Herbert Terpitz

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Freiberg. Chemical Institute for Inorganic Chemistry at the Bergakademie. Built 1951–1954.
Freiberg. Chemical Institute for Inorganic Chemistry at the Bergakademie. Vestibule. Built 1951–1954.
Dresden around 1960. South development on Ernst-Thälmann-Straße shortly after completion of the office tower on Pirnaischer Platz.
Dresden. Inner courtyard in Block B-Süd of Ernst-Thälmann-Straße. Built 1957-1958.
Dresden. Goose thief fountain in White Lane. In the background the new buildings at Weißer Gasse 1–8. Built 1956–1958.
Dresden-Johannstadt. July 25, 1960. High-rise apartment building and row of apartments on Striesener Straße. Both created based on type drafts for the special housing program in Dresden-Johannstadt.
Dresden 1961. Pupils draw on the edge of the excavation pit for the northeastern rebuilding of Ernst-Thälmann-Straße. Beyond the street the development of Ernst-Thälmann-Straße 3–7. Built 1958–1961.
Dresden 1972. Traffic noise measurement at Pirnaischer Platz. In the background the high-rise office building at Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse 3 and the new buildings on Ringstrasse 3-11.
Dresden. Fountain on the northeast side of Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse. In the background the development of Ernst-Thälmann-Straße 3–7. Built 1958–1961.
Dresden. Showcase lion pharmacy. Southern development on Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse 5. Built 1958–1961. Lion sculpture by Wilhelm Lachnit .
Dresden. Children's frieze on the corner house on Gewandhausstrasse. Built 1956–1958.
Dresden. New town hall with the ballroom wing, which was rebuilt between 1962 and 1965.
Dresden. Portal of the ballroom wing of the New Town Hall, which was rebuilt from 1962–1965. In the foreground one of the two shield lions by Georg Wrba .
Dresden. Portal facade of the country house, which was rebuilt from 1963–1965.
Dresden 1965. View to the Georgentor. Rebuilt 1963–1966.

Herbert Terpitz (born March 8, 1903 in Radeberg ; † June 18, 1967 in Dresden ) was a German architect .

Live and act

education and study

Herbert Terpitz completed his studies at the Saxon State Building School for Building and Civil Engineering in Dresden, which was directed by Martin Hammitzsch , and graduated in 1925.

From 1929 to 1933 he studied architecture in the master class for architecture at the Dresden Art Academy under Wilhelm Kreis , who had succeeded Heinrich Tessenow in the master class at the same time as the order for the building of the hygiene museum was placed in 1926 . Kreis had the students work on tasks from all areas of construction in a systematic sequence, which were mostly carried out in the form of student competitions. He always insisted on a technical and constructive development of the drafts without, however, “an overly large theoretical training apparatus making it difficult to see what is necessary and useful”. Kreis advocated a factual design. Stylistically, he was based on a clear, simple neoclassicism. He attached great importance to education for collective action and thinking. He was rather cautious about the absolute belief in technology, as it was represented by many protagonists of modernity at the time:

“The new architecture must emerge from technology, but is not contained in it. (...) (It) the building must be increased to a work of art in personal artisthood. "

- Wilhelm Kreis

independence

Together with Hans Edlich, Terpitz took part in the competition for the Reichsführer-School Neu-Grünwald near Munich in the year of his graduation in 1933. In 1934, the jury decided unanimously to split the prize money of 30,000 Reichsmarks over two prize categories. Of the total of 700 submitted works, 20 designs were awarded 1,000 Reichsmarks each and 20 designs - including the work by Terpitz and Edlich - were awarded 500 Reichsmarks each. All award winners and another 60 architects who were also shortlisted were invited to a second stage of the competition.

In a joint venture with Alfred Müller-Moreitz (Leipzig), Terpitz took part in the competition for the Dresden Gauforum in autumn 1934. On the Güntzwiesen , located between the Hygiene Museum and the Great Garden , the new Adolf-Hitler-Platz was to be built, around which the "monumental buildings of the state, the party and the city, as they grew out of the needs of the Third Reich" were to be grouped. The contribution by Terpitz and Müller-Moreitz was originally intended for the first prize at the 1935 jury. After deciphering the authorship of the competition entries, however, the work was excluded from the official evaluation and only given a purchase out of valuation (endowed with 1,000 Reichsmarks) because one of the two authors was not a member of the Reich Chamber of Fine Arts . For Herbert Terpitz, membership in the Reich Chamber of Fine Arts, which was a formal prerequisite for independent professional practice according to the Architects Act passed in 1934 , is only documented for 1938. His architecture office was on the ground floor of his own house at Clausen-Dahl-Straße 7 in Dresden- Leubnitz .

Together with his former fellow student Horst Grabner, Terpitz took part in an urban planning competition in 1936 for a community settlement on the site of the cleared Kaditzer Tännicht along Kötzschenbroder Straße . The contribution was awarded the 1st prize and the two architects were then commissioned with the execution, which extended until 1938. In 1939 he again took part with Horst Grabner in a competition, which was advertised exclusively by Dresden architects, for a community facility in the community estate that had just been completed. The working group won the 1st prize endowed with 1,800 Reichsmarks. Even after the judging was over, Hans Richter submitted a competition entry late . This contribution was purchased due to its high convincing quality and recommended for execution. Due to the war, however, the community facility was not implemented.

As part of the Dresden annual show "Garden and Home" from 1937, Terpitz built a small, single-storey weekend house with a traditional sloping roof, located in the garden in moving terrain . The exhibition was conceived as a continuation of the Reichsgartenschau Dresden in 1936 , thematically supplemented by the affordable private home for a wide range of people. On behalf of the Gauheimstättenamt, numerous residential and weekend houses of various sizes and designs were built on 300,000 m² of parking space in the Great Garden in the immediate vicinity of the original exhibition site on Stübelplatz (today's Strasbourg Square ), with costs ranging from 6,000 to 16,000 Reichsmarks. In line with the title of the exhibition, great importance was attached to integrating the buildings into the garden and the landscape. In the consumer magazine Interior Decoration , the small building was praised for meeting this requirement in an exemplary manner. Reference was also made to the successful interior design and the simple but careful layout.

Teacher at the academy

In 1938 Herbert Terpitz took over the teaching position for spatial art at the Academy of Applied Arts in Dresden as the successor to Oskar Menzel . After the prescribed on February 23, 1940 merger of the Dresden Academy and the Academy of Applied Arts Dresden to State Art School Dresden , he was a teacher in the by Wilhelm Kreis incorporated headed the Department of Architecture. At the same time, due to his long-standing SA membership, he was also called up by the police in the General Government for "long-term emergency service" in Krakow . Therefore, although he was officially included in the university's staff from 1940 to 1945 and also paid by it, he was de facto not active as a teacher in the department headed by Paul Fliether from 1942 onwards .

Rehabilitation and reorientation

After a brief captivity , Herbert Terpitz returned to Dresden in 1945. Since there was a shortage of experienced architects in the immediate post-war years for the seemingly unsolvable task of rebuilding , he immediately found a job in the centrally managed planning office Industrie-blueprint Dresden . The recourse to an experienced architect like him, who had successfully advanced his career in the Third Reich, was indispensable and by no means an isolated case. Even in the ensemble of “architects of the first hour”, architects such as B. Hans Gericke , Otto Selbst and Kurt W. Leucht people with a similar biographical background work.

A return to self-employment as an architect was not possible for him at that time. With the establishment of the German Economic Commission (DWK) in June 1947, the process of economic and thus also political restructuring began with the aim of developing national economic planning that would later be transformed into a planned economy . The construction industry was also converted to planned economy structures. Along with the rigorous restriction of private acquisitions, the abolition of the liberal professions was also sought as a medium-term goal. With the progressive expansion of the state design offices and the state-owned construction sector, the remaining freelance architects were gradually restricted in their activities. From 1950 onwards, no more private architecture firms were permitted at all. The future of building activity in the GDR belonged unrivaled to the nationally owned (VE) project planning offices.

Employment in the design office for industrial buildings

From 1945 Terpitz worked as an employed architect in the design office for industrial buildings Dresden I (renamed in 1957 to design office of VEB Industrie-Projektierung Dresden I ).

The areas of responsibility of the design office for industrial construction were varied in the early years of the GDR. Under the direction of Kurt Borges, during the planning of the assembly hall of the transformer and x-ray plant in Dresden, the first experiments with the construction of storey- high precast concrete parts in multi-storey buildings were carried out, and the first prefabricated building in the GDR was realized. In addition to classic industrial construction tasks, the office was also repeatedly entrusted with design and implementation tasks for other areas (e.g. reconstruction of the Semper Gallery, University of Transport “Friedrich List”, Dresden)

In 1951 Terpitz worked as a collective employee on the project planning and implementation of the new building for the Institute for Inorganic Chemistry of the Bergakademie Freiberg , which was named after the well-known scientist Clemens Winkler . The rapidly increasing number of students after the war made an expansion plan with new institute buildings necessary for the Bergakademie. The main highlight of the complex is the large lecture hall, built on a trapezoidal floor plan, as it was typical for the early 1950s. The dynamized form, which nevertheless does not exclude slightly classical elements in the front, is obviously inspired by the Village College in Impington, Great Britain, built in 1939 by Walter Gropius and Maxwell Fry .

The events surrounding the popular uprising of June 17, 1953 also affected the design office and led to drastic personnel changes. After the management under the then director Kurt Borges, in the aftermath of the uprising, centralized demands for freedom of movement, freedom of travel to capitalist countries, free reference to literature and the like. a. Borges and three other executives were sentenced to imprisonment. The management of the office was then transferred to the young architect Hellmuth Bräuer, who also became the first chairman of the Dresden district group of the newly founded Association of German Architects in the GDR that same year . Terpitz himself was also a member of the BdA and a long-standing member of the board. He was also part of the "Kreis-Kreis", an interest group for the professional exchange of former students and employees of Wilhelm Kreis.

Under Bräuer's direction, Terpitz then worked collectively on the design office's contribution to the limited ideas competition for “the further urban and architectural design of the central square in Dresden” announced by the Dresden City Planning Office on September 10, 1953. The competition task consisted of rebuilding the Dresden Altmarkt into a central parade area with a high-rise building on the north side, a hotel on the east side, various shops, the party house on the south side of the square as well as an inn and a department store at the end of Prager Strasse . After only four weeks of processing, the panel of judges met on October 20, 1953 under the direction of Edmund Collein and awarded the contribution by the Hermann Wheels group from the HAB Weimar with 1st prize.

As early as November 1952, a “competition for the urban and architectural design of the construction measures in the center” was held among three collectives from VEB (Z) Projektierung Sachsen. The aim of the competition was to expand the space to 20,000 square meters, to build a house for the city ​​council on the north side and a house for the SED on the south side. Because the participants all violated the basic objective of offering a large demonstration site, none of the four submitted entries could completely convince the jury and demonstratively no 1st prize was awarded. Since at least the second-placed contribution from the Herbert Schneider collective and the third-placed contribution from the Johannes Rascher collective showed certain basic features of the national tradition and the desired urban constellation, the two were asked to revise the drafts.

Both competitions were preceded by years of debate about the appropriate location and the correct shape and size of the future central demonstration area, as postulated in the Sixteen Principles of Urban Development . After the Altmarkt had been officially determined for it, the planned high-rise building on the north side of the square and the expansion of the historic square shape to the south met with fierce criticism not only from specialist circles, but also from the general population. At the meeting of the architecture council on August 5, 1953, Herbert Terpitz and Helmut Köckeritz demanded that the Kreuzkirche be shielded from the Altmarkt.

Employment in the design office for building construction

From 1954 Terpitz worked as a leading architect in the design office for building construction Dresden I (renamed in 1959 as the design office of VEB Hochbauprojektierung Dresden I ), where he was mainly entrusted with the reconstruction of the war-torn city center of Dresden. At the time of Terpitz's entry, Johannes Rascher was the acting chief architect of the design office.

When, with the dissolution of the states in the GDR in 1952, the design office became part of the city planning office of the Dresden District Council , it was almost directly under the influence of the city. As a permanent participant in the drafting council meetings, in which the department heads presented the work statuses of the individual projects, the then acting chief architect of the city, Herbert Schneider, actively participated in the discussion and thus directly contributed his ideas. The chief architect of the city of Dresden, also known as the city architect, was directly subordinate to the mayor , was responsible for carrying out the city planning work and was a central key figure for all architectural and urban planning issues in the city. He was given technical guidance by the Ministry of Development . The position of chief architect was created in connection with the restructuring of the building industry in the GDR in 1955, which took place as a consequence of the All- Union Conference in 1954 in the Soviet Union. In a groundbreaking speech there, Khrushchev had radically distanced himself from previous building in the style of the National Tradition and proclaimed an immediate move towards rationalized building methods in the Soviet Union. Immediately after the conference, an official exegesis took place in the GDR, adapted to the specific political and economic circumstances.

1956 to 1961, the collective design group II under the direction of Terpitz and Heinz Mersiowsky executed the three building blocks A-Süd, B-Süd and D-Süd with the inner pedestrian zones to the east of the Altmarkt. Block C-South was created by the collective design group I under the direction of Wolfgang Hänsch and Gerd Dettmar . The building drafts were based on the urban development plan drawn up by the city architect Herbert Schneider and his collective from the city building department and officially confirmed in 1957. This intended to tie in with the historical structure of the city center. It goes without saying that the old image of the city before the destruction should not be restored, but rather something of the earlier urban atmosphere should be preserved and the character of the once dense and high-rise old town center should be transferred to the new, modern structures. As a particularly effective accent, an eight-story office and commercial building was built on the north-eastern corner of the quarter at the intersection of Ernst-Thälmann-Straße (now again Wilsdruffer Straße ) and Ringstraße . Particular care was taken in adapting the new development to the buildings on the old market that had been built years earlier. In spite of the turn to industrial construction, which was officially propagated from 1955, the buildings still bear the features of the style of the national tradition, even if only in a restrained form. Terpitz responded as follows:

“The buildings on the complex had to echo the buildings on the Altmarkt in terms of their structure and architectural expression, in order not to break through the uniformity of the buildings in the central district with these buildings with the same purpose. A consistent removal could only take place in buildings of a special type and at a special location. Nevertheless, an attempt was made to incorporate the increasingly prevalent findings of a strong simplification. If this integration and modesty have succeeded, this will only be beneficial in the overall picture of the new Dresden of tomorrow. "

- Herbert Terpitz 1960

From 1962 to 1965, Terpitz, as the lead architect, worked with Manfred Arlt and the collective to rebuild the ballroom wing of the New Town Hall . On the night of the bombing of 13./14. February heavily destroyed ballroom wing had been rebuilt in a simplified form from 1948. With the reconstruction, the city parliament received an intact plenary hall again. A new ballroom and the council cellar were also housed in the new building. The commissioning of the design office with this prominent task was in connection with the decision of the Politburo as a result of the 5th  party congress of the SED in June 1958 to rebuild the still destroyed areas of the city center of Dresden, including or removing the existing ruins of historical buildings. The urban planning revision was originally supposed to be carried out by the urban planning office under the direction of Hans Bronder, referred to as the “Red City Planning Office” by the Dresden population. However, since the SED was unable to react to the new resolutions with the necessary speed and rigor, a "brigade" was installed in the urban planning office on direct instructions from the SED city management, made up of party congress delegates of the SED duration.

Terpitz's designs from the time in the design office for building construction are shaped by the will to incorporate old architectural elements into modern buildings. As head of a BdA working group, he campaigned for the preservation or restoration of historical buildings in the Dresden district as well as for the renovation of old city centers, taking into account the preservation of art-historically valuable material. This body enjoyed such a great reputation among experts that the Institute for Monument Preservation was happy to consult it for technical support. In cooperation, salvaged valuable architectural treasures of old Dresden were made accessible to the public. A particularly outstanding example of this fruitful cooperation is the integration of spoils recovered from the rubble into the new buildings of the perimeter block development to the east of the Altmarkt. For example, parts of the children's frieze by Christoph Walther I were integrated into the corner building at Gewandhausstrasse.

Because of his services to the reconstruction of the city center of Dresden, Terpitz was awarded the Martin Andersen Nexö Art Prize of the City of Dresden in 1966 together with Manfred Arlt .

Even after Terpitz was unable to return to his job due to a serious illness, his enthusiasm and devotion for architecture remained unbroken. He continued to follow the work of his colleagues with interest and took part in almost all important events of the BdA district group until shortly before his death in 1967.

Buildings and projects

  • 1933–1934: Competition designs in a two-stage competition for the Reichsfuhrer School of the NSDAP in Neu-Grünwald near Munich (in collaboration with Hans Edlich)
  • 1934–1935: Competition design for the Gauforum Dresden (in collaboration with Müller-Moreitz (Leipzig); originally intended for 1st prize, then purchase out of valuation)
  • 1936–1939: Community settlement Dresden-Kaditz, Kötzschenbroder Straße (based on the competition design, which was awarded the 1st prize, together with Horst Grabner, carried out by the Dresden City Planning Office)
  • 1937: Weekend house in the "garden in moving terrain" at the Dresden annual show "garden and home"
  • 1938: Approved building project for two residential buildings, Dresden
  • 1938: Approved building project for a two-family house, Dresden
  • 1939: Competition design for the community facility in the Dresden-Kaditz community development, Kötzschenbroder Strasse (awarded 1st prize, together with Horst Grabner, not implemented due to the war)
  • 1951–1954: Institute for Inorganic Chemistry at Bergakademie Freiberg (together with Otto Merwitz and Hellmuth Bräuer, design office for industrial buildings)
  • 1953: Competition design for the further urban and architectural design of the central square in Dresden (participation in the contribution of the collective design office for industrial building Dresden, under the direction of Hellmuth Bräuer, with Helmut Köckeritz, Hans Jahresig, Rudolf Dietz and Hans Kranke, not carried out)
  • 1956–1958: Residential and commercial buildings in Weiße Gasse 1–8 and Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse ( Wilsdruffer Strasse ) 9–13 in Dresden (as a collective leading architect together with Gerhard Müller and architects' collective design group II, VEB Hochbauprojektierung Dresden)
  • 1957: Development plan and type design for the special housing program in Dresden- Johannstadt (in the architects' collective with Wolfgang Hänsch and Johannes Rascher , VEB Hochbauprojektierung Dresden)
  • 1957–1958: residential and commercial buildings at Gewandhausstrasse 1–7 in Dresden (as a collective leading architect together with Gerd Dettmar , Heinz Zimmermann and architects' collective design group II, VEB Hochbauprojektierung Dresden)
  • 1958–1961: Residential and commercial buildings at Ringstrasse 3–11 and Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse (Wilsdruffer Strasse) 3–7 in Dresden (as collective leading architect together with Heinz Mersiowsky , Manfred Arlt and the architectural collective design group II, VEB Hochbauprojektierung Dresden)
  • 1959: Competition draft for the "Ideas competition to obtain drafts for the House of Socialist Culture - Dresden" in a collective with Wolfgang Hänsch , Gerd Dettmar and Günther Gruner
  • 1962–1965: Reconstruction of the ballroom wing of the New Town Hall in Dresden (in a new draft version, as the collective leading architect together with Manfred Arlt and the collective)
  • 1963–1965: Reconstruction of the country house as a museum for the history of the city of Dresden (as lead architect together with Manfred Arlt and collective)
  • 1963–1966: Reconstruction of the Georgenbau of the Dresden Palace (as lead architect together with Manfred Arlt and collective)

Prices

  • 1962: Karl Friedrich Schinkel Medal for services to the BdA
  • 1965: Medal "Builder of the City Center of Dresden"
  • 1966: Martin Andersen Nexö Art Prize of the City of Dresden

Fonts

  • with Wolfgang Hänsch and Johannes Rascher : Special housing program in Dresden-Johannstadt. In: German architecture. 6th year 1957, issue 3, p. 121 f.
  • Construction of Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse in Dresden. In: German architecture. 9th year 1960, issue 4, p. 191 f.

literature

  • Herbert Roth: Dresden annual show "Garden and Home". In: interior decoration . Born 1937, issue 7.
  • Walter May , Werner Pampel, Hans Konrad: Architectural Guide GDR, Dresden District . VEB Verlag für Bauwesen, Berlin 1979.
  • Manfred Altner: Dresden. From the Royal Art Academy to the College of Fine Arts. Dresden 1990, ISBN 3-364-00145-6 .
  • Christiane Wolf: Gauforen - centers of power. On National Socialist architecture and urban planning. Verlag Bauwesen, Berlin 1999, ISBN 3-345-00694-4 .
  • Carl Hirschmann : The Dresden Competition. In: Deutsche Bauzeitung . Born in 1935, issue 25.
  • Hans Reichow : Competition Adolf-Hitler-Platz in Dresden. In: Zentralblatt der Bauverwaltung . 55th year 1935, issue 31, pp. 593–602.
  • Anna Teut : Architecture in the Third Reich 1933–1945 (= Bauwelt-Fundamente , 19). Ullstein, Berlin 1967, ISSN  0522-5094 .
  • Otto Baer: Considerations on urban development in Dresden in the fifties (named in the table of contents: Aspects of urban development in Dresden in the fifties). In: Dresdner Hefte. No. 28 (April 1991), ISBN 3-910055-12-5 .
  • Christine Hannemann: Industrialized housing in the GDR. Verlag Schiler, Berlin 2005, ISBN 3-89930-104-8 .
  • Tanja Scheffler: Charm and esprit instead of monotony. In: Wolfgang Kil (Ed.): Wolfgang Hänsch - Architect of Dresden Modernism. 2nd Edition. form + Zweck Verlag, Berlin 2009, ISBN 978-3-935053-53-2 .
  • Werner Durth , Jörn Düwel , Niels Gutschow : Architecture and urban planning of the GDR. Volume 1. Ostkreuz: People, Plans, Perspectives. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main / New York 1998, ISBN 3-593-35933-2 .
  • Thomas Topfstedt : The reconstruction of Dresden city center during the 1950s and 1960s. Urban patterns of post-war modernism in the GDR. In: Adrian von Buttlar , Christoph Heuter (Ed.): Denkmal! Modern. 1960s architecture. Rediscovery of an era. Jovis Verlag, Berlin 2007, ISBN 978-3-939633-40-2 .
  • Jan von Havranek: The new Dresden 1919–1949. Dissertation. Dresden 2001.
  • Holger Barth, Thomas Topfstedt a. a .: From building artist to complex designer. Architects in the GDR. Documentation of an IRS collection of biographical data (= series of documents of the IRS. Volume 3). Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner 2000, ISBN 3-934669-00-X .
  • Matthias Lerm: Farewell to old Dresden. Loss of historical building stock after 1945. Forum Verlag, Leipzig 1993, ISBN 3-86151-047-2 .
  • Wolfgang Kil , Wolfgang Hänsch: We had to get results! In: Wolfgang Kil (Ed.): Wolfgang Hänsch - Architect of Dresden Modernism. 2nd Edition. form + Zweck Verlag, Berlin 2009, ISBN 978-3-935053-53-2 .
  • Andreas Butter: Forest idyll and ribbon windows. Modernism in school building in the Soviet Zone / GDR from 1945 to 1951. In: Holger Barth (Hrsg.): Project Socialist City. Contributions to the building and planning history of the GDR. Dietrich Reimer Verlag, Berlin 1998, ISBN 3-496-01190-4 .
  • Susann Buttolo: No false solemnity, no hollow pathos. In: Wolfgang Kil (Ed.): Wolfgang Hänsch - Architect of Dresden Modernism. 2nd Edition. form + Zweck Verlag, Berlin 2009, ISBN 978-3-935053-53-2 .

Web links

Individual evidence

  1. ↑ Deutsche Architektur , 16th year 1967, p. 631.
  2. ^ Altner: Dresden. From the Royal Art Academy to the College of Fine Arts. 1990, p. 657.
  3. ^ Altner: Dresden. From the Royal Art Academy to the College of Fine Arts. 1990, p. 290.
  4. ↑ About the connections between culture, civilization and art. Architecture before the war and today. In: Wilhelm Kreis (=  New Work Art ). F. E. Hübsch, Berlin / Leipzig / Vienna 1927, pp. VIII, XII.
  5. ↑ Zentralblatt der Bauverwaltung , 54th year 1934, p. 247.
  6. ↑ Zentralblatt der Bauverwaltung , 55th year 1935, No. 31, pp. 593–602.
  7. ↑ Wolf: Gauforen - centers of power. On National Socialist architecture and urban planning. 1999, pp. 130-134.
  8. ^ Hirschmann: The Dresden competition. In: Deutsche Bauzeitung. Year 1935, issue 25, p. 483 f.
  9. ^ Entry in the Dresden address book 1938, p. 845 ( digitized version ).
  10. ↑ Deutsche Bauzeitung , year 1939, No. 8, p. 254.
  11. ^ Matthias Donath: Architecture in Dresden 1933-1945 . S. 99-101 .
  12. ↑ Deutsche Bauzeitung , year 1939, No. 73, p. #.
  13. ↑ Baugilde , 21st year 1939, issue 3, p. #.
  14. ↑ Baugilde 1939, issue 10 . S. 357 .
  15. ^ Roth: Dresden annual show "Garden and Home". In: interior decoration. Year 1937, p. 248 f.
  16. ^ Die Kunst , 79th year 1939, p. 79.
  17. ^ Altner: Dresden. From the Royal Art Academy to the College of Fine Arts. 1990, p. 360.
  18. ^ Altner: Dresden. From the Royal Art Academy to the College of Fine Arts. 1990, pp. 372, 657.
  19. ↑ Barth et al.: From building artist to complex designer. Architects in the GDR. Documentation of an IRS collection of biographical data. 2000, p. 9.
  20. ↑ Barth et al.: From building artist to complex designer. Architects in the GDR. Documentation of an IRS collection of biographical data. 2000, p. 10.
  21. ↑ Deutsche Architektur , 16th year 1967, p. 631.
  22. ^ Hannemann: Industrialized housing in the GDR. 2005, p. 67.
  23. ^ Butter: Forest idyll and ribbon of windows. Modernism in school building in the Soviet Zone / GDR from 1945 to 1951. In: Socialist City project. Contributions to the building and planning history of the GDR. 1998, p. 83.
  24. ↑ Baer: Considerations on urban development in Dresden in the fifties. In: Dresdner Hefte. No. 28 (April 1991), p. 32.
  25. ↑ Werner Durth among other things: Architecture and urban development of the GDR. Volume 1. Ostkreuz: People, Plans, Perspectives. 1998, p. 209.
  26. ↑ Baer: Considerations on urban development in Dresden in the fifties. In: Dresdner Hefte. No. 28 (April 1991), p. 32.
  27. ^ German architecture. 16th year 1967, p. 631.
  28. ↑ Baer: Considerations on urban development in Dresden in the fifties. In: Dresdner Hefte. No. 28 (April 1991), p. 32.
  29. ↑ Werner Durth among other things: Architecture and urban development of the GDR. Volume 1. Ostkreuz: People, Plans, Perspectives. 1998, p. 347.
  30. ↑ Werner Durth among other things: Architecture and urban development of the GDR. Volume 1. Ostkreuz: People, Plans, Perspectives. 1998, p. 332 f.
  31. ↑ Werner Durth among other things: Architecture and urban development of the GDR. Volume 1. Ostkreuz: People, Plans, Perspectives. 1998, pp. 334, 336 f.
  32. ^ Matthias Lerm: Farewell to old Dresden. Loss of historical building stock after 1945. 1993, p. 244, note 2.
  33. ↑ Deutsche Architektur , 16th year 1967, p. 631.
  34. ↑ Wolfgang Kil: We had to get results! 2009, p. 20.
  35. ↑ Werner Durth among other things: Architecture and urban development of the GDR. Volume 1. Ostkreuz: People, Plans, Perspectives. 1998, p. 353.
  36. ^ Terpitz in: German architecture. 9th year 1960, issue 4, p. 191.
  37. ^ Thomas Topfstedt: The reconstruction of the Dresden city center during the 1950s and 1960s. Urban patterns of post-war modernism in the GDR. In: denkmal! Modern. 1960s architecture. Rediscovery of an era. 2007, p. 71.
  38. ^ Herbert Terpitz: Construction of Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse in Dresden. In: German architecture. 9th year 1960, issue 4, p. #.
  39. ↑ May et al.: Architectural Guide GDR, Dresden District. 1979, p. 24, no. 8 (Neues Rathaus, Dr. – Külz – Ring 19).
  40. ^ Matthias Lerm: Farewell to old Dresden. Loss of historical building stock after 1945. 1993, p. 142.
  41. ↑ a b German architecture , 16th year 1967, p. 631.
  42. ↑ a b Neues Deutschland from June 28, 1966.
  43. ↑ Zentralblatt der Bauverwaltung , 54th year 1934, p. 247.
  44. ↑ Wolf: Gauforen - centers of power. On National Socialist architecture and urban planning. 1999, pp. 130-134.
  45. ^ Hirschmann: The Dresden competition. In: Deutsche Bauzeitung. Year 1935, issue 25, p. 483 f.
  46. ↑ Deutsche Bauzeitung , year 1939, No. 8, p. 254.
  47. ^ Matthias Donath: Architecture in Dresden 1933-1945 . 2007, p. 99-101 .
  48. ^ Roth: Dresden annual show "Garden and Home". In: interior decoration. Year 1937, p. 248 f.
  49. ↑ Bautennachweis In: DBZ 1938, Issue 23, June 8, B637
  50. ↑ Bautennachweis In: DBZ 1938, Issue 32, August 10, B857
  51. ↑ Deutsche Bauzeitung , year 1939, No. 73, p. #.
  52. ^ Matthias Donath: Architecture in Dresden 1933-1945 . 2007, p. 99-101 .
  53. ↑ Werner Durth among other things: Architecture and urban development of the GDR. Volume 1. Ostkreuz: People, Plans, Perspectives. 1998, p. 347.
  54. ↑ May et al.: Architectural Guide GDR, Dresden District. 1979, p. 24, No. 9 (Weisse Gasse 1-8).
  55. ↑ Scheffler: Charm and esprit instead of monotony. In: Wolfgang Hänsch - Architect of Dresden Modernism. 2009, p. 57.
  56. ^ Special housing program in Dresden-Johannstadt. In: German architecture. 6th year 1957, issue 3, p. 121 f.
  57. ↑ May et al.: Architectural Guide GDR, Dresden District. 1979, p. 24, no. 10 (residential buildings, Gewandhausstrasse 1-7).
  58. ^ Herbert Terpitz: Construction of Ernst-Thälmann-Strasse in Dresden. In: German architecture. 9th year 1960, issue 4, p. 191 f.
  59. ↑ May et al.: Architectural Guide GDR, Dresden District. 1979, p. 25, no. 12 (residential development Ringstr. 3–11, Ernst-Thälmann-Str. 3–7).
  60. ^ Buttolo: No false solemnity, no hollow pathos. In: Wolfgang Hänsch - Architect of Dresden Modernism. 2009, p. 101.
  61. ↑ May et al.: Architectural Guide GDR, Dresden District. 1979, p. 24, no. 8 (Neues Rathaus, Dr. – Külz – Ring 19).
  62. ↑ Deutsche Architektur , 16th year 1967, p. 631.
  63. ↑ Barth et al.: From building artist to complex designer. Architects in the GDR. Documentation of an IRS collection of biographical data. 2000, p. 33.
  64. ↑ Deutsche Architektur , 16th year 1967, p. 631.
  65. ↑ Barth et al.: From building artist to complex designer. Architects in the GDR. Documentation of an IRS collection of biographical data. 2000, p. 33.
  66. ↑ Deutsche Architektur , 16th year 1967, p. 631.
  67. ↑ a b German architecture , 16th year 1967, p. 631.
personal data
SURNAME Terpitz, Herbert
BRIEF DESCRIPTION German architect
DATE OF BIRTH March 8, 1903
PLACE OF BIRTH Radeberg
DATE OF DEATH June 18, 1967
Place of death Dresden