Holy Grave Provosty Droyssig

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bartholomäus Church in Droyzut

The Holy Grave Propstei Droyssig was a branch of the Chapter of the Canons of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem ( Fratres Cruciferorum Ordinis Canonicorum Regul. Custodum SS. Sepulchri Hierosolymitani cum duplici rubea Cruce ) in Droyssig in Burgenlandkreis ( Saxony-Anhalt ). In the older literature the settlement is often wrongly ascribed to the Templar order . The provost of the Canons of the Holy Sepulcher in Droyßig was created around / before 1214 and was incorporated into the Order of St. John in 1495. In 1588 the Johanniter sold the Kommende Droyzut (or also the Johanniterkommende Droy says ) to the von Bünau family for an annual interest.

location

No building remains of the original settlement of the Canons of the Holy Sepulcher have survived. Even the exact location is uncertain. It must have been on the area of ​​the Droyzut elementary school, in the Schulstrasse area. Today's temple gate, which was probably built in the 17th century, marks the entrance to the so-called temple courtyard , which emerged from the residence of the canons of the Holy Sepulcher.

history

Around / before 1214 Albert von Droyßig (or Albrecht von Turts) and his wife gave the Canon Monastery of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem (Leitloff also calls them Sepulchriten / Sepulchriner) a farm (or a house) in Droyßig, and the patronage and all associated goods the local Bartholomäuskirche. Since some goods were not owned by Albert von Droyzut, but rather imperial fiefs, confirmation by Emperor Friedrich II took place on March 16, 1215. He also granted the brothers the right to accept further foundations of imperial property without his consent. An inscription stone that was located in the Droyßiger Bartholomäuskirche bore the inscription in poetry:

“ When
the year was 1213 after the birth of Christ,
Mr. Albrecht Graff zu Orlamund
and his husband Frav Kunigund founded
the Tempelhoff in
honor of the Order of the Holy Trench.
Also here gave the parish,
as the foundation clearly says
that Emperor Frederick approve
vigorously confirm with writings,
He was a gentleman from Swabia
and was called the other;
But remained patrons to allerdstund
Messrs Count to Orlamund,
Till last by this strain
shield, helmet took with him to the grave
since made war then, Zweiffels is ohn,
the the protection of Bünau,
The but from their community
came last to the by Treben alone.
And although the Order of St. John has been at a
hard dispute with them,
Such an error is also compared,
The order deviated amicably,
And that of Bünau to a large extent
Der Tempelhoff left hereditary,
as in (15) 88. Year
The arbitration in Leipzig says clearly. "

- Voigt, Messrs. Von Bünau, pp. 155/56.

It is quite conceivable that this inscription stone, although attached much later, definitely indicates the year of the foundation. However, it contains some errors. Albert von Droyßig was not Count of Orlamünde, and the name of Albrecht von Droyzut's wife is not known (and should not have been known at the time the inscription was made).

In the document of Emperor Friedrich II it is very clearly stated Dominico sepulchro (= holy grave), but this court was almost always attributed to the Templars, especially in 19th century literature. This is where the term Tempelhof, so-called several times, for this settlement comes from, which was still in use after the Reformation. The Templars definitely had no property in Droyssig. In the following, the naturalized term Tempelhof will therefore continue to be used.

Half a year earlier (1214) Frederick II had given the canons of the Holy Sepulcher in Dietbrück near Speyer the church in Kirchheim ( Kirchheimbolanden ) with the tithe and accessories ( Bolanden , Bischheim , Rittersheim , Morschheim and Orbis ). The Speyer priory was north of Speyer in Altspeyer and was subordinate to the Denkendorf monastery .

The Canons of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem

After the conquest of Jerusalem by the crusaders in 1099, Godfrey of Bouillon established a canon monastery at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. Initially it was secular clergy who were assigned houses in Jerusalem and an annual income. They performed services at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher and were given the right to elect the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, thus serving as the chapter of the Patriarchate of Jerusalem. In 1114 the monastery was reformed and the canons were obliged to live together in a monastery building by the Holy Sepulcher according to the rule of Augustine. Subsequently, this Augustinian canon and chapter of the Patriarchate of Jerusalem received numerous donations in the Holy Land, but also in Europe to secure its existence. It became one of the richest ecclesiastical institutions in the Holy Land, along with the three other canons in and around Jerusalem ( Canons on the Mount of Olives , Canons on the Templum Domini in Jerusalem and Canons on Mount Sion near Jerusalem ), the monasteries of S. Maria in the Josaphat Valley , S. Maria Latina and the monastery on Mount Thabor and various dioceses (e.g. Archdiocese of Nazareth , Diocese of Bethlehem ). The donations included not only property and interest in money and in kind, but also churches (and their income) and other monasteries. Daughter priories of the Canons of the Holy Sepulcher were established as early as the 12th and 13th centuries. Nevertheless, the older documents (mostly) never speak of an ordo , but of the chapter or the canons ( dominici S. Sepulcri , ecclesia S. Sepulcri or canonici S. Sepulcri ). There is also no book of statutes as is available from other orders (Johanniter, Templer and Lazariten) that were created during this period. The Canons of the Holy Sepulcher saw their task primarily in the election of the Patriarch and the service of the Holy Sepulcher Church in Jerusalem. The daughter priories had to pay the chapter in Jerusalem (from 1187 in Acre) an annual fee. In the case of the Denkendorf monastery, the provost Hugo had to give one gold mark annually in 1284. It was only with the spatial separation of chapter and patriarch (after 1291, loss of Acre) and the loss of the right to elect the patriarch - the Pope now assigned the title directly without the involvement of the chapter - did the development of a spiritual order begin real sense. Of all of the above-mentioned spiritual institutions in the Holy Land , only the Canons of the Holy Sepulcher managed to form their own order that would endure.

It is not clear where the canons of the Holy Sepulcher who settled in Droyzut originally came from. Kaspar Elm suspects, based on the visitation rights that the Denkendorf Monastery was entitled to in the late Middle Ages, that they probably came from southern Germany. A foundation of Miechów ( Powiat Miechowski , Lesser Poland Voivodeship , Poland), where the canons had received donations from the Holy Sepulcher in the 1160s, would also be possible . The Droyßig branch had a different legal position than the Speyer branch, for example, which was dependent on Denkendorf. The management of the Droyßiger branch by a provost suggests that the two religious houses have equal status. Therefore, a direct participation of a canon from the Holy Land, who may have accepted the donation, should also be considered. A comparable case is known from Haselnorf Monastery , which was subordinate to the Monastery of S. Maria Latina near Jerusalem. However, the provost's office in Droyßig never achieved the supra-regional importance that the Denkendorf monastery had (with priories in Speyer and the Netherlands) or the provost's office in Miechów.

Temple gate

The rule of Droy says

In the Middle Ages, the rule of Droyßig was a small aristocratic rule with its seat at the castle in Droy says. At that time it belonged to the Landgraviate of Thuringia and at the beginning of the 13th century was under the suzerainty of Landgrave Hermann I of Thuringia. Right from the start, the owners of the Droyanzig estate had the right to protect, protect and protect the Droyßig Holy Sepulcher. In 1213 Albert von Turts (or Albert von Droy says) was Lord of Droy says. In 1344 the rule of Droyßig passed into the possession of the Counts of Orlamünde .

In 1413 the Lords of Bünau came into the possession of the Droyanzig estate. When Leipzig divided the Electorate of Saxony (1485), the Holy Sepulcher Prostei and its dependencies came to the Albertine Duchy of Saxony, with the exception of Sautzschen, which belonged to the Naumburg Monastery.

In 1578 the von Bünau sold the rule Droyzut with over 20 villages to Christoph von Hoym. The exception was the Tempelhof in Droyssig and its branches, which the Treben line of the von Bünau family kept. Christoph von Hoym bequeathed the rule of Droyzut to his son Gebhard, who died unmarried in 1616. Christoph's brother, Christian Julius von Hoym, inherited the rule of Droy says. His descendants remained in the possession of the von Hoym family until 1769. Thereafter, until 1945, the rule of Droy says was owned by the princes of Schönburg-Waldenburg. However, this is irrelevant for the history of the Tempelhof in Droy says.

Coat of arms of the von Bünau at the temple gate in Droyßig. Heraldic shield: square - split into 1 and 4 in red and white, in 2 and 3 in red a golden lion head in frontal view, whose tongue is formed by a golden lily. Helmet: two spangle helmets, crest: left helmet, a golden crown, on it an open flight, right helmet, a red hat with a white brim, set with two golden rods, the ends of which are each set with three peacock feathers, blankets: left, red / White, right red / gold

The Droyßiger Tempelhof

All we know about the original foundation of Albert von Turts (or Droyßig) is that it included a house (or farm) in Droyßig, and the patronage and income of the Droyßiger Bartholomäuskirche. Even if the Templars definitely did not have any property in Droyssig, the term Tempelhof became common for the Droyssig branch. The Tempelhof was a walled manor with residential and farm buildings for the convent's own economy, located in Droyzut. Unfortunately, we do not find out anything in the deed of donation about the further extent of the possessions in and in the immediate vicinity of Droyzut. Hallway and place names in and near Droyzut, such as the temple pond and temple wood, indicate that the original donation must have been more extensive, or that it was increased by later donations or by active acquisitions by the provost. This is confirmed with a document from 1589, in which it says that after the establishment of the branch, several people donated something to the Tempelhof and that the provost and the local convent also bought something for the Tempelhof.

With the St. Bartholomew Church incorporated into the order and the parish belonging to it, their income was connected as well as the right of patronage. The Canons of the Holy Sepulcher also had to take care of the structural preservation of the church and the rectory, hold the services and take care of other church activities. It is very likely that a hospital was connected to the Tempelhof in Droyanzig, and the order had to take care of the sick. The hospital is mentioned until 1561.

The Ordenshof Utenbach

Probably in 1240, according to other sources in 1290, the canons of the Holy Sepulcher in Droyßig received the church in Utenbach (city of Apolda , district of Weimarer Land ) with their income from the taverns of Apolda . Here they also built a religious house. The Ordenshof in Utenbach apparently became so important for the Droyßiger settlement that in 1303 the canons called themselves Brothers of the Order of the Holy Sepulcher at Droyzk (Droyzut) and Otenbach (Utenbach) . In 1270 they bought 4½ Hufen arttland for the farm in Utenbach .

On July 6, 1303 Johannes, the provisional (in Utenbach) and the brothers from the Order of the Holy Sepulcher in Droyssig and Utenbach exchanged the fourth part of the mill in Wickerstete ( Wickerstedt near Apolda) with the monastery Heusdorf (near Apolda , district of Weimarer Land ) and interest against a hoof in Utenbach. The church in Utenbach had branches in Stobra , Stiebritz and Kösnitz . The canons of the Holy Sepulcher had grain interest and decienes from the three villages mentioned in an amount that was not exactly known. In Kösnitz, the canons of Heiligen Grab owned a house from which the Utenbach branch received hereditary interest. In addition, the pastor of Nerkewitz had to be partially entertained.

Leitloff assumes that the branch in Utenbach will have a comparatively independent position from the parent company Droyzut . However, due to the lack of documents, this cannot be proven. No prior is mentioned, a common title in the Order of Canons of the Holy Sepulcher for a dependent settlement. The head of Utenbach is only referred to as a provisional in 1303 . Leitloff also referred to the branch as Commende Utenbach after the takeover by Johanniter . There is no documentary evidence for this construct either. On the contrary, in 1498 and 1501 Utenbach had the status of a membrum (or member) of the Coming Droyssig. In 1501 it is reported that the commander Johannes Rösner transferred the previous provost (and after the takeover by the Johanniter Prior) Blasius Mey to the Utenbach estate .

The branch in Utenbach consisted of a residential building, farm buildings, garden and farmland. It is not known whether the friars cultivated the arable land themselves or whether it was leased.

According to the visitation protocol of the monasteries and Comthureia of Thuringia from 1535 , the religious houses in Droyßig and Utenbach each had one inmate. This is partly contradicted by a later report, according to which the last four conventuals in Droyanzig converted to Protestantism in 1539. For Utenbach, the number could be right, but it doesn't have to be.

The Tempelhof in Deumen

Before the possession in Utenbach, the canons in Droyßig had already received 10½ hooves field and 2 acres of meadow near Deumen (devastated near Hohenmölsen). The estate there was apparently also called the Tempelhof or the Tempelgut . It is not known whether this farm was managed, supervised or administered by a friar, or whether it was leased.

Deumen belonged to the office of Weißenfels of the Electorate of Saxony until 1815 and from 1806 to the Kingdom of Saxony. The Tempelhof was the large, walled estate to the west of the town center marked on the topographic map from 1918. The manor Deumen had a size of 118.67 hectares in 1907. The place was devastated in 2000/02 and will soon be dredged by the Profen opencast mine (or has it already been dredged?).

The farm (or the house) in Zeitz

In 1295, Bishop Bruno von Naumburg gave the convent in Droyzut a house (or courtyard) and a garden in Zeitz . However, they had to undertake not to build a religious house in Zeitz, not to enlarge the property and not to build a chapel on the area. Interestingly, in this document the head of the Droyßiger convent is named Johannes commendator , a term that otherwise only occurs in the order of knights. From this term, which was only used once, it is not tenable in view of the later documents. In 1408 the provost and convent in Droyssig sold this property for 12 guilders annual interest, to whom is not noted.

The order in Sautzschen

In 1325, Bishop Heinrich von Naumburg gave the Droyßiger Propstei an estate in Sautzschen (Gem. Wetterzeube ) near Zeitz. According to Zergiebel, it comprised four Hufen of land, a field of wood and three loads of hay. It was also called the temple property . It is said to have belonged to the Tempelhof in Droyßig as late as 1560 . Here, too, it is not known whether this farm was cultivated, supervised or administered by a friar, or whether it was leased. Leitloff assumes, however, that there was once a religious house in Sautzschen. But he could not provide any further details. Before the Reformation, Sautzschen was in the area of ​​the Naumburg Abbey.

In the topographic map 1: 25.0000 sheet Zeitz from 1908, the Probsteiholz (sic!) Is recorded southwest of the town center . It could also be a reference to the earlier wood of the Holy Sepulcher Prostei Droyzut. In the 18th century Sautzschen was a whole Vorwerk that belonged to the domain Haynburg in the Haynsburg office .

The church patronage in Priesteblich and Meineweh

The Holy Sepulcher Propstei also had the church patronage in Priesteblich (city of Markranstädt, district of Leipzig ). The jurisdiction over the place, however, belonged to that of Bünau.

After the school and church visits of 1539/40, the Templars of Droyßig still had patronage over the church of Meineweh ( Burgenlandkreis ). It is not known whether this was already the case at the time of the Provost of the Canon of the Holy Sepulcher, but it is probable.

The hospital in Grimma

In 1356 the Propstei Droyzut came into the possession of the Heilig Geist Hospital in Grimma . According to Virchow, however, the hospital had existed since 1241. In 1309, it had to give the Nimbschen monastery an annual interest rate of 3½ fours. The hospital in Grimma was on Köhlerstrasse and the corner of Töpfergasse.

In the 15th century the hospital received a donation from a Herr von Hirschfeld zu Otterwisch . In 1515 the heads of the hospital asserted that they had previously bought a meadow in Borensdorf , which the council claimed was the property of the city.

On February 24, 1440, Johannes Knorre, hospital master in Grimma and brother of the provost in Droyssig, awarded the Augustinian monastery in Grimma wood in the Undorf, which Heyncze Kelner had given up to the hospital, for an annual interest of 8 groschen and two capes.

In 1478 there was a dispute over this wood between the Propstei Droyzut and the Augustinian Hermitage in Grimma, which the Saxon Electress Margarethe had her Altenburg bailiff Hans Metzsch arbitrated.

On May 6, 1493, the hospital master of the Heilig Geist Hospital in Grimma, Johannes Bretsneider , enfeoffed the Augustinian hermits in Grimma again with the forest in the Undorf.

On June 23, 1496, Nikolaus Anderßlouben, spittelmeister of the hospital zu Grymme ordenns sancti Iohannis des touffers Cristi enfeoffed the Augustinian hermits in Grimma with a piece of wood in the Undorf, which they had bought from Hanns Dragis, citizen of Grimma for 65 guilders. The Augustinians were supposed to own it as their own inheritance and for it a year interest on Michaelis 20 groschen and three Kaphähne.

Hospital master

The hospital in Grimma was run by a hospital master. It is not clear whether he was (always) a friar. At least Johannes Knorre, mentioned in 1440, was a brother of Drowsyck des ordins of the holy grave in Jerusalem. The following are known by name of the hospital masters:

  • 1379 Eghard (Echart)
  • 1419 Ulrich
  • 1440 Johannes Knorre
  • 1493 Johannes Bretsneider
  • 1496 Nicolaus Anderslouben
  • 1519 to 1522 Matthias Lobesaher, gave up the management in 1522 and moved away from Droyßig.
  • 1522 to 1530 Wolfgang von Zeschau

In 1535, the six convent brothers at the time, Georigius Lutz, Provost, Georigius Staub, Valenti Waltz, Johan Fischer, Johann Spyegell and Conrad Schuffelann, handed over the hospital in Grimma to the mayor council of the city of Grimma for 99 years in return for a one-off payment of 100 guilders and an annual interest of 5 guilders.

Incorporation of the Droyanzig provost in the Order of St. John

With the bull Cum solerti meditatione pensamus of March 28, 1489, Pope Innocent VIII abolished several smaller orders, including the Order of Lazarus and the Order of Sepulcrit (= Canons of the Holy Sepulcher) and united them with the Order of St. John.

The commander of the Johanniterkommenden Wiesenfeld and Wildungen Johann Rösner was entrusted with the incorporation of the Lazaritenkommenden Gotha , Breitenbich , Braunsroda and Wackenhausen as well as Sangerhausen . However, the incorporation of the lazarite houses was associated with a time delay before the papal bull was proclaimed. In 1519 Johann Rösner wrote that the Kommende Gotha had passed to the Johanniter 27 years ago (i.e. 1492). After the successful incorporation of the Lazarite comers, he was evidently commissioned with the incorporation of the Holy Sepulcher Propstei Droyssig.

In the case of the Holy Sepulcher Propstei, the takeover and incorporation into the Order of St. John took place even later. On May 6, 1493, Johannes Bretschneider, head of the hospital in Grimma, belonging to the order of the holy grave in Jerusalem, enfeoffed the Augustinian convent in Grimma with a piece of wood in the Undorf that the Augustinians from Barthel Fleischhammer had bought for 34 Rhenish guilders and eight groschen and earned four groschen and two cape cocks annually. In 1494, Blasienn probiste zew Droissgk an and Guntern vonn Bunaww Amptmann zw Friburgk made a settlement. The use of the title Probst indicates relatively clearly that the Holy Grave Provosty Droyssig was not yet incorporated in the Order of St. John in 1493/94, because in the Order of St. John the titles Commendator for the knightly ruler and Prior for the head of the priestly brothers were common.

The successor to Johann Bretschneider in the office of hospital master in Grimma was Nikolaus Anderslöben. In a document from 1496 he enfeoffed the Augustinian hermits in Grimma with the wood in Undorf. He now called himself Nikolaus Anderßlouben spittelmeister of the hospital in Grymme ordenns sancti Iohannis des touffers Cristi. A year later (1497) Blasius Meye, now called Prior, complained that the legacy of the hospital master Johann Bretschneider, who died in 1496, had been sold without his knowledge, to which the branch in Droyzut was entitled. The title of Prior belonged to the head of the priestly brothers of a Johanniterkommende. The incorporation of the Holy Sepulcher Propstei in the Order of St. John took place between 1494 and 1496. According to Ralph Leitloff, the provost Blasius Mey zu Doyssig is said to have replaced the double red patriarchal cross on clothing with the simple White Johanniter Creutz in 1495 and thus externally showed the transition to the Order of St. John.

The independence of the Order of Canons of the Holy Sepulcher was at least partially restored at the request of Emperor Maximilian I and Duke Eberhard II of Württemberg , and with a bull from Pope Alexander VI. confirmed again on January 15, 1499. However, in Germany this only affected the Denkendorf monastery, as well as the Polish and Silesian religious houses, and the religious houses in Aragon. The religious houses in Italy were not returned. The Holy Sepulcher Provosty remained in the hands of the Johanniter.

The commander in office at the time, von Droyßig, is first mentioned by name in a document from 1507 and then again in 1518. It was commander of the (original) Johanniterkommenden Wildungen and Wiesenfeld, and probably also the commander in Weißensee and Schleusingen. He was also commissioned to incorporate the former comers of the Lazarite Order into the Order of St. John. While the Canons of the Holy Sepulcher reigned in the order, there were no known conflicts with the owners of the Droyssig rule as patrons of the provost, but the first discrepancies began to appear at the beginning of the 16th century. Günter von Bünau complained about the change of religious affiliation, because he feared disadvantages through the incorporation into the Order of St. John. He was certainly aware that everyone who came from the Johanniter had to pay so-called response funds to the order's headquarters, which was then still in Rhodes. In 1507 Johannes Rösner assured Günter von Bünau that everything would stay the same and would not bring any disadvantages to anyone.

In 1518 the great prior of the Johanniter in the order province of Alemannia Johann von Hattstein appointed the prior of the priest brothers Heinrich Neumeister commendator of the commander Droyssig. He thanked the previous commander Johannes Rösner, who had resigned for reasons of age. In 1518, Peter Klopstein, a new commander, was appointed to Gotha. Of course, Peter Klopstein had already been Johannes Rösner's deputy in Gotha before 1518.

The Coming Droyzut during and after the Reformation

In 1518, the Grand Prior of the Johanniter in Germany, Johannes von Hattstein, appointed Heinrich Neumeister, the previous Prior of the Brothers Priest of the Coming Droyssig, as commander. The convent then became significantly smaller within a few years. In 1533 there were six brothers, in 1535 only five brothers ( conventualis brothers ). The head of the small convent now called himself provost again (1535), and the visitation protocols from 1539/40 also name the head of the order house Droyziger Propst and the Propstei branch. Due to the renewed nomination of a provost, Schlesinger thought it possible that the Order of St. John could not prevail at the beginning of the 16th century, but this is not the case.

The parent in Droyßig was located after the Leipzig division of the Electorate axes (1485), in Albertine part Saxony. The lord of the Albertine Saxon Duke Georg the Bearded was opposed to the Reformation, so that initially there was no danger that the Droyßig religious house would be secularized. In 1534 the provost (!) George Lutz even asked the von Bünau as patron saint of the Droyßiger for support against Duke Georg and Elector Johann Friedrich I , lord of Ernestine Saxony. Through a comparison between George the Bearded and Johann Friedrich, the Kommende Droyssig and the villages of Stobra, Stüberitz and Kosnitz, which belong to the Utenbach monastery and are now in the Ernestine area, and their income were withdrawn. The religious house had been prevented for eight years (introduction of the Reformation in 1527 in Ernestine Saxony) from collecting the corresponding taxes. The house in Kosnitz was transferred to the local virgin monastery (probably Heusdorf monastery ). So far, the order had endured this with patience, but now it could no longer be accepted, since after all the friars in Droyssig and Utenbach had to be looked after and this was no longer possible at this expensive time. The provost suggested that they should be assigned the two villages of Großromstedt and Kleinromstedt with the corresponding income as a replacement , but also with the obligation to perform worship there. The two villages, previously branches of Kapellendorf, are lacking spiritual support due to Kapellendorf's turn to Protestantism. In addition, the provost demanded the surrender of the house in Kosnitz and compensation for the previously lost income. Günther and Heinrich von Bünau complied with the provost's request and wrote a corresponding petition to the Duke of Saxony. The answer, however, has not been passed down.

From 1539, after the death of Duke George the Bearded and Duke Heinrich's accession to power , the Reformation also became generally accepted in Albertine Saxony. School and church visits were carried out as early as 1539 and then in the following year. In 1539/40 the Johanniterkommende Droyzut had four brothers. They are said to have converted to Protestantism in 1539. The last provost Georgius Lutz became pastor in Droyssig.

After the school and church visits of 1539/40, the Templars of Droyßig still had patronage over the church of Meineweh . and the patronage in Priestäblich ( Probst zu Droyssig ). The temple courtyards in Deumen, Sautzschen and Utenbach were apparently still in the possession of the Droyßiger order house.

Around 1541 Rudolf von Bünau, the administrator, patron and patron of the Tempelhof, bought the Treben manor and moved his residence from Droyssig to Treben. He founded the so-called Treben line of von Bünau.

The end of the Coming Droyssig

In 1547 the Ernestine Elector Johann Friedrich I was at the head of the Protestant Schmalkaldic League. As early as 1546, Emperor Charles V imposed imperial ban on him and the other leaders of the Schmalkaldic League. The emperor marched into Kursachsen in spring 1547 and remained victorious in the battle of Mühlberg . Johann Friedrich was captured and initially sentenced to death. He was pardoned, but lost the electoral dignity and a large part of his territory to the Albertine Duke of Saxony Moritz . Droyanzig now belonged again to the (now Albertine) Electorate of Saxony. With the Wittenberg surrender (1547), the Dornburg office , to which Utenbach belonged, came to the Ernestine, now only Duchy of Saxony.

In 1551, the newly installed receptor of the Order of St. John for Upper Germany and commander of the Tobel and Würzburg order houses Adam von Schwalbach visited the St. Johns Coming Droyssig. He must have immediately recognized the danger of the secularization of the Droyßig branch. He concluded the following settlement with von Bünau as patron and patron:

  • The provost (or Kommendatot) of the Droyssig branch is to be replaced by a clergyman from the members of the Droyssig or Utenbach houses, and no longer necessarily by an outsider.
  • The appointment should be made in agreement between von Bünau and the order, especially if it should be an outsider
  • Should the supervisor be a wasteful, incompetent or naughty , the von Bünau would have the right to depose him and replace him with a competent person they like
  • The new head should be a member of the Protestant religion or at least be knowledgeable
  • the order should not impose on the ruler what is not in use and in practice in the Electorate of Saxony
  • the repos from Droyanzig and Utenbach in the amount of 5 guilders and 2 guilders remained at this level and may not be increased.
  • The order should ensure that the two houses remain exempt from imperial taxes,

In 1557 the previous provost (or administrator) Kilian Walter (or Christian Walner?) Died and the then Grand Prior of the Johanniter in the order province of Alemannia Georg von Hohenheim appointed in consensus with the von Bünau Johann Bertram the Younger temporary administrator of the two houses Droyßig and Utenbach. This was at least until 1561 administrator.

He was followed by the Protestant Provost of Merseburg, Rudolf von Bünau, who was administrator of the two religious houses Droyssig and Utenbach until his death in 1577. After that, his stepmother took possession of the Tempelhof under questionable circumstances. She died on May 15, 1578. At the request of the elector and with his confirmation, and with the consent of the other von Bünau's heirs, Heinrich von Bünau and his sons were appointed administrators of the Tempelhof in Droyßig. The Order of St. John was simply ignored.

In 1578 the von Bünau sold the rule Droyzut to the von Hoym. The only exception was the Tempelhof in Droyssig, which the von Bünau kept. This created two judicial and legal districts in the city of Droyzut, which were separated from each other by the temple gate . Today's gate is more recent and, according to the year on the coat of arms of von Bünau, comes from 1642. The temple gate, however, had a predecessor, which is already mentioned in the 1578 sales contract.

In 1578 Grand Prior Philipp Flach von Schwarzenberg appointed the commander of Rothenburg ob der Tauber Valentin von und zu der Heese as the new commander of Droyssig and his membrum Utenbach, contrary to the comparison of 1551 and now without consulting the von Bünau . Valentin von und zu der Heese went to Drossig to take possession of his wife. But this was forbidden to him by the governor of the Weißenfels office ; Valentin von und zu der Heese had to leave without having achieved anything. Philipp Flach von Schwarzenberg first turned to Heinrich von Bünau and asked for Valention from and to der Heese to be instructed in his comrades, who hesitantly rejected him with reference to old contracts, advice within the family and clarification of the legal situation. Thereupon Philipp Flach von Schwarzenberg turned directly to the Saxon Elector August in 1581 with the request to instruct Valentin from and to the Heese in the Kommende Droy says. At first August did not react at all, a reply is only known from 1583. He was not responsible for the Membrum Utenbach, and in the case of the Droyßiger Tempelhof, the elector stated that the proceeds of the latter had been donated solely to the performance of church services and to entertain the priests. However, he did not want to make a final decision yet, but wanted to give everyone involved and knowledgeable people the opportunity to express their opinion.

It was only under his successor Christian I that the order's request to instruct Valtentin from and to the Heese in the Kommende Droy says was rejected. The Saxon state government expressed doubts about the loyalty of the order, the better-founded rights of those of Bünau and the fear that the endangered care of the clergy through the transfer of the response funds to the order's headquarters and the maintenance costs for the commander. The Order's reaction to the decision is unknown, but it can be assumed that it threatened legal action. With the mediation of two Saxon chief court judges, the Order and the von Bünau reached a settlement. The order ceded the Tempelhof and its pertinence and all claims to the von Bünau. The von Bünau gave an annual rent of 50 guilders.

The fate of the Deumen and Sautzschen Ordenshöfe after the introduction of the Reformation

The Ordenshof in Deumen was already leased to Heinrich von Bünau in 1552. In 1552 he had a loan register created in Deumen and asked the residents to do the provost's normal duties and responsibilities . The von Bünau came into full ownership of the court in Deumen through the above-mentioned settlement of 1588 and the agreed annual rent of 50 guilders for the Tempelhof.

The Sautzschen estate belonging to the Tempelhof Droyßig was managed by Johann Bertram the Elder around 1550. He was Schosser (tax collector) and clerk for the von Bünau family. Apparently he sought to the order to give him the property hereditary or to enfeoff him with it. He offered the commander in Schleusingen and Weißensee financial allowances and a horse in case they would work for him with the grand prior. However, the order did not respond to this suggestion, which was certainly not discussed with that of Bünau. Johann Bertram the Elder died in 1559. His son Johann Bertram the Younger was appointed administrator of the Tempelhof in Droyßig in 1557. Heinrich von Bünau had learned that the late shooter Johann Bertram the Elder is said to have still owned numerous letters that were supposed to concern the Tempelhof with its pertinence. He asked the heirs, Johannes Bertram the younger and the daughter who was married to Abraham Körner, to inspect the papers and insured that they would be returned after the sighting. In this context, Abraham Körner demanded that the Sautzschen estate be granted to him on the grounds that his father-in-law had inherited the Sautzschen estate from the Order of St. John. Johannes Bertram the Younger does not seem to have supported this demand, however, as he was the administrator of the temple court. After viewing the papers, Heinrich von Bünau only returned part of them on the grounds that there were no documents of relevance to the beneficiaries, otherwise he rejected the request for admission to the Sautzschen estate. The conflict between von Bünau and Körner was preprogrammed. Abraham Körner turned to the Saxon elector for support. It is not known how the dispute was finally decided by the elector. However, it can be assumed that the decision in favor of Abraham Körner turned out negative, because he and his family had to vacate the Sautzschen estate in 1561. The Sautzschen estate remained in the direct possession of von Bünau and was inherited and peculiarly left to Heinrich the Elder of Bünau on Treben by the Order of St. John in exchange for an annual lease fee of 50 guilders.

The Ordenshof Utenbach after the Wittenberg surrender in 1547

The Membrum Utenbach near Apolda took a completely different story . It belonged to the Dornburg office, which also fell to the Albertine Duchy of Saxony when Leipzig was divided in 1485. However, some villages, in which the Canons of the Holy Sepulcher had grain interest and tithe, belonged to the Ernestine part of the country. After the battle of Mühlberg and the Wittenberg surrender of 1547, the offices of Dornburg and Camburg came to the Ernestine Saxony as part of an exchange of territory. In 1572 there was another division of the estate, in which Utenbach came to the Duchy of Saxony-Weimar; but that was basically no longer important.

In the middle of the 16th century the Order of St. John, in consensus with the von Bünau and the Ernestine sovereign, appointed Pastor Heinrich Schuppe as head of the Utenbach House of Order. At first he seems to have fulfilled his tasks to everyone's satisfaction. In the spring of 1561 he beat his girlfriend brown and blue and was punished by the shooter in Dornburg. Heinrich von Bünau the Elder complained about this on the grounds that punitive measures against the owner of the Ordenshof Utenbach and Pastor Schuppe were only due to him as guardian. Apparently the shooter did not react, but invited Pastor Schuppe to his house in Dornburg and had him arrested afterwards. Schuppe was held captive in the tower for eight days and then chained for fifteen days. He was only to be released again when he would vacate the order's court and cede it to Duke Johann Friedrich. He was finally released after a 200 guld bail was given. However, he was soon released and prohibited from preaching. The order's court was thus effectively withdrawn and passed into sovereign property.

Understandably, this approach triggered a lengthy dispute between von Bünau and the state authorities of Ernestine Saxony, in which the sovereigns were later also included. After lengthy negotiations and discussions, von Bünau's complaints were rejected. A compensation payment was agreed in 1573 only for the pastor's office in Nerkewitz. She received 10 Scheuer wheat, 12 Scheuer peas, 6 Scheuer rye, 3 Malter oats, 18 buckets of wheat and two lamb bellies from the Utenbach estate.

The Tempelhof after the sale to the von Bünau

As security for the payment of the lease, the Order of St. John was granted the right to depose the von Bünausch manager in Sautzschen in the event of a delay in the lease and to employ one of its members until the outstanding lease including interest has been paid. The order also assured itself the right to hold harmless to the other pertinances of the Tempelhof in the event of lease arrears.

The von Bünau brought the Tempelhof into a foundation in 1589. The right of patronage should be shared among all male members of the family. One of the family should be the administrator; he should get the Tempelhof together with the pertinence for use. In return, he had to pay for the wages of the church and school servants and to pay the leases for the order. In addition, the administrator should pay 50 florins for each student from the von Bünausch family as a scholarship and also 10 florins for a widow of the von Bünausch family. In any case, in 1615/16 the Tempelhof belonged to a Heinrich von Bünau.

Allegedly, from 1622 to 1688 annual pensions were not paid in a regulated manner. The Johanniter then made a claim of 2,300 guilders and left the collection of this debt to Maximilian Heinrich von Burscheid, commander of the commander in Schleusingen and Weißensee. who ceded this debt to Ludwig Gerhard Freiherr von Hoym. This actually managed to come into possession of the Tempelhof in Deumen. He finally sold it in 1727 for 12,000 guilders to Rudolf von Bünau at Burg in Franconia.

In 1650 (as of 1648), the chronicler of the Order of St. John, Christian Osterhausen, still knew that the Order of St. John once had a commander in Droyzut.

Toast. Commendators and Priorities

The provosts of the branch in Droyßig are only very incomplete.

  • 1295 Johannes, commendator
  • 1303 Johannes, provisional
  • 1347 Conrad Swab, Provost
  • 1349 Rudolf Vizthum von Apolda, Provost, 1357 (only mentioned as the devout man of the Vitztum von Appolde ), 1362 Rudolf Vizthum von Apolda, Provost, Heinrich Schenk von Apolda, Procurator in Utenbach 1371 Rudolf, Provost
  • 1405 Johannes, Provost
  • 1452–63 Heinrich Lehemann, Provost
  • 1478 Johannes Syebach, Provost
  • 1494 Blasius, Provost (probably the following Prior Blasius Meye)
  • 1496/7 to 1518 Johannes Rösner, commander
  • 1497 Blasius Meye, prior
  • after 1498 Günther von Bünau, administrator in Droyßíg
  • 1518 Heinrich Neumeister, commander, prior before 1518
  • 1535 Georgius Lutz, provost
  • until 1557 Kilian Walter (or Christian Walner)
  • 1557 until after 1561 Johann Bertram the Younger
  • after 1561 to 1577 (+) Provost Rudolf von Bünau
  • 1578 Valention von Heese, commander of Rothenburg ob der Tauber

literature

  • Karl August Hugo Burkhardt: History of the German church and school visits in the age of the Reformation. 1. History of the Saxon church and school visits from 1524 to 1545. XXVIII, 347 pp., Verlag von Friedrich Wilhelm Grunow, Leipzig, 1879 (hereinafter abbreviated to Burkhardt, church and school visits with corresponding page number)
  • Kaspar Elm: The Ordo SS. Sepulcri Dominici Hierosolimitani. Investigations into the history and self-image of the chapter of the Holy Sepulcher. Freiburg i. Br., 1967
  • Kaspar Elm: Canon and Knight of the Holy Sepulcher. A contribution to the origin and early history of the Palestinian order of knights. In: Josef von Fleckenstein, Manfred Hellmann (ed.): The spiritual orders of knights of Europe, pp. 142–169, Sigmaringen 1980 (lectures and research 26)
  • Kaspar Elm: The Chapter of the Regulated Canons of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. In: Militia Sancti Sepulcri Idea e istituzione. Atti del Colloquio Internationale a cura di Kaspar Elm e Cosimo Damiano Fonseca . Pp. 203-222, Città del Vaticano 1998
  • Robert Hermann: Directory of the Saxony-Ernestine, Schwarzburg and Reussian lands, as well as the K. Preuss. Circles Schleusingen and Schmalkalden up until the Reformation there were found donors, monasteries and religious houses. Journal of the Association for Thuringian History and Antiquity. 7: 1–176, Jena, 1870 Online at Google Books , p. 72, Utenbach, p. 172 Deumen and Droy says
  • Jakob Hermens, The Order of Salvation. Dig. II edition. L. Schwann'sche Verlagshandlung, Cologne and Neuss, 1870. Online at Google Books (hereinafter abbreviated to Hermens, Der Orden vom Heil. Grabe with corresponding page number)
  • Wilhelm Herrmann: On the history of the Neisser Kreuzherren from the order of the regulated canons and guardians of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem with the double red cross. Inaugural dissertation, Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Breslau, 1938 Online at the Digital Library Wrocław (in the following abbreviated Herrmann, History of the Neisser Kreuzherren with corresponding page number)
  • Wilhelm Hotzelt: The Canons of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. In: The Holy Land in the past and present, pp. 107-136, Cologne, 1940 (Collected contributions and reports on Palestine research, 24-27)
  • Alphonse Huillard-Bréholles, Honoré Théodore Paul Joseph d'Albert de Luynes: Historia diplomatica Friderici Secundi sive constitutiones, privilegia, mandata, instrumenta quae supersunt istius imperatoris et filiorum ejus: accedunt epistolae paparum et documenta varia / collegit, ad fidemum chartarumuit , juxta seriem annorum disposuit et notis illustravit J.-L.-A. Huillard-Bréholles. Auspiciis et sumptibus H. de Albertis de Luynes. T. 1, Ps. 1, pp. 1–353, Paris, Plon, 1852 (hereinafter abbreviated as Huillard-Bréholles, Historia diplomatica Friderici Secundi, 1.1 with the corresponding page number)
  • Alphonse Huillard-Bréholles, Honoré Théodore Paul Joseph d'Albert de Luynes: Historia diplomatica Friderici Secundi sive constitutiones, privilegia, mandata, instrumenta quae supersunt istius imperatoris et filiorum ejus: accedunt epistolae paparum et documenta varia / collegit, ad fidemum chartarumuit , juxta seriem annorum disposuit et notis illustravit J.-L.-A. Huillard-Bréholles. Auspiciis et sumptibus H. de Albertis de Luynes. T. 1, Ps. 2, pp. 354-1065, Paris, Plon, 1852 (in the following abbreviated Huillard-Bréholles, Historia diplomatica Friderici Secundi, 1,2 with corresponding page number)
  • Nikolas Jaspert: Abbey and City: the Holy Sepulcher Priory of Santa Anna and the Canon Regular Abbey of Santa Eulàlia del Camp in medieval Barcelona (1145–1423). 575 pp., Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1996 ISBN 3-428-08505-1
  • Günter Kavacs: Grimma and Nimbschen: on the Cistercian culture in the Muldental. 95 S., Sax-Verl., Beucha, 1999 ISBN 3-930076-89-6 (in the following abbreviated Kavacs, Grimma and Nimbschen with corresponding page number)
  • Leopold Freiherr von Ledebur: The merger of the St. Lazarus order in Germany with the Johannitern. Weekly newspaper of the Johanniter-Ordens-Balley Brandenburg, 1st year, 10 issues (December 5, 1860): p. 37–39, Berlin 1860 (hereinafter abbreviated to Ledebur, amalgamation with corresponding page number)
  • Ralph Leitloff: The relationship of the Knights of St. John / Knights of Malta to the sovereign territorial powers of the Thuringian territories in the early modern period. Publishing house Dr. Kovac, Hamburg 2006 ISBN 978-3-8300-2500-9 (hereinafter abbreviated to Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta with the corresponding page number)
  • Christian Gottlob Lorenz: The city of Grimma in the kingdom of Saxony, historically described. Final booklet, pp. 789–1644, Dyk'sche Buchhandlung Leipzig. 1856 (hereinafter abbreviated to Lorenz, Die Stadt Grimma with the corresponding page number) Online at www.archive.org
  • Wilhelm Rein: Thuringia sacra. Document book, history and description of the Thuringian monasteries, Volume 2. Ettersburg, Heusdorf and Heyda. Hermann Böhlau, Weimar 1865 (hereinafter abbreviated to Rein, Thuringia sacra, Vol. 2 with the corresponding page number and certificate number)
  • Reinhold Röhricht: Regesta regni Hierosolymitani (1097–1291). Wagner, Innsbruck, 1893 (in the following abbreviated Röhricht, RRH with corresponding page number and certificate number)
  • Ludwig Schmidt: Document book of the city of Grimma and the monastery Nimbschen. Giesecke & Devrient, Leipzig 1895 (hereinafter abbreviated to Schmidt, Grimma document book with corresponding page number and document number)
  • Michael Schüpferling: The Templar Order in Germany. Dissertation to obtain a doctorate from the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Friborg in Switzerland , 1915 (hereinafter abbreviated as Schüpferling, Templar Order with the corresponding page number)
  • Uwe Süssbrich: The Holy Grave Provost and its founder Albert von Droy says . 115 p., Hochschulschrift Berlin, Freie Univ., Master's thesis, 1998
  • Friedrich Albert Voigt: The oldest gentlemen from Droässig. Quarterly journal for coat of arms, seal and family studies, 19: 79–284, Berlin 1891 (hereinafter abbreviated to Voigt, Herren von Droyßig with corresponding page number)
  • Ernst Zergiebel: Chronicle of Zeitz and the villages of the Zeitz district according to documents and files from the years 968 to 1895. Volume III. Historical reports about the city of Zeitz and the villages of the Zeitz district together with an appendix. Printed and published by W. Ronneburger, Zeitz 1894 (hereinafter abbreviated to Zergiebel, Chronik, Vol. 3 with corresponding page number)

Individual evidence

  1. ↑ Huillard-Bréholles, Historia diplomatica Friderici Secundi, p. 362 Online at www.archive.org (p. 362).
  2. ↑ Gotthilf Friedemann Löber: De Burggraviis Orlamundanis Commentatio M. Gotthilf Fridemanni Loeberi PL C De Burggraviis Orlamundanis Commentatio Documentis Genuinis Et Nunquam Antehac Editis Variisque Observationibus Comitum Maxime Orlamundanorum Historiam Illuminantibus Illustrata . Jena, 1741 CVI Bl. = (106 pp.) Online at Google Books (LXVIIII = p. 69 wording of the document, there wrongly 1214!).
  3. ^ Voigt, Lords of Droyzut. P. 155/6.
  4. ↑ Lorenz, Die Stadt Grimma, p. 1449 Online at www.archive.org
  5. ↑ F. Seng floor: Droyßig (= false attribution). Templerlexikon branches Germany. (PDF)
  6. ↑ Huillard-Bréholles, Historia diplomatica Friderici Secundi, p. 320/21 Online at www.archive.org (p. 362).
  7. ↑ a b c Kaspar Elm: St. Pelagius in Denkendorf. The oldest German provost of the chapter of the Holy Sepulcher in history and historiography. In: Kaspar Elm, Eberhard Gönner, Eugen Hillenbrand (eds.): State history and intellectual history. Festschrift for Otto Herding on his 65th birthday. Publications of the Commission for Historical Regional Studies in Baden-Württemberg, Series B, 92: 80–130, Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart 1977 (PDF) pp. 99–100.
  8. ↑ reeds, Regesta, S.384, Urk.Nr.1471.
  9. ↑ Leitloff, Johanniter- / Malteserritterorden, p. 75, footnote 248 (4).
  10. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 81.
  11. ↑ a b c d Lorenz, Die Stadt Grimma, p. 1450 Online at www.archive.org
  12. ↑ a b Rein, Thuringia sacra, Vol. 2, S.188, Document No. 187 Online at Google Books .
  13. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 86, footnote 184.
  14. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 88, footnote 289.
  15. ↑ Burkhardt, Kirchen- und Schulvisitationen, p. 226 Online at Google Books , p. 226
  16. ^ Paul Ellerholz, E. Kirstein, Traugott Müller, W. Gerland, Georg Volger, Bruno Schleh, P. Haake: Handbuch des Grundbesitzes im Deutschen Reiche. I. Kingdom of Prussia Volume 5: Province of Saxony. 4th improved edition, Nicolaische Verlags-Buchhandlung R. Stricker, Berlin 1907, p. 724
  17. ^ Zergiebel, Chronik, Vol. 3, p. 439.
  18. ↑ Zergiebel, Chronik, Vol. 3, p. 360.
  19. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 85.
  20. ↑ a b Burkhardt, Kirchen- und Schulvisitationen, p. 247 Online at Google Books , p. 278
  21. ↑ Rudolf Virchow: On the history of leprosy and the hospitals, especially in Germany. Archives for pathological anatomy and physiology and for clinical medicine, 18: 273–329, Berlin, 1860 Online at Google Books , p. 319.
  22. ↑ Lorenz, Die Stadt Grimma, p. 163 Online at www.archive.org
  23. ↑ Kavacs, Grimma and Nimbschen, p. 9.
  24. ↑ a b Lorenz, Die Stadt Grimma, p. 1451 Online at www.archive.org
  25. ↑ Schmidt, Urkundenbuch Grimma, p. 128, document number 195.
  26. ↑ a b Schmidt, Urkundenbuch Grimma, p. 134, document number 207.
  27. ↑ Schüpferling, Templar Order, p. 257, document IX.
  28. ↑ a b Schmidt, Urkundenbuch Grimma, p. 136, document number 214.
  29. ↑ a b Schmidt, Urkundenbuch Grimma, p. 139, document number 219.
  30. ↑ Schüpferling, Tempelherren-Orden, p. 258, Document XIII.
  31. ↑ Lorenz, Die Stadt Grimma, p. 1354 Online at www.archive.org
  32. ↑ Hermens, The Order of Salvation. Grabe, p. 97 Online at Google Books (wording of the Bull of Innocent VIII of March 28, 1489, p. 97-101)
  33. ↑ Ledebur, Fusion, p. 38 Online at Google Books
  34. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 79.
  35. ↑ Herrmann, Geschichte der Neisser Kreuzherren, p. 36
  36. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 80.
  37. ↑ Christian Schoettgen: Diplomatic and curious gleanings of the history of Upper Saxony and neighboring countries. Eighth part. Christoph Hekels sel. Sohn, Dresden & Leipzig, 1732 Online at Google Books
  38. ^ Walter Schlesinger: Church history of Saxony in the Middle Ages: The Age of the German East Settlement (1100-1300), Volume 2. P. 762, Böhlau, 1962 ISBN 3-412-02078-8 , ISBN 978-3-412-02078-1 ( Central German Research), p. 349
  39. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 169.
  40. ↑ a b Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 199.
  41. ↑ Reinhold Beck: Chronicle of the parish Droyzut. Self-published, Droyanzig, 1915, p. 21.
  42. ↑ Burkhardt, Kirchen- und Schulvisitationen, p. 278 Online at Google Books
  43. ↑ Burkhardt, Kirchen- und Schulvisitationen, p. 293 Online at Google Books
  44. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 171.
  45. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 176.
  46. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 173.
  47. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 187.
  48. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 189.
  49. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 205, footnote 592.
  50. ↑ a b Ferdinand Höckner: The parish Treben in the Altenburg district office districts of the Duchy of Saxony-Altenburg . In commission of the Schnuphaseschen Buchhandlung zu Altenburg, 1844 Online at Google Books , p. 112.
  51. ↑ Leitloff, Order of St. John / Knights of Malta, p. 185.
  52. ↑ Dm. Historical news from the order estate Deumen, belonging to the temple order court Droyssig. Dreßdnish scholars advertisements for the year 1753, 22: 188-189, Dresden 1753 Online at Google Books , S. 188/89.
  53. ↑ Holdings 12579 Arch. No. 0822: Heinrich von Bünau on Treben and Haselbach, Saxon Altenburg Chamberlain and administrator of the Bünauischer Tempelhof in Droyßt against Ludwig Gebhardt von Haym auf Droy says, Prießnitz, Großer Helmsdorf, electoral Saxon chamber and mountain ridge, chief tax collector of the Thuringian district and the hereditary chamber of the principality Halberstadt, because of complaints from the Bünauischer Tempelhof in Droyßig 1615/16
  54. ↑ Christian von Osterhausen: Real and thorough report, Whose what is necessary for a perfect knowledge and knowledge of the highly commendable, knightly order, S. Johannis von Jerusalem zu Malta. 844 S., Aperger, Augspurg, 1650 Online at Google Books
  55. ^ Voigt, Lords of Droyzut. P. 247.
  56. ^ Heinrich Friedrich Otto: Thuringia sacra sive historia monasteriorum, quae olim in Thuringia floruerunt: In Qva Eorvm Fvndatio, Historia Abbatvm, Fata, Antiqvitates, Mvtatio Et Interitvs Et Res Notabiles Hactenvs Ignotae Ex Codd. Manvscriptis, Membranis Avthenticis, Diplomatibvs, Monvmentis, Lapidibvs Et Sigillis Et Nvmmis Historico Et Chronologico Ordine, Exhibentvr. Weidmann, Frankfurt, 1737. Online at Google Books , p. 406.
  57. ↑ Rein, Thuringia sacra, Vol. 2, p. 210, Document No. 269 Online at Google Books .
  58. ^ Voigt, Lords of Droyzut. P. 250.
  59. ↑ Rein, Thuringia sacra, Vol. 2, p. 215, Document No. 283 Online at Google Books .
  60. ↑ Rein, Thuringia sacra, Vol. 2, S.225, Document No. 307 Online at Google Books .
  61. ↑ Rein, Thuringia sacra, Vol. 2, S.237, Document No. 345 Online at Google Books .
  62. ↑ Rein, Thuringia sacra, vol. 2, p.237, document number 346 online at Google Books .
  63. ↑ Eduard Sommer: Heinrich the Pious. The fatherland of the Saxons. Communications from Saxony's past and present, 2: 126-128, Dresden 1842 Online at Google Books p. 127

annotation

  1. ↑ Leitloff writes Stoben / Stobea here.
  2. ↑ Leitloff writes here to Styberitz.
  3. ↑ Leitloff writes here mistakenly Merck joke .
  4. ↑ Leitloff writes here Priebstäblich and leaves it open as to which place it is, Pristäblich (district of Lausig, district of northern Saxony) or Priesteblich (town of Markranstädt, district of Leipzig). He also ascribes jurisdiction over the place Priebstäblich to the convent in Droyßig ; but there is no documentary evidence of this.
  5. ↑ Leitloff writes here Groß Rumpstett and Klein Rumpstett
  6. ↑ Leitloff writes here Knappendorf
  7. ↑ Leitloff writes to Valentin from and to Hoeß.

Coordinates: 51 ° 2 '28.2 "  N , 12 ° 1' 44.2"  E