Template talk:Did you know

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vickser (talk | contribs) at 09:02, 30 July 2008 (→‎Articles created/expanded on July 30: re: scuttling of the german fleet). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Li Zhaoxing
Li Zhaoxing

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old; for details see these rules.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Instructions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or expanded (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If a suitable image is available, place it immediately before the suggestion. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should:
    • not be marked as stubs;
    • contain more than 1,500 characters (around 1.5 kilobytes) in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles longer than 1,500 characters may still be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
    • cite their sources (these sources should be properly labelled; that is, not under an "External links" header); and
    • be no more than five days old (former redirects, stubs, or other short articles whose number of characters have been expanded fivefold or more within the last five days are acceptable).
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Articles with good references and citations are preferred.
  • To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. (The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.)
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    • interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    • short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    • neutral,
    • definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    • always cited in the article with an inline citation.
Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely-licensed pictures;
    • attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px-wide) resolution;
    • already in the article; and
    • relevant to the article.
    • formatted as [[Image:image name |right|100x100px| Description]] and placed directly above the suggested fact.
  • Proposed lists should have two characteristics to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults), and (ii) have 1,500+ character non-stub text that brings out interesting, relational, and referenced facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please sign the nomination, giving due credit to other editors if relevant. For example:
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- new article by [[User]] and ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]]; Nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold and self-nom by ~~~~
    • *... that (text)? -- Article expanded fivefold by [[User]] and ~~~~
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|May 13}} Thanks, ~~~~
  • For more details see the previously Unwritten Rules.
  • If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol Code Ready for DYK? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query An issue needs to be clarified before the article's eligibility can be determined
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe Article is currently ineligible but may only need some minor work to fix
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

2024-05-13T00:00:00Z

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on July 30

This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues The article is only 1441 characters, excluding references. Please expand it to at least 1500 characters. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues While the 51 fact is supported with an inline citation, there's no citation on the claim that the ships were later salvaged. Length and date do check out, though, and the picture is also free use and okay for the front page. While I'm commenting, great job on the article! It's thorough, well illustrated, and absolutely beautiful. Vickser (talk) 09:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues While length and date check out, the article needs inline citations to be eligible for DYK. Here's to hoping this can get fixed up, as it looks like a pretty great article. Vickser (talk) 08:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, and inline citation are all there. Offline source accepted on good faith. Vickser (talk) 08:10, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Length and date check out, and the picture's freely licensed, but you need an inline citation for the hook immediately following the sentence, not just at the end of the paragraph. Fix that and you should be good to go. Vickser (talk) 08:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 29

James Ludington
James Ludington
Historically, I've spaced out my monument articles, but after someone put nine separate hooks for Oregon's regions at one time, I no longer see the need to space them out. I can see someone suggesting a triple hook for all three today; I won't oppose it.--Bedford Pray 17:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lord Nelson
Lord Nelson
Goats graze east of Goldwaithe, Texas, in the Texas Hill Country
OR:
Mount Everest
Mount Everest
  • ... that through Khitan, the Islamic rite of male circumcision, Muslims are the largest single religious group to circumcise males? -- new article by Ezra haSofer (talk | contribs); Nom by CB (ö) 05:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC) (yes, this hook is a little awkward and could use a rewording; I thought it best not to add a pic for this due to possible vandalism later)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Reference verified. Length is just a smidge short of 5x expansion being around 735 bytes in Aug, 2007 and around 3430 bytes today. A 5x expansion would be closer to 3675 bytes. AgneCheese/Wine 12:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Updated, as per request Please re-review. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 14:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
File:Muleshoe shoe IMG 0395.JPG
A 22-foot muleshoe greets visitors to Muleshoe Heritage Center


Articles created/expanded on July 28

Length, date and hook verified. PeterSymonds (talk) 01:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ananda Everingham
Ananda Everingham
  • Article is a smidge short at around 1353 bytes of pure article text (excluding infobox and lists). I would also recommend adding an inline cite to the lead for the hook. AgneCheese/Wine 12:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the Rockies Express Pipeline, currently under construction, will be the largest natural gas pipeline built in the United States in more than 20 years, and one of the largest natural gas pipelines ever built in North America? --self nom.Beagel (talk) 20:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan Girl at the Cemetery
Orphan Girl at the Cemetery
Are these T-shirts still being sold by NBC? I hope we aren't providing ad space on Wikipedia's frontpage to promote these T-shirts. --74.13.127.194 (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Burr Caswell
Burr Caswell
  • ... that Burr Caswell (pictured) built his farmhouse in 1849 out of old driftwood and it is now a museum centerpiece? new article, self nom by --Doug talk 11:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Someone put this on AfD, despite obvious notability. Hopefully it will be closed soon.--Bedford Pray 01:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It was kept.--Bedford Pray 22:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If I may, I'd like to request that this hook be used on the front page between noon and 3pm, New York City time, on Friday, August 1st.--Bedford Pray 17:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date, and hook verified. Malinaccier (talk) 23:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Peace and Brotherhood Chapel at the Vietnam Memorial State Park in Angel Fire, New Mexico.
The Peace and Brotherhood Chapel at the Vietnam Memorial State Park in Angel Fire, New Mexico.
Turned photo caption into rollover text for space reasons. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Farmhouse in Garrison Grist Mill Historic District
Farmhouse in Garrison Grist Mill Historic District

Articles created/expanded on July 27

Highland Park Masonic Temple
Highland Park Masonic Temple
Length, reference and date of creation verified. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the old Lodge Room at the Highland Park Masonic Temple (pictured) has been preserved with original anaglyphs and cherry wood paneling? new article, self nom. Cbl62 (talk) 20:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I unlinked anaglyph because I didn't find an explanation of the wallpaper sense of that word on Wikipedia or Wiktionary. Art LaPella (talk) 22:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me.--Bedford Pray 04:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Trader Joe's Coastal Cabernet Sauvignon
Trader Joe's Coastal Cabernet Sauvignon
Length, reference and date of creation verified. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the Loire Valley estate Chateau de Goulaine is believed to be the oldest winery in existence and the third oldest commercial enterprise in the world? (new article self nom) Primary ref is Offline but I also added an extra online reference for additional verification (though the online ref add a general disclaimer the book is very reliable on its own). AgneCheese/Wine 03:15, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length verified; primary ref accepted as secondary ref checks out fine. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length verified; offline reference accepted on good faith. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dugout (football) redirects to Technical area. Which is the proper English football term? What was used by Colman? --74.13.127.194 (talk) 18:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from that, length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified; metric values added. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jane Meutas
Jane Meutas
Length, date and hook verified. PeterSymonds (talk) 01:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aliwan Fiesta
Aliwan Fiesta
ALT ... that Sinulog Festival of Cebu City in the Philippines has won the most number of championships in Aliwan Fiesta's (pictured) cultural street dance competition?
ALT ... that the highlight of Aliwan Fiesta (pictured) is a four-kilometer dance parade of different cultural festivals of the Philippines? new article, self-nom by Starczamora (talk) 18:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops, sorry. I have corrected it. Thank you. Starczamora (talk) 06:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length & reference verified. As a side note....WOW what a great job expanding the article on a topic that is arguably a core subject for an encyclopedia. Many Kudos to Tim. It would be wonderful if the article could be enhanced with some images or illustrations--maybe something to get into the lead slot on the DYK update? AgneCheese/Wine 23:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The image would have to be not-copyrighted, correct? By that, I mean no "fair use" images (because those can't be on the main page).- Tim1965 (talk) 00:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added two images and a chart to the article (all drawn from Commons), and hope to find an exciting (!) picture of vet students doing clinical training (from my personal collection) to add to Commons tomorrow. Maybe even another chart, if I'm really industrious and lucky. - Tim1965 (talk) 01:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Statement is not cited in the article. Thingg 01:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Birches
The Birches
Length and date confirmed. Verified using NRHP entry. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 22:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Paddy Moran
Paddy Moran
  • ... that Paddy Moran, (pictured) aggressively defended the area in front of his net by using his stick to slash opposing players near his net and exhaling at them while chewing tobacco? (Self-nom, 5x expansion) Maxim(talk) 01:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 26

Moved from July 29, to this section. The date the article started to be created/expanded, is where the hook should be placed. Length, date and hook verified. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 05:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Franz Liszt
Franz Liszt
  • ... that although he wrote six dozen German songs (or Lieder), Franz Liszt was accused by critics of never having had a proper grasp of the German Lied? -- new article by User:Deb; Nom by Rlendog (talk) 23:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest: Commons:Image:Liszt 1839.png (right) or any portrait in Commons:Category:Franz Liszt. --74.13.127.194 (talk) 01:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest mention of 1973 and Bruce Springsteen in the hook. You have room. --74.13.127.194 (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. I made the changes above. Rlendog (talk) 16:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Smith Estate
Smith Estate
Giant Dead Leaf Mantis
Giant Dead Leaf Mantis
My change of "lays" to "lies" was reverted, so please see Lay or Lie? Art LaPella (talk) 03:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Between now and when it hits the Main page, can the references be formatted properly using {{cite web}} or whatever else is appropriate? Daniel Case (talk) 15:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified; changed "intervention" to the more appropriate "efforts". Daniel Case (talk) 15:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and hook verified, but the article is supported by only one reference. PeterSymonds (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a new section on the museum with another reference now. bsrboy (talk) 01:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
or:
They're short enough that we can combine them both so we know why David's notable in his own right:
Length and ref verified. Per concerns that have been raised regarding this editor, I did not find any text that appeared to have been copy-and-pasted; however others are free to check in more depth. Daniel Case (talk) 15:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, hook and date verified. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and creation date verified; offline reference accepted in good faith. Daniel Case (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the music video for Blooddrunk was filmed at former Nazi barracks in Krampnitz, near Berlin? (self-nom) LuciferMorgan (talk) 14:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • According to this page, Kaserne Krampnitz was built by the Nazis as a Heeresreitschule (army riding school) and used as a base for Red Army armoured forces from the late 1940s. I suggest "Red Army barracks" instead of "Nazi barracks". Also, Krampnitz isn't in Berlin, it's in Potsdam. Xn4 (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • I misread the source, and changed it to "near Berlin" - I'm assuming that's what the source means by "in the vicinity of..". Furthermore, do you have an English written source? I cannot speak German. Anyway, the article itself says the Russian army was stationed there "prior to the reunification of Germany". Would it be better if I chose an alternative fact instead? Please let me know - I'd rather change the fact than not have a DYK for the article not used. LuciferMorgan (talk) 18:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        • Your problem here is really that roadrunnerrecords.com isn't likely to be a very reliable source for the history and geography of Potsdam... and when you stop to check out what it says, it doesn't prove to do very well. Here's a page in English you could use, which refers to the riding school and the Russian barracks, but as channel4.com isn't much better than roadrunnerrecords.com, I should cite the bbfc.de page, too, noting that it's in German. Xn4 (talk) 20:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article falls short of 5x expansion. It was around 2,901 bytes on July 20th and is now only around 6,997 bytes today. You will need to get closer to 14,505 to qualify. It would be great if you could expand the article further. I found it a very interesting read on a subject we don't see too often at DYK. AgneCheese/Wine 22:49, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ely Cathedral
Ely Cathedral
Length verified; ODNB reference taken on good faith, although if any editor with access can verify and green-check this that would be great. Daniel Case (talk) 15:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ODNB reference verified. David Underdown (talk) 15:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lady with a Harp by Thomas Sully
Lady with a Harp by Thomas Sully
Length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and date of creation verified; offline ref accepted on good-faith grounds. Daniel Case (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What's in the map? I can't tell what's there with the image displayed at 100x100px. Perhaps we should consider an alternate picture? --74.13.127.194 (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's a map of Seattle, with Interbay highlighted. Other possible images would be Commons:Image:Interbay P-Patch poppies 01.jpg or Commons:Image:GLO map of Interbay and Magnolia claims - 1863.jpg. - Jmabel | Talk 21:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Map thumbnails are generally discouraged on the Main Page for exactly this reason ... it's hard to tell what the map is of. Use one of the other images. Daniel Case (talk) 15:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Besides that, length and reference verified. Daniel Case (talk) 15:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 25

  • While the moustache is certainly rockin', the article is technically outside DYK date parameters for eligibility. It was created on July 11th and has not been expanded five fold within the last 5 days. It's certainly an extremely well done article that has real FA-potential. The referencing on the hook checks out and if an admin wants to do a "exception" listing on DYK, that is their call. AgneCheese/Wine 11:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Curses, my mistake. Sorry for wasting your time. Skomorokh 16:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length & reference verified. Though I would cut off the tail end "commissioned for the Apostolic Palace". While the ref supports it, there is no mention in article of this tid bit and I don't think it really enhances the "catchiness" of the hook. AgneCheese/Wine 11:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • As for the A.P. part, I was just trying to give some context to the painting. Linking to the Raphael Rooms would accomplish this from my point of view as well. Savidan 02:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length verified. Offline reference accepted in good faith. AgneCheese/Wine 11:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The phrase "claims sovereignty to" gets 19 Google hits, and in none of those cases does the sovereign entry come after the word "to". "Sovereignty under" might be better, but the article doesn't say that, and the reference says: "We do not seek to restore 'British Sovereignty', rather we seek to restore the Native Sovereignty of our People under God and the Crown." Art LaPella (talk) 01:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is that better? Otherwise "sovereignty under QEII" or "under England" would be fine, since it's British rule in general, not her specifically... - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:04, 26 July 2008 (UTC) OK... that should work... I think 'claims itself as a commonwealth' is about the most accurate description of the situation... - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues One single inline citation isn't going to cut it.--Bedford Pray 06:21, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be leery about promoting a hook about a subject that's already been deleted five times. Also, please remove the blatant POV and personal opinions from the article ("Part 3 there is the interesting one" and "I kind of doubt it"). - Bobet 10:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That section was a copyvio added by another user just this morning, it has been removed. - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A couple more citations just added... regarding the previously deleted, from the deletion edit summaries, I assumed it had been deleted under CSD for lack of content (and that was 2 years ago IIRC). I tried to write a legitimate article, and don't think it would qualify for CSD in it's present form... - Adolphus79 (talk) 15:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My concern is that the hook suggests some some of validation for its claims. Its a topic worthy to be on Wikipedia, but how many people realize what a micronation actually means?--Bedford Pray 05:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It suggests nothing, just that they claim sovereignty... and as for how many people know what a micronation is, isn't that all the more reason to have it as a DYK? People that don't know might actually learn something from it... - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it be called the United Kingdom and not Great Britain, as Great Britain is a geographical term. Although if you are refering to the current status of the commonwealth, it's now called the Commonwealth of Nations. 86.29.141.64 (talk) 13:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sympathetic to this article, but I don't see why this supposed micronation is notable. There are literally thousands of these micronations which exist primarily in the mind of one individual and whoever reads that individual's website. In it's current state, this article is a better canidate for AfD that DYK. - House of Scandal (talk) 21:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also going to oppose putting this article on the main page. I'm not sure it's notable or verifable enough that it would pass an AfD, so we shouldn't feature it. Vickser (talk) 07:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone speaks german they should feel free to verify and green-tick this. Length, date and inline citation all check out. Great article! Vickser (talk) 17:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
German ref. verified. The system works! Olaf Davis | Talk 22:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hygrocybe austropratensis
Hygrocybe austropratensis
Looks good, but perhaps the hook needs a tweak so people know it was a work?--Bedford Pray 18:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've never been a big fan of any hook that relies solely on in-universe details. Was there something special about the event with real-world implications? - Bobet 10:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay then. How about the latter? –LAX 18:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of "as part of their storyline", maybe say kayfabeed?--Bedford Pray 20:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now? –LAX 20:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me.--Bedford Pray 20:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length verified. Offline reference accepted in good faith. AgneCheese/Wine 10:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are these 2 images for? They were posted here without a hook. --74.14.21.221 (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you mean buy a hook for the images? Do you mean I need a DYK to accompany the images as well? - Hexhand (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We feature brand new (or freshly expanded) articles on DYK, not recently uploaded images. Yes, we need a hook. This webpage is where we review hooks for DYK. With no hooks, what excuse do we use to put these images on the main page? --74.13.127.194 (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Length & reference verified. Though I would recommend an alt hook commenting on the general plot line and mentioning that its nominated for an Oscar. The fact that it was nominated and lost alone doesn't seem very catchy. AgneCheese/Wine 10:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, this was the only time that two Japanese directors were in direct competition against each other for the Foreign Film Oscar. Kumai's film was the Japanese entry, but Kurosawa's film was the USSR entry (Dersu Uzala was a Soviet-Japanese co-production). But since the length and reference for this hook check out, I will leave well enough alone. :) Ecoleetage (talk) 12:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hico, Texas: "Where Everybody Is Somebody"
  • Article not expanded five fold. Was around 2,477 bytes on July 13th and is now only around 8,190 bytes of pure article text. It needs to get closer to 12,385 to qualify. AgneCheese/Wine 22:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, hook and date verified. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The offline ref can be accepted in good faith but like stages of growth model this one technically falls outside the date parameters with its being newly created on July 14th and not expanded fivefold from its state 5 days ago. It also has some clean up tags that call for attention. AgneCheese/Wine 10:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Technicality. Don't we claim Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy? If not, then do note that the article was officially destubbed in the proper period for DYK. So it's fine :) Seriously, we should encourage and reward new editors (like the ones who created this article) with things like DYK, and act less as a bureaucracy (5 seconds after 24h deadline... rejected). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the stages of growth model describes the changing role of information technology in organizations? ----article by various authors (see 5 authors listed here as Group 4), expanded severalfold over the past few days. If there are comments on what needs to be improved in this article for it to be DYKed, please copy the comments to article's talk page. It was created as an educational assignments and the students may not be aware of the custom of commenting at this template talk. Nom by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:22, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The offline reference can be accepted in good faith. However, the article is technically ineligible due to not being a true five fold expansion in the last 5 days. It's been a work in progress since July 16th. AgneCheese/Wine 10:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the sexual script is a sociological analysis of what leads up to sexual intercourse? ----article by various authors (see 5 authors listed here as Group 2). If there are comments on what needs to be improved in this article for it to be DYKed, please copy the comments to article's talk page. It was created as an educational assignments and the students may not be aware of the custom of commenting at this template talk. Nom by --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length verified; offline ref accepted on good faith. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, let's hold off on this one until there are in-text cites, per the tag. Daniel Case (talk) 15:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the article has enough inline refs for the hook.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article not expanded five fold. Mastrchf (t/c) 20:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length and reference verified. Not quite fivefold, but this was a well-enough-done job that I feel we can be a little lenient. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Didn't find any reference to the herbal tea or the Guarijo in cited source. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a link directly to the page of The Trees of Sonora, Mexico. I formatted the references section somewhat differently this time, and perhaps you were looking at Contributions from the U. S. National Herbarium? « D. Trebbien (talk) 23:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on July 24

How are these unique? The article doesn't seem to make this claim, and Mappa mundi are also circular world maps with many similar features. The article itself acknowledges the potential Western influences. Can the hook state the explicit features which are unique to this style of map perhaps? Benea (talk) 12:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The article is really still a stub, with only a single source, and makes claims "such as 'produced in Korea only'" which really need more than a single source (which doesn't even use wording quite that strong). --Elonka 17:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Too short (only 1000 bytes of main body text) and as Elonka says, claims like "only produced in Korea" need to be cited. Gatoclass (talk) 04:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad, I thought 1000 bytes was OK for DYKs... The sources for "only produced in Korea" is Oh Sang-Hak Circular World Maps of the Joseon Dynasty, KOREA JOURNAL, Spring 2008 (p. 10, first para) "...no identical world maps have been in China or Japan...". Cheers PHG (talk) 08:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that young Heliobolus lugubris lizards imitate certain ground beetles which squirt a pungent acid in defense? (self nom) [note: Eremias lugubris, given in the source, is an obsolete name for the lizard] Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 01:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Expansion length verified. The wording of the hook is a little odd in regards to the article & referencing. Reading the hook at face value it appears to say that the one of the ways that the lizards imitate ground beetles is by squirting a pungent acid in defense. However the article and reference only say that the lizards imitate the beetles in their coloring and movement. At closer inspection, it looks like the hook is trying to combine two separate interesting facts in a cumbersome way that encourages confusion. I recommend rewording the hook with the simplest solution being dropping the pungent acid defense. However, you may want to explore a new hook regarding Charles Darwin's work and interaction with the beetles. The name recognition would add to the "catchiness". AgneCheese/Wine 22:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm going to hazard a tentative guess that the relevance of the acid-spitting is that the lizards imitate beetles so potential predators will avoid them for fear of the acid - in the same way many insects imitate the colouring of wasps to benefit from other creatures' fear of stings. If I'm right then the hook could probably stand to be clarified, since at first reading I too thought it was saying the lizards spat acid (indeed, the article itself would benefit from the information). If on the other hand I'm pulling things out of my ass, then I concur with Agne's suggestion. Olaf Davis | Talk 23:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, That's it precisely. I was being overly curt and hence unclear in the proposal because I wanted to be brief, and the lizard has no article yet (so linking it would be pointless). If anyone has an idea how to better phrase it, fire right away. (FYI, there are some geckos that imitate scorpions, and I have not found any other case of mimicry of terrestrial invertebrates by terrestrial vertebrates. I left the wording in the article somewhat more open as I am only 98% sure I checked out all that has been published on that topic.)
As to Darwin, Bombardier beetle has the misinterpretation that it was one of those critters, so that would need to be corrected. After copyediting Ground beetle I needed a break from these critters so I merely added a warning. For that reason, I did not suggest the Darwin story as a DYK; I would have done it otherwise. So if you think the Darwin stories have DYK material, that's cool also. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 23:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So how about:
  • ... that young Heliobolus lugubris lizards imitate certain acid-squirting ground beetles in order to scare off predators? or
  • ... that young Heliobolus lugubris lizards imitate the colouring and behaviour of certain acid-squirting ground beetles in order to scare off predators?
Dysmorodrepanis, does the reference you used mention that? If so perhaps you could add half a sentence to that effect, and if not we can go with the Darwin hook. Olaf Davis | Talk 10:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not the most exciting, but I may make this a triple hook, so I thought I'd get the process started.--Bedford Pray 01:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Text counter was down, but Schofield House should be long enough.--Bedford Pray 12:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is: 2,064 bytes of readable prose. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 12:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Added a third new article.--Bedford Pray 13:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What's special about this day? Was it a Friday? --74.14.16.90 (talk) 00:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing especially notable about the day. The hook could stand without the date, if there is a need to be shortened.--Bedford Pray 00:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We have a clear consensus on the discussion page that bare urls are no longer acceptable, so you will need to fix them first. Gatoclass (talk) 06:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, the troll has been fed. Of course, we now are encouraging trolling, and trying to hinder people making articles, but the troll is fed. Recheck it.--Bedford Pray 07:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not call your fellow DYKers trolls. It's disrespectful, and enforcing community consensus is hardly troll like. Vickser (talk) 07:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't call them trolls; I'm calling them troll-feeders. The whole reason this rule was made was to discriminate against me. Now, future trolls have a precedent that they can look to and inspire to. There were also very few bare hooks; most were book referenced.--Bedford Pray 07:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alt hook ... that session steel guitarist Lloyd Green learned to play Hawaiian guitar by age seven and graduated to the steel guitar that he played professionally in clubs by age ten? (alt nom) ww2censor (talk) 14:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see, the article name wasn't bolded. I've fixed that. Jayjg (talk) 00:04, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Congregation Beth Israel (Honesdale, Pennsylvania) needs to be expanded from <600 characters to >1500 characters. --74.14.16.90 (talk) 00:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on July 23

  • Looks like a considerable degree of plagiarism in this article. Can't be featured until editor puts the information in his own words. Gatoclass (talk) 14:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please clarify the plagiarism part so that I can remove them or avoid them in my future articles. I have used only referenced material in the article and photos which are already available in other wiki articles.--Nvvchar (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
List's intro text is too short. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still just 44 characters too short. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You don't have to condemn it, Daniel. There's still time for me to expand it further; that should be a possible vote symbol. Mess around with the guy in shades all you like - don't mess around with the girl in gloves! (talk) 21:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have expanded it further, and the main body is now at 1522 characters. Are there any other problems that need to be fixed? Mess around with the guy in shades all you like - don't mess around with the girl in gloves! (talk) 21:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length verified; offline ref accepted on good faith. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I request that this article no longer be considered for DYK as the editor has admitted to making nonsense edits purely for the goal of getting this article in DYK with the proper count number, including an attempt at a revert war from a legible and more accurate interpretation of a scientific article.[1] In addition the editor is making personal attacks in edit summaries on this article in order to obtain her stated trophy of 5000 DYK edits at any cost.[2] She has also resorted to personal attacks in her reversions while removing purposeful careful edits in order to get the word count right so she can score a DYK point.[3][4] I will also request the editor be banned from contributing to DYK for some time until this attitude changes. --Blechnic (talk) 04:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think 3 and 4 are that bad (how is #4 a personal attack?). My biggest problem is using so-called "leet speak". I can sympathize with trying to get to 1500 characters, but she needs to leanr to bloviate better. Also, 5000? I have the fifth-most of anyone ever in DYK creation, and I'm only at 152, and the highest is only in the 200s. It is long before she needs to bother getting to 5000, which would take at least a dozen years to do.--Bedford Pray 05:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately because the references are offline and I don't have access to them, there is no way for me to tell how accurate the respective positions are. So basically, this looks like a content dispute. There is also obviously growing tension between these two editors, which is making it difficult for them to work together productively. However, since there is clearly a dispute here about the accuracy of the article, I don't think we can promote it until the dispute is resolved. Gatoclass (talk) 05:14, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If the DYK creation record is in the 200's, then 5000 can't be a serious goal. It has to be a joke, probably implying that more serious further explanation would be unhelpful. Art LaPella (talk) 05:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
split from other article? Where? Is this a 5x expansion? --74.14.16.88 (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Much of the content came from the article NHL Rivalries. I split it off to its own article, cleaned it up, sourced it, and removed POV and un-encyclopedic statements. I think this still qualifies for DYK, but correct me if I'm wrong. Random89 19:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Reference verified. The article is not a 5 five fold expansion because the vast majority of the text is taken from the NHL Rivalries article. If we have a shortage of hook and are in a pinch, this one is a maybe. I do think we should revisit the issue at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. I can see strong points for including splinter articles that have been substantially cleaned up but not quite 5x expanded. However, I do think they should be lower on the totem pole to articles that have been written from scratch or truly 5x expanded. But it is something that should be part of a larger consensus discussion. AgneCheese/Wine 21:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I had really no idea if this was acceptable when I suggested it, because the text itself has most definitely not been 5x expanded, but technically it is a new article. I do belive thought that this fits the spirit of DYK, because the information in the new article is presented in a way for more friendly to a reader linked from the main page, with little background knowledge, than was the previous section of the larger article. I'm sure there are plenty of cases like this, so I agree that maybe a larger discussion should take place. Random89 08:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that Bao Jinghowlal's middle name, Davis, was the last name of an American solider that befriended his family during the US occupation of Yap? Soccahdude1122 (talk) 05:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Too short in what way? A bit of descriptiveness might help matters. - Hexhand (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gatoclass means that the main body of the article, which excludes the images and their captions, the list of sources, and the "See also" section, is too short. The smallest an article can be to be truly Start-class, and ready for DYK, is 1500 bytes in the main body, this article's only got about 1235. There's still time to expand it up to the desired length, however. But as a side-note, you might wish to tweak the hook you have provided, as "of every four, more than three..." sounds strange; with four being the maximum limit given, isn't the only full number larger than three four? Good luck, though! Mess around with the guy in shades all you like - don't mess around with the girl in gloves! (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I have since fixed the nom, expanded the article to 26kb, and found a boatload of info about the contamination of the British pound as well. A word to the wise: stop licking bank notes. Yuck-o. - Hexhand (talk) 00:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Plenty long enough now. I am verifying in spite of the fact that the refs. need registration, as at least one article summary more or less confirms it. My only quibble would be that I would be happier if it was phrased "that studies have shown" as most of the studies seem to have been quite small, ie, to make it something like "that studies have shown that three out of every four U.S. dollar bills are contaminated by cocaine or another illicit drug?" Gatoclass (talk) 02:38, 27 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]
Done, though I was under the impression that the article title had to be in the DYK. Did I misread that?- Hexhand (talk) 03:06, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. The article title does have to be bolded and linked, but [[contaminated currency|contaminated]] accomplishes that. The unpiped article title is sometimes preferred, but not always required, and it isn't a written (or Unwritten) rule. Art LaPella (talk) 03:17, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay; just want to point out that the rules, unwritten or otherwise, don't list that as an option. Thanks for the input. :)- Hexhand (talk) 06:02, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. Fixed. Art LaPella (talk) 04:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Since another user claims to have just caught Hexhand making a large copyvio to this article, it will have to be thoroughly checked before it is promoted. I don't currently have time to do that, so I'm changing my vote from verified to possible in the meantime. Gatoclass (talk) 08:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe before besmirching my rep, maybe you could actually look into the matter before passing judgment, Gat. Poor form. - Hexhand (talk) 14:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See here - the expansion was done by copying text from two newspaper articles, with some minor alterations which Hexhand (in good faith I believe, but mistakenly) thought were enough to stop it being a copyright violation. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 21:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the good faith, Iaian. :) I've reworked that material bearing similarities, found alternative (and more) citations, removing the possibility of copyvio. Might we reinstate this DYK, please? - Hexhand (talk) 17:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, I think it still follows source too closely in the Britain section, as Iain suggested above. Rewrite that section and it might be okay for DYK. Gatoclass (talk) 15:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are incorrect. The section has been heavily rewritten, added to and cross-sourced. As I have asked you twice on your talk page, please point out where you think it "follows source too closely" (on my user talk page, if you wish). - Hexhand (talk) 18:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've done some further rewriting of one of sections which caused problems; subject to the section on Hepatitis C being reworked or removed I think it should be OK now, though a look from another pair of eyes wouldn't go amiss. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 21:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't this common? -74.14.18.205 (talk) 02:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article's hook is unsourced or too long or there are other content issues Yes, it is very common. Length and date verified. The hook? Not so much. The hook is about something too common and it is overall not interesting. Please try to find a different hook. Regards, RyRy (talk) 10:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also