Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Coordinators and Lee Atwater: Difference between pages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Image with unknown copyright status removed: [[Image:Lee atwater.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Harvey Leroy "Lee" Atwater]] -->
{{WP Film Sidebar}}{{Shortcut|WT:FILMC}}{{bots|deny=SineBot}}
'''Harvey Leroy "Lee" Atwater''' ([[February 27]], [[1951]] &ndash; [[March 29]], [[1991]]) was an American [[political consultant]] and strategist to the [[United States Republican Party|Republican]] party. He was an advisor of [[President of the United States|U.S. Presidents]] [[Ronald Reagan]] and [[George H. W. Bush]]. He was also a political mentor and close friend of Republican strategist [[Karl Rove]]. Atwater invented or improved upon many of the techniques of modern electoral politics, including promulgating unflattering rumors and attempting to drive up opponents' "negative" poll numbers with the aggressive use of [[opposition research]]. He has been characterized as the "happy [[hatchet man]]" and "[[Darth Vader]]" of the Republican Party.<ref>Huffington, Ariana. [http://archive.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/05/31/jeffords/index.html The Jeffords Affair]. [[Salon.com]], [[May 31]], [[2001]]</ref> In spite of criticisms of Atwater's tactics as unethical and [[dirty tricks]], he was widely regarded as a near-brilliant political operative who helped candidates to win.


Atwater was also a musician. He briefly played backup guitar for [[Percy Sledge]] during the 1960s and frequently played with bluesmen such as [[B.B. King]]. Atwater recorded an album with King and others on [[Curb Records]] in 1990 entitled ''[[Red Hot & Blue]]''.<ref name="AMG">[[Allmusic]]: ''[http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:wpfrxqw5ldse Red Hot & Blue: Lee Atwater & Friends]'' Accessed [[2008-05-23]].</ref> He once sat in with [[Paul Schaeffer]] and his band on [[Late Night with David Letterman]]. His life is the subject of the feature-length documentary film ''[[Boogie Man: The Lee Atwater Story|Boogie Man]]''.<ref>[http://www.boogiemanfilm.com Boogie Man: The Lee Atwater Story]. Accessed [[2008-05-23]].</ref>
= Handbook =


== Open tasks ==
== Early career==
Atwater was born in [[Atlanta, Georgia]], grew up in Aiken, South Carolina, and graduated from [[Newberry College]], a small private [[Lutheran]] institution in [[Newberry, South Carolina]].


Atwater rose during the 1970s and the 1980 election in the [[South Carolina]] Republican party, working on the campaigns of Governor [[Carroll Campbell]] and segregationist Senator [[Strom Thurmond]].
:''These tasks should be done as often as needed—ideally, on a daily basis.''
During his years in South Carolina, Atwater became well known for running hard edged campaigns based on emotional "wedge issues".


Atwater's aggressive tactics were first demonstrated during the 1980 congressional campaigns. He was a campaign consultant to Republican incumbent [[Floyd Spence]] in his campaign for Congress against [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] nominee [[Tom Turnipseed]]. Atwater's tactics in that campaign included [[push poll]]ing in the form of fake surveys by "independent pollsters" to "inform" white suburbanites that Turnipseed was allegedly a member of the [[NAACP]].<ref>[http://www.turnipseed.net/atwaterart.htm What Lee Atwater learned and the lesson for his protégés], Washington Post, April 16, 1991, Page A19</ref> Atwater also highlighted that Turnipseed had been "hooked up to jumper cables" as a teen undergoing electroshock therapy for depression.
; Assessment
* Monitor the daily [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Film articles by quality log|assessment log]]. The main things to look for:
** Articles being removed. This is usually legitimate (due to merges or non-film articles getting untagged), but is sometimes due to vandalism or broken template code. Also note that even though the banner and tags remain on the talk page, assessing a Future-class will remove the article from the bot's listing.
** Articles being moved to "GA-Class" and higher quality. These ratings need to correspond to the article's status in the GA and FA lists, as well as our A-Class review.
** All newly added articles should be quickly scanned to see if additional task force tags or other maintenance tags (such as "needs infobox") are required.
* Deal with any new [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Assessment#Requests for assessment|assessment requests]], [[:Category:B-Class Film articles needing review|B-class articles needing review]], and the [[:Category:Unassessed film articles|unassessed articles]].


After the 1980 election Atwater went to Washington and became an aide in the [[Ronald Reagan]] administration, working under political director [[Ed Rollins]]. During his years in Washington, Atwater became aligned with Vice President Bush, who chose Atwater to run his 1988 presidential campaign.
; Peer review
* For each new peer review request:
*# Add the review to the {{tl|WPFILMS Announcements}} template.
*# Leave a note on the main project talk page, and with each appropriate task force or contact (if any), using the following boilerplate: <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/Peer review notice]]<nowiki>|Name of article}} ~~~~</nowiki></code>
* For each peer review that has been archived:
*# Remove the review from the {{tl|WPFILMS Announcements}} template.
*# Check the talk page to see that the parameter has been changed from "peer-review=yes" to "old-peer-review=yes".


==Atwater on the Southern Strategy==
; A-Class review
* For each new A-Class review request:
*# Add the review to the {{tl|WPFILMS Announcements}} template.
*# Leave a note on the main project talk page, using the following boilerplate: <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/A-Class review notice]]<nowiki>|Name of article}} ~~~~</nowiki></code>
*# Leave a note with each appropriate task force (if any), using the following boilerplate: <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/A-Class review notice]]<nowiki>|Name of article}} ~~~~</nowiki></code>
* For each ongoing A-Class review:
*# If a review has been open for two days without at least three editors commenting, leave a reminder note on the main project talk page, using the following boilerplate: <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/A-Class review alert]]<nowiki>|Name of article}} ~~~~</nowiki></code>
*# If a review has been open for four days, close and archive it.
* For each A-Class review that has been archived:
*# Remove the review from the {{tl|WPFILMS Announcements}} template.
*# If the article was promoted to A-Class (or demoted from it), add it to (or remove it from) the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films#Showcase|project showcase]].


As a member of the Reagan administration in 1981, Atwater gave an anonymous interview to Political Scientist [[Alexander P. Lamis]]. Part of this interview was printed in Lamis' book ''The Two-Party South'', then reprinted in ''Southern Politics in the 1990s'' with Atwater's name revealed. [[Bob Herbert]] reported on the interview in the [[October 6]], 2005 edition of the ''[[New York Times]]''. Atwater talked about the GOP's [[Southern Strategy]] and [[Ronald Reagan]]'s version of it:
; Featured content
* For each new [[WP:FAC|featured article candidacy]], [[WP:FAR|featured article review]], [[WP:FLC|featured list candidacy]], [[WP:FPCAN|featured portal candidacy]], and [[WP:FTC|featured topic candidacy]]:
*# Add the candidacy or review to the {{tl|WPFILMS Announcements}} template and the corresponding section in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Review|review department]].
* For each concluded [[WP:FAC|featured article candidacy]], [[WP:FAR|featured article review]], [[WP:FLC|featured list candidacy]], [[WP:FPCAN|featured portal candidacy]], and [[WP:FTC|featured topic candidacy]]:
*# Remove the candidacy or review from the {{tl|WPFILMS Announcements}} template and the corresponding section in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Review|review department]].
*# If the article, list, portal, or topic was promoted to featured status (or demoted from it), add it to (or remove it from) the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films#Showcase|project showcase]].


<blockquote>''Atwater'': As to the whole Southern strategy that [[Harry Dent]] and others put together in 1968, opposition to the [[Voting Rights Act]] would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [the new Southern Strategy of Ronald Reagan] doesn’t have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he’s campaigned on since 1964… and that’s fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster...</blockquote>
; Member outreach
* Welcome anybody who joins the project, using the following boilerplate: <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Outreach/Welcome]]<nowiki>|~~~~}}</nowiki></code>
* Update [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Outreach/{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} Newsletter]] with new developments within the project.
<!--* Monitor and vote on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Awards|proposals to award the ''WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves'']] and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Contacts‎|applications to become a subject-area contact]]. -->


<blockquote>''Questioner'': But the fact is, isn’t it, that Reagan does get to the [[George Wallace|Wallace]] voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stamps...?</blockquote>
; Other
* Fix the {{tl|Film}} syntax on any articles in [[:Category:Incorrectly tagged WikiProject Films articles]]. The main culprits are the following:
*#Deleted peer-review or old-peer-review parameters. Restore as appropriate.
*#No WP Films peer review subpage. This usually occurs when editors turn on the peer-review tag in our banner but use the main [[WP:PR|peer review]] page. Open the banner, click on the peer review redlink, and redirect the page (Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Peer review/Foo film) to the original peer review page (Wikipedia:Peer review/Foo film).
*#Changed page name. Do as above, but redirect to the wherever the original peer review was.
*#Start or Stub articles that meet all of the B-Class parameters. Check the article to see if they actually do. If not, change the relevant parameters. If they do, then reassess the article to B-Class.
*#A-Class articles which have not passed A-Class review. (To be effective shortly when the dormant parameter is activated.) Re-tag down to GA (if already earned) or B.


<blockquote>''Atwater'': You start out in 1954 by saying, “[[Nigger]], nigger, nigger.” By 1968 you can't say “nigger”&mdash;that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.</blockquote>
==One-time tasks==
:''These tasks are targeted housekeeping drives which require immediate attention only once or infrequent maintenance.''<!--I will be limiting this to no more than one new addition per week, generally speaking, unless irregular tasks are completed unusually quickly.-->
* '''Task force tagging''' - several task forces are in need of comprehensive "search and tag" runs so that the vast majority of their articles are identified and tagged. Most notably the following:
**War films
**Film awards (well-tagged, but needs a more thorough follow-up)
**Film festivals (well-tagged, but needs a more thorough follow-up)
* Retagging all instances of {{tl|FilmsWikiProject}} to {{tl|Film}}. '''Very''' low-priority.


<blockquote>And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me&mdash;because obviously sitting around saying, “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Nigger, nigger.”<ref>Lamis, Alexander P. et. al. (1990) ''The Two Party South.'' Oxford University Press. See also Herbert, Frank (October 6, 2005) [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C04E6DF1E30F935A35753C1A9639C8B63 “Impossible, Ridiculous, Repugnant.”] ''New York Times''.</ref></blockquote>
== Toolbox ==
==1988 election==


Atwater's most noteworthy campaign was the [[U.S. presidential election, 1988|1988 presidential election]], where he served as campaign manager for Republican nominee [[George H.W. Bush]]. A particularly aggressive media program included a television advertisement produced by [[Floyd Brown]] related to the case of [[Willie Horton]], a convicted murderer serving a life sentence in a Massachusetts prison who committed a rape while participating in a weekend furlough strongly supported by then-governor [[Michael Dukakis]] but which had been created by the previous governor, a Republican. The Horton campaign undoubtedly helped [[George H.W. Bush]] overcome Dukakis's 17-percent lead in early [[public opinion poll]]s and win both the electoral and popular vote. Although Atwater clearly approved of the use of the Willie Horton issue, the Bush campaign never ran any commercial with Horton's picture, instead running a [[Revolving Door (television advertisement)|similar but generic ad]]. The original commercial was produced by Americans for Bush, an independent group managed by Larry McCarthy, and the Republicans benefited from the coverage it attracted in the national news.
===New task force ===
:'''''N.B.''': Creating a task force involves a great deal of work, and is very time-consuming to reverse if an inappropriate or misnamed group is created. It is generally inadvisable to create task forces without prior discussion—particularly regarding the name and scope—on the [[WT:FILMS|project's main talk page]].''


During the election, a number of allegations were made in the media about Dukakis's personal life, including the unsubstantiated claim that Dukakis's wife [[Kitty Dukakis|Kitty]] had burned an American flag to protest the [[Vietnam War]], and that Dukakis himself had been treated for a mental illness. While claims persist that Atwater initiated these reports, there has been no proof that he did so.
Before a task force can be created, it is necessary to decide on a name for it. The process requires both a full name (e.g. "French cinema" or "Film festivals") and a one- or two-word or acronym shorthand used for some template parameters (e.g. "French" or "Festival"). The instructions below use the "Fooish cinema" task force (shortened to "Fooish") as an example; when creating an actual task force, remember to substitute the correct name, rather than actually creating the example pages.


The 1988 Bush campaign overcame a seventeen point deficit in midsummer polls to win forty states. Atwater's skills in the 1988 election led one biographer to term him "the best campaign manager who ever lived."
# Create the task force page:
## Create the main task force page ([[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Fooish cinema task force]]) with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/Task force]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema|Fooish}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
## Fill in the "Scope" section on the new task force page.
## Create the task force talk page ([[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Fooish cinema task force]]) with <code>{{tl|WPFILMS Sidebar}}</code> as the content.
# Add support for the task force to {{tl|Film}}:
## Select an image to use as the task force icon. The image should be recognizable at a small size and reasonably representative of the topic of the task force.
## Add the task force display code (shown below) to the task force section of {{tl|Film}}, in correct position among the task force parameters. If the name of the task force does not begin with a capitalized term—in other words, where the name would be lowercase if it were not a page title (e.g. "military aviation" or "maritime warfare")—an <code>altname=</code> parameter containing the lowercased version of the name must be passed to {{tl|Film/Task force categories}}.
##: <code><nowiki>{{!}}-</nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>{{#ifeq:{{{Fooish-task-force|}}}|yes|</nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>{{!}} style="width: {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|28px|43px}};" {{!}} [[Image:Fooimage.png|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|28x20px|43x30px}}|center]]</nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>{{!}} [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Fooish cinema task force|Fooish cinema task force]]<includeonly>{{Film/Task force categories|name=French cinema|class={{{class|}}}|importance={{{importance|}}}}}</includeonly></nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>
## Add <code><nowiki>{{{Fooish-task-force|}}}</nowiki></code> to the appropriate conditional statements in the template.
## Update the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Project banner|project banner instructions]]:
### Add "<code>|Fooish-task-force=</code>" to the example syntax, in correct position among the task force parameters.
### Add "<code><nowiki>* '''Fooish-task-force''' – "''yes''" if the article is supported by the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Fooish cinema task force|Fooish cinema task force]].</nowiki></code>" to the instructions, in correct position among the task force parameters.
# Set up the task force assessment infrastructure:
## Create the main task force category ([[:Category:Fooish cinema task force articles]]) with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force category|WPFILMS Task force category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
## Create the main task force assessment category ([[:Category:Fooish cinema articles by quality]]) with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment category|WPFILMS Task force assessment category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
## Create the assessment level sub-categories:
### [[:Category:FA-Class Fooish cinema articles]] with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment level category|WPFILMS Task force assessment level category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema|FA}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
### [[:Category:FL-Class Fooish cinema articles]] with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment level category|WPFILMS Task force assessment level category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema|FL}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
### [[:Category:A-Class Fooish cinema articles]] with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment level category|WPFILMS Task force assessment level category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema|A}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
### [[:Category:GA-Class Fooish cinema articles]] with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment level category|WPFILMS Task force assessment level category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema|GA}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
### [[:Category:B-Class Fooish cinema articles]] with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment level category|WPFILMS Task force assessment level category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema|B}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
### [[:Category:Start-Class Fooish cinema articles]] with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment level category|WPFILMS Task force assessment level category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema|Start}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
### [[:Category:Stub-Class Fooish cinema articles]] with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment level category|WPFILMS Task force assessment level category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema|Stub}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
### [[:Category:List-Class Fooish cinema articles]] with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment level category|WPFILMS Task force assessment level category]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema|List}}</nowiki></code> as the content.
## Add the task force's statistics table (<code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment|WPFILMS Task force assessment]]<nowiki>|Fooish cinema}}</nowiki></code>) to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Assessment#Task force statistics|task force statistics table]] in the assessment department.
# Set up the task force's open tasks listing:
## Create the task force's open task template ({{tl|WPFILMS Announcements/Fooish cinema}}) using the syntax shown on {{tl|WPFILMS Announcements/Task force}} as the content. At a minimum, the <code>name=</code> parameter must be set to "<code>Fooish cinema</code>"; optionally, some initial tasks should be located and added to the listing.
## Add the new template to the "Task force lists" section of {{tl|WPFILMS Announcements}}; the column break should be moved, if necessary, to keep the two columns properly aligned.
# Set up the task force's userboxes:
## Create the task force userbox ([[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Outreach/User WPFILMS Fooish cinema task force]]) with the following content, using the same image as was used in {{tl|Film}} above:
##: <code><nowiki><div style="float: left; border:solid #C0C090 1px; margin: 1px;"></nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: #F8EABA;"</nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>|-</nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>| style="width: 45px; height: 45px; background: wheat; text-align: center; font-size: 14pt; color: black;" | [[Image:Fooish_image.png|45x45px]]</nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>| style="font-size: 8pt; padding: 4pt; line-height: 1.25em; color: #000000;" | This user is a member of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Fooish cinema task force|'''Fooish cinema task force''']] of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films|WikiProject Films]].</nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>|}</div></nowiki></code>
## Add the following to the userbox listing at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Outreach#User banners and userboxes]], in proper order among the other task force userboxes:
##: <code><nowiki>|-</nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>| <tt><nowiki>{{</nowiki></nowiki><nowiki>[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Outreach/User WPFILMS Fooish cinema task force]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></nowiki><nowiki></tt></nowiki></code>
##: <code><nowiki>| {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Outreach/User WPFILMS Fooish cinema task force}}</nowiki></code>
# Add the task force to the project's navigation system:
## Add a link to the task force to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films#Task forces|"Task forces" section]] of the main project page.
## Add a link to the task force <!--and the talk page--> to the appropriate task force section of {{tl|WP Film Sidebar}}
# Announce the new task force:
## Add an announcement of the new task force page to the "Announcements" section of {{tl|WPFILMS Announcements}}, and to the discussion of the task force proposal on the project's talk pages (if any).
## Add the task force to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory/Culture#Films|"Films" section of the WikiProject directory]]; add cross-reference links to any other sections into which the task force falls.


During that campaign future president [[George W. Bush]], son of [[Vice President of the United States of America|Vice President]] George H.W. Bush, took an office across the hall from Atwater's office, where his job was to serve as "the eyes and ears for my dad," monitoring the activities of Atwater and other campaign staff. In her memoir, [[Barbara Bush (First Lady)|Barbara Bush]] said that George W. and Atwater became friends.
=== Boilerplate and templates ===
:''mostly "Film"-ified...''
{| class="collapsible collapsed" style="width: 100%; border: 1px solid silver; margin-bottom: 1em;"
|-
! style="text-align: left;" | Public boilerplate notices
|-
| style="padding: 1em;" |
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/A-Class review alert]]<nowiki>|X}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/A-Class review notice]]<nowiki>|X}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/Peer review notice]]<nowiki>|X}}</nowiki></code>
|}


==RNC Chairman==
{| class="collapsible collapsed" style="width: 100%; border: 1px solid silver; margin-bottom: 1em;"
|-
! style="text-align: left;" | Public templates
|-
| style="padding: 1em;" |
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Archive|WPFILMS Archive]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment|WPFILMS Task force assessment]]<nowiki>|X|second_project=Y}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment category|WPFILMS Task force assessment category]]<nowiki>|X|second_project=Y}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force assessment level category|WPFILMS Task force assessment level category]]<nowiki>|X|second_project=Y}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Task force category|WPFILMS Task force category]]<nowiki>|X|second_project=Y}}</nowiki></code>
|}


After the election, Atwater was named chairman of the [[Republican National Committee]].
{| class="collapsible collapsed" style="width: 100%; border: 1px solid silver; margin-bottom: 1em;"
|-
! style="text-align: left;" | Hidden structural templates & boilerplates
|-
| style="padding: 1em;" |
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/Toolbox/Banner]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/Toolbox/Newsletter boilerplate]]<nowiki>|...}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/Task force]]<nowiki>|X}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Film/Class|Film/Class]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Film/Task force categories|Film/Task force categories]]<nowiki>|X}}</nowiki></code>
* <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:WPFILMS Announcements/Task force|Film Announcements/Task force]]<nowiki>|X}}</nowiki></code>
|}


Shortly after Atwater took over the RNC, [[Jim Wright]] was forced to resign as [[Speaker of the United States House of Representatives]] and was succeeded by [[Tom Foley]]. On the day Foley officially became speaker, the RNC began circulating a memo to Republican Congressmen and state party chairmen called "Tom Foley: Out of the Liberal Closet." The memo compared Foley's voting record with that of openly gay Congressman [[Barney Frank]], with a subtle implication that Foley was himself gay. It had been crafted by RNC communications director Mark Goodin and House Minority Whip [[Newt Gingrich]]. In fact, Gingrich had been trying to get several reporters to print it.<ref name="Time">{{cite news |first=Margaret |last=Carlson |authorlink=Margaret Carlson |coauthors= |title=Getting Nasty |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101890619-152038,00.html |work=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |publisher= |date=1989-06-24 |accessdate=2008-05-28 }}</ref> The memo was harshly condemned on both sides of the aisle. Republican Senate leader [[Bob Dole]], for instance, said in a speech on the Senate floor, "This is not politics. This is garbage."
== Notes ==
Project issues
* Weekly open task collab
* explicit IMDb guideline
* character notability clarification
* class-specific advice in the banner for how to get to the next level
* "medal of honor"-level award reserved for coordinators to confer (coordinators will not be eligible to receive while in office)
* next election round approaching, do we need more coordinator spots?
* expanding the style guidelines to cover a broader range of subjects, massaging them in preparation for formal MOS review
* specific future film tasks
* implementing core contest; creating a contest dept for this and other tasks
* member questionnaire?
* A-Class review, dealing with current A's


Atwater initially defended the memo, calling it "no big deal" and "factually accurate." However, a few days later, he claimed he hadn't approved the memo.<ref name="Time"/> Under pressure from President Bush, Atwater fired Goodin, replacing him with B. Jay Cooper.
=Discussion=
{{archive box|
* [[/Archive 1|Tranche I (October 2007-April 2008)]]
* [[/Archive 2|Tranche II (April 2008-September 2008)]]
}}


== Brief note ==
==Illness==


On March 5, 1990, Lee Atwater collapsed during a fundraising breakfast on behalf of Senator [[Phil Gramm]].<ref>Oreskes, Michael [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CEED91F3DF933A05750C0A967958260 Lee Atwater Dies at 40] [[New York Times]] [[March 31]], [[1991]]</ref> Doctors searching for an explanation to what was initially thought to be a mere fainting episode discovered a grade 3 [[astrocytoma]], an usually aggressive form of malignant neoplasm, in his right parietal lobe.<ref>Brady, John [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/bckgrnd/atwater.htm I'm Still Lee Atwater] ''[[Washington Post]]'' [[December 1]], [[1996]]</ref> Atwater underwent interstitial implant radiation, a then-new form of treatment, at Montefiore Medical Center in New York City, and received conventional radiation therapy at George Washington University Hospital in Washington, DC.
I apologize for having not formally addressed the new coordinators yet - other affairs online and offline have prevented this. I hope to have time later today and rectify this with a proper introduction and comprehensive report on where we stand, as well as some proposals for future initiatives.


[[Sidney Blumenthal]] has speculated that, had Atwater lived, he would have run a stronger re-election campaign for Bush than the President's unsuccessful 1992 effort against [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Ross Perot]].<ref>[http://www.newyorker.com/archive/1992/10/19/1992_10_19_040_TNY_CARDS_000361908 Sidney Blumenthal article in New Yorker]</ref>
I also am somewhat sorry that the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Wikipedia 0.7|0.7 contest]] was created without prior consultation, but the imminent deadline of the 0.7 release version's publication forced my hand; plans were already in the cards to apply something similar to the [[WP:FILMCORE|core department]] over time, so this will afford us a test-run. Nehrams had also laid the groundwork of a review table to identify individual article problems - the contest is merely a logical extension to this work. Please do not view the quick release as an attempt to prevent critique, however - I am happy to discuss any changes either here or on the contest's talk page. Adjustments made mid-stream are not ideal, but in this particular case, we'll have to make that sacrifice if need be. Thanks, [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 11:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
:Excellent work, it looks much better than it was before. I think we still need a section for the revisions, since we need to determine those by October 20th. If there are people that are improving the articles before then that should be fine, and we can start choosing revisions just a few days before the deadline. I believe we should see a lot of progress in the coming months for these articles. --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]]) 18:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
::Wow, I actually didn't realize we needed to be ready ''that'' soon. Should we create some sort of additional incentive to get the editors to focus on tagged articles? [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 18:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
:::Yeah, that's why I was in such a hurry to try and set all of this up. I really don't know why they gave the projects only a month's notice, especially for the projects that had several hundred articles to cover. What did you have in mind for the additional incentive? --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]]) 02:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
::::Not really sure - which I guess is why I'm asking. Hmmm, [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 08:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
:::::I guess we could divert some of the awards for raising the classes to completing the revisions. Maybe use Tireless Contributor, Working Man, and Diligence barnstars but require a larger amount of revisions to be completed (first level could be 10-20). Whatever we can do to get people to help with the revisions will really help out for looking over the 200 articles. --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]]) 19:28, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
::::::Forgive my confusion, but to what does the December 1 deadline refer, if the revisions that are going to be used need to be selected by October 20? [[User:Steve|<span style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''Steve'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Steve|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Steve|C]]</sup> 19:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
:::::::The December 1st deadline is just an indicator of how far the articles have improved in a few months (we probably didn't want to drag out this drive over a year, so three months away seemed like a reasonable ending point). However, based on the success of the drive, we may likely do similar drives, especially for our other core articles. Finding the revision is a separate thing then improving the articles (although if the articles improve before the October 20th deadline, we will have better revisions to provide for the 0.7 release). --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]]) 19:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
::::::::That does clarify matters. The current wording at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Wikipedia 0.7|the 0.7 contest page]] ("...before the scheduled publication of Wikipedia 0.7 currently set for December 2008") makes it sound as if we have until then to improve/tag revisions of these articles for 0.7, when October 20 is the cutoff and December just an arbitrary end to the improvement drive. Thanks. As for incentives, does Wikipedia still frown upon cash rewards? :) [[User:Steve|<span style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''Steve'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Steve|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Steve|C]]</sup> 21:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
:::::::::Steve, you may want to check out [[WP:REWARD]]. Not sure if that is anything we can formalize... I don't quite have the budget to persuade editors to improve some articles. :) —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 21:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
'''Question''' As one of the new coordinators, I should ask: what else should we be focusing on for our coordinator duties? Thanks. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 21:12, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
:I apologize for my lack of promptness, which I hope to emend shortly after I return from a work commitment. This will be clarified, I promise. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


==Atwater apologizes==
== Topic workshop ==
Shortly before his death from a [[brain tumor]], Atwater said he had converted to [[Catholicism]], through the help of Fr. John Hardon, S.J.,<ref>Thomas Aquinas College. [http://www.thomasaquinas.edu/news/newsletter/2001/winter/fr_hardon.htm In Memoriam: Fr. John Hardon, S.J.]. Accessed [[2008-05-23]]. "His converts were many, including Lee Atwater, the feisty chairman of the Republican National Committee, to whom Fr. Hardon gave last sacraments when he was on his death bed with brain cancer in 1990."</ref> and, in an act of [[repentance]], Atwater issued a number of public and written letters to individuals to whom he had been opposed during his political career, including Dukakis. In a letter to Tom Turnipseed dated June 28, 1990, he stated, "It is very important to me that I let you know that out of everything that has happened in my career, one of the low points remains the so-called 'jumper cable' episode," adding, "my illness has taught me something about the nature of humanity, love, brotherhood and relationships that I never understood, and probably never would have. So, from that standpoint, there is some truth and good in everything."<ref>Turnipseed, Tom. ''[http://www.turnipseed.net/atwaterart.htm What Lee Atwater Learned and the Lesson for His Protégés],'' ''Washington Post'', April 16, 1991. Accessed [[2008-05-23]].</ref>


In a February 1991 article for ''[[Life Magazine]]'', Atwater wrote:
I've been working on [[User:Sephiroth BCR/Film topic workshop draft|a draft]] of the [[WP:ANIME/TW|topic workshop]] I made for [[WP:ANIME]] and adapting it for [[WP:FILM]], and am nearly done. Any commentary on the workshop itself before I finish it and set into motion? Basically, the general idea is that you have a centralized place to propose topics, and they can receive input from the community, as well as garner more visibility and help. — <font face="Segoe Script">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''sephiroth bcr'''</font>]]</font> <font face="Verdana"><sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 22:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


<blockquote>
:Looks like a terrific start! My only major concern about the effectiveness of this topic workshop is that, well, it's really hard to get a group of articles under a topic up to Good Article status. Film series seem to be the only plausible approaches. I was also wondering about something -- you mention that any upcoming film article is inherently unstable (which I agree with), so if there was a topic related to an actor or a director, would an article about an upcoming film disrupt a featured topic? For example, my personal idea for a featured topic had been director [[Neil Marshall]] with ''[[Dog Soldiers (film)|Dog Soldiers]]'', ''[[The Descent]]'', and ''[[Doomsday (film)|Doomsday]]'', but if he began a fourth film, what happens? —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 22:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
My illness helped me to see that what was missing in society is what was missing in me: a little heart, a lot of brotherhood. The '80s were about acquiring — acquiring wealth, power, prestige. I know. I acquired more wealth, power, and prestige than most. But you can acquire all you want and still feel empty. What power wouldn't I trade for a little more time with my family? What price wouldn't I pay for an evening with friends? It took a deadly illness to put me eye to eye with that truth, but it is a truth that the country, caught up in its ruthless ambitions and moral decay, can learn on my dime. I don't know who will lead us through the '90s, but they must be made to speak to this spiritual vacuum at the heart of American society, this tumor of the soul.
::Looks good to me. I actually [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Alien#Potential_good_topic_candidate|suggested to WikiProject Alien]] last week to link together multiple articles into a good topic, since there are already several film articles that are GA/FA status. I'm sure it would fall under our project as well. --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]]) 23:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
</blockquote>
::I would echo Erik's observation. Does it make sense to be proactive and suggest possible subjects for consideration? Or should we be reactive and see what suggestions flow in? [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 00:16, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
:::<small>(To Erik)</small> Yes, topics are hard to produce ([[User:Sephiroth BCR/Accomplishments#Featured topics|I know, I've made three]]), but this is why we have a centralized place to work on them. And if there was an upcoming film, it would be "audited", meaning that the article would go through a peer review with exhaustive commentary that would address any problems with the article. This would qualify the article as part of the topic. This is done in cases of articles/lists that cannot become good articles or featured lists for whatever reason (television series that has not finished airing, film in production, video game that has not been released). And if you made a topic on Marshall and he made a fourth film, then you would be given about three months to bring the article up to snuff so it can be audited and included in the topic. After the film is released, you would have six months to improve the article to GA. I'm just saying the difficulty is in the updating that you have to do and the work involved in keeping the topic up-to-date. As for what types of topics, yeah, beyond film series and filmographies, the only other potential topics that come to mind are awards-related topics (I have one posited around the [[Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film]] planned). That said, with the way the workshop is set up, people are free to suggest their ideas, and can receive input to see whether it is a viable topic or not. In this manner, we're not necessarily static in the form of topics we can create (although a majority will ultimately be series/filmographies or similar).
:::<small>(To Eco)</small> Both are intended. Anyone can propose topics, so we can propose a few and leave it open for everyone to contribute. IMO, filling it up with too many topics dilutes resources, but we definitely shouldn't feel hesistant about bringing ideas forward. — <font face="Segoe Script">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''sephiroth bcr'''</font>]]</font> <font face="Verdana"><sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 07:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
::::If I could propose a topic, I think we need get some serious editing on the films directed by [[Orson Welles]]. I've already done significant expansions on [[The Immortal Story]] and [[The Trial (1962 film)]], created a new article on [[The Dreamers (unfinished film)]], and I hope to sandblast the article on [[Macbeth (1948 film)]]. I will probably do an expansion of [[Filming Othello]], which I created as a stub some months ago. I've looked at articles on Welles' unfinished [[The Other Side of the Wind]] and his lost [[Too Much Johnson]] and both (I feel) are terribly written; the article on [[The Stranger (1946 film)]] could probably use expansion, too. For a filmmaker of Welles' significance, the level of scholarship on Wikipedia relating to his canon appears wobbly and often lacking. I wouldn't mind generating some sort of project-wide enthusiasm to clean up these articles. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 12:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Another question as I consider possible featured topics... what about [[James Dean]] and his three films? He has been on stage and in television as well. Can the actor and the three films make up a featured topic or not? Just trying to understand the extent of the topic boundaries. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 23:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
:Yes. You define the scope of the topic at the start, and if you want it to be "Films James Dean acted in" (bad title, just a throwaway), then that's the scope you've set for yourself. Do note, however, that the main article has to establish a clear basis for a topic (aka, you can't cherry pick; for instance, "Films James Dean acted in before 1956", which would exclude [[Giant (film)]], is not appropriate). — <font face="Segoe Script">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''sephiroth bcr'''</font>]]</font> <font face="Verdana"><sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 23:57, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
:::Correction: Dean ''starred'' in three films, but he had small roles and bit parts in other flicks. That could be part of a James Dean happening here. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 12:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
::As an FYI, I just did a massive rewrite of Orson Welles' lost film [[Too Much Johnson]]. I am a bit surprised that the non-Kane Welles articles have been problematic. I will get to "Macbeth" later next week. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 16:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
:::I think that articles like these are problematic because the topics do not stand out as much. I think that our base of editors at WikiProject Films is relatively young, and if you look at our [[WP:FILMSPOT|spotlight]], there's a lot of recent films that achieve some kind of status. In addition, for older films that may not be highlighted by the media as much, research may be harder to conduct. You can see the lack of content in the WikiProject's [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Core|core list]] with all the Stub-class and Start-class articles. I've considered creating a resources subpage to address this... to both list possible resources and to provide a forum so people can request assistance in researching a topic. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 17:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
::::A central area to point out possible resources for articles would be a great idea. It would allow other members who have access to university databases, libraries, member-only websites, museums, etc. to be able to assist in providing sources in improving article content. This could further improve our numbers in GAs/FAs if members knew where they could find more information for a particular article. --[[User:Nehrams2020|Nehrams2020]] ([[User talk:Nehrams2020|talk]]) 17:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
::I am not certain about research problems for older films. There might be more of a comfort level in writing about more recent films versus a title from the 1930s. I believe Erik's idea of a list of resources is an excellent idea, since I find myself returning to a select number of online sources for many of the articles I write and edit. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 19:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
:::As an FYI, I wanted to see Wikipedia's coverage of the Orson Welles unfinished film version of "Don Quixote," which recently had its US DVD debut -- and there is no article on the subject. I am going to create one, as that void is fairly remarkable and needs to be filled. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 14:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


== Belated welcome ==
==R&B music==
As a teenager in [[Columbia, South Carolina]], Atwater played [[guitar]] in a rock band, The Upsetters Revue. His special love was R&B music. Even at the height of his political power he would often play concerts in clubs and church basements, solo or with B.B. King, in the Washington, D.C. area. He released an album called ''Red, Hot And Blue'' on [[Curb Records]], featuring [[Carla Thomas]], [[Isaac Hayes]], [[Sam Moore]], [[Chuck Jackson]], and B.B. King, who got co-billing with Atwater.<ref name="AMG"/> [[Robert Hilburn]] wrote about the album in the April 5, 1990 issue of the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'': "The most entertaining thing about this ensemble salute to spicy [[Memphis]]-style '50s and '60s R&B is the way it lets you surprise your friends. Play a selection such as 'Knock on Wood' or 'Bad Boy' for someone without identifying the singer, then watch their eyes bulge when you reveal that it's the controversial national chairman of the Republican Party…Lee Atwater."


==See also==
I apologize for not being able to make an introductory address to the new coordinators earlier - some unexpected offline commitments left me with too little time earlier to properly gather my thoughts and address you all with sufficient depth.
* [[opposition research]]
* [[List of brain tumor patients]]
* [[Red Hot & Blue (restaurant)]]


==Further reading==
First of all - congratulations on being elected! I am deeply honored to be working with each of you, and I'm very pleased to see that we've yielded such a strong field of coordinators, all of whom I am familiar with as regular, thoughtful contributors to our endeavors. Perhaps the proof in the pudding is that you've already gotten off to a strong start, as the discussions already begun here clearly evidence! :) This is also, of course, something our expansion has helped facilitate, and I look forward to seeing the coordinator talk page truly becoming a place of collaboration, brainstorming, and initiative-taking.
* Brady, John (1997) ''Bad Boy: The Life and Politics of Lee Atwater.'' Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
*Lee Atwater and T. Brewster, "Lee Atwater's Last Campaign," ''Life Magazine'', February 1991, p. 67.
*Tom Turnipseed, "[http://www.turnipseed.net/atwaterart.htm What Lee Atwater Learned and the Lesson for His Protégés]," ''Washington Post'', April 16, 1991, p. A19.
*John Joseph Brady, ''Bad Boy: The Life and Politics of Lee Atwater'' (1997), ISBN 0-201-62733-7.
*Alexander P. Lamis (editor), ''Southern Politics in the 1990s'' (1999), ISBN 0-8071-2374-9.
*Alexander P. Lamis, ''The Two-Party South'' (1990), ISBN 0-19-506579-4.


==References==
Let me get a few of the sterner items of the agenda out of the way first:
{{Reflist}}
#All coordinators '''must''' have this page added to their watchlist if they haven't already. We shouldn't have to be calling for you, and your self-nomination presumes that you want to be regularly involved here, so please do make it easier by keeping your eye on the discussions. (Contributing regularly wouldn't hurt either! ;)
#One of the responsibilities we've formally incorporated into the position starting with this term is that all coordinators are expected to perform a regular amount of service in the Review department reviewing items which appear there. The highest prior items are the A-Class reviews - this is because they not only require a minimum of three support votes, but also because coordinators are formally written into that review process to administer to it. This is particularly relevant at the moment, as we have three articles in review, one of which has been drawn out far too long - and we are all responsible for this, myself included. The A-class reviews must be processed faster, in order to keep them a useful option. The second priority is reviewing any items which have no garnered any critiques yet. Beyond that, just keeping your hand in is still important, as it keeps coordinators up-to-date on what deficiencies we're seeing in articles, and how we can address them ahead of time. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


===New business===
==External links==
* [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/bckgrnd/atwater.htm I'm Still Lee Atwater, ''Washington Post'']
====Tag and Assess drive====
* [http://robbaustin.com/index.cfm?action=archive&sub=article&art=24 Atwater's Star Still Shines Brightly, ''www.robbaustin.com'']
This project has not yet undergone a Tag and Assess drive, which is quite unusual for a WikiProject of this size. Is this warranted at the moment? If so, how shall we proceed, and is anyone interested in organizing it? [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


:I think it may help to define a Tag and Assess drive. It seems like we have reevaluated our assessments (rejecting C-class and formalizing B-class/A-class), so I think we could use a comparison of what other WikiProjects have done in their own Tag and Assess drive. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


{{RNCchairmen}}
====Task force coordination====
Would it be advisable for task forces to be directly under the purview of one or two coordinators each? This would give the task forces direct points-of-contact for any issues they need assistance with, and also allow the coordinators to regularly evaluate their needs and suggest common solutions here as need be. I also think that this may be crucial for upcoming tasks that we really need to finally get around to, such as style guidelines for articles that aren't about individual films, as well as assessment standards for those articles, notability and naming guidelines, and specialized infoboxes. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


{{DEFAULTSORT:Atwater, Lee}}
:I don't believe that it needs to be compulsory; there may be existing task forces for which there is not a coordinator who has a vested interest in its goals. Another approach could be to have coordinators watchlist the WikiProject's task forces and keep eyes open for any discussion that may either need to be centralized or could use an attentive response. Another thought about task forces... I was wondering how the WikiProject would assess the task force if there is not much activity within it or the articles under the force? Any kind of expiration policy in place so we don't get bogged down in too many branches? We don't have to be too strict with something like this, though. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
[[Category:Republican National Committee chairmen]]
[[Category:United States presidential advisors]]
[[Category:American campaign managers]]
[[Category:American political consultants]]
[[Category:College Republicans]]
[[Category:Deaths from brain cancer]]
[[Category:1951 births]]
[[Category:1991 deaths]]


[[de:Lee Atwater]]
::I concur, I don't think this needs to be anything formal. However, we should make sure that each task force talkpage is watchlisted by at least two (any two) coordinators (and maybe if you want to be more formal about it, that each coordinator is watchlisting at least two task forces), to see what issues are cropping up in the quieter corners. To that end, it might be useful to list the task forces here, in order to properly discover who's keeping an eye on what. [[User:Steve|<span style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''Steve'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Steve|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Steve|C]]</sup> 19:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
[[es:Lee Atwater]]

[[sv:Lee Atwater]]
:::Is there any way we can categorize the task forces' talk pages? We could follow its recent changes, like with their main pages [[Special:RecentChangesLinked/Category:WikiProject Films task forces|here]] (currently shows only one edit from the past 7 days). Looking at the other WP:FILM pages, maybe we could put all the discussion pages under a centralized category. [[:Category:WikiProject Films talk pages]], perhaps? Or is that not a common approach on Wikipedia? —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 20:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

::And as for an expiration, you're talking about the possibility of closing inactive ones, right? As far as I can see, an inactive task force isn't eating up too many resources, so I'd prefer not to specify a certain length of time before a task force is closed; we can bring them up on a case-by-case basis if necessary and leave it to a good judgement call. [[User:Steve|<span style="font-variant: small-caps;">'''Steve'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Steve|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Steve|C]]</sup> 20:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

:::Sorry, to clarify, my suggestion was in response to keeping an eye on the WikiProject's various talk pages. I'm not too worried about expiration dates at this point, but I just predict that we might have a number of quiet task forces down the road. Going back to watching all the pages, I had another thought... if we can add [[:Category:WikiProject Films]] to {{tl|WPFILMS Sidebar}}, we could capture both project pages and project talk pages' [[Special:RecentChangesLinked/Category:WikiProject Films|recent edits]]. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 20:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====Organizations task force====
I'd like to create a task force to cover articles on Organizations, Schools, Institutions, Companies, etc. Much of this is currently tagged under the Filmmaking task force (although not all are), and it seems to actually be more appropriate to group these together, as they will have a more common structure and content. This could also be a joint task force with other relevant WikiProjects such as [[WP:COMPANIES|WikiProject Companies]] and [[WP:ORGZ|WikiProject Organizations]]. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

:I think this would be a good idea. Would it be safe to say that style guidelines could be developed for these kinds of articles under this particular task force? I'd be happy to lend my support to this task force, especially in drafting the guidelines. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

::Yes, I think that would be key to it being successful. And again, with some help from the other WikiProjects, it might not require too much in the way of style guidelines which they don't already cover. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====V0.7 revisions selection====
This is urgently looming, since we have a deadline of October 20th, IIRC. Anyone interested in helping out with this will be greatly appreciated. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

===Old business===
(Much of this is verbatim from the last time these were brought up.)
====Questionnaire====
Many of our editors - and by extension, the project - seem to get active in fits and starts, and in some of our key areas, such as assessment and reviews, go from moribund to busy back to moribund again without much rhyme or reason. Others, like CotW or Translation just died outright. I've been considering creating some new departments such as Contests and perhaps even a rotating open task (see below), but maybe it would be worth polling our members first to find out more about what drives their participation. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

:I think it is a good idea to find out what would attract some of the more distant members of WikiProject Films. Maybe it's just me, but I included two pretty major discussions in recent newsletters (such as external links in film infoboxes) and did not find much response through that venue. Perhaps we could start by assessing if people watchlist WP/WT:FILM and see how they feel about being involved. Factors could include feeling overwhelmed or intimidated by the types of discussions, and we could find ways to assuage these factors. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

::I second that emotion. The coordinator election brought out a relatively low number of editors who opted to vote. People were aware of the election but opted not to participate. I am curious to know what people think of this WikiProject. [[User:Ecoleetage|Ecoleetage]] ([[User talk:Ecoleetage|talk]]) 14:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====IMDb guideline====
Has the encyclopedia made it apparent enough that the IMDb is not a reliable source? It seems a common stumbling block for so many editors that they can't rely on the site, and yet there isn't much in the way of a formal declaration to the effect. Also, should this go into the style guidelines, be thrown to RS, or perhaps be elsewhere? [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
:Probably should go into the style guideline considering how relevant it is to the project. — <font face="Segoe Script">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''sephiroth bcr'''</font>]]</font> <font face="Verdana"><sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 05:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

:The best approach may be to write an essay about using IMDb. Using content from [[WP:CIMDB|WP]]/[[WT:CIMDB]] and additional discussions, we could establish how IMDb could be successfully be used. I think it is pretty clear that IMDb is not considered a reliable source, in and out of the WikiProject. It could still be used as a springboard, though. Information about the cast and crew can be cross-checked with other websites, and bits like trivia could be further researched to find a more reliable source for inclusion. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====Character articles====
Do characters who only appear significantly in one work actually justify independent articles? [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
:If they have enough coverage to satisfy the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]], then I see no reason why they shouldn't have articles. How many serialized works is largely irrelevant in comparison to the notability the article asserts. You could have a character present in one media that is notable due to sufficient coverage and have a character present in five media that is not notable due to insufficient coverage. The only implication that appearances in several media conveys is that there is a greater possibility sources can be found to assert notability. — <font face="Segoe Script">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''sephiroth bcr'''</font>]]</font> <font face="Verdana"><sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 05:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
::Yes, but if they only appear in one work, what can be said that requires a separate page, instead of being noted within the source material's article? [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
:::We should observe whether the material would be better suited for the primary article in order to not give [[WP:WEIGHT|undue weight]] to the character through an article, but the cases in which an article on the character is justified are when there is significant information on the creation/conception/production of the character, as well as a boatload of reception via critical reviews. A good sign is when trying to incorporate the production and reception into the main article creates an undue weight problem by placing too much emphasis on the character; at this point, having a separate article for the character is justified. I know this seems arcane, and in the long run, it will be a case-to-case basis. That said, I wouldn't necessarily prohibit articles on characters that have only appeared in one media. A note that the character does have to be sufficiently notable is sufficient in my opinion. — <font face="Segoe Script">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''sephiroth bcr'''</font>]]</font> <font face="Verdana"><sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 06:02, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
::::I agree with Sephiroth that it is likely to be a case-by-case basis. I think that one thing we could determine is "significant coverage" for a character. For example, reviews may tend to focus on how a main character is written in a film, or how an actor performs the role. These reviews, though, tend to be contemporary and borderline [[WP:NOT#NEWS|newsy]]. Like I mentioned in my comment below, we should look at examples... one could be a character being considered the "epitome of masculinity" as retrospectively covered by academic sources. That kind of thing. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 06:12, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
::::(edit conflict) I don't see how much undue weight there could be if the only primary source is the film - I mean, any acceptable secondary sources would be reviews or critical studies, which would be fair play. Any character garnering that amount of attention will be a key player, and thus worthy of in-depth discussion within the reception section. Can you think of any particular examples that would cause a problem? [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 06:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
:I think that this is unlikely for the most part, and it seems like some time would need to pass to properly assess a character's importance beyond his or her solo film appearance. There may be some prominent stand-alone films whose characters have been heavily studied... we probably should look to not-so-recent films and see if there are any such characters we can identify to help shape consensus. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

It may be worth looking at [[AFI's 100 Years... 100 Heroes and Villains]] and identifying fictional characters who appear in only one film. A couple of examples include [[George Bailey (fictional character)|George Bailey]] and [[Mister Potter]]. Quite a few possibilities simply redirect to their respective films' articles. We could do a few [[WP:SET|search engine tests]] to see if any of the characters have significant coverage of themselves with the film only in the background. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 20:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====Future films updating====
We've discussed adding additional parameters into the template to identify a Future-Class film's release date, so as to help automate re-assessment, especially for less-mainstream releases. This is also crucial since Future-class articles "go dark" on the assessment logs, which makes it difficult to track them otherwise. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

:Perhaps we can pursue some minor date parameters, such as <code>festival=</code>, <code>limited=</code>, or <code>wide=</code>. I have to admit, though, I am not clear on how they could be adequately tracked for reassessment. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

::This is more of a banner thing, so those different ones you mentioned aren't particularly relevant. Really, it would be more of a <code>year=</code>, <code>month=</code>, <code>day=</code> which would be used by the template to automatically categorize it as [[:Category:Future films releasing on October 12, 2008]], for example, or [[:Category:Future films releasing in October 2008]] or [[:Category:Future films releasing in 2008]] if more specific dates aren't specified. Any Future-Class articles without at least a year filled in would go to [[:Category:Future films needing release date]]. Now, the point of all of these categories is so that as soon as a film is released, it goes to a normal assessment class. Additionally, films with somewhat unclear release dates can be re-checked closer to their release to ascertain their current status. To me, this means something public and openly accessible: ie, limited or wide, but not festival release. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

:::This sounds like a great idea! I'd support the addition of these parameters. I can work on the [[WP:FUTFILM|future films department]]'s page to mention these parameters and keep an eye on what needs to be reassessed. Is it going to be easy to work in the parameters? Seems like the big challenge would be looking out for non-English releases. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 20:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====Open tasks====
Would it be worth exploring the option of having a weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly open task collaboration amongst the members? The regular shift in focus would break up the monotony, while only featured one at a time would also reduce the sense of being overwhelmed which members may otherwise feel if confronted with the full scope of remaining work. Additionally, we have recently overhauled the project banner to fully deprecate the separate "needs" banners into project banner parameters. Should this sort of task be split amongst members, or is it too admin-ish to spend their time on? [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====Banner revision====
I believe that Erik had proposed adding some additional "needs-X" parameters to the project banner. Additionally, Nehrams and I discussed expanding the "how to get the article to the next class" sub-templates to include more than the Stub and Start classes. And as per above, non-film articles will require these to be re-written for their type of content. (This can probably be handled in conjunction with specific task force parameters, such as Festivals, Awards, or Filmmaking.) [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Relevant discussion can be found [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films/Coordinators/Archive 2#Revisiting "Needs and requests"|here]]. Looks like I need to get around to these concise messages. If anyone else wants to pitch in, feel free to do so. —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====Contests====
The contest department may be forthcoming, primarily in order to provide incentives for working on the Core articles. We could also provide general contests for general article improvement, as well as open task collaborations or other assessment drives. Thoughts on how to best run these are definitely wanted. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====Peer review====
The wiki-wide peer review overhaul seems to have optimized their reviews past what we can offer, and gives the benefit of more eyes on the PR. Is it worth us maintaining a wholly separate process, or should we just transclude the general PRs within the Review department PR section? [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
:The latter. Having one peer review in multiple places increases the visibility and doesn't split discussions. — <font face="Segoe Script">[[User:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="navy">'''sephiroth bcr'''</font>]]</font> <font face="Verdana"><sup>'''([[User talk:Sephiroth BCR|<font color="blue">converse</font>]])'''</sup></font> 07:21, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

====Style guidelines====
The task forces which focus on film-related topics are in desperate need of their own style guidelines. Expansion of our MOS, infoboxes, templates, etc to standardize these articles is going to be a continuing concern and possible hindrance to their ability to create viable FAs without some guidance beyond the ad hoc. Identifying key members of these task forces also will help. [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

:I think we need to clarify what kind of task forces would warrant style guidelines. For example, task forces focused on geography or genre may not necessarily need to have style guidelines beyond [[MOS:FILM|what already exists]]. For film organizations, film history, or filmmaking techniques, though, style guidelines could be useful. We could check to see the norm for these topics on a more generic level (organization, history, technology). —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

===Other comments===
Please feel free to address them here.

Again, I look forward to seeing everyone work together here, and I have very good feeling that we'll get a great deal accomplished! :) [[User:Girolamo Savonarola|Girolamo Savonarola]] ([[User talk:Girolamo Savonarola|talk]]) 05:10, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

:I agree with Girolamo; it is nice to see a growing number of coordinators, and I hope that we can all come up with some great ideas about how to move this WikiProject forward! —<font face="Palatino Linotype">[[User:Erik|Erik]]</font> ([[User talk:Erik|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erik|contrib]]) - 05:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:30, 12 October 2008

Harvey Leroy "Lee" Atwater (February 27, 1951March 29, 1991) was an American political consultant and strategist to the Republican party. He was an advisor of U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. He was also a political mentor and close friend of Republican strategist Karl Rove. Atwater invented or improved upon many of the techniques of modern electoral politics, including promulgating unflattering rumors and attempting to drive up opponents' "negative" poll numbers with the aggressive use of opposition research. He has been characterized as the "happy hatchet man" and "Darth Vader" of the Republican Party.[1] In spite of criticisms of Atwater's tactics as unethical and dirty tricks, he was widely regarded as a near-brilliant political operative who helped candidates to win.

Atwater was also a musician. He briefly played backup guitar for Percy Sledge during the 1960s and frequently played with bluesmen such as B.B. King. Atwater recorded an album with King and others on Curb Records in 1990 entitled Red Hot & Blue.[2] He once sat in with Paul Schaeffer and his band on Late Night with David Letterman. His life is the subject of the feature-length documentary film Boogie Man.[3]

Early career

Atwater was born in Atlanta, Georgia, grew up in Aiken, South Carolina, and graduated from Newberry College, a small private Lutheran institution in Newberry, South Carolina.

Atwater rose during the 1970s and the 1980 election in the South Carolina Republican party, working on the campaigns of Governor Carroll Campbell and segregationist Senator Strom Thurmond. During his years in South Carolina, Atwater became well known for running hard edged campaigns based on emotional "wedge issues".

Atwater's aggressive tactics were first demonstrated during the 1980 congressional campaigns. He was a campaign consultant to Republican incumbent Floyd Spence in his campaign for Congress against Democratic nominee Tom Turnipseed. Atwater's tactics in that campaign included push polling in the form of fake surveys by "independent pollsters" to "inform" white suburbanites that Turnipseed was allegedly a member of the NAACP.[4] Atwater also highlighted that Turnipseed had been "hooked up to jumper cables" as a teen undergoing electroshock therapy for depression.

After the 1980 election Atwater went to Washington and became an aide in the Ronald Reagan administration, working under political director Ed Rollins. During his years in Washington, Atwater became aligned with Vice President Bush, who chose Atwater to run his 1988 presidential campaign.

Atwater on the Southern Strategy

As a member of the Reagan administration in 1981, Atwater gave an anonymous interview to Political Scientist Alexander P. Lamis. Part of this interview was printed in Lamis' book The Two-Party South, then reprinted in Southern Politics in the 1990s with Atwater's name revealed. Bob Herbert reported on the interview in the October 6, 2005 edition of the New York Times. Atwater talked about the GOP's Southern Strategy and Ronald Reagan's version of it:

Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry Dent and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [the new Southern Strategy of Ronald Reagan] doesn’t have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he’s campaigned on since 1964… and that’s fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster...

Questioner: But the fact is, isn’t it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stamps...?

Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, “Nigger, nigger, nigger.” By 1968 you can't say “nigger”—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.

And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Nigger, nigger.”[5]

1988 election

Atwater's most noteworthy campaign was the 1988 presidential election, where he served as campaign manager for Republican nominee George H.W. Bush. A particularly aggressive media program included a television advertisement produced by Floyd Brown related to the case of Willie Horton, a convicted murderer serving a life sentence in a Massachusetts prison who committed a rape while participating in a weekend furlough strongly supported by then-governor Michael Dukakis but which had been created by the previous governor, a Republican. The Horton campaign undoubtedly helped George H.W. Bush overcome Dukakis's 17-percent lead in early public opinion polls and win both the electoral and popular vote. Although Atwater clearly approved of the use of the Willie Horton issue, the Bush campaign never ran any commercial with Horton's picture, instead running a similar but generic ad. The original commercial was produced by Americans for Bush, an independent group managed by Larry McCarthy, and the Republicans benefited from the coverage it attracted in the national news.

During the election, a number of allegations were made in the media about Dukakis's personal life, including the unsubstantiated claim that Dukakis's wife Kitty had burned an American flag to protest the Vietnam War, and that Dukakis himself had been treated for a mental illness. While claims persist that Atwater initiated these reports, there has been no proof that he did so.

The 1988 Bush campaign overcame a seventeen point deficit in midsummer polls to win forty states. Atwater's skills in the 1988 election led one biographer to term him "the best campaign manager who ever lived."

During that campaign future president George W. Bush, son of Vice President George H.W. Bush, took an office across the hall from Atwater's office, where his job was to serve as "the eyes and ears for my dad," monitoring the activities of Atwater and other campaign staff. In her memoir, Barbara Bush said that George W. and Atwater became friends.

RNC Chairman

After the election, Atwater was named chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Shortly after Atwater took over the RNC, Jim Wright was forced to resign as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives and was succeeded by Tom Foley. On the day Foley officially became speaker, the RNC began circulating a memo to Republican Congressmen and state party chairmen called "Tom Foley: Out of the Liberal Closet." The memo compared Foley's voting record with that of openly gay Congressman Barney Frank, with a subtle implication that Foley was himself gay. It had been crafted by RNC communications director Mark Goodin and House Minority Whip Newt Gingrich. In fact, Gingrich had been trying to get several reporters to print it.[6] The memo was harshly condemned on both sides of the aisle. Republican Senate leader Bob Dole, for instance, said in a speech on the Senate floor, "This is not politics. This is garbage."

Atwater initially defended the memo, calling it "no big deal" and "factually accurate." However, a few days later, he claimed he hadn't approved the memo.[6] Under pressure from President Bush, Atwater fired Goodin, replacing him with B. Jay Cooper.

Illness

On March 5, 1990, Lee Atwater collapsed during a fundraising breakfast on behalf of Senator Phil Gramm.[7] Doctors searching for an explanation to what was initially thought to be a mere fainting episode discovered a grade 3 astrocytoma, an usually aggressive form of malignant neoplasm, in his right parietal lobe.[8] Atwater underwent interstitial implant radiation, a then-new form of treatment, at Montefiore Medical Center in New York City, and received conventional radiation therapy at George Washington University Hospital in Washington, DC.

Sidney Blumenthal has speculated that, had Atwater lived, he would have run a stronger re-election campaign for Bush than the President's unsuccessful 1992 effort against Bill Clinton and Ross Perot.[9]

Atwater apologizes

Shortly before his death from a brain tumor, Atwater said he had converted to Catholicism, through the help of Fr. John Hardon, S.J.,[10] and, in an act of repentance, Atwater issued a number of public and written letters to individuals to whom he had been opposed during his political career, including Dukakis. In a letter to Tom Turnipseed dated June 28, 1990, he stated, "It is very important to me that I let you know that out of everything that has happened in my career, one of the low points remains the so-called 'jumper cable' episode," adding, "my illness has taught me something about the nature of humanity, love, brotherhood and relationships that I never understood, and probably never would have. So, from that standpoint, there is some truth and good in everything."[11]

In a February 1991 article for Life Magazine, Atwater wrote:

My illness helped me to see that what was missing in society is what was missing in me: a little heart, a lot of brotherhood. The '80s were about acquiring — acquiring wealth, power, prestige. I know. I acquired more wealth, power, and prestige than most. But you can acquire all you want and still feel empty. What power wouldn't I trade for a little more time with my family? What price wouldn't I pay for an evening with friends? It took a deadly illness to put me eye to eye with that truth, but it is a truth that the country, caught up in its ruthless ambitions and moral decay, can learn on my dime. I don't know who will lead us through the '90s, but they must be made to speak to this spiritual vacuum at the heart of American society, this tumor of the soul.

R&B music

As a teenager in Columbia, South Carolina, Atwater played guitar in a rock band, The Upsetters Revue. His special love was R&B music. Even at the height of his political power he would often play concerts in clubs and church basements, solo or with B.B. King, in the Washington, D.C. area. He released an album called Red, Hot And Blue on Curb Records, featuring Carla Thomas, Isaac Hayes, Sam Moore, Chuck Jackson, and B.B. King, who got co-billing with Atwater.[2] Robert Hilburn wrote about the album in the April 5, 1990 issue of the Los Angeles Times: "The most entertaining thing about this ensemble salute to spicy Memphis-style '50s and '60s R&B is the way it lets you surprise your friends. Play a selection such as 'Knock on Wood' or 'Bad Boy' for someone without identifying the singer, then watch their eyes bulge when you reveal that it's the controversial national chairman of the Republican Party…Lee Atwater."

See also

Further reading

  • Brady, John (1997) Bad Boy: The Life and Politics of Lee Atwater. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Lee Atwater and T. Brewster, "Lee Atwater's Last Campaign," Life Magazine, February 1991, p. 67.
  • Tom Turnipseed, "What Lee Atwater Learned and the Lesson for His Protégés," Washington Post, April 16, 1991, p. A19.
  • John Joseph Brady, Bad Boy: The Life and Politics of Lee Atwater (1997), ISBN 0-201-62733-7.
  • Alexander P. Lamis (editor), Southern Politics in the 1990s (1999), ISBN 0-8071-2374-9.
  • Alexander P. Lamis, The Two-Party South (1990), ISBN 0-19-506579-4.

References

  1. ^ Huffington, Ariana. The Jeffords Affair. Salon.com, May 31, 2001
  2. ^ a b Allmusic: Red Hot & Blue: Lee Atwater & Friends Accessed 2008-05-23.
  3. ^ Boogie Man: The Lee Atwater Story. Accessed 2008-05-23.
  4. ^ What Lee Atwater learned and the lesson for his protégés, Washington Post, April 16, 1991, Page A19
  5. ^ Lamis, Alexander P. et. al. (1990) The Two Party South. Oxford University Press. See also Herbert, Frank (October 6, 2005) “Impossible, Ridiculous, Repugnant.” New York Times.
  6. ^ a b Carlson, Margaret (1989-06-24). "Getting Nasty". Time. Retrieved 2008-05-28. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  7. ^ Oreskes, Michael Lee Atwater Dies at 40 New York Times March 31, 1991
  8. ^ Brady, John I'm Still Lee Atwater Washington Post December 1, 1996
  9. ^ Sidney Blumenthal article in New Yorker
  10. ^ Thomas Aquinas College. In Memoriam: Fr. John Hardon, S.J.. Accessed 2008-05-23. "His converts were many, including Lee Atwater, the feisty chairman of the Republican National Committee, to whom Fr. Hardon gave last sacraments when he was on his death bed with brain cancer in 1990."
  11. ^ Turnipseed, Tom. What Lee Atwater Learned and the Lesson for His Protégés, Washington Post, April 16, 1991. Accessed 2008-05-23.

External links