James II of England: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jklin (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by 88.73.37.80 to last version by Tivedshambo
Dimwight2 (talk | contribs)
m Wordsmithing #article-full-source-editor
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|King of England, Scotland and Ireland from 1685 to 1688}}
{| align=right
{{Featured article}}
| [[Image:James_II_of_England.jpg|thumb|right|200px|'''James VII and II''' <br><small>[[King of England]], [[King of Scots]], and [[King of Ireland]]</small>]]
{{EngvarB|date=May 2014}}
|-
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2023}}
|{{House of Stuart|arms=[[Image:J1&2,C1&2 Arms.png|150px]]}}
{{Infobox royalty
|}
| name = James VII and II
| image = James II by Peter Lely.jpg
| caption = Portrait by [[Peter Lely]]
| succession = [[King of England]], [[List of Scottish monarchs|Scotland]] and [[List of Irish monarchs|Ireland]]
| moretext = ([[Style of the British sovereign#Styles of English and Scottish sovereigns|more...]])
| reign = 6 February 1685 – {{avoid wrap|23 December 1688}}
| coronation = 23 April 1685
| predecessor = [[Charles II of England|Charles II]]
| successor = [[Mary II]] and [[William III & II]]
| suc-type = Successors
| birth_date = 14 October 1633<br />([[Old Style and New Style dates|N.S.]]: 24 October 1633)
| birth_place = [[St James's Palace]], [[Westminster]], England
| death_date = 16 September 1701 (aged 67){{efn|name=death}} (N.S.)
| death_place = [[Château de Saint-Germain-en-Laye]], France
| spouses = <!-- Do not change "spouses" to "consorts" because Anne Hyde was never James's royal consort. -->
{{plainlist|
*{{marriage|[[Anne Hyde]]|1660|1671|end=died}}
*{{marriage|[[Mary of Modena]]|1673}}}}
| issue = {{plainlist|
* [[Charles Stuart, Duke of Cambridge (1660–1661)|Charles, Duke of Cambridge]]
* [[Mary II, Queen of England]]
* [[James Stuart, Duke of Cambridge|James, Duke of Cambridge]]
* [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain]]
* [[Charles Stuart, Duke of Kendal|Charles, Duke of Kendal]]
* [[Edgar Stuart, Duke of Cambridge|Edgar, Duke of Cambridge]]
* [[James Francis Edward Stuart|James, Prince of Wales]]
* [[Louisa Maria Stuart]]}}
''Illegitimate'': {{plainlist|
* [[Henrietta FitzJames]]
* [[James FitzJames, 1st Duke of Berwick]]
* [[Henry FitzJames]]
* [[Catherine Sheffield, Duchess of Buckingham and Normanby]]}}
| issue-link = #Issue
| issue-pipe = more...
| house = [[House of Stuart|Stuart]]
| father = [[Charles I of England]]
| mother = [[Henrietta Maria of France]]
| religion = {{plainlist|
*[[Anglicanism]] (1633–1668)
*[[Catholic Church in England|Catholicism]] (1668–1701)
}}
| burial_place = Church of the English Benedictines, Paris{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=240}}{{efn|name=burial}}
| signature = JamesIISig.svg
}}

'''James VII and II''' (14 October 1633 {{small|[[Old Style and New Style dates|O.S.]]}} – 16 September 1701){{Efn|name=death|An assertion found in many sources that James died on 6 September 1701 (17 September 1701 [[New Style]]) may result from a calculation done by an author of anonymous "An Exact Account of the Sickness and Death of the Late King James II, as also of the Proceedings at St. Germains thereupon, 1701, in a letter from an English gentleman in France to his friend in London".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Somers |first=John |authorlink=John Somers, 1st Baron Somers |title=Tracts |volume=XI 1809–1815 |pages=339–342}}</ref> The account reads: "And on Friday the 17th instant, about three in the afternoon, the king died, the day he always fasted in memory of our blessed Saviour's passion, the day he ever desired to die on, and the ninth hour, according to the Jewish account, when our Saviour was crucified." As 17 September 1701 [[New Style]] falls on a Saturday and the author insists that James died on Friday, "the day he ever desired to die on", so the author may have miscalculated the date, which later made it to various reference works.<ref>{{Cite book |title=English Historical Documents 1660–1714 |editor-first=Andrew |editor-last=Browning |publisher=Routledge |date=2001 |pages=136–138}}</ref>}} was [[King of England]] and [[Monarchy of Ireland|Ireland]] as '''James II''' and [[King of Scotland]] as '''James VII'''<ref name="ReferenceA">{{London Gazette|issue=2009|page=1|date=16 February 1684}}</ref> from the death of his elder brother, [[Charles II of England|Charles II]], on 6 February 1685. He was deposed in the [[Glorious Revolution]] of 1688. He was the last [[Catholic]] monarch of [[Kingdom of England|England]], [[Kingdom of Scotland|Scotland]], and [[Kingdom of Ireland|Ireland]]. His reign is now remembered primarily for conflicts over religious tolerance, but it also involved struggles over the principles of [[Absolute monarchy|absolutism]] and the [[divine right of kings]]. His deposition ended a century of political and civil strife in England by confirming the primacy of the [[English Parliament]] over the Crown.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Quinn|first=Stephen|title=The Glorious Revolution|url=https://eh.net/encyclopedia/the-glorious-revolution-of-1688/|website=Economic History Association EH.net|access-date=3 January 2019}}</ref>

James succeeded to the thrones of England, Ireland and Scotland following the death of his brother, with widespread support in all three countries, largely because the principles of eligibility based on divine right and birth were widely accepted.{{sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=6–7}} Tolerance of his personal Catholicism did not extend to tolerance of Catholicism in general, and the English and [[Parliament of Scotland|Scottish parliament]]s refused to pass his measures. His attempts then to impose them by decree met with opposition; some have argued that it was a political principle, rather than a religious one, that ultimately led to his removal.<ref>{{Cite book |editor-last1=Harris |editor-first1=Tim|editor-last2=Taylor |editor-first2=Stephen |title=The Final Crisis of the Stuart Monarchy |publisher=Boydell & Brewer |date=2015 |pages=144–159 |isbn=978-1-783-27044-6}}</ref>


In June 1688, two events turned dissent into a crisis. Firstly, the birth of James's son and heir [[James Francis Edward Stuart]] on 10 June raised the prospect of establishing a Catholic dynasty and excluding his [[Anglican]] daughter [[Mary II of England|Mary]] and her Protestant husband [[William III of England|William III, Prince of Orange]], who was also his nephew, from the line of succession. Secondly, the prosecution of the [[Seven Bishops]] for [[seditious libel]] was viewed as further evidence of an assault on the [[Church of England]], and their acquittal on 30 June destroyed his political authority in England. The ensuing anti-Catholic riots in England and Scotland led to a general feeling that only James's removal from the throne could prevent another civil war.{{sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=264–268}}
'''James II of England''' and '''VII of Scotland''' ([[14 October]] [[1633]]&ndash;[[16 September]] [[1701]]) became [[King of England]], [[King of Scots]], and [[King of Ireland]] on [[6 February]] [[1685]]. He was the last [[Roman Catholicism|Roman Catholic]] monarch to reign over the [[Kingdom of England]], [[Kingdom of Scotland]], and [[Kingdom of Ireland]]. Some of his subjects distrusted his religious policies and alleged [[despotism]], leading a group of them to depose him in the [[Glorious Revolution]]. He was replaced not by his Roman Catholic son, [[James Francis Edward Stuart|James Francis Edward]], but by his Protestant daughter and son-in-law, [[Mary II of England|Mary II]] and [[William III of England|William III]], who became joint rulers in 1689.
The belief that James&mdash;not William III or Mary II&mdash;was the legitimate ruler became known as [[Jacobitism]] (from ''Jacobus'' or ''Iacobus'', [[Latin]] for James). James did not himself attempt to return to the Throne, instead living the rest of his life under the protection of [[Louis XIV of France|King Louis XIV]] of [[France]]. His son James Francis Edward Stuart and his grandson [[Charles Edward Stuart]] (''Bonnie Prince Charlie'') attempted to restore the Jacobite line after James's death, but failed.


Leading members of the English political class [[Invitation to William|invited William of Orange]] to assume the English throne. When William landed in [[Brixham]] on 5 November 1688, James's army deserted and he went into exile in France on 23 December. In February 1689, a special [[Convention Parliament (1689)|Convention Parliament]] held that James had "vacated" the English throne and installed William and Mary as joint monarchs, thereby establishing the principle that [[sovereignty]] derived from Parliament, not birth. James landed in Ireland on 14 March 1689 in an attempt to recover his kingdoms, but, despite a simultaneous [[Jacobite rising of 1689|rising in Scotland]], in April a [[Convention of Estates (1689)|Scottish Convention]] followed that of England, both finding that James had "forfeited" the throne and offered it to William and Mary. After his defeat at the [[Battle of the Boyne]] in July 1690, James returned to France, where he spent the rest of his life in exile at [[Château de Saint-Germain-en-Laye|Saint-Germain]], protected by [[Louis XIV]]. While his contemporary opponents often portrayed him as an absolutist tyrant, some historians—beginning in the 20th century—have praised James for advocating religious tolerance. More recent scholarship has tended to take a middle ground between these views.


==Early life==
==Early life==
===Birth===
James, the second surviving son of [[Charles I of England|Charles I]] and [[Henrietta Maria of France]], was born at [[St. James's Palace]] in 1633 and created [[Duke of York]] in 1644. During the [[English Civil War]]&mdash;in which his father fought [[English Parliamentary]] and [[Puritanism|Puritan]] forces&mdash;he stayed in [[Oxford]], a Royalist stronghold. When the city surrendered in 1646, the Duke of York was confined in St James's Palace by parliamentary command. In 1648, he escaped from the Palace, whence he went to [[The Hague]] in disguise. When Charles I was executed by the rebels in 1649, monarchists proclaimed the Duke of York's elder brother, [[Charles II of England|Charles]], as King Charles II. Charles II was recognised by the [[Parliament of Scotland]] and the [[Parliament of Ireland]], and was crowned [[King of Scots]] at [[Scone, Perth and Kinross|Scone]], in Scotland, in 1651. He was, however, unable to secure the [[Crown of England]], and consequently fled to [[France]].
[[File:Charles I and James II.png|thumb|James with his father, [[Charles I of England|Charles I]], by Sir [[Peter Lely]], 1647]]
James, the second surviving son of King [[Charles I of England|Charles I]] and his wife, [[Henrietta Maria of France]], was born at [[St James's Palace]] in London on 14 October 1633.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=1}} Later that same year, he was baptized by [[William Laud]], the Anglican [[Archbishop of Canterbury]].{{Sfnp|Callow|2000|page=31}} He was educated by private tutors, along with his older brother, the future King [[Charles II of England|Charles II]], and the two sons of the [[George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham|Duke of Buckingham]], [[George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham|George]] and Francis Villiers.{{Sfnp|Callow|2000|page=34}} At the age of three, James was appointed [[Lord High Admiral of the United Kingdom|Lord High Admiral]]; the position was initially honorary, but became a substantive office after the [[Stuart Restoration|Restoration]], when James was an adult.<ref>{{Harvp|Miller|2000|page=10}}; {{Harvp|Callow|2000|page=101}}</ref> He was designated [[Duke of York]] at birth,<ref name="weir"/> invested with the [[Order of the Garter]] in 1642,{{Sfnp|Callow|2000|page=36}} and formally created Duke of York in January 1644.{{Sfnp|Callow|2000|page=31}}<ref name="weir"/>


===Wars of the Three Kingdoms===
Like his brother, the Duke of York sought refuge in France, serving in the French army under [[Henri de la Tour d'Auvergne, Vicomte de Turenne|Turenne]]. In 1656, when his brother, Charles, entered into an alliance with [[Spain]]&mdash;an enemy of France&mdash;he joined the Spanish army under [[Louis II de Bourbon, Prince de Condé|Louis, Prince of Condé]]. Both Turenne and Condé praised the Duke of York's abilities.
In August 1642, long running political disputes between Charles I and his opponents in [[Parliament of England|Parliament]] led to the [[First English Civil War]]. James and his brother Charles were present at the [[Battle of Edgehill]] in October, and narrowly escaped capture by Parliamentarian cavalry.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=3}} He spent most of the next four years in the [[Cavalier|Royalist]] wartime capital of [[Oxford]],{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=3}}{{sfnp|Callow|2000|page=42}} where he was made a [[Master of Arts]] by the University on 1 November 1642 and served as colonel of a volunteer regiment of foot.<ref>{{Cite book |editor-last1=White |editor-first1=Geoffrey H. |editor-last2=Lea |editor-first2=R.S. |title=[[The Complete Peerage]] |volume=XII |page=914 |chapter=Duke of York |ref={{sfnref|The Complete Peerage}}}}</ref> Following the [[Siege of Oxford|surrender of Oxford]] in June 1646, James was taken to London and held with his younger siblings [[Henry Stuart, Duke of Gloucester|Henry]], [[Elizabeth Stuart (daughter of Charles I)|Elizabeth]] and [[Henrietta of England|Henrietta]] in [[St James's Palace]].{{sfnp|Callow|2000|page=45}}


Frustrated by their inability to agree terms with Charles I, and with his brother Charles out of reach in [[France]], Parliament considered making James king. James was ordered by his father to escape, and, with the help of [[Joseph Bampfield]], in April 1648 successfully evaded his guards and crossed the North Sea to [[The Hague]].{{sfnp|Callow|2000|pages=48–50}} Following their victory in the 1648 [[Second English Civil War]], Parliament ordered the [[execution of Charles I]] in January 1649.{{sfnp|Royle|2004|page=517}} The [[Covenanter]] regime proclaimed Charles II King of Scotland, and after lengthy negotiations agreed to provide troops to restore him to the English throne. The [[Anglo-Scottish war (1650–1652)|invasion]] ended in defeat at [[Battle of Worcester|Worcester]] in September 1651. Although Charles managed to escape capture and to return to the exiled court in Paris, the Royalist cause appeared hopeless.{{sfn|Miller|2000|p=15}}
In 1660, with Oliver Cromwell dead, Charles II was restored to the English Throne, the Duke of York returning to England with him. Though he was the heir-presumptive, it seemed unlikely that the Duke of York would actually inherit the Crown, for Charles was still a young man capable of fathering children. In September 1660, the Duke of York (who was also created [[Duke of Albany]] in Scotland) married the [[Lady Anne Hyde]], the daughter of Charles's chief minister, [[Edward Hyde, 1st Earl of Clarendon]].


===Exile in France===
The Duke of York was appointed [[Lord High Admiral]] and commanded the [[Royal Navy]] during the [[Second Anglo-Dutch War|Second]] (1665&ndash;1667) and [[Third Anglo-Dutch War]] (1672&ndash;1674). Following its capture by the English in 1664, the Dutch territory of [[New Netherland]] was named New York in his honour, as was the town of [[New Amsterdam]]. [[Fort Orange]], 150 miles up the [[Hudson River|River Hudson]], was renamed [[Albany, New York|Albany]] in his honour as well. The Duke of York also headed the [[Royal African Company]], which participated in the [[slave trade]].
[[File:P7220019 DxO.jpg|left|thumb|[[Henri de La Tour d'Auvergne, Viscount of Turenne]], James's commander in France]]
James, like his brother, sought refuge in France, serving in the French army under [[Henri de La Tour d'Auvergne, Viscount of Turenne|Turenne]] against the [[Fronde]], and later against their Spanish allies.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=16–17}} In the French army James had his first true experience of battle, in which, according to one observer, he "ventures himself and chargeth gallantly where anything is to be done".{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=16–17}} Turenne's favour led to James being given command of a captured Irish regiment in December 1652, and being appointed Lieutenant-General in 1654.{{sfnp|The Complete Peerage|page=915}}


In the meantime, Charles was attempting to reclaim his throne, but France, although hosting the exiles, had allied itself with [[Oliver Cromwell]]. In 1656, Charles turned instead to Spain—an enemy of France—for support, and an alliance was made. In consequence, James was expelled from France and forced to leave Turenne's army.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=19–20}} James quarrelled with his brother over the diplomatic choice of Spain over France. Exiled and poor, there was little that either Charles or James could do about the wider political situation, and James ultimately travelled to [[Bruges]] and (along with his younger brother, [[Henry Stuart, Duke of Gloucester|Henry]]) joined the Spanish army under the [[Louis, Grand Condé|Prince of Condé]] in Flanders, where he was given command as Captain-General of six regiments of British volunteers{{sfnp|The Complete Peerage|page=915}} and fought against his former French comrades at the [[Battle of the Dunes (1658)|Battle of the Dunes]].{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=19–25}}
==Religion==
The Duke of York was admitted to the Roman Catholic Church in 1668 or 1669. His Protestant enemies in the [[Parliament of England]], led by [[Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury]], ensured the passage of the [[Test Act]]; under the Act, all civil and military officials were required to take an oath (in which they were required not only to disavow the doctrine of [[transubstantiation]], but also denounce certain practices of the Roman Catholic Church as "superstitious and idolatrous") and receive [[Eucharist|communion]] under the auspices of the [[Church of England]]. The Duke of York refused to perform both actions, instead choosing to relinquish the post of Lord High Admiral.


During his service in the Spanish army, James became friendly with two Irish Catholic brothers in the Royalist entourage, [[Peter Talbot (bishop)|Peter]] and [[Richard Talbot, 1st Earl of Tyrconnell|Richard Talbot]], and became somewhat estranged from his brother's Anglican advisers.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=22–23}} In 1659, the French and Spanish made peace by the [[Treaty of the Pyrenees]]. James, doubtful of his brother's chances of regaining the throne, considered taking a Spanish offer to be an admiral in their navy.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=24}} Ultimately, he declined the position; by the next year the situation in England had changed, and Charles II was proclaimed King.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=25}}
Charles II opposed the conversion, ordering that the Duke of York's children be raised as Protestants. Nevertheless, in 1673, he allowed York (whose first wife had died in 1671) to marry the Catholic [[Mary of Modena]]. Some English people distrusted Catholicism and regarded the new Duchess of York as an agent of the [[Pope]].


==Restoration==
In 1677, the Duke of York attempted to appease Protestants by allowing his daughter, Mary, to marry the Protestant Prince of Orange, [[William III of England|William III]] (who was also his nephew). Despite the concession, fears of a Catholic monarch persisted, intensified by the failed pregnancies of Charles II's wife, [[Catherine of Braganza]]. A defrocked Anglican clergyman, [[Titus Oates]], falsely spoke of a "[[Popish Plot]]" to kill Charles and put the Duke of York on the Throne. The fabricated plot caused a wave of anti-Catholic hysteria to sweep across the nation. The Duke of York wisely decided to leave England for [[Brussels]]. In 1680, the Duke of York was appointed Lord High Commissioner of Scotland and took up his residence at the [[Holyrood Palace|Palace of Holyroodhouse]] in [[Edinburgh]].


===First marriage===
In England, attempts were made by Lord Shaftesbury and others to exclude the Duke of York from the line of succession. Some even proposed that the Crown go to Charles II's illegitimate son, [[James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth]]. When, in 1679, the [[Exclusion Bill]] was in danger of passing, Charles II dissolved the English Parliament. (The Exclusion Bill crisis contributed to the development of the English two-party system; the [[Whig]]s were those who supported the Bill, whilst the [[Tory|Tories]] were those who opposed it.) Two further [[List of Parliaments of England|Parliaments]] were elected in 1680 and 1681, but were dissolved for the same reason.
[[File:James II and Anne Hyde by Sir Peter Lely.jpg|right|thumb|James and [[Anne Hyde]] in the 1660s, by Sir Peter Lely]]
After the collapse of the [[Commonwealth of England|Commonwealth]] in 1660, Charles II was restored to the thrones of England, Ireland and Scotland. Although James was the [[heir presumptive]], it seemed unlikely that he would inherit the Crown, as Charles was still a young man capable of fathering children.{{sfnp|Callow|2000|page=89}} On 31 December 1660, following his brother's restoration, James was created [[Duke of Albany]] in Scotland, to go along with his English title, Duke of York.<ref>{{Cite book |editor-link=George Edward Cokayne |editor-first=George Edward |editor-last=Cokayne |authorlink=Vicary Gibbs (St Albans MP) |first=Vicary |last=Gibbs |title=[[The Complete Peerage]] |volume=I |date=1910 |page=[https://archive.org/stream/completepeerageo01coka#page/83/mode/1up 83]}}</ref> Upon his return to England, James prompted an immediate controversy by announcing his engagement to [[Anne Hyde]], the daughter of Charles's chief minister, [[Edward Hyde, 1st Earl of Clarendon|Edward Hyde]].{{sfnp|Callow|2000|page=90}}


In 1659, while trying to seduce her, James promised he would marry Anne.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=44}} Anne became pregnant in 1660, but following the [[English Restoration|Restoration]] and James's return to power, no one at the royal court expected a prince to marry a [[commoner]], no matter what he had pledged beforehand.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=44–45}} Although nearly everyone, including Anne's father, urged the two not to marry, the couple married secretly, then went through an official marriage ceremony on 3 September 1660 in London.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=44–45}}
After the dissolution of the Parliament of 1681, no further Parliaments were called. Charles, whose popularity was very high at the time, allowed the Duke of York to return to England in 1682. The [[Rye House Plot]] of 1683, a Protestant conspiracy to assassinate both Charles and the Duke of York, failed utterly; it increased popular sympathy for the King and his brother. York once again found himself influential in government, becoming the leader of the Tory Party; his brother restored him to the office of Lord High Admiral in 1684.

The couple's first child, Charles, was born less than two months later, but died in infancy, as did five further children.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=44–45}} Only two daughters survived: [[Mary II of England|Mary]] (born 30 April 1662) and [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Anne]] (born 6 February 1665).{{sfnp|Waller|2002|pages=49–50}} [[Samuel Pepys]] wrote that James was fond of his children and his role as a father, and played with them "like an ordinary private father of a child", a contrast to the distant parenting common with royalty at the time.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Pepys |first=Samuel |authorlink=Samuel Pepys |title=[[Diary of Samuel Pepys|The Diary of Samuel Pepys]] |chapter-url=http://www.pepysdiary.com/diary/1664/09/12 |chapter=Monday 12 September 1664|date=12 September 2007 }}</ref>{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=46}}

James's wife was devoted to him and influenced many of his decisions.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=45–46}} Even so, he kept mistresses, including [[Arabella Churchill (royal mistress)|Arabella Churchill]] and [[Catherine Sedley, Countess of Dorchester|Catherine Sedley]], and was reputed to be "the most unguarded ogler of his time".{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=46}} Samuel Pepys recorded in his diary that James "did eye my wife mightily".{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=46}} James's taste in women was often maligned, with [[Gilbert Burnet]] famously remarking that James's mistresses must have been "given [to] him by his priests as a penance".{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=59}} Anne Hyde died in 1671.

===Military and political offices and royal slavery===
{{anchor|Settlement on Duke of York Act 1663|Post Office Revenues Act 1670}}
[[File:James II by John Riley.png|thumb|James in the 1660s by [[John Riley (painter)|John Riley]]]]
{{Infobox UK legislation
| short_title = Settlement on Duke of York Act 1663
| type = Act
| parliament = Parliament of England
| long_title = An Act for setling the Proffitts of the Post Office and Power of graunting Wyne Lycences on his Royall Highnes the Duke of Yorke and the Heires Males of his Body.
| year = 1663
| citation = [[15 Cha. 2]]. c. 14
| introduced_commons =
| introduced_lords =
| territorial_extent =
| royal_assent = 27 July 1663
| commencement = 18 February 1663
| expiry_date =
| repeal_date = 28 July 1863
| amends =
| replaces =
| amendments = Post Office Revenues Act 1670
| repealing_legislation = [[Statute Law Revision Act 1863]]
| related_legislation =
| status = repealed
| original_text = https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol5/pp495-498
| collapsed = yes
}}
{{Infobox UK legislation
| short_title = Post Office Revenues Act 1670
| type = Act
| parliament = Parliament of England
| long_title = An Act for explaining of a Proviso conteyned in an Act, entituled "An Act for settling the Profitts of ye Post-Office and Power of granteing Wine-Licences on His Royall Highnes ye Duke of Yorke and the Heyres Males of his Body."
| year = 1670
| citation = [[22 & 23 Cha. 2]]. c. 27
| introduced_commons =
| introduced_lords =
| territorial_extent =
| royal_assent = 22 April 1671
| commencement =
| expiry_date =
| repeal_date =
| amends = Settlement on Duke of York Act 1663
| replaces =
| amendments =
| repealing_legislation = [[Statute Law Revision Act 1863]]
| related_legislation =
| status = repealed
| legislation_history =
| theyworkforyou =
| millbankhansard =
| original_text =
| revised_text =
| use_new_UK-LEG =
| UK-LEG_title =
| collapsed = yes
}}
After the Restoration, James was confirmed as Lord High Admiral, an office that carried with it the subsidiary appointments of Governor of [[Portsmouth]] and [[Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports]].{{sfnp|Callow|2000|page=101}} Charles II also made his brother the Governor of the Royal Adventurers into Africa (later shortened to the [[Royal African Company]]) in October 1660, an office James retained until after the Glorious Revolution when he was forced to resign. When James commanded the [[Royal Navy]] during the [[Second Anglo-Dutch War]] (1665–1667) he immediately directed the fleet towards the capture of forts off the African coast that would facilitate English involvement in the [[Atlantic slave trade|slave trade]] (indeed English attacks on such forts occupied by the Dutch precipitated the war itself).<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Brewer |first=Holly |date=October 2017 |title=Slavery, Sovereignty, and 'Inheritable Blood': Reconsidering John Locke and the Origins of American Slavery |journal=American Historical Review |volume=122 |issue=4 |pages=1038–1078 |doi=10.1093/ahr/122.4.1038}}; {{harvp|Miller|2000|pages=43–44}}</ref> James remained Admiral of the Fleet during the [[Third Anglo-Dutch War]] (1672–1674), during which significant fighting also occurred off the African coast.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Davies |first=Kenneth Gordon |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KEYjnQEACAAJ |title=The Royal African Company |date=1999 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=9780415190770 |edition=reprint |page=62}}</ref> Following the [[raid on the Medway]] in 1667, James oversaw the survey and re-fortification of the southern coast.{{sfnp|Callow|2000|page=104}} The office of Lord High Admiral, combined with his revenue from post office and wine tariffs (positions granted him by Charles II upon his restoration), gave James enough money to keep a sizable court household.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=42}}

In 1664, Charles II granted American territory between the [[Delaware River|Delaware]] and [[Connecticut River|Connecticut]] rivers to James. Following its capture by the British, the former Dutch territory of [[New Netherland]] and its principal port, [[New Amsterdam]], were renamed the [[Province of New York|Province]] and [[City of New York]] in James's honour. James gave part of the colony to proprietors [[George Carteret]] and [[John Berkeley, 1st Baron Berkeley of Stratton|John Berkeley]]. [[Fort Orange]], {{convert|150|mi}} north on the [[Hudson River]], was renamed [[Albany, New York|Albany]] after James's Scottish title.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=44–45}} In 1683, James became the Governor of the [[Hudson's Bay Company]], but did not take an active role in its governance.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=44–45}}

In September 1666, Charles II put James in charge of firefighting operations during the [[Great Fire of London]], in the absence of action by Lord Mayor [[Thomas Bloodworth]]. This was not a political office, but his actions and leadership were noteworthy. "The Duke of York hath won the hearts of the people with his continual and indefatigable pains day and night in helping to quench the Fire", wrote a witness in a letter on 8 September.<ref>Spelling modernized for clarity; quoted by Adrian Tinniswood (2003). 80. ''By Permission of Heaven: The Story of the Great Fire of London''. London: Jonathan Cape.</ref>

In 1672, the Royal African Company received a new charter from Charles II. It set up forts and factories, maintained troops, and exercised martial law in West Africa in pursuit of trade in gold, silver and African slaves. In the 1680s, the RAC transported about 5,000 slaves a year to markets primarily in the English Caribbean across the Atlantic. Many were [[Human branding|branded]] on the chest with the letters "DY" for "Duke of York", the RAC's Governor.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://aaregistry.org/story/the-royal-african-company-rac-founded/ |title=The Royal African Company (RAC) is Founded |access-date=14 November 2022 |archive-date=14 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221114124703/https://aaregistry.org/story/the-royal-african-company-rac-founded/ |url-status=live}}</ref> As historian William Pettigrew writes, the RAC "shipped more enslaved African women, men, and children to the Americas than any other single institution during the entire period of the transatlantic slave trade".<ref>{{cite book |last=Pettigrew |first=William A. |title=Freedom's Debt. The Royal African Company and the Politics of the Atlantic Slave Trade, 1672–1752 |publisher=[[University of North Carolina Press]] |year=2013 |page=11 |isbn=978-1-4696-1182-2}}</ref>

===Conversion to Roman Catholicism and second marriage===
[[File:WLA vanda Wedding suit of James II 2.jpg|left|thumb|upright|Wedding suit of James II, 1673, in the [[Victoria and Albert Museum]]]]
James's time in France had exposed him to the beliefs and ceremonies of the Roman Catholic Church, and both he and his wife Anne became drawn to that faith.<ref>{{harvp|Miller|2000|pages=58–59}}; {{harvp|Callow|2000|pages=144–145}}</ref>{{efn|Anne "made the greatest single impact upon his thinking" and that she converted shortly after the Restoration, "almost certainly before her husband".{{sfnp|Callow|2000|page=144}}}} James took Catholic [[Eucharist]] in 1668 or 1669, although his conversion was kept secret for almost a decade as he continued to attend Anglican services until 1676.<ref>{{harvp|Callow|2000|pages=143–144}}; {{harvp|Waller|2002|page=135}}</ref> In spite of his conversion, James continued to associate primarily with Anglicans, including [[John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough|John Churchill]] and [[George Legge, 1st Baron Dartmouth|George Legge]], as well as [[Huguenots|French Protestants]] such as [[Louis de Duras, 2nd Earl of Feversham]].{{sfnp|Callow|2000|page=149}}

Growing fears of Roman Catholic influence at court led the English Parliament to introduce a new [[Test Act]] in 1673.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=69–71}} Under this Act, all civil and military officials were required to take an oath (in which they were required to disavow the doctrine of [[transubstantiation]] and denounce certain practices of the Roman Church as superstitious and idolatrous) and to receive the Eucharist under the auspices of the [[Church of England]].{{sfnp|Kenyon|1986|page=385}} James refused to perform either action, instead choosing to relinquish the post of Lord High Admiral. His conversion to Roman Catholicism was thereby made public.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=69–71}}

King Charles II opposed James's conversion, ordering that James's daughters, Mary and Anne, be raised in the Church of England.{{sfnp|Waller|2002|page=92}} Nevertheless, he allowed the widowed James to marry [[Mary of Modena]], a fifteen-year-old Italian princess.{{sfnp|Waller|2002|pages=16–17}} James and Mary were [[married by proxy]] in a Roman Catholic ceremony on 20 September 1673.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=73}} On 21 November, Mary arrived in England and [[Nathaniel Crew, 3rd Baron Crew|Nathaniel Crew]], [[Bishop of Oxford]], performed a brief Anglican service that did little more than recognise the marriage by proxy.{{sfnp|Turner|1948|pages=110–111}} Many British people, distrustful of Catholicism, regarded the new Duchess of York as an agent of the [[Papacy]].{{sfnp|Waller|2002|pages=30–31}} James was noted for his deep devotion, once remarking, "If occasion were, I hope God would give me his grace to suffer death for the true Catholic religion as well as banishment."{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=99}}

===Exclusion Crisis===
{{main|Exclusion Crisis}}
In 1677, King Charles II arranged for James's daughter Mary to marry the Protestant Prince [[William III of Orange]], son of Charles's and James's sister [[Mary, Princess Royal and Princess of Orange|Mary]]. James reluctantly acquiesced after his brother and nephew had agreed to the marriage.<ref>{{harvp|Miller|2000|page=84}}; {{harvp|Waller|2002|pages=94–97}}</ref>{{efn|According to Turner, James's reaction to the agreement was "The King shall be obeyed, and I would be glad if all his subjects would learn of me to obey him".{{sfnp|Turner|1948|page=132}}}} Despite the Protestant marriage, fears of a potential Catholic monarch persisted, intensified by the failure of Charles II and his wife, [[Catherine of Braganza]], to produce any children. A [[defrocked]] Anglican clergyman, [[Titus Oates]], spoke of a "[[Popish Plot]]" to kill Charles and to put the Duke of York on the throne.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=87}} The fabricated plot caused a wave of anti-Catholic hysteria to sweep across the nation.

[[File:James Scott, Duke of Monmouth and Buccleuch by Jan van Wyck cropped.jpg|thumb|The [[James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth|Duke of Monmouth]] was involved in plots against James.]]

In England, the [[Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury|Earl of Shaftesbury]], a former government minister and now a leading opponent of Catholicism, proposed an [[Exclusion Bill]] that would have excluded James from the line of succession.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=99–105}} Some members of Parliament even proposed to pass the crown to Charles's illegitimate son, [[James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth]].{{sfnp|Harris|2006|page=74}} In 1679, with the Exclusion Bill in danger of passing, Charles II dissolved Parliament.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=93–95}} Two further [[List of Parliaments of England|Parliaments]] were elected in 1680 and 1681, but were dissolved for the same reason.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=103–104}} The Exclusion Crisis contributed to the development of the English two-party system: the [[British Whig Party|Whigs]] were those who supported the Bill, while the [[Tories (British political party)|Tories]] were those who opposed it. Ultimately, the succession was not altered, but James was convinced to withdraw from all policy-making bodies and to accept a lesser role in his brother's government.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=90}}

On the orders of the King, James left England for [[Brussels]].{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=87–91}} In 1680, he was appointed [[Lord High Commissioner of Scotland]] and took up residence at the [[Holyrood Palace]] in Edinburgh to suppress an uprising and oversee the royal government.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=95}} James returned to England for a time when Charles was stricken ill and appeared to be near death.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=98–99}} The hysteria of the accusations eventually faded, but James's relations with many in the English Parliament, including the [[Thomas Osborne, 1st Duke of Leeds|Earl of Danby]], a former ally, were forever strained and a solid segment turned against him.<ref>{{harvp|Miller|2000|page=89}}; {{harvp|Callow|2000|pages=180–183}}</ref>

On 6 May 1682, James narrowly escaped the sinking of [[HMS Gloucester (1654)|HMS ''Gloucester'']], in which between 130 and 250 people perished.<ref>{{Cite news |date=10 June 2022 |title=Shipwreck The Gloucester hailed most important since Mary Rose |publisher=[[BBC News]] |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-norfolk-61734192}}</ref> James argued with the pilot about the navigation of the ship before it ran aground on a sandbank, and then delayed abandoning ship, which may have contributed to the death toll.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Thomas |first=Tobi |date=10 June 2022 |title=Wreck of Royal Navy warship sunk in 1682 identified off Norfolk coast |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jun/10/hms-gloucester-wreck-of-royal-navy-warship-sunk-in-1682-identified-off-norfolk-coast}}</ref>

===Return to favour===
In 1683, a plot was uncovered to assassinate Charles II and his brother and spark a [[Republicanism|republican]] revolution to re-establish a government of the [[Commonwealth of England|Cromwellian style]].{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=115–116}} The conspiracy, known as the [[Rye House Plot]], backfired upon its conspirators and provoked a wave of sympathy for the King and James.<ref>{{harvp|Miller|2000|page=116}}; {{harvp|Waller|2002|pages=142–143}}</ref> Several notable [[British Whig Party|Whigs]], including the [[Arthur Capell, 1st Earl of Essex|Earl of Essex]] and the Duke of Monmouth, were implicated.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=115–116}} Monmouth initially confessed to complicity in the plot and implicated fellow conspirators, but later recanted.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=115–116}} Essex committed suicide, and Monmouth, along with several others, was obliged to flee into exile in continental Europe.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=116–117}} Charles II reacted to the plot by increasing the repression of Whigs and [[English Dissenters|dissenters]].{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=115–116}} Taking advantage of James's rebounding popularity, Charles invited him back onto the [[Privy Council (United Kingdom)|Privy Council]] in 1684.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=117}} While some in the English Parliament remained wary of the possibility of a Roman Catholic king, the threat of excluding James from the throne had passed.


==Reign==
==Reign==
{| align="right"
|{{Infobox_UKkingstyles|
royal name=King James II of England|
dipstyle=[[Majesty|His Majesty]]|
offstyle=Your Majesty|
altstyle=Sir|}}
|-
|{{infobox_scotlandkingstyles|
royal name=King James VII of Scotland|
dipstyle=His Grace|
offstyle=Your Grace|
altstyle=Sir|}}
|}


===Accession to the throne===
[[Image:James_II_statue_1.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Statue of James II in [[Trafalgar Square]], London. This dates from 1686 and is attributed to the studio of [[Grinling Gibbons]]. It is one of only two known public statues of the monarch - the other resides at [[University College, Oxford]]. (January 2006)]]
[[File:The Coronation Procession of King James II and Queen Mary of Modena (c. 1685).jpg|thumb|Coronation procession of King James II and Queen Mary, 1685]]
{{main|Coronation of James II and VII and Mary}}
Charles II died on 6 February 1685 from [[apoplexy]], after supposedly converting to Catholicism on his deathbed.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=118–119}} Having no legitimate children, he was succeeded by his brother James, who reigned in England and Ireland as James II and in Scotland as James VII. There was little initial opposition to James's accession, and there were widespread reports of public rejoicing at the orderly succession.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=120–121}} He wished to proceed quickly to the coronation, and he and Mary were crowned at [[Westminster Abbey]] on 23 April 1685.{{sfnp|Harris|2006|page=45}}


The new [[List of Parliaments of England#Parliament of James II|Parliament]] that assembled in May 1685, which gained the name of "[[Loyal Parliament]]", was initially favourable to James, who had stated that most former exclusionists would be forgiven if they acquiesced to his rule.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=120–121}} Most of Charles's officers continued in office, the exceptions being the promotion of James's brothers-in-law, the earls of [[Henry Hyde, 2nd Earl of Clarendon|Clarendon]] and [[Laurence Hyde, 1st Earl of Rochester|Rochester]], and the demotion of [[George Savile, 1st Marquess of Halifax|Halifax]].{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=121}} Parliament granted James a generous life income, including all of the proceeds of [[tonnage and poundage]] and the customs duties.{{sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=44–45}} James worked harder as king than his brother had, but was less willing to compromise when his advisers disagreed with his policies.{{sfnp|Miller|2000|page=123}}
Charles died ''sine prole legitima'' (without legitimate offspring) in 1685, converting to Roman Catholicism on his deathbed. He was succeeded by his brother, who reigned in England and Ireland as James II, and in Scotland as James VII. James was crowned at [[Westminster Abbey]] on [[23 April]] 1685. At first, there was little overt opposition to the new Sovereign; many conservative Anglicans even supported him. The new Parliament which assembled in May 1685 seemed favourable to James, agreeing to grant him a large income.


===Two rebellions===
James, however, faced the [[Monmouth Rebellion]] (led by Charles II's illegitimate son, the Duke of Monmouth). [[James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth]] declared himself King on [[20 June]] 1685, but was afterwards defeated at the [[Battle of Sedgemoor]]. Monmouth was executed at the [[Tower of London]] soon afterwards.
{{main|Monmouth Rebellion|Argyll's Rising}}
[[File:James II (1685).jpg|thumb|James portrayed {{Circa|1685}} in his role as head of the army, wearing a general officer's state coat]]
Soon after becoming king, James faced a [[Monmouth Rebellion|rebellion in southern England]] led by his nephew, the Duke of Monmouth, and another [[Argyll's Rising|rebellion in Scotland]] led by [[Archibald Campbell, 9th Earl of Argyll]].<ref>{{Harvp |Miller|2000|pages=140–143}}; {{Harvp|Harris|2006|pages=73–86}}</ref> Monmouth and Argyll both began their expeditions from [[Dutch Republic|Holland]], where James's nephew and son-in-law, the Prince of Orange, had neglected to detain them or put a stop to their recruitment efforts.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=139–140}}


Argyll sailed to Scotland where he raised recruits, mainly from his own clan, the [[Clan Campbell|Campbells]].{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=75–76}} The rebellion was quickly crushed, and Argyll was captured at [[Inchinnan]] on 18 June 1685.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=75–76}} Having arrived with fewer than 300 men and unable to convince many more to flock to his standard, he never posed a credible threat to James.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|page=76}} Argyll was taken as a prisoner to Edinburgh. A new trial was not commenced because Argyll had previously been tried and sentenced to death. The King confirmed the earlier death sentence and ordered that it be carried out within three days of receiving the confirmation.
The king's judges&mdash;most notably, [[George Jeffreys, 1st Baron Jeffreys]] (the "Hanging Judge")&mdash;punished the rebels brutally. Judge Jeffreys' [[Bloody Assizes]] has led many historians to portray the king as a cruel ruler, but the assizes provoked little comment at the time, and were seen by many as an appropriate response to an armed rebellion. To protect himself from further rebellions, James sought to establish a large standing army. By putting Roman Catholics in charge of several regiments, the King was drawn into a conflict with Parliament. Parliament was prorogued in November 1685, never to meet again during James's reign.


Monmouth's rebellion was coordinated with Argyll's, but was more dangerous to James. Monmouth had proclaimed himself King at [[Lyme Regis]] on 11 June.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=82–85}} He attempted to raise recruits but was unable to gather enough rebels to defeat even James's small standing army.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=141}} Monmouth's soldiers attacked the King's army at night, in an attempt at surprise, but were defeated at the [[Battle of Sedgemoor]].{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=141}} The King's forces, led by Feversham and Churchill, quickly dispersed the ill-prepared rebels.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=141}} Monmouth was captured and later executed at the [[Tower of London]] on 15 July.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|page=88}} The King's judges—most notably, [[George Jeffreys, 1st Baron Jeffreys|George Jeffreys]]—condemned many of the rebels to [[Penal transportation|transportation]] and [[Indentured servant#Caribbean|indentured servitude]] in the [[West Indies]] in a series of trials that came to be known as the [[Bloody Assizes]].{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=141–142}} Around 250 of the rebels were executed.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|page=88}} While both rebellions were defeated easily, they hardened James's resolve against his enemies and increased his suspicion of the Dutch.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=142}}
Religious tension intensified in 1686. [[Paul Barillon]], the French ambassador to England, was perhaps right when he claimed that the king, "resolved not to rule precariously". In the collusive case of ''[[Godden v. Hales]]'', a panel of judges of the [[King's Bench|Court of King's Bench]] declared that the King could dispense with the religious restrictions imposed by the Test Acts. Taking advantage of the dispensing power, James controversially allowed Roman Catholics to occupy the highest offices of the Kingdom. He received at his court the [[papal nuncio]], [[Ferdinando d'Adda]], the first representative from Rome to London since the reign of [[Mary I of England|Mary I]]. James's [[Society of Jesus|Jesuit]] confessor, [[Father Edward Petre|Edward Petre]], was a particular object of Protestant ire. These policies caused the King to lose the support of many of his former allies, the Tories.


===Religious liberty and dispensing power===
James then ordered the suspension of [[Henry Compton]], the anti-Catholic [[Bishop of London]]; several other Anglicans in political office were dismissed. In the [[Declaration of Indulgence]] (1687), also known as the Declaration for Liberty of Conscience, he suspended laws punishing Roman Catholics and Protestant dissenters. (It is unclear if James issued the Declaration to gain the political support of the dissenters, or if he was truly committed to the principle of [[freedom of religion]].) James also dissolved Parliament in 1687, afterwards reforming the government so as to reduce the power of the nobility.
To protect himself from further rebellions, James sought safety by enlarging his [[standing army]].{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=142–143}} This alarmed his subjects, not only because of the trouble soldiers caused in the towns, but because it was against the English tradition to keep a professional army in peacetime.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=95–100}} Even more alarming to Parliament was James's use of his [[Royal Prerogative|dispensing power]] to allow Roman Catholics to command several regiments without having to take the oath mandated by the Test Act.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=142–143}} When even the previously supportive Parliament objected to these measures, James ordered Parliament [[Prorogation in the United Kingdom|prorogued]] in November 1685, never to meet again in his reign.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=146–147}} At the beginning of 1686, two papers were found in Charles II's strong box and his closet, in his own hand, stating the arguments for Catholicism over Protestantism. James published these papers with a declaration signed by his [[Royal sign-manual|sign manual]] and challenged the Archbishop of Canterbury and the whole Anglican episcopal bench to refute Charles's arguments: "Let me have a solid answer, and in a gentlemanlike style; and it may have the effect which you so much desire of bringing me over to your church." The Archbishop refused on the grounds of respect for the late king.{{Sfnp|Macaulay|1889|pages=349–350}}


[[File:Willem Wissing (1656-1687) (and studio) - Laurence Hyde (1641–1711), 1st Earl of Rochester, in Garter Robes - 609013 - National Trust.jpg|upright|thumb|[[Laurence Hyde, 1st Earl of Rochester]], once a supporter of James, turned against him by 1688.]]
The King also provoked opposition by his policies relating to the [[University of Oxford]]. He offended Anglicans by allowing Catholics to hold important positions in [[Christ Church, Oxford|Christ Church]] and [[University College, Oxford|University College]], two of Oxford's largest colleges. Even more unpopularly, he dismissed the Protestant Fellows of [[Magdalen College, Oxford|Magdalen College]], appointing Roman Catholics including Bishop Parker in their place. Controversially, James accredited the [[Nuncio|Papal Nuncio]] and granted public offices to four Catholic bishops.


James advocated [[repeal]] of the [[Penal law (British)|penal laws]] in all three of his kingdoms, but in the early years of his reign he refused to allow those dissenters who did not petition for relief to receive it.{{Efn|[[Covenanter]]s, as they did not recognize James (or any uncovenanted king) as a legitimate ruler, would not petition James for relief from the penal laws.}}<ref>{{Harvp|Macaulay|1889|page=242}}; {{Harvp|Harris|2006|pages=480–481}}</ref> James sent a letter to the Scottish Parliament at its opening in 1685, declaring his wish for new penal laws against refractory Presbyterians and lamented that he was not there in person to promote such a law. In response, the Parliament passed an Act that stated, "whoever should preach in a conventicle under a roof, or should attend, either as preacher or as a hearer, a conventicle in the open air, should be punished with death and confiscation of property".<ref>{{Harvp|Macaulay|1889|page=242}}; {{Harvp|Harris|2006|page=70}}</ref> In March 1686, James sent a letter to the Scottish Privy Council advocating toleration for Roman Catholics but not for rebellious Presbyterian Covenanters.<ref>{{Harvp|Macaulay|1889|pages=385–386}}; {{Harvp|Turner|1948|page=373}}</ref> Presbyterians would later call this period "[[The Killing Time]]".
James granted three Londoners and Virginia Catholic George Brent rights of religious freedom for the settlement of French [[Huguenots]] on the 30,000 acre (121 km&sup2;) Brenttown (Brenton) tract in old Prince William County, Virginia in 1687. Richard Foote, nephew of Nicholas Hayward (one of the founding partners), settled at [[Chotank]] in King George County, Virginia to manage the project. Nicholas Hayward marketed Brenttown to English Catholics after the Glorious Revolution eliminated most political reasons for French Protestants to leave England.


James allowed Roman Catholics to occupy the highest offices of his kingdoms, and received at his court the [[papal nuncio]], [[Ferdinando d'Adda]], the first representative from Rome to London since the reign of [[Mary I of England|Mary I]].<ref>{{Harvp|Miller|2000|page=142}}; {{Harvp|Macaulay|1889|page=445}}</ref> [[Sir Edward Petre, 3rd Baronet|Edward Petre]], James's [[Jesuit]] confessor, was a particular object of Anglican ire.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=195–196}} When the King's [[Secretary of State (England)|Secretary of State]], the [[Robert Spencer, 2nd Earl of Sunderland|Earl of Sunderland]], began replacing office-holders at court with "Papist" favourites, James began to lose the confidence of many of his Anglican supporters.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=150–152}} Sunderland's purge of office-holders even extended to the King's brothers-in-law (the Hydes) and their supporters.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=150–152}} Roman Catholics made up no more than one-fiftieth of the English population.{{Sfnp|Macaulay|1889|page=444}} In May 1686, James sought to obtain a ruling from the English common-law courts that showed he had the power to dispense with Acts of Parliament. He dismissed judges who disagreed with him on this matter, as well as the Solicitor General, [[Heneage Finch, 1st Earl of Aylesford|Heneage Finch]].{{Sfnp|Macaulay|1889|page=368}} The case of ''[[Godden v Hales]]'' affirmed his dispensing power,<ref>{{Harvp|Miller|2000|pages=156–157}}; {{Harvp|Harris|2006|pages=192–195}}</ref> with eleven out of the twelve judges ruling in the king's favour after six judges were dismissed for refusing to promise to support the king.<ref>{{Harvp|Macaulay|1889|pages=368–369}}; {{Harvp|Harris|2006|page=192}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Dixon |first=Dennis |date=20 November 2006 |title=Godden v Hales revisited – James II and the dispensing power |journal=The Journal of Legal History |volume=27 |issue=2 |pages=129–152 |doi=10.1080/01440360600831162 |issn=0144-0365}}</ref>
==Glorious Revolution==
{| align=left
|[[image:James2coin.jpg|frame|Half-Crown coin of James II, 1686. The inscription reads IACOBUS II DEI GRATIA (James II by the Grace of God)]]
|-
|}


In 1687, James issued the [[Declaration of Indulgence (1687)|Declaration of Indulgence]], also known as the Declaration for Liberty of Conscience, in which he used his dispensing power to negate the effect of laws punishing both Roman Catholics and Protestant [[English Dissenters|Dissenters]].{{Sfnp|Kenyon|1986|pages=389–391}} In the summer of 1687 he attempted to increase support for his tolerationist policy by a speaking tour of the western counties of England. As part of this tour, he gave a speech at Chester in which he said, "suppose... there should be a law made that all black men should be imprisoned, it would be unreasonable and we had as little reason to quarrel with other men for being of different [religious] opinions as for being of different complexions."{{Sfnp|Sowerby|2013|page=42}} At the same time, James provided partial toleration in Scotland, using his dispensing power to grant relief to Roman Catholics and partial relief to Presbyterians.<ref>{{Harvp|Macaulay|1889|page=429}}; {{Harvp|Harris|2006|pages=480–482}}</ref>
{{main|Glorious Revolution}}
In April 1688, James re-issued the Declaration of Indulgence, subsequently ordering Anglican clergymen to read it in their churches. When the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]] [[William Sancroft]] and six other bishops (known as the [[Seven Bishops]]) submitted a petition requesting the reconsideration of the King's religious policies, they were arrested and tried for [[seditious libel]], but were acquitted. Public alarm increased with the birth of a Catholic son and heir, James Francis Edward, to Queen Mary in June, 1688. (Some charged that the son was "suppositious", having been substituted for a stillborn child. There is, however, no reliable evidence to support such an allegation.) Threatened by a Catholic dynasty, several influential Protestants entered into negotiations with William, Prince of Orange, who was James's son-in-law. William had been hailed as a Protestant champion, having fought with the powerful Roman Catholic King of France, [[Louis XIV of France|Louis XIV]].


[[File:James II statue 1.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Statue of James II, Trafalgar Square|1686 statue of James II]] by [[Peter Van Dievoet]] in [[Trafalgar Square]], London|alt=]]
On [[30 June]] 1688&mdash;the same day the bishops were acquitted&mdash;a group of Protestant nobles, known as the [[Immortal Seven]], requested the Prince of Orange to come to [[England]] with an army. By September, it had become clear that William sought to invade; yet, James refused the assistance of Louis XIV, fearing that the English would oppose French intervention. James, furthermore, believed that his own army would be adequate, but proved too complacent; for when the Prince of Orange arrived on [[5 November]] 1688, many of the King's Protestant officers defected. His own daughter, [[Anne of Great Britain|Anne]], left the court, leading to considerable anguish on the part of the King. On [[11 December]], James attempted to flee to [[France]], first throwing the [[Great Seal of the Realm]] into the [[River Thames]]. He was, however, caught in [[Kent]]. Having no desire to make James a martyr, the Prince of Orange let him escape on [[23 December]]. James was received by Louis XIV, who offered him a palace and a generous pension.
In 1688, James ordered the Declaration read from the pulpits of every Anglican church, further alienating the Anglican bishops against the [[Supreme Governor of the Church of England|Supreme Governor of their church]].{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=216–224}} While the Declaration elicited some thanks from its beneficiaries, it left the Established Church, the traditional ally of the monarchy, in the difficult position of being forced to erode its own privileges.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=216–224}} James provoked further opposition by attempting to reduce the Anglican monopoly on education.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=224–229}} At the [[University of Oxford]], he offended Anglicans by allowing Roman Catholics to hold important positions in [[Christ Church, Oxford|Christ Church]] and [[University College, Oxford|University College]], two of Oxford's largest colleges. He also attempted to force the Fellows of [[Magdalen College, Oxford|Magdalen College]] to elect as their President [[Anthony Farmer]], a man of generally ill repute who was believed to be a Roman Catholic,{{Efn|name=farmer|Historians are unclear on Farmer's exact religious affiliation. Macaulay wrote that Farmer "pretended to turn Papist".{{Sfnp|Macaulay|1889|page=264}} Prall called him a "Catholic sympathizer".{{Sfnp|Prall|1972|page=148}} Miller wrote that "although he had not declared himself a Catholic, it was believed he was no longer an Anglican".{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=170}} Ashley did not refer to Farmer by name, but only as the King's Catholic nominee.{{Sfnp|Ashley|1996|page=89}} All these sources agreed that Farmer's bad reputation as a "person of scandalous character" was as much a deterrent to his nomination as his uncertain religious loyalties.{{Sfnp|Prall|1972|page=148}}}} which was seen as a violation of the Fellows' right to elect someone of their own choosing.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=224–229}}


In 1687, James prepared to pack Parliament with his supporters, so that it would repeal the Test Act and the Penal Laws. James was convinced by addresses from Dissenters that he had their support and so could dispense with relying on Tories and Anglicans. He instituted a wholesale purge of those in offices under the Crown opposed to his plan, appointing new [[Lord Lieutenant|lord-lieutenants of counties]] and remodelling the corporations governing towns and [[livery companies]].{{Sfnp|Jones|1988|page=132}} In October, James gave orders for the lord-lieutenants to provide three standard questions to all [[Justice of the Peace|Justices of the Peace]]: 1. Would they consent to the repeal of the Test Act and the Penal Laws? 2. Would they assist candidates who would do so? 3. Would they accept the Declaration of Indulgence? During the first three months of 1688, hundreds of those who gave negative replies to those questions were dismissed.{{Sfnp|Jones|1988|pages=132–133}} Corporations were purged by agents, known as the Regulators, who were given wide discretionary powers, in an attempt to create a permanent royal electoral machine.{{Sfnp|Jones|1988|page=146}} Most of the regulators were [[Baptists]], and the new town officials that they recommended included [[Quakers]], Baptists, [[Congregationalists]], [[Presbyterians]] and Roman Catholics, as well as [[Anglicans]].{{Sfnp|Sowerby|2013|pages=136–143}} Finally, on 24 August 1688, James ordered the issue of [[Writ of election|writs for a general election]].{{Sfnp|Jones|1988|page=150}} However, upon realising in September that William of Orange was going to land in England, James withdrew the writs and subsequently wrote to the lord-lieutenants to inquire over allegations of abuses committed during the regulations and election preparations, as part of the concessions he made to win support.{{Sfnp|Jones|1988|page=159}}
When James left the Realm, no Parliament was in session. Although a Parliament could normally be called by the reigning monarch, the Prince of Orange convened an irregular [[Convention Parliament]]. (The procedure of calling a Convention Parliament had been previously used when succession to the Throne was unclear; it was a Convention Parliament which restored Charles II to the Throne following the English Civil War.) The Convention declared, on [[12 February]] [[1689]], that James's attempt to flee on [[11 December]] constituted an abdication of the government, and that the Throne had then become vacant (instead of passing to James II's son, James Francis Edward). James's daughter Mary was declared Queen; she was to rule jointly with her husband William III. The Scottish Estates followed suit on [[11 April]] of the same year.


=== Deposition and the Glorious Revolution ===
William and Mary subsequently granted their assent to an Act commonly referred to as the [[Bill of Rights 1689|Bill of Rights]]. The Act confirmed the earlier Declaration of Right, in which the Convention Parliament had declared that James's flight constituted an abdication, and that William III and Mary II were to be King and Queen. The Bill of Rights also charged James II with abusing his power; amongst other things, it criticised the suspension of the Test Acts, the prosecution of the Seven Bishops for merely petitioning the Crown, the establishment of a standing army and the imposition of cruel punishments. The Bill also stipulated that no Catholic would henceforth be permitted to ascent to the English throne, nor could any English monarch marry a Catholic. The Act, furthermore, settled the question of succession to the Crown. First in the line of succession were the children of William and Mary (if any), to be followed by the Princess Anne and her children, and finally by the children of William by any subsequent marriage.'''
{{Main|Glorious Revolution}}
[[File:Willem III (1650-1702), prins van Oranje. Stadhouder, sedert 1689 tevens koning van Engeland Rijksmuseum SK-A-1228.jpeg|thumb|left|upright|James's nephew and son-in-law, [[William III of England|William of Orange]], was [[Invitation to William|invited to "save the Protestant religion"]].]]
In April 1688, James re-issued the Declaration of Indulgence, subsequently ordering Anglican clergy to read it in their churches.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=258–259}} When [[seven bishops]], including the [[William Sancroft|Archbishop of Canterbury]], submitted a petition requesting the reconsideration of the King's religious policies, they were arrested and tried for [[seditious libel]].<ref>{{Harvp|Harris|2006|pages=260–262}}; {{Harvp|Prall|1972|page=312}}</ref> Public alarm increased when Queen Mary gave birth to a Roman Catholic son and heir, [[James Francis Edward]], on 10 June that year.<ref>{{Harvp|Miller|2000|pages=186–187}}; {{Harvp|Harris|2006|pages=269–272}}</ref> When James's only possible successors were his two Protestant daughters, Anglicans could see his pro-Catholic policies as a temporary phenomenon, but when the prince's birth opened the possibility of a permanent Roman Catholic dynasty, such men had to reconsider their position.<ref>{{Harvp|Harris|2006|pages=271–272}}; {{Harvp|Ashley|1996|pages=110–111}}</ref> Threatened by a Roman Catholic dynasty, several influential Protestants claimed the child was [[Supposititious child|supposititious]] and had been smuggled into the Queen's bedchamber in a warming pan.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Gregg |first=Edward |title=Queen Anne |date=2000 |isbn=978-0-710-00400-0 |page=58|publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul }}</ref> They had already entered into negotiations with the Prince of Orange when it became known the Queen was pregnant, and the birth of a son reinforced their convictions.<ref>{{Harvp|Waller|2002|pages=43–46}}; {{Harvp|Miller|2000|pages=186–187}}</ref>


[[File:La Reception faite au Roy d'Angleterre par le Roy à St. Germain en Laye le VIIe janvier 1689.jpg|thumb|[[Louis XIV]] greeting the exiled James II in 1689 ("La Reception faite au Roy d'Angleterre par le Roy à St. Germain en Laye le VIIe janvier 1689", engraving by Nicolas Langlois, 1690)]]
==Later years==
With a French army on his side, James landed in Ireland in March 1689. The Irish Parliament did not follow the example of the English Parliament; it declared that James remained King. At James' urging, the Irish Parliament passed an Act for Liberty of Conscience which granted religious freedom to all Catholics and Protestants in Ireland. The king was, however, defeated at the [[Battle of the Boyne]] on [[1 July]] [[1690]]. He fled to [[France]] after the defeat departing from [[Kinsale]], his cowardice leading to the dissolution of much of his support and earning him the nickname ''Séamus á Chaca'' ("James the Shit") in Ireland.


On 30 June 1688, a group of seven Protestant nobles [[Invitation to William|invited William, Prince of Orange]], to come to England with an army.{{Sfnp|Ashley|1996|pages=201–202}} By September, it had become clear that William sought to invade.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=190–196}} Believing that his own army would be adequate, James refused the assistance of King [[Louis XIV]] of France, fearing that the English would oppose French intervention.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=190–196}} When William arrived on 5 November 1688, many Protestant officers, including [[John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough|Churchill]], defected and joined William, as did James's own daughter [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Anne]].{{Sfnp|Waller|2002|pages=236–239}} James lost his nerve and declined to attack the invading army, despite his army's numerical superiority.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=201–203}} On 11 December, James tried to flee to France, first throwing the [[Great Seal of the Realm]] into the [[River Thames]].{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=205–209}} He was captured in [[Kent]]; later, he was released and placed under Dutch protective guard. Having no desire to make James a martyr, William let him escape on 23 December.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=205–209}} James was received by his cousin and ally, Louis XIV, who offered him a palace and a pension.
In[[ France]], James was allowed to live in the royal château of [[Saint-Germain-en-Laye]]. An attempt was made to restore him to the Throne by assassinating William III in 1696, but the plot failed. Louis XIV's offer to have James elected [[Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth|King of Poland]] in the same year was rejected, for James feared that acceptance of the Polish Crown might (in the minds of the English People) render him incapable of being King of England. Thereafter, Louis ceased to offer assistance to James; his decision was formalised by the [[Treaty of Ryswick]] (an agreement with William III) in 1697. During his last years, James lived as an austere penitent. He died of a brain haemorrhage in 1701 at [[Saint-Germain-en-Laye]], where he was buried.


William summoned a [[Convention Parliament (1689)|Convention Parliament]] to decide how to handle James's flight. It convened on 22 January 1689.<ref>{{Cite ODNB |last=Claydon |first=Tony |authorlink=Tony Claydon |date=2008 |url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-29450 |title=William III and II |edition=online |doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/29450 |isbn=978-0-198-61412-8}}; {{Cite journal |last=Plumb |first=J. H. |authorlink=John H. Plumb |date=1937 |title=The Elections to the Convention Parliament of 1689 |journal=[[The Cambridge Historical Journal]] |volume=5 |issue=3 |pages=235–254 |doi=10.1017/S1474691300001529 |jstor=3020731}}</ref> While the Parliament refused to depose him, they declared that James, having fled to France and dropped the Great Seal into the Thames, had effectively [[abdication|abdicated]], and that the throne had thereby become vacant.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=209}}{{Efn|Harris analyses the legal nature of the abdication; James did not agree that he had abdicated.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=320–328}}}} To fill this vacancy, James's daughter Mary was declared Queen; she was to rule jointly with her husband William, who would be King. On 11 April 1689, the [[Parliament of Scotland]] declared James to have forfeited the throne of Scotland as well.<ref>{{Harvp|Devine|2006|page=3}}; {{Harvp|Harris|2006|pages=402–407}}</ref> The Convention Parliament issued a [[Declaration of Right, 1689|Declaration of Right]] on 12 February that denounced James for abusing his power, and proclaimed many limitations on royal authority. The abuses charged to James included the suspension of the Test Acts, the prosecution of the Seven Bishops for merely petitioning the Crown, the establishment of a standing army, and the imposition of cruel punishments.<ref>{{Harvp|Ashley|1996|pages=206–209}}; {{Harvp|Harris|2006|pages=329–348}}</ref> The Declaration was the basis for the [[Bill of Rights 1689|Bill of Rights]] enacted later in 1689. The Bill also declared that henceforth, no Roman Catholic was permitted to ascend the English throne, nor could any English monarch marry a Roman Catholic.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=349–350}}
==Legacy==
James's younger daughter Anne succeeded to the throne when William III died in 1702. (Mary II had died in 1694.) The [[Act of Settlement 1701]] provided that, if the line of succession established in the Bill of Rights were to be extinguished, then the Crown would go to a German cousin, [[Sophia of Hanover|Sophia, Electress of Hanover]], and to her Protestant heirs. Thus, when Anne died in 1714 (less than two months after the death of Sophia), the Crown was inherited by [[George I of Great Britain|George I]], Sophia's son and Anne's second cousin.


== Attempt to regain the throne ==
The son of James II, [[James Francis Edward Stuart]] (known to his supporters as "James III and VIII" and to his opponents as the "Old Pretender"), took up the Jacobite cause. He led a rising in Scotland in 1715 shortly after George I's accession, but was defeated. Further risings were also defeated; since the rising of 1745 led by [[Charles Edward Stuart]], no serious attempt to restore the Stuart heir has been made, although some individuals still adhere to the philosophy of Jacobitism.
=== War in Ireland ===
{{Main|Williamite War in Ireland}}
[[File:Jan van Huchtenburg - De slag aan de Boyne.jpg|thumb|''[[Battle of the Boyne]] between James II and William III, 11 July 1690'' by [[Huchtenburg]]]]
With the assistance of French troops, James landed in Ireland in March 1689.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=222–224}} The [[Patriot Parliament|Irish Parliament]] did not follow the example of the English Parliament; it declared that James remained King and passed a massive [[Bill of attainder#The Great Act of Attainder|bill of attainder]] against those who had rebelled against him.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=226–227}} At James's urging, the Irish Parliament passed an Act for Liberty of Conscience that granted religious freedom to all Roman Catholics and Protestants in Ireland.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|page=440}} James worked to build an army in Ireland, but was ultimately defeated at the [[Battle of the Boyne]] on 1 July 1690 [[Old Style and New Style dates|O.S.]] when William arrived, personally leading an army to defeat James and reassert English control.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=446–449}} James fled to France once more, departing from [[Kinsale]], never to return to any of his former kingdoms.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=446–449}} Because he deserted his Irish supporters, James became known in Ireland as ''Séamus an Chaca'' or "James the shit".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Fitzpatrick |first=Brendan |title=New Gill History of Ireland 3: Seventeenth-Century Ireland – The War of Religions |year=1988 |page=253 |publisher=Gill and Macmillan |isbn=0-7171-1626-3}}; {{Cite book |title=The Jacobites, Britain and Europe, 1688–1788 |last=Szechi |first=Daniel |year=1994 |publisher=Manchester University Press |page=48 |isbn=0-7190-3774-3}}</ref> Despite this popular perception, later historian [[Breandán Ó Buachalla]] argues that "Irish political poetry for most of the eighteenth century is essentially Jacobite poetry",<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ó Buachalla |first=Breandán |date=Spring–Summer 1992 |title=Irish Jacobite Poetry |journal=[[The Irish Review]] |issue=12 |pages=40–49 |doi=10.2307/29735642 |jstor=29735642 |authorlink=Breandán Ó Buachalla}}</ref> and both Ó Buachalla and fellow-historian [[Éamonn Ó Ciardha]] argue that James and his successors played a central role as messianic figures throughout the 18th century for all classes in Ireland.<ref>{{Harvp|Ó Buachalla|1996}}; {{Harvp|Ó Ciardha|2002}}</ref>


=== Return to exile, death and legacy ===
James Francis Edward died in 1766, when he was succeeded by his eldest son, [[Charles Edward Stuart]] (known to his supporters as "Charles III" and to his opponents as the "Young Pretender"). Charles in turn was succeeded by his younger brother [[Henry Benedict Stuart]], a [[cardinal (Catholicism)|cardinal]] of the [[Catholic Church]]. Henry was the last of James II's legitimate descendants. At his death in 1807 the Jacobite claim devolved upon the senior descendant of King [[Charles I of England|Charles I]], King [[Charles Emmanuel IV of Savoy|Charles Emmanuel IV of Sardinia]]. Presently, James II's heir is [[Franz, Duke of Bavaria]]. Although the [[Duke of Bavaria]] has not claimed the throne, he is recognised by Jacobites as "Francis II."
[[File:Château de Saint-Germain-en-Laye01.jpg|thumb|The [[Château de Saint-Germain-en-Laye]], James's home during his final exile]]
[[File:James II Tomb.jpg|thumb|Tomb of James II & VII in the parish church of [[Saint-Germain-en-Laye]], commissioned in 1828 by [[George IV of the United Kingdom|George IV]] when the church was rebuilt]]


In France, James was allowed to live in the royal château of [[Saint-Germain-en-Laye]].{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=235}} James's wife and some of his supporters fled with him, including the [[John Drummond, 1st Earl of Melfort|Earl of Melfort]]; most, but not all, were Roman Catholic.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=235–236}} In 1692, James's last child, [[Louisa Maria Teresa Stuart|Louisa Maria Teresa]], was born.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.burkespeerage.com |title=Burke's Peerage |edition=Second World War |access-date=23 June 2021 |page=228 |url-access=subscription}}</ref> Some supporters in England [[Jacobite assassination plot 1696|attempted to assassinate]] William III to restore James to the throne in 1696, but the plot failed and the backlash made James's cause less popular.<ref>{{Harvp|Miller|2000|page=238}}; {{Harvp|Waller|2002|page=350}}</ref> In the same year, Louis XIV offered to have James [[Royal elections in Poland|elected]] [[Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth|King of Poland]]. James rejected the offer, fearing that accepting the Polish crown might (in the minds of the English people) disqualify him from being King of England. After Louis concluded peace with William in 1697, he ceased to offer much assistance to James.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=239}}
==Style and arms==

The official style of James II was "James the Second, by the Grace of God, [[List of monarchs of England |King of England]], [[List of Monarchs of Scotland | Scotland]], [[English Kings of France | France]] and [[Kingdom of Ireland| Ireland]], [[Fidei defensor|Defender of the Faith]], etc." (The [[English claims to the French throne|claim to France]] was only nominal, and was asserted by every English King from [[Edward III of England|Edward III]] to [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]], regardless of the amount of French territory actually controlled.) His [[heraldry|arms]] as King were: ''Quarterly, I and IV Grandquarterly, Azure three fleurs-de-lis Or (for France) and Gules three lions passant guardant in pale Or (for [[Coat of arms of England|England]]); II Or a lion rampant within a tressure flory-counter-flory Gules (for Scotland); III Azure a harp Or stringed Argent (for [[Coat of Arms of the Republic of Ireland|Ireland]])''. He was created "[[Duke of Normandy]]" by King Louis XIV of France, December 31, 1660, the last [[English monarch]] to hold the title.
During his last years, James lived as an austere [[penitent]].{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|pages=234–236}} He wrote a memorandum for his son advising him on how to govern England, specifying that Catholics should possess one Secretary of State, one Commissioner of the Treasury, the Secretary at War, with the majority of the officers in the army.{{Sfnp|Macaulay|1889|page=445}}

James died aged 67 of a [[brain haemorrhage]] on 16 September 1701 at [[Saint-Germain-en-Laye]].<ref>{{Harvp|Miller|2000|page=240}}; [[Parish register]] of [[Saint-Germain-en-Laye]], with transcription, at [http://www.frontenac-ameriques.org/louis-de-frontenac/article/la-ville-de-saint-germain-en-laye Association Frontenac-Amériques] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121110014232/http://www.frontenac-ameriques.org/louis-de-frontenac/article/la-ville-de-saint-germain-en-laye |date=10 November 2012 }} (in French)</ref> James's heart was placed in a silver-gilt locket and given to the convent at [[Chaillot]], and his brain was placed in a lead casket and given to the [[Scots College (Paris)|Scots College]] in Paris. His entrails were placed in two gilt urns and sent to the parish church of Saint-Germain-en-Laye and the [[Colleges of St Omer, Bruges and Liège|English Jesuit college at Saint-Omer]], while the flesh from his right arm was given to the English Augustinian nuns of Paris.{{Sfnp|Mann|2014|page=223}}

The rest of James's body was laid to rest in a triple [[sarcophagus]] (consisting of two wooden coffins and one of lead) at the St Edmund's Chapel in the Church of the English [[Benedictine]]s in the [[Rue Saint-Jacques, Paris]], with a funeral oration by [[Henri-Emmanuel de Roquette]].{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=240}} James was not buried, but put in one of the side chapels. Lights were kept burning round his coffin until the [[French Revolution]]. In 1734, the [[Archbishop of Paris]] heard evidence to support James's canonisation, but nothing came of it.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=240}} During the French Revolution, James's tomb was raided.{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=240}}{{Efn|name=burial|MacLeod and Waller wrote that all of James's remains were lost in the French Revolution. The ''[[English Illustrated Magazine]]''{{'}}s [https://archive.org/details/englishillustra10unkngoog/page/n600/mode/2up article] on St. Germain from September 1903 claimed that parts of his bowel interred at the [[Saint-Germain-en-Laye#Saint-Germain parish church|parish church of St. Germain-en-Laye]] were rediscovered in 1824 and reburied.{{Sfnp|Hilliam|1998|page=205}} Hilliam disputed that his remains were either scattered or lost, stating that when revolutionaries broke into the church, they were amazed at the body's preservation and it was put on public exhibition where miracles were said to have happened. Hilliam stated that the body was then kept "above ground" until [[George IV]] heard about it and ordered the body buried in the parish church of St Germain-en-Laye in 1824.<ref>{{Harvp|Waller|2002|page=401}}; {{Harvp|MacLeod|1999|p=349}}</ref>}}

== Later Hanover succession ==
[[File:Pretend3.jpeg|thumb|upright|[[James Francis Edward Stuart|James's son]] was known as "James III and VIII" to his supporters, and "The Old Pretender" to his enemies.]]

James's younger daughter [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Anne]] succeeded when William died in 1702. The [[Act of Settlement 1701|Act of Settlement]] provided that, if the line of succession established in the Bill of Rights were extinguished, the crown would go to a German cousin, [[Sophia, Electress of Hanover]], and to her Protestant heirs.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|page=493}} Sophia was a granddaughter of [[James VI and I]] through his eldest daughter, [[Elizabeth of Bohemia|Elizabeth Stuart]], the sister of [[Charles I of England|Charles I]]. Thus, when Anne died in 1714 (less than two months after the death of Sophia), she was succeeded by [[George I of Great Britain|George I]], Sophia's son, the Elector of Hanover and Anne's second cousin.{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|page=493}}

== Subsequent uprisings and pretenders ==
James's son [[James Francis Edward]] was recognised as king at his father's death by Louis XIV of France and James II's remaining supporters (later known as [[Jacobitism|Jacobites]]) as "James III and VIII".{{Sfnp|MacLeod|1999|p=349}} He led a [[Jacobite rising of 1715|rising]] in Scotland in 1715 shortly after George I's accession, but was defeated.{{Sfnp|MacLeod|1999|pp=361–363}} His son [[Charles Edward Stuart]] led a [[Jacobite rising in 1745]], but was again defeated.{{Sfnp|MacLeod|1999|pp=365–371}} The risings were the last serious attempts to restore the Stuart dynasty.

Charles's claims passed to his younger brother [[Henry Benedict Stuart]], the [[Dean of the College of Cardinals]] of the Roman Catholic Church.{{Sfnp|MacLeod|1999|pp=371–372}} Henry was the last of James II's legitimate descendants, and no relative has publicly acknowledged the [[Jacobite claim]] since his death in 1807.{{Sfnp|MacLeod|1999|pp=373–374}}

==Historiography==
[[File:Thomas Babington Macaulay2.jpg|left|thumb|upright|[[Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay|Macaulay]] wrote in the [[Whig history|Whig]] tradition.]]
[[File:Hilaire Belloc (side view, 1910).jpg|upright|left|thumb|[[Hilaire Belloc|Belloc]] was a notable [[apologist]] for James II.]]

Historical analysis of James II has been somewhat revised since [[Whig history|Whig]] historians, led by [[Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay|Lord Macaulay]], cast James as a cruel absolutist and his reign as "tyranny which approached to insanity".{{Sfnp|Macaulay|1889|page=239}} Subsequent scholars, such as [[G. M. Trevelyan]] (Macaulay's great-nephew) and [[David Ogg (historian)|David Ogg]], while more balanced than Macaulay, still characterised James as a tyrant, his attempts at religious tolerance as a fraud, and his reign as an aberration in the course of British history.<ref>See Prall, vii–xv, for a more detailed historiography.</ref> In 1892, [[A. W. Ward]] wrote for the [[Dictionary of National Biography]] that James was "obviously a political and religious bigot", although never devoid of "a vein of patriotic sentiment"; "his conversion to the church of Rome made the emancipation of his fellow-catholics in the first instance, and the recovery of England for catholicism in the second, the governing objects of his policy."<ref>{{Cite DNB|wstitle=James II of England}}</ref>

[[Hilaire Belloc]], a writer and Catholic apologist, broke with this tradition in 1928, casting James as an honourable man and a true advocate for freedom of conscience, and his enemies "men in the small clique of great fortunes&nbsp;... which destroyed the ancient monarchy of the English".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Belloc |first=Hilaire |title=James the Second |date=1928 |isbn=978-0-8369-5922-2 |authorlink=Hilaire Belloc |page=vii|publisher=J. B. Lippincott Company }}</ref> However, he observed that James "concluded the Catholic church to be the sole authoritative voice on earth, and thenceforward&nbsp;... he not only stood firm against surrender but on no single occasion contemplated the least compromise or by a word would modify the impression made."

By the 1960s and 1970s, [[Maurice Ashley (historian)|Maurice Ashley]] and Stuart Prall began to reconsider James's motives in granting religious toleration, while still taking note of James's autocratic rule.{{Sfnp|Ashley|1996|pages=196–198}}{{Sfnp|Prall|1972|pages=291–293}} Modern historians have moved away from the school of thought that preached the continuous march of progress and democracy, Ashley contending that "history is, after all, the story of human beings and individuals, as well as of the classes and the masses."{{Sfnp|Ashley|1996|page=9}} He cast James II and William III as "men of ideals as well as human weaknesses".{{Sfnp|Ashley|1996|page=9}} [[John Miller (historian)|John Miller]], writing in 2000, accepted the claims of James's absolutism, but argued that "his main concern was to secure religious liberty and civil equality for Catholics. Any 'absolutist' methods&nbsp;... were essentially means to that end."{{Sfnp|Miller|2000|page=ix}}

In 2004, [[W. A. Speck]] wrote in the new [[Oxford Dictionary of National Biography]] that "James was genuinely committed to religious toleration, but also sought to increase the power of the crown."<ref name=speck>{{Cite encyclopedia |authorlink=W. A. Speck |last=Speck |first=W.A. |url=http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/14593 |title=James II and VII (1633–1701) |encyclopedia=[[Oxford Dictionary of National Biography]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |date=September 2004 |doi=10.1093/ref:odnb/14593 |edition=online May 2006 |access-date=15 October 2007 |quote=He 'wished that all his subjects could be as convinced as he was that the Catholic church was the one true church. He was also convinced that the established church was maintained artificially by penal laws that proscribed nonconformity. If these were removed, and conversions to Catholicism were encouraged, then many would take place. In the event his optimism was misplaced, for few converted. James underestimated the appeal of Protestantism in general and the Church of England in particular. His was the zeal and even bigotry of a narrow-minded convert...'}}</ref> He added that, unlike the government of the Netherlands, "James was too autocratic to combine freedom of conscience with popular government. He resisted any check on the monarch's power. That is why his heart was not in the concessions he had to make in 1688. He would rather live in exile with his principles intact than continue to reign as a limited monarch."<ref name=speck/>

[[Timothy J. G. Harris|Tim Harris's]] conclusions from his 2006 book summarised the ambivalence of modern scholarship towards James II:{{Blockquote|The jury will doubtless remain out on James for a long time&nbsp;... Was he an egotistical bigot&nbsp;... a tyrant who rode roughshod over the will of the vast majority of his subjects (at least in England and Scotland)&nbsp;... simply naïve, or even perhaps plain stupid, unable to appreciate the realities of political power&nbsp;... Or was he a well-intentioned and even enlightened ruler—an enlightened despot well ahead of his time, perhaps—who was merely trying to do what he thought was best for his subjects?{{Sfnp|Harris|2006|pages=478–479}}}}

In 2009, [[Steven Pincus]] confronted that scholarly ambivalence in ''1688: The First Modern Revolution.'' Pincus claims that James's reign must be understood within a context of economic change and European politics, and makes two major assertions about James II. The first of these is that James purposefully "followed the French Sun King, Louis XIV, in trying to create a modern Catholic polity. This involved not only trying to Catholicize England&nbsp;... but also creating a modern, centralizing, and extremely bureaucratic state apparatus."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Pincus |first=Steven |title=1688: The First Modern Revolution |date=2009 |isbn=978-0-3001-1547-5 |page=475|publisher=Yale University Press }}</ref> The second is that James was undone in 1688 far less by Protestant reaction against Catholicization than by nationwide hostile reaction against his intrusive bureaucratic state and taxation apparatus, expressed in massive popular support for William of Orange's armed invasion of England. Pincus presents James as neither naïve nor stupid nor egotistical. Instead, readers are shown an intelligent, clear-thinking strategically motivated monarch whose vision for a French authoritarian political model and alliance clashed with, and lost out to, alternative views that favoured an entrepreneurial Dutch economic model, feared French power, and were outraged by James's authoritarianism.

[[Scott Sowerby]] countered Pincus's thesis in 2013 in ''Making Toleration: The Repealers and the Glorious Revolution.'' He noted that English taxes remained low during James II's reign, at about 4% of the English national income, and thus it was unlikely that James could have built a bureaucratic state on the model of Louis XIV's France, where taxes were at least twice as high as a proportion of GDP.{{Sfnp|Sowerby|2013|pages=51–53}} Sowerby also contends that James's policies of religious toleration attracted substantial support from religious nonconformists, including Quakers, Baptists, Congregationalists and Presbyterians, who were attracted by the king's push for a new "Magna Carta for liberty of conscience".{{Sfnp|Sowerby|2013|pages=43–44}} The king was overthrown, in Sowerby's view, largely because of fears among the Dutch and English elites that James might be aligning himself with Louis XIV in a supposed "holy league" to destroy Protestantism across northern Europe.{{Sfnp|Sowerby|2013|pages=227–239}} Sowerby presents James's reign as a struggle between those who believed that the king was sincerely devoted to liberty of conscience and those who were sceptical of the king's espousals of toleration and believed that he had a hidden agenda to overthrow English Protestantism.

==Titles, styles, honours, and arms==
[[File:James2coin.jpg|thumb|right|upright|[[Half crown (British coin)|Half crown coin]] of James II, 1686]]

===Titles and styles===
* 14 October 1633 – 6 February 1685: <!--sources from the time call him HRH after 1680 but not before 1660--> The Duke of York
* 10 May 1659 – 6 February 1685: The Earl of Ulster<ref name="weir">[[Alison Weir|Weir, Alison]] (1996). 258. ''Britain's Royal Families: The Complete Genealogy''. Revised Edition. Random House, London. {{ISBN|0-7126-7448-9}}.</ref>
* 31 December 1660 – 6 February 1685: <!--sources from the time call him HRH after 1680 but not before 1660--> The Duke of Albany
* 6 February 1685 – 23 December 1688 (by [[Jacobitism|Jacobites]] until 16 September 1701): His Majesty The King

The official style of James in England was "James the Second, by the Grace of God, King of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, [[Defender of the Faith]], etc." The [[English claims to the French throne|claim to France]] was only nominal, and was asserted by every English king from [[Edward III]] to [[George III]], regardless of the amount of French territory actually controlled. In Scotland, he was "James the Seventh, by the Grace of God, King of Scotland, England, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, etc."<ref name="ReferenceA"/>

James was created [[Duke of Normandy]] by King Louis XIV of France on 31 December 1660.<ref name="weir"/>

In 1734 the [[Charles-Gaspard-Guillaume de Vintimille du Luc|Archbishop of Paris]] opened the cause for the canonisation of James as a saint, making him a [[Servant of God]] among Catholics.<ref>{{Cite web|first=Charles|last=Coulombe|authorlink=Charles A. Coulombe|date=5 March 2019|url=https://catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2019/03/05/the-forgotten-canonisation-cause-of-king-james-ii/|title=The forgotten canonisation Cause of King James II|work=Catholic Herald|access-date=20 June 2019}}</ref>

===Honours===
* '''KG''': [[Knight of the Garter]], 20 April 1642<ref name="weir"/>

;Appointments
* [[Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports]], 1660–1669<ref>{{cite web|url=https://cinqueports.org/history/lord-warden-officials/list-of-lord-wardens/|title=List of Lord Wardens|work=The Confederation of Cinque Ports|access-date=31 March 2024}}</ref>

===Arms===
Prior to his accession, James's coat of arms was the [[Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom|royal arms]] (which he later inherited), differenced by a [[Label (heraldry)|label]] of three points [[Ermine (heraldry)|Ermine]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.heraldica.org/topics/britain/cadency.htm|title=Marks of cadency in the British royal family|first=Francois R.|last=Velde|website=Heraldica}}</ref> His arms as king were: [[Quartering (heraldry)|Quarterly]], I and IV Grandquarterly, [[Azure (heraldry)|Azure]] three [[fleurs-de-lis]] [[Or (heraldry)|Or]] (for France) and [[Gules]] three lions [[Attitude (heraldry)#Passant|passant guardant]] in [[Pale (heraldry)|pale]] Or ([[Coat of arms of England|for England]]); II Or a lion [[rampant]] within a double [[tressure]] flory-counter-flory Gules ([[Royal arms of Scotland|for Scotland]]); III Azure a harp Or stringed [[Argent]] ([[Coat of arms of Ireland|for Ireland]]).

{{Multiple image
| align = center
| header = James II's coat of arms
| total_width = 400
| image1 = Coat of Arms of James Stuart, Duke of York.svg
| caption1 = Coat of arms of James, Duke of York, KG
| image2 = Coat of Arms of England (1660-1689).svg
| caption2 = Coat of arms of James II as king (outside Scotland)
| image3 = Coat of Arms of Scotland (1660-1689).svg
| caption3 = Coat of arms of King James VII in Scotland
}}

== Family tree ==
In four generations of Stuarts, there were seven reigning monarchs (not including Hanover's [[George I of Great Britain|George I]]). James II was the fourth Stuart monarch in England, the second of his generation and the father of two more.

{{wide image|House of Stuart.png|1500px|Principal members of the [[House of Stuart]] following the 1603 Union of the Crowns}}

== Issue ==
===Legitimate issue===
{| class="wikitable"


==Issue==
{| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse;"
|- bgcolor=cccccc
!Name!!Birth!!Death!!Notes
|-
|-
! Name
|colspan=4|'''''By [[Anne Hyde]]'''''
! Birth
! Death
! Notes

|-
|-
| colspan=4|'''''By [[Anne Hyde]]'''''
|Charles, Duke of Cambridge||[[22 October]] [[1660]]||[[5 May]] [[1661]]||&nbsp;

|-
|-
| [[Charles Stuart, Duke of Cambridge (1660–1661)|Charles, Duke of Cambridge]]
|[[Mary II of England|Mary II]]||[[30 April]] [[1662]]||[[28 December]] [[1694]]||married 1677, [[William III of England|William III, Prince of Orange]]; no issue
| 22 October 1660
| 5 May 1661
| &nbsp;

|-
|-
| [[Mary II]]
|[[James Stuart, Duke of Cambridge|James, Duke of Cambridge]]||[[12 July]] [[1663]]||[[22 May]] [[1667]]||&nbsp;
| 30 April 1662
| 28 December 1694
| married 1677, [[William III of England|William III, Prince of Orange]]; no issue

|-
|-
| [[James Stuart, Duke of Cambridge|James, Duke of Cambridge]]
|[[Anne of Great Britain|Queen Anne]]||[[6 February]] [[1665]]||[[1 August]] [[1714]]||married 1683, [[Prince George of Denmark]]; no surviving issue
| 11 or 12 July 1663
| 20 June 1667
| &nbsp;

|-
|-
| [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain]]
|[[Charles Stuart, Duke of Kendal|Charles, Duke of Kendal]]||[[4 July]] [[1666]]||[[20 June]] [[1667]]||&nbsp;
| 6 February 1665
| 1 August 1714
| married 1683, [[Prince George of Denmark]]; no surviving issue

|-
|-
|[[Edgar Stuart, Duke of Cambridge|Edgar, Duke of Cambridge]]||[[14 September]] [[1667]]||[[15 November]] [[1669]]||&nbsp;
| [[Charles Stuart, Duke of Kendal|Charles, Duke of Kendal]]
| 4 July 1666
| 22 May 1667
| &nbsp;

|-
|-
| [[Edgar Stuart, Duke of Cambridge|Edgar, Duke of Cambridge]]
|Henrietta||[[13 January]] [[1669]]||[[15 November]] [[1669]]||&nbsp;
| 14 September 1667
| 8 June 1671
| &nbsp;

|-
|-
| Henrietta
|Catherine||[[9 February]] [[1671]]||[[5 December]] [[1671]]||&nbsp;
| 13 January 1669
| 15 November 1669
| &nbsp;

|-
|-
| Catherine
|colspan=4|'''''By [[Mary of Modena]]'''''
| 9 February 1671
| 5 December 1671
| &nbsp;

|-
|-
| colspan=4|'''''By [[Mary of Modena]]'''''
|Catherine||[[10 January]] [[1675]]||[[3 October]] [[1675]]||&nbsp;

|-
|-
| Unnamed child
|[[Isabel Stuart|Isabel]]||[[28 August]] [[1676]]||[[2 March]] [[1681]]||&nbsp;
| colspan=2 align=center|March or May 1674
| stillbirth<ref name="Weir, 260">Weir, p. 260</ref>

|-
|-
| Catherine Laura
|Charles||[[7 November]] [[1677]]||[[12 December]] [[1677]]||&nbsp;
| 10 January 1675
| 3 October 1675
| died of convulsions<ref name="Weir, 260"/>

|-
|-
| Unnamed child
|Elizabeth||1678||c. 1678||&nbsp;
| colspan=2 align=center|October 1675
| stillbirth<ref name="Weir, 260"/>

|-
|-
| [[Isabel Stuart|Isabel]] (or Isabella)
|Charlotte||[[16 August]] [[1682]]||[[16 October]] [[1682]]||&nbsp;
| 28 August 1676
| 2 or 4 March 1681
| buried in [[Westminster Abbey]] on 4 March (Old Style) as "The Lady Isabella, daughter to the Duke of York"<ref>{{Cite book |first=J. L. |last=Chester |title=The Marriage, Baptismal, and Burial Registers of the Collegiate Church or Abbey of St. Peter, Westminster |volume=10 |publisher=Harleian Society |date=1876 |page=201 |authorlink=Joseph Lemuel Chester}}</ref>

|-
|-
| [[Charles Stuart, Duke of Cambridge (born 1677)|Charles, Duke of Cambridge]]
|[[James Francis Edward Stuart|James, Prince of Wales]]||[[10 June]] [[1688]]||[[1 January]] [[1766]]||married [[1719]], [[Maria Klementyna Sobieska|Mary Sobieski]]; had issue
| 7 November 1677
| 12 December 1677
| died of [[smallpox]]<ref name="Weir, 260"/>

|-
|-
| Elizabeth
|[[Louise Stuart|Louise]]||[[28 June]] [[1692]]||[[20 April]] [[1712]]||&nbsp;
| colspan=2 align=center|{{Circa|1678}}
| &nbsp;

|-
|-
| Unnamed child
|colspan=4|'''''By [[Arabella Churchill (royal mistress)|Arabella Churchill]] '''''
| colspan=2 align=center|February 1681
| stillbirth<ref name="Weir, 260"/>

|-
|-
| Charlotte Maria
|[[Henrietta FitzJames]] ||1667||[[3 April]], [[1730]]||Married first [[Henry Waldegrave, 1st Baron Waldegrave|Henry Waldegrave]]; had issue. Married secondly [[Piers Butler, 3rd Viscount Galmoye]]; no issue.
| 16 August 1682
| 16 October 1682
| died of convulsions<ref name="Weir, 260"/> and buried in Westminster Abbey on 8 October (Old Style) as "The Lady Charlotte-Marie, daughter to the Duke of York"{{Sfnp|Chester|1876|page=206}}

|-
|-
| Unnamed child
|[[James FitzJames, 1st Duke of Berwick]] ||[[21 August]], [[1670]]||[[12 June]], [[1734]]||
| colspan=2 align=center|October 1683
| stillbirth<ref name="Weir, 260"/>

|-
|-
| Unnamed child
|[[Henry FitzJames, 1st Duke of Albemarle]]||August, 1673||December, 1702||
| colspan=2 align=center|May 1684
| stillbirth<ref>Weir, 261</ref>

|-
|-
| [[James Francis Edward Stuart|James, Prince of Wales "the Old Pretender"]]
|[[Arabella FitzJames]]||1674||[[7 November]] [[1704]]||Became a nun; no issue.
| 10 June 1688
| 1 January 1766
| married 1719, [[Maria Clementina Sobieska|Clementina Sobieska]]; had issue

|-
|-
| [[Louisa Maria Teresa Stuart|Louisa Maria Teresa]]
|colspan=4|'''''By [[Catherine Sedley]]'''''
| 28 June 1692
| 18 April 1712
| no issue

|}

===Illegitimate issue===
{| class="wikitable"

|-
|-
! Name
|[[Catherine Darnley]]||c. 1681||[[13 March]] [[1743]]||married firstly, [[James Annesley, 3rd Earl of Anglesey]] and had issue,<br> married secondly, [[John Sheffield, 1st Duke of Buckingham and Normanby]] and had issue.
! Birth
! Death
! Notes

|-
|-
| colspan=4|'''''By [[Arabella Churchill (royal mistress)|Arabella Churchill]] '''''
|}


|-
==Miscellaneous==
| [[Henrietta FitzJames]]
| 1667
| 3 April 1730
| Married, firstly, [[Henry Waldegrave, 1st Baron Waldegrave|Henry Waldegrave]]; had issue. Married, secondly, [[Piers Butler, 3rd Viscount Galmoye]]; no issue.


|-
James was responsible for the last major redevelopments at the [[Palace of Whitehall]] prior to its destruction by fire.
| [[James FitzJames, 1st Duke of Berwick]]
| 21 August 1670
| 12 June 1734
| Married, firstly, Lady Honora Burke (a/k/a Lady Honora de Burgh) and had issue. Married, secondly, Anne Bulkely and had issue.<ref name="weir263"/>


|-
==External links==
| [[Henry FitzJames, 1st Duke of Albemarle]]
*[http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=1976 King James II on Find-A-Grave]
| August 1673
| December 1702
| Married Marie Gabrielle d'Audibert de Lussan; had issue.


|-
==References==
| Arabella FitzJames
<div class="references-small">
| 1674
*Clarke, James S. (Editor). (1816). ''The Life of James II.'' London.
| 7 November 1704
*[http://www.worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/ow/3401f99806cb2c2c.html Davis, Richard B. (Editor). (1963). ''William Fitzhugh and His Chesapeake World, 1676-1701.'' Chapel Hill: The Virginia Historical Society by University of North Carolina Press.]
| Became a nun under the name Ignatia.<ref name="weir263"/>
*"James II." (1911). ''Encyclopædia Britannica,'' 11th ed. London: Cambridge University Press.
*Miller, John (2000). ''James II'', 3d. ed. Yale University Press.
*[http://jacobite.ca/kings/james2.htm McFerran, Noel S. (2003). "James II and VII."]
*Turner, Francis C. (1948). ''James II.'' London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.
</div>


{{start box}}
{{s-hou|Stuart|[[14 October]]|1633|[[16 September]]|1701}}
{{succession box three to three|before=[[Charles II of England|Charles II]]|title1=[[King of England]]|years1=[[6 February]][[1685]] &ndash;1688|title2=[[King of Scots]]|years2=[[6 February]][[1685]] &ndash;1688|
title3=[[King of Ireland]]|years3=[[6 February]][[1685]] &ndash;1688( or 1690 )|after=[[William III of England|William III/II]] and [[Mary II of England|Mary II]]}}
|-
|-
| colspan=4|'''''By [[Catherine Sedley]]'''''
{{s-new|rows=2|reason=[[Glorious Revolution]]<br/>replaces government<br/>with [[William III of England|William III]] and [[Mary II of England|Mary II]]}}
{{s-ptd|title=[[Gallery of Jacobite pretenders|Jacobite]] [[List of British monarchs|King of England and Scotland]]|years=1688&ndash;[[1701]][King of Ireland]]|years=1688&ndash;1701|reason=Succession overruled by the [[Parliament of England]]}}
{{s-aft|rows=2|after=[[James Francis Edward Stuart|James III]]}}
{{s-ptd|title=[[Gallery of Jacobite pretenders|Jacobite]] [[King of Ireland]]|years=1690&ndash;1701}}
{{succession box|before=Vacant|title=[[Lord High Admiral]]|
years=1660&ndash;1673 |
after=[[Charles II of England|Charles II]]}}
{{succession box|before=[[Heneage Finch, 3rd Earl of Winchilsea|The Earl of Winchilsea]]|title=[[Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports]]|years=1660&ndash;1673|after=[[John Beaumont (soldier)|John Beamont]]}}
{{succession box|title=[[Lord High Admiral of Scotland]]|before=[[Charles Stewart, 6th Duke of Lennox|The Duke of Richmond and Lennox]]|years=1673&ndash;1701|after=[[Charles Lennox, 1st Duke of Richmond|The Duke of Richmond and Lennox]]}}
{{succession box|title=[[Lord High Commissioner to the Parliament of Scotland]]|before=[[John Maitland, 1st Duke of Lauderdale|The Duke of Lauderdale]]|years=1680&ndash;1685|after=[[William Douglas, 1st Duke of Queensberry|The Duke of Queensberry]]}}
{{succession box|title=[[Lord High Admiral]]|before=[[Charles II of England|Charles II]]|after=[[William III of England|William III]]|years=1685&ndash;1688}}
{{succession box two to one|before1=New Creation|title1=[[Duke of York]]|years1=1644-1685|before2=New Creation|title2=[[Duke of Albany]]|years2=1660-1685|after=Merged in Crown}}
{{end box}}


|-
{{Persondata
| [[Catherine Sheffield, Duchess of Buckingham and Normanby|Catherine Darnley]]
|NAME=James II
| c. 1681
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES=Stuart, James
| 13 March 1743
|SHORT DESCRIPTION=King of England, King of Ireland, King of Scotland
| Alleged daughter. Married, firstly, [[James Annesley, 3rd Earl of Anglesey]] and had issue. Married, secondly, [[John Sheffield, 1st Duke of Buckingham and Normanby]] and had issue.<ref name="weir263">Weir, p. 263</ref>
|DATE OF BIRTH=[[October 14]], [[1633]]
|PLACE OF BIRTH=[[London]]
|DATE OF DEATH=[[September 5]], [[1701]]
|PLACE OF DEATH=[[Saint-Germain-en-Laye]], [[France]]
}}


|-
| James Darnley
| 1684
| 22 April 1685
|
|-
| Charles Darnley
|
|
| Died young<ref name="weir263"/>
|}

==Notes==
{{Notelist}}

==References==
{{reflist|20em}}

==Sources==
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ashley |first=Maurice |title=The Glorious Revolution of 1688 |date=1996 |publisher=Charles Scribner's Sons |isbn=0-340-00896-2 |authorlink=Maurice Ashley (historian)}}
* {{Cite book |last=Callow |first=John |title=The Making of King James II: The Formative Years of a King |date=2000 |publisher=Sutton |isbn=0-7509-2398-9}}
* {{Cite book |last=Devine |first=T. M. |title=The Scottish Nation 1700–2007 |date=2006 |publisher=Penguin |isbn=0-1410-2769-X |authorlink=Tom Devine}}
* {{Cite book |last=Harris |first=Tim |title=Revolution: The Great Crisis of the British Monarchy, 1685–1720 |date=2006 |publisher=Allen Lane |isbn=0-7139-9759-1 |authorlink=Timothy J. G. Harris}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hilliam |first=David |title=Kings, Queens, Bones & Bastards |date=1998 |publisher=Sutton |isbn=0-7509-3553-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Jones |first=J. R. |title=The Revolution of 1688 in England |date=1988 |publisher=Orion Publishing Group, Limited |isbn=0-2979-9467-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kenyon |first=J. P. |title=The Stuart Constitution 1603–1688, Documents and Commentary |date=1986 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-521-31327-9 |edition=2nd |authorlink=John Phillipps Kenyon}}
* {{Cite book |last=MacLeod |first=John |title=Dynasty, the Stuarts, 1560–1807 |date=1999 |publisher=Sceptre |isbn=0-3407-0767-4}}
* {{Cite book |last=Macaulay |first=Thomas Babington |title=[[The History of England from the Accession of James the Second]] |date=1889 |publisher=Longmans |edition=Popular in two volumes |authorlink=Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay}}
* {{Cite book |last=Mann |first=Alastair |title=James VII: Duke and King of Scots, 1633–1701 |date=2014 |publisher=John Donald |isbn=978-1-907-90909-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Miller |first=John |title=James II |date=2000 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=0-300-08728-4 |edition=3rd}}
* {{Citation |last=Ó Buachalla |first=Breandán |title=Aisling ghéar: na Stíobhartaigh agus an taos léinn, 1603–1788 |date=1996 |publisher=An Clóchomhar |language=Irish |isbn=0-903-75899-7 |authorlink=Breandán Ó Buachalla}}
* {{Citation |last=Ó Ciardha |first=Éamonn |title=Ireland and the Jacobite Cause, 1685–1766 |date=2002 |location=Dublin |publisher=Four Courts Press |isbn=1-851-82534-7 |authorlink=Éamonn Ó Ciardha}}
* {{Cite book |last=Prall |first=Stuart |title=The Bloodless Revolution: England, 1688 |date=1972 |publisher=Univ of Wisconsin Press |isbn=978-0-299-10294-4}}
* {{Cite book |last=Royle |first=Trevor |title=The British Civil Wars: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms, 1638–1660 |date=2004 |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=0-312-29293-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Sowerby |first=Scott |title=Making Toleration: The Repealers and the Glorious Revolution |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-674-07309-8}}
* {{Cite book |last=Turner |first=Francis C. |title=James II |date=1948 |publisher=Creative Media Partners, LLC |isbn=978-1-346-30578-3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Waller |first=Maureen |title=Ungrateful Daughters: The Stuart Princesses who Stole Their Father's Crown |date=2002 |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=0-312-30711-X}}
{{Refend}}

==Further reading==
* {{Cite book |last=Ashley |first=Maurice |date=1978 |title=James II |publisher=J.M. Dent & Sons |isbn=978-0-4601-2021-0 |url=https://archive.org/details/jamesii00maur}}
* DeKrey, Gary S. (2008). "Between Revolutions: Re-appraising the Restoration in Britain" ''History Compass'' 6 (3): 738–773.
* Earle, Peter (1972). ''The Life and Times of James II''. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.{{ISBN?}}
* Glassey, Lionel, ed. (1997). ''The Reigns of Charles II and James VII and II''. {{ISBN?}}
* Goodlad, Graham (2007). "Before the Glorious Revolution: The Making of Absolute Monarchy? Graham Goodlad Examines the Controversies Surrounding the Development of Royal Power under Charles II and James II" ''History Review'' 58: 10 ff.
* Johnson, Richard R. (1978). "Politics Redefined: An Assessment of Recent Writings on the Late Stuart Period of English History, 1660 to 1714." ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 35 (4): 691–732. {{doi|10.2307/1923211}}
* {{Cite book |last=Miller |first=John |date=1997 |title=The Glorious Revolution |publisher=Longman |edition=2nd |isbn=0-5822-9222-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Miller |first=John |date=2004 |title=The Stuarts |isbn=978-1-8528-5432-4}}
* Mullett, M. (1993). ''James II and English Politics 1678–1688''. {{ISBN|0-4150-9042-3}}.
* Ogg, David (1957). ''England in the Reigns of James II and William III'', 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
* {{Cite book |last=Speck |first=W. A. |title=James II |date=2002 |publisher=Longman |isbn=978-0-5822-8712-9 |authorlink=W. A. Speck}}
* Van der Kiste, John (2021). ''James II and the first modern revolution''. Barnsley: Pen & Sword. {{ISBN?}}
* Walcott, Robert (1962). "The Later Stuarts (1660–1714): Significant Work of the Last Twenty Years (1939–1959)" ''American Historical Review'' 67 (2): 352–370 {{doi|10.2307/1843428}}

==External links==
{{Sister project links|James II of England|wikt=no|n=no|v=no}}
* [https://www.royal.uk/james-vii-and-ii-r1685-1689 James VII & II] at the official website of the [[British monarchy]]
* [https://www.rct.uk/collection/people/james-ii-king-of-great-britain-1633-1701#/type/subject James II] at the official website of the [[Royal Collection Trust]]
* [https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/james_ii.shtml James II] at BBC History
* {{NPG name|name=King James II}}

{{S-start}}
{{S-hou|[[House of Stuart]]|14 October|1633|16 September|1701}}
{{S-reg}}
{{S-bef|before=[[Charles II of England|Charles II]]}}
{{S-ttl|title=[[King of England]], [[King of Scotland|Scotland]] and [[King of Ireland|Ireland]]|years=1685–1688}}
{{S-vac|next=[[William III & II]] and [[Mary II]]|reason=[[Glorious Revolution]]}}
{{S-hon}}
{{S-break}}
{{S-bef|before=[[Heneage Finch, 3rd Earl of Winchilsea]]}}
{{S-ttl|title=[[Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports]]|years=1660–1673}}
{{S-aft|after=[[John Beaumont (died 1701)|John Beaumont]]}}
{{S-off}}
{{S-break}}
{{S-vac|last=[[Francis Cottington, 1st Baron Cottington]]}}
{{S-ttl|title=[[Lord High Admiral of England]]|years=1660–1673}}
{{S-aft|after=[[Charles II of England|Charles II]]}}
{{S-bef|before=[[Charles Stewart, 6th Duke of Lennox]]}}
{{S-ttl|title=[[Lord High Admiral of Scotland]]|years=1673–1688}}
{{S-vac|next=[[William Hamilton, Duke of Hamilton]]}}
{{S-bef|before=[[John Maitland, 1st Duke of Lauderdale]]}}
{{S-ttl|title=[[Lord High Commissioner to the Parliament of Scotland|Lord High Commissioner to<br/>the Parliament of Scotland]]|years=1680–1685}}
{{S-aft|after=[[William Douglas, 1st Duke of Queensberry]]}}
{{S-bef|before=[[Charles II of England|Charles II]]}}
{{S-ttl|title=[[British Admiralty|Lord High Admiral]]|years=1685–1688}}
{{S-aft|after=[[William III of England|William III]]}}
{{S-pre}}
{{S-new|loss|reason=[[Glorious Revolution]]}}
{{S-tul|title=[[Jacobite succession|King of England, Scotland and Ireland]]|years=1688–1701}}
{{S-aft|after=''[[James Francis Edward Stuart|James III & VIII]]''}}
{{S-end}}

{{English, Scottish and British monarchs}}
{{Pictish and Scottish Monarchs}}
{{Dukes of Albany}}
{{Dukes of York}}
{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:James 02 Of England}}
[[Category:James II of England| ]]
[[Category:1633 births]]
[[Category:1633 births]]
[[Category:1701 deaths]]
[[Category:1701 deaths]]
[[Category:Londoners]]
[[Category:17th-century English monarchs]]
[[Category:17th-century Scottish monarchs]]
[[Category:17th-century Irish monarchs]]
[[Category:18th-century British people]]
[[Category:17th-century English nobility]]
[[Category:17th-century Scottish peers]]
[[Category:Dukes of Normandy]]
[[Category:Jacobite pretenders]]
[[Category:18th-century Jacobite pretenders]]
[[Category:British monarchs buried abroad|James II and VII]]
[[Category:English Roman Catholics]]
[[Category:Converts to Roman Catholicism from Anglicanism]]
[[Category:Dukes of York]]
[[Category:Peers of England created by Charles I]]
[[Category:Dukes of Albany|501]]
[[Category:Peers of Scotland created by Charles II]]
[[Category:Earls in the Peerage of Ireland|Ulster]]
[[Category:Earls of Ulster]]<!-- both this and preceding categories should be kept - there have been Earls of Ulster in the Peerage of the United Kingdom as well -->
[[Category:Peers of Ireland created by Charles II]]
[[Category:English pretenders to the French throne]]
[[Category:English people of Scottish descent]]
[[Category:English people of French descent]]
[[Category:Fellows of the Royal Society]]
[[Category:People of the Glorious Revolution]]
[[Category:Governors of the Hudson's Bay Company]]
[[Category:History of Catholicism in the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:House of Stuart]]
[[Category:House of Stuart]]
[[Category:Jacobite military personnel of the Williamite War in Ireland]]
[[Category:English monarchs]]
[[Category:Scottish monarchs]]
[[Category:Roman Catholic monarchs]]
[[Category:History of Roman Catholicism in Britain]]
[[Category:Lord High Admirals]]
[[Category:Knights of the Garter]]
[[Category:Knights of the Garter]]
[[Category:Lord High Admirals of England]]
[[Category:Lord High Admirals of Scotland]]
[[Category:Lords High Commissioner to the Parliament of Scotland]]
[[Category:Lords Warden of the Cinque Ports]]
[[Category:Lords Warden of the Cinque Ports]]
[[Category:Dukes of York]]
[[Category:Pre-statehood history of New York (state)]]
[[Category:Dukes in the Peerage of Scotland]]
[[Category:English princes]]
[[Category:Earls in the Peerage of Ireland]]
[[Category:Princes of Scotland]]
[[Category:Roman Catholic monarchs]]
[[CategoRY:Fellows of the Royal Society]]
[[Category:Monarchs of Canada]]
[[Category:Children of Charles I of England]]
[[Category:Sons of kings]]
<!---->
[[Category:Exiled royalty]]
{{English Monarchs}}
{{Scottish Monarchs}}
{{featured article}}

[[ar:جيمس الثاني من إنكلترا]]
[[cs:Jakub II.]]
[[cy:Iago II/VII o Loegr a'r Alban]]
[[da:Jakob 2. af England]]
[[de:Jakob II. (England)]]
[[es:Jacobo II de Inglaterra]]
[[eo:Jakobo la 2-a (Anglio)]]
[[fr:Jacques II d'Angleterre]]
[[it:Giacomo II d'Inghilterra]]
[[he:ג'יימס השני מלך אנגליה]]
[[kw:Jamys VII a Alban]]
[[la:Iacobus II Angliae Rex]]
[[hu:II. Jakab angol király]]
[[nl:Jacobus II van Engeland]]
[[ja:ジェームズ2世 (イングランド王)]]
[[pl:Jakub II Stuart]]
[[pt:Jaime II de Inglaterra]]
[[ru:Иаков II (король Англии)]]
[[sk:Jakub II. (Anglicko)]]
[[fi:Jaakko II (Englanti)]]
[[sv:Jakob II av England]]
[[uk:Джеймс ІІ (король Англії)]]
[[zh:詹姆斯二世 (英国)]]
'''Bold text'''

Latest revision as of 15:46, 16 May 2024

James VII and II
Portrait by Peter Lely
King of England, Scotland and Ireland
Reign6 February 1685 – 23 December 1688
Coronation23 April 1685
PredecessorCharles II
SuccessorsMary II and William III & II
Born14 October 1633
(N.S.: 24 October 1633)
St James's Palace, Westminster, England
Died16 September 1701 (aged 67)[a] (N.S.)
Château de Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France
Burial
Church of the English Benedictines, Paris[1][b]
Spouses
(m. 1660; died 1671)
(m. 1673)
Issue
more...
Illegitimate:
HouseStuart
FatherCharles I of England
MotherHenrietta Maria of France
Religion
SignatureJames VII and II's signature

James VII and II (14 October 1633 O.S. – 16 September 1701)[a] was King of England and Ireland as James II and King of Scotland as James VII[4] from the death of his elder brother, Charles II, on 6 February 1685. He was deposed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. He was the last Catholic monarch of England, Scotland, and Ireland. His reign is now remembered primarily for conflicts over religious tolerance, but it also involved struggles over the principles of absolutism and the divine right of kings. His deposition ended a century of political and civil strife in England by confirming the primacy of the English Parliament over the Crown.[5]

James succeeded to the thrones of England, Ireland and Scotland following the death of his brother, with widespread support in all three countries, largely because the principles of eligibility based on divine right and birth were widely accepted.[6] Tolerance of his personal Catholicism did not extend to tolerance of Catholicism in general, and the English and Scottish parliaments refused to pass his measures. His attempts then to impose them by decree met with opposition; some have argued that it was a political principle, rather than a religious one, that ultimately led to his removal.[7]

In June 1688, two events turned dissent into a crisis. Firstly, the birth of James's son and heir James Francis Edward Stuart on 10 June raised the prospect of establishing a Catholic dynasty and excluding his Anglican daughter Mary and her Protestant husband William III, Prince of Orange, who was also his nephew, from the line of succession. Secondly, the prosecution of the Seven Bishops for seditious libel was viewed as further evidence of an assault on the Church of England, and their acquittal on 30 June destroyed his political authority in England. The ensuing anti-Catholic riots in England and Scotland led to a general feeling that only James's removal from the throne could prevent another civil war.[8]

Leading members of the English political class invited William of Orange to assume the English throne. When William landed in Brixham on 5 November 1688, James's army deserted and he went into exile in France on 23 December. In February 1689, a special Convention Parliament held that James had "vacated" the English throne and installed William and Mary as joint monarchs, thereby establishing the principle that sovereignty derived from Parliament, not birth. James landed in Ireland on 14 March 1689 in an attempt to recover his kingdoms, but, despite a simultaneous rising in Scotland, in April a Scottish Convention followed that of England, both finding that James had "forfeited" the throne and offered it to William and Mary. After his defeat at the Battle of the Boyne in July 1690, James returned to France, where he spent the rest of his life in exile at Saint-Germain, protected by Louis XIV. While his contemporary opponents often portrayed him as an absolutist tyrant, some historians—beginning in the 20th century—have praised James for advocating religious tolerance. More recent scholarship has tended to take a middle ground between these views.

Early life[edit]

Birth[edit]

James with his father, Charles I, by Sir Peter Lely, 1647

James, the second surviving son of King Charles I and his wife, Henrietta Maria of France, was born at St James's Palace in London on 14 October 1633.[9] Later that same year, he was baptized by William Laud, the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury.[10] He was educated by private tutors, along with his older brother, the future King Charles II, and the two sons of the Duke of Buckingham, George and Francis Villiers.[11] At the age of three, James was appointed Lord High Admiral; the position was initially honorary, but became a substantive office after the Restoration, when James was an adult.[12] He was designated Duke of York at birth,[13] invested with the Order of the Garter in 1642,[14] and formally created Duke of York in January 1644.[10][13]

Wars of the Three Kingdoms[edit]

In August 1642, long running political disputes between Charles I and his opponents in Parliament led to the First English Civil War. James and his brother Charles were present at the Battle of Edgehill in October, and narrowly escaped capture by Parliamentarian cavalry.[15] He spent most of the next four years in the Royalist wartime capital of Oxford,[15][16] where he was made a Master of Arts by the University on 1 November 1642 and served as colonel of a volunteer regiment of foot.[17] Following the surrender of Oxford in June 1646, James was taken to London and held with his younger siblings Henry, Elizabeth and Henrietta in St James's Palace.[18]

Frustrated by their inability to agree terms with Charles I, and with his brother Charles out of reach in France, Parliament considered making James king. James was ordered by his father to escape, and, with the help of Joseph Bampfield, in April 1648 successfully evaded his guards and crossed the North Sea to The Hague.[19] Following their victory in the 1648 Second English Civil War, Parliament ordered the execution of Charles I in January 1649.[20] The Covenanter regime proclaimed Charles II King of Scotland, and after lengthy negotiations agreed to provide troops to restore him to the English throne. The invasion ended in defeat at Worcester in September 1651. Although Charles managed to escape capture and to return to the exiled court in Paris, the Royalist cause appeared hopeless.[21]

Exile in France[edit]

Henri de La Tour d'Auvergne, Viscount of Turenne, James's commander in France

James, like his brother, sought refuge in France, serving in the French army under Turenne against the Fronde, and later against their Spanish allies.[22] In the French army James had his first true experience of battle, in which, according to one observer, he "ventures himself and chargeth gallantly where anything is to be done".[22] Turenne's favour led to James being given command of a captured Irish regiment in December 1652, and being appointed Lieutenant-General in 1654.[23]

In the meantime, Charles was attempting to reclaim his throne, but France, although hosting the exiles, had allied itself with Oliver Cromwell. In 1656, Charles turned instead to Spain—an enemy of France—for support, and an alliance was made. In consequence, James was expelled from France and forced to leave Turenne's army.[24] James quarrelled with his brother over the diplomatic choice of Spain over France. Exiled and poor, there was little that either Charles or James could do about the wider political situation, and James ultimately travelled to Bruges and (along with his younger brother, Henry) joined the Spanish army under the Prince of Condé in Flanders, where he was given command as Captain-General of six regiments of British volunteers[23] and fought against his former French comrades at the Battle of the Dunes.[25]

During his service in the Spanish army, James became friendly with two Irish Catholic brothers in the Royalist entourage, Peter and Richard Talbot, and became somewhat estranged from his brother's Anglican advisers.[26] In 1659, the French and Spanish made peace by the Treaty of the Pyrenees. James, doubtful of his brother's chances of regaining the throne, considered taking a Spanish offer to be an admiral in their navy.[27] Ultimately, he declined the position; by the next year the situation in England had changed, and Charles II was proclaimed King.[28]

Restoration[edit]

First marriage[edit]

James and Anne Hyde in the 1660s, by Sir Peter Lely

After the collapse of the Commonwealth in 1660, Charles II was restored to the thrones of England, Ireland and Scotland. Although James was the heir presumptive, it seemed unlikely that he would inherit the Crown, as Charles was still a young man capable of fathering children.[29] On 31 December 1660, following his brother's restoration, James was created Duke of Albany in Scotland, to go along with his English title, Duke of York.[30] Upon his return to England, James prompted an immediate controversy by announcing his engagement to Anne Hyde, the daughter of Charles's chief minister, Edward Hyde.[31]

In 1659, while trying to seduce her, James promised he would marry Anne.[32] Anne became pregnant in 1660, but following the Restoration and James's return to power, no one at the royal court expected a prince to marry a commoner, no matter what he had pledged beforehand.[33] Although nearly everyone, including Anne's father, urged the two not to marry, the couple married secretly, then went through an official marriage ceremony on 3 September 1660 in London.[33]

The couple's first child, Charles, was born less than two months later, but died in infancy, as did five further children.[33] Only two daughters survived: Mary (born 30 April 1662) and Anne (born 6 February 1665).[34] Samuel Pepys wrote that James was fond of his children and his role as a father, and played with them "like an ordinary private father of a child", a contrast to the distant parenting common with royalty at the time.[35][36]

James's wife was devoted to him and influenced many of his decisions.[37] Even so, he kept mistresses, including Arabella Churchill and Catherine Sedley, and was reputed to be "the most unguarded ogler of his time".[36] Samuel Pepys recorded in his diary that James "did eye my wife mightily".[36] James's taste in women was often maligned, with Gilbert Burnet famously remarking that James's mistresses must have been "given [to] him by his priests as a penance".[38] Anne Hyde died in 1671.

Military and political offices and royal slavery[edit]

James in the 1660s by John Riley
Settlement on Duke of York Act 1663
Act of Parliament
Long titleAn Act for setling the Proffitts of the Post Office and Power of graunting Wyne Lycences on his Royall Highnes the Duke of Yorke and the Heires Males of his Body.
Citation15 Cha. 2. c. 14
Dates
Royal assent27 July 1663
Commencement18 February 1663
Repealed28 July 1863
Other legislation
Amended byPost Office Revenues Act 1670
Repealed byStatute Law Revision Act 1863
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted
Post Office Revenues Act 1670
Act of Parliament
Long titleAn Act for explaining of a Proviso conteyned in an Act, entituled "An Act for settling the Profitts of ye Post-Office and Power of granteing Wine-Licences on His Royall Highnes ye Duke of Yorke and the Heyres Males of his Body."
Citation22 & 23 Cha. 2. c. 27
Dates
Royal assent22 April 1671
Other legislation
AmendsSettlement on Duke of York Act 1663
Repealed byStatute Law Revision Act 1863
Status: Repealed

After the Restoration, James was confirmed as Lord High Admiral, an office that carried with it the subsidiary appointments of Governor of Portsmouth and Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports.[39] Charles II also made his brother the Governor of the Royal Adventurers into Africa (later shortened to the Royal African Company) in October 1660, an office James retained until after the Glorious Revolution when he was forced to resign. When James commanded the Royal Navy during the Second Anglo-Dutch War (1665–1667) he immediately directed the fleet towards the capture of forts off the African coast that would facilitate English involvement in the slave trade (indeed English attacks on such forts occupied by the Dutch precipitated the war itself).[40] James remained Admiral of the Fleet during the Third Anglo-Dutch War (1672–1674), during which significant fighting also occurred off the African coast.[41] Following the raid on the Medway in 1667, James oversaw the survey and re-fortification of the southern coast.[42] The office of Lord High Admiral, combined with his revenue from post office and wine tariffs (positions granted him by Charles II upon his restoration), gave James enough money to keep a sizable court household.[43]

In 1664, Charles II granted American territory between the Delaware and Connecticut rivers to James. Following its capture by the British, the former Dutch territory of New Netherland and its principal port, New Amsterdam, were renamed the Province and City of New York in James's honour. James gave part of the colony to proprietors George Carteret and John Berkeley. Fort Orange, 150 miles (240 km) north on the Hudson River, was renamed Albany after James's Scottish title.[33] In 1683, James became the Governor of the Hudson's Bay Company, but did not take an active role in its governance.[33]

In September 1666, Charles II put James in charge of firefighting operations during the Great Fire of London, in the absence of action by Lord Mayor Thomas Bloodworth. This was not a political office, but his actions and leadership were noteworthy. "The Duke of York hath won the hearts of the people with his continual and indefatigable pains day and night in helping to quench the Fire", wrote a witness in a letter on 8 September.[44]

In 1672, the Royal African Company received a new charter from Charles II. It set up forts and factories, maintained troops, and exercised martial law in West Africa in pursuit of trade in gold, silver and African slaves. In the 1680s, the RAC transported about 5,000 slaves a year to markets primarily in the English Caribbean across the Atlantic. Many were branded on the chest with the letters "DY" for "Duke of York", the RAC's Governor.[45] As historian William Pettigrew writes, the RAC "shipped more enslaved African women, men, and children to the Americas than any other single institution during the entire period of the transatlantic slave trade".[46]

Conversion to Roman Catholicism and second marriage[edit]

Wedding suit of James II, 1673, in the Victoria and Albert Museum

James's time in France had exposed him to the beliefs and ceremonies of the Roman Catholic Church, and both he and his wife Anne became drawn to that faith.[47][c] James took Catholic Eucharist in 1668 or 1669, although his conversion was kept secret for almost a decade as he continued to attend Anglican services until 1676.[49] In spite of his conversion, James continued to associate primarily with Anglicans, including John Churchill and George Legge, as well as French Protestants such as Louis de Duras, 2nd Earl of Feversham.[50]

Growing fears of Roman Catholic influence at court led the English Parliament to introduce a new Test Act in 1673.[51] Under this Act, all civil and military officials were required to take an oath (in which they were required to disavow the doctrine of transubstantiation and denounce certain practices of the Roman Church as superstitious and idolatrous) and to receive the Eucharist under the auspices of the Church of England.[52] James refused to perform either action, instead choosing to relinquish the post of Lord High Admiral. His conversion to Roman Catholicism was thereby made public.[51]

King Charles II opposed James's conversion, ordering that James's daughters, Mary and Anne, be raised in the Church of England.[53] Nevertheless, he allowed the widowed James to marry Mary of Modena, a fifteen-year-old Italian princess.[54] James and Mary were married by proxy in a Roman Catholic ceremony on 20 September 1673.[55] On 21 November, Mary arrived in England and Nathaniel Crew, Bishop of Oxford, performed a brief Anglican service that did little more than recognise the marriage by proxy.[56] Many British people, distrustful of Catholicism, regarded the new Duchess of York as an agent of the Papacy.[57] James was noted for his deep devotion, once remarking, "If occasion were, I hope God would give me his grace to suffer death for the true Catholic religion as well as banishment."[58]

Exclusion Crisis[edit]

In 1677, King Charles II arranged for James's daughter Mary to marry the Protestant Prince William III of Orange, son of Charles's and James's sister Mary. James reluctantly acquiesced after his brother and nephew had agreed to the marriage.[59][d] Despite the Protestant marriage, fears of a potential Catholic monarch persisted, intensified by the failure of Charles II and his wife, Catherine of Braganza, to produce any children. A defrocked Anglican clergyman, Titus Oates, spoke of a "Popish Plot" to kill Charles and to put the Duke of York on the throne.[61] The fabricated plot caused a wave of anti-Catholic hysteria to sweep across the nation.

The Duke of Monmouth was involved in plots against James.

In England, the Earl of Shaftesbury, a former government minister and now a leading opponent of Catholicism, proposed an Exclusion Bill that would have excluded James from the line of succession.[62] Some members of Parliament even proposed to pass the crown to Charles's illegitimate son, James Scott, 1st Duke of Monmouth.[63] In 1679, with the Exclusion Bill in danger of passing, Charles II dissolved Parliament.[64] Two further Parliaments were elected in 1680 and 1681, but were dissolved for the same reason.[65] The Exclusion Crisis contributed to the development of the English two-party system: the Whigs were those who supported the Bill, while the Tories were those who opposed it. Ultimately, the succession was not altered, but James was convinced to withdraw from all policy-making bodies and to accept a lesser role in his brother's government.[66]

On the orders of the King, James left England for Brussels.[67] In 1680, he was appointed Lord High Commissioner of Scotland and took up residence at the Holyrood Palace in Edinburgh to suppress an uprising and oversee the royal government.[68] James returned to England for a time when Charles was stricken ill and appeared to be near death.[69] The hysteria of the accusations eventually faded, but James's relations with many in the English Parliament, including the Earl of Danby, a former ally, were forever strained and a solid segment turned against him.[70]

On 6 May 1682, James narrowly escaped the sinking of HMS Gloucester, in which between 130 and 250 people perished.[71] James argued with the pilot about the navigation of the ship before it ran aground on a sandbank, and then delayed abandoning ship, which may have contributed to the death toll.[72]

Return to favour[edit]

In 1683, a plot was uncovered to assassinate Charles II and his brother and spark a republican revolution to re-establish a government of the Cromwellian style.[73] The conspiracy, known as the Rye House Plot, backfired upon its conspirators and provoked a wave of sympathy for the King and James.[74] Several notable Whigs, including the Earl of Essex and the Duke of Monmouth, were implicated.[73] Monmouth initially confessed to complicity in the plot and implicated fellow conspirators, but later recanted.[73] Essex committed suicide, and Monmouth, along with several others, was obliged to flee into exile in continental Europe.[75] Charles II reacted to the plot by increasing the repression of Whigs and dissenters.[73] Taking advantage of James's rebounding popularity, Charles invited him back onto the Privy Council in 1684.[76] While some in the English Parliament remained wary of the possibility of a Roman Catholic king, the threat of excluding James from the throne had passed.

Reign[edit]

Accession to the throne[edit]

Coronation procession of King James II and Queen Mary, 1685

Charles II died on 6 February 1685 from apoplexy, after supposedly converting to Catholicism on his deathbed.[77] Having no legitimate children, he was succeeded by his brother James, who reigned in England and Ireland as James II and in Scotland as James VII. There was little initial opposition to James's accession, and there were widespread reports of public rejoicing at the orderly succession.[78] He wished to proceed quickly to the coronation, and he and Mary were crowned at Westminster Abbey on 23 April 1685.[79]

The new Parliament that assembled in May 1685, which gained the name of "Loyal Parliament", was initially favourable to James, who had stated that most former exclusionists would be forgiven if they acquiesced to his rule.[78] Most of Charles's officers continued in office, the exceptions being the promotion of James's brothers-in-law, the earls of Clarendon and Rochester, and the demotion of Halifax.[80] Parliament granted James a generous life income, including all of the proceeds of tonnage and poundage and the customs duties.[81] James worked harder as king than his brother had, but was less willing to compromise when his advisers disagreed with his policies.[82]

Two rebellions[edit]

James portrayed c. 1685 in his role as head of the army, wearing a general officer's state coat

Soon after becoming king, James faced a rebellion in southern England led by his nephew, the Duke of Monmouth, and another rebellion in Scotland led by Archibald Campbell, 9th Earl of Argyll.[83] Monmouth and Argyll both began their expeditions from Holland, where James's nephew and son-in-law, the Prince of Orange, had neglected to detain them or put a stop to their recruitment efforts.[84]

Argyll sailed to Scotland where he raised recruits, mainly from his own clan, the Campbells.[85] The rebellion was quickly crushed, and Argyll was captured at Inchinnan on 18 June 1685.[85] Having arrived with fewer than 300 men and unable to convince many more to flock to his standard, he never posed a credible threat to James.[86] Argyll was taken as a prisoner to Edinburgh. A new trial was not commenced because Argyll had previously been tried and sentenced to death. The King confirmed the earlier death sentence and ordered that it be carried out within three days of receiving the confirmation.

Monmouth's rebellion was coordinated with Argyll's, but was more dangerous to James. Monmouth had proclaimed himself King at Lyme Regis on 11 June.[87] He attempted to raise recruits but was unable to gather enough rebels to defeat even James's small standing army.[88] Monmouth's soldiers attacked the King's army at night, in an attempt at surprise, but were defeated at the Battle of Sedgemoor.[88] The King's forces, led by Feversham and Churchill, quickly dispersed the ill-prepared rebels.[88] Monmouth was captured and later executed at the Tower of London on 15 July.[89] The King's judges—most notably, George Jeffreys—condemned many of the rebels to transportation and indentured servitude in the West Indies in a series of trials that came to be known as the Bloody Assizes.[90] Around 250 of the rebels were executed.[89] While both rebellions were defeated easily, they hardened James's resolve against his enemies and increased his suspicion of the Dutch.[91]

Religious liberty and dispensing power[edit]

To protect himself from further rebellions, James sought safety by enlarging his standing army.[92] This alarmed his subjects, not only because of the trouble soldiers caused in the towns, but because it was against the English tradition to keep a professional army in peacetime.[93] Even more alarming to Parliament was James's use of his dispensing power to allow Roman Catholics to command several regiments without having to take the oath mandated by the Test Act.[92] When even the previously supportive Parliament objected to these measures, James ordered Parliament prorogued in November 1685, never to meet again in his reign.[94] At the beginning of 1686, two papers were found in Charles II's strong box and his closet, in his own hand, stating the arguments for Catholicism over Protestantism. James published these papers with a declaration signed by his sign manual and challenged the Archbishop of Canterbury and the whole Anglican episcopal bench to refute Charles's arguments: "Let me have a solid answer, and in a gentlemanlike style; and it may have the effect which you so much desire of bringing me over to your church." The Archbishop refused on the grounds of respect for the late king.[95]

Laurence Hyde, 1st Earl of Rochester, once a supporter of James, turned against him by 1688.

James advocated repeal of the penal laws in all three of his kingdoms, but in the early years of his reign he refused to allow those dissenters who did not petition for relief to receive it.[e][96] James sent a letter to the Scottish Parliament at its opening in 1685, declaring his wish for new penal laws against refractory Presbyterians and lamented that he was not there in person to promote such a law. In response, the Parliament passed an Act that stated, "whoever should preach in a conventicle under a roof, or should attend, either as preacher or as a hearer, a conventicle in the open air, should be punished with death and confiscation of property".[97] In March 1686, James sent a letter to the Scottish Privy Council advocating toleration for Roman Catholics but not for rebellious Presbyterian Covenanters.[98] Presbyterians would later call this period "The Killing Time".

James allowed Roman Catholics to occupy the highest offices of his kingdoms, and received at his court the papal nuncio, Ferdinando d'Adda, the first representative from Rome to London since the reign of Mary I.[99] Edward Petre, James's Jesuit confessor, was a particular object of Anglican ire.[100] When the King's Secretary of State, the Earl of Sunderland, began replacing office-holders at court with "Papist" favourites, James began to lose the confidence of many of his Anglican supporters.[101] Sunderland's purge of office-holders even extended to the King's brothers-in-law (the Hydes) and their supporters.[101] Roman Catholics made up no more than one-fiftieth of the English population.[102] In May 1686, James sought to obtain a ruling from the English common-law courts that showed he had the power to dispense with Acts of Parliament. He dismissed judges who disagreed with him on this matter, as well as the Solicitor General, Heneage Finch.[103] The case of Godden v Hales affirmed his dispensing power,[104] with eleven out of the twelve judges ruling in the king's favour after six judges were dismissed for refusing to promise to support the king.[105][106]

In 1687, James issued the Declaration of Indulgence, also known as the Declaration for Liberty of Conscience, in which he used his dispensing power to negate the effect of laws punishing both Roman Catholics and Protestant Dissenters.[107] In the summer of 1687 he attempted to increase support for his tolerationist policy by a speaking tour of the western counties of England. As part of this tour, he gave a speech at Chester in which he said, "suppose... there should be a law made that all black men should be imprisoned, it would be unreasonable and we had as little reason to quarrel with other men for being of different [religious] opinions as for being of different complexions."[108] At the same time, James provided partial toleration in Scotland, using his dispensing power to grant relief to Roman Catholics and partial relief to Presbyterians.[109]

1686 statue of James II by Peter Van Dievoet in Trafalgar Square, London

In 1688, James ordered the Declaration read from the pulpits of every Anglican church, further alienating the Anglican bishops against the Supreme Governor of their church.[110] While the Declaration elicited some thanks from its beneficiaries, it left the Established Church, the traditional ally of the monarchy, in the difficult position of being forced to erode its own privileges.[110] James provoked further opposition by attempting to reduce the Anglican monopoly on education.[111] At the University of Oxford, he offended Anglicans by allowing Roman Catholics to hold important positions in Christ Church and University College, two of Oxford's largest colleges. He also attempted to force the Fellows of Magdalen College to elect as their President Anthony Farmer, a man of generally ill repute who was believed to be a Roman Catholic,[f] which was seen as a violation of the Fellows' right to elect someone of their own choosing.[111]

In 1687, James prepared to pack Parliament with his supporters, so that it would repeal the Test Act and the Penal Laws. James was convinced by addresses from Dissenters that he had their support and so could dispense with relying on Tories and Anglicans. He instituted a wholesale purge of those in offices under the Crown opposed to his plan, appointing new lord-lieutenants of counties and remodelling the corporations governing towns and livery companies.[116] In October, James gave orders for the lord-lieutenants to provide three standard questions to all Justices of the Peace: 1. Would they consent to the repeal of the Test Act and the Penal Laws? 2. Would they assist candidates who would do so? 3. Would they accept the Declaration of Indulgence? During the first three months of 1688, hundreds of those who gave negative replies to those questions were dismissed.[117] Corporations were purged by agents, known as the Regulators, who were given wide discretionary powers, in an attempt to create a permanent royal electoral machine.[118] Most of the regulators were Baptists, and the new town officials that they recommended included Quakers, Baptists, Congregationalists, Presbyterians and Roman Catholics, as well as Anglicans.[119] Finally, on 24 August 1688, James ordered the issue of writs for a general election.[120] However, upon realising in September that William of Orange was going to land in England, James withdrew the writs and subsequently wrote to the lord-lieutenants to inquire over allegations of abuses committed during the regulations and election preparations, as part of the concessions he made to win support.[121]

Deposition and the Glorious Revolution[edit]

James's nephew and son-in-law, William of Orange, was invited to "save the Protestant religion".

In April 1688, James re-issued the Declaration of Indulgence, subsequently ordering Anglican clergy to read it in their churches.[122] When seven bishops, including the Archbishop of Canterbury, submitted a petition requesting the reconsideration of the King's religious policies, they were arrested and tried for seditious libel.[123] Public alarm increased when Queen Mary gave birth to a Roman Catholic son and heir, James Francis Edward, on 10 June that year.[124] When James's only possible successors were his two Protestant daughters, Anglicans could see his pro-Catholic policies as a temporary phenomenon, but when the prince's birth opened the possibility of a permanent Roman Catholic dynasty, such men had to reconsider their position.[125] Threatened by a Roman Catholic dynasty, several influential Protestants claimed the child was supposititious and had been smuggled into the Queen's bedchamber in a warming pan.[126] They had already entered into negotiations with the Prince of Orange when it became known the Queen was pregnant, and the birth of a son reinforced their convictions.[127]

Louis XIV greeting the exiled James II in 1689 ("La Reception faite au Roy d'Angleterre par le Roy à St. Germain en Laye le VIIe janvier 1689", engraving by Nicolas Langlois, 1690)

On 30 June 1688, a group of seven Protestant nobles invited William, Prince of Orange, to come to England with an army.[128] By September, it had become clear that William sought to invade.[129] Believing that his own army would be adequate, James refused the assistance of King Louis XIV of France, fearing that the English would oppose French intervention.[129] When William arrived on 5 November 1688, many Protestant officers, including Churchill, defected and joined William, as did James's own daughter Anne.[130] James lost his nerve and declined to attack the invading army, despite his army's numerical superiority.[131] On 11 December, James tried to flee to France, first throwing the Great Seal of the Realm into the River Thames.[132] He was captured in Kent; later, he was released and placed under Dutch protective guard. Having no desire to make James a martyr, William let him escape on 23 December.[132] James was received by his cousin and ally, Louis XIV, who offered him a palace and a pension.

William summoned a Convention Parliament to decide how to handle James's flight. It convened on 22 January 1689.[133] While the Parliament refused to depose him, they declared that James, having fled to France and dropped the Great Seal into the Thames, had effectively abdicated, and that the throne had thereby become vacant.[134][g] To fill this vacancy, James's daughter Mary was declared Queen; she was to rule jointly with her husband William, who would be King. On 11 April 1689, the Parliament of Scotland declared James to have forfeited the throne of Scotland as well.[136] The Convention Parliament issued a Declaration of Right on 12 February that denounced James for abusing his power, and proclaimed many limitations on royal authority. The abuses charged to James included the suspension of the Test Acts, the prosecution of the Seven Bishops for merely petitioning the Crown, the establishment of a standing army, and the imposition of cruel punishments.[137] The Declaration was the basis for the Bill of Rights enacted later in 1689. The Bill also declared that henceforth, no Roman Catholic was permitted to ascend the English throne, nor could any English monarch marry a Roman Catholic.[138]

Attempt to regain the throne[edit]

War in Ireland[edit]

Battle of the Boyne between James II and William III, 11 July 1690 by Huchtenburg

With the assistance of French troops, James landed in Ireland in March 1689.[139] The Irish Parliament did not follow the example of the English Parliament; it declared that James remained King and passed a massive bill of attainder against those who had rebelled against him.[140] At James's urging, the Irish Parliament passed an Act for Liberty of Conscience that granted religious freedom to all Roman Catholics and Protestants in Ireland.[141] James worked to build an army in Ireland, but was ultimately defeated at the Battle of the Boyne on 1 July 1690 O.S. when William arrived, personally leading an army to defeat James and reassert English control.[142] James fled to France once more, departing from Kinsale, never to return to any of his former kingdoms.[142] Because he deserted his Irish supporters, James became known in Ireland as Séamus an Chaca or "James the shit".[143] Despite this popular perception, later historian Breandán Ó Buachalla argues that "Irish political poetry for most of the eighteenth century is essentially Jacobite poetry",[144] and both Ó Buachalla and fellow-historian Éamonn Ó Ciardha argue that James and his successors played a central role as messianic figures throughout the 18th century for all classes in Ireland.[145]

Return to exile, death and legacy[edit]

The Château de Saint-Germain-en-Laye, James's home during his final exile
Tomb of James II & VII in the parish church of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, commissioned in 1828 by George IV when the church was rebuilt

In France, James was allowed to live in the royal château of Saint-Germain-en-Laye.[146] James's wife and some of his supporters fled with him, including the Earl of Melfort; most, but not all, were Roman Catholic.[147] In 1692, James's last child, Louisa Maria Teresa, was born.[148] Some supporters in England attempted to assassinate William III to restore James to the throne in 1696, but the plot failed and the backlash made James's cause less popular.[149] In the same year, Louis XIV offered to have James elected King of Poland. James rejected the offer, fearing that accepting the Polish crown might (in the minds of the English people) disqualify him from being King of England. After Louis concluded peace with William in 1697, he ceased to offer much assistance to James.[150]

During his last years, James lived as an austere penitent.[151] He wrote a memorandum for his son advising him on how to govern England, specifying that Catholics should possess one Secretary of State, one Commissioner of the Treasury, the Secretary at War, with the majority of the officers in the army.[152]

James died aged 67 of a brain haemorrhage on 16 September 1701 at Saint-Germain-en-Laye.[153] James's heart was placed in a silver-gilt locket and given to the convent at Chaillot, and his brain was placed in a lead casket and given to the Scots College in Paris. His entrails were placed in two gilt urns and sent to the parish church of Saint-Germain-en-Laye and the English Jesuit college at Saint-Omer, while the flesh from his right arm was given to the English Augustinian nuns of Paris.[154]

The rest of James's body was laid to rest in a triple sarcophagus (consisting of two wooden coffins and one of lead) at the St Edmund's Chapel in the Church of the English Benedictines in the Rue Saint-Jacques, Paris, with a funeral oration by Henri-Emmanuel de Roquette.[1] James was not buried, but put in one of the side chapels. Lights were kept burning round his coffin until the French Revolution. In 1734, the Archbishop of Paris heard evidence to support James's canonisation, but nothing came of it.[1] During the French Revolution, James's tomb was raided.[1][b]

Later Hanover succession[edit]

James's son was known as "James III and VIII" to his supporters, and "The Old Pretender" to his enemies.

James's younger daughter Anne succeeded when William died in 1702. The Act of Settlement provided that, if the line of succession established in the Bill of Rights were extinguished, the crown would go to a German cousin, Sophia, Electress of Hanover, and to her Protestant heirs.[157] Sophia was a granddaughter of James VI and I through his eldest daughter, Elizabeth Stuart, the sister of Charles I. Thus, when Anne died in 1714 (less than two months after the death of Sophia), she was succeeded by George I, Sophia's son, the Elector of Hanover and Anne's second cousin.[157]

Subsequent uprisings and pretenders[edit]

James's son James Francis Edward was recognised as king at his father's death by Louis XIV of France and James II's remaining supporters (later known as Jacobites) as "James III and VIII".[158] He led a rising in Scotland in 1715 shortly after George I's accession, but was defeated.[159] His son Charles Edward Stuart led a Jacobite rising in 1745, but was again defeated.[160] The risings were the last serious attempts to restore the Stuart dynasty.

Charles's claims passed to his younger brother Henry Benedict Stuart, the Dean of the College of Cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church.[161] Henry was the last of James II's legitimate descendants, and no relative has publicly acknowledged the Jacobite claim since his death in 1807.[162]

Historiography[edit]

Macaulay wrote in the Whig tradition.
Belloc was a notable apologist for James II.

Historical analysis of James II has been somewhat revised since Whig historians, led by Lord Macaulay, cast James as a cruel absolutist and his reign as "tyranny which approached to insanity".[163] Subsequent scholars, such as G. M. Trevelyan (Macaulay's great-nephew) and David Ogg, while more balanced than Macaulay, still characterised James as a tyrant, his attempts at religious tolerance as a fraud, and his reign as an aberration in the course of British history.[164] In 1892, A. W. Ward wrote for the Dictionary of National Biography that James was "obviously a political and religious bigot", although never devoid of "a vein of patriotic sentiment"; "his conversion to the church of Rome made the emancipation of his fellow-catholics in the first instance, and the recovery of England for catholicism in the second, the governing objects of his policy."[165]

Hilaire Belloc, a writer and Catholic apologist, broke with this tradition in 1928, casting James as an honourable man and a true advocate for freedom of conscience, and his enemies "men in the small clique of great fortunes ... which destroyed the ancient monarchy of the English".[166] However, he observed that James "concluded the Catholic church to be the sole authoritative voice on earth, and thenceforward ... he not only stood firm against surrender but on no single occasion contemplated the least compromise or by a word would modify the impression made."

By the 1960s and 1970s, Maurice Ashley and Stuart Prall began to reconsider James's motives in granting religious toleration, while still taking note of James's autocratic rule.[167][168] Modern historians have moved away from the school of thought that preached the continuous march of progress and democracy, Ashley contending that "history is, after all, the story of human beings and individuals, as well as of the classes and the masses."[169] He cast James II and William III as "men of ideals as well as human weaknesses".[169] John Miller, writing in 2000, accepted the claims of James's absolutism, but argued that "his main concern was to secure religious liberty and civil equality for Catholics. Any 'absolutist' methods ... were essentially means to that end."[170]

In 2004, W. A. Speck wrote in the new Oxford Dictionary of National Biography that "James was genuinely committed to religious toleration, but also sought to increase the power of the crown."[171] He added that, unlike the government of the Netherlands, "James was too autocratic to combine freedom of conscience with popular government. He resisted any check on the monarch's power. That is why his heart was not in the concessions he had to make in 1688. He would rather live in exile with his principles intact than continue to reign as a limited monarch."[171]

Tim Harris's conclusions from his 2006 book summarised the ambivalence of modern scholarship towards James II:

The jury will doubtless remain out on James for a long time ... Was he an egotistical bigot ... a tyrant who rode roughshod over the will of the vast majority of his subjects (at least in England and Scotland) ... simply naïve, or even perhaps plain stupid, unable to appreciate the realities of political power ... Or was he a well-intentioned and even enlightened ruler—an enlightened despot well ahead of his time, perhaps—who was merely trying to do what he thought was best for his subjects?[172]

In 2009, Steven Pincus confronted that scholarly ambivalence in 1688: The First Modern Revolution. Pincus claims that James's reign must be understood within a context of economic change and European politics, and makes two major assertions about James II. The first of these is that James purposefully "followed the French Sun King, Louis XIV, in trying to create a modern Catholic polity. This involved not only trying to Catholicize England ... but also creating a modern, centralizing, and extremely bureaucratic state apparatus."[173] The second is that James was undone in 1688 far less by Protestant reaction against Catholicization than by nationwide hostile reaction against his intrusive bureaucratic state and taxation apparatus, expressed in massive popular support for William of Orange's armed invasion of England. Pincus presents James as neither naïve nor stupid nor egotistical. Instead, readers are shown an intelligent, clear-thinking strategically motivated monarch whose vision for a French authoritarian political model and alliance clashed with, and lost out to, alternative views that favoured an entrepreneurial Dutch economic model, feared French power, and were outraged by James's authoritarianism.

Scott Sowerby countered Pincus's thesis in 2013 in Making Toleration: The Repealers and the Glorious Revolution. He noted that English taxes remained low during James II's reign, at about 4% of the English national income, and thus it was unlikely that James could have built a bureaucratic state on the model of Louis XIV's France, where taxes were at least twice as high as a proportion of GDP.[174] Sowerby also contends that James's policies of religious toleration attracted substantial support from religious nonconformists, including Quakers, Baptists, Congregationalists and Presbyterians, who were attracted by the king's push for a new "Magna Carta for liberty of conscience".[175] The king was overthrown, in Sowerby's view, largely because of fears among the Dutch and English elites that James might be aligning himself with Louis XIV in a supposed "holy league" to destroy Protestantism across northern Europe.[176] Sowerby presents James's reign as a struggle between those who believed that the king was sincerely devoted to liberty of conscience and those who were sceptical of the king's espousals of toleration and believed that he had a hidden agenda to overthrow English Protestantism.

Titles, styles, honours, and arms[edit]

Half crown coin of James II, 1686

Titles and styles[edit]

  • 14 October 1633 – 6 February 1685: The Duke of York
  • 10 May 1659 – 6 February 1685: The Earl of Ulster[13]
  • 31 December 1660 – 6 February 1685: The Duke of Albany
  • 6 February 1685 – 23 December 1688 (by Jacobites until 16 September 1701): His Majesty The King

The official style of James in England was "James the Second, by the Grace of God, King of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, etc." The claim to France was only nominal, and was asserted by every English king from Edward III to George III, regardless of the amount of French territory actually controlled. In Scotland, he was "James the Seventh, by the Grace of God, King of Scotland, England, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, etc."[4]

James was created Duke of Normandy by King Louis XIV of France on 31 December 1660.[13]

In 1734 the Archbishop of Paris opened the cause for the canonisation of James as a saint, making him a Servant of God among Catholics.[177]

Honours[edit]

Appointments

Arms[edit]

Prior to his accession, James's coat of arms was the royal arms (which he later inherited), differenced by a label of three points Ermine.[179] His arms as king were: Quarterly, I and IV Grandquarterly, Azure three fleurs-de-lis Or (for France) and Gules three lions passant guardant in pale Or (for England); II Or a lion rampant within a double tressure flory-counter-flory Gules (for Scotland); III Azure a harp Or stringed Argent (for Ireland).

James II's coat of arms
Coat of arms of James, Duke of York, KG
Coat of arms of James II as king (outside Scotland)
Coat of arms of King James VII in Scotland

Family tree[edit]

In four generations of Stuarts, there were seven reigning monarchs (not including Hanover's George I). James II was the fourth Stuart monarch in England, the second of his generation and the father of two more.

Principal members of the House of Stuart following the 1603 Union of the Crowns

Issue[edit]

Legitimate issue[edit]

Name Birth Death Notes
By Anne Hyde
Charles, Duke of Cambridge 22 October 1660 5 May 1661  
Mary II 30 April 1662 28 December 1694 married 1677, William III, Prince of Orange; no issue
James, Duke of Cambridge 11 or 12 July 1663 20 June 1667  
Anne, Queen of Great Britain 6 February 1665 1 August 1714 married 1683, Prince George of Denmark; no surviving issue
Charles, Duke of Kendal 4 July 1666 22 May 1667  
Edgar, Duke of Cambridge 14 September 1667 8 June 1671  
Henrietta 13 January 1669 15 November 1669  
Catherine 9 February 1671 5 December 1671  
By Mary of Modena
Unnamed child March or May 1674 stillbirth[180]
Catherine Laura 10 January 1675 3 October 1675 died of convulsions[180]
Unnamed child October 1675 stillbirth[180]
Isabel (or Isabella) 28 August 1676 2 or 4 March 1681 buried in Westminster Abbey on 4 March (Old Style) as "The Lady Isabella, daughter to the Duke of York"[181]
Charles, Duke of Cambridge 7 November 1677 12 December 1677 died of smallpox[180]
Elizabeth c. 1678  
Unnamed child February 1681 stillbirth[180]
Charlotte Maria 16 August 1682 16 October 1682 died of convulsions[180] and buried in Westminster Abbey on 8 October (Old Style) as "The Lady Charlotte-Marie, daughter to the Duke of York"[182]
Unnamed child October 1683 stillbirth[180]
Unnamed child May 1684 stillbirth[183]
James, Prince of Wales "the Old Pretender" 10 June 1688 1 January 1766 married 1719, Clementina Sobieska; had issue
Louisa Maria Teresa 28 June 1692 18 April 1712 no issue

Illegitimate issue[edit]

Name Birth Death Notes
By Arabella Churchill
Henrietta FitzJames 1667 3 April 1730 Married, firstly, Henry Waldegrave; had issue. Married, secondly, Piers Butler, 3rd Viscount Galmoye; no issue.
James FitzJames, 1st Duke of Berwick 21 August 1670 12 June 1734 Married, firstly, Lady Honora Burke (a/k/a Lady Honora de Burgh) and had issue. Married, secondly, Anne Bulkely and had issue.[184]
Henry FitzJames, 1st Duke of Albemarle August 1673 December 1702 Married Marie Gabrielle d'Audibert de Lussan; had issue.
Arabella FitzJames 1674 7 November 1704 Became a nun under the name Ignatia.[184]
By Catherine Sedley
Catherine Darnley c. 1681 13 March 1743 Alleged daughter. Married, firstly, James Annesley, 3rd Earl of Anglesey and had issue. Married, secondly, John Sheffield, 1st Duke of Buckingham and Normanby and had issue.[184]
James Darnley 1684 22 April 1685
Charles Darnley Died young[184]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b An assertion found in many sources that James died on 6 September 1701 (17 September 1701 New Style) may result from a calculation done by an author of anonymous "An Exact Account of the Sickness and Death of the Late King James II, as also of the Proceedings at St. Germains thereupon, 1701, in a letter from an English gentleman in France to his friend in London".[2] The account reads: "And on Friday the 17th instant, about three in the afternoon, the king died, the day he always fasted in memory of our blessed Saviour's passion, the day he ever desired to die on, and the ninth hour, according to the Jewish account, when our Saviour was crucified." As 17 September 1701 New Style falls on a Saturday and the author insists that James died on Friday, "the day he ever desired to die on", so the author may have miscalculated the date, which later made it to various reference works.[3]
  2. ^ a b MacLeod and Waller wrote that all of James's remains were lost in the French Revolution. The English Illustrated Magazine's article on St. Germain from September 1903 claimed that parts of his bowel interred at the parish church of St. Germain-en-Laye were rediscovered in 1824 and reburied.[155] Hilliam disputed that his remains were either scattered or lost, stating that when revolutionaries broke into the church, they were amazed at the body's preservation and it was put on public exhibition where miracles were said to have happened. Hilliam stated that the body was then kept "above ground" until George IV heard about it and ordered the body buried in the parish church of St Germain-en-Laye in 1824.[156]
  3. ^ Anne "made the greatest single impact upon his thinking" and that she converted shortly after the Restoration, "almost certainly before her husband".[48]
  4. ^ According to Turner, James's reaction to the agreement was "The King shall be obeyed, and I would be glad if all his subjects would learn of me to obey him".[60]
  5. ^ Covenanters, as they did not recognize James (or any uncovenanted king) as a legitimate ruler, would not petition James for relief from the penal laws.
  6. ^ Historians are unclear on Farmer's exact religious affiliation. Macaulay wrote that Farmer "pretended to turn Papist".[112] Prall called him a "Catholic sympathizer".[113] Miller wrote that "although he had not declared himself a Catholic, it was believed he was no longer an Anglican".[114] Ashley did not refer to Farmer by name, but only as the King's Catholic nominee.[115] All these sources agreed that Farmer's bad reputation as a "person of scandalous character" was as much a deterrent to his nomination as his uncertain religious loyalties.[113]
  7. ^ Harris analyses the legal nature of the abdication; James did not agree that he had abdicated.[135]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Miller (2000), p. 240.
  2. ^ Somers, John. Tracts. Vol. XI 1809–1815. pp. 339–342.
  3. ^ Browning, Andrew, ed. (2001). English Historical Documents 1660–1714. Routledge. pp. 136–138.
  4. ^ a b "No. 2009". The London Gazette. 16 February 1684. p. 1.
  5. ^ Quinn, Stephen. "The Glorious Revolution". Economic History Association EH.net. Retrieved 3 January 2019.
  6. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 6–7.
  7. ^ Harris, Tim; Taylor, Stephen, eds. (2015). The Final Crisis of the Stuart Monarchy. Boydell & Brewer. pp. 144–159. ISBN 978-1-783-27044-6.
  8. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 264–268.
  9. ^ Miller (2000), p. 1.
  10. ^ a b Callow (2000), p. 31.
  11. ^ Callow (2000), p. 34.
  12. ^ Miller (2000), p. 10; Callow (2000), p. 101
  13. ^ a b c d e Weir, Alison (1996). 258. Britain's Royal Families: The Complete Genealogy. Revised Edition. Random House, London. ISBN 0-7126-7448-9.
  14. ^ Callow (2000), p. 36.
  15. ^ a b Miller (2000), p. 3.
  16. ^ Callow (2000), p. 42.
  17. ^ White, Geoffrey H.; Lea, R.S. (eds.). "Duke of York". The Complete Peerage. Vol. XII. p. 914.
  18. ^ Callow (2000), p. 45.
  19. ^ Callow (2000), pp. 48–50.
  20. ^ Royle (2004), p. 517.
  21. ^ Miller 2000, p. 15.
  22. ^ a b Miller (2000), pp. 16–17.
  23. ^ a b The Complete Peerage, p. 915.
  24. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 19–20.
  25. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 19–25.
  26. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 22–23.
  27. ^ Miller (2000), p. 24.
  28. ^ Miller (2000), p. 25.
  29. ^ Callow (2000), p. 89.
  30. ^ Gibbs, Vicary (1910). Cokayne, George Edward (ed.). The Complete Peerage. Vol. I. p. 83.
  31. ^ Callow (2000), p. 90.
  32. ^ Miller (2000), p. 44.
  33. ^ a b c d e Miller (2000), pp. 44–45.
  34. ^ Waller (2002), pp. 49–50.
  35. ^ Pepys, Samuel (12 September 2007). "Monday 12 September 1664". The Diary of Samuel Pepys.
  36. ^ a b c Miller (2000), p. 46.
  37. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 45–46.
  38. ^ Miller (2000), p. 59.
  39. ^ Callow (2000), p. 101.
  40. ^ Brewer, Holly (October 2017). "Slavery, Sovereignty, and 'Inheritable Blood': Reconsidering John Locke and the Origins of American Slavery". American Historical Review. 122 (4): 1038–1078. doi:10.1093/ahr/122.4.1038.; Miller (2000), pp. 43–44
  41. ^ Davies, Kenneth Gordon (1999). The Royal African Company (reprint ed.). Routledge. p. 62. ISBN 9780415190770.
  42. ^ Callow (2000), p. 104.
  43. ^ Miller (2000), p. 42.
  44. ^ Spelling modernized for clarity; quoted by Adrian Tinniswood (2003). 80. By Permission of Heaven: The Story of the Great Fire of London. London: Jonathan Cape.
  45. ^ "The Royal African Company (RAC) is Founded". Archived from the original on 14 November 2022. Retrieved 14 November 2022.
  46. ^ Pettigrew, William A. (2013). Freedom's Debt. The Royal African Company and the Politics of the Atlantic Slave Trade, 1672–1752. University of North Carolina Press. p. 11. ISBN 978-1-4696-1182-2.
  47. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 58–59; Callow (2000), pp. 144–145
  48. ^ Callow (2000), p. 144.
  49. ^ Callow (2000), pp. 143–144; Waller (2002), p. 135
  50. ^ Callow (2000), p. 149.
  51. ^ a b Miller (2000), pp. 69–71.
  52. ^ Kenyon (1986), p. 385.
  53. ^ Waller (2002), p. 92.
  54. ^ Waller (2002), pp. 16–17.
  55. ^ Miller (2000), p. 73.
  56. ^ Turner (1948), pp. 110–111.
  57. ^ Waller (2002), pp. 30–31.
  58. ^ Miller (2000), p. 99.
  59. ^ Miller (2000), p. 84; Waller (2002), pp. 94–97
  60. ^ Turner (1948), p. 132.
  61. ^ Miller (2000), p. 87.
  62. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 99–105.
  63. ^ Harris (2006), p. 74.
  64. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 93–95.
  65. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 103–104.
  66. ^ Miller (2000), p. 90.
  67. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 87–91.
  68. ^ Miller (2000), p. 95.
  69. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 98–99.
  70. ^ Miller (2000), p. 89; Callow (2000), pp. 180–183
  71. ^ "Shipwreck The Gloucester hailed most important since Mary Rose". BBC News. 10 June 2022.
  72. ^ Thomas, Tobi (10 June 2022). "Wreck of Royal Navy warship sunk in 1682 identified off Norfolk coast". The Guardian.
  73. ^ a b c d Miller (2000), pp. 115–116.
  74. ^ Miller (2000), p. 116; Waller (2002), pp. 142–143
  75. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 116–117.
  76. ^ Miller (2000), p. 117.
  77. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 118–119.
  78. ^ a b Miller (2000), pp. 120–121.
  79. ^ Harris (2006), p. 45.
  80. ^ Miller (2000), p. 121.
  81. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 44–45.
  82. ^ Miller (2000), p. 123.
  83. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 140–143; Harris (2006), pp. 73–86
  84. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 139–140.
  85. ^ a b Harris (2006), pp. 75–76.
  86. ^ Harris (2006), p. 76.
  87. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 82–85.
  88. ^ a b c Miller (2000), p. 141.
  89. ^ a b Harris (2006), p. 88.
  90. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 141–142.
  91. ^ Miller (2000), p. 142.
  92. ^ a b Miller (2000), pp. 142–143.
  93. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 95–100.
  94. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 146–147.
  95. ^ Macaulay (1889), pp. 349–350.
  96. ^ Macaulay (1889), p. 242; Harris (2006), pp. 480–481
  97. ^ Macaulay (1889), p. 242; Harris (2006), p. 70
  98. ^ Macaulay (1889), pp. 385–386; Turner (1948), p. 373
  99. ^ Miller (2000), p. 142; Macaulay (1889), p. 445
  100. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 195–196.
  101. ^ a b Miller (2000), pp. 150–152.
  102. ^ Macaulay (1889), p. 444.
  103. ^ Macaulay (1889), p. 368.
  104. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 156–157; Harris (2006), pp. 192–195
  105. ^ Macaulay (1889), pp. 368–369; Harris (2006), p. 192
  106. ^ Dixon, Dennis (20 November 2006). "Godden v Hales revisited – James II and the dispensing power". The Journal of Legal History. 27 (2): 129–152. doi:10.1080/01440360600831162. ISSN 0144-0365.
  107. ^ Kenyon (1986), pp. 389–391.
  108. ^ Sowerby (2013), p. 42.
  109. ^ Macaulay (1889), p. 429; Harris (2006), pp. 480–482
  110. ^ a b Harris (2006), pp. 216–224.
  111. ^ a b Harris (2006), pp. 224–229.
  112. ^ Macaulay (1889), p. 264.
  113. ^ a b Prall (1972), p. 148.
  114. ^ Miller (2000), p. 170.
  115. ^ Ashley (1996), p. 89.
  116. ^ Jones (1988), p. 132.
  117. ^ Jones (1988), pp. 132–133.
  118. ^ Jones (1988), p. 146.
  119. ^ Sowerby (2013), pp. 136–143.
  120. ^ Jones (1988), p. 150.
  121. ^ Jones (1988), p. 159.
  122. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 258–259.
  123. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 260–262; Prall (1972), p. 312
  124. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 186–187; Harris (2006), pp. 269–272
  125. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 271–272; Ashley (1996), pp. 110–111
  126. ^ Gregg, Edward (2000). Queen Anne. Routledge & Kegan Paul. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-710-00400-0.
  127. ^ Waller (2002), pp. 43–46; Miller (2000), pp. 186–187
  128. ^ Ashley (1996), pp. 201–202.
  129. ^ a b Miller (2000), pp. 190–196.
  130. ^ Waller (2002), pp. 236–239.
  131. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 201–203.
  132. ^ a b Miller (2000), pp. 205–209.
  133. ^ Claydon, Tony (2008). "William III and II". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/29450. ISBN 978-0-198-61412-8. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.); Plumb, J. H. (1937). "The Elections to the Convention Parliament of 1689". The Cambridge Historical Journal. 5 (3): 235–254. doi:10.1017/S1474691300001529. JSTOR 3020731.
  134. ^ Miller (2000), p. 209.
  135. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 320–328.
  136. ^ Devine (2006), p. 3; Harris (2006), pp. 402–407
  137. ^ Ashley (1996), pp. 206–209; Harris (2006), pp. 329–348
  138. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 349–350.
  139. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 222–224.
  140. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 226–227.
  141. ^ Harris (2006), p. 440.
  142. ^ a b Harris (2006), pp. 446–449.
  143. ^ Fitzpatrick, Brendan (1988). New Gill History of Ireland 3: Seventeenth-Century Ireland – The War of Religions. Gill and Macmillan. p. 253. ISBN 0-7171-1626-3.; Szechi, Daniel (1994). The Jacobites, Britain and Europe, 1688–1788. Manchester University Press. p. 48. ISBN 0-7190-3774-3.
  144. ^ Ó Buachalla, Breandán (Spring–Summer 1992). "Irish Jacobite Poetry". The Irish Review (12): 40–49. doi:10.2307/29735642. JSTOR 29735642.
  145. ^ Ó Buachalla (1996); Ó Ciardha (2002)
  146. ^ Miller (2000), p. 235.
  147. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 235–236.
  148. ^ "Burke's Peerage" (Second World War ed.). p. 228. Retrieved 23 June 2021.
  149. ^ Miller (2000), p. 238; Waller (2002), p. 350
  150. ^ Miller (2000), p. 239.
  151. ^ Miller (2000), pp. 234–236.
  152. ^ Macaulay (1889), p. 445.
  153. ^ Miller (2000), p. 240; Parish register of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, with transcription, at Association Frontenac-Amériques Archived 10 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine (in French)
  154. ^ Mann (2014), p. 223.
  155. ^ Hilliam (1998), p. 205.
  156. ^ Waller (2002), p. 401; MacLeod (1999), p. 349
  157. ^ a b Harris (2006), p. 493.
  158. ^ MacLeod (1999), p. 349.
  159. ^ MacLeod (1999), pp. 361–363.
  160. ^ MacLeod (1999), pp. 365–371.
  161. ^ MacLeod (1999), pp. 371–372.
  162. ^ MacLeod (1999), pp. 373–374.
  163. ^ Macaulay (1889), p. 239.
  164. ^ See Prall, vii–xv, for a more detailed historiography.
  165. ^ "James II of England" . Dictionary of National Biography. London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  166. ^ Belloc, Hilaire (1928). James the Second. J. B. Lippincott Company. p. vii. ISBN 978-0-8369-5922-2.
  167. ^ Ashley (1996), pp. 196–198.
  168. ^ Prall (1972), pp. 291–293.
  169. ^ a b Ashley (1996), p. 9.
  170. ^ Miller (2000), p. ix.
  171. ^ a b Speck, W.A. (September 2004). "James II and VII (1633–1701)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online May 2006 ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/14593. Retrieved 15 October 2007. He 'wished that all his subjects could be as convinced as he was that the Catholic church was the one true church. He was also convinced that the established church was maintained artificially by penal laws that proscribed nonconformity. If these were removed, and conversions to Catholicism were encouraged, then many would take place. In the event his optimism was misplaced, for few converted. James underestimated the appeal of Protestantism in general and the Church of England in particular. His was the zeal and even bigotry of a narrow-minded convert...'
  172. ^ Harris (2006), pp. 478–479.
  173. ^ Pincus, Steven (2009). 1688: The First Modern Revolution. Yale University Press. p. 475. ISBN 978-0-3001-1547-5.
  174. ^ Sowerby (2013), pp. 51–53.
  175. ^ Sowerby (2013), pp. 43–44.
  176. ^ Sowerby (2013), pp. 227–239.
  177. ^ Coulombe, Charles (5 March 2019). "The forgotten canonisation Cause of King James II". Catholic Herald. Retrieved 20 June 2019.
  178. ^ "List of Lord Wardens". The Confederation of Cinque Ports. Retrieved 31 March 2024.
  179. ^ Velde, Francois R. "Marks of cadency in the British royal family". Heraldica.
  180. ^ a b c d e f g Weir, p. 260
  181. ^ Chester, J. L. (1876). The Marriage, Baptismal, and Burial Registers of the Collegiate Church or Abbey of St. Peter, Westminster. Vol. 10. Harleian Society. p. 201.
  182. ^ Chester (1876), p. 206.
  183. ^ Weir, 261
  184. ^ a b c d Weir, p. 263

Sources[edit]

Further reading[edit]

  • Ashley, Maurice (1978). James II. J.M. Dent & Sons. ISBN 978-0-4601-2021-0.
  • DeKrey, Gary S. (2008). "Between Revolutions: Re-appraising the Restoration in Britain" History Compass 6 (3): 738–773.
  • Earle, Peter (1972). The Life and Times of James II. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.[ISBN missing]
  • Glassey, Lionel, ed. (1997). The Reigns of Charles II and James VII and II. [ISBN missing]
  • Goodlad, Graham (2007). "Before the Glorious Revolution: The Making of Absolute Monarchy? Graham Goodlad Examines the Controversies Surrounding the Development of Royal Power under Charles II and James II" History Review 58: 10 ff.
  • Johnson, Richard R. (1978). "Politics Redefined: An Assessment of Recent Writings on the Late Stuart Period of English History, 1660 to 1714." William and Mary Quarterly 35 (4): 691–732. doi:10.2307/1923211
  • Miller, John (1997). The Glorious Revolution (2nd ed.). Longman. ISBN 0-5822-9222-0.
  • Miller, John (2004). The Stuarts. ISBN 978-1-8528-5432-4.
  • Mullett, M. (1993). James II and English Politics 1678–1688. ISBN 0-4150-9042-3.
  • Ogg, David (1957). England in the Reigns of James II and William III, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Speck, W. A. (2002). James II. Longman. ISBN 978-0-5822-8712-9.
  • Van der Kiste, John (2021). James II and the first modern revolution. Barnsley: Pen & Sword. [ISBN missing]
  • Walcott, Robert (1962). "The Later Stuarts (1660–1714): Significant Work of the Last Twenty Years (1939–1959)" American Historical Review 67 (2): 352–370 doi:10.2307/1843428

External links[edit]

James II of England
Born: 14 October 1633 Died: 16 September 1701
Regnal titles
Preceded by King of England, Scotland and Ireland
1685–1688
Vacant
Title next held by
William III & II and Mary II
Honorary titles
Preceded by Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports
1660–1673
Succeeded by
Political offices
Vacant
Title last held by
Francis Cottington, 1st Baron Cottington
Lord High Admiral of England
1660–1673
Succeeded by
Preceded by Lord High Admiral of Scotland
1673–1688
Vacant
Title next held by
William Hamilton, Duke of Hamilton
Preceded by Lord High Commissioner to
the Parliament of Scotland

1680–1685
Succeeded by
Preceded by Lord High Admiral
1685–1688
Succeeded by
Titles in pretence
Loss of title
— TITULAR —
King of England, Scotland and Ireland
1688–1701
Succeeded by