Same-Sex Marriage Legislation in the United States
The legislation on same-sex marriage in the United States is at the level of individual states regulated.
At the state level
In 1996, the United States Congress approved the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which was signed by President Bill Clinton . The act defines the terms “marriage” and “spouse” and thus prohibits same-sex marriages at the state level. The reason for the ban was a bill legalizing same-sex marriages that was being debated in the Hawaiian Senate at the time. It was feared that if gay marriages were approved (but not approved), same-sex couples would travel to Hawaii to get married, and so the federal or state would have to recognize these marriages. The Defense of Marriage Act allows same-sex couples who have previously married in a state that recognizes same-sex marriage cannot have their marriage recognized in another state that does not issue these types of licenses. Opponents of the Defense of Marriage Act specifically point out that this law allows couples who For example, if you married in Massachusetts, you can benefit from the 1,138 laws and benefits that the United States makes available to heterosexual spouses.
The DOMA challenge was decided by the Supreme Court in Washington on June 26, 2013 in favor of same-sex couples. In future, married same-sex couples will be treated equally at the federal level.
Since February 2014, homosexual couples who go to the registry office have been given further rights at the federal level across the country, including the same rights in the case of personal bankruptcies, widows' pensions, the right to refuse to testify in federal courts, or the right to visit federal prisons.
At national level
From the 1990s onwards, same-sex marriages became a political issue. Coastal states in particular legalized unregistered partnerships, but also limited registered partnerships. The Massachusetts court order made the New England state the first state in the United States to legalize same-sex marriage. However, there were mainly states in the south and in the interior of the United States that changed the constitution to prohibit marriage for same-sex couples.
On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court declared same-sex marriage permissible in all states.
Efforts to legalize same-sex marriages and partnerships
State | date | Art | senate | Chamber of Deputies | governor | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Yes | No | |||||
District of Columbia | June 1992 | Unregistered partnerships | approved | signed | Yes | |||
Vermont | April 1994 | Reciprocal Beneficiary Relationship | 27 | 14th | 87 | 42 | signed | Yes |
California | September 1994 | Unregistered partnerships | 21st | 17th | 41 | 26th | veto | No |
Hawaii | March 1996 | Unregistered partnerships | 14th | 11 | failed | - | No | |
Hawaii | June 1997 | Reciprocal Beneficiary Relationship | 24 | 7th | 43 | 27 | signed | Yes |
California | September 1999 | Unregistered partnerships | 22nd | 14th | 41 | 36 | signed | Yes |
Vermont | April 2000 | Registered partnerships | 19th | 11 | 79 | 68 | signed | Yes |
California | October 2001 | Registered partnerships | 23 | 11 | 41 | 32 | signed | Yes |
California | September 2003 | Registered partnerships (expansion) | 23 | 14th | 41 | 33 | signed | Yes |
New Jersey | January 2004 | Unregistered partnerships | 23 | 9 | 41 | 28 | signed | Yes |
Maine | April 2004 | Unregistered partnerships | 19th | 14th | 84 | 58 | signed | Yes |
Utah | February 2005 | Reciprocal Beneficiary Relationship | 10 | 18th | - | - | - | No |
Connecticut | April 2005 | Registered partnerships | 27 | 9 | 85 | 63 | signed | Yes |
Maryland | May 2005 | Unregistered partnerships | 31 | 16 | 83 | 50 | veto | No |
California | June 2005 | Same-sex marriage | - | - | 37 | 36 | - | No |
Oregon | July 2005 | Registered partnerships | 19th | 10 | - | - | - | No |
California | September 2005 | Same-sex marriage | 21st | 15th | 41 | 35 | veto | No |
District of Columbia | April 2006 | Registered partnerships | approved | signed | Yes | |||
Colorado | November 2006 | Registered partnerships | Referendum (47% to 53%) | No | ||||
New Jersey | December 2006 | Registered partnerships | 23 | 12 | 56 | 19th | signed | Yes |
Washington | April 2007 | Registered partnerships | 28 | 19th | 63 | 35 | signed | Yes |
Oregon | May 2007 | Registered partnerships | 21st | 9 | 34 | 26th | signed | Yes |
New Hampshire | May 2007 | Registered partnerships | 14th | 10 | 243 | 129 | signed | Yes |
new York | June 2007 | Same-sex marriage | - | - | 85 | 61 | - | No |
California | September 2007 | Same-sex marriage | 22nd | 15th | 42 | 34 | veto | No |
New Mexico | January 2008 | Registered partnerships | - | - | 33 | 31 | - | No |
Washington | March 2008 | Registered partnerships (expansion) | 29 | 20th | 62 | 32 | signed | Yes |
Maryland | May 2008 | Unregistered partnerships | 39 | 19th | 44 | 39 | signed | Yes |
District of Columbia | May 2008 | Registered partnerships (expansion) | approved | signed | Yes | |||
New Mexico | February 2009 | Registered partnerships | 17th | 25th | - | - | - | No |
Vermont | April 2009 | Same-sex marriage | 23 | 5 | 100 | 49 | veto | Veto lifted |
Montana | April 2009 | Unregistered partnerships | - | - | failed | - | No | |
Colorado | April 2009 | Designated Beneficiary Relationship | 23 | 10 | 41 | 24 | signed | Yes |
Connecticut | April 2009 | Same-sex marriage | 28 | 7th | 100 | 44 | signed | Yes |
Maine | May 2009 | Same-sex marriage | 21st | 14th | 89 | 58 | signed | stopped in referendum until 2012 Yes (allowed in another referdenum from 2012) |
District of Columbia | May 2009 | Same-sex marriage (recognition only) | approved | signed | Yes | |||
Washington | May 2009 | Registered partnerships (expansion) | 30th | 18th | 62 | 35 | signed | Yes |
Nevada | May 2009 | Registered partnerships | 14th | 7th | 28 | 14th | veto | Veto lifted |
New Hampshire | June 2009 | Same-sex marriage | 14th | 10 | 198 | 176 | signed | Yes |
Wisconsin | June 2009 | Unregistered partnerships | 17th | 16 | 50 | 48 | signed | Yes |
California | October 2009 | Recognition of foreign and pre- Proposition 8 marriages | 24 | 14th | 44 | 27 | signed | Yes |
new York | December 2009 | Same-sex marriage | 24 | 38 | 89 | 52 | - | No |
District of Columbia | December 2009 | Same-sex marriage | n / A | 11 | 2 | signed | Yes | |
Rhode Island | January 2010 | Unregistered partnerships | 31 | 3 | 67 | 3 | veto | Veto lifted |
New Jersey | January 2010 | Same-sex marriage | 14th | 20th | - | - | - | No |
Minnesota | May 2010 | Unregistered partnerships | 41 | 24 | 78 | 55 | signed | Yes |
Hawaii | July 2010 | Registered partnerships | 18th | 7th | 31 | 20th | veto | No |
new York | July 2010 | Unregistered partnerships | 50 | 11 | 127 | 26th | signed | Yes |
Illinois | January 2011 | Registered partnerships | 32 | 24 | 61 | 52 | signed | Yes |
Hawaii | February 2011 | Registered partnerships | 18th | 5 | 31 | 19th | signed | Yes |
Colorado | March 2011 | Registered partnerships | 23 | 12 | - | - | - | No |
Washington | April 2011 | Recognition of foreign marriages as registered partnerships | 28 | 19th | 58 | 39 | signed | Yes |
Delaware | May 2011 | Registered partnerships | 13 | 6th | 26th | 15th | signed | Yes |
new York | June 2011 | Same-sex marriage | 33 | 29 | 80 | 63 | signed | Yes |
Rhode Island | June 2011 | Registered partnerships | 62 | 11 | 21st | 16 | signed | Yes |
California | June 2011 | Registered partnerships (expansion) | 24 | 15th | floating | ... | ||
New Jersey | 2012 | Same-sex marriage | ... | ... | floating | veto | No | |
Washington | February 2012 | Same-sex marriage | signed | Yes | ||||
Maryland | February 2012 | Same-sex marriage | signed | Yes | ||||
Colorado | March 2013 | Registered partnerships | signed | Yes | ||||
Rhode Island | January 2013 | Same-sex marriage | 26th | 12 | 51 | 19th | signed | Yes |
Delaware | April 2013 | Same-sex marriage | 12 | 9 | signed | Yes | ||
Minnesota | May 2013 | Same-sex marriage | 37 | 30th | 75 | 59 | signed | Yes |
Illinois | November 2013 | Same-sex marriage | 32 | 21st | 61 | 54 | signed | Yes |
Hawaii | November 2013 | Same-sex marriage | 20th | 04 | 30th | 19th | signed | Yes |
Delaware | May 2013 | marriage | 12 | 9 | 23 | 18th | signed | Yes |
Minnesota | May 2013 | marriage | 37 | 30th | 75 | 59 | signed | Yes |
Illinois | November 2013 | marriage | 32 | 21st | 61 | 54 | signed | Yes |
Wyoming | February 2014 | marriage | 17th | 41 | No |
Efforts to ban same-sex partnerships through constitutional amendments
State | Prohibition of | date | Yes | No | Result | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1998: | ||||||
Alaska | Same-sex marriage | November 1998 | 68% (152,965) | 32% (71,631) | Yes | |
Hawaii | Same-sex marriage | November 1998 | 69% (285,384) | 31% (117,827) | Yes | |
2000: | ||||||
Nebraska | All forms | November 2000 | 70% (450,073) | 30% (189,555) | Yes | |
2002: | ||||||
Nevada | Same-sex marriage | November 2002 | 67% (337,183) | 33% (164,555) | Yes | |
2004: | ||||||
Arkansas | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2004 | 75% (753,770) | 25% (251,914) | Yes | |
Georgia | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2004 | 76% (2,454,912) | 24% (768,703) | Yes | |
Kentucky | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2004 | 75% (1,222,125) | 25% (417,097) | Yes | |
Louisiana | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | September 2004 | 78% (618,928) | 22% (177,103) | Yes | |
Michigan | All forms | November 2004 | 59% (2,698,077) | 41% (1,904,319) | Yes | |
Mississippi | Same-sex marriage | November 2004 | 86% (957,104) | 14% (155,648) | Yes | |
Missouri | Same-sex marriage | August 2004 | 71% (1,055,771) | 29% (439,529) | Yes | |
Montana | Same-sex marriage | November 2004 | 67% (295,070) | 33% (148,263) | Yes | |
North Dakota | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2004 | 73% (223,572) | 27% (81,716) | Yes | |
Ohio | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2004 | 62% (3,329,335) | 38% (2,065,462) | Yes | |
Oklahoma | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2004 | 76% (1,075,216) | 24% (347,303) | Yes | |
Oregon | Same-sex marriage | November 2004 | 57% (1,028,546) | 43% (787,556) | Yes | |
Utah | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2004 | 66% (593,297) | 34% (307,488) | Yes | |
2005: | ||||||
Kansas | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | April 2005 | 70% (414,106) | 30% (178,018) | Yes | |
Texas | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2005 | 76% (1,718,513) | 24% (536,052) | Yes | |
2006: | ||||||
Alabama | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | June 2006 | 81% (734,746) | 19% (170,399) | Yes | |
Arizona | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2006 | 48% (721,489) | 52% (775,498) | No | |
Colorado | Same-sex marriage | November 2006 | 56% (768,700) | 44% (612,155) | Yes | |
Idaho | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2006 | 63% (281,823) | 37% (163,191) | Yes | |
South carolina | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2006 | 78% (818,894) | 22% (230,674) | Yes | |
South Dakota | All forms | November 2006 | 52% (172,237) | 48% (160,756) | Yes | |
Tennessee | Same-sex marriage | November 2006 | 81% (1,417,315) | 19% (326,335) | Yes | |
Virginia | All forms | November 2006 | 57% (1,325,668) | 43% (1,003,967) | Yes | |
Wisconsin | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2006 | 59% (1,260,554) | 41% (861,554) | Yes | |
2008: | ||||||
Arizona | Same-sex marriage | November 2008 | 56% (1,258,355) | 44% (980,753) | Yes | |
California | Same-sex marriage | November 2008 | 52% (7,001,084) | 48% (6,401,482) | Yes | |
Florida | Same-sex marriage and registered partnerships | November 2008 | 62% (4,890,883) | 38% (3,008,026) | Yes | |
2012: | ||||||
Minnesota | Same-sex marriage | November 2012 | ... | ... | No |
Referendums to amend the code to allow or forbid same-sex partnerships
State | date | Yes | No | Explanation | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | March 2000 | 61% (4,618,673) | 39% (2,909,370) | Modification of family law by: Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. | Yes; unconstitutional |
Colorado | November 2006 | 47% (641,443) | 53% (727,433) | Creation of registered partnerships for same-sex couples. | No |
Maine | November 2009 | 53% (299,021) | 47% (265,076) | In November 2009, Maine voters were asked to vote on same-sex marriage. | No |
Washington | November 2009 | 53.2% (950,000) | 46.8% (804,032) | Washington citizens had to vote on expanding registered partnerships to give them the same rights as heterosexual couples. | Yes |
Judicial decisions to create same-sex partnerships / marriages
State | date | Vote for it | Votes against | Explanation | Result | led to |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minnesota | October 1971 | 0 | 7th | The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the prohibition of same-sex marriage in the law is not unconstitutional. | No | - |
Hawaii | December 1997 | 3 | 2 | A court ruled that the code's prohibition on same-sex marriages was inconsistent with the constitutional non-discrimination clause, but was later overturned in a referendum. | by referendum | |
Vermont | December 1999 | 5 | 0 | Same-sex marriages or similar must be created within 100 days. | Yes | Registered partnerships |
Massachusetts | November 2003 | 4th | 3 | The Supreme Court ordered same-sex marriages to be established within 180 days. | Yes | marriage |
new York | July 2006 | 2 | 4th | The Supreme Court ruled that the prohibition of same-sex marriages in the law is not unconstitutional. | No | - |
Washington | July 2006 | 4th | 5 | The Supreme Court ruled that the prohibition of same-sex marriages in the law is not unconstitutional. | No | - |
New Jersey | October 2006 | 4th | 3 | Same-sex marriages or the like must be introduced within 100 days. | Yes | Registered partnerships |
Maryland | September 2007 | 3 | 4th | The Supreme Court ruled that the prohibition of same-sex marriages in the law is not unconstitutional. | No | - |
California | May 2008 | 4th | 3 | Same-sex marriage must be introduced within 30 days. | Yes | referendum |
Connecticut | October 2008 | 4th | 3 | Same-sex marriages must be introduced within 30 days. | Yes | marriage |
Iowa | April 2009 | 7th | 0 | Same-sex marriages must be introduced within 27 days. | Yes | marriage |
California | May 2009 | 1 | 6th | The California Supreme Court ruled that Proposition 8 will be upheld. This decision was declared null and void in the first instance before a federal court in August 2010 because it was incompatible with the federal constitution, but this will only become final after the appeal bodies have been exhausted. | No | - |
new York | October 2009 | 3 | 2 | It was decided that New York State should maintain recognition of foreign same-sex marriages. | ||
Wisconsin | June 2010 | 0 | 7th | The Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage ban would be upheld. | ||
Texas | September 2010 | failed | A Texas court ruled that the ban on same-sex marriages was in violation of the American Constitution and handed the hearing to the Texas Court of Appeal, which ruled that the ban could be upheld as it was not unconstitutional. | |||
Minnesota | March 2011 | failed | The court ruled that the ban on same-sex marriages would be upheld. | |||
New Jersey | October 2013 | The court ruled that the judicial opening of the marriage would be maintained. | Yes | marriage | ||
New Mexico | December 2013 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. | Yes | marriage | ||
Utah | December 2013 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. | Yes | marriage | ||
Oregon | May 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Pennsylvania | May 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Colorado | July 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Virginia | July 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
West Virginia | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Oklahoma | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
North Carolina | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Wisconsin | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Indiana | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Nevada | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Idaho | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Arizona | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Alaska | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Wyoming | October 2014 | The court ruled that the state of Wyoming will open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Missouri | November 2014 | The court ruled that the state would open marriage. The verdict has not been temporarily suspended. | Yes | marriage | ||
Kansas | November 2014 | The Washington DC Supreme Court ruled Kansas for homosexual equality in marriage law. | Yes | marriage | ||
Montana | November 2014 | The Washington DC Supreme Court ruled Montana for equality for homosexuals in marriage law. | Yes | marriage | ||
South carolina | November 2014 | The Washington DC Supreme Court ruled South Carolina for homosexual equality in marriage law. | Yes | marriage | ||
Florida | January 2015 | The Florida court ruled homosexual equality in marriage law. | Yes | marriage | ||
Alabama | February 2015 | The Alabama court ruled homosexual equality in marriage law. | Yes | marriage |
See also
- Same-sex marriage legislation
- Registered partnership
- Same-sex marriage
- Laws on homosexuality
- Rainbow family
Web links
Individual evidence
- ↑ zeit.de: Lesbians and gays achieve victory in the Supreme Court
- ^ Advocate: Fed-Extending numerous rights same-sex spouses couples
- ↑ zeit.de:USA-Homo-Ehe,US-Justizminister equals homosexual couples in court at the federal level
- ^ Zeit Online: Highest US court declares gay marriage nationwide
- ^ Senate OKs Bill on Rights for Unwed Couples. PQSAB , accessed September 9, 2009 .
- ^ Wilson: no to domestic partnership bill. Newsbank , September 12, 1994, accessed September 9, 2009 .
- ↑ Gay marriages get thumps up in state senate. Google News , March 6, 1996, accessed September 9, 2009 .
- ↑ Wendy Cloyd: New Jersey Legislature Adopts Civil Unions. Citizen Link , December 15, 2006, accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ^ Washington State Passes Domestic Partnership Bill. (No longer available online.) US Politics , April 12, 2007, formerly original ; Retrieved November 4, 2009 . ( Page no longer available , search in web archives ) Info: The link was automatically marked as defective. Please check the link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ^ Roberta Sklar: Task Force hails Oregon Senate passage of domestic partnership legislation covering same-sex couples. (No longer available online.) The Task Force , May 2, 2007, archived from the original on November 4, 2009 ; Retrieved November 4, 2009 . Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ^ New York governor to propose legalizing same-sex marriage. CNN , April 14, 2009, accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ^ Roberta Sklar: Task Force Action Fund denounces New Mexico Senate's rejection of comprehensive domestic partnership bill. (No longer available online.) The Task Force , February 21, 2008, archived from the original on November 6, 2009 ; Retrieved November 4, 2009 . Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ^ Brad Luna: WA domestic partnership expansion bill signed into law. Free Press , March 13, 2008, accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ^ MV Jantzen: DC Council Passes Domestic Partner Law Expansion. (No longer available online.) DCist May 16, 2008, archived from the original on February 19, 2010 ; Retrieved November 4, 2009 . Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ↑ Steven Terrell: Domestic partnership bill fails in Senate. (No longer available online.) Santa Fe New Mexican , Feb. 26, 2009, archived from the original on May 23, 2011 ; Retrieved November 4, 2009 . Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ↑ David Abel: Vermont legalizes same-sex marriage. The Boston Globe , April 8, 2009, accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ^ Lauren Russell: Equality in Montana should be a right. (No longer available online.) Montana Kaimin , April 9, 2009, formerly the original ; Retrieved September 9, 2009 . ( Page no longer available , search in web archives ) Info: The link was automatically marked as defective. Please check the link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ↑ Chase Matthews: Connecticut Gov. signs gay marriage into law. Chicago Pride , April 23, 2009, accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ↑ Abby Goodnough: Gay Marriage Advances in Maine. New York Times , May 5, 2009, accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ↑ Portland Press Herold: Mainers vote down gay marriage law . ( Memento of the original from November 7th, 2009 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was automatically inserted and not yet checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. November 4, 2009.
- ↑ Tim Craig: Uproar in DC as Same-Sex Marriage Gains. Washington Post , May 5, 2009, accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ↑ Washington Expands Domestic Partnerships, Offers Almost-Marriage. (No longer available online.) Family Fairness , April 16, 2009, archived from the original on February 12, 2011 ; Retrieved November 4, 2009 . Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ↑ Nevada legalizing domestic partnerships. CNN , May 31, 2009, accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ↑ Norma Love: Gay Marriage: New Hampshire Makes Same-Sex Marriage Legal. Huffington Post , June 3, 2009, accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ↑ Jim Burroway: Wisconsin Senate Approves Domestic Partnerships. Box Turtle Bulletin , June 17, 2009; accessed November 4, 2009 .
- ↑ States Assembly approves law clarifying rights of same-sex couples married outside of California. (No longer available online.) Out in Hollywood , formerly the original ; Retrieved September 9, 2009 . ( Page no longer available , search in web archives ) Info: The link was automatically marked as defective. Please check the link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ↑ 20min.ch:No gay marriage in New York
- ↑ RttNews: Washington, DC Mayor Signs Law Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage
- ↑ CBSNews:
- ↑ New York Times:
- ↑ OnTop: Citing Marriage, Tim Pawlenty Rejects Gay Rights Bill
- ↑ Honolulu Advertiser: Hawaii Senate debates civil unions bill ( Memento of the original from March 24, 2012 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ^ Advocate: Funeral leave bill passes Ny senate
- ↑ Chicago Pride: Illinois House passes civil unions legislation in historic vote
- ↑ OnTop: Illinois Senate OK's Civil Unions For Gay & Lesbian Couples
- ↑ Civil Unions Legalized in Illinois ( page no longer available , search in web archives ) Info: The link was automatically marked as defective. Please check the link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ^ Hawaii State Legislature 2011 Regular Session SB232 SD1
- ↑ Advocate: Colorado Senate Passes Civil Unions Bill ( Memento of the original from July 20, 2012 in the web archive archive.today ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ↑ DenverPost: House panel kills Colorado civil unions bill on 6-5 party-line vote
- ↑ apps.leg.wa.gov
- ^ WashingtonBlade: 2011 to bring new marriage fights across US
- ^ Advocate: Delaware Senate passes civil unions bill
- ^ Advocate: Delaware house to vote on civil unions
- ↑ Cuomo Will Make Gay Marriage a "Priority"
- ↑ Andrew Cuomo Pledges Gay Marriage 'Priority'
- ↑ Advocate: RI House Passes Civil Unions Bill ( Memento of the original from May 25, 2011 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ↑ Equality California: Legislation to Close Gap between Marriage and Domestic Partnership Advances ( Memento of the original dated August 3, 2011 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ↑ Equality California: Domestic Partnership Equality Act ( Memento of the original dated December 10, 2013 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ↑ North Jersey: Lawmaker introduces bill for gay marriage
- ^ Senate approves gay marriage; House passage not assured
- ^ Maryland Governor to sign gay marriage legislation on March 1, 2012
- ^ Advocate: Victorious Step in Long Fight
- ↑ advocate.com:Rhode Island marriage equality bill be introduced Thursday
- ↑ advocate.com:Delaware House to Vote on Same-Sex Marriage Bill
- ^ New York Times: Delaware Becomes the 11th State to Allow Same-Sex Marriage
- ^ Minnesota, CBS: Sen. Dibble Plans To Introduce Gay Marriage Bill This Week
- ^ Advocate: Minnesota Gov. Signs Marriage Equality Into Law
- ^ Advocate.com:Ill. Lawmakers May Consider Marriage Equality Bill Wednesday
- ↑ Advocate.com : Hawaii consider Marriage Equality
- ↑ Advocate.com: Hawaii passes Marriage Equality
- ↑ queer.de:Hawaii opens marriage
- ^ Status of House Bill 75
- ^ Bill Status for HF 1054 .
- ↑ Bill Status of SB10
- ^ Ray Long: Illinois Senate approves gay marriage - chicagotribune.com . In: Chicago Tribune , February 14, 2013.
- ↑ Wyoming House defeats bill aimed at legalizing same-sex marriages
- ↑ Full Results ( Memento of the original from October 11, 2009 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice.
- ^ Colorado Referendum I full results. CNN, accessed October 4, 2009 .
- ↑ February 1781167.html WCO: gay marriage ban pro
- ↑ nujournal.com
- ↑ queer.de: New Jersey: Marriage opening comes into force
- ^ Advocate.com: New Mexico Supreme Court declares statewide marriage
- ↑ Advocate.com:Feral Appeals court wont stop Utah marriages
- ↑ queer.de:Oregon opens marriage for same-sex couples
- ↑ queer.de:Pennsylvania opens marriage to same-sex couples
- ↑ queer.de : Also the marriage ban in Colorado is unconstitutional
- ↑ queer.de : Again victory, marriage ban in Virginia unconstitutional
- ^ Advocate: West Va. Won't Fight Marriage Equality
- ↑ a b c Queer.de: lawsuits dismissed, USA: five other states must open marriage
- ^ Advocate: BREAKING: North Carolina Now Has Marriage Equality
- ^ Advocate: WATCH: Nev. Sen. Proposes on Live TV, But When Can He Marry?
- ^ Advocate: Idaho, Couples can marry wednesday
- ^ Advocate: Arizona Now Has Marriage Equality
- ^ Advocate: Alaska marriage ban struck down
- ^ Advocate: Federal Judge Strikes Down Wyoming's Marriage Ban
- ↑ Queer.de : Judgment, St. Louis opens marriage
- ↑ Queer.de:Siege for marriage opening in Kansas and South Carolina
- ↑ Queer.de:Montana also has to open marriage
- ^ New York Times: Supreme Court Allows Same-Sex Marriages to Proceed in South Carolina
- ↑ Queer.de: Florida in marriage fever
- ↑ GGG.at:Alabama: First homosexual marriages, Supreme Court rejected the state with a request for postponement