Necla Kelek

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Necla Kelek (2010)

Necla Kelek [ ˈnɛdʒla ˈkɛlɛk ] (born December 31, 1957 in Istanbul , Turkey ) is a German sociologist and journalist of Turkish- Circassian descent. With many current journalistic articles and her books The Foreign Bride , The Lost Sons , Bittersweet Heimat and Himmelsreise, she continues to shape the debate about integration and Islam in Germany to this day. She is active as a prominent women's rights activist on the board of Terre des Femmes . She has been awarded several prizes, such as the Geschwister-Scholl Prize in 2005 and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation's Freedom Prize in 2011 for freedom .

family

Necla Kelek grew up with two brothers and a sister in Kadiköy , a neighborhood on the Asian side of Istanbul . At that time, Kemal Ataturk introduced the separation of state and religion and equal rights for men and women. Neither the state nor the society in Istanbul attached importance to a religious Islamic lifestyle. Kelek's family lived far from religious norms and regulations.

Kelek describes her family history in the book The Foreign Bride . Her family, who lived a western-secular lifestyle in Istanbul, belonged to the Turkish- Circassian minority in Turkey . She describes her childhood as carefree, at school she was one of the best in class. In 1964 the father went to Vienna for a year to work, then to Germany. In 1966 he brought his family to join him. The father had increasing difficulties with the freedom of his children, especially his daughters, and ultimately left the family in 1973.

Kelek has had German citizenship since 1994. She lives in Berlin with her partner and son.

Scientific career and activities

Kelek initially trained as a technical draftsman . On her second educational path, she obtained the university entrance qualification and began studying economics at the Hamburg University of Economics and Politics from 1979 , and then from 1984 onwards to study social sciences at the University of Hamburg . 2001 she was at the University of Greifswald and the University of Hamburg with an investigation into Islamic religion and its importance in the everyday world of students of Turkish origin to Dr. Phil. PhD . From 1999 to 2004 she was a lecturer in migration sociology at the Evangelical University for Social Work & Diakonie in Hamburg . In addition to her work as a book author, she works as a freelance journalist for Die Welt , EMMA and as a guest author for the Mainzer Allgemeine Zeitung , the Speakers Corner of the Funke media group , the Neue Zürcher Zeitung , the axis of the good and other media companies.

She advised the Hamburg judicial authority on issues relating to the treatment of Turkish-Muslim prisoners and the Baden-Württemberg state government on Turkish customs and traditions as well as on their legislative initiative to formulate forced marriage as an independent criminal offense instead of a particularly serious case of coercion . From 2005 to 2009 she was a member of the annual Islam conference appointed by the federal government . Until May 16, 2007 she was a member of the scientific advisory board of the Giordano Bruno Foundation . She has been a member of the Senate of the German National Foundation since 2009 . Since 2009 Kelek has been a member of the board of trustees of the “Hildegard von Bingen Prize” foundation. In 2012 she became an active member of Terre des femmes (TdF) and has been on the board here since 2014. Since 2012 she has been in charge of a cooperation project of the association in southeastern Turkey, which is directed against violence in the name of honor and against forced marriage .

After Kelek in a radio interview with Deutschlandfunk u. a. had declared that granting the Islamic Ahmadiyya community the status of a corporation under public law was a "wrong decision", the community was acting "like a sect", it was using its status as a corporation under public law to push through "a political agenda", and was “not transparent” in their religious practice, the Ahmadiyya community brought a lawsuit against Kelek at the Frankfurt / M district court. At the end of February 2019, the lawsuit against Kelek was dismissed in the first instance on essential points by the Frankfurt Regional Court.

Book publications and reception

The strange bride

In her non-fiction book The Foreign Bride (2005) Kelek described her own experiences, researched the life stories of Turkish women and compared them with the results of scientific studies. Their conclusion was that Turkish tradition and Islamic religiosity can be an obstacle to integration. According to your book, many young people born in Germany are married to a bride or groom in their place of origin in Turkey in the phase of separation from their parents and they are then brought to Germany. Integration in Germany is deliberately made more difficult. Kelek uses the example of the “import bride” (Turkish: ithal gelin ), the woman brought from Turkey and migrated to Germany for an arranged marriage, who does not have any prerequisites there for integration into German society. To describe these facts, she evaluated interviews with affected women who told her their life stories.

The book became a bestseller and received critical acclaim in general. The emotionality of the book was felt by many reviewers as a strength. At the same time, however, generalized judgments were criticized for the entire population group of Turkish Muslims. According to journalist Patrick Bahners , the lack of differentiation can easily suggest the impression of “a dangerous crowd under the spell of archaic groupthink”. An example of a review that mixes praise and criticism in this way is that of Alexandra Senfft in the FAZ on May 31, 2005.

Kelek received the renowned Geschwister-Scholl Prize for The Foreign Bride . The eulogy held Heribert Prantl . According to Patrick Bahners, Prantl believed Kelek to have “a rhetorical strategy of exaggeration”. She made herself the organ of her mother and of all Turkish women whose screams were overheard. In order to shake up the public, she argued with generalizations. Prantl saw the value of the book in the unity of life and work: She settled with Islam, how she experienced and suffered it.

The prodigal sons

In her publication The Lost Sons (2006), Kelek discussed the influence of Islam on the nuclear family. The book is based on a research project by Keleks on the subject of parallel society at the Protestant University of Applied Sciences for Social Education in Hamburg. Here, too, Kelek added biographical details, observations, discussions with Turkish pensioners and the non-representative results from interviews with Turkish inmates.

Positions

Kelek expressly does not profess Islam as a religion and rejects the term Muslim for himself. She sees Islam “as a culture” to which she belongs, and herself primarily as a German citizen. The current “rigid and reactionary” Islam, which dates back to the 11th century, does not belong to Germany, but the Muslims living here do. A development of Islam and a historicizing use of the Koran is only possible in Europe.

Kelek's main topic is “the Islamic parallel society in Germany”. It rejects a toleration of a non-emancipatory upbringing of girls, but also of boys, in traditionalist Muslim families as “misunderstood tolerance”.

Kelek often gives interviews and takes a political stance, often in a pointed form. In the taz of January 16, 2006, for example, she advocated the controversial naturalization test of the Baden-Württemberg state government, which she described as the "Pascha test". Regarding the study on violence against women in Germany presented by Family Minister Renate Schmidt in 2004, she said: “According to investigations by the Federal Ministry of Family Affairs, at least every second Turkish woman is married in the manner described. So there are several thousand cases each year. ”However, the study does not cover Kelek's numerical estimate.

Kelek supported Ralph Giordano's concerns about the construction of the central mosque in Cologne-Ehrenfeld . She led u. a. from the fact that an Islam is practiced in many mosques in Germany, which turns out to be an obstacle to integration. These mosques are the germ cells of an opposing society. There the worldview of another society is taught and a life in the sense of Sharia is practiced. Even children would learn to differentiate from German society there.

Kelek explained in an interview in 2010 that Islam constructs an image of man that denies people and especially men the ability to control their sexuality and a pronounced instinctuality. This image of man is the result of an appropriate education. The Islamic scholar Lamya Kaddor accused Kelek of having long since left the ground of serious, let alone scientifically founded criticism of Islam with her pointed remarks on the subject . Kelek assumes that Muslim men have “a general tendency to sodomy”. The quote from Kelek quoted by Kaddor turned out to be inaccurate. Since Kaddor did not withdraw her allegations despite repeated requests from Kelek, Kelek filed an injunction against this in May 2018 . In December 2018, the Berlin Regional Court sentenced Kaddor to omit the allegations against Kelek. At the hearing, the judge said that Kelek's statements were easy to understand and in no way referred to Muslim men in general .

In the dispute with Islamic fundamentalists, Kelek calls for a “historical-critical handling of the traditional scriptures”, since otherwise the “peace-loving Muslims ... will be helpless in argumentation against the fundamentalists as long as they are not ready to also use the Koran as a historical text that is to be questioned and to regard the doubt as legitimate ”. In addition, she refers to the urgent need, in her opinion, that “we Muslims” have to deal with Islamism as part of Islam: “Just as the Nazis belonged to Germany, the terrorists belong to the Umma , Islamism is part of Islam . "

Kelek already dealt with the circumcision of boys in The Prodigal Sons and rejects this. Since November 2017 she has therefore been the "ambassador" of the intaktiv eV association . on.

Necla Kelek is one of the first signatories of the founding document of the u. a. “Initiative secular Islam” launched by Seyran Ateş , Cem Özdemir , Hamed Abdel-Samad and Ahmed Mansour at the end of 2018, with which a “contemporary understanding of Islam” should be heard.

Petition "Justice for Muslims!"

Shortly before the publication of Kelek's family-sociological study in mid-March 2006, the weekly newspaper Die Zeit published an open letter on February 2, 2006, called a petition , on integration policy in Germany, which had been signed by 60 scientists from the social science department in general and migration research in particular ; The authors were the Bremen professor for intercultural education Yasemin Karakaşoğlu and the Cologne psychologist and journalist Mark Terkessidis .

Criticism of Kelek

The open letter was directed against, among other things, Kelek's prominent position in the official political discourse and accused her of working unscientificly. While Kelek was still doing serious research in her dissertation , she now generalizes - contrary to her research results at the time - in her book and her newspaper articles, individual cases regarding exemplary generic characteristics of Muslim migrants. The existence of forced marriages and " honor killings " is in no way denied , but arranged marriages (which are to be distinguished from forced marriages) are due, among other things, to the emergence of marriage markets between the country of origin and the migration destination, which in turn are "the result of Europe's policy of isolation"; so they are often motivated by the desire for legal immigration. This could not be seen if one - like Kelek for example - generally imposed a pattern of interpretation of the general comparison of "Islam" and "Western civilization" on the phenomena.

Kelek's reply

In the same issue of the newspaper, Kelek was given the opportunity to make a replica, which was also printed by the taz . She accused the signatories of the petition for arguing unscientific. Regardless of the real conditions, these represent the illusion of the successful integration of Muslim migrants. Despite events daily contradicting this view, the representatives of the academic majority tried to criticize the bearer of the bad news rather than their own views and “ideological concept of multiculturalism ”. She sharpened her reply by accusing the "critic from the well-funded world of publicly funded migration research" for having been responsible for the failure of integration policy for 30 years. The real purpose of their objection is "fear for their research funds".

Media reactions

In the daily newspapers FAZ and Die Welt , editorial articles appeared that clearly supported Kelek's positions. The taz admitted consecutively a sharp critic of Kelek Kelek and even place one. After that, only negative contributions were given in the taz . Various statements were also published in the Frankfurter Rundschau , including a Kelek largely supportive guest contribution by Rahel Volz from Terre des Femmes and a text by Mark Terkessidis, who defended the "Petition" as a co-author. The NZZ of February 11, 2006 was rather critical of both sides. The FAZ of February 9, 2006 criticized the fact that in the “petition from 60 migration researchers” only a fifth of the social scientists were active in the field of migration research on Turks.

Necla Kelek and Seyran Ateş received support from Hartmut Krauss , an Osnabrück editor and initiator of the Critical Marxist Working Group, whose “countercall” with the title “Justice for democratic critics of Islam” from 53 people (including journalists, scientists, engineers, authors and human rights activists , the latter mainly from Iraq and Iran). It says that honor killings, forced marriages and a basic patriarchal orientation as well as anti-Jewish conspiracy ideologies and a lack of respect for a secular-democratic social order are "serious and not marginal phenomena within the Islamic cultural community". Therefore, an “undifferentiated general amnesty for all Muslims” is prohibited. The main criticism of the attitude of the “migration scientists” is that negative phenomena in migrants are always derived from the “racism of the host society”, while the anti-emancipatory potential of Islam is ignored. As long as this is taboo, however, it is "badly in order to develop an appropriate integration discourse".

Alice Schwarzer defended Necla Kelek against the criticism in an article in the FAZ on February 11, 2006, which was reprinted in Emma ; she had bravely broken the silence on a social taboo. Schwarzer combined this statement with strong personal criticism of the authors of the open letter: Yasemin Karakaşoğlu was "very, very closely connected to the Islamist scene in Germany"; Mark Terkessidis is just a self-promoter and has "little to do with understanding the world".

The migration researcher Werner Schiffauer shared the content of the open letter, but had not signed it because, in his opinion, the German public should be the target of the criticism instead of Kelek: “One should not attack Necla Kelek, but the German public who only appear to be Waiting for someone like Kelek to confirm everything they have always thought about Muslims. ”He gave Kelek a positive credit for raising the previously neglected issue of family relationships in migrant families.

Legal proceedings

On February 6, 2020, the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court sentenced Necla Kelek to fail to state that the mosques of the Ahmadiyya religious community are “men's places”, as well as to state that the religious community uses its status to push through its political agenda. The Frankfurt Higher Regional Court has thus revised an earlier judgment in the legal dispute between Kelek and the Islamic community. The subject of the proceedings were allegations that Kelek had made in an interview with Deutschlandfunk in 2017. After this judgment, however, Kelek can continue to claim that Ahmadiyya is an "Islamic sect" as this is a permissible expression of opinion. The court also described the fact that the religious community wanted to "see Islam literally implemented" and did not deal sufficiently with "violence in the Koran" as permissible expressions of opinion.

Awards

Publications

Books

  • 2019: The Unholy Family. How the Islamic tradition disenfranchises women and children , Droemer, Munich, ISBN 978-3-426-27812-3 .
  • 2012: Hurriya means freedom: The Arab revolt and women - a journey through Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco , Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 978-3-462-04484-3
  • 2012: Chaos of Cultures: The Debate about Islam and Integration , Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 978-3-462-04428-7 .
  • 2010: Journey to Heaven. My dispute with the guardians of Islam , Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 978-3-462-04197-2 .
  • 2008: Bittersweet home. Report from the interior of Turkey , Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 978-3-462-04042-5 .
  • 2006: The Prodigal Sons. Plea for the liberation of the Turkish-Muslim man , Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 3-462-03686-6 .
  • 2005: The strange bride. A report from the interior of Turkish life in Germany , Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 3-462-03469-3 .
  • 2002: Islam in everyday life. Islamic religiosity and its meaning in the world of schoolchildren of Turkish origin , Waxmann, Münster, ISBN 3-8309-1169-6 (also dissertation at the University of Hamburg 2001).

Book contributions

  • 2016: The shock - New Year's Eve in Cologne: With contributions by Kamel Daoud, Necla Kelek, Bassam Tibi and others. a. Ed .: Alice Schwarzer . Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 978-3462049992 .
  • 2011: A trip to the distant homeland , in: The great veiling - For integration, against Islamism . Ed .: Alice Schwarzer. Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Cologne, ISBN 978-3462042634 .
  • 2011: The Freedom that I Mean ... or The Heart - or Wurst - of the Matter. In: Caroline Y. Robertson-von Trotha (Ed.): Europe: Insights from the Outside (= Kulturwissenschaft interdisciplinary / Interdisciplinary Studies on Culture and Society, Vol. 5). Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden, ISBN 978-3-8329-5583-0 .
  • 2010: On Freedom in Islam (= Vontobel series of publications. No. 1950). Zurich.
  • 2007: Turkish career. Alone among men. In Anatolia. In: Ulrike Ackermann (ed.): What freedom. A plea for an open society. Matthes & Seitz, Berlin, ISBN 978-3-88221-885-5 .
  • 2007: The Stereotypes of Buruma-san . In: Thierry Chervel, Anja Seeliger (Hrsg.): Islam in Europa. An international debate . Suhrkamp, ​​Frankfurt am Main, ISBN 978-3-518-12531-1 , pp. 110–116 (edition suhrkamp 2531, documentation of a debate that was previously conducted in the same year on the Perlentaucher and Signandsight internet platforms )

items

Filmography

  • 2008: Wrong Tolerance? - Imperious Islam, soft west. SF 1 , “Sternstunde Philosophie”: TV discussion with Necla Kelek, running time: 1 hour, first broadcast: April 8, 2008
  • 2006: Islam - between fundamentalism and reform. SWR , “Literature in the Foyer” by Thea Dorn , TV discussion with Necla Kelek, Nahed Selim and Ralph Ghadban , 58 min, first broadcast: April 7, 2006
  • 2005: Veiled Oppression? The women and Islam. SWR , TV discussion with Necla Kelek and Seyran Ateş , 44 min, first broadcast: March 8, 2005

literature

  • Sanna Plieschnegger: Criticism of Islam from within our own ranks. Hamed Abdel-Samad and Necla Kelek in comparison . Tectum Wissenschaftsverlag, Marburg 2013, ISBN 978-3-8288-3212-1 (the book is based on the diploma thesis in the subject of religious studies, University of Vienna 2012, full text for download , University Library Vienna)

See also

Web links

Commons : Necla Kelek  - collection of images, videos and audio files
Wikiquote: Necla Kelek  - Quotes

Individual evidence

  1. ↑ See on the person: Necla Kelek . The Rhine Palatinate , November 12, 2016
  2. ↑ Sanna Plieschnegger: Islam criticism from his own ranks , s. Literature p. 33
  3. ↑ See details on this in Necla Kelek: The Foreign Bride , see publications / books, pp. 138–154
  4. ↑ a b Sanna Plieschnegger: Islam criticism from their own ranks , s. Literature p. 44
  5. ↑ As an example: Muslims are not asked critically! , EMMA, Feb. 24, 2015
  6. ↑ As an example: Guest commentary by Necla Kelek on the Greens: Party is a brake on progress , Allgemeine Zeitung, Mainz, date above (2018)
  7. ↑ As an example: Muslim women also have the right not to be abused. In: Neue Zürcher Zeitung , March 8, 2018
  8. ^ Profile and guest posts by Necla Kelek at the Axis of Good .
  9. ↑ As an example: We need a rebellion of reason , The Capital Letter, Nov. 25, 2018
  10. ↑ Committees. German National Foundation , accessed on December 17, 2017 .
  11. ↑ See website Hildegard von Bingen Prize / Board of Trustees
  12. ↑ See website of "TdF": YAKA-KOOP, Turkey - Protection against violence in the name of honor . For further voluntary activities as well as prizes and awards from Necla Kelek see her homepage / "read more >>"
  13. ↑ Necla Kelek on the Ahmadiyya: “Anything but cosmopolitan” , DLF, 23 Aug 2017
  14. ↑ Please be very unfriendly - Ahmadiyya community is suing Islam critic Necla Kelek , NZZ, Nov. 28, 2018
  15. ^ Court dismisses Ahmadiyya lawsuit against Islam critic Necla Kelek , NZZ, Feb. 25, 2019
  16. ↑ Necla Kelek: The Strange Bride - reading sample. (PDF) Retrieved on August 9, 2018 (German).
  17. ↑ Patrick Bahners : The alarmists. The German fear of Islam. dtv, Munich 2012, ISBN 978-3-423-34721-1 , p. 148.
  18. ↑ Alexandra Senfft: Settlement with Islam, Necla Keleks outcry: Muslim women in Germany . In: FAZ , May 31, 2005
  19. ↑ Geschwister-Scholl-Prize to a writer critical of Turkey . In: Münchner Merkur , September 29, 2005
  20. ↑ Patrick Bahners: Die Panikmacher, S. 152/153, S. 155
  21. ^ Review notes at Perlentaucher
  22. ↑ Peter Voss asks Necla Kelek - Is Thilo Sarrazin right? 3sat , October 18, 2010, 10:25 p.m., part 1/3 , part 2/3 , part 3/3 on YouTube , part 1 from minute 0.
  23. ↑ The Passover Test . In: taz , January 16, 2006, a plea by Kelek for the controversial “discussion guide” of the Baden-Württemberg Ministry of the Interior for those seeking naturalization
  24. ↑ Necla Kelek: Your tolerance puts us in danger . In: Die Welt , February 26, 2005, "Example of forced marriage : Why red-green" Islamists "only worsen the situation of Muslim women."
  25. ^ Living situation, safety and health of women in Germany. (PDF; 8.3 MB) In: Federal Ministry for Family, Seniors, Women and Youth . 2004, p. 130f , accessed on October 25, 2019 (the study provides indications that around 10% of Turkish migrant women live in involuntary marriages, but warns against generalizing the result due to the small number of cases).
  26. ↑ Necla Kelek: The minaret is a symbol of power. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , June 5, 2007.
  27. ↑ Jörg Metes : Lamya Kaddor stalking Necla Kelek: The principle of perceived truth , ruhrbarone.de, December 17, 2017
  28. ↑ Till-Reimer Stoldt: Frei-brave-Muslim. In: The world . November 14, 2010, archived from the original on May 5, 2018 ; accessed on May 24, 2019 .
  29. ↑ Jürgen Kaube : Islam quote in court: Does Lamya Kaddor know better what Necla Kelek meant? In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung . January 20, 2019, accessed May 22, 2019 .
  30. ↑ Cf. Thierry Chervel : Stakkato der Infamy. Perlentaucher , December 18, 2017, https://www.perlentaucher.de/essay/wie-lamya-kaddor-und-andere-ueber-jahre-necla-kelek-mit-einem-verfaelschten-zitat-vervielten.html online.
  31. ↑ Lamya Kaddor: And yet she spoke of the sodomy of the Muslim man , T-Online, December 22, 2017.
  32. ↑ See Thierry Chervel on May 11, 2018 in " Perlentaucher "
  33. ^ Thierry Chervel: Berlin Regional Court judges Lamya Kaddor. In: Pearl Divers. December 13, 2018, accessed December 13, 2018 .
  34. ↑ Necla Kelek: A Religion of Arbitration. In: Neue Zürcher Zeitung , September 20, 2014, p. 24.
  35. ↑ The Ramadan demo is lying , Emma, ​​June 14, 2017
  36. ↑ New ambassadors for genital self-determination: Dr. Necla Kelek and Ralf König . ( hpd.de [accessed on November 11, 2017]).
  37. ↑ intaktiv ambassador | intaktiv eV Accessed on November 11, 2017 (German).
  38. ↑ Cem Özdemir founds the "Secular Islam Initiative". Der Spiegel , November 21, 2018, accessed on May 22, 2019 .
  39. ↑ Justice for the Muslims! In: Die Zeit , No. 6/2006. German integration policy is based on prejudices. So she has no future. Petition from 60 migration researchers.
  40. ^ Necla Kelek: Reply. In: Die Zeit , February 2, 2006.
  41. ↑ a b Necla Kelek: " Put it on the table!" In: the daily newspaper , February 3, 2006
  42. ↑ Necla Kelek: You allowed others to suffer! In: Die Zeit , February 9, 2006.
  43. ↑ Regina Mönch : False Freedom. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , February 3, 2006
  44. ↑ Regina Mönch : The true empiricism. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , February 8, 2006.
  45. ^ A b Mariam Lau : Dangerous do-gooders. In: Die Welt , February 8, 2006.
  46. ↑ Dilek Zaptcioglu : We and you. In: the daily newspaper , February 4, 2006.
  47. ↑ 13.02.2006: Role model for young migrant women - Rahel Volz / TDF defends the sociologist Necla Kelek. In: Frankfurter Rundschau via Frauenrechte.de , May 16, 2010.
  48. ↑ ( Page no longer available , search in web archives: Mark Terkessidis ) In: Frankfurter Rundschau , February 2006@1@ 2Template: Toter Link / fr-online.de
  49. ^ Joachim Güntner: Apparent giants as a migrant fright. In: Neue Zürcher Zeitung , February 11, 2006.
  50. ↑ Forced marriage swindlers. ( Memento from February 10, 2009 in the Internet Archive ) islamfaz.de, single day archive, February 9, 2006
  51. ^ The Kelek controversy: “More justice for Muslims?” ( Memento from July 15, 2010 in the Internet Archive ) Giordano Bruno Foundation
  52. ↑ Islamism: Open Answer . In: EMMA , March / April 2006, reprint of Schwarzer's article in the FAZ , Saturday, February 11, 2006, p. 40: “We owe everything to your courage. Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Necla Kelek and Seyran Ateş risk their lives. "
  53. ^ Citizens' service Hessenrecht: Decision of the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court, 16th civil senate of February 6, 2020, 16 U 50/19. In: Citizens Service Hessenrecht. Bürgerservice Hessenrecht, February 6, 2020, accessed on March 4, 2020 .
  54. ↑ Niklas Zimmermann: Judgment on critic of Islam: Necla Keleks Right to speak . In: FAZ.NET . ISSN  0174-4909 ( faz.net [accessed March 4, 2020]).
  55. ↑ Necla Kelek excellent. In: n-tv , November 15, 2005.
  56. ↑ https://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DocumentServlet?id=14654
  57. ↑ [1]
  58. ↑ freiheit.org ( Memento from September 9, 2011 in the Internet Archive )
  59. ↑ Peter Muehlbauer: Necla Kelek receives Freedom Prize from the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. In: Telepolis , November 6, 2010.
  60. ↑ Muslims must become free citizens. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , November 9, 2010.
  61. ↑ Lothar Schröder: The reform of Islam is coming. In: Rheinische Post (interview).
  62. ↑ Necla Kelek: Home, yes please! In: Die Zeit , March 9, 2006.
  63. ^ Rupert Neudeck : Necla Kelek: "The foreign bride". In: Deutschlandradio , March 6, 2005.
  64. ↑ Otto Schily : Alarming insight . In: Der Spiegel . No. 4 , 2005 ( online ).
  65. ↑ Ismail Küpeli: Sultry stories about "import brides": In the integration debate, women's rights are functionalized. In: kuepeli.blogsport.de ( PDF , 92 kB).
  66. ↑ Necla Kelek: About Freedom in Islam. ( Memento from September 4, 2010 in the Internet Archive ) In: frei-haben.ch , September 3, 2010.
  67. ↑ Necla Kelek: Alone among men. In Anatolia. In: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung , May 12, 2007.
  68. ↑ Wrong tolerance? - Imperious Islam, soft west - Necla Kelek accuses . ( Memento of April 10, 2008 in the Internet Archive ) Program reference to SF1, Necla Kelek suing , Videolink
  69. ↑ Veiled Oppression? The women and Islam . Program notice
personal data
SURNAME Kelek, Necla
BRIEF DESCRIPTION German sociologist and author
DATE OF BIRTH December 31, 1957
PLACE OF BIRTH Istanbul