Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Articles created/expanded on July 19: first used and first coined
Line 72: Line 72:
== Candidate entries ==
== Candidate entries ==
===Articles created/expanded on July 20===
===Articles created/expanded on July 20===
*...that [[All Blacks|New Zealand]] has only lost four [[Test match (rugby union)|Test matches]] at '''[[List of All Black Tests at Carisbrook|Carisbrook]]''' stadium in over one hundred years? (self-nom) - [[User:Shudde|<font color="Blue">'''Shudde'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Shudde|'''<font color="Blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> 13:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
*...that [[Samuel Johnson]] bragged that he could recite an entire chapter of Niels Horrebow's '''''[[Natural History of Iceland]]'''''? (self-nom) [[User: Zagalejo|Zagalejo]]'''[[User talk:Zagalejo|^^^]]''' 08:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
*...that [[Samuel Johnson]] bragged that he could recite an entire chapter of Niels Horrebow's '''''[[Natural History of Iceland]]'''''? (self-nom) [[User: Zagalejo|Zagalejo]]'''[[User talk:Zagalejo|^^^]]''' 08:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
*...that the '''[[List of wards in Plymouth|wards in Plymouth]]''' will have a new constituency in the [[Next United Kingdom general election|nest general election]]? (self-nominated) [[User:Bsrboy|bsrboy]] ([[User talk:Bsrboy|talk]]) 12:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
*...that the '''[[List of wards in Plymouth|wards in Plymouth]]''' will have a new constituency in the [[Next United Kingdom general election|nest general election]]? (self-nominated) [[User:Bsrboy|bsrboy]] ([[User talk:Bsrboy|talk]]) 12:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:26, 20 July 2008

2nd-century BC fortified gate at Horvat 'Eqed
2nd-century BC fortified gate at Horvat 'Eqed

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old; for details see these rules.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or expanded (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose number of characters have been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|May 21}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

2024-05-21T00:00:00Z

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on July 20

Articles created/expanded on July 19

  • ... that an obelisk at Mamhead (pictured) was built in the 1740s for "the safety of such as might use to sail out of the Port of Exon or any others who might be driven on the coast"? - self-nom by Xn4 (talk) 19:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That last one, in Tappahannock, could use some expansion, so I'm going to try and beef it up a little bit before this can go live. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 19:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dubious - the word goes back to 1826 according to Oxford English Dictionary. PamD (talk) 10:52, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to this reference On his death in 1843 one newspaper coined the word "millionaire" - which had never been used.
  • According to this reference The term "millionaire" was not coined until he died in 1843. At the time, an obituary writer, plagued by a deadline, minted the phrase and it passed into the language.
  • According to this reference The word "millionaire" in fact was coined only in 1843, when, upon the death of Peter Lorillard (snuff, banking, real estate) the newspapers needed a term to denote great affluence.
  • According to this reference The word "milionaire", in fact, was coined only in 1843, when upon the death of Peter Lorillard (snuff, banking, real estate) the newspapers needed a term to denote great affluence.
  • According to this reference Thus, when Pierre Lorillard, a New York snuff maker, banker, and landholder, died in 1843, his fortune of $1,000,000 or so, was considered so unusual that the word "millionaire", newly-coined, was initialized in the rounds of the press.
  • According to this reference The word "millionaire" was coined in 1843 by a newspaper reporter in an obituary of Pierre Lorillard, banker, landlord, and tobacconist.
  • According to this reference The word "millionaire" was first used. The term was included in a French newspaper obituary for Pierre Lorillard, a wealthy businessman who made his fortune selling tobacco and snuff.
  • According to Wecter, Dixon, The Saga of American Society: A Record of Social Aspiration, 1607-1937, page 113: ... death of Pierre Lorillard, snuff- and cigar-maker, the newspapers coined the word millionaire to denote such affluence.
  • According to this reference At the death of Pierre IV's grandfather in 1843, the term "millionaire" was first coined for his obituary.
--Doug talk 12:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • But according to the Oxford English Dictionary (I'm accessing it online through my local public library's subscription, but it's available in print too), their first two cited usages are: "1816 BYRON Let. 23 June (1976) V. 80 He is still worth at least 50-000 pds{em}being what is called here [sc. Evian] a ‘Millionaire’ that is in Francs & such Lilliputian coinage. 1826 B. DISRAELI Vivian Grey I. ix, Were I the son of a Millionaire, or a noble, I might have all." I believe OED, though someone may well have independently re-invented the word across the other side of the big pond. PamD (talk) 13:06, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
None of those sources say anything about "re-inventing" or the "re-use" of the word - they all say "first usage" and "first coined" or "minted the phrase" - and that it was first used in a French obituary. --Doug talk 13:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Article has 840 characters. (tables, templates, lists, etc. are not counted) Thingg 16:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are some interesting choices, so here are some other possibilities:
  • Could you please specify what your concern is? The numbers are cited and go back to a U.S. Federal grand jury investigation. As to the nickname, it was already in common use by the end of the 1885 session as shown by Selim M. Franklin's quotation. --Allen3 talk 08:28, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Article is 1295 characters. Templates, tables, quotes, etc. are not counted. Thingg 16:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article text is now 1875 chars. Perhaps you checked it quite a while ago. It has been extended to comply with the minimum length. ww2censor (talk) 16:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, actually the difference is because Thingg specified that "quotes, etc. are not counted", and the 1875 figure includes 2 quotes. The rules don't explicitly exclude such quotes from the definition of prose only, but I think I've seen that exclusion before, so I added the quotes exclusion to my Unwritten Rules. Art LaPella (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, now it really is long enough at 1858 characters, not including quotes, etc., per the guidelines. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 04:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 18

  • ... that 209 people were killed and 41,000 houses were damaged or totally destroyed in the 1970 floods in Romania, with over a million arable acres inundated, and more than 100,000 animals drowned? -- new article by Biruitorul (talk · contribs), nom. by PFHLai (talk) 02:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues To me, that hook sounds like "Did you know that KFQ-6 was the first EKBJ7K?" Art LaPella (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(rewording.hook)... that ZSU-37 was the first Soviet series-produced, tracked self-propelled anti-aircraft gun? (is this better?) --MoRsE (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and hook's ref verified. Truthanado (talk) 03:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good 2 me! Source, length, creation verified. BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 00:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. The source for the hook is primary, but that's okay here. « D. Trebbien (talk) 20:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The statement is not followed by an inline citation in the article, which is required as per the #Instructions. Would you add an exact citation to the place in your sources that backs your statement up? Thanks. Thingg 00:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Added inlines directly in the paragraph on Stalin's commissions. NVO (talk) 21:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, I guess I'd do anything to get that 1500 bytes of info. :) Rudget (logs) 21:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Hook and date verified, but the length of the article, currently at 1014 characters (excluding lists, infoboxes, references, and such), is not long enough. It must be 1500 characters or over. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 07:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It might be long enough now. I'm not sure how to count characters. - House of Scandal (talk) 19:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This seemed enough of an appalling notion to make for a hook.--Bedford Pray 05:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... tornado activity in the Sun Prairie, Wisconsin area historically is above the Wisconsin state average, and 90% greater than the overall U.S. average? (self-nom) Note: the expansion of this article is slightly under the fivefold expansion rule (it had 5211 characters of prose on July 12 (5 days ago) and now has 22106 characters. A 5x expansion would be to 26055 characters), but hopefully an exception can be allowed. I intend to add more to the article by the end of today and tomorrow that would likely put it over this mark. - Hexhand (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... we need a ~200-character long hook in the form of a question, with the link to the DYK article in boldface. --74.13.129.166 (talk) 18:29, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 17

  • A couple noms from History of French wine. With the three different angles, I'm not submitting a picture but if a favorite emerges, I can try and find a commons pic to go with that hook.
Nuclear Energy
Nuclear Energy
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues The article (excluding infoboxes, lists, ect.) is only 1467 characters. It has to be 1500 or more characters, but that should be fixed easily. And the hook, IMO, it is not too interesting, but because it is the smallest school, I suppose I can take it. Something else would be better though, but I'll accept it. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 08:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now at 1523.--Bedford Pray 15:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Expansion length verified. Foreign language reference taken on good faith. AgneCheese/Wine 02:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The 'the' preceding HMS is not grammatically correct, but she's not listed in J. J. Colledge as a commissioned warship, so she wouldn't have been an HMS anyway. (HM gunboat perhaps?). She is in Janes', but is listed as built in 1897 (and as being named Gwendolen). I'd tend to place these sources as being more authoritative on naval matters than Lonely Planet. Benea (talk) 00:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Changed, although I would like to know what Janes' is. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 01:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See Jane's Fighting Ships or Jane's Information Group. Art LaPella (talk) 05:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Malawi didn't exist until the 1960's?! Kernel Saunters (talk) 14:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
indeed. "...which claimed the only British victory on Lake Nyasa in World War I'..." --Wetman (talk) 19:46, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This aspect of the article needs work. This was the first British naval victory of the entire war and I think may have been the first engagement of the war....Kernel Saunters (talk) 20:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That source says the engagement took place on 13 August, and therefore seems to have overlooked HMS Amphion and her flotilla's sinking of SMS Königin Luise on 4 August 1914, a whole week before the Lake Nyasa engagement, and just 36 hours after the British entry to the war. The destroyer HMS Lance (1914) is accredited with the first British (and Commonwealth) shot of the war, and the gun that fired it is duly preserved at the Imperial War Museum. This was the first engagement and the first victory (and shortly after came the first British casualties when the Amphion hit a mine and sank.) But even so, British and French troops had invaded Togoland on 7 August, while the Germans had attacked South Africa on 10 August. Benea (talk) 21:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Both suggested hooks are inappropriate - needs a rethink. I've updated the article with more info but the lonely planet material on the boat would appear to be mostly inaccurate Kernel Saunters (talk) 16:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa! That's a huge "signature", Thingg. --74.13.129.166 (talk) 18:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, most of the above is a template intended to explain the fivefold rule. It didn't work for me, as no amount of clicking anything led to an explanation of that rule. Art LaPella (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Michael Ferreira was the first amateur billiards player to break the 1000 points barrier when he scored a break of 1149 in 1978? -- new article self-nom by Shovon (talk) 15:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should be its rather than it's. Ntsimp (talk) 14:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, thanks! Changed it. Fribbler (talk) 14:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Carl Johan Cronstedt
Carl Johan Cronstedt
  • ... that Carl Johan Cronstedt (pictured) increased the efficiency of wood-burning stoves by a factor of eight? new article, self nom by --Doug talk 13:02, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    (alternate)... that Carl Johan Cronstedt (pictured) increased the efficiency of wood-burning stoves by eight times with a new technology? --Doug talk 18:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    (alternate)... that Carl Johan Cronstedt (pictured) increased the efficiency of wood-burning stoves by eight times with a new masonry tile stove? --Doug talk 18:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    (alternate)... that Carl Johan Cronstedt (pictured) increased the efficiency of wood-burning stoves by eight times with a 1767 new design? --Doug talk 18:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    (alternate)... that Carl Johan Cronstedt (pictured) increased the efficiency of wood-burning stoves so much it revolutionized the building industry?--Doug talk 18:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    (alternate)... that Carl Johan Cronstedt (pictured) increased the efficiency of wood-burning stoves so much it revolutionized the building industry starting in the eighteenth century?--Doug talk 18:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    (alternate)... that Carl Johan Cronstedt (pictured) increased the efficiency of wood-burning stoves so much it saved forests from excess usage?--Doug talk 18:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Marie Curie's birthplace
Marie Curie's birthplace
Created July 2, 2006. Within the last five days expanded from 1,951 char. (July 9) to 2,674 char. (July 17) without infoboxes, cats and refs.[1] --Poeticbent talk 15:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
before expanding: 15 March 2008 Martim33 (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Castle Square, Warsaw
Castle Square, Warsaw
Created June 17, 2005. Within the last five days expanded from 3,776 char. (July 8) to 3,798 (July 17) without infoboxes, cats and refs.[2] --Poeticbent talk 15:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
before expanding: 19 November 2007 Martim33 (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Madeline Kahn made her screen debut in De Düva, an Academy Award nominated short comedy that parodied the films of Swedish director Ingmar Bergman? (self-nom, new article) -- SamuelWantman 10:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length verified. References have some formatting issues but I'm more interested in the ref for Madeline Kahn's debut which leads to a dead IMDB link. AgneCheese/Wine 10:39, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Kahn ref goes to Slate.com. The IMDB ref has been fixed. -- SamuelWantman 10:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Everything looks fine now. Thanks for the quick fix. AgneCheese/Wine 10:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jack the Bulldog, in costumed form, as the Georgetown Hoyas' Mascot at a basketball game.
Jack the Bulldog, in costumed form, as the Georgetown Hoyas' Mascot at a basketball game.
File:Gettysburg Mason Memorial.JPG
Just curious, is it usual to include pictures of oneself in articles? It seems likely to me, judging from the resemblance to the picture on his talk page and the fact that the pic was taken by someone with the same last name, that this picture includes the nominator. Just struck me as odd. Is there a policy on this? Lvklock (talk) 09:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I tried cropping myself out, but I didn't like the look. I may have others pictures of it from previous visits, but I have no idea where they are at this time. BorgQueen is known for cropping images to use on DYK. I know of no policy sayin g this is bad or good. It does give the looker some idea how big the monument is, as the handsome guy in question *wink* is 6'4".--Bedford Pray 15:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
About the photo, I think that following BorgQueen's example would be best. Also, Bedford and I are deemed to be engaging in an edit war, in which Bedford opposes DYK for another DYK-nominated article involving Freemasons, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Grand Lodge of West Virginia - EDIT WAR, and/or July 12 nominations section below. The present nominated article also suffers some of the deficiencies discussed in a current Wikipedia Talk:DYK discussion. Reviewers of the present hook should perhaps consult those discussions. doncram (talk) 15:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Rolls eyes* That Masonic article was a hit piece, written as such. A pure article on any Grand Lodge, discussing its history, would be OK; a piece where the majority of it is recent negative news about the Grand Lodge is not cool. The only reason you got involved in that article was to dis' me, and we both know that.--Bedford Pray 17:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above image is copyrighted. --Poeticbent talk 01:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but a copyright that allows its use on Wikipedia however we wish; it just means that someone on another website wants to use it, they must say who the photographer was. Besides, it was probably taken on my camera, and I've dealt with the picture taker longer than I've dealt with anyone else (37 years).--Bedford Pray 02:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me, but I’d go with the plain {{Copyrighted free use}} instead to be on a safe side. --Poeticbent talk 02:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 16

  • I got a few again here, that could work. He is notable for Eurovision and his long career.
... that Greek singer Sakis Rouvas co-hosted the Eurovision Song Contest 2006 in Athens, Greece with Maria Menounos?
... that Greek singer Sakis Rouvas represented Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2004 winning third place?
... that Greek singer Sakis Rouvas has released 11 studio albums since 1991? self-nom. expanded substantially. Greekboy (talk) 22:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nice comprehensive and well illustrated article, would make a good lead. Gatoclass (talk) 04:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Victuallers has alerted me to a concurrent expansion of Josiah's brother William's article. So I propose a new double nom:
The ODNB needs to be used to verify this, which requires an editor with a British library card to access the website. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 22:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lodovico Trevisan
Lodovico Trevisan
  • Definite article added to hook. "the Lithuanian press ban" Thingg 15:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • ok, thanks for the correction, M.K. (talk) 14:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Length and date verified; non-English reference accepted on good faith. One slight thing: could you perhaps change the hook slightly to clarify half of what - I can't tell at present whether it means 'half of all Lithuanian language books in the world', 'half of all the books in Lithuania', or 'half of all the Lithuanian books smuggled from Lithuania Minor'. Olaf Davis | Talk 09:05, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Paweł Kubisz
Paweł Kubisz
  • Not a five-fold expansion. Article was expanded from 1553 to 5035 characters (5x expansion would be 7765 characters). Thingg 15:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Right, still I think it is quite a significant expansion compared to the last version before expansion. - Darwinek (talk) 16:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Chianan Plain
Chianan Plain
  • ... that the Chianan Plain (pictured), the largest plain of Taiwan located at the central-southwestern region of the island, has three harvests of rice crops annually? --new article self-nom by luuva (talk) 18:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
article is new and 2400 characters. However only 1100 characters are new, the rest copied from Organic certification. Is this eligible for DYK? --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 16:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
2400 total - 1100 new = 1300 old. 1300x5=6500. You need an expanded article at 6500+ characters long to qualify for DYK. --74.14.23.61 (talk) 02:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
1817. The article is wrong twice. --76.64.77.19 (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article fixed by NishKid. And I'm fixing the hook now. --76.64.77.19 (talk) 16:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the Terling Windmill used in the film Oh, Mr. Porter!? This seems snappier, gives the name of this article itself, and gives us a rare opportunity to end a sentence in "!?" and have it be grammatically correct. (c: - House of Scandal (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's much better. My suggestion isn't even grammatical! - House of Scandal (talk) 13:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hook uncited. Gatoclass (talk) 03:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Reference found and added. Mjroots (talk) 08:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a new article (as per the nominator's claim)? According to the article's history, it has been online since 2005. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which article, Ecoleetage? Terling Windmill seems fine. Has someone cleaned up the crime scene after your accusation was posted? --76.64.77.19 (talk) 12:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I am aware, the history of an article can't be cleared. I think Ecoleetage may have been looking at the history of the Oh, Mr Porter! article. The Terling Windmill article looks fine to me as well. EasyPeasy21 (talk) 12:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just to confirm, the article on Terling windmill is the newly created one. Mjroots (talk) 14:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My bad Very sorry - I am a fan of Oh, Mr. Porter! and I mistook the entry as being for that film. I apologise for the error. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, um, how big is a 50 Euro coin then? Johnbod (talk) 02:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
50 Euro coin? 50 cent Euro coin, you mean. --BorgQueen (talk) 14:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, that's what I meant, thanks. And to answer Johnbod's question, it apparently has a diameter of 24.25 mm. ?c: - House of Scandal (talk) 03:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nice pic, but I don't think the refs (all pet shop websites) are good enough. Gatoclass (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd welcome more help improving the article per Gatoclass's recommendation. I have added sourced material from a few non-commercial websites but it seems that hobbyists and breeders rather than entomologists are the main source of online information about species like these. - House of Scandal (talk) 18:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Charlie Waitt was one of the first to wear baseball gloves, but was taunted and called a "sissy" by fans and teammates because he wore gloves for protecting his hands? Self-nom. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 08:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Date verified. But the article itself, excluding infoboxes, lists, references and sources, is only 296 characters. The article has to be 1500 characters or over. Not just that, but the hook isn't exciting or interesting. A lot of famous bands go to Hollywood to further their career. A more exciting and something that happens not very often of a hook hook would be better. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 01:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 15

  • The ref in the article for the first Filipino to play in the NBL is not so clear cut. The source quotes the Slingers managing director saying "Jason becoming the first Filipino to sign a pro contract with us to play in the highly competitive Australian NBL" (emphasis mine) That seems to imply that Castro is the first Filipino to sign with the Slingers, not necessarily the first Filipino to play in the NBL. Any clarification on this would be appreciated. AgneCheese/Wine 06:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image was removed. --I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 00:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length verified. References regarding the "national symbol" needs to be clarified. Between the two hooks, I think the 1st is a little better. AgneCheese/Wine 02:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We can leave out "a national symbol" from the hook while we wait for the refs to be written into the wikipage. --PFHLai (talk) 05:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Leave it out even after writing the refs in. The hook is long enough. --74.13.129.166 (talk) 18:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Norton Priory
Norton Priory
  • ... that the excavation at Norton Priory, Cheshire (pictured), in the 1970s was the largest excavation to be carried out by modern methods on any monastic site in Europe? or
  • To comply with the instructions, would you add inline citations at the end of the sentences mentioned in the hooks to point to the exact pages in the book where the statements are mentioned? (I don't own the book, or I'd do it myself) Thingg 19:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. The citations were already at the ends of the paragraphs in the body of the article containing the hooks. So that the rest of these paragraphs are not messed up by further citations in their middles, I've added citations to the sentences in the lead. I know that this is not generally approved but they can always be removed when the DYK exercise is over. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Komsomolskaya station, Moscow Metro
Komsomolskaya station, Moscow Metro
  • Neither new or expanded five-fold. Mastrchf (t/c) 16:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately the x5 expansion has to have been made within the last five days, and it looks to me that there has only been about a x2 expansion in that time. Gatoclass (talk) 11:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, check history. Expansion more than 5 days ago don't count. You're late. You should've nominated this under "July 10" (when expansion began), and it would still be eligible yesterday. You may want to move this nom down to that section below and ask an admin nicely. --76.64.77.19 (talk) 14:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Admins here at DYK are usually very nice. But you'd better move this nom quickly, before a new batch of expired noms gets there at the end of today. Good luck. --76.64.77.19 (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Too late now. Even the "July 11" section is gone. --74.14.17.3 (talk) 03:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article is peppered with peacock terms, such as "majestic", "imposing", etc. There are way too many images for a short article - please remove some. --BorgQueen (talk) 23:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 14:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues No redlinks are allowed in the hook (see the previously Unwritten Rules), especially when it means we can't find your article. (I also removed the second "that" because I couldn't parse the sentence that way.) Art LaPella (talk) 22:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Must have been getting tired after working too long - corrected title and links so they are both (accurately) blue links.--Parkwells (talk) 22:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article was not expanded (it actually lost some DYK characters), but the current version is much better organized and well cited. Also, the hook is very intriguing. (I didn't know James Cameron survived a lynching ;) ) Don't know if we could make an exception for this one. Thingg 19:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I changed James Cameron (activist) to the piped James Cameron because that's what we usually do at Did You Know, but I didn't realize that it would cause confusion with the apparently better-known James Cameron. Art LaPella (talk) 21:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's not what I meant at all. :) I think it makes the hook much more interesting; which is A Good Thing™ Thingg 18:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where is this? The main page is meant for a general audience, not necessarily people familiar with things in your country. More context, please. --76.64.77.19 (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not a five-fold expansion. Article was expanded from 2299 to 3893 characters (5x expansion would be 11495). Thingg 19:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Arnaud de Pellegrue, a cardinal-nephew of Pope Clement V, led the papal army in a 1309 war against Venice? Savidan 02:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Length fine, hook assumed to be verified by off-line source. A minor issue (which should not prevent this from reaching DYK) is that the article is hard to read due to the special vocabulary throughout. If you can fix this, please do to make it more accessible reading. « D. Trebbien (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on July 14

Georg Christian Oeder
Georg Christian Oeder
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues We need to see what publication that story in the footnote ran in. Right now it has just a title and date. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That was a typo. I've added the publication, which is the Los Angeles Times.Cbl62 (talk) 06:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cesare Borgia
Cesare Borgia
  • Article is 546 characters. Tables, lists, etc. are not counted. Thingg 18:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Nemesis"? I always thought that Xiongnu was a tributary state. No? --PFHLai (talk) 04:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hook is not cited to a reliable source. Thingg 17:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sindhi topi.jpg
  • Article was not created or expanded five-fold in the last 5 days. Thingg 17:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • No article bolded and neither of the linked articles were created or expanded five-fold in the last five days. Thingg 17:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not expanded five fold in the past 5 days. Mastrchf (t/c) 19:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
True, its been expanded well beyond that over the past ten days. Could you please indicate your math, please? - Hexhand (talk) 20:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On 2 July the article was 13K, as of now it is 21K. Five times 13 does not equal 21. Additionally, most of the exapnsion since the 8th has been addition of images, tables, and requests for more expansion [3]. --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto on what Petey said. I've messaged you on your talk page also Hexhand. Mastrchf (t/c) 21:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would argue that most of the expansion this past week has replaced spurious or non-notable information with actual credible sources and images that we can actually use, fixing formatting issues that made the article virtually unreadable, and added citations where few existed before. Or, when we say expansion, are we only reading that as girth? - Hexhand (talk) 22:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the rules state pretty explicitly that the article must be expanded five-fold. It doesn't mean that you haven't done a wonderful job of improving the article, and helping the project, only that the article is ineligible for DYK. But don't be discouraged, take pride in the state of the article. Mastrchf (t/c) 23:11, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That seems to vastly favor new articles over improved articles. Hell, I could create a stub article for booger art, so long as I reliably cited it, and - according to this criteria - have a better shot at a DYK than an article which has been substantially improved. This seems to be a short-bus criteria, I am thinking. - Hexhand (talk) 23:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Correct. Several of our rules could be gamed that way. If we had more volunteers we could debate the quality of articles for hours. As it is we have time enough to count characters in a semi-automated way. A better place to debate the rules is at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. Art LaPella (talk) 23:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • An article with so many empty sections and {{Expand}} tags is obviously unfinished and thus not ready to be featured on MainPage. I suspect that if those 9 {{Expand}} tags can get replaced by some prose within the next few days, there'll be a 5X expansion. Have fun! --PFHLai (talk) 06:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, of course. Please forgive my frustrated inquiries, and thank you for answering them with equanimity. Might I direct you to two different DYK suggestions I added yesterday at the bottom of this day's section? - Hexhand (talk) 13:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's on MainPage now! :-) --PFHLai (talk) 21:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • FYI Only one of the nine {{Expand}} tags is left. It's almost time to re-evaluate this Sun Prairie, Wisconsin article. BTW, there's another proposed hook posted above in the July 18th section. --PFHLai (talk) 21:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also