Foxtail family


from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Foxtail family
Wire-haired amaranth (Amaranthus retroflexus)

Wire-haired amaranth ( Amaranthus retroflexus )

Systematics
Subdivision : Seed plants (Spermatophytina)
Class : Bedecktsamer (Magnoliopsida)
Eudicotyledons
Nuclear eudicotyledons
Order : Clove-like (Caryophyllales)
Family : Foxtail family
Scientific name
Amaranthaceae
Yuss.

The foxtail plants (Amaranthaceae) are a family in the order of the carnation-like (Caryophyllales) within the flowering plants (Magnoliopsida). The goosefoot family (Chenopodiaceae), which is often managed separately, is also incorporated here. The foxtail grasses are not related to this group .

description

Subfamily Camphorosmoideae: Illustration of the Sand-Radmelde ( Bassia laniflora )

Appearance and leaves

Most types are annual or perennial herbaceous plants or subshrubs ; there are also some shrubs ; few species are lianas or trees . Many species are succulent . In many species are attached to the stems , the nodes ( Nodien ) thickened. The wood of the perennial parts of the stem axis shows an "abnormal" growth in thickness typical of the family , which is only missing in the Polycnemoideae .

The leaves are mostly alternate , occasionally also opposite . There are no stipules. The shape of the leaves is extremely variable, the leaf margins are entire or serrated, their cross-section is flat to stalk-round, in some species the leaves are also reduced to tiny scales.

Subfamily Polycnemoideae: Five-fold flowers of Nitrophila occidentalis
Pantoporate pollen grains from Halothamnus glaucus , scanning electron microscopy

blossoms

The bracts and bracts are either herbaceous or dry-skinned. The inflorescence is more or less herbaceous or dry-skinned and consists of (rarely one to) usually five (rarely up to eight) tepals . The stamens, which are mostly in the same number, are either in front of the tepals or in between. They arise at the base of the flower from a disc, which in some species has appendages (pseudostaminodes). The anthers have two or four pollen sacs . In the Caroxyloneae there are bubble-shaped anthers appendages . The pollen grains are round with numerous openings ( pantoporat ), whereby the number of pores can range from a few to 250 (in Froelichia ). The best one (rarely to six) to three pistils have become a top permanent ovary grown. In the ovary there is one (rarely two) basal ovule .

Fruits and seeds

Either the seeds serve as the dispersal unit ( diaspores ), but often the cladding leaves are also still present in the ripe fruit and undergo transformations that serve to spread. Occasionally the bracts and propsheets are also included in the diaspore. Capsule fruits or berries are less common . The seed is oriented horizontally or differently, often with a thickened and lignified seed coat. The embryo is green or white, spiral (then without nutrient tissue) or ring-shaped (rarely straight).

Chromosome number

The basic chromosome number is (rarely six) usually eight or nine (rarely 17).

ingredients

The occurrence of betalaines is widespread among the foxtail plants . The earlier Chenopodiaceae often contain isoflavonoids .

In phytochemical examinations, methylenedioxyflavonols , saponins , triterpenes , ecdysteroids and special carbohydrates were found in the roots .

Photosynthetic pathway

With around 800 C 4 species , the foxtail family are the largest group with this photosynthetic pathway within the eudicotyledons (around 1600 C 4 species). Within the family there are different types of C 4 photosynthesis and about 17 different types of leaf anatomy. It is therefore assumed that this trait was acquired independently about 15 times in the evolution of this family, 2/3 of which in the former Chenopodiaceae. C 4 photosynthesis first occurred in the early Miocene , about 24 million years ago. In some groups, however, this photosynthetic pathway emerged much later, six (or less) million years ago.

The multiple development of C 4 photosynthesis in the Amaranthaceae is seen as an adaptation to increasing water scarcity and higher temperatures. Due to their greater efficiency in water consumption, these species had an advantage in dry habitats and were able to spread there.

use

Some species, such as spinach ( Spinacia oleracea ) or cultivated forms of the beet ( Beta vulgaris ) (e.g. beetroot , Swiss chard ), are used as vegetables . Other forms of Beta vulgaris are the fodder beet and the sugar beet . The seeds of several Amaranthus species and quinoa ( Chenopodium quinoa ), rarely also called quinoa , are used in a similar way to grain ( pseudo- grain ).

Mexican goose foot ( Dysphania ambrosioides ) and worm seed goose foot ( Dysphania anthelmintica ) are medicinal plants .

Soda is obtained from several types .

As ornamental plants , for example, are Amaranthus caudatus , celosia and Iresine used.

distribution

The Amaranthaceae family is distributed worldwide in the temperate zones as well as the subtropics and tropics . Many species are adapted to soils with a relatively high salinity or occur in dry steppe and semi-desert areas.

Systematics

Cladogram of the plant family Amaranthaceae sl, modified and simplified, based on phylogenetic work by Müller & Borsch 2005, Kadereit & al. 2006, Sanchez del-Pino & al. 2009
Subfamily Amaranthoideae: Achyranthes splendens
Subfamily Gomphrenoideae: Gomphrena arborescens
Subfamily betoideae: sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris subsp. Vulgaris var. Altissima )
Subfamily Camphorosmoideae: Maireana sedifolia
Subfamily Chenopodioideae: Grayia spinosa
Subfamily Salicornioideae: Sarcocornia perennis
Subfamily Salsoloideae: Kali salt herb ( Kali turgida )
Subfamily Suaedoideae: Suaeda nigra

A group of genera that comprises more than half of the species has traditionally been separated as a separate family of goosefoot plants (Chenopodiaceae). Molecular biological studies have shown that the two traditionally differentiated families are closely related and have suggested that the goosefoot family are paraphyletic and only result in a monophyletic taxon when combined with the Amaranthaceae in the narrower sense . Recent publications continue to use the family name Chenopodiaceae.

The Amaranthaceae family was set up in 1789 by Antoine Laurent de Jussieu in Genera Plantarum , pp. 87-88. The Chenopodiaceae family was first published in 1799 by Étienne Pierre Ventenat in Tableau du Regne Vegetal , 2, p. 253. The oldest scientific name of the expanded taxon that is valid according to the priority rule is Amaranthaceae.

From the cladogram it becomes clear that the classification of the Chenopodiaceae depends crucially on the subfamily Polycnemoideae : If it is regarded as part of the family as before, the Amaranthaceae in the narrower sense must also belong, and the name of the extended family is Amaranthaceae according to the priority rule. However, if the Polycnemoideae were separated as their own family, then Chenopodiaceae and Amaranthaceae would be two monophyletic relatives that could be viewed as separate families.

In the Amaranthaceae family in the new scope are the genera of the earlier families: Achyranthaceae Raf. , Atriplicaceae Durande , Betaceae Burnett , Blitaceae T. Post & Kuntze , Celosiaceae Martynov , Chenopodiaceae Ventenat nom. cons., Corispermaceae Link , Deeringiaceae J.Agardh , Dysphaniaceae (Pax) Pax nom. cons., Gomphrenaceae Raf. Containing , Polycnemaceae Lot , Salicorniaceae Martynov , Salsolaceae Lot , Spinaciaceae Lot .

The systematics of the Amaranthaceae family has been intensively researched for several years. Molecular biological studies have shown that the previous classification, which was based on morphological and anatomical features, did not reflect the family relationships. The sooner the Gänsefußgewächsen (Chenopodiaceae) attributed types are classified into eight subfamilies is presently (2011) (the processing has not been completed): the Polycnemoideae which are initially considered, as well as the betoideae , Camphorosmoideae , chenopodioideae , Corispermoideae , Salicornioideae , Salsoloideae and Suaedoideae . Within the Amaranthaceae s. st. (in the narrower sense) the subfamily Amaranthoideae and some genera within the Gomphrenoideae turned out to be polyphyletic , so that further taxonomic changes are to be expected here in the next few years .

The family Amaranthaceae sl is divided into ten subfamilies in the preliminary systematics and contains about 176 genera with about 2050 to 2500 species:

  • Subfamily Amaranthoideae Schinz : With about 57 genera, see main article Amaranthoideae . Müller & Borsch (2005) distinguish between several clades:
    • "Basal group"
    • Cladus Amaranthoids
    • Tribe Celosieae
    • Cladus aervoids
    • Cladus Achyranthoids
  • Subfamily Gomphrenoideae Schinz : With about 13 genera in three clades, see main article Gomphrenoideae :
    • Cladus iresinoids
    • Cladus Alternantheroids
    • Cladus Gomphrenoids

swell

  • The Amaranthaceae family on the AP website. (Sections description, photosynthetic pathway, ingredients, systematics)
  • Kai Müller & Thomas Borsch : Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae using matK / trnK sequence data - evidence from parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian approaches , In: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden , Volume 92, 2005, pp. 66-102.

Individual evidence

  1. a b c d e f g Kai Müller & Thomas Borsch: Phylogenetics of Amaranthaceae using matK / trnK sequence data - evidence from parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian approaches , In: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden , 92, 2005, p. 66– 102.
  2. a b Gudrun Kadereit, Thomas Borsch, Kurt Weising, and Helmut Freitag: Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C 4 photosynthesis . In: International Journal of Plant Sciences , Volume 164 (6), 2003, p. 982.
  3. a b c Gudrun Kadereit, S. Hohmann & Joachim W. Kadereit: A synopsis of Chenopodiaceae subfam. Betoideae and notes on the taxonomy of Beta , In Willdenowia , Volume 36, 2006, pages 9-19. doi: 10.3372 / wi.36.36101
  4. a b c Gudrun Kadereit & Helmut Freitag: Molecular phylogeny of Camphorosmeae (Camphorosmoideae, Chenopodiaceae): Implications for biogeography, evolution of C4-photosynthesis and taxonomy , In: Taxon , Volume 60 (1), 2011, pp. 51-78.
  5. a b Gudrun Kadereit, Evgeny V. Mavrodiev, Elizabeth H. Zacharias & Alexander P. Sukhorukov: Molecular phylogeny of Atripliceae (Chenopodioideae, Chenopodiaceae): Implications for systematics, biogeography, flower and fruit evolution, and the origin of C4 Photosynthesis , In : American Journal of Botany , Volume 97 (10), 2010, pp. 1664-1687.
  6. a b c Gudrun Kadereit, Ladislav Mucina & Helmut Freitag: Phylogeny of Salicornioideae (Chenopodiaceae): diversification, biogeography, and evolutionary trends in leaf and flower morphology , In: Taxon , Volume 55 (3), 2006, pages 617-642.
  7. a b c d Hossein Akhani, Gerald Edwards & Eric H. Roalson: Diversification Of The Old World Salsoleae SL (Chenopodiaceae): Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis Of Nuclear And Chloroplast Data Sets And A Revised Classification , In: International Journal of Plant Sciences , 168 (6), 2007, pp. 931-956.
  8. a b Maxim V. Kapralov, Hossein Akhani, Elena V. Voznesenskaya, Gerald Edwards, Vincent Franceschi & Eric H. Roalson: Phylogenetic Relationships in the Salicornioideae / Suaedoideae / Salsoloideae sl (Chenopodiaceae) Clade and a Clarification of the Phylogenetic Position of Bienertia and Alexandra Using Multiple DNA Sequence Datasets , In: Systematic Botany , 2006.
  9. a b Alexander P. Sukhorukov: Fruit anatomy and its taxonomic significance in Corispermum (Corispermoideae, Chenopodiaceae). In: Willdenowia , Volume 37, 2007, ISSN  0511-9618 , pp. 63-87, doi: 10.3372 / wi.37.37103 .
  10. ^ A b Peter Schütze, Helmut Freitag & Kurt Weising: An integrated molecular and morphological study of the subfamily Suaedoideae Ulbr. (Chenopodiaceae) , In: Plant Systematics and Evolution , Volume 239, 2003, pp. 257-286. Summary: doi: 10.1007 / s00606-003-0013-2
  11. a b Ivonne Sánchez del-Pino, Thomas Borsch & Timothy J. Motle: trnL-F and rpl16 Sequence Data and Dense Taxon Sampling Reveal Monophyly of Unilocular Anthered Gomphrenoideae (Amaranthaceae) and an Improved Picture of Their Internal Relationships , In: Systematic Botany , Volume 34 (1), 2009, pp. 57-67. doi: 10.1600 / 036364409787602401
  12. Susy Fuentes-Bazan, Pertti Uotila, Thomas Borsch: A novel phylogeny-based generic classification for Chenopodium sensu lato, and a tribal rearrangement of Chenopodioideae (Chenopodiaceae) . In: Willdenowia 42, 2012, p. 17. doi: 10.3372 / wi.42.42101

Web links

Commons : Foxtail Family  - Collection of images, videos and audio files