Think tank: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎External links: fixed Demos link
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Organization that performs policy research and advocacy}}
{{otheruses}}
{{About|a type of organisation|The decision production by special knowledge or specialist}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2022}}
[[File:Brookings Institute DC 2007.jpg|thumb|[[Brookings Institution]], founded in 1916 in [[Washington, D.C.]]]]
[[File:The heritage foundation building on mass. ave.jpg|thumb|[[The Heritage Foundation]], founded in 1973 in [[Washington, D.C.]]]]
[[File:Stanford University campus - Hoover Tower view 2014-05-19.JPG|thumb|[[Stanford University]]'s [[Hoover Institution]], founded in 1919 by U.S. President [[Herbert Hoover]]]]
A '''think tank''', or '''policy institute''', is a [[research institute]] that performs [[research]] and [[advocacy]] concerning topics such as [[social policy]], [[political strategy]], [[economics]], [[military]], [[technology]], and [[culture]]. Most think tanks are [[non-governmental organizations]], but some are semi-autonomous agencies within government, and some are associated with particular political parties, businesses or the military.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |last=Fang |first=Lee |date=15 September 2021 |title=Intelligence Contract Funneled to Pro-War Think Tank Establishment |url=https://theintercept.com/2021/09/15/pentagon-funding-think-tanks/ |access-date=9 October 2021 |website=The Intercept |language=en-US |archive-date=6 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211006152110/https://theintercept.com/2021/09/15/pentagon-funding-think-tanks/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Think tanks are often funded by individual donations, with many also accepting government grants.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=McGann |first1=James G. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KEsr4yEGZEsC&pg=PA51 |title=Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action |last2=Weaver |first2=Robert Kent |date=1 January 2002 |publisher=Transaction Publishers |isbn=978-1-4128-3989-1 |page=51 |language=en}}</ref>


Think tanks publish articles and studies, and sometimes draft [[legislation]] on particular matters of policy or society. This information is then used by governments, businesses, media organizations, [[social movement]]s or other interest groups.<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last1=Fischer |first1=Frank |title=Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods |last2=Miller |first2=Gerald J. |date=21 December 2006 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-1-4200-1700-7 |pages=149–157 |language=en |chapter=Public Policy Analysis and Think Tanks, by Diane Stone |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vAbOBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA149}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite book |last=Selee |first=Andrew Dan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=25iBPUBkSVwC&pg=PA41 |title=What Should Think Tanks Do?: A Strategic Guide to Policy Impact |date=31 July 2013 |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-8929-5 |page=41 |language=en}}</ref> Think tanks range from those associated with highly academic or scholarly activities to those that are overtly ideological and pushing for particular policies, with a wide range among them in terms of the quality of their research. Later generations of think tanks have tended to be more ideologically oriented.<ref name=":1" /> Modern think tanks began as a phenomenon in the United Kingdom in the 19th and early 20th centuries, with most of the rest being established in other English-speaking countries.<ref name=":1" /><ref name="McGann" /> Prior to 1945, they tended to focus on the economic issues associated with industrialization and urbanization. During the [[Cold War]], many more American and other [[Western world|Western]] think tanks were established, which often guided government Cold War policy.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Roberts |first=Priscilla |date=1 December 2015 |title=A century of international affairs think tanks in historical perspective |journal=International Journal |language=en |volume=70 |issue=4 |pages=535–555 |doi=10.1177/0020702015590591 |issn=0020-7020 |hdl-access=free |hdl=10722/210910 |s2cid=155138921}}</ref><ref name=":2" />
A '''think tank''' is an organization, institute, corporation, or group that conducts [[research]], typically funded by governmental and commercial clients, in the areas of social or political strategy, technology, and armament.<ref>see ''The American Heritage Dictionary.'' "Think Tank." 2000. and ''Merriam Webster's Dictionary.'' "Think Tank."</ref>


Since 1991, more think tanks have been established in non-Western parts of the world. More than half of all think tanks that exist today were established after 1980.<ref name="McGann" /> There are over 11,000 think tanks around the world.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |title=2013 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report|date=22 January 2014|last=G. McGann |first=James|url=http://gotothinktank.com/dev1/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/GoToReport2013.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112134808/http://gotothinktank.com/dev1/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/GoToReport2013.pdf|archive-date=12 January 2016|publisher=University of Pennsylvania}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite web |last=G. McGann |first=James |date=28 January 2022 |title=2020 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report |url=https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=think_tanks |access-date=28 September 2022 |website=[[University of Pennsylvania]] |archive-date=22 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210522000141/https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=think_tanks |url-status=live }}</ref>
==History of think tanks==
Since "think tank" is a term that has only found use since the 1950s, there is still some debate over what constitutes the first think tank. One candidate is the [[Fabian Society]] of Britain, founded in 1884 to promote gradual social change. The [[Brookings Institution]], founded in the US in 1916 is another candidate for the first think tank. The term think tank itself, however, was originally used in reference to organizations that offered military advice, most notably the [[RAND|RAND Corporation]], formed originally in 1946 as an offshoot of Douglas Aircraft and which became an independent corporation in 1948.


{{TOC limit}}
Until around 1970, there were no more than several dozen think tanks, mostly focused on offering non-partisan policy and military advice to the United States government, and generally with large staffs and research budgets. After 1970, the number of think tanks exploded, as many smaller new think tanks were formed to express various partisan, political, and ideological views.


===Etymology and usage===
== History ==
According to historian [[Jacob Soll]], while the term "think tank" is modern, with its origin "traced to the humanist academies and scholarly networks of the 16th and 17th centuries," Soll writes that, "in Europe, the origins of think tanks go back to the 800s when emperors and kings began arguing with the Catholic Church about taxes. A tradition of hiring teams of independent lawyers to advise monarchs about their financial and political prerogatives against the church spans from Charlemagne all the way to the 17th century, when the kings of France were still arguing about whether they had the right to appoint bishops and receive a cut of their income."
Until the 1940s, most think tanks were known only by the name of the institution. During the Second World War, think tanks were referred to as "brain boxes" after the slang term for the skull. The phrase "think tank" in wartime American slang referred to rooms in which strategists discussed war planning. The first recorded use of the phrase to refer to modern think tanks was in 1959, and by the 1960s the term was commonly used to describe [[RAND]] and other groups assisting the armed forces. In recent times, the phrase "think tank" has become applied to a wide range of institutions, and there are no precise definitions of the term. Marketing or public relations organizations, especially of an international character, sometimes refer to themselves as think tanks, for example.


Soll cites as an early example the {{lang|fr|Académie des frères Dupuy}}, created in Paris around 1620 by the brothers [[Pierre Dupuy (scholar)|Pierre]] and Jacques Dupuy and also known after 1635 as the {{lang|fr|cabinet des frères Dupuy}}.<ref name="Soll">{{Cite news |title=How Think Tanks Became Engines of Royal Propaganda |first=Jacob |last=Soll |work=Tablet Magazine |url=https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/history/articles/think-tanks-jacob-soll-propaganda |date=1 February 2017 |access-date=12 December 2021 |archive-date=12 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211212113234/https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/history/articles/think-tanks-jacob-soll-propaganda |url-status=live }}</ref> The [[Club de l'Entresol]], active in Paris between 1723 and 1731, was another prominent example of an early independent think tank focusing on public policy and current affairs, especially economics and foreign affairs.<ref>{{Citation |last=Pierre-Yves Beaurepaire |title=La France des Lumières 1715-1789 |date=2011 |pages=112–115 |place=Paris |publisher=Belin}}</ref>
==Types of think tanks==


===19th century===
Some think tanks are clearly aligned with conservative or libertarian approaches to the economy (The [[Cato Institute]], for example), while others, especially those with an emphasis on progressive social and environmental reforms are viewed as more liberal or left-of-center.
Several major current think tanks were founded in the 19th century. The [[Royal United Services Institute]] was founded in 1831 in [[London]], and the [[Fabian Society]] in 1884.


===20th century===
A new trend, resulting from [[globalisation]], is collaboration between think tanks across continents. For instance, the [[Brookings Institution]], Washington DC, collaborates with Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Qatar for an initiative on [[West-Islam relations]]. Also, in the area of West-Islam relations, [[Strategic Foresight Group]], a think tank based in India, works closely with the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats in the European Parliament. The [[World Economic Forum]] has created a Council of 100 Leaders on West-Islam relations, which brings together heads of major global think tanks ranging from [[Oxford Islamic Centre]] at [[Oxford University]] to [[Strategic Foresight Group]], [[Observer Research Foundation]], [[CSDS]], [[Centre for Policy Research]], [[ETC]] in Delhi of [[India]] and [[Al-Azhar University]] in Egypt.
The oldest [[United States]]-based think tank, the [[Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]], was founded in [[Washington, D.C.]], in 1910 by philanthropist [[Andrew Carnegie]]. Carnegie charged trustees to use the fund to "hasten the abolition of international war, the foulest blot upon our civilization."<ref>Edmund Jan Osmanczyk and Anthony Mango, ''Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements.'' London: Routledge, 2004.</ref> The [[Brookings Institution]] was founded shortly thereafter in 1916 by [[Robert S. Brookings]] and was conceived as a bipartisan "research center modeled on academic institutions and focused on addressing the questions of the federal government."<ref name="utnethinktank">{{Cite journal |last=Tevi Troy |date=May–June 2012 |title=No More Thinking With Think Tanks |url=http://www.utne.com/politics/think-tanks-zm0z12mjzros.aspx#ixzz2IZbPGmre |journal=Utne |access-date=20 January 2013 |archive-date=26 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130126092651/http://www.utne.com/politics/think-tanks-zm0z12mjzros.aspx#ixzz2IZbPGmre |url-status=live }}</ref>


In the early 1920s, [[Fascism|fascist]] and other [[Far-right politics|far-right]] think tanks appeared in [[Netherlands|the Netherlands]].<ref name=":02">{{Cite book |last=Rietbergen |first=P. J. A. N. |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/52849131 |title=A Short History of the Netherlands: From Prehistory to the Present Day |publisher=Bekking |year=2000 |isbn=90-6109-440-2 |edition=4th |location=Amersfoort |pages=141 |oclc=52849131}}</ref>
===United States think tanks===


After 1945, the number of policy institutes increased, with many small new ones forming to express various issues and policy agendas. Until the 1940s, most think tanks were known only by the name of the institution. During the Second World War, think tanks were often referred to as "brain boxes".<ref>{{Cite book |last=Stone |first=Diane |title=Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1136309045 |page=9}}</ref>
Think tanks in the [[United States]] play an important role in forming both [[foreign policy|foreign]] and [[domestic policy]]. Typically, an issue such as [[National Missile Defense|national missile defense]] will be debated within and among think tanks and the results of these debates will influence government [[policy]] makers. Think tanks in the United States generally receive funding from private donors, and members of private organization think tanks may feel more free to propose and debate controversial [[idea]]s than people within [[government]].


Before the 1950s, the phrase "think tank" did not refer to organizations. From its first appearances in the 1890s up to the 1950s, the phrase was most commonly used in [[American English]] to colloquially refer to the [[Neurocranium|braincase]] or especially in a pejorative context to the [[human brain]] itself when commenting on an individual's failings (in the sense that something was wrong with that person's "think tank").<ref name="Medvetz">{{Cite book |last=Medvetz |first=Thomas |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kuh_VuW1WisC&pg=PA25 |title=Think Tanks in America |date=2012 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=9780226517292 |location=Chicago |access-date=28 October 2020}}</ref>{{rp|25}} Around 1958, the first organization to be regularly described in published writings as "the Think Tank" (note the [[title case]] and the use of the [[Article (grammar)|definite article]]) was the [[Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences]].<ref name="Medvetz"/>{{rp|26}} However, the Center does not count itself as and is not perceived to be a think tank in the contemporary sense.<ref name="Medvetz"/>{{rp|26}} During the 1960s, the phrase "think tank" was attached more broadly to meetings of experts, [[Digital electronic computer|electronic computers]],<ref name="Medvetz"/>{{rp|27}} and independent military planning organizations.<ref name="Medvetz"/>{{rp|26}} The prototype and most prominent example of the third category was the [[RAND Corporation]], which was founded in 1946 as an offshoot of [[Douglas Aircraft]] and became an independent corporation in 1948.<ref name="Medvetz"/>{{rp|70}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fetherling |first=George |date=12 May 2008 |title=In the Tank |url=https://thewalrus.ca/2008-05-media/ |access-date=6 January 2020 |website=The Walrus |language=en-US |archive-date=17 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200417065212/https://thewalrus.ca/2008-05-media/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In the 1970s, the phrase became more specifically defined in terms of RAND and others.<ref name="Medvetz"/>{{rp|28}} During the 1980s and 1990s, the phrase evolved again to arrive at its broader contemporary meaning of an independent public policy research institute.<ref name="Medvetz"/>{{rp|28}}
Modern [[Neoconservatism in the United States|neoconservatism]] is associated with some of the foreign policy initiatives of think tanks such as the [[American Enterprise Institute]] (AEI) and the [[Project for the New American Century]] (PNAC). The [[Heritage Foundation]] is a more traditional [[conservatism|conservative]] policy think tank. On the other side of the political spectrum are think tanks such as the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI), [[Institute for Policy Studies]], the [[Progressive Policy Institute]] and the [[Center for American Progress]]. [[Economic Policy Institute]] is a prominent liberal think tank whose research emphasizes interests of low-income and middle-income workers. Other think tanks include [[Brookings Institution]], a center-left organization, the [[Cato Institute]], a libertarian or "free-market liberal" think tank, the [[Atlantic Council of the United States]] and [[Center for Strategic and International Studies]], non-partisan foreign policy-oriented organizations, the [[Institute for Collaborative Engagement]], a non-partisan internationally-focused organization, [[The Lincoln Square Institute]], a non-partisan presidential election forum, and the [[Mises Institute]], focusing on libertarian economic education. The [[Roosevelt Institution]] is pushing the think tank model by attempting to organize university and college student bodies into effective think tanks.


For most of the 20th century, such institutes were found primarily in the United States, along with much smaller numbers in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Western Europe. Although think tanks had also existed in [[Japan]] for some time, they generally lacked independence, having close associations with government ministries or corporations. There has been a veritable proliferation of "think tanks" around the world that began during the 1980s as a result of globalization, the end of the [[Cold War]], and the emergence of transnational problems. Two-thirds of all the think tanks that exist today were established after 1970 and more than half were established since 1980.<ref name="McGann">{{Cite web |last=McGann |first=James |title=Think Tanks and the Transnationalization of Foreign Policy |url=http://www.fpri.org/enotes/thinktanks.20021216.mcgann.transnationalforeignpolicy.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110629131900/http://www.fpri.org/enotes/thinktanks.20021216.mcgann.transnationalforeignpolicy.html |archive-date=29 June 2011 |publisher=Foreign Policy Research Institute }}</ref>
Though there are think tanks in every part of the political spectrum, conservative think tanks outnumber their centrist and liberal/progressive counterparts. For example, the media watchdog group [[Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting]] (FAIR) released a report in 2006 which listed the 25 think tanks which were mentioned most often in the mainstream media news in 2005. The most-mentioned think tank was the centrist or center-left [[Brookings Institution]]. The next two most-mentioned think tanks--the [[Heritage Foundation]], the [[American Enterprise Institute]], are conservative while the fourth, the [[Cato Institute]], is libertarian. Of the top ten think tanks, none were listed as "progressive" by FAIR, while five were listed as "conservative" or "conservative/libertarian." [http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2897]


The effect of [[Globalization|globalisation]] on the proliferation of think tanks is most evident in regions such as Africa, Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and parts of Southeast Asia, where there was a concerted effort by other countries to assist in the creation of independent public policy research organizations. A survey performed by the [[Foreign Policy Research Institute|Foreign Policy Research Institute's]] [[Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program]] underscores the significance of this effort and documents the fact that most of the think tanks in these regions have been established since 1992.
Government think tanks are also important in the United States, particularly in the security and defense field. These include the Institute for National Strategic Studies, Institute for Homeland Security Studies, and the Center for Technology and National Security Policy, at the [[National Defense University]]; the Center for Naval Warfare Studies at the [[Naval War College]] and the [[Strategic Studies Institute]] at the [[U.S. Army War College]].


===Chinese think tanks===
===21st century===
{{As of|2014|}}, there were more than 11,000 of these institutions worldwide.<ref name=":4" /><ref name=":5" /> Many of the more established think tanks, created during the [[Cold War]], are focused on international affairs, security studies, and foreign policy.<ref name="McGann" />


== Types ==
In the [[People's Republic of China]] a number of think tanks are sponsored by governmental agencies but still retain sufficient non-official status to be able to propose and debate ideas more freely. Indeed, most of the actual [[diplomacy]] between [[China]] and the [[United States]] has taken the form of academic exchanges between members of think tanks.
Think tanks vary by ideological perspectives, sources of funding, topical emphasis and prospective consumers.<ref name="Singer">{{Cite web |last=Singer |first=Peter |title=Washington's Think Tanks: Factories to Call Our Own |url=https://www.brookings.edu/articles/washingtons-think-tanks-factories-to-call-our-own/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100821094149/http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2010/0813_think_tanks_singer.aspx |archive-date=21 August 2010 |date=13 August 2010 |publisher=the Brookings Institution }}</ref> Funding may also represent who or what the institution wants to influence; in the United States, for example, "Some donors want to influence votes in Congress or shape public opinion, others want to position themselves or the experts they fund for future government jobs, while others want to push specific areas of research or education."<ref name="Singer" />


A new trend, resulting from globalization, is collaboration between policy institutes in different countries. For instance, the [[Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]] operates offices in [[Washington, D.C.]], [[Beijing]], [[Beirut]], [[Brussels]] and formerly in [[Moscow]], where it was closed in April 2022.<ref name="Singer" />
====Hong Kong think tanks====

*[[Civic Exchange]] co-founded by [[Christine Loh]] in 2000
The [[Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program]] (TTCSP) at the [[University of Pennsylvania]], led by [[James McGann]], annually rates policy institutes worldwide in a number of categories and presents its findings in the [[Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program#Global Go To Think Tank Index|Global Go-To Think Tanks]] rating index.<ref name="Go-To Think Tanks 2010">{{Cite web |last=McGann |first=James |title=The Global "Go-To Think Tanks" |url=http://www.fpri.org/research/thinktanks/GlobalGoToThinkTanks2010.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.fpri.org/research/thinktanks/GlobalGoToThinkTanks2010.pdf |archive-date=9 October 2022 |url-status=live |publisher=the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program}}</ref> However, this method of the study and assessment of policy institutes has been criticized by researchers such as Enrique Mendizabal and Goran Buldioski, Director of the Think Tank Fund, assisted by the [[Open Society Foundations|Open Society Institute]].<ref name="Mendizabal">{{Cite web |last=Mendizabal |first=Enrique |title=Another year, another ranking of think tanks (and surprise surprise, Brookings is still the best) |url=http://onthinktanks.org/2011/01/21/another-year-another-ranking-of-think-tanks-and-surprise-surprise-brookings-is-still-the-best/ |access-date=28 November 2011 |publisher=On Think Tanks |archive-date=11 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230311235713/https://onthinktanks.org/articles/another-year-another-ranking-of-think-tanks-and-surprise-surprise-brookings-is-still-the-best/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Buldioski">{{Cite web |last=Buldioski |first=Goran |title=Mirror, mirror on the wall... tell me who is the best think tank in the world? |url=http://goranspolicy.com/mirror-mirror-wall-tank-world/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120113024736/http://goranspolicy.com/mirror-mirror-wall-tank-world/ |archive-date=13 January 2012 |access-date=28 November 2011 |publisher=Goran's Musings}}</ref>
*[[Hong Kong Policy Research Institute Ltd.]]

*[[Hong Kong Transition Project]]
== Advocacy==
*[[HKU Pop Site]]
In some cases, corporate interests,<ref>{{Cite news |title=Researchers or Corporate Allies? Think Tanks Blur the Line; Think tanks are seen as independent, but their scholars often push donors' agendas, amplifying a culture of corporate influence in Washington. |newspaper=The New York Times |date=7 August 2016 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/us/politics/think-tanks-research-and-corporate-lobbying.html |access-date=7 August 2016 |last1=Lipton |first1=Eric |last2=Williams |first2=Brooke |archive-date=11 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190711035331/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/us/politics/think-tanks-research-and-corporate-lobbying.html |url-status=live }}</ref> military interests<ref name=":3" /> and political groups have found it useful to create policy institutes, advocacy organizations, and think tanks. For example, [[The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition]] was formed in the mid-1990s to dispute research finding an association between [[second-hand smoke]] and [[cancer]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ong |first1=Elisa K. |last2=Glantz |first2=Stanton A. |year=2001 |title=Constructing "Sound Science" and "Good Epidemiology": Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms |url=http://www.tobaccoscam.ucsf.edu/pdf/9.6-Ong%26Glantz-JunkScience.pdf |journal=American Journal of Public Health |volume=91 |issue=11 |pages=1749–1757 |doi=10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1749 |pmc=1446868 |pmid=11684593 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030411115538/http://www.tobaccoscam.ucsf.edu/pdf/9.6-Ong%26Glantz-JunkScience.pdf |archive-date=11 April 2003 |access-date=29 November 2011 }}</ref> Military contractors may spend a portion of their tender on funding pro-war think tanks.<ref name=":3" /> According to an internal memorandum from [[Philip Morris Companies]] referring to the [[United States Environmental Protection Agency]] (EPA), "The credibility of the EPA is defeatable, but not on the basis of ETS <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[environmental tobacco smoke]]<nowiki>]</nowiki> alone,... It must be part of a larger mosaic that concentrates all the EPA's enemies against it at one time."<ref>Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber [http://www.prwatch.org/files/pdfs/prwatch/prwv7n3.pdf "How Big Tobacco Helped Create 'the Junkman'"], Vol. 7, No. 3, ''PR Watch'', Third Quarter 2000, PRWatch.com</ref>
*[[One Country Two Systems Research Institute]]

*[[Social and Economic Policy Institute]]
According to the progressive media watchdog [[Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting|Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting]], both left-wing and right-wing policy institutes are often quoted and rarely identified as such. The result is that think tank "experts" are sometimes depicted as neutral sources without any ideological predispositions when, in fact, they represent a particular perspective.<ref>{{Cite web |date=22 February 1999 |title=What's in a Label? |url=http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1425 |access-date=29 July 2016 |publisher=FAIR |archive-date=8 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120908121324/http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1425 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=22 February 1999 |title=The Incredible Shrinking Think Tank |url=http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3322 |access-date=29 July 2016 |publisher=FAIR |archive-date=21 September 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120921233835/http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3322 |url-status=live }}</ref> In the United States, think tank publications on education are subjected to expert review by the [[National Education Policy Center]]'s "Think Twice" think tank review project.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Think Tank Review Project &#124; National Education Policy Center |url=http://nepc.colorado.edu/think-tank-review-project |access-date=2 November 2011 |publisher=Nepc.colorado.edu |archive-date=1 November 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111101185702/http://nepc.colorado.edu/think-tank-review-project |url-status=live }}</ref>
*[[SynergyNet]]

A 2014 ''[[New York Times]]'' report asserted that foreign governments buy influence at many United States think tanks. According to the article: "More than a dozen prominent Washington research groups have received tens of millions of dollars from foreign governments in recent years while pushing United States government officials to adopt policies that often reflect the donors' priorities."<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Eric Lipton |last2=Brooke Williams |last3=Nicholas Confessore |date=6 September 2014 |title=Foreign Powers Buy Influence at Think Tanks |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/07/us/politics/foreign-powers-buy-influence-at-think-tanks.html |access-date=6 December 2014 |archive-date=5 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141105155347/http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/07/us/politics/foreign-powers-buy-influence-at-think-tanks.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

== Global think tanks ==
{{Main|List of think tanks}}

=== African think tanks ===
==== Ghana ====
Ghana's first president, [[Kwame Nkrumah]], set up various state-supported think tanks in the 1960s. By the 1990s, a variety of policy research centers sprang up in Africa set up by academics who sought to influence public policy in Ghana.

One such think tank was [[The Institute of Economic Affairs, Ghana]], which was founded in 1989 when the country was ruled by the [[Provisional National Defence Council]]. The IEA undertakes and publishes research on a range of economic and governance issues confronting [[Ghana]] and [[Sub-Saharan Africa]]. It has also been involved in bringing political parties together to engage in dialogue. In particular it has organised Presidential debates every election year since the [[Ghanaian presidential election, 1996]].

Notable think tanks in Ghana include:
*[[IMANI Centre for Policy and Education]]
* [[The Institute of Economic Affairs, Ghana]] (IEA)

==== Morocco ====
* AMAQUEN,<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Think Tank of Quality Education - AMAQUEN Higher Education |url=https://amaquen.org/ |access-date=15 June 2021 |website=AMAQUEN |language=en-US |archive-date=16 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210616042944/https://amaquen.org/ |url-status=live }}</ref> founded in 2003, is a think tank in the field of education through its publications (rapports),<ref>{{Cite web |last=Naji |first=Abdennasser |date=1 December 2010 |title=Rapport sur la qualité du système d'éducation et de formation au Maroc |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341447163 |access-date=15 June 2021 |website=Researchgate }}</ref><ref name="educ">{{cite web |title=Nearly half of respondents in study admit to plagiarism |url=https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20220919092727585 |website=University World News |access-date=26 October 2022 |archive-date=26 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221026153537/https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20220919092727585 |url-status=live }}</ref> international scientific journal ''The Journal of'' ''Quality in Education,''<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Journal of Quality in Education |url=https://journal.amaquen.org/index.php/joqie |access-date=15 June 2021 |website=journal.amaquen.org |archive-date=16 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210616044636/https://journal.amaquen.org/index.php/joqie |url-status=live }}</ref> and international events (CIMQUSEF).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Naji |first=Abdennasser |title=The main determinants of improving learning outcomes: Analysis of PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS data |url=https://cimqusef.amaquen.ma/ |access-date=15 June 2021 |website=Cimqusef |archive-date=16 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210616043257/https://cimqusef.amaquen.ma/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
*

*

==== Somalia ====
* [[Heritage Institute for Policy Studies]]
* [[Puntland Development Research Center]]

==== South Africa ====
* [[Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa]]
* [[Free Market Foundation]]
* [[FW de Klerk Foundation]]
* [[Helen Suzman Foundation]]
* [[Institute for Democratic Alternatives in South Africa]] (IDASA)
* [[Institute for Justice and Reconciliation]]
* [[Institute for Security Studies]]
* [[South African Institute of International Affairs]] (SAIIA)
* [[South African Institute of Race Relations]]

=== Asian think tanks ===
==== Afghanistan ====
Afghanistan has a number of think tanks that are in the form of governmental, non-governmental, and corporate organizations.

*[[Afghanistan Analysts Network]]
*[[Centre for Conflict and Peace Studies]]

==== Bangladesh ====
Bangladesh has a number of think tanks that are in the form of governmental, non-governmental, and corporate organizations.

* [[Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies]] (BIDS)
* [[Bangladesh Institute of Law and International Affairs]] (BILIA)
* [[Bangladesh Institute of Peace & Security Studies|Bangladesh Institute of Peace and Security Studies]] (BIPSS)
* [[Centre for Policy Dialogue]] (CPD)
* [[International Growth Centre]] (IGC)
* [[Making Our Economy Right]] (MOER)
* [[Bangladesh Institute of Labour Studies]] (BILS)

==== China ====
In China a number of think tanks are sponsored by governmental agencies such as [[Development Research Center of the State Council]], but still retain sufficient non-official status to be able to propose and debate ideas more freely. In January 2012, the first non-official think tank in mainland China, South Non-Governmental Think-Tank, was established in the Guangdong province.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Linping |first=He |date=18 January 2012 |title=Nongovernmental think-tank inaugurated in Guangdong |url=http://en.people.cn/90882/7708858.html |access-date=30 May 2018 |website=People's Daily Online }}{{Dead link|date=June 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> In 2009 the [[China Center for International Economic Exchanges]] was founded.

===== Hong Kong =====
In Hong Kong, early think tanks established in the late 1980s and early 1990s focused on political development, including the first direct Legislative Council members election in 1991 and the political framework of "[[One Country, Two Systems]]", manifested in the [[Sino-British Joint Declaration]]. After the transfer of sovereignty to China in 1997, more think tanks were established by various groups of intellectuals and professionals. They have various missions and objectives including promoting civic education; undertaking research on economic, social and political policies; and promoting "public understanding of and participation in the political, economic, and social development of the Hong Kong [[Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China|Special Administrative Region]]".

Think tanks in Hong Kong include:
*[[Bauhinia Foundation Research Centre]]
*[[Business and Professionals Federation of Hong Kong]]
*[[Central Policy Unit]]
*[[Civic Exchange]]
*[[The Global Institute for Tomorrow]]
*[[HKGolden50]]
*[[Hong Kong Christian Industrial Committee]]
*[[Hong Kong Democratic Foundation]]
*[[Hong Kong People's Council on Housing Policy]]
*[[The Lion Rock Institute]]
*[[The Lion Rock Institute]]
*[[Savantas Policy Institute]]
*[[New Century Forum]]
*[[Our Hong Kong Foundation]]
In Hong Kong, those early think tanks established in the late 1980s and early 1990s including Hong Kong Transition Project, Hong Kong Democratic Foundation and The One Country Two Systems Research Institute focused on the political development including first direct Legislative Council members election in 1991 and the political framework of “One Country, Two Systems” manifested in the Sino-British Joint Declaration. After the return of sovereign to the Mainland China in 1997, more and more think tanks were established by various groups of intellectuals and professionals. They have various missions and objectives including promoting civic education; undertaking research on economic social and political policies (the mission of the Civic Exchange); promoting “public understanding of and participation in the political, economic, and social development of the Hong Kong SAR” (one of the objectives of Savantas).
*[[One Country Two Systems Research Institute]]
*[[Path of Democracy]]
*[[Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Unit]]
*[[Professional Commons]]


===European think tanks===
==== India ====
India has the world's second-largest [[List of think tanks in India|number of think tanks]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=31 January 2018 |title=2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report |url=https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=think_tanks |access-date=10 March 2018 |website=Think Tanks and Civil Societies Programs Univ. of Pennsylvania |publisher=Lauder Institute, University of Pennsylvania |archive-date=30 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330003743/https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=think_tanks |url-status=live }}</ref> Most are based in New Delhi, and a few are government-sponsored.{{Citation needed|date=July 2010}} There are few think tanks that promote environmentally responsible and climate resilient ideas like [[Centre for Science and Environment]], [[Centre for Policy Research]] and [[World Resources Institute]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=CSE top environment policy think tank in India; 16th in the world: Global Index |url=https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/environment/cse-top-environment-policy-think-tank-in-india-16th-in-the-world-global-index-59641#:~:text=Last%20Updated%3A%20Thursday%2008%20February,at%20the%20University%20of%20Pennsylvania |access-date=24 June 2020 |archive-date=25 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200625193507/https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/environment/cse-top-environment-policy-think-tank-in-india-16th-in-the-world-global-index-59641#:~:text=Last%20Updated%3A%20Thursday%2008%20February,at%20the%20University%20of%20Pennsylvania |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=CPR retains spot as leading India climate think tank for third year in a row &#124; Centre for Policy Research |date=21 December 2021 |url=https://www.cprindia.org/news/6296 |access-date=24 June 2020 |archive-date=25 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200625060454/https://www.cprindia.org/news/6296 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=About WRI India |url=https://wri-india.org/about |website=WRI INDIA |access-date=24 June 2020 |archive-date=7 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200707030645/https://wri-india.org/about |url-status=live }}</ref> There are other prominent think tanks like [[Observer Research Foundation]], Tillotoma Foundation and [[Centre for Civil Society]].{{Citation needed|date=December 2011}}


In Mumbai, [[Strategic Foresight Group]] is a global think tank that works on issues such as [[Water Diplomacy]], [[Peace and Conflict]] and [[Foresight (futures studies)]]. Think tanks with a development focus include those like the [[National Centre for Cold-chain Development]] ('NCCD'), which serve to bring an inclusive policy change by supporting the Planning Commission and related government bodies with industry-specific inputs – in this case, set up at the behest of the government to direct cold chain development. Some think tanks have a fixed set of focus areas and they work towards finding out policy solutions to social problems in the respective areas.
In [[United Kingdom|Britain]], think tanks play a similar role to the [[United States]], attempting to shape policy, and indeed there is some cooperation between British and American think tanks. Some of the major UK think tanks include [[Chatham House]], [[Policy Exchange]], the [[Globalisation Institute]], the [[Institute for Public Policy Research]], [[Demos (UK think tank)|Demos]], the [[Adam Smith Institute]], the [[Centre for Policy Studies]] and the [[Centre for European Reform]].


Initiatives such as [[National e-Governance Plan]] (to automate administrative processes)<ref name="PDF1">{{Cite web |title=NeGP overview |url=http://www.nisg.org/knowledgecenter_docs/A03060004.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140222224611/http://www.nisg.org/knowledgecenter_docs/A03060004.pdf |archive-date=22 February 2014 |access-date=1 March 2011}}</ref> and [[National Knowledge Network]] (NKN) (for data and resource sharing amongst education and research institutions), if implemented properly, should help improve the quality of work done by think tanks.<ref name="Why think tanks struggle in India">{{Cite news |date=21 May 2013 |title=Why think tanks struggle in India |url=http://www.firstpost.com/india/why-think-tanks-struggle-in-india-800929.html |access-date=13 September 2013 |archive-date=29 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140329082000/http://www.firstpost.com/india/why-think-tanks-struggle-in-india-800929.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
:''See also: [[List of UK think tanks]].''


Think tanks in India are growing across the length and breadth of the country as they are no longer limited to metro cities. Think tanks for the young, like RisingIndia ThinkTank, have emerged from one of the smallest city in Rajasthan state of India.
In [[Germany]] all of the major parties are loosely associated with research foundations that play some role in shaping policy, but generally from the more disinterested role of providing research to support policymakers than explicitly proposing policy. The foundations are:
*Associated with the [[Christian Democratic Union (Germany)|CDU]] is the [[Konrad Adenauer Foundation]] (in German, the ''Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung'');
*The [[Christian Social Union of Bavaria |CSU]] is associated with the [[Hanns-Seidel-Foundation|Hanns Seidel Foundation]] (''Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung'');
*The [[Social Democratic Party of Germany|SPD]] is associated with the [[Friedrich Ebert Foundation]] (''Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung'');
*The [[Free Democratic Party (Germany)]] is associated with the [[Friedrich Naumann Foundation]] (''Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung'');
*The [[Alliance '90/The Greens]] are associated with the [[Heinrich Böll Foundation]] (''Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung'');
*The [[Left Party (Germany)|Left Party]] is associated with the [[Rosa Luxemburg Foundation]] (''Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung'').


==== Indonesia ====
For a comprehensive list of German (and European) think tanks with information on organisation, funding, research areas and job opportunities visit the 'Think Tank Directory' [http://www.thinktankdirectory.org/]
* [[Centre for Strategic and International Studies]]
* [[Setara Institute]]


==== Iraq ====
In [[Italy]], in the [[Venices]], the [[Venezie Institute]] is the first free-market think tank, founded in 2005. It aims to bring about institutional, social and economic changes in the Venices based on the traditional Venetian principles of free enterprise, institutional integrity, limited government and individual liberty. It is completely independent of any political party, religious or economic interest group. Its motto: "Pro Bono Publico".
Over 50 think tanks have emerged in Iraq, particularly in the Kurdistan Region. Iraq's leading think tank is the Middle East Research Institute (MERI),<ref>{{Cite web |title=MERI - Middle East Research Institute |url=http://www.meri-k.org/ |website=www.meri-k.org |access-date=13 February 2018 |archive-date=13 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180213135150/http://www.meri-k.org/ |url-status=live }}</ref> based in Erbil. MERI is an independent non-governmental policy research organization, established in 2014 and publishes in English, Kurdish, and Arabic. It was listed in the global ranking by the United States's Lauder Institute of the [[University of Pennsylvania]] as 46th in the Middle East.<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=think_tanks |title=2016 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report |journal=TTCSP Global Go to Think Tank Index Reports |publisher=University of Pennsylvania |date=2017 |first=James G. |last=McGann |access-date=19 July 2022 |archive-date=30 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191030061654/http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=think_tanks |url-status=live }}</ref>


==== Israel ====
In [[Spain]], think tanks are progressively raising their public profile. The most influential Spanish think tank is the [[Elcano Royal Institute]], created in 2001 following the example of the Royal Institute of International Affairs ([[Chatham House]]) in the UK, and linked to the Government in power. More independent and also influential are the [[Cidob Foundation|CIDOB]] founded in 1973; and [[FRIDE]] (''Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior'') established in 1999 and main driving force behind projects such as the [[Club de Madrid]], a group of democratic former heads of state and government (including Clinton, Gorbachev, Cardoso or Delors) who provide counsel to governments and institutions all over the world or the [[Foreign Policy Spanish Edition]]. Former [[Prime Minister]] [[Jose Maria Aznar]] presides over the FAES ''[[Fundacion para el Analisis y los Estudios Sociales]]'', a think tank that is associated with the [[People's Party (Spain)|Partido Popular]].
There are many think tank teams in Israel, including:<ref>{{Cite web |title=Think Tanks in Israel &#124; Jewish Federations of North America |url=http://www.jewishfederations.org/Think-Tanks-In-Israel.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120203000116/http://www.jewishfederations.org/Think-Tanks-In-Israel.aspx |archive-date=3 February 2012 |access-date=2 November 2011 |publisher=Jewishfederations.org }}</ref>
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
* [[Shaharit (NPO)|Shaharit - Creating Common Cause]]
* [[Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies]] (JIMS)
* [[Reut Institute]]
* [[Israel Council on Foreign Relations]]
* [[Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs|The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs]]
* [[Adva Center]]
* [[Israel Democracy Institute]]
* [[Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research]]
* [[Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute]]
* [[Floersheimer Studies]] at the [[Hebrew University of Jerusalem]]
* [[Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace]], The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
* [[International Institute for Counter-Terrorism]] – IDC [[Herziliya]]
* [[Israel Center for Third Sector Research]], [[Ben Gurion University]] of the [[Negev]]
* [[IPCRI – Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information]]
* [[The Milken Institute]]
* [[Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies]], [[Tel Aviv University]]
* [[The Begin-Sadat Center]] – [[Bar Ilan University]]
* [[The Center for the Study of Philanthropy in Israel]] at the [[Hebrew University of Jerusalem]]
* [[Israel Institute for Advanced Studies]] at the [[Hebrew University of Jerusalem]]
* [[The Jewish Arab Center]] (JAC), [[University of Haifa]]
* [[The Jewish People Policy Institute]] (JPPI)
* [[The Shalem Center]]
* [[Institute for National Security Studies (Israel)|Institute for National Security Studies]], affiliated with Tel Aviv University.
{{div col end}}


==== South Korea ====
In [[Switzerland]], [[Avenir Suisse]] (which proposes a free-market liberalism agenda) is the only think tank that is currently active.
In [[South Korea]], think tanks are prolific and influential and are a government go-to. Think tanks are prolific in the Korean landscape. Many policy research organisations in Korea focus on economoy and most research is done in public think tanks. There is a strong emphasis on the knowledge-based economy and, according to one respondent, think tank research is generally considered high quality. <ref>{{Cite web |date=November 18, 2022 |title=Think tank landscape scan 2022 Korea |url=https://onthinktanks.org/articles/think-tank-landscape-scan-2022-korea/ |access-date= |website=A Global Consultancy and Paltform for Change}}</ref>
* [[Korea Development Institute]]
* [[National Assembly Budget Office]]
* [[The Asan Institute for Policy Studies]]
* [[Samsung Economic Research Institute]]
* [[Center for Free Enterprise]]
* [[Korea International Trade Association]]
* [[The Yeouido Institute]]
* [[The Economic Information and Education Center]]
* [[Jeju Peace Institute]]
* [[Korea Institute for International Economic Policy]]
* [[Korea Institute of Public Administration]]
* [[Sejong Institute]]


==== Japan ====
In [[Denmark]], the [[Copenhagen Institute]] is the first free-market think tank, founded in 2003. In [[2004]] high-profile representatives of Danish academia, business, media and the arts founded the free-market think tank [[CEPOS]], which has had enormous success in setting a new agenda in the Danish welfare debate.
[[Japan]] has over 100 think tanks, most of which cover not only policy research but also economy, technology and so on. Some are government related, but most of the think tanks are sponsored by the private sector.{{Citation needed|date=May 2021}}
* [[Asian Development Bank Institute]]
* [[Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry]]
* [[Genron NPO]]
* [[Global Industrial and Social Progress Research Institute]]
* [[Institute for International Monetary Affairs]]
* [[Institute of Developing Economies]]
* [[The International Academic Forum]]
* [[Japan Center for International Exchange]]
* [[Japan Institute for National Fundamentals]]
* [[Japan Institute of International Affairs]]
* [[Mitsubishi Research Institute]]
* [[National Institute for Research Advancement]]
* [[Rousoukai]]
* [[Shōwa Kenkyūkai]]
* [[Tokyo Foundation]]


==== Kazakhstan ====
In [[Portugal]], a very important think tank, is Compromisso Portugal, based on young entrepreneurs and academists aiming to contribute to the debate of ideas how to develop Portugal.
Institute of World Economics and Politics (IWEP) at [[the Foundation of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan]] was created in 2003. IWEP activities aimed at research problems of the world economy, international relations, geopolitics, security, integration and Eurasia, as well as the study of the First President of the [[Republic of Kazakhstan]] and its contribution to the establishment and strengthening of Kazakhstan as an independent state, the development of international cooperation and the promotion of peace and stability.<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 September 2014 |title=Об ИМЭП &#124; Институт мировой экономики и политики |url=http://iwep.kz/ob-imep |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140513005227/http://iwep.kz/ob-imep |archive-date=13 May 2014 |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Iwep.kz |language=ru}}</ref><ref name="IWEP roundtable">{{cite news |last1=Bulatkulova |first1=Saniya |title=Central Asian Cooperation: Experts Outline the Benefits and Risks |url=https://astanatimes.com/2022/08/central-asian-cooperation-experts-outline-the-benefits-and-risks/ |access-date=7 October 2022 |work=The Astana Times |date=19 August 2022 |language=en |archive-date=7 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221007145827/https://astanatimes.com/2022/08/central-asian-cooperation-experts-outline-the-benefits-and-risks/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


The Kazakhstan Institute for Strategic Studies under the President of the RK (KazISS) was established by the Decree of the President of RK on 16 June 1993. Since its foundation the main mission of the Kazakhstan Institute for Strategic Studies under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as a national think tank, is to maintain analytical and research support for the President of Kazakhstan.<ref>{{Cite web |date=3 January 2007 |title=Официальный сайт КИСИ при Президенте Республики Казахстан: Краткая информация об Институте |url=http://www.kisi.kz/site.html?id=5 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070103031611/http://www.kisi.kz/site.html?id=5 |archive-date=3 January 2007}}</ref>
In [[Greece]], the [[Panhellenic Socialist Movement]]([[PASOK]]), is affiliated with the '[[Institute of Developing Policies]], [[Andreas Papandreou]]', [[ΙΣΤΑΜΕ]].


==== Malaysia ====
After the fall of the [[Iron Curtain]], [[Eastern Europe]] has seen a number of new think tanks arise and some of them are already playing a role in the forming of government policy.
Most Malaysian think tanks are related either to the government or a political party. Historically they focused on defense, politics and policy. However, in recent years, think tanks that focus on international trade, economics, and social sciences have also been founded.


Notable think tanks in Malaysia include:
In [[Poland]], there are several think tanks. The most known of them are [[Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych]], [[Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich]], [[Instytut Spraw Publicznych]], [[DemosEuropa]] and [[Instytut Sobieskiego]]. Think tanks connected with economical reforms are the liberal [[Centrum im. Adama Smitha]], [[Centrum Analiz Społeczno-Ekonomicznych (CASE)]].


*[[Academy of Sciences Malaysia]] (ASM)
===Russian think tanks===
*[[Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs]] (IDEAS)
*[[Institute for Pioneering of Education and Economic Excellence]] (INSPIRE)
*[[Maritime Institute of Malaysia]] (MIMA)
*[[Jauhar Academy of Social Sciences]] (JASS)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Jauhar Academy of Social Sciences (JASS) 柔佛社会科学院 |url=https://jauhar.my/ |access-date=19 March 2022 |publisher=Jauhar.my |archive-date=15 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220315212751/https://jauhar.my/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=24 November 2020 |title=King and People are Inseparable: Proactive Constitutional Monarch in Parliamentary System |url=https://stratsea.com/king-and-people-are-inseparable-proactive-constitutional-monarch-in-parliamentary-system/ |access-date=6 May 2021 |archive-date=6 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210506090616/https://stratsea.com/king-and-people-are-inseparable-proactive-constitutional-monarch-in-parliamentary-system/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
*[[Jeffrey Cheah Institute on Southeast Asia]] (JCI)
*[[Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology]] (MIGHT)
*[[Islamic Renaissance Front]] (IRF)


==== Pakistan ====
Russian think tanks have experienced a precipitous decline over the past five years. Think tanks under the [[Soviet Union]], analogous to their American counterparts, grew to play a significant role in strategic policy formation. During the era of [[glasnost]], begun by Soviet leader [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] and continuing under Russian President [[Boris Yeltsin]], public think tanks and policy organizations underwent a brief blooming. However, as economic problems intensified under Yeltsin, and political pressure on public organizations grew under President [[Vladimir Putin]], most of the Russian think tanks have withered away while those who stood closer to Kremlin saw a recent revival.
{{See also|List of research institutes in Pakistan}}
Pakistan's think tanks mainly revolve around social policy, internal politics, foreign security issues, and regional geo-politics. Most of these are centered on the capital, [[Islamabad]]. One such think tank is the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), which focuses on policy advocacy and research particularly in the area of environment and social development.


Another policy research institute based in Islamabad is the [[Institute of Social and Policy Sciences]] (I-SAPS) which works in the fields of education, health, disaster risk reduction, [[governance]], conflict and stabilization. Since 2007 - 2008, I-SAPS has been analyzing public expenditure of federal and provincial governments.<ref name="isap">{{cite news |last1=Khan |first1=Javed |title=KP continues to increase spending on education |url=https://dailytimes.com.pk/70136/kp-continues-to-increase-spending-on-education/ |access-date=12 October 2022 |work=Daily Times |date=14 July 2016 |archive-date=12 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221012160859/https://dailytimes.com.pk/70136/kp-continues-to-increase-spending-on-education/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
===Turkish think tanks===


==== Philippines ====
Think tanks in Turkey are relatively new business. Many of them are sister organisations of a political party or a company. University think tanks are not typical think tanks. Turkish think tanks provide research and ideas yet they play less important roles in policy making when compared with the American think tanks. Among the most important think tanks in Turkey are the following:
Think tanks in the Philippines could be generally categorized in terms of their linkages with the national government. Several were set up by the Philippine government for the specific purpose of providing research input into the policy-making process.<ref>{{Cite web |title=NIRA Review Winter 1999: A Look at Think Tanks in the Philippines by Herman Joseph S. Kraft |url=http://www.nira.or.jp/past/publ/review/99winter/kraft.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121111024316/http://www.nira.or.jp/past/publ/review/99winter/kraft.html |archive-date=11 November 2012 |access-date=14 June 2013 |publisher=Nira.or.jp}}</ref>


==== Russia ====
*[[SAREM]] (Ankara) is one of the more influential think-tanks in Turkey. It is close to Turkish Armed Forces. It has a well-connected network of individuals, and has members from both the military and Turkish academics.
*[[TESEV]] (Istanbul) is a liberal research center in Istanbul. Despite a great amount of influence and reach among the business elites and public opinion, it has a lesser affect on political circles.
*[[USAK]] (Ankara) In English, the organization calls itself International Strategic Research Organization, ISRO. On the website, it is claimed that "ISRO is not intended to be a forum for single-issue advocacy or lobbying." It was established in 2004 and is an umbrella organization with 9 research centers. It is liberal and close to the Turkish diplomatic circles, military and political circles. Sponsored by the business community and member donations.
*[[SETA]] (Ankara) Established in 2006 and suspected of being close to the Turkish Government. It is known to be conservative.
*[[ASAM]] (Ankara) Nationalist and militarist. Sponsored by the nationalist military circles and close to certain factions within the Turkish Armed Forces. The acronym stands for 'Eurasia Strategic Research Center' in Turkish.
*[[TASAM]] (Istanbul) stands for Turkish Asian Center for Strategic Studies
*[[TUSAM]] (Ankara) [[Leftist]] [[nationalist]] is the Strategic Research Center for National Security. It is close to the leftist, nationalist military circles.
*[[TEPAV]] (Ankara) Economic Policy Resarch Institute Established in 2004. Supported by The Union of Chambers of Turkey (TOBB). Working on economy, foreign policy and governance issues. Close to business world and has liberal way of thinking. It has a wide public following and some degree of policy influence.


* [[Valdai Discussion Club]]
===Iranian think tanks===
* [[Izborsky Club]]
[[Econotrend]] is an Iranian thinktank headed by [[Seyed Muhammad Adeli]].
[ASEF] is the oldest think tank in Iran. {{Fact|date=February 2007}}


===Brazilian think tanks===
==== Sri Lanka ====
Sri Lanka has a number of think tanks that are in the form of governmental, non-governmental and corporate organizations.
*[[Instituto Liberdade]] Instituto Liberdade is a conservative/libertarian Brazilian Think Tank, formed by intellectual entrepreneurs and funded by private sources.
*The [[Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute of International Relations and Strategic Studies]] is a policy-studies institute that is often referred to as a think tank.
*[[LIRNEasia]] is a think tank working across the Asia-Pacific on regulatory and policy issues. Their main focus is the ICT sector, although they do work in other sectors, such as agriculture and health, which can benefit from ICT.
*[[Verité Research]] is an interdisciplinary think tank in Colombo.


=== Australian think tanks ===
==== Singapore ====
There are several think tanks in Singapore that advise the government on various policies and as well as private ones for corporations within the region. Many of them are hosted within the local public educational institutions.
Most Australian think tanks are based at universities - for example, the [[The Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research|Melbourne Institute]] - or are government funded - for example, the [[Productivity Commission]] or the [[CSIRO]].


Among them are the [[Singapore Institute of International Affairs]] (SIIA), [[Institute of Southeast Asian Studies]] (ISEAS), and the [[S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2 February 2016 |title=Singapore Institute of International Affairs top local think tank: Ranking |url=http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/singapore-institute-of/2480008.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160203090319/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/singapore-institute-of/2480008.html |archive-date=3 February 2016 |access-date=29 July 2016 |publisher=Channel NewsAsia}}</ref>
There are also about 20-30 "independent" Australian think tanks, which are funded by private sources. The best-known of these are:
*The Evatt Foundation
*The [[Australia Institute]]
*The [[Centre for Independent Studies]]
*The [[Institute of Public Affairs]]
*The [[Lowy Institute]]
*The [[Committee for Economic Development of Australia]]
*The [[Sydney Institute]]
*The [[National Civic Council (NCC)]]
*The [[Australian Institute of Employment Rights]]


====Taiwan====
Think tanks play much more limited role on Australian public and business policy making than in the [[United States]]. However, in the past decade the number of think tanks has increased substantially.
In 2017 Taiwan had 58 think tanks.<ref>{{Cite web |last=McGann |first=James G. |title=2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report |url=https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=think_tanks |access-date=27 September 2018 |website=upenn.edu |publisher=University of Pennsylvania |archive-date=30 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330003743/https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=think_tanks |url-status=live }}</ref> As in most countries there is a mix of government- and privately-funded think tanks.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation launched |url=https://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=1EADDCFD4C6EC567&s=3FA3B2386555E539 |access-date=27 September 2018 |publisher=Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of China (Taiwan) |archive-date=6 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181106122307/https://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=1EADDCFD4C6EC567&s=3FA3B2386555E539 |url-status=live }}</ref>


Taiwanese think tanks in alphabetical order:
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) is also now active.
* [[Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research]]
* [[Institute for National Defense and Security Research]]
* [[Prospect Foundation]]
* [[Taiwan Asia Exchange Foundation]]
* [[Taiwan Competitiveness Forum]]
* [[Taiwan Foundation for Democracy]]
* [[Taiwan Institute of Economic Research]]


===New Zealand think tanks===
==== Thailand ====
*[[Thailand Development Research Institute]]
The [[Centre for Strategic Studies New Zealand]] exists within [[Victoria University of Wellington]]. There is also the [[Maxim Institute]] in Auckland.
*[[iLaw]]


==== United Arab Emirates ====
The UAE has been a center for political oriented think tanks which concentrate on both regional and global policy. Notable think tank have emerged in the global debate on terrorism, education & economical policies in the MENA region. Think tanks include:


*[[Al Mesbar Studies and Research Centre]]
=== Canadian Think Tanks ===
*[[Dubai Economic Council]]
*[[Gulf Research Center]]
*[[Orient Research Centre]]


==== Uzbekistan ====
*Asia Pacific Foundation
* CED<ref>{{Cite web |title=Центр содействия экономическому развитию в Узбекистане |url=http://www.ced.uz/ |access-date=2 November 2011 |publisher=Ced.uz |archive-date=21 September 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110921155641/http://www.ced.uz/ |url-status=live }}</ref> – [[Center for Economic Development]] (Центр Содействия Экономическому Развитию) is a think tank whose major tasks are: analytic support in economic reforming and development in Uzbekistan; improving knowledge and skills of the subjects of economic development; assistance in productive dialogue between the government, civil society and private sectors on the economic development matters.
*Atlantic Institute for Market Studies
Key projects: Preparation of the National human development report for Uzbekistan, Sociological "portrait" of the Uzbek businessman, Preparation of an analytical report on export procedures optimization in Uzbekistan,
*Atlantic Provinces Economic Council
various industry and marketing researches in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan.
*[[Caledon Institute of Social Policy]]
*Canada West Foundation
*Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
*Canadian Economics Association
*Canadian Labour and Business Centre
*Canadian Institute of Advanced Research
*Canadian Policy Research Networks
*C.D. Howe Institute
*Le Centre canadien d’étude et coopération internationale
*Centre for Cultural Renewal
*Centre for Foreign Policy Studies
*Centre for International Governance Innovation
*Centre for Trade Policy and Law
*Centre for the Study of Living Standards
*Centre on Governance
*Chantier de l'économie sociale
*The Commonwealth Centre for Electronic Governance
*Conference Board of Canada
*Couchiching Institute of Public Affairs
*Fireweed Democracy Project
*Fraser Institute
*GPI Atlantic
*Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
*Institute for Citizen-Centred Service
*Institute for Research on Public Policy
*Institute for Canadian Values
*Institute of Public Administration of Canada
*Institute on Governance
*Liu Centre for the Study of Global Issues
*Mackenzie Institute
*Metamode Institute on Public Policy
*Montreal Economic Institute
*North-South Institute
*The Parliamentary Centre
*Pearson-Shoyama Institute
*Public Policy Forum
*Transportation Research Board
*Unisféra International Centre
*Work Research Foundation


=== European think tanks ===
==Criticism==
==== Belgium ====
Critics such as [[Ralph Nader]] have suggested that because of the private nature of the funding of think tanks their results are biased to a varying degree. Some argue members will be inclined to promote or publish only those results that ensure the continued flow of funds from private donors. This risk of distortion similarly threatens the reputation and integrity of organizations such as [[universities]], once considered to stand wholly within the [[public sector]]. Defenders state that think tanks arose to challenge the liberal orthodoxy of the universities in place starting in the 1970s.
[[Brussels]] hosts most of the European Institutions, hence a large number of international think tanks are based there. Notable think tanks are [[Bruegel (institution)|Bruegel]], the [[Centre for European Policy Studies]] (CEPS), [[Centre for the New Europe]] (CNE), the [[ECIPE|European Centre of International Political Economy]] (ECIPE), the [[European Policy Centre]] (EPC), the [[Friends of Europe]], the [[Global Governance Institute]] (GGI), [[Liberales]], and [[Sport and Citizenship]], among others.


==== Bulgaria ====
Some critics go further to assert think tanks are little more than propaganda tools for promoting the ideological arguments of whatever group established them. They charge that most think tanks, which are usually headquartered in state or national seats of [[government]], exist merely for large-scale [[lobbying]] to form opinion in favor of special private interests. They give examples such as organizations calling themselves think tanks having hosted lunches for politicians to present research that critics claim is merely in the political interest of major global interests such as [[Microsoft]], but that the connections to these interests are never disclosed. They charge, as another example, that the [[RAND|RAND Corporation]] issues research reports on [[National Missile Defense|national missile defense]] that accelerate investment into the very military products being produced by the military manufacturers who control RAND. Critics assert that the status of most think-tanks as [[Non-profit organization|non-profit]] and [[Tax exemption|tax exempt]] makes them an even more efficient tool to put [[Interest group|special interest]] money to work.
Bulgaria has a number of think tanks providing expertise and shaping policies, including [[Institute of Modern Politics]].


==== Czech Republic ====
In recent years, many think tanks have begun to promote causes which are contrary to established scientific opinion. For example, [[The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition]] was formed in the mid 1990s as part of the tobacco industry's attempt to cast doubt on [[EPA]] studies showing that secondhand smoke could cause cancer.[http://www.tobaccoscam.ucsf.edu/pdf/9.6-Ong%26Glantz-JunkScience.pdf] According to an internal memo from Philip Morris, "the credibility of the EPA is defeatable, but not on the basis of ETS (environmental tobacco smoke) alone. It must be part of a larger mosaic that concentrates all the EPA's enemies against it at one time." [http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2000Q3/junkman.html]
* The [[European Values Think-Tank]]<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Cisar |first=Ondrej |title=Think Tank and Policy Discourses in the Czech Republic |url=https://www.academia.edu/9354764 |website=Academia |access-date=2 September 2015 |archive-date=28 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211228184044/https://www.academia.edu/9354764 |url-status=live }}</ref>
* The [[Prague Security Studies Institute]] (PSSI)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Prague Security Studies Institute |url=https://pssi.cz/ |publisher=Pssi.cz |access-date=19 March 2022 |archive-date=19 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220319153959/https://www.pssi.cz/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


==== Denmark ====
The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition has also worked to cast doubt on the [[Scientific opinion on climate change|scientific consensus regarding human-caused global warming]], as have a number of conservative think tanks such as the [[American Enterprise Institute]], the [[Heritage Foundation]], the [[Cato Institute]], the [[Hoover Institution]], and the [[Competitive Enterprise Institute]]--all of whom receive large contributions from petroleum industry companies like [[ExxonMobil]] and the [[Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation]].[http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipientsoffunder.php?funderID=9][http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2005/05/exxon_chart.html][http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=9][http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=42][http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=21][http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=43][http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=2]
* [[CEPOS]] is a classic liberal/free-market conservative think tank in Denmark.


==== Finland ====
Finally, the [[Discovery Institute]] has been instrumental in putting the idea of [[Intelligent design]] into public debate, even though most biologists do not accept the theory as scientific.[http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/0605/discovery-darwin.php][http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/21/national/21evolve.html?ei=5088&en=24bc7c9b16cac8a8&ex=1282276800&adxnnl=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1153847061-CiDbGlyWpcFu/fSPeIwiAg][http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v434/n7037/full/4341062a.html]
Finland has several small think tanks that provide expertise in very specific fields. Notable think tanks include:


* [[Åland Islands Peace Institute]]<ref>{{Cite news |title=Activities |language=en-gb |work=Åland Islands Peace Institute - Ålands fredsinstitut |url=http://www.peace.ax/en/about-us/activities |access-date=22 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130325050946/http://www.peace.ax/en/about-us/activities |archive-date=25 March 2013}}</ref>
==Notes==
* [[Demos Helsinki]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Demos Helsinki |url=https://onthinktanks.org/think-tank/demos-helsinki/ |access-date=4 September 2021 |website=onthinktanks.org |publisher=On Think Tanks |archive-date=4 September 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210904124921/https://onthinktanks.org/think-tank/demos-helsinki/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
<references/>
* [[European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats]] (Hybrid CoE)<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Standish |first=Reid |date=18 January 2018 |title=Inside a European Center to Combat Russia's Hybrid Warfare |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/01/18/inside-a-european-center-to-combat-russias-hybrid-warfare/ |access-date=22 January 2018 |website=Foreign Policy |quote=Located in an unassuming office building filled with boardrooms, lecture halls, and projectors in the Finnish capital, a new entity under the joint auspices of the European Union and NATO was founded with a herculean mission. [...] In this vein, the hybrid center is more of an in-house think tank than a task force dedicated to debunking propaganda or tracking hackers in cyberspace. |archive-date=18 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180118153838/https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/01/18/inside-a-european-center-to-combat-russias-hybrid-warfare/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Crisis Management Initiative]] (CMI)<ref>{{Cite news |date=23 January 2017 |title=Crisis Management Initiative (CMI) |language=en-US |work=Institute for NGO Research |url=https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/crisis-management-initiative-cmi/ |access-date=23 January 2018 |archive-date=24 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180124070753/https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/crisis-management-initiative-cmi/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* [[Research Institute of the Finnish Economy]] (Etla)<ref>{{Cite news |title=Activities in a nutshell: Research, forecasting and policy assessment |language=en-US |work=Etla |url=https://www.etla.fi/en/etla/ |access-date=22 February 2018 |archive-date=22 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180222225454/https://www.etla.fi/en/etla/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Finnish Institute of International Affairs]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Introduction |url=https://www.fiia.fi/en/introduction |access-date=22 February 2018 |website=FIIA – The Finnish Institute of International Affairs |language=en-GB |quote=The Finnish Institute of International Affairs is a research institute whose mission is to produce high quality, topical information on international relations and the EU. |archive-date=22 February 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180222165310/https://www.fiia.fi/en/introduction |url-status=live }}</ref>
In addition to specific independent think tanks, the largest political parties have their own think tank organizations. This is mainly due to support granted by state for such activity. The corporate world has focused their efforts to central representative organization [[Confederation of Finnish Industries]], which acts as think tank in addition to negotiating salaries with workers unions. Furthermore, there is the Finnish Business and Policy Forum (''Elinkeinoelämän valtuuskunta'', EVA). Agricultural and regional interests, associated with The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (''Maa- ja metsätaloustuottajain Keskusliitto'', MTK) and the [[Centre Party (Finland)|Centre Party]], are researched by Pellervo Economic Research (''Pellervon taloustutkimus'', PTT). The [[Central Organisation of Finnish Trade Unions]] (''Suomen Ammattiliittojen Keskusjärjestö'', SAK) and the [[Social Democratic Party of Finland|Social Democratic Party]] are associated with the Labour Institute for Economic Research (''Palkansaajien tutkimuslaitos'', PT). The [[Finns Party]] established its own think tank, ''[[Suomen Perusta]]'', in 2012.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Tamminen |first=Jenni |title=Perussuomalaiset aloitti jättiselvityksen |url=https://www.uusisuomi.fi/uutiset/perussuomalaiset-aloitti-jattiselvityksen/9a50bcce-4224-325d-8150-e6cc96d52a43 |website=Uusi Suomi |date=28 October 2012 |access-date=14 May 2021 |archive-date=14 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210514112950/https://www.uusisuomi.fi/uutiset/perussuomalaiset-aloitti-jattiselvityksen/9a50bcce-4224-325d-8150-e6cc96d52a43 |url-status=live }}</ref> Each of these organizations often release forecasts concerning the national economy.


==See also==
==== France ====
The [[Institut français des relations internationales|French Institute of International Relations]] (IFRI) was founded in 1979 and is the third oldest think tank of western Europe, after Chatham House (UK, 1920) and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sweden, 1960). The primary goals of IFRI are to develop applied research in the field of public policy related to international issues, and foster interactive and constructive dialogue between researchers, professionals, and opinion leaders. France also hosts the [[European Union Institute for Security Studies]] (EUISS), a [[Paris]]-based [[agency of the European Union]] and think tank researching security issues of relevance for the [[European Union|EU]]. There are also a number of pro-business think tanks, notably the Paris-based Fondation Concorde.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Fondation Concorde |url=http://www.fondationconcorde.com/ |access-date=29 July 2016 |publisher=Fondation Concorde |archive-date=29 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160729193630/http://www.fondationconcorde.com/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The foundation focuses on increasing the competitiveness of French SME's and aims to revive entrepreneurship in France.
* [[Abilene paradox]]

* [[Brain Trust]]
On the left, the main think tanks in France are the [[Fondation Jean-Jaurès]], which is organizationally linked to the [[French Socialist Party]], and [[Terra Nova (think tank)|Terra Nova]]. Terra Nova is an independent left-leaning think tank, although it is nevertheless considered to be close to the Socialists. It works on producing reports and analyses of current public policy issues from a progressive point of view, and contributing to the intellectual renewal of social democracy.
* [[Collective behavior]]

* [[Collective consciousness]]
The only French Think Tank mentioned in the "think tanks to watch" list of the 2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report<ref>{{Cite web |last=James G. McGann |title=2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report |url=http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=think_tanks |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Repository.upenn.edu |format=PDF |archive-date=7 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210507081229/https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=think_tanks |url-status=live }}</ref> {{ill|GenerationLibre|fr}} is a French think tank created by Gaspard Koenig in 2013, independent from all political parties, which aims at promoting freedoms in France, in terms of fundamental rights, economics and societal issues. GenerationLibre is described as being able to connect to the right on pro business freedom and regulations issues but also to the left on issues such as basic income, gay marriage and the legalization of marijuana.
* [[Collective Effervescence]]

==== Germany ====
In Germany all of the major parties are loosely associated with research foundations that play some role in shaping policy, but generally from the more disinterested role of providing research to support policymakers than explicitly proposing policy. These include the [[Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung]] ([[Christian Democratic Union (Germany)|Christian Democratic Union]]-aligned), the [[Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung]] ([[Social Democratic Party of Germany|Social Democratic Party]]-aligned), the [[Hanns Seidel Foundation|Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung]] ([[Christian Social Union of Bavaria|Christian Social Union]]-aligned), the {{Lang|de|[[Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung]]|italic=no}} ([[Green Party (Germany)|aligned with the Greens]]), [[Friedrich Naumann Foundation]] ([[Free Democratic Party (Germany)|Free Democratic Party-aligned]]) and the [[Rosa Luxemburg Foundation]] (aligned with [[The Left (Germany)|Die Linke]]).

The [[German Institute for International and Security Affairs]] is a foreign policy think tank. [[Atlantic Community]] is an independent, [[non-partisan]] and [[non-profit]] organization set up as a joint project of Atlantische Initiative e.V. and Atlantic Initiative United States. The [[Institute for Media and Communication Policy]] deals with media-related issues. [[Transparency International]] is a think tank on the role of corporate and political corruption in international development.

==== Greece ====
{{Main|List of Greek think tanks}}
In Greece there are many think tanks, also called research organisations or institutes.

==== Ireland ====
{{See also|Category:Think tanks based in the Republic of Ireland}}
* The [[Economic and Social Research Institute]] (ESRI) is an independent research institute in Dublin, Ireland. Its research focuses on Ireland's economic and social development to inform policy-making and societal understanding.
* The [[Institute of International and European Affairs]] (IIEA) focuses on European and International affairs.
* The [[Iona Institute]] is a conservative, Catholic think tank.
* [[TASC (think tank)|TASC]] (Think tank for Action on Social Change) is an Irish left-wing think tank.
* Transhuman Corporation is a research think tank that focuses on cyber and technology development.

==== Italy ====
* [[Bruno Leoni Institute]]
* [[Future Italy]]
* [[ISPI]] – Italian Institute for International Political Studies
* [[Istituto Affari Internazionali]]
* [[Trinità dei Monti (think tank)|Trinità dei Monti]]

==== Latvia ====
While think tanks are not widespread in Latvia, as opposed to single-issue advocacy organizations, there are several noticeable institutions in the Latvian think tank landscape:
* The oldest think tank in Latvia is [[the Latvian Institute of International Affairs]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Home |url=http://liia.lv/en/about-us/ |access-date=2016-07-29 |website=Liia.lv |archive-date=8 February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130208144438/http://liia.lv/en/about-us/ |url-status=live }}</ref> LIIA is a non governmental and non partisan foundation, established in 1992, and their research and advocacy mainly focuses on Latvian foreign policy; Transatlantic relations; European Union policies, including its neighborhood policy and Eastern Partnership; and multilateral and bilateral relations with Russia.
* Centre for Public policy PROVIDUS<ref>{{Cite web |title=providus.lv |url=http://www.providus.lv/ |access-date=29 July 2016 |publisher=providus.lv |archive-date=24 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160724020018/http://providus.lv/ |url-status=live }}</ref> is a non governmental and non partisan association, established in 2002. Providus focuses their work (both research and advocacy) on topics especially relevant in transition and post-transition environments and Latvia in particular: good governance; criminal justice policy; tolerance and inclusive public policy and European policy.

Several think tanks are established and operate under the auspices of Universities, such as:
* Centre for European and transition studies<ref>{{Cite web |title=Centre for European and Transition Studies – University of Latvia |url=http://www.lu.lv/cets/ |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Lu.lv |archive-date=20 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160820151502/http://www.lu.lv/cets/ |url-status=live }}</ref> is a think tank working under the auspices of the University of Latvia, the largest public university in the country. CETS was established in 2000.
* or Defense research centre<ref>{{Cite web |date=5 November 2013 |title=Latvijas Nacionālā aizsardzības akadēmija |url=http://www.naa.mil.lv/lv/Zinatne/Zinatnu_centra_merkis_un_darbiba.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131105105236/http://www.naa.mil.lv/lv/Zinatne/Zinatnu_centra_merkis_un_darbiba.aspx |archive-date=5 November 2013 |access-date=19 February 2018 }}</ref> in 1992 under the auspices of the National Academy of Defense.

==== Lithuania ====
Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis (VIPA) is an independent non-governmental, non-profit, non-partisan policy think tank in Lithuania whose mission is to stand for the principles of open society, liberal democracy, rule of law and human rights. VIPA acts via advocacy for strong and safe European Union, analyzing and advocating for anti-authoritarian, transparent, and open governance ideas in Central and Eastern Europe, is an opinion leader offering an alternative opinion to the public versus populism, radicalism, and authoritarian trends, reinforcing active citizens' participation in decision making, analyzing fake news, disinformation, and offering media literacy initiatives, putting forward solutions to improve the accountability, transparency, and openness of Lithuania's [[public sector]], building a network of open society values oriented experts, civil activists and NGO's.<ref>{{Cite web |title=vilniusinstitute.lt |url=https://vilniusinstitute.lt/en/apie/ |access-date=14 November 2020 |publisher=vilniusinstitute.lt |archive-date=14 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201114150213/https://vilniusinstitute.lt/en/apie/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

==== Netherlands ====
All major political parties in the Netherlands have state-sponsored research foundations that play a role in shaping policy. The Dutch government also has its own think tank: the [[Scientific Council for Government Policy]]. The Netherlands furthermore hosts the [[Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael]], or Clingendael Institute, an independent think tank and diplomatic academy which studies various aspects of [[international relations]].

==== Poland ====
There is a large pool of think tanks in Poland on a wide variety of subjects. The oldest state-sponsored think tank is [[Western Institute|The Western Institute]] in Poznań (Polish: ''Instytut Zachodni''). The second oldest is the [[Polish Institute of International Affairs]] (PISM) established in 1947. Another notable state-sponsored think tank is the [[Centre for Eastern Studies]] (OSW), which specializes in the countries neighboring Poland and in the Baltic Sea region, the Balkans, Turkey, the Caucasus and Central Asia. Among the private think tanks notable organizations include the [[Institute for Structural Research]] (IBS) on economic policy, [[The Casimir Pulaski Foundation]] on foreign policy, the [[Institute of Public Affairs, Poland|Institute of Public Affairs]] (ISP) on social policy, and the [[Instytut Sobieskiego|Sobieski Institute]].

==== Portugal ====
Founded in 1970, the [[SEDES]] is one of the oldest Portuguese civic associations and think tanks. [[Contraditório think tank]] was founded in 2008. Contraditório is a non-profit, independent and non-partisan think tank.

*

==== Romania ====
The [[Romanian Academic Society]] (SAR), founded in 1996, is a Romanian think tank for policy research.

==== Russia ====

* [[Valdai Discussion Club]]
* [[Izborsky Club]]

==== Serbia ====
The Foundation for the Advancement of Economics (FREN) was founded in 2005 by the [[University of Belgrade|Belgrade University]]'s [[University of Belgrade Faculty of Economics|Faculty of Economics]].

==== Slovakia ====
Think tanks originating in Slovakia:

* [[GLOBSEC]] – Global think tank committed to enhancing security, prosperity and sustainability in Europe and throughout the world.
* [[Central European Labour Studies Institute]] or ''CELSI'' (''Stredoeurópsky inštitút pre výskum práce'' in [[Slovak language|Slovak]]) – Central-european think tank which specializes in broadly defined labor issues, labour markets, and labor policy.
* [[Forum Minority Research Institute]] (''Fórum Kisebbségkutató Intézet'' or ''Fórum Intézet'' in [[Hungarian language|Hungarian]] and ''Fórum inštitút pre výskum menšín'' or ''Fórum inštitút'' in [[Slovak language|Slovak]]) – Think tank focusing on ethnic minorities living in Slovakia, especially Hungarians.

International think tanks with presence in Slovakia:
* [[Institute of Public Affairs]] (''Inštitút pre verejné otázky'' or ''IVO'' in [[Slovak language|Slovak]]) – Australian-based think tank focusing on public policy issues.
* [[Open Society Foundations]] or ''OSF'' – US-based think tank with an aim of advancing justice, education, public health and independent media.
* [[Martens Centre]] (via the Anton Tunega Foundation<ref>{{Cite web |title=O nadácií – Nadácia Antona Tunegu |url=https://www.tunega.sk/o-nadacii/ |access-date=2022-11-01 |language=sk-SK |archive-date=1 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221101173505/https://www.tunega.sk/o-nadacii/ |url-status=live }}</ref>) – Belgium-based think tank and political foundation of the European People's Party (EPP) which embodies a pan-European mindset and promotes Christian-democratic and liberal-conservative political values.

==== Spain ====
The [[Elcano Royal Institute]] was created in 2001 following the example of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) in the UK, although it is closely linked to (and receives funding from) the government in power.<ref>{{Cite web |title=About Chatham House |url=https://www.chathamhouse.org/about |access-date=26 May 2020 |website=Chatham House |language=en |archive-date=8 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200508143330/https://www.chathamhouse.org/about |url-status=live }}</ref>

More independent but clearly to the left of the political spectrum are the Centro de Investigaciones de Relaciones Internacionales y Desarrollo (CIDOB) founded in 1973; and the Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE) established in 1999 by Diego Hidalgo and main driving force behind projects such as the Club de Madrid, a group of democratic former heads of state and government, the Foreign Policy Spanish Edition and [[DARA (international organization)|DARA]].{{Citation needed|date=June 2019}}

Former Prime Minister [[José Maria Aznar]] presides over the Fundación para el Analisis y los Estudios Sociales ([[FAES]]), a policy institute that is associated with the conservative Popular Party (PP). Also linked to the PP is the Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos (GEES), which is known for its defense- and security-related research and analysis. For its part, the [[Fundación Alternativas]] is independent but close to left-wing ideas. The Socialist [[Partido Socialista Obrero Español]] (PSOE) created Fundación Ideas in 2009 and dissolved it in January 2014. Also in 2009, the centrist [[Union, Progress and Democracy]] (UPyD) created Fundación Progreso y Democracia (FPyD).

==== Sweden ====
[[Timbro]] is a [[free market]] think tank and book publisher based in [[Stockholm]].

==== Switzerland ====
Think tanks based within Switzerland include:
*[[Avenir Suisse]], founded in 1999 by fifteen of the largest Swiss companies. It is supported by over 130 companies to date.<ref>{{Cite web |title=avenir suisse &#124; think tank for economic and social issues |url=http://www.avenir-suisse.ch/en/ |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Avenir-suisse.ch |archive-date=22 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160722180239/http://www.avenir-suisse.ch/en/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
*[[DCAF]], the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, founded in 2000 to research [[security sector governance and reform]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=McGann |first=James |year=2017 |title=2016 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report |url=http://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/12 |journal=TTCSP Global Go to Think Tank Index Reports |series=TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 12. |issue=12 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania |access-date=22 February 2018 |archive-date=6 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170606205428/http://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/12/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
*[[Gottlieb Duttweiler Institute]] (GDI), conceived by the [[Migros]]-founder [[Gottlieb Duttweiler]] in 1946.<ref>{{Cite web |title=GDI – Geschichte |url=http://www.gdi.ch/de/ueber-uns/geschichte |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Gdi.ch |archive-date=28 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160828235100/http://www.gdi.ch/de/ueber-uns/geschichte |url-status=live }}</ref>
*[[Horasis]], which hosts the annual [[Horasis Global Meeting]]
*[[Liberales Institut|Liberal Institute]], founded in 1979.<ref>{{Cite web |title=twitter |url=http://www.libinst.ch/?i=home--en |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Libinst.ch |archive-date=18 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160818190444/http://www.libinst.ch/?i=home--en |url-status=live }}</ref>

==== Ukraine ====
There are more than 100 registered think tanks in [[Ukraine]]{{Citation needed|date=November 2023}}, including:

* [[Centre of Policy and Legal Reform]] (CPLR), a non-governmental think tank founded in 1996.
* [[Center for Policy Studies in Ukraine]], a non-governmental think tank founded in 1994.
* [[Razumkov Centre]], a non-governmental think tank founded in 1994. It carries out research of public policy in the following spheres: domestic policy; state administration; economic policy; energy; land relations; foreign policy; social policy; international and regional security; national security and defense.
* [[Transatlantic Dialogue Center]], a non-governmental think tank founded in 2021.

==== United Kingdom ====
{{See also|List of think tanks in the United Kingdom}}
In Britain, think tanks play a similar role to the United States, attempting to shape policy, and indeed there is some cooperation between British and American think tanks. For example, the London-based think tank [[Chatham House]] and the [[Council on Foreign Relations]] were both conceived at the [[Paris Peace Conference, 1919]] and have remained sister organisations.

The [[Bow Group]], founded in 1951, is the oldest centre-right think tank and many of its members have gone on to serve as Members of Parliament or Members of the European Parliament. Past chairmen have included [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]] leader [[Michael Howard]], [[Margaret Thatcher]]'s longest-serving Cabinet Minister [[Geoffrey Howe]], [[Chancellor of the Exchequer]] [[Norman Lamont, Baron Lamont of Lerwick|Norman Lamont]] and former [[British Telecom]] chairman [[Christopher Bland]].

Since 2000, a number of influential centre-right think tanks have emerged including [[Policy Exchange]], [[Centre for Social Justice]] and most recently [[Onward (think tank)|Onward]].<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Eaton |first=George |author-link=George Eaton (journalist) |date=18 May 2018 |title=Onward – the Tory think tank on a mission to remake conservatism |url=https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2018/05/onward-tory-think-tank-mission-remake-conservatism |magazine=[[New Statesman]] |access-date=19 March 2022}}</ref>

===Oceanian think tanks===
==== Australia ====
Most Australian think tanks are based at universities – for example, the [[The Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research|Melbourne Institute]] – or are government-funded – for example, the [[Productivity Commission]] or the [[CSIRO]].

Private sources fund about 20 to 30 "independent" Australian think tanks.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Who are Australia's major think tanks? |url=https://www.govconnex.com/resources/who-are-australias-major-think-tanks |access-date=2023-11-23 |website=www.govconnex.com}}</ref> The best-known of these think tanks play a much more limited role in Australian public and business policy-making than do their equivalents in the United States. However, in the past decade{{which|date=May 2015}} the number of think tanks has increased substantially.{{Citation needed|date=February 2010}} Prominent Australian conservative think tanks include [[the Centre for Independent Studies]], the [[Sydney Institute]] and the [[Institute of Public Affairs]]. Prominent leftist Australian think tanks include [[the McKell Institute]], Per Capita, the Australia Institute, the [[Lowy Institute for International Policy|Lowy Institute]] and the Centre for Policy Development. In recent years{{when|date=May 2015}} regionally-based independent and non-partisan think tanks have emerged.{{citation needed|date=May 2015}}

Some think tanks, such as the [[Illawarra]]'s i-eat-drink-think, engage in discussion, research and advocacy within a broader civics framework. Commercial think tanks like the Gartner Group, Access Economics, the Helmsman Institute, and others provide additional insight which complements not-for-profit organisations such as [[Committee for Economic Development of Australia|CEDA]], the [[Australian Strategic Policy Institute]], and the [[Australian Institute of Company Directors]] to provide more targeted policy in defence, program governance, corporate governance and similar.{{cn|date=October 2022}}

Think tanks in Australia include:
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
* [[Air Power Australia]]
* [[Asia Education Foundation]]
* [[Asialink]]
* [[The Australia Institute]]
* [[Australian Fabian Society]]
* [[Australian Institute of International Affairs]]
* [[Australian Institute of Policy & Science]]
* [[Australian Strategic Policy Institute]]
* [[The Brisbane Institute]]
* [[Centre for Independent Studies]]
* [[Centre for Policy Development]]
* [[Chifley Research Centre]]
* [[Committee for Economic Development of Australia]]
* [[Consumer Policy Research Centre (CPRC)]]
* [[Crowther Centre for Learning and Innovation]]
* [[Development Policy Centre]]
* [[Doctors Reform Society of Australia]]
* [[Evatt Foundation]]
* [[Grattan Institute]]
* [[H. R. Nicholls Society]]
* [[Infrastructure Partnerships Australia]]
* [[Institute for Economics and Peace]]
* [[Institute of Public Affairs]]
* [[International Energy Centre]]
* [[International WaterCentre]]
* [[Issues Deliberation Australia/America]]
* [[Laboratory for Visionary Architecture]]
* [[Lowy Institute for International Policy]]
* [[The Green Institute]]
* [[The McKell Institute]]
* [[The Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research]]
* [[Menzies Research Centre]]
* [[National Civic Council]]
* [[New South Wales Institute for Educational Research]]
* Per Capita
* [[Samuel Griffith Society]]
* [[Strategic and Defence Studies Centre]]
* [[Sydney Institute]]
* [[Transport and Logistics Centre]]
* [[United States Studies Centre]]
* [[Western Australia Policy Forum]]
{{div col end}}

====New Zealand====
Think tanks based in New Zealand include:
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
* [[Centre for Strategic Studies New Zealand]]
* [[Child Poverty Action Group (Aotearoa New Zealand)]]
* [[Helen Clark Foundation]]
* [[Maxim Institute]]
* [[McGuinness Institute]]
* [[Motu Economic and Public Policy Research]]
* [[New Zealand Centre for Global Studies ]]
* [[New Zealand Initiative]]
* [[New Zealand Institute of Economic Research]]
{{div col end}}

=== North American think tanks ===
==== Canada ====
Canada has many notable think tanks (listed in alphabetical order). Each has specific areas of interest with some overlaps.

{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
* [[Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada]]
* [[Atlantic Institute for Market Studies]]<ref>{{Cite web |date=7 August 2010 |title=AIMS - Atlantic Institute for Market Studies |url=http://www.aims.ca/en/home/default.aspx |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100807032053/http://www.aims.ca/en/home/default.aspx |archive-date=7 August 2010 |access-date=19 February 2018 }}</ref>
* [[Broadbent Institute]]
* [[C. D. Howe Institute|C.D. Howe Institute]]
* [[Caledon Institute of Social Policy]]
* [[Canada West Foundation]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Canada West Foundation &#124; |url=http://cwf.ca/ |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Cwf.ca |archive-date=21 October 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111021234545/http://cwf.ca/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives]]
* [[Canadian Global Affairs Institute]]
* [[Canadian Institute for Advanced Research]]
* [[Canadian International Council]]
* [[Canadian Policy Research Networks]] (disbanded)
* [[Canadian Tax Foundation]]
* [[Cardus]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Cardus |url=http://www.cardus.ca/ |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Cardus.ca |archive-date=10 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190810165314/https://www.cardus.ca/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Centre for International Governance Innovation]]
* [[Conference Board of Canada]]
* [[Council of Canadians]]
* [[Fraser Institute]]
* [[Frontier Centre for Public Policy]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Frontier Centre For Public Policy |url=https://fcpp.org/ |website=Frontier Centre For Public Policy |access-date=11 May 2022 |archive-date=12 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512085811/https://fcpp.org/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Institute for Quantum Computing]]
* [[Institute for Research on Public Policy]]
* [[Institute on Governance]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Institute on Governance – Leading Expertise |url=http://www.iog.ca/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140911061152/http://iog.ca/ |archive-date=11 September 2014 |access-date=18 August 2014 |website=Institute on Governance}}</ref>
* [[International Institute for Sustainable Development]]
* [[International Policy Forum]]
* [[Macdonald–Laurier Institute]]
* [[Montreal Economic Institute]]
* [[Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation]]
* [[National Citizens Coalition]]
* [[North-South Institute]]
* [[Parkland Institute]]<ref>{{Cite web |title=Parkland Institute :: Research and Education for the Common Good :: Edmonton, Alberta |url=http://parklandinstitute.ca/ |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Parklandinstitute.ca |archive-date=28 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160728041903/http://www.parklandinstitute.ca/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
* [[Pembina Institute]]
* [[Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics]]
* [[Public Policy Forum]]{{div col end}}

==== Mexico ====
*[[CIDAC]] – The Center of Research for Development (Centro de Investigación para el Desarrollo, Asociación Civil) is a not-for-profit think tank that undertakes research and proposes viable policy options for Mexico's economic and democratic development. The organization seeks to promote open, pluralistic debate pursuing: the Rule of Law & Democracy, market economics, social development, and strengthening Mexico-United States relations.
*[[Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas|CIDE]] – The Center of Research and Economics Teaching (Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas) is a think tank institute focussing on "public policies", "public choice", "democracy", and "economy".
*COMEXI – The Mexican Council of International Affairs (Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales).

==== United States ====
{{See also|List of think tanks in the United States}}
As the classification is most often used today, the oldest American think tank is the [[Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]], founded in 1910.<ref name="Thomas Medvetz 2012">Thomas Medvetz, "'Think Tanks in America" (2012) Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press</ref> The Institute for Government Research, which later merged with two organizations to form the [[Brookings Institution]], was formed in 1916. Other early twentieth century organizations now classified as think tanks include the [[Hoover Institution]] (1919), [[Twentieth Century Fund|The Twentieth Century Fund]] (1919, and now known as the Century Foundation), the [[National Bureau of Economic Research]] (1920), the [[Council on Foreign Relations]] (1921), and the [[Social Science Research Council]] (1923). The Great Depression and its aftermath spawned several economic policy organizations, such as the National Planning Association (1934), the [[Tax Foundation]] (1937),<ref>{{Cite web |title=About Us |url=https://taxfoundation.org/about-us |access-date=14 April 2015 |publisher=Tax Foundation |archive-date=14 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150414200118/http://taxfoundation.org/about-us |url-status=live }}</ref> and the [[Committee for Economic Development]] (1943).<ref name="Thomas Medvetz 2012" />

In collaboration with the Douglas Aircraft Company, the Air Force set up the [[RAND Corporation]] in 1946 to develop weapons technology and strategic defense analysis.

The [[Hudson Institute]] is a conservative American think tank founded in 1961 by futurist, military strategist, and systems theorist Herman Kahn and his colleagues at the RAND Corporation. Recent members include Mike Pompeo, the former secretary of state under Donald Trump who joined in 2021.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Scoop: Pompeo to stay in DC and join Hudson Institute - Axios |url=https://www.axios.com/pompeo-hudson-institute-28ad3b8f-1c52-40f8-b5ce-e734cb38e842.html |access-date=8 November 2021 |archive-date=8 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211108231820/https://www.axios.com/pompeo-hudson-institute-28ad3b8f-1c52-40f8-b5ce-e734cb38e842.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

More recently, progressive and liberal think tanks have been established, most notably the [[Center for American Progress]] and the Center for Research on Educational Access and Leadership (CREAL). The organization has close ties to former United States President [[Barack Obama]] and other prominent Democrats.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Wallstein |first=Peter |date=19 January 2012 |title=Center for American Progress, group tied to Obama, under fire from Israel advocates |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/center-for-america-progress-group-tied-to-obama-accused-of-anti-semitic-language/2012/01/17/gIQAcrHXAQ_story.html |access-date=26 February 2014 |archive-date=21 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131221112614/http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/center-for-america-progress-group-tied-to-obama-accused-of-anti-semitic-language/2012/01/17/gIQAcrHXAQ_story.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

Think tanks help shape both foreign and domestic policy. They receive funding from private donors, and members of private organizations. By 2013, the largest 21 think tanks in the US spent more than [[US$]]1&nbsp;billion per year.<ref name="Funding">{{Cite journal |last=Cohen |first=Rick |date=12 December 2014 |title=The Inner Workings of Think Tanks: Transparify Gives Us a Good Look |url=https://nonprofitquarterly.org/policysocial-context/25317-the-inner-workings-of-think-tanks-transparify-gives-us-a-good-look.html |journal=Nonprofit Quarterly |access-date=21 December 2014 |archive-date=16 December 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141216074737/https://nonprofitquarterly.org/policysocial-context/25317-the-inner-workings-of-think-tanks-transparify-gives-us-a-good-look.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Think tanks may feel more free to propose and debate controversial ideas than people within government. The progressive media watchdog Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) has identified the top 25 think tanks by media citations, noting that from 2006 to 2007 the number of citations declined 17%.<ref>{{Cite web |date=1 March 2008 |title=The Incredible Shrinking Think Tank |url=https://fair.org/extra/the-incredible-shrinking-think-tank/ |access-date=30 December 2020 |website=FAIR |language=en-US |archive-date=18 April 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180418031708/https://fair.org/extra/the-incredible-shrinking-think-tank/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The FAIR report reveals the ideological breakdown of the citations: 37% conservative, 47% centrist, and 16% liberal. Their data show that the most-cited think tank was the [[Brookings Institution]], followed by the [[Council on Foreign Relations]], the [[American Enterprise Institute]], [[The Heritage Foundation]], and the [[Center for Strategic and International Studies]].

{{Outdated|date=May 2023}}

In 2016, in response to scrutiny about think tanks appearing to have a "conflict of interest" or lack transparency, executive vice president, Martin S. Indyk of Brookings Institution – the "most prestigious think tank in the world"<ref name="NYT_2016_Lipton">{{Cite news |last1=Lipton |first1=Eric |last2=Williams |first2=Brooke |date=7 August 2016 |title=Researchers or Corporate Allies? Think Tanks Blur the Line |work=[[New York Times]] |url=http://nyti.ms/2bbXNNk |access-date=9 August 2016}}</ref> admitted that they had "decided to prohibit corporations or corporate-backed foundations from making anonymous contributions." In August 2016, ''[[The New York Times]]'' published a series on think tanks that blur the line. One of the cases the journalists cited was Brookings, where scholars paid by a seemingly independent think tank "push donors' agendas amplifying a culture of corporate influence in Washington." For example, in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars the Brookings Institution provided [[Lennar]] – one of the United States' largest home builders – with a significant advantage in pursuing a US$8&nbsp;billion revitalization project in Hunters Point, San Francisco. In 2014, Lennar's then-regional vice president in charge of the San Francisco revitalization, Kofi Bonner was named as a Brookings senior fellow – a position as 'trusted adviser' that carries some distinction. Bruce Katz, a Brookings vice president, also offered to help Lennar "engage with national media to develop stories that highlight Lennar's innovative approach."<ref name="NYT_2016_Lipton" />

===== U.S. government think tanks =====
Government think tanks are also important in the United States, particularly in the security and defense field. These include the Center for Technology and National Security Policy at the [[National Defense University]], the Center for Naval Warfare Studies at the [[Naval War College]], and the [[Strategic Studies Institute]] at the [[U.S. Army War College]].

The government funds, wholly or in part, activities at approximately 30 [[Federally Funded Research and Development Centers]] (FFRDCs). FFRDCs, are unique independent nonprofit entities sponsored and funded by the United States government to meet specific long-term technical needs that cannot be met by any other single organization. FFRDCs typically assist government agencies with scientific research and analysis, systems development, and systems acquisition. They bring together the expertise and outlook of government, industry, and academia to solve complex technical problems. These FFRDCs include the [[RAND Corporation]], the [[MITRE Corporation]], the [[Institute for Defense Analyses]], the [[Aerospace Corporation]], the [[MIT Lincoln Laboratory]], and other organizations supporting various departments within the United States Government.

Similar to the above quasi-governmental organizations are [[Federal Advisory Committee Act|Federal Advisory Committees]]. These groups, sometimes referred to as commissions, are a form of think tank dedicated to advising the US Presidents or the Executive branch of government. They typically focus on a specific issue and as such, might be considered similar to special interest groups. However, unlike special interest groups these committees have come under some oversight regulation and are required to make formal records available to the public. As of 2002, about 1,000 of these advisory committees were described in the FACA searchable database.<ref>{{Cite web |date=18 November 2002 |title=Search Page |url=http://fido.gov/facadatabase/search.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20021118003800/http://fido.gov/facadatabase/search.asp |archive-date=18 November 2002 |access-date=19 February 2018 }}</ref>

=== South American think tanks ===
Research done by Enrique Mendizabal<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mendizabal Enrique |date=2009 |title=Think tanks and political parties in Latin America, Background Paper |url=http://www.odi.org.uk/events/2009/03/10/443-think-tanks-political-parties.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101008151911/http://www.odi.org.uk/events/2009/03/10/443-think-tanks-political-parties.pdf |archive-date=8 October 2010 |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Odi.org.uk}}</ref> shows that South American think tanks play various roles depending on their origins, historical development and relations to other policy actors. In this study, Orazio Bellettini from [[Grupo FARO]] suggests that they:<ref>Mendizabal, Enrique y Kristen Sample (eds) (2009) Dime a quien escuchas... Think Tanks y Partidos Politicos en America Latina, ODI/IDEA: Lima</ref>

* Seek political support for policies.
* Legitimize policies – This has been clearer in [[Ecuador]], [[Bolivia]] and [[Peru]]. New governments in Ecuador and Peru have approached policy institutes for support for already defined policies. In Bolivia, the government of [[Evo Morales]] has been working with Non-Government Organizations ([[NGO]]s) and other research institutes to do the same. However, in Chile, many think tanks during the 1990s seemed to endorse and maintain the legitimacy of policies implemented during the previous decade by [[Military government of Chile (1973–1990)|the military dictatorship]] headed by Pinochet.
* Spaces of debate – In this case think tanks serve as sounding boards for new policies. In [[Chile]], during the Pinochet dictatorship, many left wing intellectuals and researchers found 'asylum' in think tanks. In Ecuador, think tanks are seen as spaces where politicians can test the soundness of their policies and government plans.
* Financial channels for political parties or other interest groups – In Ecuador and Bolivia, German foundations have been able to provide funds to think tanks that work with certain political parties. This method has provided support to the system as a whole rather than individual CSOs.
* Expert cadres of policy-makers and politicians – In Peru after the end of the [[Alberto Fujimori|Fujimori]] regime, and in Chile after the fall of Pinochet, think tank staff left to form part of the new governments. In the United States, the role of major think tanks is precisely that: host scholars for a few months or years and then lose them to government employ.

How a policy institute addresses these largely depends on how they work, their ideology vs. evidence credentials, and the context in which they operate including funding opportunities, the degree and type of competition they have and their staff.

This functional method addresses the inherit challenge of defining a think tank. As Simon James said in 1998, "Discussion of think tanks...has a tendency to get bogged down in the vexed question of defining what we mean by 'think tank'—an exercise that often degenerates into futile semantics."<ref>{{Cite web |title="Think Tanks as an Emergent Field" — Publication — Social Science Research Council |url=http://www.ssrc.org/publications/view/A2A2BA10-B135-DE11-AFAC-001CC477EC70/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100625234954/http://www.ssrc.org/publications/view/A2A2BA10-B135-DE11-AFAC-001CC477EC70/ |archive-date=25 June 2010 |access-date=2 November 2011 |publisher=Ssrc.org}}</ref> It is better (as in the Network Functions Approach) to describe what the organisation should do. Then the shape of the organisation should follow to allow this to happen. The following framework (based on Stephen Yeo's description of think tanks' mode of work) is described in Enrique Mendizabal's blog "onthinktanks":

First, policy institutes may work in or base their funding on one or more of:<ref>{{Cite web |title=on the business model and how this affects what think tanks do « on think tanks |url=http://onthinktanks.wordpress.com/2010/10/03/on-the-business-model/ |access-date=2 November 2011 |publisher=Onthinktanks.wordpress.com |archive-date=7 November 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101107162803/http://onthinktanks.wordpress.com/2010/10/03/on-the-business-model/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

* Independent research: this would be work done with core or flexible funding that allows the researchers the liberty to choose their research questions and method. It may be long term and could emphasize 'big ideas' without direct policy relevance. However, it could emphasize a major policy problem that requires a thorough research and action investment.
* Consultancy: this would be work done by commission with specific clients and addressing one or two major questions. Consultancies often respond to an existing agenda.
* Influencing/advocacy: this would be work done by communications, capacity development, networking, campaigns, lobbying, etc. It is likely to be based on research based evidence emerging from independent research or consultancies.

Second, policy institutes may base their work or arguments on:

* Ideology, values or interests
* Applied, empirical or synthesis research
* Theoretical or academic research

According to the [[National Institute for Research Advancement]], a Japanese policy institute, think tanks are "one of the main policy actors in democratic societies ..., assuring a pluralistic, open and accountable process of policy analysis, research, decision-making and evaluation".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2 May 2006 |title=NIRA's World Directory of Think Tanks 2002: Introduction |url=http://www.nira.go.jp/ice/nwdtt/2005/intro/intro2002.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060502051923/http://www.nira.go.jp/ice/nwdtt/2005/intro/intro2002.html |archive-date=2 May 2006 |access-date=19 February 2018 }}</ref> A study in early 2009 found a total of 5,465 think tanks worldwide. Of that number, 1,777 were based in the United States and approximately 350 in Washington, DC, alone.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Foreign Policy, January/February, 2009 |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4598&page=0 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100107041251/http://foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4598&page=0 |archive-date=7 January 2010 |access-date=2 November 2011 |publisher=Foreignpolicy.com }}</ref>

==== Argentina ====
As of 2009, [[Science and technology in Argentina|Argentina]] is home to 122 think tanks, many specializing in [[public policy]] and [[economics]] issues. Argentina ranks fifth in the number of these institutions worldwide.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 January 2009 |title=Argentina, quinto país en el mundo en centros de estudio |url=http://www.clarin.com/diario/2009/01/25/sociedad/s-01846328.htm |access-date=29 July 2016 |website=Clarin.com |archive-date=31 March 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120331154406/https://edant.clarin.com/diario/2009/01/25/sociedad/s-01846328.htm |url-status=bot: unknown }}</ref>

==== Brazil ====
Working on public policies, Brazil hosts, for example, [[Instituto Liberdade]], a University-based Center at Tecnopuc inside the [[Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul]], located in the South Region of the country, in the city of [[Porto Alegre]]. Instituto Liberdade is among the Top 40 think tanks in Latin America and the Caribbean, according to the 2009 Global Go To Think Tanks Index<ref name="Go-To Think Tanks 2009">{{Cite web |last=McGann |first=James |title=The Global "Go-To Think Tanks" |url=http://www.fpri.org/research/thinktanks/GlobalGoToThinkTanks2009.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111019080932/http://www.fpri.org/research/thinktanks/GlobalGoToThinkTanks2009.pdf |archive-date=19 October 2011 |publisher=the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program }}</ref> a report from the University of Pennsylvania's Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP).

[[Fundação Getulio Vargas]] (Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV)) is a Brazilian higher education institution. Its original goal was to train people for the country's public- and private-sector management. Today it hosts faculties (Law, Business, Economics, Social Sciences and Mathematics), libraries, and also research centers in Rio, São Paulo and Brasilia. It is considered by ''[[Foreign Policy]]'' magazine to be a top-five "policymaker think tank" worldwide.

The [[Igarapé Institute]] is a Brazilian think tank focusing on public, climate, and digital security.<ref>{{Cite web |title=About Igarapé |url=https://igarape.org.br/en/about-igarape/ |access-date=25 January 2022 |website=Igarapé Institute |archive-date=25 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220125194115/https://igarape.org.br/en/about-igarape/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

=== Transcontinental countries (Asia-Europe) ===
==== Armenia ====
According to a 2020 report, there are 32 think tanks or similar institutions in Armenia.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=McGann |first=James G |year=2020 |title=2020 Global Go To Think Tanks Index Report |url=https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=think_tanks |journal=University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons |access-date=28 September 2022 |archive-date=22 May 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210522000141/https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=think_tanks |url-status=live }}</ref>

The government closed the [[Noravank Foundation]], a government-affiliated think tank, in 2018 after almost two decades of operation. However, other think tanks continue to operate, include the [[Caucasus Institute]], the [[Caucasus Research Resource Centers|Caucasus Research Resource Center-Armenia]] (CRRC-Armenia) (which publishes the "Caucasus Barometer" annual public opinion survey of the [[South Caucasus]], the "Enlight" Public Research Center, and the AMBERD research center at the [[Armenian State University of Economics]].<ref>Vardan Atoyan, [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362188209_Armenian_Think_Tanks_are_Facing_Old_and_New_Challenges Armenian Think Tanks Are Facing Old and New Challenges] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221203101954/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362188209_Armenian_Think_Tanks_are_Facing_Old_and_New_Challenges |date=3 December 2022 }}, ''SSRN Electronic Journal'' (July 2022).</ref>

==== Azerbaijan ====
According to research done by the University of Pennsylvania, there are a total of 12 think tanks in Azerbaijan.

[[The Center for Economic and Social Development]], or CESD; in Azeri, Azerbaijan, İqtisadi və Sosial İnkişaf Mərkəzi (İSİM) is an [[Azerbaijanis|Azeri]] think tank, [[non-profit organization]], [[NGO]] based in [[Baku]], Azerbaijan. The center was established in 2005. CESD focuses on policy advocacy and reform, and is involved with policy research and capacity building.

The [[Economic Research Center]] (ERC) is a policy-research oriented non-profit think tank established in 1999 with a mission to facilitate sustainable economic development and good governance in the new public management system of Azerbaijan. It seeks to do this by building favorable interactions between the public, private and civil society and working with different networks both in local (EITI NGO Coalition, National Budget Group, Public Coalition Against Poverty, etc.) and international levels (PWYP, IBP, ENTO, ALDA, PASOS, WTO NGO Network etc.).{{Citation needed|reason=While this is all very likely true, I cannot find references other than the website.|date=August 2011}}

The Center for Strategic Studies under the President of Azerbaijan is a governmental, non-profit think tank founded in 2007. It focusses on domestic and foreign policy.

==== Russia ====
According to the [[Foreign Policy Research Institute]], Russia has 112 think tanks, while Russian think tanks claimed four of the top ten spots in 2011's "Top Thirty Think Tanks in Central and Eastern Europe".<ref name="fpri2011">{{Cite report |title=The Global Go To Think Tanks Report 2011 |date=18 January 2012 |url=http://www.fpri.org/research/thinktanks/GlobalGoToThinkTanks2011.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120324070825/http://www.fpri.org/research/thinktanks/GlobalGoToThinkTanks2011.pdf |archive-date=24 March 2012 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania |access-date=19 February 2018 |via=Foreign Policy Research Institute}}</ref>

Notable Russian think tanks include:
* [[Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation]]
* [[Carnegie Moscow Center]]
*[[Institute for US and Canadian Studies]]
*[[Institute of World Economy and International Relations]]
*[[Moscow State Institute of International Relations]]

==== Turkey ====
[[Turkish think tanks]] are relatively new.{{Citation needed|date=December 2019|reason=also when?}} There are at least 20 think tanks in the country, both independent and supported by government. Many of them are sister organizations of political parties, universities or companies some are independent and others are supported by government. Most Turkish think tanks provide research and ideas, yet they play less important roles in policy making than American think tanks. Turksam, Tasam and the ''[[Journal of Turkish Weekly]]'' are the leading information sources.

The oldest and most influential think tank in Turkey is ESAM (The Center for Economic and Social Research; {{lang-tr|Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Merkezi}}) which was established in 1969 and has headquarters in Ankara. There are also branch offices of ESAM in Istanbul, Bursa, Konya and elsewhere. ESAM has strong international relationships, especially with Muslim countries and societies. Ideologically it performs policies, produces ideas and manages projects in parallel to [[Milli Görüş]] and also influences political parties and international strategies. The founder and leader of Milli Görüş, [[Necmettin Erbakan]], was very concerned with the activities and brainstorming events of ESAM. In The Republic of Turkey, two presidents, four prime ministers, various ministers, many members of the parliament, and numerous mayors and bureaucrats have been members of ESAM. Currently the General Chairman of ESAM is [[Recai Kutan]] (former minister for two different ministries, former main opposition party leader, and founder and General Chairman of the [[Saadet Party]]).{{Citation needed|date=January 2019}}

The [[Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation]] (TESEV) is another leading think tank. Established in 1994, TESEV is an independent non-governmental think tank, analyzing social, political and economic policy issues facing Turkey. TESEV has raised issues about Islam and democracy, combating corruption, state reform, and transparency and accountability. TESEV serve as a bridge between academic research and policy-making. Its core program areas are democratization, good governance, and foreign policy.<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 April 2001 |title=TESEV Türkiye Ekonomik ve Sosyal Etüdler Vakfı |url=http://www.tesev.org.tr/eng/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010425173927/http://www.tesev.org.tr/eng/ |archive-date=25 April 2001 |access-date=19 February 2018 }}</ref>

Other notable Turkish think tanks are the [[International Strategic Research Organisation]] (USAK), the [[Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research]] (SETA), and the [[Turkish think tanks#BİLGESAM|Wise Men Center for Strategic Studies]] (BİLGESAM).

== Public opinion ==
A poll by the British firm Cast From Clay found that only 20 percent of Americans trusted think tanks in 2021.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Rojansky |first1=Matthew |last2=Shapiro |first2=Jeremy |date=28 May 2021 |title=Why Everyone Hates Think Tanks |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/05/28/why-everyone-hates-think-tanks/ |access-date=28 September 2022 |website=Foreign Policy |language=en-US |archive-date=28 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220928015657/https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/05/28/why-everyone-hates-think-tanks/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

== See also ==
* [[Collective intelligence]]
* [[Collective intelligence]]
* [[Futurists]]
* [[Futurists]]
* [[Group behaviour]]
* [[Internet think tanks]]
* [[Group polarization]]
* [[Group-serving bias]]
* [[Groupthink]]
* [[List of think tanks]]
* [[List of think tanks]]
* [[List of think tanks in the United Kingdom]]
* [[List of think tanks in the United States]]
* [[Peer pressure]]
* [[Lobbying]]
* [[Policy institute]]
* [[Mass collaboration]]
* [[Mass communication]]

* [[Overton window]]
==Additional reading==
* [[School of thought]]
*Goodman, John C. "What is a Think Tank?" National Center for Policy Analysis, 2005.[http://www.ncpa.org/pub/special/20051220-sp.html]
* [[Strategic studies]]
*Abelson, Donald E. ''Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes.'' Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002.
* [[TED (conference)]]
*Callahan, David. "The Think Tank As Flack, How Microsoft and other corporations use conservative policy groups", ''Washington Monthly'' (November 1999).[http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/1999/9911.callahan.think.html]
*Richard Cockett, ''Thinking the unthinkable : think tanks and the economic counter revolution ; 1931 - 1983'', London : Fontana, 1995
*Fan, Maureen. "Capital Brain Trust Puts Stamp on the World", ''Washington Post'' ([[16 May]] [[2005]]): B01.[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/15/AR2005051501035.html]
*[[Patrick Dixon]]. ''[[Futurewise]] - Six Faces of Global Change'' - issues covered by Think Tanks and methodology for reviewing trends, impact on policy [[2003]]): Profile Books
*[[George Lakoff|Lakoff, George]]. ''[[Moral Politics]]: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't.'' Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
*Kinau, Jacques. "Start Your Own Tax Exempt Think Tank: Effective Self-Defense Against Corporate and Political Donor Class Tax Predation" [http://www.inre.org]
*Morgan, Dan. "Think Tanks: Corporations' Quiet Weapon", ''Washington Post'' ([[29 January]] [[2001]]): A1.[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A46598-2000Jan28]
*Stone, Diane, and Andrew Denham, eds. ''Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas.'' Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004.


==External links==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
*[http://marketplace.publicradio.org/features/under_the_influence/ ''The Economist'' Magazine and NPR's Marketplace report: "Under the Influence: Think Tanks and The Money That Fuels Them"]
*[http://www.sourcewatch.org/wiki.phtml?title=Think_tanks SourceWatch's definition of Think Tank]
*[http://www.nira.go.jp/ice/nwdtt/index.html#1 NIRA's World Directory of Think Tanks]
*[http://www.thinktankdirectory.org/ Think Tank Directory: Directory of German think tanks (in German) and Think Tank Directory Europe with a list of European institutes with a specialisation in EU issues (in English)]
*[http://www.worldpress.org/library/ngo.cfm ''World Press Review'' Directory of Think-Tanks and NGOs]
*[http://www.ltlf.co.uk/ iGoBeyond] - An innovation community network of connected creative minds
*[http://www.pbs.org/thinktank/transcript1209.html PBS' ''Think Tank with Ben Wattenberg'': "Thinking About Think Tanks"] - interview with Christopher DeMuth, President of AEI, October 13, 2005
*[http://www.thinktankdirectory.com/ Think Tank Directory], Profiles of Over 1,100 Think Tanks In Washington, D.C. and the 50 States
*{{fr}} [http://www.oftt.eu/ French Observatory of Think Tanks], Analysis and articles on Européans and French TT.
*[http://www.policyexperts.org Policy Experts - The Insider Guide to Policy Experts and Organizations] - It is envisioned as the essential guide to the best and the brightest thinkers and policy and policy organizations in the United States and around the world.


== Further reading ==
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* Abelson, Donald E. ''Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes.'' Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002.
* Arin, Kubilay Yado: ''Think Tanks, the Brain Trusts of US Foreign Policy''. Wiesbaden: VS Springer 2013.
* Boucher, Stephen, et al., ''Europe and its think tanks; a promise to be fulfilled. An analysis of think tanks specialised in European policy issues in the enlarged European Union'', Studies and Research No 35, October, Paris, Notre Europe, 2004 [https://web.archive.org/web/20080910014457/http://www.notre-europe.eu/uploads/tx_publication/Etud35-en.pdf PDF]
* Cockett, Richard, ''Thinking the unthinkable: think tanks and the economic counter revolution; 1931–1983'', London: Fontana, 1995.
* {{Cite journal |last=Cotton |first=James |date=2016 |title=Chatham House and Africa c1920–1960: The Limitations of the Curtis Vision |journal=South African Historical Journal |volume=68 |issue=2 |pages=147–162 |doi=10.1080/02582473.2016.1182206 |s2cid=164140516}}
* Dickson, Paul. "Think Tanks". New York: Ballantine Books, 1972. 397 pages.
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20060509013941/http://www.ncpa.org/pub/special/20051220-sp.html Goodman, John C. "What is a Think Tank?" National Center for Policy Analysis, 2005.]
* [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/15/AR2005051501035.html Fan, Maureen. "Capital Brain Trust Puts Stamp on the World", ''Washington Post'' (16 May 2005): B01.]
* [[Patrick Dixon]]. ''[[Futurewise (book)|Futurewise]] – Six Faces of Global Change'' – issues covered by Think Tanks and methodology for reviewing trends, impact on policy 2003): Profile Books
* Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl (2016): The Politics of Think Tanks in Europe. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
* [[George Lakoff|Lakoff, George]]. ''[[Moral Politics]]: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't.'' Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
* Ladi, Stella. ''Globalisation, Policy Transfer And Policy Research Institutes'', Edward Elgar, 2005.
* McGann, James (2006) ''[https://web.archive.org/web/20110928115352/http://www.e-elgar.co.uk/Bookentry_Main.lasso?id=2756 Comparative Think Tanks, Politics And Public Policy]'', Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing
* Mendizabal, Enrique and Kristen Sample (2009) "[http://www.idea.int/publications/thinking_politics/index.cfm?renderforprint=1 Dime a quien escuchas... Think Tanks y Partidos Politicos en America Latina]{{Dead link|date=October 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}", ODI/IDEA: Lima
* Medvetz, Thomas (2012) "[http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo13181062.html Think Tanks in America] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121011065138/http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo13181062.html |date=11 October 2012 }}", Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
* Phelps, Richard P. (2015). ''[http://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Essays/v7n3.htm The Gauntlet: Think Tanks and Federal Research Centers Misrepresent and Suppress Other Education Research] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150209105310/http://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Essays/v7n3.htm |date=9 February 2015 }}'' New Educational Foundations, 4.
* Ranquet, Robert. ''Think Tanks and the National Security Strategy Formulation Process: A Comparison of Current American and French Patterns'', 1997. [https://web.archive.org/web/20070207190804/http://www.dau.mil/pubs/arq/97arq/ranque.pdf PDF]
* {{Cite journal |last=Roberts |first=Priscilla |date=2015 |title=A century of international affairs think tanks in historical perspective |journal=International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis |volume=70 |issue=4 |pages=535–555 |doi=10.1177/0020702015590591 |hdl-access=free |hdl=10722/210910 |s2cid=155138921}}
* Smith, James. A. ''The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite, New York: The Free Press'', 1991.
* [http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/18306.html Snider, J.H. "Strengthen Think Tank Accountability", ''Politico'' (3 February 2009).] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090423091520/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/18306.html |date=23 April 2009 }}
* Stone, Diane. Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private-public policy nexus in the global agora. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
* {{Cite journal |last=Stone |first=Diane |date=2009 |title=Rapid knowledge: 'Bridging research and policy' at the Overseas Development Institute |url=http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/details.asp?id=169&title=bridging-research-policy-international-development-context-evidence-links |journal=Public Administration and Development |volume=29 |issue=4 |pages=303–315 |doi=10.1002/pad.540 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100220164855/http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/details.asp?id=169&title=bridging-research-policy-international-development-context-evidence-links |archive-date=20 February 2010 |access-date=23 July 2010 }}
* Stone, Diane. ''Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process'', London: Frank Cass, 1996
* {{Cite journal |last=Stone |first=Diane |date=2007 |title=Garbage Cans, Recycling Bins or Think Tanks? Three Myths about Policy Institutes |url=http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1798/1/WRAP_Stone_PA_Garbage_Bins_2.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1798/1/WRAP_Stone_PA_Garbage_Bins_2.pdf |archive-date=9 October 2022 |url-status=live |journal=Public Administration |volume=85 |issue=2 |pages=259–278 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x }}
* Stone, Diane, and Andrew Denham, eds. ''Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas.'' Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004.
* Struyk, Raymond J. ''Managing Think Tanks: Practical Guidance for Maturing Organizations'', Budapest, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Washington DC., Urban Institute 2002
* UNDP – United Nations Development Program. ''Thinking the Unthinkable'', Bratislava, UNDP Regional Bureau for Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States, 2003
{{Refend}}


{{Commons category|Think tanks}}
'''Examples of think tanks:'''
*[[The Lincoln Square Institute]], a Chicago based, bipartisan think tank, publisher of the online Campaign Power Rating
*[[The Atlantic Council of the United States]], Washington DC based, a bipartisan, foreign policy-oriented think tank
*[[Center for Economic and Policy Research]], Washington, DC think tank focused on domestic and international economic policy
*[[The Council on Foreign Relations]], New York and Washington DC based, a foreign policy-making think tank
*[[The Forum Alpinum]]
*[[The Cato Institute]], a libertarian think-tank based in Washington, D.C.
*[[The Venezie Institute]], the first Venetian think tank, based on the traditional Venetian principles of: free market, institutional integrity, limited government and individual liberty.
*[[The Fabian Society]], London-based, left of centre think tank, associated with the United Kingdom [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour Party]]
*[[Institute for Collaborative Engagement]], A US based think tank working on global issues
*[[The Foreign Policy Centre]], London-based think tank
*[[USAK]], Ankara-based Turkish think tank
*[[Strategic Foresight Group]], an India based think tank, working on global issues
*[[Captus]], Swedish free-market think-tank
*[[Tennessee Center for Policy Research]], one of over 40 state-based free market think tanks in the United States.
*[[The Roosevelt Institution]], a student think tank based in the [[United States|USA]]
* [[International Institute for Non-Aligned Studies]], a think tank based in India for Non-Aligned Movement
*[[Knights of the North]], a think tank of progressive Freemasons based in North America.
*[[Centre for the New Europe]], Europe's leading Brussels-based free-market think tank
*[[Demos (UK think tank)|Demos]] is a UK based think tank focusing on public services; science and technology ; cities and public space; arts and culture; global security, and public communication.
*[[StateofHumanity.org - The Public Think Tank]], A Web-based Public Think Tank Dedicated to the Interdisciplinary Dialogue on the State of Humanity.
*[[Theos - The Public Theology Think Tank]], Theos is a public theology think tank which exists to undertake research and provide commentary on social and political arrangements.


{{Authority control}}
[[Category:International relations]]
[[Category:Non-governmental organizations]]
[[Category:Non-profit organizations]]
[[Category:Think tanks|*]]


[[cs:Think tank]]
[[Category:Think tanks| ]]
[[da:Tænketank]]
[[de:Denkfabrik]]
[[el:Δεξαμενή σκέψης]]
[[et:Mõttekoda]]
[[es:Think tank]]
[[eo:Pensfabriko]]
[[fr:Think tank]]
[[it:Think tank]]
[[he:צוות חשיבה]]
[[lt:Idėjų kalvė]]
[[hu:Agytröszt]]
[[nl:Denktank]]
[[ja:シンクタンク]]
[[no:Tankesmie]]
[[pl:Think tank]]
[[pt:Think tank]]
[[fi:Ajatusmylly]]
[[sv:Tankesmedja]]
[[ta:மதியுரையகம்]]
[[zh:智庫]]

Latest revision as of 18:08, 16 May 2024

Brookings Institution, founded in 1916 in Washington, D.C.
The Heritage Foundation, founded in 1973 in Washington, D.C.
Stanford University's Hoover Institution, founded in 1919 by U.S. President Herbert Hoover

A think tank, or policy institute, is a research institute that performs research and advocacy concerning topics such as social policy, political strategy, economics, military, technology, and culture. Most think tanks are non-governmental organizations, but some are semi-autonomous agencies within government, and some are associated with particular political parties, businesses or the military.[1] Think tanks are often funded by individual donations, with many also accepting government grants.[2]

Think tanks publish articles and studies, and sometimes draft legislation on particular matters of policy or society. This information is then used by governments, businesses, media organizations, social movements or other interest groups.[3][4] Think tanks range from those associated with highly academic or scholarly activities to those that are overtly ideological and pushing for particular policies, with a wide range among them in terms of the quality of their research. Later generations of think tanks have tended to be more ideologically oriented.[3] Modern think tanks began as a phenomenon in the United Kingdom in the 19th and early 20th centuries, with most of the rest being established in other English-speaking countries.[3][5] Prior to 1945, they tended to focus on the economic issues associated with industrialization and urbanization. During the Cold War, many more American and other Western think tanks were established, which often guided government Cold War policy.[3][6][4]

Since 1991, more think tanks have been established in non-Western parts of the world. More than half of all think tanks that exist today were established after 1980.[5] There are over 11,000 think tanks around the world.[7][8]

History[edit]

According to historian Jacob Soll, while the term "think tank" is modern, with its origin "traced to the humanist academies and scholarly networks of the 16th and 17th centuries," Soll writes that, "in Europe, the origins of think tanks go back to the 800s when emperors and kings began arguing with the Catholic Church about taxes. A tradition of hiring teams of independent lawyers to advise monarchs about their financial and political prerogatives against the church spans from Charlemagne all the way to the 17th century, when the kings of France were still arguing about whether they had the right to appoint bishops and receive a cut of their income."

Soll cites as an early example the Académie des frères Dupuy, created in Paris around 1620 by the brothers Pierre and Jacques Dupuy and also known after 1635 as the cabinet des frères Dupuy.[9] The Club de l'Entresol, active in Paris between 1723 and 1731, was another prominent example of an early independent think tank focusing on public policy and current affairs, especially economics and foreign affairs.[10]

19th century[edit]

Several major current think tanks were founded in the 19th century. The Royal United Services Institute was founded in 1831 in London, and the Fabian Society in 1884.

20th century[edit]

The oldest United States-based think tank, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, was founded in Washington, D.C., in 1910 by philanthropist Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie charged trustees to use the fund to "hasten the abolition of international war, the foulest blot upon our civilization."[11] The Brookings Institution was founded shortly thereafter in 1916 by Robert S. Brookings and was conceived as a bipartisan "research center modeled on academic institutions and focused on addressing the questions of the federal government."[12]

In the early 1920s, fascist and other far-right think tanks appeared in the Netherlands.[13]

After 1945, the number of policy institutes increased, with many small new ones forming to express various issues and policy agendas. Until the 1940s, most think tanks were known only by the name of the institution. During the Second World War, think tanks were often referred to as "brain boxes".[14]

Before the 1950s, the phrase "think tank" did not refer to organizations. From its first appearances in the 1890s up to the 1950s, the phrase was most commonly used in American English to colloquially refer to the braincase or especially in a pejorative context to the human brain itself when commenting on an individual's failings (in the sense that something was wrong with that person's "think tank").[15]: 25  Around 1958, the first organization to be regularly described in published writings as "the Think Tank" (note the title case and the use of the definite article) was the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences.[15]: 26  However, the Center does not count itself as and is not perceived to be a think tank in the contemporary sense.[15]: 26  During the 1960s, the phrase "think tank" was attached more broadly to meetings of experts, electronic computers,[15]: 27  and independent military planning organizations.[15]: 26  The prototype and most prominent example of the third category was the RAND Corporation, which was founded in 1946 as an offshoot of Douglas Aircraft and became an independent corporation in 1948.[15]: 70 [16] In the 1970s, the phrase became more specifically defined in terms of RAND and others.[15]: 28  During the 1980s and 1990s, the phrase evolved again to arrive at its broader contemporary meaning of an independent public policy research institute.[15]: 28 

For most of the 20th century, such institutes were found primarily in the United States, along with much smaller numbers in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Western Europe. Although think tanks had also existed in Japan for some time, they generally lacked independence, having close associations with government ministries or corporations. There has been a veritable proliferation of "think tanks" around the world that began during the 1980s as a result of globalization, the end of the Cold War, and the emergence of transnational problems. Two-thirds of all the think tanks that exist today were established after 1970 and more than half were established since 1980.[5]

The effect of globalisation on the proliferation of think tanks is most evident in regions such as Africa, Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and parts of Southeast Asia, where there was a concerted effort by other countries to assist in the creation of independent public policy research organizations. A survey performed by the Foreign Policy Research Institute's Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program underscores the significance of this effort and documents the fact that most of the think tanks in these regions have been established since 1992.

21st century[edit]

As of 2014, there were more than 11,000 of these institutions worldwide.[7][8] Many of the more established think tanks, created during the Cold War, are focused on international affairs, security studies, and foreign policy.[5]

Types[edit]

Think tanks vary by ideological perspectives, sources of funding, topical emphasis and prospective consumers.[17] Funding may also represent who or what the institution wants to influence; in the United States, for example, "Some donors want to influence votes in Congress or shape public opinion, others want to position themselves or the experts they fund for future government jobs, while others want to push specific areas of research or education."[17]

A new trend, resulting from globalization, is collaboration between policy institutes in different countries. For instance, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace operates offices in Washington, D.C., Beijing, Beirut, Brussels and formerly in Moscow, where it was closed in April 2022.[17]

The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) at the University of Pennsylvania, led by James McGann, annually rates policy institutes worldwide in a number of categories and presents its findings in the Global Go-To Think Tanks rating index.[18] However, this method of the study and assessment of policy institutes has been criticized by researchers such as Enrique Mendizabal and Goran Buldioski, Director of the Think Tank Fund, assisted by the Open Society Institute.[19][20]

Advocacy[edit]

In some cases, corporate interests,[21] military interests[1] and political groups have found it useful to create policy institutes, advocacy organizations, and think tanks. For example, The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition was formed in the mid-1990s to dispute research finding an association between second-hand smoke and cancer.[22] Military contractors may spend a portion of their tender on funding pro-war think tanks.[1] According to an internal memorandum from Philip Morris Companies referring to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), "The credibility of the EPA is defeatable, but not on the basis of ETS [environmental tobacco smoke] alone,... It must be part of a larger mosaic that concentrates all the EPA's enemies against it at one time."[23]

According to the progressive media watchdog Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, both left-wing and right-wing policy institutes are often quoted and rarely identified as such. The result is that think tank "experts" are sometimes depicted as neutral sources without any ideological predispositions when, in fact, they represent a particular perspective.[24][25] In the United States, think tank publications on education are subjected to expert review by the National Education Policy Center's "Think Twice" think tank review project.[26]

A 2014 New York Times report asserted that foreign governments buy influence at many United States think tanks. According to the article: "More than a dozen prominent Washington research groups have received tens of millions of dollars from foreign governments in recent years while pushing United States government officials to adopt policies that often reflect the donors' priorities."[27]

Global think tanks[edit]

African think tanks[edit]

Ghana[edit]

Ghana's first president, Kwame Nkrumah, set up various state-supported think tanks in the 1960s. By the 1990s, a variety of policy research centers sprang up in Africa set up by academics who sought to influence public policy in Ghana.

One such think tank was The Institute of Economic Affairs, Ghana, which was founded in 1989 when the country was ruled by the Provisional National Defence Council. The IEA undertakes and publishes research on a range of economic and governance issues confronting Ghana and Sub-Saharan Africa. It has also been involved in bringing political parties together to engage in dialogue. In particular it has organised Presidential debates every election year since the Ghanaian presidential election, 1996.

Notable think tanks in Ghana include:

Morocco[edit]

  • AMAQUEN,[28] founded in 2003, is a think tank in the field of education through its publications (rapports),[29][30] international scientific journal The Journal of Quality in Education,[31] and international events (CIMQUSEF).[32]

Somalia[edit]

South Africa[edit]

Asian think tanks[edit]

Afghanistan[edit]

Afghanistan has a number of think tanks that are in the form of governmental, non-governmental, and corporate organizations.

Bangladesh[edit]

Bangladesh has a number of think tanks that are in the form of governmental, non-governmental, and corporate organizations.

China[edit]

In China a number of think tanks are sponsored by governmental agencies such as Development Research Center of the State Council, but still retain sufficient non-official status to be able to propose and debate ideas more freely. In January 2012, the first non-official think tank in mainland China, South Non-Governmental Think-Tank, was established in the Guangdong province.[33] In 2009 the China Center for International Economic Exchanges was founded.

Hong Kong[edit]

In Hong Kong, early think tanks established in the late 1980s and early 1990s focused on political development, including the first direct Legislative Council members election in 1991 and the political framework of "One Country, Two Systems", manifested in the Sino-British Joint Declaration. After the transfer of sovereignty to China in 1997, more think tanks were established by various groups of intellectuals and professionals. They have various missions and objectives including promoting civic education; undertaking research on economic, social and political policies; and promoting "public understanding of and participation in the political, economic, and social development of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region".

Think tanks in Hong Kong include:

India[edit]

India has the world's second-largest number of think tanks.[34] Most are based in New Delhi, and a few are government-sponsored.[citation needed] There are few think tanks that promote environmentally responsible and climate resilient ideas like Centre for Science and Environment, Centre for Policy Research and World Resources Institute.[35][36][37] There are other prominent think tanks like Observer Research Foundation, Tillotoma Foundation and Centre for Civil Society.[citation needed]

In Mumbai, Strategic Foresight Group is a global think tank that works on issues such as Water Diplomacy, Peace and Conflict and Foresight (futures studies). Think tanks with a development focus include those like the National Centre for Cold-chain Development ('NCCD'), which serve to bring an inclusive policy change by supporting the Planning Commission and related government bodies with industry-specific inputs – in this case, set up at the behest of the government to direct cold chain development. Some think tanks have a fixed set of focus areas and they work towards finding out policy solutions to social problems in the respective areas.

Initiatives such as National e-Governance Plan (to automate administrative processes)[38] and National Knowledge Network (NKN) (for data and resource sharing amongst education and research institutions), if implemented properly, should help improve the quality of work done by think tanks.[39]

Think tanks in India are growing across the length and breadth of the country as they are no longer limited to metro cities. Think tanks for the young, like RisingIndia ThinkTank, have emerged from one of the smallest city in Rajasthan state of India.

Indonesia[edit]

Iraq[edit]

Over 50 think tanks have emerged in Iraq, particularly in the Kurdistan Region. Iraq's leading think tank is the Middle East Research Institute (MERI),[40] based in Erbil. MERI is an independent non-governmental policy research organization, established in 2014 and publishes in English, Kurdish, and Arabic. It was listed in the global ranking by the United States's Lauder Institute of the University of Pennsylvania as 46th in the Middle East.[41]

Israel[edit]

There are many think tank teams in Israel, including:[42]

South Korea[edit]

In South Korea, think tanks are prolific and influential and are a government go-to. Think tanks are prolific in the Korean landscape. Many policy research organisations in Korea focus on economoy and most research is done in public think tanks. There is a strong emphasis on the knowledge-based economy and, according to one respondent, think tank research is generally considered high quality. [43]

Japan[edit]

Japan has over 100 think tanks, most of which cover not only policy research but also economy, technology and so on. Some are government related, but most of the think tanks are sponsored by the private sector.[citation needed]

Kazakhstan[edit]

Institute of World Economics and Politics (IWEP) at the Foundation of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan was created in 2003. IWEP activities aimed at research problems of the world economy, international relations, geopolitics, security, integration and Eurasia, as well as the study of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan and its contribution to the establishment and strengthening of Kazakhstan as an independent state, the development of international cooperation and the promotion of peace and stability.[44][45]

The Kazakhstan Institute for Strategic Studies under the President of the RK (KazISS) was established by the Decree of the President of RK on 16 June 1993. Since its foundation the main mission of the Kazakhstan Institute for Strategic Studies under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as a national think tank, is to maintain analytical and research support for the President of Kazakhstan.[46]

Malaysia[edit]

Most Malaysian think tanks are related either to the government or a political party. Historically they focused on defense, politics and policy. However, in recent years, think tanks that focus on international trade, economics, and social sciences have also been founded.

Notable think tanks in Malaysia include:

Pakistan[edit]

Pakistan's think tanks mainly revolve around social policy, internal politics, foreign security issues, and regional geo-politics. Most of these are centered on the capital, Islamabad. One such think tank is the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), which focuses on policy advocacy and research particularly in the area of environment and social development.

Another policy research institute based in Islamabad is the Institute of Social and Policy Sciences (I-SAPS) which works in the fields of education, health, disaster risk reduction, governance, conflict and stabilization. Since 2007 - 2008, I-SAPS has been analyzing public expenditure of federal and provincial governments.[49]

Philippines[edit]

Think tanks in the Philippines could be generally categorized in terms of their linkages with the national government. Several were set up by the Philippine government for the specific purpose of providing research input into the policy-making process.[50]

Russia[edit]

Sri Lanka[edit]

Sri Lanka has a number of think tanks that are in the form of governmental, non-governmental and corporate organizations.

Singapore[edit]

There are several think tanks in Singapore that advise the government on various policies and as well as private ones for corporations within the region. Many of them are hosted within the local public educational institutions.

Among them are the Singapore Institute of International Affairs (SIIA), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), and the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.[51]

Taiwan[edit]

In 2017 Taiwan had 58 think tanks.[52] As in most countries there is a mix of government- and privately-funded think tanks.[53]

Taiwanese think tanks in alphabetical order:

Thailand[edit]

United Arab Emirates[edit]

The UAE has been a center for political oriented think tanks which concentrate on both regional and global policy. Notable think tank have emerged in the global debate on terrorism, education & economical policies in the MENA region. Think tanks include:

Uzbekistan[edit]

  • CED[54]Center for Economic Development (Центр Содействия Экономическому Развитию) is a think tank whose major tasks are: analytic support in economic reforming and development in Uzbekistan; improving knowledge and skills of the subjects of economic development; assistance in productive dialogue between the government, civil society and private sectors on the economic development matters.

Key projects: Preparation of the National human development report for Uzbekistan, Sociological "portrait" of the Uzbek businessman, Preparation of an analytical report on export procedures optimization in Uzbekistan, various industry and marketing researches in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan.

European think tanks[edit]

Belgium[edit]

Brussels hosts most of the European Institutions, hence a large number of international think tanks are based there. Notable think tanks are Bruegel, the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Centre for the New Europe (CNE), the European Centre of International Political Economy (ECIPE), the European Policy Centre (EPC), the Friends of Europe, the Global Governance Institute (GGI), Liberales, and Sport and Citizenship, among others.

Bulgaria[edit]

Bulgaria has a number of think tanks providing expertise and shaping policies, including Institute of Modern Politics.

Czech Republic[edit]

Denmark[edit]

  • CEPOS is a classic liberal/free-market conservative think tank in Denmark.

Finland[edit]

Finland has several small think tanks that provide expertise in very specific fields. Notable think tanks include:

In addition to specific independent think tanks, the largest political parties have their own think tank organizations. This is mainly due to support granted by state for such activity. The corporate world has focused their efforts to central representative organization Confederation of Finnish Industries, which acts as think tank in addition to negotiating salaries with workers unions. Furthermore, there is the Finnish Business and Policy Forum (Elinkeinoelämän valtuuskunta, EVA). Agricultural and regional interests, associated with The Central Union of Agricultural Producers and Forest Owners (Maa- ja metsätaloustuottajain Keskusliitto, MTK) and the Centre Party, are researched by Pellervo Economic Research (Pellervon taloustutkimus, PTT). The Central Organisation of Finnish Trade Unions (Suomen Ammattiliittojen Keskusjärjestö, SAK) and the Social Democratic Party are associated with the Labour Institute for Economic Research (Palkansaajien tutkimuslaitos, PT). The Finns Party established its own think tank, Suomen Perusta, in 2012.[63] Each of these organizations often release forecasts concerning the national economy.

France[edit]

The French Institute of International Relations (IFRI) was founded in 1979 and is the third oldest think tank of western Europe, after Chatham House (UK, 1920) and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sweden, 1960). The primary goals of IFRI are to develop applied research in the field of public policy related to international issues, and foster interactive and constructive dialogue between researchers, professionals, and opinion leaders. France also hosts the European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), a Paris-based agency of the European Union and think tank researching security issues of relevance for the EU. There are also a number of pro-business think tanks, notably the Paris-based Fondation Concorde.[64] The foundation focuses on increasing the competitiveness of French SME's and aims to revive entrepreneurship in France.

On the left, the main think tanks in France are the Fondation Jean-Jaurès, which is organizationally linked to the French Socialist Party, and Terra Nova. Terra Nova is an independent left-leaning think tank, although it is nevertheless considered to be close to the Socialists. It works on producing reports and analyses of current public policy issues from a progressive point of view, and contributing to the intellectual renewal of social democracy.

The only French Think Tank mentioned in the "think tanks to watch" list of the 2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report[65] GenerationLibre [fr] is a French think tank created by Gaspard Koenig in 2013, independent from all political parties, which aims at promoting freedoms in France, in terms of fundamental rights, economics and societal issues. GenerationLibre is described as being able to connect to the right on pro business freedom and regulations issues but also to the left on issues such as basic income, gay marriage and the legalization of marijuana.

Germany[edit]

In Germany all of the major parties are loosely associated with research foundations that play some role in shaping policy, but generally from the more disinterested role of providing research to support policymakers than explicitly proposing policy. These include the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (Christian Democratic Union-aligned), the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (Social Democratic Party-aligned), the Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung (Christian Social Union-aligned), the Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (aligned with the Greens), Friedrich Naumann Foundation (Free Democratic Party-aligned) and the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (aligned with Die Linke).

The German Institute for International and Security Affairs is a foreign policy think tank. Atlantic Community is an independent, non-partisan and non-profit organization set up as a joint project of Atlantische Initiative e.V. and Atlantic Initiative United States. The Institute for Media and Communication Policy deals with media-related issues. Transparency International is a think tank on the role of corporate and political corruption in international development.

Greece[edit]

In Greece there are many think tanks, also called research organisations or institutes.

Ireland[edit]

  • The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) is an independent research institute in Dublin, Ireland. Its research focuses on Ireland's economic and social development to inform policy-making and societal understanding.
  • The Institute of International and European Affairs (IIEA) focuses on European and International affairs.
  • The Iona Institute is a conservative, Catholic think tank.
  • TASC (Think tank for Action on Social Change) is an Irish left-wing think tank.
  • Transhuman Corporation is a research think tank that focuses on cyber and technology development.

Italy[edit]

Latvia[edit]

While think tanks are not widespread in Latvia, as opposed to single-issue advocacy organizations, there are several noticeable institutions in the Latvian think tank landscape:

  • The oldest think tank in Latvia is the Latvian Institute of International Affairs.[66] LIIA is a non governmental and non partisan foundation, established in 1992, and their research and advocacy mainly focuses on Latvian foreign policy; Transatlantic relations; European Union policies, including its neighborhood policy and Eastern Partnership; and multilateral and bilateral relations with Russia.
  • Centre for Public policy PROVIDUS[67] is a non governmental and non partisan association, established in 2002. Providus focuses their work (both research and advocacy) on topics especially relevant in transition and post-transition environments and Latvia in particular: good governance; criminal justice policy; tolerance and inclusive public policy and European policy.

Several think tanks are established and operate under the auspices of Universities, such as:

  • Centre for European and transition studies[68] is a think tank working under the auspices of the University of Latvia, the largest public university in the country. CETS was established in 2000.
  • or Defense research centre[69] in 1992 under the auspices of the National Academy of Defense.

Lithuania[edit]

Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis (VIPA) is an independent non-governmental, non-profit, non-partisan policy think tank in Lithuania whose mission is to stand for the principles of open society, liberal democracy, rule of law and human rights. VIPA acts via advocacy for strong and safe European Union, analyzing and advocating for anti-authoritarian, transparent, and open governance ideas in Central and Eastern Europe, is an opinion leader offering an alternative opinion to the public versus populism, radicalism, and authoritarian trends, reinforcing active citizens' participation in decision making, analyzing fake news, disinformation, and offering media literacy initiatives, putting forward solutions to improve the accountability, transparency, and openness of Lithuania's public sector, building a network of open society values oriented experts, civil activists and NGO's.[70]

Netherlands[edit]

All major political parties in the Netherlands have state-sponsored research foundations that play a role in shaping policy. The Dutch government also has its own think tank: the Scientific Council for Government Policy. The Netherlands furthermore hosts the Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, or Clingendael Institute, an independent think tank and diplomatic academy which studies various aspects of international relations.

Poland[edit]

There is a large pool of think tanks in Poland on a wide variety of subjects. The oldest state-sponsored think tank is The Western Institute in Poznań (Polish: Instytut Zachodni). The second oldest is the Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM) established in 1947. Another notable state-sponsored think tank is the Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW), which specializes in the countries neighboring Poland and in the Baltic Sea region, the Balkans, Turkey, the Caucasus and Central Asia. Among the private think tanks notable organizations include the Institute for Structural Research (IBS) on economic policy, The Casimir Pulaski Foundation on foreign policy, the Institute of Public Affairs (ISP) on social policy, and the Sobieski Institute.

Portugal[edit]

Founded in 1970, the SEDES is one of the oldest Portuguese civic associations and think tanks. Contraditório think tank was founded in 2008. Contraditório is a non-profit, independent and non-partisan think tank.

Romania[edit]

The Romanian Academic Society (SAR), founded in 1996, is a Romanian think tank for policy research.

Russia[edit]

Serbia[edit]

The Foundation for the Advancement of Economics (FREN) was founded in 2005 by the Belgrade University's Faculty of Economics.

Slovakia[edit]

Think tanks originating in Slovakia:

  • GLOBSEC – Global think tank committed to enhancing security, prosperity and sustainability in Europe and throughout the world.
  • Central European Labour Studies Institute or CELSI (Stredoeurópsky inštitút pre výskum práce in Slovak) – Central-european think tank which specializes in broadly defined labor issues, labour markets, and labor policy.
  • Forum Minority Research Institute (Fórum Kisebbségkutató Intézet or Fórum Intézet in Hungarian and Fórum inštitút pre výskum menšín or Fórum inštitút in Slovak) – Think tank focusing on ethnic minorities living in Slovakia, especially Hungarians.

International think tanks with presence in Slovakia:

  • Institute of Public Affairs (Inštitút pre verejné otázky or IVO in Slovak) – Australian-based think tank focusing on public policy issues.
  • Open Society Foundations or OSF – US-based think tank with an aim of advancing justice, education, public health and independent media.
  • Martens Centre (via the Anton Tunega Foundation[71]) – Belgium-based think tank and political foundation of the European People's Party (EPP) which embodies a pan-European mindset and promotes Christian-democratic and liberal-conservative political values.

Spain[edit]

The Elcano Royal Institute was created in 2001 following the example of the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) in the UK, although it is closely linked to (and receives funding from) the government in power.[72]

More independent but clearly to the left of the political spectrum are the Centro de Investigaciones de Relaciones Internacionales y Desarrollo (CIDOB) founded in 1973; and the Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE) established in 1999 by Diego Hidalgo and main driving force behind projects such as the Club de Madrid, a group of democratic former heads of state and government, the Foreign Policy Spanish Edition and DARA.[citation needed]

Former Prime Minister José Maria Aznar presides over the Fundación para el Analisis y los Estudios Sociales (FAES), a policy institute that is associated with the conservative Popular Party (PP). Also linked to the PP is the Grupo de Estudios Estratégicos (GEES), which is known for its defense- and security-related research and analysis. For its part, the Fundación Alternativas is independent but close to left-wing ideas. The Socialist Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE) created Fundación Ideas in 2009 and dissolved it in January 2014. Also in 2009, the centrist Union, Progress and Democracy (UPyD) created Fundación Progreso y Democracia (FPyD).

Sweden[edit]

Timbro is a free market think tank and book publisher based in Stockholm.

Switzerland[edit]

Think tanks based within Switzerland include:

Ukraine[edit]

There are more than 100 registered think tanks in Ukraine[citation needed], including:

United Kingdom[edit]

In Britain, think tanks play a similar role to the United States, attempting to shape policy, and indeed there is some cooperation between British and American think tanks. For example, the London-based think tank Chatham House and the Council on Foreign Relations were both conceived at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919 and have remained sister organisations.

The Bow Group, founded in 1951, is the oldest centre-right think tank and many of its members have gone on to serve as Members of Parliament or Members of the European Parliament. Past chairmen have included Conservative Party leader Michael Howard, Margaret Thatcher's longest-serving Cabinet Minister Geoffrey Howe, Chancellor of the Exchequer Norman Lamont and former British Telecom chairman Christopher Bland.

Since 2000, a number of influential centre-right think tanks have emerged including Policy Exchange, Centre for Social Justice and most recently Onward.[77]

Oceanian think tanks[edit]

Australia[edit]

Most Australian think tanks are based at universities – for example, the Melbourne Institute – or are government-funded – for example, the Productivity Commission or the CSIRO.

Private sources fund about 20 to 30 "independent" Australian think tanks.[78] The best-known of these think tanks play a much more limited role in Australian public and business policy-making than do their equivalents in the United States. However, in the past decade[which?] the number of think tanks has increased substantially.[citation needed] Prominent Australian conservative think tanks include the Centre for Independent Studies, the Sydney Institute and the Institute of Public Affairs. Prominent leftist Australian think tanks include the McKell Institute, Per Capita, the Australia Institute, the Lowy Institute and the Centre for Policy Development. In recent years[when?] regionally-based independent and non-partisan think tanks have emerged.[citation needed]

Some think tanks, such as the Illawarra's i-eat-drink-think, engage in discussion, research and advocacy within a broader civics framework. Commercial think tanks like the Gartner Group, Access Economics, the Helmsman Institute, and others provide additional insight which complements not-for-profit organisations such as CEDA, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, and the Australian Institute of Company Directors to provide more targeted policy in defence, program governance, corporate governance and similar.[citation needed]

Think tanks in Australia include:

New Zealand[edit]

Think tanks based in New Zealand include:

North American think tanks[edit]

Canada[edit]

Canada has many notable think tanks (listed in alphabetical order). Each has specific areas of interest with some overlaps.

Mexico[edit]

  • CIDAC – The Center of Research for Development (Centro de Investigación para el Desarrollo, Asociación Civil) is a not-for-profit think tank that undertakes research and proposes viable policy options for Mexico's economic and democratic development. The organization seeks to promote open, pluralistic debate pursuing: the Rule of Law & Democracy, market economics, social development, and strengthening Mexico-United States relations.
  • CIDE – The Center of Research and Economics Teaching (Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas) is a think tank institute focussing on "public policies", "public choice", "democracy", and "economy".
  • COMEXI – The Mexican Council of International Affairs (Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales).

United States[edit]

As the classification is most often used today, the oldest American think tank is the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, founded in 1910.[85] The Institute for Government Research, which later merged with two organizations to form the Brookings Institution, was formed in 1916. Other early twentieth century organizations now classified as think tanks include the Hoover Institution (1919), The Twentieth Century Fund (1919, and now known as the Century Foundation), the National Bureau of Economic Research (1920), the Council on Foreign Relations (1921), and the Social Science Research Council (1923). The Great Depression and its aftermath spawned several economic policy organizations, such as the National Planning Association (1934), the Tax Foundation (1937),[86] and the Committee for Economic Development (1943).[85]

In collaboration with the Douglas Aircraft Company, the Air Force set up the RAND Corporation in 1946 to develop weapons technology and strategic defense analysis.

The Hudson Institute is a conservative American think tank founded in 1961 by futurist, military strategist, and systems theorist Herman Kahn and his colleagues at the RAND Corporation. Recent members include Mike Pompeo, the former secretary of state under Donald Trump who joined in 2021.[87]

More recently, progressive and liberal think tanks have been established, most notably the Center for American Progress and the Center for Research on Educational Access and Leadership (CREAL). The organization has close ties to former United States President Barack Obama and other prominent Democrats.[88]

Think tanks help shape both foreign and domestic policy. They receive funding from private donors, and members of private organizations. By 2013, the largest 21 think tanks in the US spent more than US$1 billion per year.[89] Think tanks may feel more free to propose and debate controversial ideas than people within government. The progressive media watchdog Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) has identified the top 25 think tanks by media citations, noting that from 2006 to 2007 the number of citations declined 17%.[90] The FAIR report reveals the ideological breakdown of the citations: 37% conservative, 47% centrist, and 16% liberal. Their data show that the most-cited think tank was the Brookings Institution, followed by the Council on Foreign Relations, the American Enterprise Institute, The Heritage Foundation, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

In 2016, in response to scrutiny about think tanks appearing to have a "conflict of interest" or lack transparency, executive vice president, Martin S. Indyk of Brookings Institution – the "most prestigious think tank in the world"[91] admitted that they had "decided to prohibit corporations or corporate-backed foundations from making anonymous contributions." In August 2016, The New York Times published a series on think tanks that blur the line. One of the cases the journalists cited was Brookings, where scholars paid by a seemingly independent think tank "push donors' agendas amplifying a culture of corporate influence in Washington." For example, in exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars the Brookings Institution provided Lennar – one of the United States' largest home builders – with a significant advantage in pursuing a US$8 billion revitalization project in Hunters Point, San Francisco. In 2014, Lennar's then-regional vice president in charge of the San Francisco revitalization, Kofi Bonner was named as a Brookings senior fellow – a position as 'trusted adviser' that carries some distinction. Bruce Katz, a Brookings vice president, also offered to help Lennar "engage with national media to develop stories that highlight Lennar's innovative approach."[91]

U.S. government think tanks[edit]

Government think tanks are also important in the United States, particularly in the security and defense field. These include the Center for Technology and National Security Policy at the National Defense University, the Center for Naval Warfare Studies at the Naval War College, and the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College.

The government funds, wholly or in part, activities at approximately 30 Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs). FFRDCs, are unique independent nonprofit entities sponsored and funded by the United States government to meet specific long-term technical needs that cannot be met by any other single organization. FFRDCs typically assist government agencies with scientific research and analysis, systems development, and systems acquisition. They bring together the expertise and outlook of government, industry, and academia to solve complex technical problems. These FFRDCs include the RAND Corporation, the MITRE Corporation, the Institute for Defense Analyses, the Aerospace Corporation, the MIT Lincoln Laboratory, and other organizations supporting various departments within the United States Government.

Similar to the above quasi-governmental organizations are Federal Advisory Committees. These groups, sometimes referred to as commissions, are a form of think tank dedicated to advising the US Presidents or the Executive branch of government. They typically focus on a specific issue and as such, might be considered similar to special interest groups. However, unlike special interest groups these committees have come under some oversight regulation and are required to make formal records available to the public. As of 2002, about 1,000 of these advisory committees were described in the FACA searchable database.[92]

South American think tanks[edit]

Research done by Enrique Mendizabal[93] shows that South American think tanks play various roles depending on their origins, historical development and relations to other policy actors. In this study, Orazio Bellettini from Grupo FARO suggests that they:[94]

  • Seek political support for policies.
  • Legitimize policies – This has been clearer in Ecuador, Bolivia and Peru. New governments in Ecuador and Peru have approached policy institutes for support for already defined policies. In Bolivia, the government of Evo Morales has been working with Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) and other research institutes to do the same. However, in Chile, many think tanks during the 1990s seemed to endorse and maintain the legitimacy of policies implemented during the previous decade by the military dictatorship headed by Pinochet.
  • Spaces of debate – In this case think tanks serve as sounding boards for new policies. In Chile, during the Pinochet dictatorship, many left wing intellectuals and researchers found 'asylum' in think tanks. In Ecuador, think tanks are seen as spaces where politicians can test the soundness of their policies and government plans.
  • Financial channels for political parties or other interest groups – In Ecuador and Bolivia, German foundations have been able to provide funds to think tanks that work with certain political parties. This method has provided support to the system as a whole rather than individual CSOs.
  • Expert cadres of policy-makers and politicians – In Peru after the end of the Fujimori regime, and in Chile after the fall of Pinochet, think tank staff left to form part of the new governments. In the United States, the role of major think tanks is precisely that: host scholars for a few months or years and then lose them to government employ.

How a policy institute addresses these largely depends on how they work, their ideology vs. evidence credentials, and the context in which they operate including funding opportunities, the degree and type of competition they have and their staff.

This functional method addresses the inherit challenge of defining a think tank. As Simon James said in 1998, "Discussion of think tanks...has a tendency to get bogged down in the vexed question of defining what we mean by 'think tank'—an exercise that often degenerates into futile semantics."[95] It is better (as in the Network Functions Approach) to describe what the organisation should do. Then the shape of the organisation should follow to allow this to happen. The following framework (based on Stephen Yeo's description of think tanks' mode of work) is described in Enrique Mendizabal's blog "onthinktanks":

First, policy institutes may work in or base their funding on one or more of:[96]

  • Independent research: this would be work done with core or flexible funding that allows the researchers the liberty to choose their research questions and method. It may be long term and could emphasize 'big ideas' without direct policy relevance. However, it could emphasize a major policy problem that requires a thorough research and action investment.
  • Consultancy: this would be work done by commission with specific clients and addressing one or two major questions. Consultancies often respond to an existing agenda.
  • Influencing/advocacy: this would be work done by communications, capacity development, networking, campaigns, lobbying, etc. It is likely to be based on research based evidence emerging from independent research or consultancies.

Second, policy institutes may base their work or arguments on:

  • Ideology, values or interests
  • Applied, empirical or synthesis research
  • Theoretical or academic research

According to the National Institute for Research Advancement, a Japanese policy institute, think tanks are "one of the main policy actors in democratic societies ..., assuring a pluralistic, open and accountable process of policy analysis, research, decision-making and evaluation".[97] A study in early 2009 found a total of 5,465 think tanks worldwide. Of that number, 1,777 were based in the United States and approximately 350 in Washington, DC, alone.[98]

Argentina[edit]

As of 2009, Argentina is home to 122 think tanks, many specializing in public policy and economics issues. Argentina ranks fifth in the number of these institutions worldwide.[99]

Brazil[edit]

Working on public policies, Brazil hosts, for example, Instituto Liberdade, a University-based Center at Tecnopuc inside the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, located in the South Region of the country, in the city of Porto Alegre. Instituto Liberdade is among the Top 40 think tanks in Latin America and the Caribbean, according to the 2009 Global Go To Think Tanks Index[100] a report from the University of Pennsylvania's Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP).

Fundação Getulio Vargas (Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV)) is a Brazilian higher education institution. Its original goal was to train people for the country's public- and private-sector management. Today it hosts faculties (Law, Business, Economics, Social Sciences and Mathematics), libraries, and also research centers in Rio, São Paulo and Brasilia. It is considered by Foreign Policy magazine to be a top-five "policymaker think tank" worldwide.

The Igarapé Institute is a Brazilian think tank focusing on public, climate, and digital security.[101]

Transcontinental countries (Asia-Europe)[edit]

Armenia[edit]

According to a 2020 report, there are 32 think tanks or similar institutions in Armenia.[102]

The government closed the Noravank Foundation, a government-affiliated think tank, in 2018 after almost two decades of operation. However, other think tanks continue to operate, include the Caucasus Institute, the Caucasus Research Resource Center-Armenia (CRRC-Armenia) (which publishes the "Caucasus Barometer" annual public opinion survey of the South Caucasus, the "Enlight" Public Research Center, and the AMBERD research center at the Armenian State University of Economics.[103]

Azerbaijan[edit]

According to research done by the University of Pennsylvania, there are a total of 12 think tanks in Azerbaijan.

The Center for Economic and Social Development, or CESD; in Azeri, Azerbaijan, İqtisadi və Sosial İnkişaf Mərkəzi (İSİM) is an Azeri think tank, non-profit organization, NGO based in Baku, Azerbaijan. The center was established in 2005. CESD focuses on policy advocacy and reform, and is involved with policy research and capacity building.

The Economic Research Center (ERC) is a policy-research oriented non-profit think tank established in 1999 with a mission to facilitate sustainable economic development and good governance in the new public management system of Azerbaijan. It seeks to do this by building favorable interactions between the public, private and civil society and working with different networks both in local (EITI NGO Coalition, National Budget Group, Public Coalition Against Poverty, etc.) and international levels (PWYP, IBP, ENTO, ALDA, PASOS, WTO NGO Network etc.).[citation needed]

The Center for Strategic Studies under the President of Azerbaijan is a governmental, non-profit think tank founded in 2007. It focusses on domestic and foreign policy.

Russia[edit]

According to the Foreign Policy Research Institute, Russia has 112 think tanks, while Russian think tanks claimed four of the top ten spots in 2011's "Top Thirty Think Tanks in Central and Eastern Europe".[104]

Notable Russian think tanks include:

Turkey[edit]

Turkish think tanks are relatively new.[citation needed] There are at least 20 think tanks in the country, both independent and supported by government. Many of them are sister organizations of political parties, universities or companies some are independent and others are supported by government. Most Turkish think tanks provide research and ideas, yet they play less important roles in policy making than American think tanks. Turksam, Tasam and the Journal of Turkish Weekly are the leading information sources.

The oldest and most influential think tank in Turkey is ESAM (The Center for Economic and Social Research; Turkish: Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Merkezi) which was established in 1969 and has headquarters in Ankara. There are also branch offices of ESAM in Istanbul, Bursa, Konya and elsewhere. ESAM has strong international relationships, especially with Muslim countries and societies. Ideologically it performs policies, produces ideas and manages projects in parallel to Milli Görüş and also influences political parties and international strategies. The founder and leader of Milli Görüş, Necmettin Erbakan, was very concerned with the activities and brainstorming events of ESAM. In The Republic of Turkey, two presidents, four prime ministers, various ministers, many members of the parliament, and numerous mayors and bureaucrats have been members of ESAM. Currently the General Chairman of ESAM is Recai Kutan (former minister for two different ministries, former main opposition party leader, and founder and General Chairman of the Saadet Party).[citation needed]

The Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV) is another leading think tank. Established in 1994, TESEV is an independent non-governmental think tank, analyzing social, political and economic policy issues facing Turkey. TESEV has raised issues about Islam and democracy, combating corruption, state reform, and transparency and accountability. TESEV serve as a bridge between academic research and policy-making. Its core program areas are democratization, good governance, and foreign policy.[105]

Other notable Turkish think tanks are the International Strategic Research Organisation (USAK), the Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research (SETA), and the Wise Men Center for Strategic Studies (BİLGESAM).

Public opinion[edit]

A poll by the British firm Cast From Clay found that only 20 percent of Americans trusted think tanks in 2021.[106]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Fang, Lee (15 September 2021). "Intelligence Contract Funneled to Pro-War Think Tank Establishment". The Intercept. Archived from the original on 6 October 2021. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  2. ^ McGann, James G.; Weaver, Robert Kent (1 January 2002). Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action. Transaction Publishers. p. 51. ISBN 978-1-4128-3989-1.
  3. ^ a b c d Fischer, Frank; Miller, Gerald J. (21 December 2006). "Public Policy Analysis and Think Tanks, by Diane Stone". Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. CRC Press. pp. 149–157. ISBN 978-1-4200-1700-7.
  4. ^ a b Selee, Andrew Dan (31 July 2013). What Should Think Tanks Do?: A Strategic Guide to Policy Impact. Stanford University Press. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-8047-8929-5.
  5. ^ a b c d McGann, James. "Think Tanks and the Transnationalization of Foreign Policy". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011.
  6. ^ Roberts, Priscilla (1 December 2015). "A century of international affairs think tanks in historical perspective". International Journal. 70 (4): 535–555. doi:10.1177/0020702015590591. hdl:10722/210910. ISSN 0020-7020. S2CID 155138921.
  7. ^ a b G. McGann, James (22 January 2014). "2013 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report" (PDF). University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 January 2016.
  8. ^ a b G. McGann, James (28 January 2022). "2020 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report". University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on 22 May 2021. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
  9. ^ Soll, Jacob (1 February 2017). "How Think Tanks Became Engines of Royal Propaganda". Tablet Magazine. Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
  10. ^ Pierre-Yves Beaurepaire (2011), La France des Lumières 1715-1789, Paris: Belin, pp. 112–115
  11. ^ Edmund Jan Osmanczyk and Anthony Mango, Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Agreements. London: Routledge, 2004.
  12. ^ Tevi Troy (May–June 2012). "No More Thinking With Think Tanks". Utne. Archived from the original on 26 January 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2013.
  13. ^ Rietbergen, P. J. A. N. (2000). A Short History of the Netherlands: From Prehistory to the Present Day (4th ed.). Amersfoort: Bekking. p. 141. ISBN 90-6109-440-2. OCLC 52849131.
  14. ^ Stone, Diane (2013). Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process. Routledge. p. 9. ISBN 978-1136309045.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h Medvetz, Thomas (2012). Think Tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226517292. Retrieved 28 October 2020.
  16. ^ Fetherling, George (12 May 2008). "In the Tank". The Walrus. Archived from the original on 17 April 2020. Retrieved 6 January 2020.
  17. ^ a b c Singer, Peter (13 August 2010). "Washington's Think Tanks: Factories to Call Our Own". the Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on 21 August 2010.
  18. ^ McGann, James. "The Global "Go-To Think Tanks"" (PDF). the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
  19. ^ Mendizabal, Enrique. "Another year, another ranking of think tanks (and surprise surprise, Brookings is still the best)". On Think Tanks. Archived from the original on 11 March 2023. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
  20. ^ Buldioski, Goran. "Mirror, mirror on the wall... tell me who is the best think tank in the world?". Goran's Musings. Archived from the original on 13 January 2012. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
  21. ^ Lipton, Eric; Williams, Brooke (7 August 2016). "Researchers or Corporate Allies? Think Tanks Blur the Line; Think tanks are seen as independent, but their scholars often push donors' agendas, amplifying a culture of corporate influence in Washington". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2016.
  22. ^ Ong, Elisa K.; Glantz, Stanton A. (2001). "Constructing "Sound Science" and "Good Epidemiology": Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms" (PDF). American Journal of Public Health. 91 (11): 1749–1757. doi:10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1749. PMC 1446868. PMID 11684593. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 April 2003. Retrieved 29 November 2011.
  23. ^ Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber "How Big Tobacco Helped Create 'the Junkman'", Vol. 7, No. 3, PR Watch, Third Quarter 2000, PRWatch.com
  24. ^ "What's in a Label?". FAIR. 22 February 1999. Archived from the original on 8 September 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  25. ^ "The Incredible Shrinking Think Tank". FAIR. 22 February 1999. Archived from the original on 21 September 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  26. ^ "Think Tank Review Project | National Education Policy Center". Nepc.colorado.edu. Archived from the original on 1 November 2011. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  27. ^ Eric Lipton; Brooke Williams; Nicholas Confessore (6 September 2014). "Foreign Powers Buy Influence at Think Tanks". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 5 November 2014. Retrieved 6 December 2014.
  28. ^ "The Think Tank of Quality Education - AMAQUEN Higher Education". AMAQUEN. Archived from the original on 16 June 2021. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
  29. ^ Naji, Abdennasser (1 December 2010). "Rapport sur la qualité du système d'éducation et de formation au Maroc". Researchgate. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
  30. ^ "Nearly half of respondents in study admit to plagiarism". University World News. Archived from the original on 26 October 2022. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
  31. ^ "The Journal of Quality in Education". journal.amaquen.org. Archived from the original on 16 June 2021. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
  32. ^ Naji, Abdennasser. "The main determinants of improving learning outcomes: Analysis of PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS data". Cimqusef. Archived from the original on 16 June 2021. Retrieved 15 June 2021.
  33. ^ Linping, He (18 January 2012). "Nongovernmental think-tank inaugurated in Guangdong". People's Daily Online. Retrieved 30 May 2018.[permanent dead link]
  34. ^ "2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report". Think Tanks and Civil Societies Programs Univ. of Pennsylvania. Lauder Institute, University of Pennsylvania. 31 January 2018. Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 10 March 2018.
  35. ^ "CSE top environment policy think tank in India; 16th in the world: Global Index". Archived from the original on 25 June 2020. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  36. ^ "CPR retains spot as leading India climate think tank for third year in a row | Centre for Policy Research". 21 December 2021. Archived from the original on 25 June 2020. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  37. ^ "About WRI India". WRI INDIA. Archived from the original on 7 July 2020. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  38. ^ "NeGP overview" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 1 March 2011.
  39. ^ "Why think tanks struggle in India". 21 May 2013. Archived from the original on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 13 September 2013.
  40. ^ "MERI - Middle East Research Institute". www.meri-k.org. Archived from the original on 13 February 2018. Retrieved 13 February 2018.
  41. ^ McGann, James G. (2017). "2016 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report". TTCSP Global Go to Think Tank Index Reports. University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on 30 October 2019. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
  42. ^ "Think Tanks in Israel | Jewish Federations of North America". Jewishfederations.org. Archived from the original on 3 February 2012. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  43. ^ "Think tank landscape scan 2022 Korea". A Global Consultancy and Paltform for Change. 18 November 2022.
  44. ^ "Об ИМЭП | Институт мировой экономики и политики". Iwep.kz (in Russian). 17 September 2014. Archived from the original on 13 May 2014. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  45. ^ Bulatkulova, Saniya (19 August 2022). "Central Asian Cooperation: Experts Outline the Benefits and Risks". The Astana Times. Archived from the original on 7 October 2022. Retrieved 7 October 2022.
  46. ^ "Официальный сайт КИСИ при Президенте Республики Казахстан: Краткая информация об Институте". 3 January 2007. Archived from the original on 3 January 2007.
  47. ^ "Jauhar Academy of Social Sciences (JASS) 柔佛社会科学院". Jauhar.my. Archived from the original on 15 March 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  48. ^ "King and People are Inseparable: Proactive Constitutional Monarch in Parliamentary System". 24 November 2020. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 6 May 2021.
  49. ^ Khan, Javed (14 July 2016). "KP continues to increase spending on education". Daily Times. Archived from the original on 12 October 2022. Retrieved 12 October 2022.
  50. ^ "NIRA Review Winter 1999: A Look at Think Tanks in the Philippines by Herman Joseph S. Kraft". Nira.or.jp. Archived from the original on 11 November 2012. Retrieved 14 June 2013.
  51. ^ "Singapore Institute of International Affairs top local think tank: Ranking". Channel NewsAsia. 2 February 2016. Archived from the original on 3 February 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  52. ^ McGann, James G. "2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report". upenn.edu. University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2018.
  53. ^ "Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation launched". Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republic of China (Taiwan). Archived from the original on 6 November 2018. Retrieved 27 September 2018.
  54. ^ "Центр содействия экономическому развитию в Узбекистане". Ced.uz. Archived from the original on 21 September 2011. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  55. ^ Cisar, Ondrej. "Think Tank and Policy Discourses in the Czech Republic". Academia. Archived from the original on 28 December 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
  56. ^ "Prague Security Studies Institute". Pssi.cz. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  57. ^ "Activities". Åland Islands Peace Institute - Ålands fredsinstitut. Archived from the original on 25 March 2013. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
  58. ^ "Demos Helsinki". onthinktanks.org. On Think Tanks. Archived from the original on 4 September 2021. Retrieved 4 September 2021.
  59. ^ Standish, Reid (18 January 2018). "Inside a European Center to Combat Russia's Hybrid Warfare". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 18 January 2018. Retrieved 22 January 2018. Located in an unassuming office building filled with boardrooms, lecture halls, and projectors in the Finnish capital, a new entity under the joint auspices of the European Union and NATO was founded with a herculean mission. [...] In this vein, the hybrid center is more of an in-house think tank than a task force dedicated to debunking propaganda or tracking hackers in cyberspace.
  60. ^ "Crisis Management Initiative (CMI)". Institute for NGO Research. 23 January 2017. Archived from the original on 24 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
  61. ^ "Activities in a nutshell: Research, forecasting and policy assessment". Etla. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
  62. ^ "Introduction". FIIA – The Finnish Institute of International Affairs. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 22 February 2018. The Finnish Institute of International Affairs is a research institute whose mission is to produce high quality, topical information on international relations and the EU.
  63. ^ Tamminen, Jenni (28 October 2012). "Perussuomalaiset aloitti jättiselvityksen". Uusi Suomi. Archived from the original on 14 May 2021. Retrieved 14 May 2021.
  64. ^ "Fondation Concorde". Fondation Concorde. Archived from the original on 29 July 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  65. ^ James G. McGann. "2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report" (PDF). Repository.upenn.edu. Archived from the original on 7 May 2021. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  66. ^ "Home". Liia.lv. Archived from the original on 8 February 2013. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  67. ^ "providus.lv". providus.lv. Archived from the original on 24 July 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  68. ^ "Centre for European and Transition Studies – University of Latvia". Lu.lv. Archived from the original on 20 August 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  69. ^ "Latvijas Nacionālā aizsardzības akadēmija". 5 November 2013. Archived from the original on 5 November 2013. Retrieved 19 February 2018.
  70. ^ "vilniusinstitute.lt". vilniusinstitute.lt. Archived from the original on 14 November 2020. Retrieved 14 November 2020.
  71. ^ "O nadácií – Nadácia Antona Tunegu" (in Slovak). Archived from the original on 1 November 2022. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
  72. ^ "About Chatham House". Chatham House. Archived from the original on 8 May 2020. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
  73. ^ "avenir suisse | think tank for economic and social issues". Avenir-suisse.ch. Archived from the original on 22 July 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  74. ^ McGann, James (2017). "2016 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report". TTCSP Global Go to Think Tank Index Reports. TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 12. (12). University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on 6 June 2017. Retrieved 22 February 2018.
  75. ^ "GDI – Geschichte". Gdi.ch. Archived from the original on 28 August 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  76. ^ "twitter". Libinst.ch. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  77. ^ Eaton, George (18 May 2018). "Onward – the Tory think tank on a mission to remake conservatism". New Statesman. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  78. ^ "Who are Australia's major think tanks?". www.govconnex.com. Retrieved 23 November 2023.
  79. ^ "AIMS - Atlantic Institute for Market Studies". 7 August 2010. Archived from the original on 7 August 2010. Retrieved 19 February 2018.
  80. ^ "Canada West Foundation |". Cwf.ca. Archived from the original on 21 October 2011. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  81. ^ "Cardus". Cardus.ca. Archived from the original on 10 August 2019. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  82. ^ "Frontier Centre For Public Policy". Frontier Centre For Public Policy. Archived from the original on 12 May 2022. Retrieved 11 May 2022.
  83. ^ "Institute on Governance – Leading Expertise". Institute on Governance. Archived from the original on 11 September 2014. Retrieved 18 August 2014.
  84. ^ "Parkland Institute :: Research and Education for the Common Good :: Edmonton, Alberta". Parklandinstitute.ca. Archived from the original on 28 July 2016. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  85. ^ a b Thomas Medvetz, "'Think Tanks in America" (2012) Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
  86. ^ "About Us". Tax Foundation. Archived from the original on 14 April 2015. Retrieved 14 April 2015.
  87. ^ "Scoop: Pompeo to stay in DC and join Hudson Institute - Axios". Archived from the original on 8 November 2021. Retrieved 8 November 2021.
  88. ^ Wallstein, Peter (19 January 2012). "Center for American Progress, group tied to Obama, under fire from Israel advocates". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 21 December 2013. Retrieved 26 February 2014.
  89. ^ Cohen, Rick (12 December 2014). "The Inner Workings of Think Tanks: Transparify Gives Us a Good Look". Nonprofit Quarterly. Archived from the original on 16 December 2014. Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  90. ^ "The Incredible Shrinking Think Tank". FAIR. 1 March 2008. Archived from the original on 18 April 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  91. ^ a b Lipton, Eric; Williams, Brooke (7 August 2016). "Researchers or Corporate Allies? Think Tanks Blur the Line". New York Times. Retrieved 9 August 2016.
  92. ^ "Search Page". 18 November 2002. Archived from the original on 18 November 2002. Retrieved 19 February 2018.
  93. ^ Mendizabal Enrique (2009). "Think tanks and political parties in Latin America, Background Paper" (PDF). Odi.org.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 October 2010. Retrieved 29 July 2016.
  94. ^ Mendizabal, Enrique y Kristen Sample (eds) (2009) Dime a quien escuchas... Think Tanks y Partidos Politicos en America Latina, ODI/IDEA: Lima
  95. ^ ""Think Tanks as an Emergent Field" — Publication — Social Science Research Council". Ssrc.org. Archived from the original on 25 June 2010. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  96. ^ "on the business model and how this affects what think tanks do « on think tanks". Onthinktanks.wordpress.com. Archived from the original on 7 November 2010. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  97. ^ "NIRA's World Directory of Think Tanks 2002: Introduction". 2 May 2006. Archived from the original on 2 May 2006. Retrieved 19 February 2018.
  98. ^ "Foreign Policy, January/February, 2009". Foreignpolicy.com. Archived from the original on 7 January 2010. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
  99. ^ "Argentina, quinto país en el mundo en centros de estudio". Clarin.com. 25 January 2009. Archived from the original on 31 March 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  100. ^ McGann, James. "The Global "Go-To Think Tanks"" (PDF). the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 October 2011.
  101. ^ "About Igarapé". Igarapé Institute. Archived from the original on 25 January 2022. Retrieved 25 January 2022.
  102. ^ McGann, James G (2020). "2020 Global Go To Think Tanks Index Report". University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons. Archived from the original on 22 May 2021. Retrieved 28 September 2022.
  103. ^ Vardan Atoyan, Armenian Think Tanks Are Facing Old and New Challenges Archived 3 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine, SSRN Electronic Journal (July 2022).
  104. ^ The Global Go To Think Tanks Report 2011 (PDF) (Report). University of Pennsylvania. 18 January 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 March 2012. Retrieved 19 February 2018 – via Foreign Policy Research Institute.
  105. ^ "TESEV Türkiye Ekonomik ve Sosyal Etüdler Vakfı". 25 April 2001. Archived from the original on 25 April 2001. Retrieved 19 February 2018.
  106. ^ Rojansky, Matthew; Shapiro, Jeremy (28 May 2021). "Why Everyone Hates Think Tanks". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 28 September 2022. Retrieved 28 September 2022.

Further reading[edit]