in Google book search).
  25. ^ Frank H. Stephenson: Calculations for Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Academic Press, 2016, ISBN 978-0-128-02598-7 , p. 111.
  26. AV Tataurov, Y. You, R. Owczarzy: Predicting ultraviolet spectrum of single stranded and double stranded deoxyribonucleic acids. In: Biophysical chemistry. Volume 133, Number 1-3, March 2008, pp. 66-70, doi : 10.1016 / j.bpc.2007.12.004 , PMID 18201813 .
  27. Patrick Couvreur: Pharmaceutical Aspects of Oligonucleotides. CRC Press, 2003, ISBN 978-0-203-30566-9 , p. 60.
  28. a b c d e f Stefan Surzycki: Basic Techniques in Molecular Biology. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, ISBN 978-3-642-56968-5 , p. 24.
  29. JA Glasel: Validity of nucleic acid purities monitored by 260nm / 280nm absorbance ratios. In: BioTechniques. Volume 18, Number 1, January 1995, pp. 62-63, PMID 7702855 .
  30. VF calf, RW Bernlohr: A new spectrophotometric assay for protein in cell extracts. In: Analytical biochemistry. Volume 82, Number 2, October 1977, pp. 362-371, PMID 20815 .
  31. ^ E. Volkin, CE Carter: The Preparation and Properties of Mammalian Ribonucleic Acids . Un J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1951), Volume 73, Issue 4, pp. 1516-1519.
  32. ^ RA Cox, HRV Arnstein: The isolation, characterization and acid-base properties of ribonucleic acid from rabbit-reticulocyte ribosomes . In: J. Biochem. (1963), Vol. 89, pp. 574-584, PMID 14101978 , PMC 1202465 (free full text).
  33. ^ EG Bligh, WJ Dyer: A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. In: Can J Biochem Physiol. (1959) Aug; 37 (8): 911-7. PMID 13671378 .
  34. ^ W. Grassman, G. Deffner: Distribution chromatographic behavior of proteins and peptides in phenol-containing solvents . In: Hoppe Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. (1953), Vol. 293, pp. 89-98.
  35. KS Kirby: A New Method for the Isolation of Ribonucleic Acids from Mammalian Tissues . In: Biochem. J. (1956), Vol. 64, pp. 405-408, PMID 13373784 , PMC 1199750 (free full text).
  36. A. Ullrich, J. Shine, J. Chirgwin, R. Pictet, E. Tischer, WJ Rutter, HM Goodman: Rat insulin genes: construction of plasmids containing the coding sequences. In: Science. Volume 196, Number 4296, June 1977, pp. 1313-1319, PMID 325648 .
  37. JM Chirgwin, AE Przybyla, RJ MacDonald, WJ Rutter: Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. In: Biochemistry. Volume 18, Number 24, November 1979, pp. 5294-5299, PMID 518835 .
  38. JR Feramisco, JE Smart, K. Burridge, DM Helfman, GP Thomas: Co-existence of vinculin and a vinculin-like protein of higher molecular weight in smooth muscle. In: The Journal of biological chemistry. Volume 257, Number 18, September 1982, pp. 11024-11031, PMID 6809764 .