Jump to content

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Video games: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎Gaming jargon: Re-worded
Randomran (talk | contribs)
→‎Inappropriate content: adding another guideline
Line 45: Line 45:


# '''Non-notable articles and spinouts''': Avoid creating new articles on non-notable topics. A [[WP:N|notable]] topic must receive significant coverage in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that are [[WP:sources|independent]] of the subject. A smaller article should only be split from a larger topic if the new article would itself be notable.
# '''Non-notable articles and spinouts''': Avoid creating new articles on non-notable topics. A [[WP:N|notable]] topic must receive significant coverage in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that are [[WP:sources|independent]] of the subject. A smaller article should only be split from a larger topic if the new article would itself be notable.
#: <small>Based on: [[WP:GNG|Wikipedia's general notability guideline]], [[WP:FICT|Notability (fiction)]], and [[WP:AVOIDSPLIT|Wikipedia's guideline to avoiding unnecessary splits]]</small>
#: <small>Based on: [[WP:GNG|Wikipedia's general notability guideline]], and [[WP:AVOIDSPLIT|Wikipedia's guideline to avoiding unnecessary splits]]</small>
#'''Numerous short articles''': One large article usually provides better organization and context for a topic. Don't create multiple small articles when one larger compilation will do. The ideal article is neither too large nor too small.
#'''Numerous short articles''': One large article usually provides better organization and context for a topic. Don't create multiple small articles when one larger compilation will do. The ideal article is neither too large nor too small.
#:<small>Based on: [[Wikipedia:Article size|Wikipedia's guideline on article size]]</small>
#:<small>Based on: [[Wikipedia:Article size|Wikipedia's guideline on article size]]</small>
Line 53: Line 53:
#:<small>Based on: [[WP:NOTHOWTO|Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook: Instruction manuals]]</small>
#:<small>Based on: [[WP:NOTHOWTO|Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook: Instruction manuals]]</small>
#'''Excessive fictional details''': A ''concise'' plot summary is appropriate to cover a [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] game, character, or setting. Information beyond that is unnecessary and should be removed.
#'''Excessive fictional details''': A ''concise'' plot summary is appropriate to cover a [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] game, character, or setting. Information beyond that is unnecessary and should be removed.
#:<small>Based on: [[WP:PLOT|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Plot summaries]], [[WP:FICT|Notability (fiction)]], and [[Wikipedia:UNDUEWEIGHT|Wikipedia's policy on undue weight]]</small>
#:<small>Based on: [[WP:PLOT|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Plot summaries]], and [[Wikipedia:UNDUEWEIGHT|Wikipedia's policy on undue weight]]</small>
# '''Lists of gameplay items, weapons, or concepts.''' Specific point values, [[Xbox Live#Gamerscore|achievements]] and trophies, time-limits, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are considered inappropriate. Sometimes a concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry.
# '''Lists of gameplay items, weapons, or concepts.''' Specific point values, [[Xbox Live#Gamerscore|achievements]] and trophies, time-limits, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are considered inappropriate. Sometimes a concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry.
#:<small>Based on: [[WP:PLOT|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Plot summaries]], [[WP:NOTHOWTO|Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook: Instruction manuals]], and [[Wikipedia:UNDUEWEIGHT|Wikipedia's policy on undue weight]]</small>
#:<small>Based on: [[WP:PLOT|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Plot summaries]], [[WP:NOTHOWTO|Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook: Instruction manuals]], and [[Wikipedia:UNDUEWEIGHT|Wikipedia's policy on undue weight]]</small>
Line 62: Line 62:
# '''Rumors and speculation''': Speculation about future games, or rumors about content within a game, should not be included.
# '''Rumors and speculation''': Speculation about future games, or rumors about content within a game, should not be included.
#: <small>Based on: [[WP:CRYSTAL|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball]], [[WP:NOR|Wikipedia is not a repository of original research or original thought]]</small>
#: <small>Based on: [[WP:CRYSTAL|Wikipedia is not a crystal ball]], [[WP:NOR|Wikipedia is not a repository of original research or original thought]]</small>
# '''Exhaustive version histories''': A list of every version/beta/patch of a game is inappropriate. Consider a summary of the game's development instead.
#: <small>Based on: [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|Wikipedia's guideline on lists]]</small>


These standards have been developed in accordance with fundamental [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|Wikipedia policies and guidelines]] and reflect the [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] of the community. All editors should understand and follow these standards, though they should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception.
These standards have been developed in accordance with fundamental [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|Wikipedia policies and guidelines]] and reflect the [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] of the community. All editors should understand and follow these standards, though they should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception.

Revision as of 03:36, 26 August 2008

✔ This page is considered a guideline on Wikipedia. It is generally accepted among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. However, it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception. When editing this page, please ensure that your revision reflects consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this page's talk page.

The following are guidelines about article content established by consensus among Wikipedians and members of the WikiProject Video games. Please discuss them on the talk page if you have ideas or questions. An informal guide geared towards editing video game articles to featured status can be found here. You should also be familiar with the guide to writing better articles.

Neutral point of view

Template:WPCVG Sidebar Make sure to write from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not the place for writing reviews. If you can provide factual records of opinions, that is of course excellent. Magazine reviews, awards and quotes from game developers (except the developer's own advertising) can and should be used - those carry weight on their own. If there is more than one take on the subject, make sure to include all and to treat all as potentially true. For these, be sure to clarify that they are opinions, not incontrovertible facts.

Watch out for overly general and vague statements, such as "there are many who think Game X is great". Such weasel words are not particularly factual and usually nothing but the author's opinions in disguise. Try to provide more specific information, and back the statement up with references to magazines, websites, etc. In addition, avoid peacock terms; these pieces of fluff actually lower the prose to an unprofessional level.

Content

Overview: what content is appropriate for a game article?

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Articles on video games should give an encyclopedic overview of a game and its importance to the industry. Readers should be presented with a concise overview of the game's plot and gameplay. It is also important for readers to be able to learn how the game was developed and its commercial and critical reception. Because the encyclopedia will be read by gamers and non-gamers alike, it is important not to clutter an article with a detailed description of how to play it or an excessive amount of non-encyclopedic trivia. A general rule of thumb to follow if unsure: If the content only has value to people actually playing the game, it is unsuitable. Always remember the bigger picture: video game articles should be readable and interesting to non-gamers.

Content that is inappropriate for wikipedia may find a good home at gaming wikis: Encyclopedia Gamia for general info/trivia, StrategyWiki for walkthrough/strategy/gameplay content, and GamerWiki or Wikibooks Electronic games bookshelf. To propose that an article or section should be copied to a gaming wiki, use the {{Copy to gaming wiki}} tag. See Help:Transwiki on how to move information to other wikis. To simply tag such information for removal, please add the {{gameguide}} tag to the article in question.

Essential content

Each video game article should include a minimum set of standard elements:

  • An infobox, completed correctly and appropriately. See the VG Templates for more instructions on how to use the different templates that are used in writing video game articles.
  • The {{WikiProject Video games}} template placed on the article's Talk page. This lets others know that the article is part of WikiProject Video Games.
  • A "Development" or "History" section. Specifically for articles about games, it is essential to explain how the game was made. This information is highly useful in constructing articles on fictional aspects within a game as well.
  • A "Reception" section. This shows the impact that the subject had on the game industry: commercially, artistically, and technologically.
  • When writing about a game, be sure to categorize it by genre, platform, and year. See Wikipedia:Categorization.

If these essential pieces of information cannot be found in reliable sources, then it may be more appropriate to merge this topic into a parent article.

How to research essential content

Finding critical review for older games may be difficult as most publication was done in print gaming magazines before the explosive growth of the Internet. Several project members have kept old copies of certain video game publications. A list of users and notable data is kept at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Magazines. If you find something relevant to your article on that page, contact an appropriate user to request referencing.

If you wish to contribute to the project, please add your username to issues you have or create new issue listings if none currently exist. Please be thorough when checking magazines, and be sure to wikify game titles. Follow the simple table format.

If you prefer, add {{User WPCVGm}} to your user page to generate interest in the project.

Inappropriate content

Below is a list of content that is generally considered beyond the scope of information of Wikipedia articles on video games and related video game topics.

  1. Non-notable articles and spinouts: Avoid creating new articles on non-notable topics. A notable topic must receive significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. A smaller article should only be split from a larger topic if the new article would itself be notable.
    Based on: Wikipedia's general notability guideline, and Wikipedia's guideline to avoiding unnecessary splits
  2. Numerous short articles: One large article usually provides better organization and context for a topic. Don't create multiple small articles when one larger compilation will do. The ideal article is neither too large nor too small.
    Based on: Wikipedia's guideline on article size
  3. Detailed instructions: Saying that a character can jump, shoot, and drop bombs is helpful to understand the game, but avoid explaining button combinations or cheat codes.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook: Instruction manuals
  4. Strategy guides and walkthroughs: Basic strategy concepts are helpful to understand the game, but avoid details about how to solve puzzles and defeat certain foes.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook: Instruction manuals
  5. Excessive fictional details: A concise plot summary is appropriate to cover a notable game, character, or setting. Information beyond that is unnecessary and should be removed.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Plot summaries, and Wikipedia's policy on undue weight
  6. Lists of gameplay items, weapons, or concepts. Specific point values, achievements and trophies, time-limits, character moves, character weight classes, and so on are considered inappropriate. Sometimes a concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Plot summaries, Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, or textbook: Instruction manuals, and Wikipedia's policy on undue weight
  7. Cost: The cost of games, products, or subscriptions in any form should not be included in articles. This includes point values in online stores. Wikipedia is not a sales catalog.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not a directory: Sales catalogs
  8. Homebrew clones and remakes: These are generally included for self-promotion and may infringe on copyrighted works.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not a soapbox, Wikipedia copyright policy
  9. Rumors and speculation: Speculation about future games, or rumors about content within a game, should not be included.
    Based on: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, Wikipedia is not a repository of original research or original thought
  10. Exhaustive version histories: A list of every version/beta/patch of a game is inappropriate. Consider a summary of the game's development instead.
    Based on: Wikipedia's guideline on lists

These standards have been developed in accordance with fundamental Wikipedia policies and guidelines and reflect the consensus of the community. All editors should understand and follow these standards, though they should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception.

Exceptions

There are always exceptions to these rules. In general, anything can become suitable for coverage in Wikipedia if it is given significant attention by reliable sources. For example:

  • It is usually inappropriate to explain strategies, but the "lurking" exploit in Asteroids is an exception because it changed the way developers test their games for exploits.[1]
  • It is usually inappropriate to describe game items in detail. But describing the portal gun from Portal is necessary to understand the game, and has significant coverage in reliable game news reports.[2]
  • It is usually inappropriate to include cost information, but the price of the PlayStation 3 is an exception because it has been criticized by reliable gaming news sites.[3] This should be included in the "Reception" section.
  • It is usually inappropriate to mention or list homebrews and fan remakes of games. However, certain specific homebrew games, such as Grid Wars and Armagetron Advanced, have achieved notability because of their far-reaching impact on the game(s) they are based on.
  • If a short article that has existed for some time is to be merged (per #2 above), merge the content first and only redirect the short article once consensus determines the merge is of sufficient quality.

Style

This is an encyclopedia, and articles should be written formally, not like FAQs, fansites, or player's guides. In addition to the Manual of Style, keep these video game-centric style tips in mind:

  • Do not use second-person pronouns ("you"). In addition to being ambiguous, informal, and unencyclopedic, we cannot assume that the reader is planning on playing the game. Use "the player," the name of the player-controlled character, or put the sentence in the passive voice. Example: "You can fight the boss" becomes "the player can fight the boss," "the character can fight the boss," "Link can fight the boss," or "the boss can be fought." See also Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Avoid second-person pronouns.
  • When writing about a game's story elements be sure to keep a real-world perspective. Simply put, do not describe fiction as fact. For example: "Link awakens after hearing a telepathic message from Zelda." This sentence talks about fiction from a perspective within its world. "The start of the game shows Link awaking after hearing a telepathic message from Zelda." This sentence talks about fiction from the perspective out of its world.
  • Use italics for game titles, but not character names. Ninja Gaiden is okay; Ryu Hayabusa is not.
  • Avoid confusing abbreviations, unless they are standard. PS2 is okay; LoZ:OoT is probably not. Instead, try shortening the title to a few key words: LoZ:OoT becomes Ocarina of Time.
  • When filling out the infobox for a downloadable game (for example, a game on Xbox Live Arcade), the media field should simply read "download" (no quotes).
  • When filling out the infobox for a multi-platform game, the platforms in the platform field should be listed in chronological order; however, if the game was released on multiple platforms on the same day, then list those certain platforms in alphabetical order.
  • Please use appropriate external link templates, such as {{Nintendo.com}}, {{Moby game}}, {{Hotu}} and {{GameFAQs}}. Only add templates when they provide additional, or corroborative, encyclopedic information to the article.
  • Substandard and fluffy prose are unacceptable, even in underdeveloped articles. Ask for copyeditors to help enhance your article's prose, even if you are a solid writer. Avoid redundancies and misplaced formality, such as "in order to" and "upon". You may wish to read "How to satisfy Criterion 1a".

Verb tense

  • When describing a video game or console itself in the abstract, use present tense unless a reliable source proves that no instances of the product exist or the product was never released.
  • However, when describing a specific event related to a console or game, such as production, advertising, reviews, etc., use a tense appropriate for the time period in which the event occurred. Be careful to avoid phrasing that may confuse past and present tense.
    • "The Nintendo Entertainment System is an 8-bit video game console designed by Nintendo, which was released in 1985."
    • "The PS3 is currently being sold worldwide."
  • Similarly, use the present tense for describing things happening in the games (including gameplay), not the past tense. This is logical; even if a game was released decades ago, it still performs the same today as it did on release. Game plots should always be written in present tense, as they happen when the game is played and have not happened. An exception is when describing events that take place prior to the events of the game. For example,
    • "Throughout the game, Pac-Man is chased by four ghosts."
    • "At the beginning of the game, Niko Bellic arrives in Liberty City" as opposed to "At the beginning of the game, Niko Bellic arrived in Liberty City". This event is seen at the beginning of the game, therefore the latter would be incorrect.
    • "Four hundred years prior to the start of the game, the Lefeinish watched their country decline as the Wind Orb went dark."

Japanese and other foreign titles

As the inclusion of Japanese titles can enhance an article on a video game by providing additional cultural context, when possible these titles should be provided as follows.

  • Japanese titles should only be provided for games of Japanese origin whose official English name differs significantly from its Japanese name. Phonetic transcriptions are, as a rule, not considered to be significantly different and thus do not warrant the inclusion of Japanese titles. However, games known in English-speaking countries by their phonetic Japanese titles (e.g. Katamari Damacy) are an exception to this rule; these games should also have their Japanese titles included for clarity.
  • In cases where the meaning of the Japanese title differs from the official English title, Japanese titles should be accompanied by English translations. These translations should be enclosed in quote marks to indicate their unofficial status.
  • Although optional, phonetic transliterations of the Japanese titles are strongly recommended to aid Japanese speakers who are not familiar with kanji. Romanization should follow the Manual of Style guidelines on romanization.
  • Japanese titles, transliterations, and translations should be added using the standard properties of the {{nihongo}} template. Only the English title should be placed in bold characters per the first sentence guidelines in the Manual of Style.

Similar guidelines apply to other games of non-English origin, such as Korean RPGs.

Gaming jargon

Based on: Wikipedia's explaining jargon guideline, and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information

Gaming jargon is often used in reviews, internet forums and casual conversation about video games. Like all jargon, the slang words are familiar to those closely involved with the game industry, but tend to be cryptic to others. For example, you would confuse a person you meet on the street by telling him or her,

"Ryu's 46-hit combo deathmove absolutely p0wns Jin and takes away 85% of Jin's health"

They would puzzle over words like "combo", "deathmove", and "85% health", as well as wondering who "Ryu" and "Jin" are, and how somebody can pawn somebody else. Linking the words to relevant articles can be considered, but this forces the reader to jump back-and-forth among articles to get a fair sense of the meaning. Furthermore, links serve a better purpose as additional readings for enlightenment, rather than required readings for explanation. Writing the sentences with commonly used terminology and excluding jargon would be a better solution, such as

"Among the characters available for players to control, Ryu has an advantage over Jin. He has a super attack technique that deals out a long sequence of hits on Jin and is capable of depleting 85% of Jin's health points."

That said, it is still possible to use gaming jargon in an article. This could be of necessity if the game's concept deals closely and often with the jargon. The jargon would, however, have to be clearly explained (simple and clear sentences) before its first use in the article. For example, if a an adventure game requires players to gather mana crystals (calling it Shwartz gems) to defeat monsters with spells, one could write,

"A key concept of the game is magic. Players are required to gather crystals, Shwartz gems, to increase their magic points. Shwartz gems can be collected by defeating monsters, searching through containers, and buying them at a shop. The gems also bestow additional benefits on the players, such as increasing their amount of protection, increasing their speed, and allowing them to teleport to certain places. Players must possess certain Shwartz to kill the large monsters, bosses, guarding the end of each level."

Another example,

"Boogers can fly 60 Starspitzers, of which 55 are unlocked by executing no-hurt runs."

We can rewrite the bolded jargon to,

"The protagonist Boogers flies spacecraft called Starspitzers. On starting a game, players have the option of five Starspitzers to choose from. When they complete a mission without receiving damage to their spacecraft, a new Starspitzer is added to their choice of spacecrafts. Up to 55 additional Starspitzers can be added in this manner."

The following is a short non-exhaustive list of gaming jargon that have been created on Wikipedia. Use them for research, linking to them appropriately in your game articles.

You can find more of these terms in Category:Video game gameplay, Category:Role-playing game terms, and Category:Video game magic.

In summary,

  • use simpler and common terminology in all instances.
  • only use jargon if they are crucial or unavoidable in explaining the game to the readers.
  • explain jargon briefly on their first usage.
  • link to relevant articles if necessary.
  • always get someone unfamiliar with video games to read your article and locate any jargon in it.

Naming convention

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Video games/Naming

Pop culture citations

Video games have been around long enough to have made their mark in influencing pop culture. Likewise, recognizing a subject's influence on popular culture can enhance an entry subject's notability on Wikipedia. WikiProject Video games recognizes this, and has allowed for the inclusion of pop culture related material with the placement of an In pop culture in Wikipedia video game related entries, along with its subheaders In Film/Television and In Music. However, material included in this section must still adhere to Manual of Style guidelines on trivia as well as suggested guidelines on In Popular Culture appearances.

The following guidelines are to be used for judging if content is notable enough to be included in a pop culture section:

  • All entries must be directly related to the brand and/or character.
    • Worth mention: A licensed TV show based on the game Pac-Man.
    • Not worth mention: A sports figure who has adopted the nickname "Pac-Man" because of perceived similarities between the person and the character.
  • In references to film or television, an appearance is worth inclusion when the game or character in question plays a significant part of the storyline, dialogue, or scene. With very few exceptions, the film, television show, novel, or other work should meet the relevant Wikipedia:Notability criteria for the appearance to be worth mention. Examples of different types of appearance include:
    • Worth mention: The game or related subject is a literal character in the film. The game is integral to the plot of the work (e.g. it would be named in a well-written plot summary). For example, World of Warcraft is significantly featured in the South Park episode "Make Love, Not Warcraft", and should be mentioned within the Warcraft article.
    • Consensus needed: The game or related subject is being played by the major character(s) and is the major subject of the dialog in at least one scene. The game is being played and the game events are an illustration, counterpoint, or ironic commentary on the subject of the discussion—note this must be obvious or sourced to a reliable secondary source, or it will likely be labeled original research. Consider the importance of the dialog or scene to the work as a whole. The second segment of Futurama's "Anthology of Interest II" contains numerous video game references and parodies, some which are more integral to the plot than others. The inclusion of this episode on the specific video game articles would need to be determined by editor consensus.
    • Not worth mention: The game or related subject is only mentioned in passing, or is just a source of occasional interruptions of the real conversation. The game is being played only because the playing of any game is needed for the scene, for example to give the characters something to do or to be distracted by, even if the game is specifically named. The game appears as a background prop. For example, Gears of War is briefly shown in the first few minutes of the movie Live Free or Die Hard but is never referred to by name or appears later; this would not warrant a mention.
  • In references to music, the appearance is worth inclusion when the game or character is integral to the artist, album, or song itself. Examples of worthiness would be where the game or character is part of the song presentation (artwork), song title, album title, or the subject of the song itself. Having a brief mention in the midst of the song does not constitute notability.
  • If there are multiple notable appearances in a specific medium, they should be combined and summarized. For example, multiple notable appearances of Pac-Man in the TV show "Family Guy" can be summarized in a single paragraph.
  • All instances must be documented and follow Wikipedia policies on citing sources and verifiability. Specifically in regards to television citations, a citation to the specific episode using {{cite episode}} should be used. Any entries not following these guidelines will be marked {{fact}} and eventually removed if suitable reference is not found.

Sources

Articles related to video games must follow the requirements for verification and use appropriate reliable sources with inline citations to support the article. A description of what are considered to be reliable sources for video game-related articles and other specific sourcing issues may be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources.

There are several considerations for video game-related articles in regards to sourcing:

  • Using sites like Gamespot and IGN as reliable sources for older games (pre-Template:Vgy) should be carefully considered. While such sites are considered to be reliable sources today, prior to around the turn of the century, they did not necessarily possess this same credibility. Most video games with content pre-dating 2000 should include content from print journals for information released during that time.
  • Gameplay sections should be sourced. This can be sourced using the user's manual for the game, in addition to reviews for the game and other reliable sources.
  • Similarly, plot sections should also be sourced; again, the user's manual and reviews may help here, but one may also find sufficient information contained within strategy guides or FAQs.

External links

External links in video game articles should follow the same convention for external links on Wikipedia in general. Certain links are recommended for video game articles, while other links should be avoided. Specifically, external links should provide information that, barring copyright and technical restrictions, would be part of a Featured Article on Wikipedia. Restricting the type of external links to be added to video game articles helps to avoid the section from becoming a link farm. Additionally, Wikipedia is not a game guide - external links should not be added to include material that explicitly defines the gameplay on certain aspects of the video game.

Appropriate external links - These links should be present if possible in a video game article

  • A video game's official home page (provided by the developer or publisher). Only the English version of the page should be included if there are multiple languages. If no English version exists, then the official page in the language of the country of first publication should be provided, but indicate that the site is in a foreign language. If the developer and publisher each offer a different site, include both.
  • The developers' and publishers' home pages. If, however, the official game site is housed on the developer or publishers pages that allows for obvious navigation to the main developer/publisher site, these may not be necessary.
  • A download source for games that are freely downloadable (such as in freeware or shareware), if such links are completely separate from the game's home page
  • If the page contains substantial information that is relevant but not necessarily encyclopedic in nature, a video game's page at MobyGames or the Internet Movie Database may be added on a case by case basis.

Inappropriate external links - These links should be avoided in video game articles, though if determined by consensus to be valuable, they may be included

  • The video game's page at 1up, GameSpot, IGN, GameSpy and other commercial video game news and reviews sites - Such links can be seen as promotion of the associated commercial sites.
  • Fan-based sites, including those that may extend from the commercial sites listed above (for example, PlanetQuake) - These tend to be self-published venues and are not appropriate for verifiability within Wikipedia.
  • Forums, even if official forums provided by the developer/publisher of the game - Again, these are self-published forums and are not appropriate
  • Links to modern remakes (homebrew clones) - these are generally included for self-promotion and may infringe on copyrighted works

Unacceptable external links - These links are never allowed in video game articles and should be deleted without discussion if found

  • Links to sites that offer complete downloads of video games, ROM or ISO images, or other copyright-infringing works. This includes materials that may be considered abandonware - while the copyright of these works may be in question, Wikipedia's policy forbids even questionable links.

Screenshots and cover art

See also: the Video game images department

For information on adding pictures, see Wikipedia:Picture tutorial.

Wikipedians assert that screenshots of video games and box or cover art usage are protected under the fair use provision of U.S. Copyright law (but see exceptions below). To notify others of the copyright status of such images, uploaded game cover art should include the tag {{Non-free game cover}}. Screenshots of a game should include the tag {{Non-free game screenshot}}. Some screenshots or box covers may be categorized elsewhere, in which case the uploader is still required to provide valid information on the image's source and copyright status. For rendered art or other official graphics that are not screenshots, use the general {{Non-free character}}, {{Non-free promotional}}, or {{Non-free fair use in}} tag and provide information (See Wikipedia:Non-free content for information on what the requirements are). Game company logos may use the {{Non-free logo}} tag. Do not upload screenshots that have been watermarked.

All non-free images must be accompanied by a fair use rationale for each article they appear in, explaining why the image is being used in that article. Any such images that do not contain a proper rationale may be deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. See {{vgrationale}} for a simple template that can help in adding rationales to the most common types of images.

If the video game itself uses a free license (for example GPL), that license extends to screenshots produced by the game. In such cases, use the appropriate free software tag instead. In addition, Ubisoft has also granted Wikipedia free licenses for screenshots of games produced by them. (See {{Ubisoft-screenshot}}). Free images do not need a fair use rationale.

Screenshots are great for enhancing the comprehensiveness of articles, and all computer and video game articles should have at least a couple. Do not go overboard, because excessive placement of fair use images has been known to spark controversy and objection, especially with Featured Article candidates. Cover art should appear in the infobox (see below for more info on the infobox), and ideally, the most recognizable English-language cover should be used to illustrate the subject.

For video game consoles or other hardware, it is preferred that users take their own pictures and upload them. Whenever possible, replace copyrighted images with free (public domain or GNUFDL) alternatives.

For captions, try to conform to the guidelines set forth in Wikipedia:Captions and Wikipedia:WikiProject Writing Captions.

Image file formats

For box art, JPEG will work fine. PNG or SVG are preferred for logos.

Now with the easy stuff out of the way, the file format used for screenshots depends entirely on what type of image it is. JPEGs are fine for most 3D games and some 2D games. Games with a strong emphasis on pixel art/sprites should use PNG. GIFs should only be used for animated images.

Release dates

Release dates should be provided for video game releases in the {{Infobox VG}} template as well as summarized in the article's lead. Release dates should be provided from primarily English-speaking regions, including North America, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand. If the video game is first released in a non-English country, commonly in Japan, then that should also be stated. Region releases (North America, Europe, or even PAL region) are preferred to specific country releases unless there are significant differences in release dates. Releases in non-English countries should not be included in the infobox (unless it is first released in a non-English country), but if determined to be necessary to include, can be discussed further in the article's body.

Care should be taken in stating release dates. Many commercial gaming sites, such as GameSpot, IGN, and 1UP.com, supply accurate dates, as well as vendor sites such as Amazon.com or GameStop. Dates should be provided in the form September 13, 2006. They should not be linked.

Sites lacking exact information may list the game as being released on January 1 or December 31 of a given year, as to fit into a database format, though neither date is a likely video game release date. If other sources cannot confirm the day of the release, simply leave the release date as the year of release by using {{vgy|2024}}, which produces [[2024 in video gaming|2024]].

For unreleased games, vendor sites should not be used as verifiable sources since their date is likely based on their best estimate of when the game is to be out; always look for corroborating statements from reliable sources to confirm these dates. If no exact day is given, insert the year of release as {{vgy|2024}}. If a general timeframe ("first quarter", "early") or even month is provided, include this before the year, but do not link these terms (see date formatting in the Manual of Style). Avoid the use of seasonal estimate release dates ("winter", "summer") as these have different meanings in different parts of the world. If the game is announced but no release date is given, state this as [[TBA]]. Additionally, unreleased games should include the {{future game}} template at the start of the article to inform the reader that the game is yet unreleased. This template should be removed once the game is released in any part of the world.

Keep in mind that some publishers may advertise a "release date", while some may advertise an "in-store date", and some may advertise both. (See Metroid Prime 3: Corruption for an example of both.) Usually, but not always, the "release date" is the date on which the publisher ships the game to retailers, resulting in an in-store date of between one and three days later. In general, a video game article should use the official release date and not the in-store date, if two separate dates are announced.

Within the infobox, release dates should be provided using the {{vgrelease}} template. Even if this format is not used, do not use flag icons in the infobox, instead, state the region/country by name or by their 2 or 3-letter country codes.

If the game is available for multiple platforms, group release dates first by platform, then by country. Thus, a game that may come out for the Xbox 360 then later for the PlayStation 3, group all the Xbox 360 release dates under one heading, then all the PlayStation 3 releases under a second. If a remake is covered within the same article as its original game, further group release dates by original and remakes, then by console, then by country.

Should the number of consoles or remakes become excessively large, consider stating only the first release or primary console within the infobox and summarizing the other release dates within the article body.

Organization

Here are a few ideas for how to organize articles. These do not necessarily have to correspond to the actual section headers and divisions, and they are no more than suggestions. Do not try to conform to them if they are not helping to improve the article.

For games:

  • Lead section: The name of the game in bold italics, release date, platform, and other identifying information go first. Then, a brief summary of the article. Finally, why the game is notable and important; this is the key part of the lead section, because it establishes the main idea that will be carried throughout the article.
  • Infobox: see below for more information.
  • Gameplay: going over the significant parts of how the game works. Remember not to include player's guide or walkthrough material.
  • Plot: if the plot is not too complex, it can be lumped in with the gameplay; otherwise, put it in its own section. If necessary, the section should have subheadings for the story's setting, characters, and story. Avoid trivial details.
  • History: discuss development, release, impact, critical acclaim, etc. This can easily be several different sections.
  • Trivia: Such information should be integrated into appropriate areas of the article.
  • External links and references. Cite sources! If you are unsure what to include for references, game instruction booklets, guides, reviews, and interviews are all good candidates.

For characters:

  • Lead section: The name of the character or series (if a group of characters) in bold italics, name of the company and/or designers that developed them, and other identifying information go first. Then, a brief summary of the article. Finally, why the character(s) is notable and important; this is the key part of the lead section, because it establishes the main idea that will be carried throughout the article.
  • Infobox: Articles on a single character should have a character infobox. Articles on a group of characters should have an infobox omitted.
  • Concept and design: going over the process in which the character(s) was created and designed.
  • Appearances: This should list any games or related media that the character appeared in and briefly discuss their role in the game. This section should normally be integrated into the rest of the character section if in a list or article on a group of characters.
  • Merchandise: This section should be included if the likeness of the character(s) has been used extensively on merchandise and marketing material. Types of merchandise should be include and if possible release dates and regions of the merchandise
  • Reception: This should detail how the character(s) was received by critics. Criticism about the game itself should generally be omitted as the character(s) is the subject of the article.
  • Trivia: Such information should be integrated into appropriate areas of the article.
  • External links and references. Cite sources! If you are unsure what to include for references, game instruction booklets, guides, reviews, and interviews are all good candidates.

For settings:

  • Lead section: The name of the setting or fictional world in bold italics, name of the company and/or designers that developed them, and other identifying information go first. Then, a brief summary of the article. Finally, why the setting is notable and important; this is the key part of the lead section, because it establishes the main idea that will be carried throughout the article.
  • Infobox: Most articles on a setting should have an infobox omitted. There are exceptions though.
  • Concept and design: going over the process in which the setting was created and designed.
  • In-game content: This should section should be include information about the setting as it applies to the game. Briefly discuss the role in the game and any aspects of the in-game world that is notable and/or an important fact to the game. This section should not contain excessive detail about the game's plot, descriptions about the setting, or game guide information.
  • Reception: This should detail how the setting or aspects of the setting were received by critics. Criticism about the game itself should generally be omitted as the setting is the subject of the article.
  • Trivia: Such information should be integrated into appropriate areas of the article.
  • External links and references. Cite sources! If you are unsure what to include for references, game instruction booklets, guides, reviews, and interviews are all good candidates.

Other guidelines

As per a very lengthy debate, full names should be used for video game character article namespaces when they appear in-game. Otherwise the common name should be used.

Example articles


Featured Content on Wikipedia is content that Wikipedia editors believe are the best in the encyclopedia, and the status which all content should eventually achieve. Content includes articles, lists, topics, and pictures. Before being listed here, content is reviewed at a process like Wikipedia:Featured article candidates and Wikipedia:Featured list candidates for accuracy, neutrality, completeness, and style according to quality criteria. Bold article names have been featured on the Main Page as "Today's featured article", "Today's featured list", or the like.

The top of the page lists content that is under review, either to obtain or keep a Featured quality rating.

Articles (games)
Articles (other)
Lists (games)
Lists (other)






Content under review

Featured articles

Individual games
  1. 1080° Snowboarding
  2. Alleyway
  3. Anachronox
  4. Aquaria
  5. Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts
  6. Bastion
  7. Batman: Arkham Asylum
  8. Batman: Arkham City
  9. The Beatles: Rock Band
  10. BioShock
  11. BioShock 2
  12. BioShock 2: Minerva's Den
  13. Blast Corps
  14. Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars
  15. Burning Rangers
  16. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
  17. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered
  18. Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow
  19. Castlevania: Dawn of Sorrow
  20. Cave Story
  21. Children of Mana
  22. Chrono Trigger
  23. Cloud
  24. Crush
  25. Colossal Cave Adventure
  26. Commander Keen in Invasion of the Vorticons
  27. Computer Space
  28. Conan (2007)
  29. Crackdown
  30. The Dark Pictures Anthology: House of Ashes
  31. Daytona USA
  32. Deathrow
  33. Defense of the Ancients
  34. Devil May Cry
  35. Dishonored
  36. Donkey Kong 64
  37. Donkey Kong Country
  38. Donkey Kong Land
  39. Doom (1993)
  40. Doom (2016)
  41. Drakengard
  42. Drowned God
  43. Dungeon Siege
  44. The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind
  45. The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
  46. Empires: Dawn of the Modern World
  47. F-Zero GX
  48. Fallout
  49. Fallout 4: Far Harbor
  50. Fez
  51. Final Fantasy VI
  52. Final Fantasy VII
  53. Final Fantasy VIII
  54. Final Fantasy IX
  55. Final Fantasy X
  56. Final Fantasy X-2
  57. Final Fantasy XI
  58. Final Fantasy XII
  59. Final Fantasy XIII
  60. Final Fantasy XIII-2
  61. Final Fantasy Tactics
  62. Final Fantasy Type-0
  63. Five Nights at Freddy's
  64. Flight Unlimited
  65. Flight Unlimited II
  66. Flight Unlimited III
  67. Flotilla
  68. Flow
  69. Flower
  70. Freedom Planet
  71. Giants: Citizen Kabuto
  72. God of War (2005)
  73. God of War II
  74. God of War III
  75. God of War: Ascension
  76. God of War: Betrayal
  77. God of War: Chains of Olympus
  78. God of War: Ghost of Sparta
  79. Golden Sun
  80. Grand Theft Auto V
  81. Gravity Bone
  82. Grim Fandango
  83. Guitar Hero
  84. Half-Life 2: Episode One
  85. Half-Life 2: Lost Coast
  86. Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary
  87. Halo 2
  88. Halo 3
  89. Halo 3: ODST
  90. Halo: Reach
  91. Halo Wars
  92. Homeworld
  93. Ico
  94. Infinity Blade
  95. Iridion 3D
  96. Islanders
  97. Islands: Non-Places
  98. Journey (2012)
  99. Jumping Flash!
  100. Katamari Damacy
  101. Katana Zero
  102. Killer7
  103. Killer Instinct Gold
  104. Kingdom Hearts
  105. Kingdom Hearts II
  106. Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories
  107. Kingdom Two Crowns
  108. Knight Lore
  109. Knuckles' Chaotix
  110. The Last of Us
  111. League of Legends
  112. Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver
  113. Lego Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy
  114. The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening
  115. The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask
  116. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
  117. The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons and Oracle of Ages
  118. Limbo
  119. The Longing
  120. The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II
  121. Lost Luggage
  122. Maniac Mansion
  123. Marble Madness
  124. Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games
  125. Mario Power Tennis
  126. Mass Effect 2
  127. Metroid Prime
  128. Metroid Prime 2: Echoes
  129. Metroid Prime 3: Corruption
  130. Midtown Madness
  131. Mischief Makers
  132. Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine
  133. Myst
  134. Myst III: Exile
  135. Myst IV: Revelation
  136. Myst V: End of Ages
  137. New Super Mario Bros.
  138. Nights into Dreams
  139. Nights: Journey of Dreams
  140. Ninja Gaiden (NES)
  141. Ōkami
  142. OneShot
  143. Oxenfree
  144. Panzer Dragoon Saga
  145. Paper Mario: Color Splash
  146. Paper Mario: The Origami King
  147. Pathways into Darkness
  148. Perfect Dark
  149. Phantasmagoria
  150. Pirates of the Caribbean: Armada of the Damned
  151. Planescape: Torment
  152. Plants vs. Zombies
  153. Pokémon Channel
  154. Populous: The Beginning
  155. Portal
  156. Proteus
  157. Radical Dreamers
  158. Resident Evil 2
  159. Resident Evil 5
  160. Riven
  161. Sabre Wulf
  162. Sacrifice
  163. Sam & Max: Freelance Police
  164. Secret of Mana
  165. Shadow of the Colossus
  166. Shadow the Hedgehog
  167. Shovel Knight Showdown
  168. Silent Hill 4: The Room
  169. The Simpsons Game
  170. The Simpsons: Hit & Run
  171. Sinistar: Unleashed
  172. Sonic the Hedgehog 2
  173. Sonic the Hedgehog (2006)
  174. Sonic Adventure
  175. Sonic Spinball
  176. Sonic X-treme
  177. Sonic: After the Sequel
  178. South Park: The Stick of Truth
  179. Space Invaders
  180. Spacewar!
  181. Spider-Man (2018)
  182. Spyro: Year of the Dragon
  183. Star Control 3
  184. Star Wars Episode I: Battle for Naboo
  185. Star Wars: Rogue Squadron
  186. StarCraft: Ghost
  187. Super Columbine Massacre RPG!
  188. Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels
  189. Super Mario 64
  190. Super Mario Galaxy
  191. Super Mario World
  192. Super Meat Boy
  193. Super Smash Bros. Brawl
  194. Super Smash Bros. Melee
  195. System Shock
  196. System Shock 2
  197. Tales of Monkey Island
  198. Tatsunoko vs. Capcom: Ultimate All-Stars
  199. Terra Nova: Strike Force Centauri
  200. Thief II
  201. Thirty Flights of Loving
  202. Tony Hawk's Underground
  203. Trials of Mana
  204. Tunic
  205. Turok: Dinosaur Hunter
  206. Ultima Underworld: The Stygian Abyss
  207. Untitled Goose Game
  208. Uru: Ages Beyond Myst
  209. Vagrant Story
  210. Vampire: The Masquerade – Redemption
  211. Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines
  212. Wii Sports
  213. Wipeout 2048
  214. Wipeout 3
  215. Wolfenstein 3D
  216. The World Ends with You
  217. Zero Escape: Virtue's Last Reward
  218. Zork
Game series and collections
Systems and accessories
Characters
Industry and development
Other related

Featured lists

Lists of games and media by series
Lists of games by company
Lists of games by system
Accolades and awards
Characters
Music
Other related

Featured topics

Topics


Featured pictures

Consoles
Games
Other


Footnotes

  1. ^ Esquire, February 1981
  2. ^ Bramwell, Tom (2007-05-15). "Portal: First Impressions". Eurogamer. Retrieved 2007-10-05. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ Riyad Emeran (2007-03-23). "Sony PlayStation 3". Trustedreviews.com. Retrieved 2007-07-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)