Hanafites

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Abu Hanifa Mosque in Baghdad

The Hanafites or Hanefites ( Arabic الحنفية, DMG al-ḥanafīya ) are one of the four schools of law ( Madhāhib ) of Sunni Islam . They go back to Abū Hanīfa an-Nuʿmān ibn Thābit (also called al-Imām al-Aʿẓām 'the greatest Imam ' by the followers ), but above all to his disciple Abu Yusuf and al-Shaibani .

The Hanafi school of law has been predominant in Sunni Islam since the end of the Umayyad period : it is the most widespread school of law, followed by around half of the Sunnis . As a rule, they are followers of the Maturidiyya movement in the theological field .

  • Regions in which Hanafis make up the majority
  • History and dissemination

    The Hanafi school of law had spread first in the area of ​​Iraq - the sphere of activity of Abu Hanifa - but then also in the area of ​​ancient Syria ( Arabic الشام asch-Shām , called DMG aš-Šām ), which extended further than today's Syria . Since the time of the Seljuks , the Hanafi school of law waspreferred by the statein the Syrian and Anatolian areas (today's Turkey ). Since the Maliki law school was not at all represented in these areas and the other law schools were not well represented, this support gave the Hanafis a strong boost and ensured widespread use among the population.

    In the Ottoman Empire , finally, the Hanafi school was the "Constitutional Law School" raised, that is to that law school was tuned to the all-in state and society. The Ottoman nickname "legislator" ( Kanuni ) received Suleiman when he under the Chief Mufti Mehmet Abu Saud Efendi was create (Mehmet Ebussuud Efendi) guidelines on how the Sharia and the principle, to ban the right to command and what is wrong , in the practice of state reality should be implemented. In the Ottoman Empire, the government set up a mufti for each province ( Eyâlet ) .

    The situation was similar in the Mughal Empire , especially under the rule of the devout Muhammad Aurangzeb Alamgir . He insisted on strict observance of the laws of the Koran, particularly the moral laws. More important, however, were the attempts to enforce Hanafi law in public. Aurangzeb had an extensive and still significant collection of Hanafi laws ( fatawa-i alamgiri / Fataawa al Hindiyya ) created to support Islamic jurisprudence and, according to Islamic legal understanding , abolished inadmissible taxes. About 500 legal scholars worked on this set of laws. In return, Aurangzeb had the jizya recovered (from 1679); Hindus also had to pay customs duties twice as high as Muslims. In addition, Aurangzeb's measures to Islamize the empire affected not only those of different faiths, but also Muslims who deviated from the commandments of the Hanafis. However, the collection of legal questions was not fully completed until after Aurangzeb's death.

    For a long time there was a provision in the Criminal Code of Egypt according to which a death sentence passed by the civil court - and no longer by the Shari'a Court - only became final with the consent of the mufti and taking into account the legal teachings of the Hanafis.

    The Hanafi school of law is therefore widespread today in all successor states of the Ottoman Empire. They make up the majority among all those Sunnis who belong to the Turkic peoples (including the Turks themselves), as well as among the Sunnis of the Asian mainland east of Iran, i.e. in Afghanistan , Pakistan , Turkmenistan , India , China , Uzbekistan , Kazakhstan , as well as in South Africa . The Sunni minority in Iran is also largely Hanafi.

    They also make up the majority among the Sunnis in Iraq , Jordan and Lebanon . There are larger Hanafi minorities in Syria, Egypt and Palestine . The Hanafi school of law is also predominant in the European areas where Muslims have lived since the time of the Ottoman Empire, i.e. in the Balkans , especially Bosnia , Sandžak , Albania , Kosovo , North Macedonia , Romania , Serbia , Bulgaria and Greece .

    particularities

    Sources and methods of legal finding

    The main sources recognized by the Hanafi school of law are (in descending order): Quran , Sunna , Ijma , Qiyas and the Ra'y ( istihsan )

    Here, Qiyas and Istihsan took the early form of Hanafiya opposite as two contrasting solutions, of which the mujtahid selects the one that seems to him better because of his knowledge and experience:

    • Qiyas is the conclusion by analogy here, which derives the solution to a legal problem from the treatment of comparable problems in the Koran, Sunna or Ijma.
    • Istihsan (literally: to regard something as good), on the other hand, is the rejection of a new qiya . If, while working out a possible qiyas, the mujahid finds that the final result does not correspond to the meaning of the Sharia or that the possible qiyas does not mean an improvement in law, he replaces the possible qiyas with a free ra'y.

    The strong emphasis on qiyas and istihsan in the early years of the Hanafis was so important because in the time of Abu Hanifa too many weak and forged hadiths were in circulation and there was no real system for determining the correct one ( saheeh ) among them.

    As a result, the law school used more sources during Abu Hanifa's lifetime than after his death. After his death, Abu Hanifa's main pupil, the scholars Abu Yusuf and Muhammad asch-Schaibani ( the two imams ) had a decisive influence on the further development of the school of law. Another influential disciple of Abu Hanifa was Zufar ibn al-Hudhail .

    Unlike Abu Hanifa, Abu Yusuf and Muhammad ash-Shaybani went more into the hadith basis. This was made possible by the fact that there was now a catalog of hadiths recognized as “real” ( sahih ). On this basis, they revised and replaced many of Abu Hanifa's decisions. Today's Hanafi school of law therefore follows the opinion of Abu Yusuf and ash-Shaybani on many issues and not the original opinion of Abu Hanifa. Today the Istihsan is no longer used in the form in which Abu Hanifa used it. Also is Ra'y (freedom of expression of the mujtahid who is not dependent on direct evidence from legal sources) now very rarely used.

    The "legislative" Sultan Suleyman I, who fundamentally canonized the legal system in the Ottoman Empire on Hanafi law.

    In particular, Muhammad asch-Shaybani gave the hadith as a source of jurisprudence, a priority over the ra'y in finding the law, and thus differed from the methodology of his teacher Abu Hanifa. His al-Jāmiʿ al-kabīr  /الجامع الكبير / al-Ǧāmiʿ al-kabīr  / 'The great summary (work)' deals with the derived legal clauses of Islamic jurisprudence (furūʿ) and has since been commented on several times, discussed within the law school and used as teaching material. It handles a large number of legal cases with concise decisions. Comments and abstracts of the work are available in later revisions. The judges had to know the 1532 legal clauses by heart when issuing and notarizing their decisions and used them accordingly.

    A peculiarity of the Hanafis in the legal system is that they regard the area of ​​punishment ( ʿuqūbāt ) as a unit compared to other areas of law and have delimited this area from other areas of law in procedural law.

    Evaluation categories of actions

    The Hanafi school of law divides human actions into six assessment categories ( ahkām ):

    1. dutiful acts: (فرض fard orواجب wajib ) - this act is rewarded, failure to do so is punished. A distinction is made between personal duties (فرض العين fard al-ʿayn ), which every Muslim must obey , and communal duties (فرض الكفاية fard al-kifāya `` duty to do the job ''), in which it is sufficient if a sufficient number of Muslims participate. The first category includes e.g. B. five times daily prayer (صلاة, Koranic صلوة salad ), in the second jihad .
    2. Recommended actions: (مندوب mandūb orمستحب mustahabb orسنة sunna ) - this action is rewarded, failure to do so is not punished.
    3. permitted, indifferent actions: (مباح mubāh or halāl ) - the individual himself can decide whether to omit or carry out an act. The law does not provide for reward or punishment in this case.
    4. reprehensible, deprecated act: (مكروه makrūh ) - they are actions that the law does not punish, but whose omission is praised.
    5. serious reprehensible and disapproved act that is close to the prohibition. ( makrūh tahriman ) - There are acts, among other things, that involve failure to perform a wajib act. ("Karaha tahrimijja")
    6. Prohibited act: (حرام haraam ) - the perpetrator is punished, those who fail to do so are praised.

    Legal ritual provisions

    A peculiarity of the Hanafi madhhab in the area of ​​purity regulations is that running water must be used for the ablutions before the prayer, because this alone is regarded as ritually cleansing. This is where the Hanafis differ in particular from the Shafiites , who accept stagnant water as pure if it has a certain minimum volume. Here they refer to a prophetic word , according to which water, if it has the volume of two vessels (qulla), does not absorb any impurity. In contrast, the Hanafis reject this hadith as inauthentic. The Arabic name Ḥanafīya for water tap is also traced back to the need for the Hanafis to clean themselves with running water before praying.

    international law

    The Hanafi is the only one of the four Sunni schools of law to determine the circumstances under which an area belonging to the House of War ( Dār al-Harb ) becomes a part of the House of Islam ( Dār al-Islām or: Dār as-Salām ) and vice versa. The term does not appear in the Koran, but goes back to Abu Hanifa . In contrast to the other schools of law, the Hanafi judgment does not temporarily limit a peace treaty ( Hudna ).

    According to generally accepted regulations, an area becomes the House of Islam if it is under Islamic rule and Islamic law, the Sharia , is applied there. With regard to when an area previously belonging to the House of Islam is to be considered part of the House of War , Abu Hanifa set the following conditions, which still dominate the law school to this day:

    1. The law of the unbelievers is applied, Islamic laws lose their validity;
    2. The respective area borders on the House of War;
    3. The original guarantee of protection for the life and property of Muslims and dhimmis will be revoked, regardless of whether the new ruler gives them protection or not.

    These conditions can be met if part of the House of Islam is conquered or a group of dhimmis cancels their contract with the Muslims.

    The principle was applied in the Hanafi-influenced states of the Abbasids , Mamluks , Seljuks , in the Mughal Empire especially under Aurangzeb and under the Ottomans.

    The Ottoman Empire , which was primarily a military state from the beginning, with the aim of expanding the "Empire of Islam" ( Dār al-Islām ) by conquering territories of deviating beliefs ( Dār al-Harb ), acted and justified this principle up to the Tanzimat . According to critics, the Dar al Harb was subject to the legal fiction in the Ottoman Empire that the state of war with the subjugated had not yet ended. Therefore the state of war, the jihad , was perpetuated , whereby the continued existence of the population is left to the discretion of the respective ruler.

    Criminal law

    In the area of ​​criminal law, a specialty of the Hanafis is that they time-limit the prosecution of Hadd offenses . With the exception of libel for fornication ( qadhf ), according to their teaching, Hadd offenses can no longer be punished after one month has passed. They also like to make use of the concept of "appearance" ( šubha ) to avert Hadd punishments. For example, in the event that a couple who had committed zinā could assume that a legal marriage had taken place between them, the hadd penalty is averted by the concept of "appearance of a contract" ( šubhat al-ʿaqd ). In the case of theft ( sariqa ), the minimum value ( niṣāb ) that the stolen property must have for a hadd offense is 29.7 grams of silver, which is much higher than the other law schools (8.91 grams of silver).

    Recognition as a religious community in Austria

    The Hanafis were legally recognized in Austria on the basis of the law of July 15, 1912 regarding the recognition of followers of Islam according to the Hanafi rite as a religious society ( RGBl. No. 159/1912). Since then, Hanafi Islam has been one of the recognized religious communities in Austria and is placed on a par with the Christian churches and the Jewish communities . The law came into force on August 10, 1912. The Islam Law confirms and strengthens the state recognition of Islam as a religion by Austria , which has existed since 1874 . In Europe at that time Austria was a leader in relation to Islam.

    Emperor Franz Joseph drew the consequences of his expansion policy with the Islam law : in 1878 the Habsburg monarchy had actually annexed Bosnia-Herzegovina ( formal annexation only in 1908) - and thereby made a large number of Muslims citizens of the monarchy.

    Emperor Franz Joseph also approved the construction of a mosque in Vienna and donated 250,000 gold crowns . Vienna's mayor Karl Lueger provided a plot of land on Laaer Berg for this purpose . However, the First World War prevented the mosque from being built. After the collapse of the dual monarchy, only a few Muslims remained in Austria (fewer than 1,000).

    With effect from March 24, 1988, the phrase “according to the Hanafi rite” in Article 1 and in Sections 5 and 6 was repealed as unconstitutional in the Islamic Law, thus extending the validity of the law to all Muslims. Since then, the long title of the law has been "Law of July 15, 1912, regarding the recognition of followers of Islam as a religious society " (cf. Federal Law Gazette No. 164/1988).

    The law expired on March 30, 2015 and was replaced on the same day by the " Islam Law 2015 " (see Federal Law Gazette I No. 39/2015 ).

    List of well-known Hanafi scholars

    See also

    literature

    • Christopher Melchert: "How Ḥanafism came to originate in Kufa and traditionalism in Medina." in Islamic Law and Society 6 (1999) 318-47.
    • Marriage law, family law and inheritance law of the Mohamedans according to the Hanefite rite. From the imperial and royal court and state printing works, Vienna 1883.
    • Muhammad Abu Zahra : Abu Hanifa. Diyanet publication 1999, ISBN 975-19-1869-3 .
    • Nicola Melis: Trattato sulla guerra. Il Kitab al-Gihad di Molla Hüsrev Aipsa, Cagliari 2002, ISBN 88-87636-40-0 .

    Web links

    Footnotes

    1. The Great Handbook of Islam. (New translation of "Ilmihal" by Ö. N. Bilmen). Astec, Bochum 2012, ISBN 978-605-8752-51-1 .
    2. mb-soft.com:Maturidi
    3. ^ Fischer world history. Volume 17, pp. 258 ff.
    4. JND Anderson: Law Reform in the Muslim World . London 1976, p. 18.
    5. The Great Handbook of Islam. (New translation of "Ilmihal" by Ö. N. Bilmen). Astec, Bochum 2012, ISBN 978-605-8752-51-1 .
    6. Muhammad Abu Zahra: Abu Hanifa. Publication 1999, ISBN 975-19-1869-3 .
    7. Ahmad A. Reidegeld: Handbuch Islam. Spohr-Verlag 2005, ISBN 3-927606-28-6 .
    8. ^ F. Sezgin (1967), pp. 423-428 with numerous comments
    9. ^ J. Dimitrov: Asch-Schaibānī and his Corpus juris al-ǧāmiʿ aṣṣaġīr. In: Communications from the Seminar for Oriental Languages ​​(MSOS) 9 (1908), pp. 60–206.
    10. Baber Johansen: Contingency in a Sacred Law. Legal and Ethical Norms in the Muslim Fiqh . Suffering u. a. 1999, p. 422.
    11. ^ German information service on Islam, methodology for determining Islamic provisions from the Koran and Sunna, Samir Mourad - Said Toumi. 2nd Edition.
    12. ↑ on this Tilman Nagel: The Fortress of Faith. Triumph and Failure of Islamic Rationalism. Munich 1988, p. 182.
    13. al-Hilli : Muntahā al-maṭlab fī taḥqīq al-maḏhab. Mašhad 1412q. Volume I, p. 35.
    14. ^ Mawil Izzi Dien: The Environmental Dimensions of Islam . Cambridge 2000, p. 33.
    15. "Dar Al-Islam And Dar Al-Harb: Its Definition and Significance" by Ahmed Khalil, upper third
    16. For details, see: Rudolph Peters: Islam and Colonialism. The doctrine of Jihad in Modern History . Mouton Publishers, 1979, p. 33 f.
    17. Rudolph Peters: Islam and Colonialism. The doctrine of Jihad in Modern History . Mouton Publishers, 1979, p. 12.
    18. Alan Palmer: Decline and Fall of the Ottoman Empire. Heyne, Munich 1994 (Original: London 1992), pp. 1-448, pp. 51ff
    19. ^ Basilike D. Papoulia: Origin and essence of the 'boy picking' in the Ottoman Empire. Munich 1963, p. 52.
    20. ^ Rudolph Peters: Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law. Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, p. 11.
    21. ^ Peters 23.