Hans-Peter Uhl

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hans-Peter Uhl (2012)

Hans-Peter Uhl (born August 5, 1944 in Tübingen ; † October 27, 2019 ) was a German politician ( CSU ). From 1998 to 2017 he was a member of the German Bundestag .

Life

education

After graduating from the Albert-Einstein-Gymnasium Ravensburg , Uhl served two years as a soldier in the armed forces and from 1964 completed a law degree in Munich , which he completed with the first state examination in law. During his studies, Uhl joined the Rhenania fraternity (today: Arminia-Rhenania ). After his legal clerkship , he also passed the second state examination in law . In 1974 his promotion to Dr. jur. with the work Concentration Control in Great Britain, compared with the German amendment to cartel law (1973) .

Professional Experience

In 1975 he joined the financial administration of the Free State of Bavaria . From 1987 to 1998 he was head of the security and regulatory authority of the state capital Munich as a district administration officer . He was admitted to the bar in 1998 .

Party career

Uhl had been a member of the CSU since 1970. He was a member of the district executive committee of the CSU Munich-West. In 1999 he was a short-term CSU candidate for the office of Lord Mayor . However, he withdrew his candidacy because he “did not have the confidence of the current board of directors of the Munich CSU”, who would have rammed him in the back with “a knife with the letters CSU on the handle”. Peter Gauweiler explained in this context that the withdrawal actually took place "because [Uhl] underestimated his most dangerous opponent - himself".

Membership career

From 1998 to 2017 Uhl was a member of the German Bundestag. There he was chairman of the committee of inquiry into the visa affair in 2005 . Since November 2005 he has been chairman of the domestic policy working group and thus also domestic policy spokesman for the CDU / CSU parliamentary group . In the 18th electoral term he was legal advisor to his parliamentary group.

Hans-Peter Uhl retired in 1998 as directly selected delegates of the constituency Munich-West and from 2002 as a member of the constituency München-West / Mitte in the Bundestag one. In the 2013 Bundestag election it received 42.6 percent of the first votes (2009: 36.8%; 2005: 42.7%; 2002: 44.3%; 1998 with a different constituency structure: 47.3%).

In the 17th electoral term, Uhl was a member of the Bundestag interior committee and the parliamentary control body for monitoring the intelligence services. In the 2017 federal election he did not run again as a member of parliament.

Other engagement

Uhl was deputy chairman of the German European Security Association . In the area of ​​internal security, the organization represents an interface between users such as the Federal Criminal Police Office , political actors from the legislative and executive branches, as well as industry and research.

Private life

Hans-Peter Uhl was Catholic , married and the father of four sons; three of them come from their first marriage. On October 27, 2019, he died after a long and serious illness at the age of 75.

Political positions

Lobbying and lobbying registers

In 2016, Uhl, as legal advisor of the Union parliamentary group, opposed the opposition's application, which was later rejected by a majority, to make the representation of interests in parliament more transparent with a lobbyist register . He warned against “discrimination and stigmatization” of interest groups. Presenting and listening to individual interests should not be criminalized.

Internal security

As a district administration officer in Munich, Uhl was responsible for the expulsion of the young German-Turkish serial offender " Mehmet " in 1998 .

Uhl caused a sensation when he described the rejection of the revised BKA law by the Saxon SPD as a "left belch".

Uhl received sharp criticism from the other parties in response to the proposal to lower the age limit for storing personal data from the current 16 years to 14 or twelve years. According to Uhl, this should achieve “better surveillance of minors suspected of terrorism”. Uhl has rejected the criticism and explained in detail on parliament watch .

Telecommunications and New Media

Hans-Peter Uhl was a proponent of Internet regulation: “It's not about stronger regulation, but perhaps about a more intelligent form of regulation. Basically, the freedom of the internet is what makes it a great medium. On the other hand, it must also be possible on the Internet to guarantee the protection of minors and to sanction criminal content - in order to protect the population and youth from crime, terrorism and dirt. "

Internet blocking

Uhl caused outrage in 2009 in connection with the blocking of websites in Germany , when he defamed critics of the Internet blocking and in particular the members of the Chaos Computer Club (CCC) as "pseudo computer experts" and "without sense or understanding and morally depraved". He also spoke of "pseudo-civil rights committed [r] hysteria". "Any talk of 'censorship' or 'restriction of freedom' [is] perverse". Later he put the derailment into perspective: “I don't doubt that, for example, the members of the Chaos Computer Club are basically computer experts to be taken seriously. I am sorry that I used an unnecessarily polemical tone in the debate. After all, it is right to examine and question planned measures from all angles. "

Uhl later accused the Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger of “bogus actionism”: “She unilaterally relies on the deletion of such pages, although she knows exactly that this will not do anything.” Since deleted content could be uploaded to the Internet from another location It would be necessary to block illegal content, as this would represent an “unworthy judgment” by the state. Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger contradicted these statements. Other critics also accused Uhl of not being able to offer any guarantee by blocking child pornography that illegal content would not be posted again on the Internet from elsewhere.

With regard to child pornography, he wanted to learn from the experience of Chinese internet censorship at the Olympic Games in Beijing: “What the Chinese can do, we should be able to do too. I like to be an authority state ”.

Uhl justified his point of view several times on parliamentwatch.de , u. a. with the argument: "These barriers are certainly not a silver bullet, but they represent a higher hurdle for access than if the barrier were not there."

The German Bundestag decided on December 1, 2011 with the votes of the coalition of CDU / CSU and FDP to repeal the 2009 Access Difficulty Act - which was never applied.

Data retention

Uhl was a staunch supporter of data retention based on the concept of the Federal Ministry of the Interior.

According to Section 97 (3) TKG, telecommunications companies have already been allowed to save traffic data for up to six months after the invoice has been sent. The data retention in accordance with § 113a TKG would lead to this data at the communication service providers after a uniform minimum storage period, z. B. for six months, must be saved. Such a uniform storage period is intended to ensure the availability of traffic data so that they can be accessed by the police in individual cases in accordance with Section 113b TKG, • if a serious crime is involved (this would have to be defined more specifically in the law). • when a judge examines and orders this.

The Federal Constitutional Court had declared the data retention, which was temporarily in force, to be unconstitutional. However, the BVerfG has not prohibited data retention in principle, only the specific legal regulations. In principle, however, the court expressly approves this measure:

“In a constitutional state, the Internet must not form a legal vacuum. The possibility of an individual assignment of Internet contacts in the event of legal violations of some weight is therefore a legitimate concern of the legislature. If, under the current technical conditions, [...] telecommunication traffic data have to be evaluated for corresponding information from the service provider, this consequently does not raise any fundamental concerns. "

- BVerfG : BVerfG judgment of 2 March 2012, paragraph 260

The attacks in Norway of July 2011 took Uhl again as an opportunity to call for their introduction: "We need data retention. It must be possible to monitor internet traffic and telephone calls in advance. Only if the investigators can follow the communication when planning attacks can they thwart such acts and protect people. "Uhl continued to explain his demand with the statement" In truth, this act was born on the Internet. "When asked by Deutschlandfunk , to what extent Data retention would have prevented such an attack, Uhl did not want to comment and repeated his request. When asked by the broadcaster whether he was just a free rider , Uhl did not answer. He justified this by stating that the criticism came “from the left”.

The data retention is suspected by some critics insofar as it takes place “without cause”. In this context, the FDP also called for an end to its resistance to data retention. Uhl's approach was sharply criticized in parts of the press, by the SPD, Greens, FDP and Left Party, as well as by several experts. So threw him z. B. Dieter Wiefelspütz “a macabre instrumentalization of these horrific attacks”. In parts of the press, Uhl's demand was resolutely rejected. Among other things, it was pointed out that warning files with diffuse criteria create a climate of fear and can ultimately encourage denunciation. From this point of view, they are the opposite of openness and democracy.

Even after the series of attacks in southern France at the beginning of 2012, as well as after the extreme right-wing terrorist organization NSU was exposed in Germany and the explosive attacks at the 2013 Boston Marathon in the USA, Uhl again called for data retention to be introduced.

Increased intelligence awareness of the Internet

After the attacks in Norway in 2011 , Uhl called for intelligence services to provide more information on user behavior on the Internet . In this regard, he stated:

“The attack in Oslo and the massacre on the holiday island of Utoya, as well as the Islamist-motivated attack at Frankfurt Airport in March of this year, show that such acts may be committed by radicalized individuals, but they are planned on the Internet. Attacks by individual perpetrators can only be prevented with more detailed information from the intelligence service, especially on the Internet. The security authorities have to go on patrols more than before. "

- Hans-Peter Uhl : Telepolis

Efforts to ban violent games

Uhl repeatedly called for a ban on so-called " killer games ". In doing so, he repeatedly referred his claim to the game Counter-Strike approved in Germany by the USK for ages 16 and up . In this context, he declared, among other things, "Such killer games that evoke bad instincts in people must not be available to young people". In connection with the rampage in Winnenden and the game, he demanded “criminal law concretized prohibition norms” and established a direct connection between the consumption of the game by the perpetrator and the rampage: “The rampage in Winnenden shows again that the perpetrator was in advance his act has dealt intensively with so-called killer games ”. However, Uhl relativized the importance of prohibitions elsewhere: “Criminal law norms can only be a final barrier. It is certainly necessary to differentiate. "

Comments on the compulsory real name on the Internet

Uhl equated pseudonyms on the Internet with anonymity and therefore demanded that pseudonyms should not be used in social networks in order to promote a policy of openness.

State trojan

On October 10, 2011, Uhl described online searches and operations of a “state Trojan” (after the CCC had analyzed a copy of the state Trojan) as “legitimate measures” despite numerous criticisms and legal concerns. However, Uhl immediately acknowledged problems with regard to technical security and therefore demanded appropriate consequences, which were also initiated.

In a current hour of the Bundestag on online searches and sources TKÜ on October 19, 2011, Uhl said verbatim:

“The country is run by security authorities that are very controlled, very careful, very careful with the sensitive instrument of the sources TKÜ - and that's how it should be. That means it would be bad if our country were ultimately ruled by pirates and chaos from the computer club. It is ruled by security officers who are bound by the law and the law. "

- Hans-Peter Uhl : Bundestag media library

In the official minutes of the plenary session 17/132 of October 19, however, the content of Uhl's speech was reproduced with a different content. In the transcript on page 15611, Mr. Uhl was assigned the following wording:

“… Rather, the country has security authorities that handle the sensitive instrument of the source TKÜ very carefully, very carefully, and very carefully. That's how it should be. It would be bad if our country were ruled by pirates and chaos from the Chaos Computer Club. We have security officers who are bound by the law. "

- Hans-Peter Uhl : plenary minutes of the Bundestag

The official website of the Bundestag explains with reference to the publication of plenary minutes: “Every session of the German Bundestag is recorded verbatim and is available to the public as plenary minutes, so-called stenographic reports. The speaker checks the minutes before publication. In the event of any corrections, the meaning of the speech or its individual parts must not be changed. ”Uhl was accused of having manipulated his statements afterwards.

The following day, strangers carried out a so-called defacement on Uhl's website, i.e. changed the content of the page displayed there. The strangers stated that they belong to the collective around Anonymous . For example, instead of information about the politician, there was a black page with the activists' logo on it, as well as technical information about the web server and a YouTube video with Uhl's speech the day before with reference to the state Trojan.

"The minutes were drawn up autonomously by the stenographic service of the German Bundestag, without any influence on my part."

- Hans-Peter Uhl : Members watch

Furthermore, Uhl stated in the plenary session that the state Trojan was lawful in Bavaria, and that it had been used at a reduced rate. The software used “only did what it was allowed to do everywhere”. Meanwhile, the Landshut regional court classified a state Trojan operation in Bavaria as illegal. However, the review by the state data protection officer did not later reveal any tangible defects in the use of Trojans. In 9 out of 20 cases, software lists could have been read out during monitoring. To what extent this was covered by the court orders or was expedient is not entirely clear.

The CCC spokesman Frank Rieger said in October 2011:

“The authorities have clearly abused the trust placed in them and secretly did exactly what the Federal Constitutional Court prohibited them. The official malware has become a tool that was designed to secretly extract digital traces of life and thoughts from the suspect's computer and even go over to large eavesdropping and spying at the push of a button. "

- Frank Rieger : FAZ

At the end of October 2011, Uhl proposed that DigiTask employees should be employed by the federal government, where they could in future manufacture state Trojans under state supervision. The quality and functionality of various state Trojans manufactured by the company had previously been massively criticized by the CCC and various specialist media.

In 2010, Uhl and his CDU colleague Wolfgang Bosbach asked the Osnabrücker Zeitung that a legal basis for monitoring encrypted communication had to be created for state investigative authorities.

German IT security

In view of the US NSA's PRISM monitoring program , Uhl called on the government to invest hundreds of millions in IT security: “So that our state's and our company's communications cannot read any American, and certainly not Chinese or Russian, service, we have to have our own Build communication technology, be it German or European. "()

Uhl was of the opinion that the decentralized architecture of the Internet meant that the German state was not in a position to protect the privacy of its citizens on the Internet; it is "technically impossible".

Right-wing extremism

In view of the series of murders by the right-wing extremist Zwickau cell, Uhl noted structural deficiencies in the cooperation with the authorities. During a panel discussion in Munich, he emphasized the importance of immigration policy. "A good and sensible immigration policy must aim to prevent combat groups from emerging on the right wing," Uhl warned that social peace should not be jeopardized. It is of no use if you embrace the whole world but lose sight of your own citizens.

Reform of the registration law and address data trade

In June 2012, Hans-Peter Uhl was at the center of criticism of a reform of the registration law by the Bundestag, which affected both the content and the form of the adoption. The bill, which among other things was supposed to transfer the reporting system, which was previously regulated by the country, into the competence of the federal government, was passed by only 17 MPs present who belonged to the parliamentary groups of the Union and FDP. The 10 opposition MPs present from the SPD, Greens and Left voted against. Since none of the MPs or parliamentary groups present questioned the quorum of the Bundestag, the vote was valid despite the small number of MPs voting. The federal government's bill originally required that citizens must give the registration offices express permission to pass on their data for advertising purposes. However, on the day before the bill was voted on, Hans-Peter Uhl and Gisela Piltz from the FDP submitted an amendment to the Interior Committee, according to which citizens had to expressly object to disclosure for advertising purposes. Such an objection was therefore also ineffective if an address dealer only wanted to update the address of a person who had already been saved. Uhl justified his position as follows: “According to the highest court rulings in Germany, there is no right to hide.” He was based on a judgment of the Federal Administrative Court of June 21, 2006, according to which “the individual does not give himself up without good reason Can completely withdraw the environment, but remain accessible and have to accept that others contact him with government aid. ”On July 9, 2012, Focus Online quoted an employee of Uhls as saying:“ If we had made the consent solution, everyone would have Mail order company screamed. ”The sentence later had to be removed. Under the article it later said: "Two quotes from an employee, which were in the original version of this article, were removed at the request of the Uhls office with reference to a misunderstanding."

Due to the fierce public criticism, the federal government and the CSU consumer protection minister Ilse Aigner distanced themselves from the new reporting law and declared that they hoped the SPD-led Bundesrat would stop the bill. The FDP thereupon stated that Hans-Peter Uhl had primarily advocated the change in the objection regulation and had convinced the Interior Minister of his line.

Web links

Commons : Hans-Peter Uhl  - Collection of images, videos and audio files
Wikiquote: Hans-Peter Uhl  - Quotes

Individual evidence

  1. ↑ Wolfgang Krach: CSU: Knife in the back . In: Der Spiegel . No. 4 , 1999 ( online - Jan. 25, 1999 ).
  2. ↑ The self as the most dangerous opponent . heise online. October 25, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  3. ↑ The Bundestag is losing many familiar faces , Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung on June 23, 2017
  4. ↑ German European Security Association ( Memento of the original from November 12, 2013 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was automatically inserted and not yet checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. (Website) @1@ 2Template: Webachiv / IABot / gesa-network.de
  5. ↑ The pullers: When what does not belong together comes together . gulli.com. October 27, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  6. ↑ Dr. Hans-Peter Uhl . CSU regional group in the German Bundestag. Retrieved June 18, 2017.
  7. ↑ CSU politician Hans-Peter Uhl is dead. In: br.de. Retrieved October 29, 2019 .
  8. ↑ According to the Bundestag decision - "The influence of lobbyists is still very great". In: Deutschlandfunk. Retrieved June 14, 2016 .
  9. ^ Now also Saxony-Anhalt's SPD against BKA law. (No longer available online.) In: tagesschau.de. November 18, 2008, archived from the original on November 22, 2009 ; Retrieved December 22, 2008 .
  10. ↑ SPD resistance to BKA law gives FDP hope. In: Spiegel online. November 18, 2008, accessed October 21, 2011 .
  11. ↑ Union also wants to have children monitored. (No longer available online.) In: tagesschau.de. February 20, 2008, archived from the original on February 23, 2009 ; Retrieved December 22, 2008 .
  12. ↑ Dr. Hans-Peter Uhl: Answer from Dr. Hans-Peter Uhl . Parliament watch. February 24, 2009. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  13. ↑ Theses: Pros and Cons of the Candidates . Who to choose? 2009. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  14. ^ Stefan Krempl: CCC: Customers of "censorship providers" should complain. Heise , April 17, 2009, accessed April 5, 2010 .
  15. ↑ Question on the subject of home affairs and justice. parliamentwatch.de, accessed on April 5, 2010 .
  16. ↑ Martin Lutz: CSU accuses FDP of breaking the coalition agreement. Welt Online , April 5, 2010, accessed April 5, 2010 .
  17. ↑ Jörg-Olaf Schäfers: CSU interior expert Uhl: Deleting is not a solution. netzpolitik.org, April 5, 2010, accessed April 5, 2010 .
  18. ↑ "Killerspiele": Bavaria insists on a quick ban. In: Focus Online . September 1, 2008, accessed December 22, 2008 .
  19. ↑ Dr. Hans-Peter Uhl: Answer from Dr. Hans-Peter Uhl . Parliament watch. July 29, 2009. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  20. ↑ Decision recommendation and report of the Legal Affairs Committee (6th committee) (PDF; 154 kB) German Bundestag. November 30, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  21. ↑ Politicians are calling for stricter surveillance . Mirror online. November 18, 2010. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  22. ↑ Questions and answers on data retention . Rheinische Post. Retrieved June 18, 2017.
  23. ↑ BVerfG: Constitutionality of data retention . Telemedicus. March 2, 2010. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  24. ^ Judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court of March 2, 2010, paragraph 260. Retrieved on November 8, 2012.
  25. ↑ On the back of the dead . star. July 26, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  26. ^ After the massacre: Call for data retention. In: Focus Online . July 25, 2011. Retrieved July 25, 2011 .
  27. ↑ a b The misconceptions of the agitators . Mirror online. July 27, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  28. ↑ a b SECURITY: Union calls for "unreasonable" data retention. SPD criticizes the "instrumentalized" debate after attacks in Norway. (No longer available online.) In: Märkische Allgemeine. July 26, 2011, archived from the original on February 28, 2013 ; Retrieved June 26, 2011 .
  29. ↑ cf. z. B. Union faction revives the coalition's controversial issue - more protection through stored data? tagesschau.de, July 25, 2011 ( Memento from September 26, 2011 in the Internet Archive ).
  30. ↑ Why stay factual? . Time online. July 25, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  31. ↑ With data retention and "suspicious" files against terrorism . heise online. July 25, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  32. ↑ The hopeless call for data storage . Rheinische Post. July 25, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  33. ↑ cf. z. B. Internet Surveillance-The Archer's Thinking Mistakes. In: Spiegel.de. July 27, 2011, accessed July 27, 2011 .
  34. ↑ CSU interior expert Uhl "Toulouse proves the need for stored data". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , March 24, 2012, accessed on March 24, 2012 .
  35. ↑ "A terrorist attack that has been prepared for some time" . Deutschlandfunk. April 16, 2013. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  36. ↑ Rapid action after the massacre What German politicians and police unions have said in response to the murders in Norway is remarkable, Telepolis, July 25, 2011
  37. ↑ "Killerspiele": Bavaria insists on a quick ban. In: Focus.de. September 1, 2008, accessed December 8, 2013 .
  38. ^ Politicians LAN - LAN party in the Bundestag: politicians play Counter-Strike . gamona. February 25, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  39. ↑ The rampage in Winnenden - politicians criticize USK . golem.de. March 12, 2009. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  40. ↑ Hans-Peter Uhl: Answer from Dr. Hans-Peter Uhl . Parliament watch. March 28, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  41. ↑ Debate about pseudonyms Union politicians support Google's name obligation. In: Spiegel Online. September 6, 2011, accessed December 8, 2013 .
  42. ↑ Unconstitutional: Federal Trojans - Improved: Legal protection - Tricky: Finding the truth . Legal Tribune Online. October 10, 2010. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  43. ↑ “Legitimate Measures” . law blog. October 10, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  44. ↑ Edo Reents: In conversation: Hans-Peter Uhl - What excites you about the Trojan? October 23, 2011, accessed December 8, 2013 .
  45. ↑ Media library of the Bundestag  ( page no longer available , search in web archives )  Info: The link was automatically marked as defective. Please check the link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. from October 19, 2011. Also on YouTube with the title "Hans-Peter Uhl zum Staatstrojaner"@1@ 2Template: Toter Link / dbtg.tv  
  46. ↑ First speak, then think, then manipulate? . heise online. October 21, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  47. ↑ Plenary minutes 17/132 - German Bundestag, stenographic report, 132nd session, p. 15611. October 19, 2011 (PDF file, 860kb)
  48. ↑ Protocols . German Bundestag. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  49. ↑ Peter Mühlbauer : The self as the most dangerous opponent. In: Telepolis . October 25, 2011, accessed October 25, 2011 .
  50. ↑ Uhl offline: Anonymous hacks CSU politicians. In: Der Spiegel . October 20, 2011, accessed December 8, 2013 .
  51. ↑ Hans-Peter Uhl on parliament watch.de
  52. ↑ Anonymous hacks CSU politicians . Mirror online. October 20, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  53. ^ Test report Quellen-TKÜ (PDF; 1.8 MB) The Bavarian State Commissioner for Data Protection. July 30, 2012. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  54. ↑ Frank Rieger in the FAZ guest article on October 9, 2011. Retrieved on November 6, 2011.
  55. ↑ Federal Trojan DigiTask employees under state supervision in future? . Mitteldeutsche Zeitung. October 26, 2011. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  56. ↑ Union politicians increase pressure on Justice Minister . heise online. October 24, 2010. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  57. ↑ Jan-Keno Janssen: Prism scandal: Politicians call for IT "Made in Germany". - Heise, June 15, 2013
  58. ↑ Stefan Tomik: CSU politician Uhl: "The government cannot protect your data". In: faz.net. July 17, 2013, accessed December 8, 2013 .
  59. ↑ Uhl in an interview with Bayernkurier ( memento from February 10, 2013 in the web archive archive.today )
  60. ↑ Are the neo-Nazi victims themselves to be blamed for their death, Mr. Uhl? . MiGAZIN. January 16, 2012. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  61. ^ A coup d' état in the Bundestag: How two members of parliament pushed the reporting law through parliament . Parliament watch. July 9, 2012. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  62. ↑ Quorum . German Bundestag. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  63. ↑ ( page no longer available , search in web archives: background: quorum of the Bundestag )@1@ 2Template: Toter Link / www.stern.de
  64. ↑ a b Quick vote during the Italy game - the pullers behind the data GAU in the Bundestag. In: Focus .de. July 9, 2012, accessed July 12, 2012 .
  65. ^ Federal Administrative Court in the name of the people judgment . Federal Administrative Court. June 21, 2006. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  66. ↑ H. Gersmann, A. Maier: New reporting law in quick action-The suspicious haste of the coalition. In: taz .de. July 10, 2012, accessed December 8, 2013 .
  67. ^ Voting by ghosts in the Bundestag: Federal Government distances itself from the Registration Act. In: Spiegel Online . July 9, 2012, accessed December 8, 2013 .
  68. ↑ Passing on of addresses: Supreme data protection officer intensifies criticism of the registration law. In: Spiegel Online. July 9, 2012, accessed December 8, 2013 .
  69. ↑ Thorsten Denkler: hasty Bundestag vote on the right to report: under the radar of the public. In: Süddeutsche .de. July 10, 2012, accessed December 8, 2013 .
  70. ↑ Dispute over the Registration Act: Suddenly everyone is data protection. In: Spiegel Online. July 9, 2012, accessed December 8, 2013 .
personal data
SURNAME Uhl, Hans-Peter
BRIEF DESCRIPTION German lawyer and politician (CSU), Member of the Bundestag
DATE OF BIRTH August 5, 1944
PLACE OF BIRTH Tübingen
DATE OF DEATH October 27, 2019