User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1/Archive 1 and Ming dynasty: Difference between pages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
m stop sign
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{otheruses|Ming}}
{{message|User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1}}
{{Infobox Former Country
<!-- Template from Template:Welcomeg -->
|native_name = 大明
{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;" cellpadding="0"
|conventional_long_name = Great Ming
|style="border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;"|
|common_name = Ming Dynasty
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"
|
| <div style="margin:0; background-color:#CEF2E0; font-family:sans-serif; border:1px solid #084080; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}! [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome]] to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|your contributions]] to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out ''Getting Help'' below, ask me on {{#if: |[[User talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]|my talk page}}, or place '''{{tl|helpme}}''' on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your name]] on talk pages by clicking [[Image:Signature icon.png]] or using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -&nbsp;<font face="Verdana">[[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony™]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User_talk:Cobaltbluetony#top|talk]]</sub></font> 20:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
|continent = Asia
|}
|region = China
{| width="100%" style="background-color:#F5FFFA;"
|country = China
|style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
|era =
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
|status = Empire
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting started</div>
|status_text =
|-
|empire =
|style="color:#000"|
|government_type = Monarchy
* [[Wikipedia:Tutorial|A tutorial]] • [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|Our five pillars]] • [[Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User|Getting mentored]]
|
* How to: [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|edit a page]] • [[Wikipedia:Images|upload and use images]]
|year_start = 1368
|-
|year_end = 1644
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting help</div>
|-
|
|year_exile_start = 1644
| style="color:#000"|
|year_exile_end = 1662
* [[Wikipedia:FAQ|Frequently asked questions]] • [[Wikipedia:Tips|Tips]]
|
* [[Wikipedia:Questions|Where to ask questions or make comments]]
|event_start = Established in [[Nanjing]]
* [[Wikipedia:Requests for administrator attention|Request administrator attention]]
|date_start = [[January 23]] [[1368]]
|-
|event_end = Fall of [[Beijing]]
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Policies and guidelines</div>
|date_end = [[June 6]] [[1644]]
|-
|
| style="color:#000"|
|event1 =
* [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Neutral point of view]] • [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]]
|date_event1 =
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]] • [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|Reliable sources]] • [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|Citing sources]]
|event2 =
* [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]] • [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Biographies of living persons]]
|date_event2 =
<hr />
|event3 =
* [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] • [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|Three-revert rule]] • [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|Sock puppetry]]
|date_event3 =
* [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|Copyrights]] • [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|Policy for non-free content]] • [[Wikipedia:Image use policy|Image use policy]]
|event4 =
* [[Wikipedia:External links|External links]] • [[Wikipedia:Spam|Spam]] • [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|Vandalism]]
|date_event4 =
* [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Deletion policy]] • [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|Conflict of interest]] • [[Wikipedia:Notability|Notability]]
|-
|
|event_post = End of the Southern Ming
|}
|date_post = April, 1662
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
|p1 = Yuan Dynasty
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">The community</div>
|s1 = Shun Dynasty
|-
|s2 = Qing Dynasty
|style="color:#000"|
|flag_s2 = China Qing Dynasty Flag 1889.svg
* [[Wikipedia:Consensus|Build consensus]] • [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|Resolve disputes]]
|
* [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|Assume good faith]] • [[Wikipedia:Civility|Civility]] • [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|Etiquette]]
|image_flag =
* [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|No personal attacks]] • [[Wikipedia:No legal threats|No legal threats]]
|flag =
<hr />
|flag_type =
* [[Wikipedia:Community Portal|Community Portal]] • [[Wikipedia:Village pump|Village pump]]
|
* [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Signpost]] • [[Wikipedia:IRC channels|IRC channels]] • [[Wikipedia:Mailing lists|Mailing lists]]
|image_coat =
|-
|symbol =
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Writing articles</div>
|symbol_type =
|-
|
|style="color:#000"|
|
* [[Wikipedia:Be bold|Be bold in editing]] • [[Wikipedia:Article development|Develop an article]]
|image_map = Ming-Empire2.jpg
* [[Wikipedia:The perfect article|The perfect article]] • [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of style]]
|image_map_caption = Ming China under the [[Yongle Emperor]]
* [[Wikipedia:Stub|Stubs]] • [[Wikipedia:Categorization|Categories]] • [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation|Disambiguation]]
|
* [[Wikipedia:Pages needing attention|Pages needing attention]] • [[Wikipedia:Peer review|Peer review]]
|capital = [[Nanjing]]<br><small>(1368-1421)</small><br>[[Beijing]]<br><small>(1421-1644)
|-
<!-- |These were the capitals exile of Southern Ming: capital_exile = [[Nanjing]] <small>(1644)</small>, [[Fuzhou]] <small>(1645-1646)</small>, [[Guangzhou]] <small>(1646-1647),</small> [[Zhaoqing]] <small>(1446-1652)</small>etc. -->
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Miscellaneous</div>
|latd=39|latm=54|latNS=N|longd=116|longm=23|longEW=E
|-
|
|style="color:#000"|
|common_languages = [[Chinese language|Chinese]]
* [[Wikipedia:Username policy|User name]] • [[Wikipedia:User page|User pages]] • [[Wikipedia:Talk page|Talk pages]]
|religion = [[Buddhism]], [[Taoism]], [[Confucianism]], [[Chinese folk religion]]
* Clean up: [[Wikipedia:Cleanup|General]] - [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam|Spam]] - [[Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism|Vandalism]]
|currency = [[Chinese cash]], [[Chinese coin]], [[Banknote|Paper currency]] (later abolished)
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|Join a WikiProject]] • [[Wikipedia:Translation|Translation]]
|
* [[Wikipedia:Template messages|Useful templates]] • [[Wikipedia:Tools|Tools]] • [[Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts|User scripts]]
|leader1 = [[Hongwu Emperor]]
|-
|leader2 = [[Chongzhen Emperor]]
|}
|year_leader1 = 1368-1398
|}
|year_leader2 = 1627-1644
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg-->
|title_leader = [[List of Emperors of the Ming Dynasty|Emperor]]
|deputy1 = [[Liu Ji]]
|deputy2 = [[Yan Song (Ming Dynasty)|Yan Song]]
|deputy3 = [[Tan Lun]]
|deputy4 = [[Zhang Juzheng]]
|deputy5 = [[Zhu Guozhen (Ming Dynasty)|Zhu Guozhen]]
|year_deputy1 = 1368&ndash;1398
|year_deputy2 = &ndash;
|year_deputy3 =
|year_deputy4 = &ndash;
|year_deputy5 =
|title_deputy = [[Chancellor of China|Chancellor]]
|
|stat_year1 = 1393
|stat_area1 =
|stat_pop1 = 72,700,000
|stat_year2 = 1400
|stat_area2 =
|stat_pop2 = 65,000,000¹
|stat_year3 = 1600
|stat_area3 =
|stat_pop3 = 150,000,000¹
|stat_year4 = 1644
|stat_area4 =
|stat_pop4 = 100,000,000
|stat_year5 =
|stat_area5 =
|stat_pop5 =
|footnotes = Remnants of the Ming Dynasty ruled southern China until 1662, a dynastic period which is known as the Southern Ming.<br />¹ The numbers are based on estimates made by C.J. Peers in ''Late Imperial Chinese Armies: 1520-1840''
}}
{{History of China}}
The '''Ming Dynasty''' ({{zh-cp|c=明朝|p=Míng Cháo}}), or '''Empire of the Great Ming''' ({{zh-tsp|t=大明國|s=大明国|p=Dà Míng Guó}}), was the ruling [[Dynasties in Chinese history|dynasty]] of [[China]] from 1368 to 1644, following the collapse of the [[Mongol]]-led [[Yuan Dynasty]]. The Ming was the last dynasty in China ruled by ethnic [[Han Chinese|Han]]s (the main Chinese ethnic group), before falling to the rebellion led in part by [[Li Zicheng]] (李自成) and soon after replaced by the [[Manchu]]-led [[Qing Dynasty]]. Although the Ming capital [[Beijing]] fell in 1644, remnants of the Ming throne and power (collectively called the '''Southern Ming''') survived until 1662.


Ming rule saw the construction of a vast [[Naval history of China|navy]] and a [[standing army]] of one million troops.<ref name="ebrey east asia 271">Ebrey (2006), 271.</ref> Although private maritime trade and official tribute missions from China had taken place in previous dynasties, the tributary fleet under the [[Muslim]] [[eunuch]] admiral [[Zheng He]] in the 15th century surpassed all others in sheer size. There were enormous projects of construction, including the restoration of the [[Grand Canal of China|Grand Canal]] and the [[Great Wall of China|Great Wall]] and the establishment of the [[Forbidden City]] in Beijing during the first quarter of the 15th century. Estimates for the population in the late Ming era vary from 160 to 200 million.<ref>For the lower population estimate, see {{Harvcol|Fairbank|Goldman|2006|pp=128}}, for the higher estimate see {{Harvcol|Ebrey|1999|pp=197}}.</ref> The [[University of Calgary]] states that "the Ming created one of the greatest eras of orderly government and social stability in human history."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/eurvoya/ming.html|title=The European Voyages of Exploration & The Ming Dynasty's Maritime History|publisher=The [[University of Calgary]]|accessdate=2008-06-27}}</ref>
== Redirect Pages ==


[[Hongwu Emperor|Emperor Hongwu]] (r. 1368&ndash;1398) attempted to create a society of self-sufficient rural communities in a rigid, immobile system that would have no need to engage with the commercial life and trade of urban centers. His rebuilding of China's agricultural base and strengthening of communication routes through the militarized [[courier]] system had the unintended effect of creating a vast agricultural surplus that could be sold at burgeoning markets located along courier routes. Rural culture and commerce became influenced by urban trends. The upper echelons of society embodied in the [[Gentry (China)|scholarly gentry class]] were also affected by this new consumption-based culture. In a departure from tradition, merchant families began to produce examination candidates to become [[Scholar-bureaucrats|scholar-officials]] and adopted cultural traits and practices typical of the gentry class. Parallel to this trend involving social class and commercial consumption were changes in social and political philosophy, bureaucracy and governmental institution, and even arts and literature.
Please do not create redirect pages that redirect to nonexistent pages. They will be deleted. Addtitionally if these are test pages, please do not create test pages as they will also be deleted. [[User:Xp54321|<font color="191970">'''Xp54321''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Xp54321|<font color="FF8C00">'''''Hello!'''''</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Xp54321|<font color="FF8C00">'''''Contribs'''''</font>]])</sup> 22:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


By the 16th century the Ming economy was stimulated by maritime trade with the [[Portuguese Empire|Portuguese]], [[Spanish Empire|Spanish]], and [[Dutch Republic|Dutch]]. China became involved in a new global trade of goods, plants, animals, and food crops known as the [[Columbian Exchange]]. Trade with [[Early Modern Europe|European powers]] and the [[Japan]]ese brought in massive amounts of [[silver]], which then replaced copper and paper [[banknote]]s as the common [[medium of exchange]] in China. During the last decades of the Ming the flow of silver into China was greatly diminished, thereby undermining state revenues and indeed the entire Ming economy. This damage to the economy was compounded by the effects on agriculture of the incipient [[Little Ice Age]], natural calamities, crop failure, and sudden epidemics. The ensuing breakdown of authority and people's livelihoods allowed rebel leaders such as Li Zicheng to challenge Ming authority.
== [[Wikipedia: WikiProject Red Link Recovery]] ==


howdy are how you guys doing?
There is no need to make redirects for the red links that only one or two articles link to. In those cases you need to go into the article and edit the red links to the correct links.
==History==
{{Main|History of the Ming Dynasty}}
{{See|List of Emperors of the Ming Dynasty}}
===Founding===
====Revolt and rebel rivalry====
The [[Mongol Empire|Mongol]]-led [[Yuan Dynasty]] (1271&ndash;1368) ruled before the establishment of the Ming Dynasty. Alongside institutionalized ethnic discrimination against [[Han Chinese]] that stirred resentment and rebellion, other explanations for the Yuan's demise included overtaxing areas hard-hit by crop failure, [[inflation]], and massive flooding of the [[Yellow River]] as a result of the abandonment of irrigation projects.<ref name="gascoigne 150"/> Consequently, agriculture and the economy were in shambles and rebellion broke out among the hundreds of thousands of peasants called upon to work on repairing the dykes of the Yellow River.<ref name="gascoigne 150">Gascoigne, 150.</ref>


[[Image:Chinese Cannon.JPG|thumb|left|170px|A [[cannon]] from the ''[[Huolongjing]]'', compiled by [[Jiao Yu]] and [[Liu Ji]] before the latter's death in 1375.]]
From the top of the page: "Pick any entry in the list below. If the red link noted is incorrect fix it, for example by adding a missing character. Even if the resulting link is still red, fixing the link may encourage someone to write the missing article."
A number of Han Chinese groups revolted, including the [[Red Turban Rebellion|Red Turbans]] (红巾军) in 1351. The Red Turbans were affiliated with the [[White Lotus]], a [[Chinese Buddhism|Buddhist]] secret society. Zhu Yuanzhang was a penniless peasant and Buddhist monk who joined the Red Turbans in 1352, but soon gained a reputation after marrying the foster daughter of a rebel commander.<ref>Ebrey (1999), 190&ndash;191.</ref> In 1356 Zhu's rebel force captured the city of [[Nanjing]],<ref name="gascoigne 151">Gascoigne 151.</ref> which he would later establish as the capital of the Ming Dynasty.


Zhu Yuanzhang (朱元璋) cemented his power in the south by eliminating his arch rival and rebel leader [[Chen Youliang]] (陈友谅) in the [[Battle of Lake Poyang]] (鄱阳湖水战) in 1363. After the dynastic head of the Red Turbans suspiciously died in 1367 while hosted as a guest of Zhu, the latter made his imperial ambitions known by sending an army toward the Yuan capital in 1368.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 191">Ebrey (1999), 191.</ref> The last Yuan emperor fled north to [[Shangdu]] and Zhu declared the founding of the Ming Dynasty after razing the Yuan palaces of [[Khanbaliq]] (Beijing) to the ground.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 191"/>
For the Unlikely brackets category most of the red links just need a "(" or a ")" to direct them to the right page. [[User:Aspects|Aspects]] ([[User talk:Aspects|talk]]) 22:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


Instead of the traditional way of naming a dynasty after the first ruler's home district, Zhu's choice of 'Ming' or 'Brilliant' for his dynasty followed a Mongol precedent of an uplifting title.<ref name="gascoigne 151"/> Zhu Yuanzhang also took [[Hongwu Emperor|Hongwu]], or 'Vastly Martial' as his reign title. Although the White Lotus had fomented his rise to power, Hongwu later denied that he had ever been a member of their organization and suppressed the religious movement after he became emperor.<ref name="gascoigne 151"/><ref name="wakeman">Wakeman, 207.</ref>
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from {{#if:Black hole|[[:Black hole]]|Wikipedia}}. When removing text, please specify a reason in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk page]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the [[Help:Page history|page history]]. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_hole&diff=next&oldid=227989103 link]</span>. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. <!-- 65--> [[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#FFF090;color:#00C000">'''Sp<font style="background:#FFF0A0;color:#80C000">in<font style="color:#C08000">ni</font></font><font style="color:#C00000">ng</font></font><font style="color:#2820F0">Spark'''</font>]] 16:45, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


====Reign of the Hongwu Emperor====
==Proposed deletion of [[Properties of black holes]]==
[[Image:Hongwu1.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Portrait of the [[Hongwu Emperor]] (r. 1368 - 1398)]]
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]]
Hongwu immediately set to rebuilding state infrastructure. He built a 48 km (30 mile) long [[City Wall of Nanjing|wall around Nanjing]], as well as new palaces and government halls.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 191"/> The ''[[History of Ming|Mingshi]]'' 明史 states that as early as 1364 Zhu Yuanzhang had begun drafting a new [[Confucianism|Confucian]] law code known as the ''Daming Lu'', which was completed by 1397 and repeated certain clauses found in the old [[Tang Code]] of 653.<ref name="andrew rapp 25">Andrew & Rapp, 25.</ref> Hongwu organized a military system known as the ''weisuo'', which was similar to the [[Fubing system|''fubing'' system]] of the [[Tang Dynasty]] (618&ndash;907). The goal was to have soldiers become self-reliant farmers in order to sustain themselves while not fighting or training.<ref name="fairbank 129">Fairbank, 129.</ref> The system of the self-sufficient agricultural soldier, however, was largely a farce; infrequent rations and awards were not enough to sustain the troops, and many deserted their ranks if they weren't located in the heavily-supplied frontier.<ref name="fairbank 134"/>
A [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] template has been added to the article [[Properties of black holes]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{[[Template:dated prod|dated prod]]}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Properties of black holes|its talk page]].


Although a Confucian, Hongwu had a deep distrust for the [[Scholar-bureaucrats|scholar-officials]] of the [[Gentry (China)|gentry class]] and was not afraid to have them beaten in court for offenses.<ref name="ebrey 191 193">Ebrey (1999), 191&ndash;192.</ref> He halted the [[Imperial examinations|civil service examinations]] in 1373 after complaining that the 120 scholar-officials who obtained a ''jinshi'' degree were incompetent ministers.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 192">Ebrey (1999), 192.</ref><ref name="hucker 13">Hucker, 13.</ref> After the examinations were reinstated in 1384,<ref name="hucker 13"/> he had the chief examiner executed after it was discovered that he allowed only candidates from the south to be granted ''jinshi'' degrees.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 192"/>
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.<!-- {{PRODWarning|Properties of black holes}} --> [[User:Spinningspark|<font style="background:#FFF090;color:#00C000">'''Sp<font style="background:#FFF0A0;color:#80C000">in<font style="color:#C08000">ni</font></font><font style="color:#C00000">ng</font></font><font style="color:#2820F0">Spark'''</font>]] 17:14, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


In 1380 Hongwu had the Chancellor Hu Weiyong (左丞相 胡惟庸) executed upon suspicion of a conspiracy plot to overthrow him; after that Hongwu abolished the [[Chancellor of China|Chinese Chancellery]] and assumed this role as chief executive and emperor.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 192 193">Ebrey (1999), 192&ndash;193.</ref><ref>Fairbank, 130.</ref> With a growing suspicion of his ministers and subjects, Hongwu established the [[Jinyi Wei]] (锦衣卫), a network of [[secret police]] drawn from his own palace guard. They were partly responsible for the loss of 100,000 lives in several purges over three decades of his rule.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 192 193"/><ref>Fairbank, 129&ndash;130.</ref>
==Proposed deletion of [[2021 in sports]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]]
A [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] template has been added to the article [[2021 in sports]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:2021 in sports|its talk page]].


====South-Western Frontier====
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> --[[User:Alinnisawest|Alinnisawest]]([[User talk:Alinnisawest|talk]]) 21:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Dali-puerta-sur-c01.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The old south gate of [[Dali, Yunnan]], which was established as a Chinese-style city in 1382 shortly after the Ming conquest of the region.]]


In 1381, the Ming Dynasty annexed the areas of the southwest that had once been part of the [[Kingdom of Dali]]. By the end of the 14th century, some 200,000 military colonists settled some 2,000,000 ''mu'' (350,000 acres) of land in what is now [[Yunnan]] and [[Guizhou]].<ref name="ebrey cambridge 195">Ebrey (1999), 195.</ref> Roughly half a million more Chinese settlers came in later periods; these migrations caused a major shift in the ethnic make-up of the region, since more than half of the roughly 3,000,000 inhabitants at the beginning of the Ming Dynasty were non-Han peoples.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 195"/> In this region, the Ming government adopted a policy of dual administration. Areas with majority ethnic Chinese were governed according to Ming laws and policies; areas where native tribal groups dominated had their own set of laws while [[tusi|tribal chiefs]] promised to maintain order and send tribute to the Ming court in return for needed goods.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 195"/> From 1464 to 1466 the [[Miao people|Miao]] and [[Yao people]] revolted against what they saw as oppressive government rule; in response, the Ming government sent an army of 30,000 troops (including 1,000 Mongols) to join the 160,000 local troops of [[Guangxi]] and crushed the rebellion.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 197">Ebrey (1999), 197.</ref> After the scholar and philosopher [[Wang Yangming]] (1472&ndash;1529) suppressed another rebellion in the region, he advocated joint administration of Chinese and local ethnic groups in order to bring about [[Sinicization|sinification]] in the local peoples' culture.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 197"/>
==Speedy deletion of [[:2021 in sports]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:2021 in sports]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A3|section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see [[Wikipedia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] subjects and should provide references to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] their content.


====Relations with Tibet====
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:2021 in sports|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:2021 in sports|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> --[[User:cocomonkilla|Cocomonkilla]] <sup>([[User_talk:Cocomonkilla|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Cocomonkilla|contrib]])</sup> 21:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
{{main|Tibet during the Ming Dynasty}}
[[Image:17th century Central Tibeten thanka of Guhyasamaja Akshobhyavajra, Rubin Museum of Art.jpg|thumb|right|200px|A 17th century Tibetan [[thangka]] of Guhyasamaja Akshobhyavajra; the Ming Dynasty court gathered various tribute items which were native products of Tibet (such as thangkas),<ref name="information office of the state council 73">Information Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, ''Testimony of History'', 73. </ref> and in return granted Tibetan tribute-bearers with gifts.<ref>Wang Jiawei & Nyima Gyaincain, ''The Historical Status of China's Tibet'' (China Intercontinental Press, 1997), 39&ndash;41.</ref>]]


Scholarship outside China generally regards Tibet as having been independent during the Ming Dynasty, whereas historians in China today take an opposing point of view. The ''[[History of Ming|Mingshi]]''— the official history of the Ming Dynasty compiled later by the [[Qing Dynasty]] in 1739—states that the Ming established itinerant commanderies overseeing Tibetan administration while also renewing titles of ex-Yuan Dynasty officials from [[Tibet]] and conferring new princely titles on leaders of [[Tibetan Buddhism|Tibet's Buddhist sects]].<ref name="mingshi">''[[Mingshi]]''-Geography I «明史•地理一»: 東起朝鮮,西據吐番,南包安南,北距大磧。; Geography III «明史•地理三»: 七年七月置西安行都衛於此,領河州、朵甘、烏斯藏、三衛。; Western territory III «明史•列傳第二百十七西域三»</ref> However, Turrell V. Wylie states that [[censorship]] in the ''Mingshi'' in favor of bolstering the Ming emperor's prestige and reputation at all costs obfuscates the nuanced history of Sino-Tibetan relations during the Ming era.<ref name="wylie 470"/> Modern scholars still debate on whether or not the Ming Dynasty really had [[sovereignty]] over Tibet at all, as some believe it was a relationship of loose [[suzerainty]] which was largely cut off when the [[Jiajing Emperor]] (r. 1521&ndash;1567) persecuted Buddhism in favor of [[Daoism]] at court.<ref name="wang nyima 1 40">Wang & Nyima, 1&ndash;40.</ref><ref name="laird 106 107">Laird, 106&ndash;107.</ref><ref name="wylie 470">Wylie, 470.</ref> Helmut Hoffman states that the Ming upheld the facade of rule over Tibet through periodic missions of "tribute emissaries" to the Ming court and by granting nominal titles to ruling lamas, but did not actually interfere in Tibetan governance.<ref name="Hoffman 65">Hoffman, 65.</ref> Wang Jiawei and Nyima Gyaincain disagree, stating that Ming China had sovereignty over Tibetans who did not inherit Ming titles, but were forced to travel to Beijing to renew them.<ref name="wang nyima 37">Wang & Nyima, 37.</ref> Melvyn C. Goldstein writes that the Ming had no real administrative authority over Tibet since the various titles given to Tibetan leaders already in power did not confer authority as earlier Mongol Yuan titles had; according to him, "the Ming emperors merely recognized political reality."<ref name="goldstein 4 5">Goldstein, 4&ndash;5.</ref> Some scholars argue that the significant religious nature of the relationship of the Ming court with Tibetan lamas is underrepresented in modern scholarship.<ref name="norbu 52">Norbu, 52.</ref><ref name="kolmas 32">Kolmas, 32.</ref> Others underscore the commercial aspect of the relationship, noting the Ming Dynasty's insufficient amount of horses and the need to maintain the [[Tibet during the Ming Dynasty#Tribute and exchanging tea for horses|tea-horse trade]] with Tibet.<ref name="wang nyima 39">Wang & Nyima, 39&ndash;40.</ref><ref name="sperling 474 475">Sperling, 474&ndash;475, 478.</ref><ref name="perdue 273">Perdue, 273.</ref><ref name="kolmas 28 29">Kolmas, 28&ndash;29.</ref><ref name="laird 131">Laird, 131</ref> Scholars also debate on how much power and influence—if any—the Ming Dynasty court had over the ''de facto'' successive ruling families of Tibet, the Phagmodru (1354&ndash;1436), Rinbung (1436&ndash;1565), and Tsangpa (1565&ndash;1642).<ref name="kolmas 29">Kolmas, 29.</ref><ref name="chan 262">Chan, 262.</ref><ref name="norbu 58">Norbu, 58.</ref><ref name="laird 137"/><ref name="wang nyima 42">Wang & Nyima, 42.</ref><ref name="dreyfus 504">Dreyfus, 504.</ref>
==Speedy deletion of [[:September 2021]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:September 2021]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A3|section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see [[Wikipedia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] subjects and should provide references to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] their content.


The Ming initiated sporadic armed intervention in Tibet during the 14th century, while at times the Tibetans also used successful armed resistance against Ming forays.<ref name="langlois">Langlois, 139 & 161.</ref><ref name="geiss 417 418">Geiss, 417&ndash;418.</ref> Patricia Ebrey, Thomas Laird, Wang Jiawei, and Nyima Gyaincain all point out that the Ming Dynasty did not garrison permanent troops in Tibet,<ref name="ebrey 1999 227">Ebrey (1999), 227.</ref><ref name="laird 137">Laird, 137.</ref><ref name="wang nyima 38">Wang & Nyima, 38.</ref> unlike the former Mongol Yuan Dynasty.<ref name="laird 137"/> The [[Wanli Emperor]] (r. 1572–1620) made attempts to reestablish Sino-Tibetan relations in the wake of a [[History of Tibet#The origin of the title of 'Dalai Lama'|Mongol-Tibetan alliance]] initiated in 1578, the latter of which affected the foreign policy of the subsequent Manchu [[Qing Dynasty]] (1644–1912) of China in their support for the [[Dalai Lama]] of the [[Gelug|Yellow Hat]] sect. <ref name="wylie 470"/><ref name="kolmas 31">Kolmas, 30&ndash;31.</ref><ref name="goldstein 8">Goldstein, 8.</ref><ref name="laird 143 144">Laird, 143&ndash;144.</ref><ref name="The Ming Biographical History Project of the Association for Asian Studies 23">The Ming Biographical History Project of the Association for Asian Studies, ''Dictionary of Ming Biography'', 23.</ref> By the late 16th century, the Mongols proved to be successful armed protectors of the Yellow Hat Dalai Lama after their increasing presence in the [[Amdo]] region, culminating in [[Güshi Khan]]'s (1582&ndash;1655) [[Tibet during the Ming Dynasty#Civil war and Güshi Khan|conquest of Tibet in 1642]].<ref name="wylie 470"/><ref name="kolmas 34 35">Kolmas, 34&ndash;35.</ref><ref name="goldstein 6 8">Goldstein, 6&ndash;9.</ref><ref name="laird 152">Laird, 152.</ref>
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:September 2021|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:September 2021|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> --[[User:Alinnisawest|Alinnisawest]]([[User talk:Alinnisawest|talk]]) 21:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


===Reversal of Hongwu's policies===
== August 2008 ==
====Imposing standards and relocations====
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia{{#if:Joe jonas|, as you did to [[:Joe jonas]],}} without giving a valid reason for the removal in the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. Please make use of the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ''I changed the content for a [[WP:REDIRECT|redirection]], as the page was about a subject already on Wikipedia. Could you explain your reasoning for changing the back to a previous revision and then adding a deletion tag?'' [[User:Booglamay|<b style="color:#bdd8e7">B</b><b style="color:#9bc6de">o</b><b style="color:#74aecf">o</b><b style="color:#4d97c1">g</b><b style="color:#3485b3">l</b><b style="color:#1f6e9c">a</b><b style="color:#0b5a88">m</b><b style="color:#013d5f">a</b><b style="color:#003d60">y</b>]] (<font style="color:#6699cc">[[User talk:Booglamay|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Booglamay|contributions]]</font>) - 23:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Nj02.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The [[City Wall of Nanjing]]]]
According to historian Timothy Brook, the Hongwu Emperor attempted to immobilize society by creating rigid, state-regulated boundaries between villages and larger townships, discouraging trade and travel in society not permitted by the government.<ref name="brook 19">Brook, 19.</ref> Hongwu attempted to instill austere values by imposing uniform dress codes, standard methods of speech, and standard style of writing [[Chinese literature#Classical prose|classical prose]] that did not flaunt the skills of the highly educated.<ref name="brook 30 32">Brook, 30&ndash;32.</ref> His suspicion for the educated elite matched his disdain for the commercial elites, imposing inordinately high taxes upon the hotbed of powerful merchant families in the region of [[Suzhou]] in [[Jiangsu]].<ref name="ebrey cambridge 192"/> He also forcibly moved thousands of wealthy families from the southeast and resettled them around Nanjing in the [[Jiangnan]] region, forbidding them to move once they were settled.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 192"/><ref name="brook 28 29">Brook, 28&ndash;29.</ref> To keep track of the merchants' activities, Hongwu forced them to register all of their goods once a month.<ref name="brook 65 67">Brook, 65&ndash;67.</ref> One of his main goals as ruler was to permanently curb the influence of merchants and landlords, yet several of his policies would eventually encourage them to amass more wealth.


Hongwu's oppressive system of massive relocation and the desire to escape his harsh taxes encouraged many to become [[itinerant]] retailers, peddlers, or migrant workers finding tenant landowners who would rent them space to farm and labor on.<ref>Brook, 27&ndash;28, 94&ndash;95.</ref> By the mid Ming era, emperors had abandoned Hongwu's relocation scheme and instead trusted local officials to document migrant workers in order to bring in more revenue.<ref name = "brook 97"/> An elite of wealthy landlords and merchants reigning over land tenants, wage laborers, domestic servants, and migrant workers was hardly the vision of Hongwu's: strict adherence to the hierarchic status system of the [[four occupations]].<ref>Brook, 85, 146, 154.</ref>
==Speedy deletion of [[:Document conversion]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:Document conversion]], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#G11|section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read [[Wikipedia:Spam|the guidelines on spam]] as well as the [[Wikipedia:Business' FAQ]] for more information.


====Self-sufficient agriculture, surplus, and urban trends====
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Document conversion|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Document conversion|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Minkythecat|Minkythecat]] ([[User talk:Minkythecat|talk]]) 10:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Porcelaine chinoise Guimet 271108.jpg|thumb|right|200px|A [[Chinese ceramics|porcelain]] vase from the [[Jiajing Emperor|Jiajing reign period]] (1521&ndash;1567); Chinese culture became a consumptionary-based culture by the late Ming. Social elites were expected to know the difference between shoddy crafts and fine wares, and even which type of plants were to be appreciated as rare and exotic enough for [[Chinese garden|one's garden]].<ref>Brook, 136&ndash;137.</ref>]]
Hongwu revived the agricultural sector to create self-sufficient communities that would not rely on commerce, which he assumed would remain only in urban areas.<ref name="brook 69">Brook, 69.</ref> Yet the surplus created from this revival encouraged rural farmers to make profits by first selling their goods at thoroughfares; by the mid Ming era they began selling their goods in regional urban markets.<ref>Brook, 65&ndash;66, 112&ndash;113.</ref> As the countryside and urban areas became more connected through commerce, households in rural areas began taking on traditionally urban specializations, such as production of silk and cotton textiles.<ref>Brook, 113&ndash;117.</ref> By the late Ming there was a growing concern amongst conservative Confucians that the metaphorical delicate fabric holding together the communal social order was being undermined by country rustics accepting every manner of urban life and decadence.<ref name="brook 124 125">Brook, 124&ndash;125.</ref>


The rural farmer was not the only social group affected by growing commercialization of Chinese society; it also heavily influenced the landholding gentry that traditionally produced scholar-officials for [[civil service]]. The scholar-officials were traditionally held as frugal individuals who deterred themselves from arrogance in the wealth garnered from a prestigious career; they were known even to walk from their country homes into the city where they were employed.<ref name="brook 144 145">Brook, 144&ndash;145.</ref> By the time of the [[Zhengde Emperor]] (1505&ndash;1521), officials chose to be hauled around in luxurious [[Litter (vehicle)|sedan chairs]] and began purchasing lavish homes in affluent urban neighborhoods instead of living in the countryside.<ref name="brook 144 145"/> By the late Ming era, gaining wealth became the prime indicator of social prestige, even more so than gaining a scholarly degree.<ref>Brook, 128, 144.</ref>
==[[:September 2021]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|left|48px|]]<!-- use [[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]] for YELLOW flag -->
A tag has been placed on [[:September 2021]], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the [[WP:CSD#Articles|criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see [[Wikipedia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] subjects and should provide references to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] their content.


====Fusion of the merchant and gentry classes====
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]] wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template '''<code>{{tl|hangon}}</code>''' to the page and state your intention on the article's [[Help:Talk page|talk page]]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Empty-warn --> [[User:Apparition11|Apparition11]] ([[User talk:Apparition11|talk]]) 14:10, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:旋转 DSCN1782.JPG|thumb|right|200px|[[Pagoda of Cishou Temple|Cishou Temple Pagoda]], built in 1576; the Chinese believed that building pagodas on certain sites according to [[Feng shui|geomantic principles]] brought about auspicious events;<ref name="brook 7">Brook, 7.</ref> merchant-funding for such projects was needed by the late Ming period.]]
In the first half of the Ming era, scholar-officials would rarely mention the contribution of merchants in society while writing their local [[gazetteer]];<ref name="brook 73">Brook, 73.</ref> officials were certainly capable of funding their own public works projects, a symbol of their virtuous political leadership.<ref>Brook, 6&ndash;7, 90&ndash;91.</ref> However, by the second half of the Ming era it became common for officials to solicit money from merchants in order to fund their various projects, such as building bridges or establishing new schools of Confucian learning for the betterment of the gentry.<ref name="brook 90 93">Brook, 90&ndash;93.</ref> From that point on the gazetteers began mentioning merchants and often in high esteem, since the wealth produced by their economic activity produced resources for the state as well as increased production of books needed for the education of the gentry.<ref>Brook, 90&ndash;93, 129&ndash;130, 151.</ref> Merchants began taking on the highly-cultured, [[connoisseur]]'s attitude and cultivated traits of the gentry class, blurring the lines between merchant and gentry and paving the way for merchant families to produce scholar-officials.<ref>Brook, 128&ndash;129, 134&ndash;138.</ref> The roots of this social transformation and class indistinction [[Society of the Song Dynasty#Social class|could be found in the Song Dynasty]] (960&ndash;1279),<ref>Gernet, 60&ndash;61, 68&ndash;69.</ref> but it became much more pronounced in the Ming. Writings of family instructions for lineage groups in the late Ming period display the fact that one no longer inherited his position in the categorization of the four occupations (in descending order): [[Four occupations#The shi (士)|gentry]], [[Four occupations#The nong (农)|farmers]], [[Four occupations#The gong (工)|artisans]], and [[Four occupations#The shang (商)|merchants]].<ref name="brook 161">Brook, 161.</ref>


====Courier network and commercial growth====
:In regards to articles like these, they are not yet notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. If you can't put anything on the page, likely you shouldn't create it. Cheers. <font color="green">[[User:Lifebaka|''lifebaka'']]</font>[[User talk:Lifebaka|'''++''']] 14:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Hongwu believed that only government [[courier]]s and lowly retail merchants should have the right to travel far outside their home town.<ref name="brook 65 67"/> Despite his efforts to impose this view, his building of an efficient communication network for his military and official personnel strengthened and fomented the rise of a potential commercial network running parallel to the courier network.<ref>Brook, 10, 49&ndash;51, 56.</ref> The shipwrecked Korean [[Choe Bu]] (1454&ndash;1504) remarked in 1488 how the locals along the eastern coasts of China did not know the exact distances between certain places, which was virtually exclusive knowledge of the [[Three Departments and Six Ministries|Ministry of War]] and courier agents.<ref name="brook 40 43">Brook, 40&ndash;43.</ref> This was in stark contrast to the late Ming period, when merchants not only traveled further distances to convey their goods, but also bribed courier officials to use their routes and even had printed geographical guides of commercial routes that imitated the couriers' maps.<ref>Brook, 10, 118&ndash;119.</ref>


====Merchants, an open market, and silver====
== Speedy deletion tags ==
[[Image:MingLacquerTable1.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The only surviving piece of furniture from the "Orchard Factory" (the Imperial [[Lacquer]] Workshop) set up in [[Beijing]] in the early Ming Dynasty. Decorated in [[dragon]]s and [[Phoenix (mythology)|phoenixes]], it was made during the [[Xuande Emperor|Xuande]] era (1426&ndash;1435). The imperial workshops in the Ming era were overseen by a eunuch bureau.<ref name="hucker 25"/> ([[media:MingLacquerTable2.jpg|See closeup for detail]])]]
The scholar-officials' dependence upon the economic activities of the merchants became more than a trend when it was semi-institutionalized by the state in the mid Ming era. Qiu Jun (1420&ndash;1495), a scholar-official from [[Hainan]], argued that the state should only mitigate market affairs during times of pending crisis and that merchants were the best gauge in determining the strength of a nation's riches in resources.<ref name="brook 102">Brook, 102.</ref> The government followed this guideline by the mid Ming era when it allowed merchants to take over the state [[monopoly]] of salt production. This was a gradual process where the state supplied northern frontier armies with enough grain by granting merchants licenses to trade in salt in return for their shipping services.<ref name="brook 108">Brook, 108.</ref> The state realized that merchants could buy salt licenses with silver and in turn boost state revenues to the point where buying grain was not an issue.<ref name="brook 108"/> The governments of both Hongwu and [[Zhengtong]] (r. 1435&ndash;1449) attempted to cut the flow of silver into the economy in favor of [[Banknote|paper currency]], yet mining the precious metal simply became a lucrative illegal pursuit practiced by many.<ref>Brook, 68&ndash;69, 81&ndash;83.</ref> Hongwu was unaware of economic inflation even as he continued to hand out multitudes of banknotes as awards; by 1425, paper currency was worth only 0.025% to 0.014% its original value in the 14th century.<ref name="fairbank 134">Fairbank, 134.</ref> The value of standard copper coinage dropped significantly as well due to [[counterfeit]] minting; by the 16th century, new maritime trade contacts with Europe provided massive amounts of imported silver, which increasingly became the common [[medium of exchange]].<ref name="fairbank 134 135">Fairbank, 134&ndash;135.</ref> As far back as 1436, the southern grain tax had been partially commuted to payments in silver.<ref name="brook xx">Brook, xx.</ref> In 1581 the Single Whip Reform installed by [[Grand Secretary]] [[Zhang Juzheng]] (1525&ndash;1582) finally assessed taxes on the amount of land paid entirely in silver.<ref>Brook, xxi, 89.</ref>


===Reign of the Yongle Emperor===
Thank you for helping with assessing new pages. Your changes of speedy deletion categories and the addition of templates to already tagged pages is unneccessary though, if you ask me. It doesn't help if pages are swapped from one category to another and adding an additional tag won't speed up their deletion as well. [[User:De728631|De728631]] ([[User talk:De728631|talk]]) 14:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Yongle-Emperor1.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Portrait of the [[Yongle Emperor]] (r. 1402&ndash;1424).]]
====Rise to power====
Hongwu's grandson Zhu Yunwen assumed the throne as the [[Jianwen Emperor]] (1398&ndash;1402) after Hongwu's death in 1398. In a prelude to a three-year-long civil war beginning in 1399,<ref name="robinson 2000 527">Robinson (2000), 527.</ref> Jianwen became engaged in a political showdown with his uncle Zhu Di, the Prince of Yan. Jianwen was aware of the ambitions of his princely uncles, establishing measures to limit their authority. The militant Zhu Di, given charge over the area encompassing Beijing to watch the Mongols on the frontier, was the most feared of these princes. After Jianwen arrested many of Zhu Di's associates, Zhu Di plotted a rebellion. Under the guise of rescuing the young Jianwen from corrupting officials, Zhu Di personally led forces in the revolt; the palace in Nanjing was burned to the ground, along with Zhu Di's nephew Jianwen, his wife, mother, and courtiers. Zhu Di assumed the throne as the [[Yongle Emperor]] (1402&ndash;1424); his reign is universally viewed by scholars as a "second founding" of the Ming Dynasty since he reversed many of his father's policies.<ref name="atwell 2002 84">Atwell (2002), 84.</ref>


====New capital and a restored canal====
== Splitting Microsoft articles ==
Yongle demoted Nanjing to a secondary capital and in 1403 announced the new capital of China was to be at his power base in [[Beijing]]. Construction of a new city there lasted from 1407 to 1420, employing hundreds of thousands of workers daily.<ref name="ebrey east asia 272"/> At the center was the political node of the [[Imperial City (Beijing)|Imperial City]], and at the center of this was the [[Forbidden City]], the palatial residence of the emperor and his family. By 1553, the Outer City was added to the south, which brought the overall size of Beijing to 4 by 4½ miles.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 194">Ebrey (1999), 194.</ref>


[[Image:Noel 2005 Pékin tombeaux Ming voie des âmes.jpg|thumb|left|190px|The [[Ming Dynasty Tombs]] located 50 km (31 miles) north of [[Beijing]]; the site was chosen by Yongle.]]
Why do you keep creating small articles with very little information, and then undoing my attempts to merge them into bigger articles? - [[User:Josh the Nerd|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh the Nerd|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Josh_the_Nerd|contribs]]) 18:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
After laying dormant and dilapidated for decades, the [[Grand Canal (China)|Grand Canal]] was restored under Yongle from 1411&ndash;1415. The impetus for restoring the canal was to solve the perennial problem of shipping grain north to Beijing. Shipping the annual 4,000,000 ''shi'' (one shi is equal to 107 liters) was made difficult with an inefficient system of shipping grain through the [[East China Sea]] or by several different inland canals that necessitated the transferring of grain onto several different barge types in the process, including shallow and deep water barges.<ref>Brook, 46&ndash;47.</ref> Yongle commissioned some 165,000 workers to dredge the canal bed in western [[Shandong]] and built a series of fifteen [[canal lock]]s.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 194"/><ref name="brook 47">Brook, 47.</ref> The reopening of the Grand Canal had implications for Nanjing as well, as it was surpassed by the well-positioned city of [[Suzhou]] as the paramount commercial center of China.<ref name="brook 74 75">Brook, 74&ndash;75.</ref>


Although Yongle ordered episodes of bloody purges like his father—including the execution of Fang Xiaoru who refused to draft the proclamation of his succession—Yongle had a different attitude about the scholar-officials.<ref name="ebrey east asia 272">Ebrey (2006), 272.</ref> He had a selection of texts compiled from the [[Cheng Yi (philosopher)|Cheng]]-[[Zhu Xi|Zhu]] school of Confucianism—or [[Neo-Confucianism]]—in order to assist those who studied for the civil service examinations.<ref name="ebrey east asia 272"/> Yongle commissioned two thousand scholars to create a 50-million word (22,938-chapter) long encyclopedia—the ''[[Yongle Encyclopedia]]''—from seven thousand books.<ref name="ebrey east asia 272"/> This surpassed all previous encyclopedias in scope and size, including the 11th century compilation of the [[Four Great Books of Song]]. Yet the scholar-officials weren't the only political group that Yongle had to cooperate with and appease. Historian Michael Chang points out that Yongle was an "emperor on horseback" who often traversed between two capitals like in the Mongol Yuan tradition and constantly led expeditions into Mongolia.<ref name="chang 2007 66 67">Chang (2007), 66&ndash;67.</ref> This was opposed by the Confucian establishment while it served to bolster the importance of eunuchs and military officers whose power depended upon the emperor's favor.<ref name="chang 2007 66 67"/>


====Treasure fleet====
==Repost of [[:Seed7]]==
[[Image:ShenDuGiraffePainting.jpg|thumb|170px|A [[giraffe]] brought from [[Africa]] in the [[1414|twelfth year of Yongle (1414)]]; the Chinese associated the giraffe with the mythical [[qilin]].]]
[[Image:Information_icon.svg|left]]Hello, this is a message from [[User:CSDWarnBot|an automated bot]]. A tag has been placed on [[:Seed7]], by {{#ifeq:{{{nom}}}|1|[[User:{{{nominator}}}|{{{nominator}}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{{nominator}}}|talk]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{{nominator}}}|contribs]]),}} another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be [[Wikipedia:Speedy deletions|speedily deleted]] from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because [[:Seed7]] was previously deleted as a result of an [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] (or another [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Deletion discussion|XfD]])<br><br>To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting [[:Seed7]], please affix the template <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at [[WP:WMD]]. Feel free to contact the [[User:CSDWarnBot|bot operator]] if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page={{urlencode:Seed7}} here]''' [[User:CSDWarnBot|CSDWarnBot]] ([[User talk:CSDWarnBot|talk]]) 07:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Beginning in 1405, the Yongle Emperor entrusted his favored eunuch commander [[Zheng He]] (1371&ndash;1433) as the naval admiral for a gigantic new fleet of ships designated for international tributary missions. The Chinese had [[Foreign relations of Imperial China|sent diplomatic missions]] over land and west since the [[Han Dynasty]] (202 BCE&ndash;220 CE) and had been engaged in [[Economy of the Song Dynasty|private overseas trade]] leading all the way to [[Chinese exploration|East Africa for centuries]]—culminating in the Song and Yuan dynasties—but no government-sponsored tributary mission of this grandeur and size had ever been assembled before. To service seven different tributary missions abroad, the Nanjing shipyards constructed two thousand vessels from 1403 to 1419, which included the large [[treasure ship]]s that measured 112 m (370 ft) to 134 m (440 ft) in length and 45 m (150 ft) to 54 m (180 ft) in width.<ref name="fairbank 137">Fairbank, 137.</ref> The first voyage from 1405 to 1407 contained 317 vessels with a staff of 70 eunuchs, 180 medical personnel, 5 astrologers, and 300 military officers commanding a total estimated force of 26,800 men.<ref>Fairbank, 137&ndash;138.</ref>


The enormous tributary missions were discontinued after the death of Zheng He, yet his death was only one of many culminating factors which brought the missions to an end. Yongle had [[Fourth Chinese domination (History of Vietnam)|conquered Vietnam]] in 1407, but Ming troops were pushed out in 1428 with significant costs to the Ming treasury; in 1431 the new [[Lê Dynasty]] of Vietnam was recognized as an independent tribute state.<ref name = "fairbank 138"/> There was also the threat and revival of Mongol power on the northern steppe which drew court attention away from other matters; to face this threat, a massive amount of funds were used to build the [[Great Wall of China|Great Wall]] after 1474.<ref name="fairbank 139">Fairbank, 139.</ref> Yongle's moving of the capital from Nanjing to Beijing was largely in response to the court's need of keeping a closer eye on the Mongol threat in the north.<ref>Robinson (1999), 80.</ref> Scholar-officials also associated the lavish expense of the fleets with eunuch power at court, and so halted funding for these ventures as a means to curtail further eunuch influence.<ref>Fairbank, 138&ndash;139.</ref>
== Nomination of [[The Car & Bike Show]] for speedy deletion ==


===Tumu Crisis and the Ming Mongols===
Hi! Thanks for your efforts in cleaning up Wikipedia - much appreciated. However, I haven't deleted [[The Car & Bike Show]], as it isn't a candidate for speedy deletion. The reason is that it does give an indication of notability, albeit a very small, unreferenced amount. I don't believe that the article should exist as it stands, but I can't delete it through the speedy deletion process. I would suggest you [[WP:PROD|PROD]] it or go through the [[WP:AFD|AFD]] process. If you have any questions, please drop me a line on my talk page. [[User:StephenBuxton|StephenBuxton]] ([[User talk:StephenBuxton|talk]]) 12:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
{{main|Tumu Crisis|Rebellion of Cao Qin}}
The [[Oirats|Oirat]] Mongol leader [[Esen Tayisi]] launched an invasion into Ming China in July of 1449. The chief eunuch [[Wang Zhen (eunuch)|Wang Zhen]] encouraged [[Zhengtong Emperor|Emperor Zhengtong]] (r. 1435&ndash;1449) to personally lead a force to face the Mongols after a recent Ming defeat; marching off with 50,000 troops, Zhengtong left the capital and put his half-brother [[Zhu Qiyu]] in charge of affairs as temporary regent. In the battle that ensued on September 8, his force of 50,000 troops were decimated by Esen's army and Zhengtong was captured and held in captivity by the Mongols—an event known as the [[Tumu Crisis]].<ref name="ebrey east asia 273">Ebrey (2006), 273.</ref> After Zhengtong's capture, Esen's forces plundered their way across the countryside and all the way to the suburbs of Beijing.<ref>Robinson (2000), 533&ndash;534.</ref> Following this was another plundering of the Beijing suburbs in November of that year by local bandits and Ming Dynasty soldiers of Mongol descent who dressed as invading Mongols.<ref>Robinson (2000), 534.</ref> Many Han Chinese also took to brigandage soon after the Tumu incident.<ref>''Yingzong Shilu'', 184.17b, 185.5b.</ref><ref>Robinson (1999), 85, footnote 18.</ref>


[[Image:Chemin de ronde muraille long.JPG|thumb|left|200px|The [[Great Wall of China]]; although the [[rammed earth]] walls of the ancient [[Warring States]] were combined into a unified wall under the [[Qin Dynasty|Qin]] and [[Han Dynasty|Han]] dynasties, the vast majority of the brick and stone Great Wall as it is seen today is a product of the Ming Dynasty.]]
{{talkback|StephenBuxton}}
The Mongols held the Zhengtong Emperor for ransom. However, this scheme was foiled once Zhengtong's younger brother assumed the throne as the [[Jingtai Emperor]] (r. 1449&ndash;1457); the Mongols were also repelled once Jingtai's confidant and defense minister [[Yu Qian]] (1398&ndash;1457) gained control of the Ming armed forces. Holding Zhengtong in captivity was a useless bargaining chip for the Mongols as long as another sat on his throne, so they released him back into Ming China.<ref name="ebrey east asia 273"/> Zhengtong was placed under house arrest in the palace until the coup against Jingtai in 1457 known as the "Wresting the Gate Incident".<ref name="robinson 1999 83">Robinson (1999), 83.</ref> Zhengtong retook the throne as the Tianshun Emperor (r. 1457&ndash;1464).


Tianshun's reign was a troubled one and Mongol forces within the Ming military structure continued to be problematic. On August 7, 1461, the Chinese general Cao Qin and his Ming troops of Mongol descent [[Rebellion of Cao Qin|staged a coup against Tianshun]] out of fear of being next on his purge-list of those who aided Jingtai's succession.<ref>Robinson (1999), 84&ndash;85.</ref> Mongols serving the Ming military also became increasingly circumspect as the Chinese began to heavily distrust their Mongol subjects after the Tumu Crisis.<ref>Robinson (1999), 96&ndash;97.</ref> Cao's rebel force managed to set fire to the western and eastern gates of the [[Imperial City (Beijing)|Imperial City]] (doused by rain during the battle) and killed several leading ministers before his forces were finally cornered and he was forced to commit suicide.<ref>Robinson (1999), 79, 103&ndash;108.</ref><ref>Robinson (1999), 108.</ref>
== Small suggestion ==


The Mongol threat to China was at its greatest level in the 15th century, although periodic raiding continued throughout the dynasty. Like in the Tumu Crisis, the Mongol leader [[Altan Khan]] (1507&ndash;1582) invaded China and raided as far as the outskirts of Beijing.<ref name="robinson 1999 81">Robinson (1999), 81.</ref><ref>Laird, 141.</ref> Interestingly enough, the Ming employed troops of Mongol descent to fight back Altan Khan's invasion, as well as Mongol military officers against Cao Qin's abortive coup.<ref>Robinson (1999), 83, 101.</ref> The Mongol incursions prompted the Ming authorities to construct the Great Wall from the late 15th century to the 16th century; John Fairbank notes that "it proved to be a futile military gesture but vividly expressed China's siege mentality."<ref name="fairbank 139"/> Yet the Great Wall was not meant to be a purely defensive fortification; its towers functioned rather as a series of lit beacons and signalling stations to allow rapid warning to friendly units of advancing enemy troops.<ref>Ebrey (1999), 208.</ref>
Hi, in reference to your [[Link flooding]] article, a small suggestion - instead of saving changes to the article several times in a row with very minor changes, consider using the preview button to tweak your editing until you like it, and then save it. Helps save clutter in the history, and if someone else is editing as well, helps cut down on edit conflicts. [[User:Unforgiven24|Unforgiven24]] ([[User talk:Unforgiven24|talk]]) 13:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


=== Isolation to globalization ===
== SpyScan ==
====Illegal trade, piracy, and war with Japan====
[[Image:Wokou.jpg|thumb|200px|16th century [[Wokou|Japanese]] pirate raids.]]
{{see|Qi Jiguang}}
In 1479, the vice president of the Ministry of War burned the court records documenting Zheng He's voyages; it was one of many events signalling China's shift to an inward foreign policy.<ref name="fairbank 138">Fairbank, 138.</ref> Shipbuilding laws were implemented that restricted vessels to a small size; the concurrent decline of the Ming navy allowed the growth of piracy along China's coasts.<ref name="fairbank 139"/> Japanese pirates—or [[wokou]]—began staging raids on Chinese ships and coastal communities, although much of the piracy was carried out by native Chinese.<ref name="fairbank 139"/>


Instead of mounting a counterattack, Ming authorities chose to shut down coastal facilities and starve the pirates out; all foreign trade was to be conducted by the state under the guise of formal tribute missions.<ref name="fairbank 139"/> These policies were known as the [[hai jin]] laws, which enacted a strict ban on private maritime activity until the laws' formal abolishment in 1567.<ref name="fairbank 138"/> In this period government-managed overseas trade with [[Japan]] was carried out exclusively at the seaport of [[Ningbo]], trade with the [[Philippines]] exclusively at [[Fuzhou]], and trade with [[Indonesia]] exclusively at [[Guangzhou]].<ref name="ebrey cambridge 211"/> Even then the Japanese were only allowed into port once every ten years and were allowed to bring a maximum of three hundred men on two ships; these laws encouraged many Chinese merchants to engage in widespread illegal trade and smuggling.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 211"/>
This page is not a speedyable page, hence why I PRODed it; if you read the tag itself it is for pages that read as adverts; things aren't worthy of being CSDed like that just because they are about a product. [[User:Ironholds|<b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b>]][[User talk:Ironholds|<b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b>]] 14:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
:However, then how do you get the page deleted, because it has or is:
* no references
* sounds like advertising
* is not notable
* about a rouge spyware app that is spyware
* written like vandalism
Seeking your opinion on this. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 14:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
:A PROD is a proposed deletion; it gets deleted in 7 days if nobody has a problem with that; if they do, it's sent to AfD and gets deleted that way. In reply to your points:


The low point in relations between Ming China and Japan occurred during the rule of the great Japanese warlord [[Hideyoshi]], who in 1592 announced he was going to conquer China. In two campaigns that are known collectively as the [[Imjin War]], the Japanese fought with the Korean and Ming armies. Both sides won victories in the war but with Hideyoshi's death in 1598, the Japanese gave up their last Korean bases and returned to Japan. Despite this and the great leadership of Koreans such as the admiral [[Yi Sun-sin]], the Ming generals took credit for the victory. However, the victory came at an enormous cost to the Ming government's treasury: some 26,000,000 ounces of silver.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 214">Ebrey (1999), 214.</ref>
*Lack of references do not make something deletion-worth
*It's written nothing like advertising; does calling something "spyware" sound like good advertising to you? personally i'd fire my agent.
*lack of notability, fine, but it is not "non-notable" within a CSD criteria. You can CSD things if they are non notable people, bands, webcontent or companies/clubs, but for other things it gets more complex and you should take it to PROD or AfD. In addition, you didn't tag it as non-notable you tagged it as advertising, something it clearly is not.
*yes, it's about spyware; I fail to see how that makes it deletion-worthy
*It isn't/wasn't written like vandalism, just badly formatted.


====Trade and contact with Europe====
I've replied to your contribution to the Meaburn Staniland AfD, by the way. [[User:Ironholds|<b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b>]][[User talk:Ironholds|<b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b>]] 13:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Ming foreign relations 1580.jpg|thumb|right|210px|Military command centers in 1580, concentrated mostly along the seacoast, the northern border, and the southwest; major courier routes shown are based on a map from Timothy Brook's ''The Confusions of Pleasure''.]]
==[[Imam Mohamud Imam Cumar]]==
Although [[Jorge Álvares]] was the first to land on Lintin Island in the [[Pearl River Delta]] in May of 1513, it was [[Rafael Perestrello]]—a cousin of the famed [[Christopher Columbus]]—who became the first European explorer to land on the southern coast of mainland China and trade in [[Guangzhou]] in 1516, commanding a [[Portuguese Empire|Portuguese]] vessel with a crew from a Malaysian junk that had sailed from [[Malacca]].<ref name="brook 124"/><ref name="pfoundes 89">Pfoundes, 89.</ref><ref>Nowell, 8.</ref> The Portuguese sent a large subsequent expedition in 1517 to enter port at Guangzhou and open formal trade relations with Chinese authorities.<ref name="brook 124">Brook, 124.</ref> During this expedition the Portuguese attempted to send an inland delegation in the name of [[Manuel I of Portugal]] to the court of the Ming emperor Zhengde; instead the diplomatic mission languished in a Chinese jail and died there.<ref name="brook 124"/> After the death of Zhengde in April 1521, the conservative faction at court that was against expanding commercial relations ordered that the [[Portuguese Malacca|Portuguese conquest of Malacca]]—a loyal vassal to the Ming—was grounds enough to reject the Portuguese embassy.<ref name="cambridge 339">Mote et al., 339.</ref> Simão de Andrade, brother to ambassador [[Fernão Pires de Andrade]], had also stirred Chinese speculation that the Portuguese were kidnapping Chinese children to eat them; Simão had purchased kidnapped children as slaves who were later found in [[Diu]], [[India]].<ref name="mote cambridge 337 338">Mote et al., 337&ndash;338.</ref> In 1521, Ming Dynasty naval forces fought and repulsed Portuguese ships at [[Tuen Mun]], where some of the first [[breech-loading weapon|breech-loading]] culverins were introduced to China.<ref>Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 369.</ref> Despite initial hostilities, by 1549 the Portuguese were sending annual trade missions to [[Shangchuan Island]].<ref name="brook 124"/> In 1557 the Portuguese managed to convince the Ming court to agree on a legal port treaty that would establish [[Macau]] as an official Portuguese trade colony on the coasts of the [[South China Sea]].<ref name="brook 124"/> The Portuguese friar [[Gaspar da Cruz]] (c. 1520 &ndash; February 5, 1570) traveled to Guangzhou in 1556 and wrote the first complete book on China and the Ming Dynasty that was published in Europe (fifteen days after his death); it included information on its geography, provinces, royalty, official class, bureaucracy, shipping, architecture, farming, craftsmanship, merchant affairs, clothing, religious and social customs, music and instruments, writing, education, and justice.<ref name="dictionary of ming biography">The Ming Biographical History Project of the Association for Asian Studies, 410&ndash;411.</ref>
Hello
i am the writer of the article Imam Mohamud imam cumar and u sent me a letter that says the article will be deleted.
please i would like to expand as soon as possible.
thanks.--[[User:Abgaaloow|Abgaaloow]] ([[User talk:Abgaaloow|talk]]) 15:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


From China the major exports were silk and porcelain. The [[Dutch East India Company]] alone handled the trade of 6 million porcelain items from China to Europe between the years 1602 to 1682.<ref name="brook 206">Brook, 206.</ref> [[Antonio de Morga]] (1559&ndash;1636), a [[Spain|Spanish]] official in [[Manila]], listed an extensive inventory of goods that were traded by Ming China at the turn of the 17th century, noting there were "rarities which, did I refer to them all, I would never finish, nor have sufficient paper for it".<ref>Brook, 205&ndash;206.</ref> After noting the variety of silk goods traded to Europeans, Ebrey writes of the considerable size of commercial transactions:
==Proposed deletion of Frame injection==
[[Image:Matteo Ricci Far East 1602 Larger.jpg|thumb|200px|Map of [[East Asia]] by the Italian Jesuit [[Matteo Ricci]] in 1602; Ricci (1552&ndash;1610) was the first European allowed into the Forbidden City, taught the Chinese how to construct and play the [[spinet]], translated Chinese texts into [[Latin]] and vice versa, and worked closely with his Chinese associate [[Xu Guangqi]] (1562&ndash;1633) on mathematical work.]]
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]]
A [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] template has been added to the article [[Frame injection]], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for inclusion|criteria for inclusion]], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]" and [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Wikipedia's deletion policy]]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Frame injection|its talk page]].


{{quotation|In one case a galleon to the Spanish territories in the New World carried over 50,000 pairs of silk stockings. In return China imported mostly silver from Peruvian and Mexican mines, transported via Manila. Chinese merchants were active in these trading ventures, and many emigrated to such places as th Philippines and Borneo to take advantage of the new commercial opportunities.|<ref name="ebrey cambridge 211">Ebrey (1999), 211.</ref>}}
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the [[WP:PROD|proposed deletion process]], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion criteria]] or it can be sent to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for Deletion]], where it may be deleted if [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> -- JediLofty <sup>[[User:JediLofty|User]]</sup><sub>[[User talk:JediLofty|Talk]]</sub> 10:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


After the Chinese had banned direct trade by Chinese merchants with Japan, the Portuguese filled this commercial vacuum as intermediaries between China and Japan.<ref name="spence 19 20">Spence, 19&ndash;20.</ref> The Portuguese bought Chinese silk and sold it to the Japanese in return for Japanese-mined silver; since silver was more highly valued in China, the Portuguese could then use Japanese silver to buy even larger stocks of Chinese silk.<ref name="spence 19 20"/> However, by 1573—after the Spanish established a trading base in Manila—the Portuguese intermediary trade was trumped by the prime source of incoming silver to China from the Spanish Americas.<ref name="spence 20">Spence, 20.</ref><ref name="brook 205">Brook, 205.</ref>
==AfD nomination of Frame injection==
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left]]I have nominated [[Frame injection]], an article you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frame injection]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:AFDWarning --> -- JediLofty <sup>[[User:JediLofty|User]]</sup><sub>[[User talk:JediLofty|Talk]]</sub> 13:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


Although the bulk of imports to China were silver, the Chinese also purchased [[New World]] crops from the [[Spanish Empire]]. This included [[sweet potato]]es, [[maize]], and [[peanut]]s, foods that could be cultivated in lands where traditional Chinese staple crops—wheat, millet, and rice—couldn't grow, hence facilitating a rise in the population of China.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 211"/><ref name="crosby 198 201">Crosby, 198&ndash;201.</ref> In the Song Dynasty (960&ndash;1279), rice had become the major staple crop of the poor;<ref>Gernet, 136.</ref> after sweet potatoes were introduced to China around 1560, it gradually became the traditional food of the lower classes.<ref name="crosby 200">Crosby, 200.</ref>
== Wrongpedia ==


=== Decline ===
Why redirect this to "wikipedia"? [[User:Ironholds|<b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b>]][[User talk:Ironholds|<b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b>]] 14:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
====Reign of the Wanli Emperor====
:To stop people against wikipedia from making an article on it(?) [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 14:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
The financial drain of the Imjin War in Korea against the Japanese was one of the many problems—fiscal or other—facing Ming China during the reign of the [[Wanli Emperor]] (r. 1572&ndash;1620). In the beginning of his reign, Wanli surrounded himself with able advisors and made a conscientious effort to handle state affairs. His Grand Secretary [[Zhang Juzheng]] (in office from 1572 to 1582) built up an effective network of alliances with senior officials.<ref name="hucker 31">Hucker, 31.</ref> However, there was no one after him skilled enough to maintain the stability of these alliances;<ref name="hucker 31"/> officials soon banded together in opposing political factions. Over time Wanli grew tired of court affairs and frequent political quarreling amongst his ministers, preferring to stay behind the walls of the Forbidden City and out of his officials' sight.<ref name="spence 16">Spence, 16.</ref>
::They can just click on the link and go there anyway. People are unlikely to do so; if they do then an admin will SALT the page (make it impossible to create a page there). I'd like to ask; could you please read the notability rules and guidelines in greater detail before contributing to AfD's. The existence of a book does not make the author inherently notable. [[User:Ironholds|<b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b>]][[User talk:Ironholds|<b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b>]] 14:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


[[Image:Wanli.jpg|thumb|right|170px|[[Wanli Emperor]] (r. 1572&ndash;1620).]]
Officials aggravated Wanli about which of his sons should succeed to the throne; he also grew equally disgusted with senior advisors constantly bickering about how to manage the state.<ref name="spence 16"/> There were rising factions at court and across the intellectual sphere of China stemming from the philosophical debate for or against the teaching of [[Wang Yangming]] (1472&ndash;1529), the latter of whom rejected some of the orthodox views of [[Neo-Confucianism]].<ref name="ebrey east asia 281 283">Ebrey (2006), 281&ndash;283.</ref><ref>Ebrey (1999), 203&ndash;206, 213.</ref> Annoyed by all of this, Wanli began neglecting his duties, remaining absent from court audiences to discuss politics, lost interest in studying the [[Chinese classic texts|Confucian Classics]], refused to read petitions and other state papers, and stopped filling the recurrent vacancies of vital upper level administrative posts.<ref name="spence 16"/><ref name="ebrey cambridge 194 195"/> Scholar-officials lost prominence in administration as eunuchs became intermediaries between the aloof emperor and his officials; any senior official who wanted to discuss state matters had to persuade powerful eunuchs with a bribe simply to have his demands or message relayed to the emperor.<ref name = "spence 17"/>


====Role of eunuchs====
== Thx (re [[Maintainer]]) ==


It was said that Hongwu forbade eunuchs to learn how to read or engage in politics.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 194"/> Whether or not these restrictions were carried out with absolute success in his reign, eunuchs in the Yongle reign period and after managed huge imperial workshops, commanded armies, and participated in matters of appointment and promotion of officials.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 194"/> The eunuchs developed their own bureaucracy that was organized parallel to but was not subject to the civil service bureaucracy.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 194"/> Although there were several dictatorial eunuchs throughout the Ming, such as Wang Zhen, Wang Zhi, and [[Liu Jin]], excessive tyrannical eunuch power did not become evident until the 1590s when Wanli increased their rights over the civil bureaucracy and granted them power to collect provincial taxes.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 194 195">Ebrey (1999), 194&ndash;195.</ref><ref name="spence 17">Spence, 17.</ref><ref name="hucker 11">Hucker, 11.</ref>
Thanks much for creating the stub for [[Maintainer]]. :-) -- [[Special:Contributions/201.17.36.246|201.17.36.246]] ([[User talk:201.17.36.246|talk]]) 16:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:IMG 0239Tian.JPG|right|thumb|190px|[[Tianqi Emperor|Tianqi era]] teacups, from the Nantoyōsō Collection in Japan; the Tianqi Emperor was heavily influenced and largely controlled by the eunuch [[Wei Zhongxian]] (1568&ndash;1627).]]


The eunuch [[Wei Zhongxian]] (1568&ndash;1627) dominated the court of the [[Tianqi Emperor]] (r. 1620&ndash;1627) and had his political rivals tortured to death, mostly the vocal critics from the faction of the "[[Donglin movement|Donglin Society]]".<ref name="spence 17 18">Spence, 17&ndash;18.</ref> He ordered temples built in his honor throughout the Ming Empire,<ref name="spence 17"/> and built personal palaces created with funds allocated for building the previous emperor's tombs. His friends and family gained important positions without qualifications. Wei also published a historical work lambasting and belitting his political opponents.<ref name="spence 17"/> The instability at court came right as natural calamity, pestilence, rebellion, and foreign invasion came to a peak. Although the [[Chongzhen Emperor]] (r. 1627&ndash;1644) had Wei dismissed from court—which led to Wei's suicide shortly after—the problem with court eunuchs persisted until the dynasty's collapse less than two decades later.
== AFC ==


====Economic breakdown and disaster====
Hello, thanks for your work with the AFC project. I hope you are getting some satisfaction from it and help us to clear the backlog! Just a small note, that when you put the {{tl|WPAFC}} header on the talk page, you should not substitute the template. Also there is an option to classify the article, for example <nowiki>{{WPAFC|class=redirect}}</nowiki> is for redirects created through the AFC process. Further information is in the template documentation. If there is anything I can help you with, just let me know. Cheers! [[User:Msgj|MSGJ]] ([[User talk:Msgj|talk]]) 09:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


During the last years of Wanli's reign and those of his two successors, an economic crisis developed that was centered around a sudden widespread lack of the empire's chief medium of exchange: silver. The [[Protestantism|Protestant]] powers of the [[Dutch Republic]] and the [[Kingdom of England]] staged frequent raids and acts of piracy against the [[Catholicism|Catholic]]-based empires of Spain and Portugal in order to weaken their global economic power.<ref name="spence 19">Spence, 19.</ref> Meanwhile, [[Philip IV of Spain]] (r. 1621&ndash;1665) began cracking down on illegal smuggling of silver from [[Viceroyalty of New Spain|Mexico]] and [[Viceroyalty of Peru|Peru]] across the [[Pacific Ocean|Pacific]] towards China, in favor of shipping American-mined silver directly from Spain to Manila. In 1639, the new [[Tokugawa shogunate|Tokugawa]] regime of Japan shut down most of its foreign trade with European powers, causing a halt of yet another source of silver coming into China. However, the greatest stunt to the flow of silver came from the Americas, while Japanese silver still came into China in limited amounts.<ref name="brook 208">Brook, 208.</ref> Some scholars even assert that the price of silver rose in the 17th century due to a falling demand for goods, not declining silver stocks.<ref name="brook 289">Brook, 289.</ref>
== Microsoft Office articles ==


[[Image:Ch'iu Ying 001.jpg|thumb|left|280px|''Spring morning in a Han palace'', by [[Qiu Ying]] (1494&ndash;1552); excessive luxury and decadence were hallmarks of the late Ming period, spurred by the enormous state [[bullion]] of incoming silver and private transactions involving silver.]]
Please stop undoing my attempts to merge your very small articles into larger articles. Next time you want to split an article, please [[Wikipedia:Talk page|discuss]] it first. Thank you. - [[User:Josh the Nerd|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh the Nerd|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Josh_the_Nerd|contribs]]) 23:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
These events occurring at roughly the same time caused a dramatic spike in the value of silver and made paying taxes nearly impossible for most provinces. People began hoarding precious silver as there was progressively less of it, forcing the ratio of the value of copper to silver into a steep decline.<ref name="spence 20"/> In the 1630s, a string of one thousand copper coins was worth an ounce of silver; by 1640 this was reduced to the value of half an ounce; by 1643 it was worth roughly one-third of an ounce.<ref name="spence 20"/> For peasants this was an economic disaster, since they paid taxes in silver while conducting local trade and selling their crops with copper coins.<ref>Spence, 20&ndash;21.</ref>


In this early half of the 17th century, famines became common in northern China because of unusual dry and cold weather that shortened the growing season; these were effects of a larger ecological event now known as the [[Little Ice Age]].<ref name="spence 21">Spence, 21.</ref> Famine, alongside tax increases, widespread military desertions, a declining relief system, and natural disasters such as flooding and inability of the government to properly manage irrigation and flood-control projects caused widespread loss of life and normal civility.<ref name="spence 21"/> The central government was starved of resources and could do very little to mitigate the effects of these calamities. Making matters worse, a widespread epidemic spread across China from Zhejiang to Henan, killing a large but unknown number of people.<ref name="spence 22 24">Spence, 22&ndash;24.</ref>
== redirects ==


===Fall of the Dynasty===
Please don't create redirects to pages based on every spelling of the words in the title ever in the english language like, ''ever''. It's a waste of your time, counterproductive (in that they take up space without actually doing anything) and completely pointless. If you're out of ideas of things to edit then leave me a message and I can suggest some stuff, but what you're doing now is not helpful, especially for the poor schmucks on NPP. [[User:Ironholds|<b style="color:#D3D3D3">Ir</b><b style="color:#A9A9A9">on</b><b style="color:#808080">ho</b>]][[User talk:Ironholds|<b style="color:#696969">ld</b><b style="color:#000">s</b>]] 23:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
====Rise of the Manchu====
[[Image:ShanhaiguanGreatWall.jpg|thumb|right|[[Shanhaiguan]] along the Great Wall, the gate where the Manchus were repeatedly repelled before being finally let through by [[Wu Sangui]] in 1644.]]
A remarkable tribal leader named [[Nurhaci]] (r. 1616&ndash;1626), starting with just a small tribe, rapidly gained control over all the [[Manchuria]]n tribes. During the Imjin War he offered to lead his tribes in support of the Ming and Joseon army. This offer was declined, but he was granted honorific Ming titles for his gesture.<ref name="spence 27">Spence, 27.</ref> Recognizing the weakness in the Ming authority north of their border, he took control over all of the other unrelated tribes surrounding his homeland.<ref name="spence 27"/> In 1610 he broke relations with the Ming court; in 1618 he demanded the Ming pay tribute to him to redress the ''seven grievances'' which he documented and sent to the Ming court. This was, in a very real sense, a declaration of war as the Ming were not about to pay money to the Manchu.


Under the brilliant commander [[Yuan Chonghuan]] (1584&ndash;1630), the Ming were able to repeatedly fight off the Manchus, notably in 1626 at the [[Battle of Ningyuan]] (In which Nurhaci was mortally wounded) and in 1628. Under Yuan's command the Ming had securely fortified the [[Shanhaiguan|Shanhai pass]], thus blocking the Manchus from crossing the pass to attack the [[Liaodong Peninsula]]. Using European firearms acquired from his cook, he was able to stave off Nurhaci's advances along the [[Liao River]].<ref name="spence 24"/> Although he was named field marshal of all the northeastern forces in 1628, he was executed in 1630 on trumped-up charges of colluding with the Manchus as they staged their raids.<ref name="spence 24 25">Spence, 24&ndash;25.</ref> Succeeding generals proved unable to eliminate the Manchu threat.
== Maintenance templates, maintenance categories and you ==


Unable to attack the heart of Ming directly, the Manchu instead bided their time, developing their own artillery and gathering allies. They were able to enlist Ming government officials and generals as their strategic advisors. A large part of the Ming Army deserted to the Manchu banner. In 1632, they had conquered much of [[Inner Mongolia]],<ref name="spence 24"/> resulting in a large scale recruitment of Mongol troops under the [[Eight Banners|Manchu banner]] and the securing of an additional route into the Ming heartland.
Hi, just in regards to the edits you made to [[GNU Paint]] and [[ESvn]]; it isn't necessary to manually add categories such as [[:Category:Articles to be expanded]], they are added automatically by the <nowiki>{{expand}}</nowiki> template and what tends to happen is people fix the article, remove the template and then can't figure out why it is still in the category! Also please don't "subst:" maintenance templates, as [[User:SmackBot]] can't add the date to the "subst:'d" code. Thanks, <span style="font-size:80%;font-family:tahoma;">'''~ Ame<span style="font-family:arial;">I</span>iorate''' <sub>[[User:AmeIiorate|U]] [[User_talk:AmeIiorate|T]] [[Special:Contributions/AmeIiorate|C]]</sub> '''@'''</span> 23:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


By 1636, the Manchu ruler [[Huang Taiji]] renamed his dynasty from the "Latter Jin" to "[[Qing Dynasty|Qing]]" at [[Shenyang]], which had fallen to the Manchu in 1621 and was made their capital in 1625.<ref name="spence 24">Spence, 24.</ref><ref name="spence 28">Spence, 28.</ref><ref name="chang 2007 92">Chang (2007), 92.</ref> Huang Taiji also adopted the Chinese imperial title ''[[Emperor of China|huangdi]]'' instead of [[Khan (title)|khan]], took the Imperial title [[Huang Taiji|Chongde]] ("Revering Virtue"), and changed the ethnic name of his people from [[Jurchen]] to [[Manchu]].<ref name="spence 31">Spence, 31.</ref><ref name="chang 2007 92"/> In 1638 the Manchu defeated and conquered Ming China's traditional ally [[Joseon]] with an army of 100,000 troops. Shortly after the Koreans renounced their long-held loyalty to the Ming Dynasty.<ref name="spence 31"/>
== Empty talk pages ==


====Rebellion, invasion, collapse====
Hi, I don't think it's helpful to create a talk page for an article, as you've done at [[Talk:Consumer activism]], just by adding the template: {{tl|talkheader}}. If I'm looking at an article, perhaps stub-sorting it, and I see there's a talk page, I'll go there in case there's discussion I ought to read - it's mildly irritating when it's only a project or two, but more irritating if there's nothing there at all (except the template). I think I've noticed you doing this elsewhere, but it isn't standard practice (if it was thought necessary, then I'm sure there would be software doing this automatically whenever a page was created), so I'd be grateful if you could stop. Thanks. [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD|talk]]) 10:03, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Shunzhi Court portrait.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The [[Shunzhi Emperor]] (1644&ndash;1661), proclaimed the ruler of China on October 8, 1644.]]
A peasant soldier named [[Li Zicheng]] (1606&ndash;1644) mutinied with his fellow soldiers in western Shaanxi in the early 1630s after the government failed to ship much-needed supplies there.<ref name="spence 21"/> In 1634 he was captured by a Ming general and released only on the terms that he return to service.<ref>Spence, 21&ndash;22.</ref> The agreement soon broke down when a local magistrate had thirty-six of his fellow rebels executed; Li's troops retaliated by killing the officials and continued to lead a rebellion based in Rongyang, central [[Henan]] province by 1635.<ref name="spence 22">Spence, 22.</ref> By the 1640s, an ex-soldier and rival to Li—[[Zhang Xianzhong]] (1606&ndash;1647)—had created a firm rebel base in [[Chengdu]], [[Sichuan]], while Li's center of power was in [[Hubei]] with extended influence over Shaanxi and Henan.<ref name="spence 22"/>


In 1640, masses of Chinese peasants who were starving, unable to pay their taxes, and no longer in fear of the frequently defeated Chinese army, began to form into huge bands of rebels. The Chinese military, caught between fruitless efforts to defeat the Manchu raiders from the north and huge peasant revolts in the provinces, essentially fell apart. Unpaid and unfed, the army was defeated by Li Zicheng—now self-styled as the Prince of Shun—and deserted the capital without much of a fight.<ref name="spence 25"/> Li's forces were allowed into the city when the gates were treacherously opened from within.<ref name="spence 25"/> On [[May 26]], [[1644]], Beijing fell to a rebel army led by Li Zicheng; during the turmoil, [[Chongzhen Emperor|the last Ming emperor]] hung himself [[Guilty Chinese Scholartree|on a tree in the imperial garden]] right outside the Forbidden City.<ref name="spence 25">Spence, 25.</ref>
== Sandbox ==


Seizing opportunity, the Manchus crossed the [[Great Wall]] after the Ming border general [[Wu Sangui]] (1612&ndash;1678) opened the gates at [[Shanhai Pass]]. This occurred shortly after he learned about the fate of the capital and an army of Li Zicheng marching towards him; weighing his options of alliance, he decided to side with the Manchus.<ref name="spence 32 33">Spence, 32&ndash;33.</ref> The Manchu army under the Manchu Prince [[Dorgon]] (1612&ndash;1650) and Wu Sangui approached Beijing after the army sent by Li was destroyed at [[Shanhaiguan]]; the Prince of Shun's army fled the capital on the fourth of June.<ref name="spence 33">Spence, 33.</ref> On June 6 the Manchus and Wu entered the capital and proclaimed the young [[Shunzhi Emperor]] ruler of China.<ref name="spence 33"/> After being forced out of [[Xi'an]] by the Manchus, chased along the [[Han River (Hanshui)|Han River]] to [[Wuchang, Hubei|Wuchang]], and finally along the northern border of [[Jiangxi]] province, Li Zicheng died there in the summer of 1645, thus ending the [[Shun Dynasty]].<ref name="spence 33"/> One report says his death was a suicide; another states that he was beaten to death by peasants after he was caught stealing their food.<ref name="spence 33"/> Zhang Xianzhong was killed in January of 1647 by Manchu troops after he fled Chengdu and employed [[scorched earth]] policy.<ref>Spence, 34&ndash;35.</ref>
Hi,


Scattered Ming remnants still existed after 1644, including those of [[Koxinga]]. Despite the loss of Beijing and the death of the emperor, Ming power was by no means totally destroyed. Nanjing, Fujian, Guangdong, Shanxi, and Yunnan were all strongholds of Ming resistance. However, there were several pretenders for the Ming throne, and their forces were divided. Each bastion of resistance was individually defeated by the Qing until 1662, when the last real hopes of a Ming revival died with the Yongli emperor, [[Prince of Gui|Zhu Youlang]]. Despite the Ming defeat, smaller loyalist movements continued until the proclamation of the [[Republic of China]].
I received a message from you regarding my sandbox. What seems to be the issue? Isn't my sandbox a place for me to test article and syntax? I just joined so I may be incorrect. I am merely preparing text for an edit I will be making in the future.


==Government==
Thanks
===Province, prefecture, subprefecture, county===
[[jamescp|<small><span style="color: #fff; padding: 1px 5px 0px 5px; background: #cc0000">JCP</span></small>]] 19:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:PanYongzheng-ProcessionalTombFigurines-ShanghaiMuseum-May27-08.jpg|thumb|200px|Processional figurines from the [[Shanghai]] tomb of Pan Yongzheng, a Ming Dynasty official who lived during the 16th century]]


The Ming emperors took over the provincial administration system of the Yuan Dynasty, and the thirteen Ming provinces are the precursors of the modern provinces. Throughout the Song Dynasty, the largest political division was the [[Circuit (country subdivision)|circuit]] (''lu'').<ref>Yuan, 193&ndash;194.</ref> However, after the [[Jingkang Incident|Jurchen invasion]] in 1127, the Song court established four semi-autonomous regional command systems based on territorial and military units, with a detached service secretariat that would become the provincial administrations of the Yuan, Ming, and Qing dynasties.<ref name="hartwell 397 398">Hartwell, 397&ndash;398.</ref> At the provincial level, the Yuan central government structure was copied by the Ming; the bureaucracy contained three provincial commissions: one civil, one military, and one for surveillance. Below the level of the [[Province (China)|province]] (''sheng'') were [[Prefecture (China)|prefectures]] (''fu'') operating under a prefect, followed by [[Zhou (country subdivision)|subprefectures]] (''zhou'') under a subprefect.<ref name="hucker 5">Hucker, 5.</ref> Finally, the lowest unit was the [[County (China)|county]] (''xian'') overseen by a magistrate.<ref name="hucker 5"/> Besides the provinces, there were also two large areas that belonged to no province, but were metropolitan areas (''jing'') attached to Nanjing and Beijing.<ref name="hucker 5"/>
Woops, I guess I clicked the wrong link. I see the error, thanks. [[jamescp|<small><span style="color: #fff; padding: 1px 5px 0px 5px; background: #cc0000">JCP</span></small>]] 19:53, 2 September 2008 (UTC) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jamescp|Jamescp]] ([[User talk:Jamescp|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jamescp|contribs]]) </small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


===Institutions and bureaus===
== speedy tagging ==
====Institutional trends====
[[Image:Gugong.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The [[Forbidden City]], the official imperial household of the Ming and Qing dynasties from 1420 until 1924, when the [[Republic of China]] evicted [[Puyi]] from the Inner Court.]]
Departing from the main central administrative system generally known as the [[Three Departments and Six Ministries]] system, which was instituted by various dynasties since late [[Han Dynasty|Han]], the Ming administration had only one Department, the Secretariat, that controlled the Six Ministries. Following the execution of the [[Chancellor of China|Chancellor]] Hu Weiyong in 1380, emperor Hongwu abolished the Secretariat, the [[Censorate]], and the Chief Military Commission and personally took charge of the Six Ministries and the regional Five Military Commissions.<ref name="hucker 28">Hucker, 28.</ref><ref name="chang 2007 15 footnote 42">Chang (2007), 15, footnote 42.</ref> Thus a whole level of administration was cut out and only partially rebuilt by subsequent rulers.<ref name="hucker 28"/> The [[Grand Secretariat]], at the beginning a secretarial institution that assisted the emperor with administrative paperwork, was instituted, but without employing grand counselors, or [[Chancellor of China|chancellors]]. The ministries, headed by a minister and run by directors remained under direct control of the emperor until the end of the Ming.


The Hongwu Emperor sent his heir apparent to Shaanxi in 1391 to "tour and soothe" (''xunfu'') the region; in 1421 the Yongle Emperor commissioned 26 officials to travel the empire and uphold similar investigatory and patrimonial duties.<ref name="chang 2007 16">Chang (2007), 16.</ref> By 1430 these ''xunfu'' assignments became institutionalized.<ref name="chang 2007 16"/> Hence, the Censorate was reinstalled and first staffed with investigating censors, later with censors-in-chief. By 1453, the "grand coordinators"—or "touring pacifiers" as Michael Chang notes—were granted the title vice censor-in-chief or assistant censor-in-chief and were allowed direct access to the emperor.<ref name="chang 2007 16"/> As in prior dynasties, the provincial administrations were monitored by a travelling inspector from the Censorate. Censors had the power to impeach officials on an irregular basis, unlike the senior officials who were to do so only in triennial evaluations of junior officials.<ref name="hucker 16">Hucker, 16.</ref><ref name="chang 2007 16"/>
Hello. I am a little bit concerned with your use of speedy deletion tags. Note that in the last few minutes the following speedy deletion requests have been declined:
*[[River (ward)]]
*[[G DATA AntiVirus]]
*[[Ochopintre]]
*[[Chasing Darkness]]
*[[Rutherglen castle]]
*[[220 (t.A.T.u. Song)]]
*[[Greatest Hits Volume Two (The Judds album)]]
Some of these articles were the first edit of new users and there is nothing more [[WP:BITE|frustrating and disappointing to new users]] than a speedy deletion notice that appears 20 seconds after they've created the page. Conversely, some of these articles were started by long-standing contributors and you should respect their experience about what is and what isn't a valid encyclopedia article. I think it would be best for you to either stop doing newpage patrol or seek counsel from someone who has been doing it for a while. While I appreciate you trying to help, the fact is that wrong speedy deletion tagging is quite damaging (for the reasons explained above) and time consuming for admins who often have to go back and explain the mistake to new users. When in doubt, try asking the author about the article, see if you can fix it, put it on your watchlist and return to it the next day or send it to [[WP:AFD|AfD]]. Thanks, [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 20:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
:Now why on earth would you tag [[Pocono Mountain West]] for speedy deletion? The article has been there for two years, has been edited by a different editors over that time and has never been the subject of any sort of deletion debates. Sorry but you really have to stop. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 20:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


Although decentralization of state power within the provinces occurred in the early Ming, the trend of central government officials delegated to the provinces as virtual provincial governors began in the 1420s.<ref name="hucker 23">Hucker, 23.</ref> By the late Ming Dynasty, there were central government officials delegated to two or more provinces as supreme commanders and viceroys, a system which reigned in the power and influence of the military by the civil establishment.<ref name="hucker 23"/>
(edit conflict) I've also removed a speedy tag (twice) on [[Dag Achatz]] which you nominated under G1, patent nonsense. I cannot understand why, the article is far from perfect, but it has just been created, and it does need some work, but it's perfectly readable. I know when i started new page patrolling, I sometimes got a bit carried away nominating things for deletion, but just take a breath before you press the button! I found it worked well for me! If you want to have a chat about this, feel free on my talk page or here. :) --[[User:Ged UK|Ged UK]] ([[User talk:Ged UK|talk]]) 20:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


====Grand Secretariat and Six Ministries====
== Tagging a village for speedy deletion citing "no context"? ==
[[Image:Portrait of Jiang Shunfu.jpg|thumb|right|200px|A portrait of the official Jiang Shunfu (1453–1504), now in the [[Nanjing Museum]]. The decoration of two [[Crane (bird)|cranes]] on his chest are a "[[Mandarin square|rank badge]]" that indicate he was a civil official of the first rank.]]
Governmental institutions in China conformed to a similar pattern for some two thousand years, but each dynasty installed special offices and bureaus, reflecting its own particular interests. The Ming administration had the [[Grand Secretaries]] assisting the emperor, with paperwork handled by them under [[Yongle]]'s reign and finally appointed as top officials of agencies and Grand Preceptor, a top-ranking, non-functional civil service post, under the [[Hongxi Emperor]] (r. 1424&ndash;1425).<ref>Hucker, 29&ndash;30.</ref> The Grand Secretariat drew its members from the [[Hanlin Academy]] and were considered part of the imperial authority, not the ministerial one (hence being at odds with both the emperor and ministers at times).<ref name="hucker 30">Hucker, 30.</ref> The Secretariat was a coordinating agency, whereas the Six Ministries—which were Personnel, Revenue, Rites, War, Justice, and Public Works—were direct administrative organs of the state.<ref>Hucker, 31&ndash;32.</ref> The Ministry of Personnel was in charge of appointments, merit ratings, promotions, and demotions of officials, as well as granting of honorific titles.<ref name="hucker 32">Hucker, 32.</ref> The Ministry of Revenue was in charge of gathering census data, collecting taxes, and handling state revenues, while there were two offices of currency that were subordinate to it.<ref name="hucker 33">Hucker, 33.</ref> The Ministry of Rites was in charge of state ceremonies, rituals, and sacrifices; it also oversaw registers for Buddhist and Daoist priesthoods and even the reception of envoys from tributary states.<ref name="hucker 33 35">Hucker, 33&ndash;35.</ref> The Ministry of War was in charge of the appointments, promotions, and demotions of military officers, the maintenance of military installations, equipment, and weapons, as well as the courier system.<ref name="hucker 35">Hucker, 35.</ref> The Ministry of Justice was in charge of judicial and penal processes, but had no supervisory role over the Censorate or the Grand Court of Revision.<ref name="hucker 36">Hucker, 36.</ref> The Ministry of Works was in charge of government construction projects, hiring of artisans and laborers for temporary service, manufacturing government equipment, the maintenance of roads and canals, standardization of weights and measures, and the gathering of resources from the countryside.<ref name="hucker 36"/>


====Bureaus and offices for the imperial household====
In [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angoor_Ada&diff=236309409&oldid=236304392 this edit] you tag [[Angoor Ada]], a recently created article about a Pakistani settlement for speedy deletion citing that the article lacks context. I find this rather incredulous and I urge you to elaborate on your reasoning for this action. __[[User:Meco|meco]] ([[User talk:Meco|talk]]) 20:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Ming-Imperial-Court.jpg|thumb|160px|The Ming Imperial Court, by an unknown artist, c. 1580 AD.]]
The imperial household was staffed almost entirely by eunuchs and ladies with their own bureaus.<ref name="hucker 24">Hucker, 24.</ref> Female servants were organized into the Bureau of Palace Attendance, Bureau of Ceremonies, Bureau of Apparel, Bureau of Foodstuffs, Bureau of the Bedchamber, Bureau of Handicrafts, and Office of Staff Surveillance.<ref name="hucker 24"/> Starting in the 1420s, eunuchs began taking over these ladies' positions until only the Bureau of Apparel with its four subsidiary offices remained.<ref name="hucker 24"/> Hongwu had his eunuchs organized into the Directorate of Palace Attendants, but as eunuch power at court increased, so did their administrative offices, with eventual twelve directorates, four offices, and eight bureaus.<ref name="hucker 24"/> The dynasty had a vast imperial household, staffed with thousands of eunuchs, who were headed by the Directorate of Palace Attendants. The eunuchs were divided into different directorates in charge of staff surveillance, ceremonial rites, food, utensils, documents, stables, seals, apparel, and so on.<ref name="hucker 25">Hucker, 25.</ref> The offices were in charge of providing fuel, music, paper, and baths.<ref name="hucker 25"/> The bureaus were in charge of weapons, silverwork, laundering, headgear, bronzework, textile manufacture, wineries, and gardens.<ref name="hucker 25"/> At times, the most influential eunuch in the Directorate of Ceremonial acted as a ''de facto'' dictator over the state.<ref name="hucker 11"/><ref name="hucker 25"/>


Although the imperial household was staffed mostly by eunuchs and palace ladies, there was a civil service office called the Seal Office, which cooperated with eunuch agencies in maintaining imperial seals, tallies, and stamps.<ref>Hucker, 25&ndash;26.</ref> There were also civil service offices to oversee the affairs of imperial princes.<ref name="hucker 26">Hucker, 26.</ref>
==Speedy deletion of [[:July 2021]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:July 2021]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A3|section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see [[Wikipedia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] subjects and should provide references to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] their content.


===Personnel===
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:July 2021|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:July 2021|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Ottre|Ottre]] ([[User talk:Ottre|talk]]) 22:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
====Scholar-officials====
After the reign of Hongwu—who from 1373 to 1384 staffed his bureaus with officials gathered through recommendations only—the scholar-officials who populated the many ranks of bureaucracy were recruited through a rigorous [[Imperial examinations|examination system]] that was first established by the [[Sui Dynasty]] (581&ndash;618).<ref name="hucker 12"/><ref>Ebrey (2006), 96.</ref><ref>Ebrey (1999), 145&ndash;146.</ref> Theoretically the system of exams allowed anyone to join the ranks of imperial officials (although frowned upon for merchants to join); in reality the time and funding needed to support the study in preparation for the exam generally limited participants to those already coming from the landholding class.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 199">Ebrey (1999), 199.</ref> However, the government did exact provincial quotas while drafting officials.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 198 199"/> This was an effort to curb monopolization of power by landholding gentry who came from the most prosperous regions, where education was the most advanced.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 198 199">Ebrey (1999), 198&ndash;199.</ref> The expansion of the [[Technology of the Song Dynasty#Movable type printing|printing industry since Song times]] enhanced the spread of knowledge and number of potential exam candidates throughout the provinces.<ref>Ebrey (1999), 201&ndash;202.</ref> For young schoolchildren there were printed [[multiplication table]]s and [[primer]]s for elementary vocabulary; for adult examination candidates there were mass-produced, inexpensive volumes of Confucian classics and successful examination answers.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 202">Ebrey (1999), 202.</ref>


[[Image:Ming-Beamtenprüfungen1.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Candidates who had taken the civil service examinations would crowd around the wall where the results were posted; detail from a handscroll in ink and color on silk, by [[Qiu Ying]] (1494&ndash;1552).<ref>Ebrey (1999), 200.</ref>]]
==Speedy deletion of [[:June 2021]]==
As in earlier periods, the focus of the examination was classical Confucian texts,<ref name="hucker 12">Hucker, 12.</ref> while the bulk of test material centered on the [[Four Books]] outlined by [[Zhu Xi]] in the 12th century.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 198">Ebrey (1999), 198.</ref> Ming era examinations were perhaps more difficult to pass since the 1487 requirement of completing the "[[eight-legged essay]]", a departure from basing essays off progressing literary trends.<ref name="hucker 13"/><ref name="ebrey cambridge 198"/> The exams increased in difficulty as the student progressed from the local level, and appropriate titles were accordingly awarded successful applicants. Officials were classified in nine hierarchic grades, each grade divided into two degrees, with ranging salaries (nominally paid in piculs of rice) according to their rank.<ref name="hucker 11 12">Hucker, 11&ndash;12.</ref> While provincial graduates who were appointed to office were immediately assigned to low-ranking posts like the county graduates, those who passed the palace examination were awarded a ''jinshi'' ('presented scholar') degree and assured a high-level position.<ref name="hucker 14">Hucker, 14.</ref><ref>Brook, xxv.</ref> In 276 years of Ming rule and ninety palace examinations, the number of doctoral degrees granted by passing the palace examinations was 24,874.<ref name="hucker 14"/> Ebrey states that "there were only two to four thousand of these ''jinshi'' at any given time, on the order of one out of 10,000 adult males."<ref name="ebrey cambridge 199"/> This was in comparison to the 100,000 ''shengyuan'' ('government students'), the lowest tier of graduates, by the 16th century.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 199"/>
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:June 2021]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A3|section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see [[Wikipedia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] subjects and should provide references to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] their content.


The maximum tenure in office was nine years, but every three years officials were graded on their performance by senior officials.<ref>Hucker, 15&ndash;16.</ref> If they were graded as superior then they were promoted, if graded adequate then they retained their ranks, and if graded inadequate they were demoted one rank.<ref name="hucker 16">Hucker, 16.</ref> In extreme cases, officials would be dismissed or punished.<ref name="hucker 16"/> Only capital officials of grade 4 and above were exempt from the scrutiny of recorded evaluation, although they were expected to confess any of their faults.<ref name="hucker 16"/> There were over 4,000 school instructors in county and prefectural schools who were subject to evaluations every nine years.<ref name="hucker 17">Hucker, 17.</ref> The Chief Instructor on the prefectural level was classified as equal to a second-grade county graduate.<ref name="hucker 17"/> The Supervisorate of Imperial Instruction oversaw the education of the heir apparent to the throne; this office was headed by a Grand Supervisor of Instruction, who was ranked as first class of grade three.<ref name="hucker 26"/>
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:June 2021|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:June 2021|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Ottre|Ottre]] ([[User talk:Ottre|talk]]) 22:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


====Lesser functionaries====
==Speedy deletion of [[:February 2021]]==
Scholar-officials who entered civil service through examinations acted as executive officials to a much larger body of non-ranked personnel called lesser functionaries.<ref name="hucker 18">Hucker, 18.</ref> They outnumbered officials by four to one; Charles Hucker estimates that they were perhaps as many as 100,000 throughout the empire.<ref name="hucker 18"/> These lesser functionaries performed clerical and technical tasks for government agencies.<ref name="hucker 18"/> Yet they should not be confused with lowly lictors, runners, and bearers; lesser functionaries were given periodic merit evaluations like officials and after nine years of service might be accepted into a low civil service rank.<ref name="hucker 18"/> The one great advantage of the lesser functionaries over officials was that officials were periodically rotated and assigned to different regional posts and had to rely on the good service and cooperation of the local lesser functionaries.<ref name="hucker 18 19">Hucker, 18&ndash;19.</ref>
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:February 2021]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A3|section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see [[Wikipedia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] subjects and should provide references to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] their content.


====Eunuchs, princes and generals====
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:February 2021|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:February 2021|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Ottre|Ottre]] ([[User talk:Ottre|talk]]) 22:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Ming Emperor Xuande playing Golf.jpg|thumb|300px|right|The [[Xuande Emperor]] playing [[chuiwan]] with his eunuchs, a game similar to [[golf]], by an anonymous court painter of the Xuande period (1425-1435).]]
Eunuchs during the Ming Dynasty gained unprecedented power over state affairs. One of the most effective means of control was the secret service stationed in what was called the Eastern Depot at the beginning of the dynasty, later the Western Depot.<ref name="hucker 25"/> This secret service was overseen by the Directorate of Ceremonial, hence this state organ's often totalitarian affiliation.<ref name="hucker 25"/> Eunuchs had ranks that were equivalent to civil service ranks, only theirs had four grades instead of nine.<ref>Hucker, 24&ndash;25.</ref>


Princes and descendants of the first Ming emperor were given nominal military commands and large land estates without title. These estates were not feudatories, the princes did not serve any administrative function, and it was only during the reign of the first two emperors that they partook in military affairs.<ref name="hucker 8">Hucker, 8.</ref> By contrast, princes in the Han and Jin Dynasties had been installed as local kings. Although princes served no organ of state administration, princes, consorts of imperial princesses, and ennobled relatives did staff the Imperial Clan Court, which took care of the imperial [[genealogy]].<ref name="hucker 26"/>
==Speedy deletion of [[:May 2021]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:May 2021]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A3|section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see [[Wikipedia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] subjects and should provide references to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] their content.


Like scholar-officials, military generals were ranked in a hierarchic grading system and were given merit evaluations every five years (as opposed to three years for officials).<ref name="hucker 19">Hucker, 19.</ref> However, military officers had less prestige than officials. This was due to their hereditary service (instead of solely merit-based) and Confucian values that dictated those who chose the profession of violence (wu) over the cultured pursuits of knowledge (wen).<ref name="hucker 19"/><ref>Fairbank, 109&ndash;112.</ref> Although seen as less prestigious, military officers were not excluded from taking civil service examinations and after 1478 the military even held their own examinations to test military skills.<ref name="hucker 19 20">Hucker, 19&ndash;20.</ref> In addition to taking over the established bureaucratic structure from the Yuan period, the Ming emperors established the new post of the travelling military inspector. In the early half of the dynasty, men of noble lineage dominated the higher ranks of military office; this trend was reversed during the latter half of the dynasty as men from more humble origins eventually displaced them.<ref name="robinson 1999 116 117">Robinson (1999), 116&ndash;117.</ref>
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:May 2021|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:May 2021|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Ottre|Ottre]] ([[User talk:Ottre|talk]]) 22:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


==Society and culture==
==Speedy deletion of [[Bedder 6]]==
===Literature and arts===
FYI: The speedy deletion of the above article, which was requested by you, has been contested. Please see it's [[Talk:Bedder 6|talk page]] for more details. [[User:AlexJ|AlexJ]] ([[User talk:AlexJ|talk]]) 23:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:B-ChinesischeLackdose.JPG|thumb|right|220px|A Ming Dynasty red [[lacquer]] box with intricate carving of people in the countryside, surrounded by a floral border design.]]
{{see|Ming Dynasty painting}}
As in earlier dynasties, the Ming Dynasty saw a flourishing in the arts, whether it was [[Chinese painting|painting]], [[Chinese poetry|poetry]], [[Music of China|music]], [[Chinese literature|literature]], or [[Chinese opera|dramatic theater]]. Carved designs in [[lacquerware]]s and designs glazed onto [[porcelain]] wares displayed intricate scenes similar in complexity to those in painting. These items could be found in the homes of the wealthy, alongside embroidered silks and wares in [[Chinese jade|jade]], ivory, and [[cloisonné]].<ref name="spence 10">Spence, 10.</ref> The houses of the rich were also furnished with rosewood furniture and feathery [[latticework]]. The writing materials in a scholar's private study, including elaborately carved brush holders made of stone or wood, were all designed and arranged ritually to give an aesthetic appeal.<ref name="spence 10"/>


Connoisseurship in the late Ming period centered around these items of refined artistic taste, which provided work for art dealers and even underground scammers who made phony imitations of originals and false attributions to works of art.<ref name="spence 10"/> This was noted even by the Jesuit [[Matteo Ricci]] while staying in Nanjing, writing that Chinese scam artists were ingenious when it came to making forgeries of artwork and made huge profits.<ref name="brook 224 225">Brook, 224&ndash;225.</ref> However, there were guides to help the wary new connoisseur; in [[Liu Tong]]'s (d. 1637) book printed in 1635, he told his readers various ways to spot a fake and authentic pieces of art.<ref name="brook 225">Brook, 225.</ref> He revealed that a [[Xuande|Xuande era]] (1426&ndash;1435) bronzework could be authenticated if one knew how to judge its sheen; porcelain wares from the Yongle era (1402&ndash;1424) could be judged authentic by their thickness.<ref name="brook 225 226">Brook, 225&ndash;226.</ref>
==AfD nomination of Chelonatheosism==
[[Image:Lofty Mt.Lu by Shen Zhou.jpg|thumb|left|160px|''Lofty [[Mount Lu]]'', by [[Shen Zhou]], 1467.]]
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left]]An article that you have been involved in editing, [[Chelonatheosism]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelonatheosism]]. Thank you. <small>Do you want to [[Template:Bots#Message notification opt out|opt out]] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:Adw --> <span style="background:#CC1010;color:#FFA0A0">'''&nbsp;Blanchardb'''&nbsp;</span>-<small><sup><span style="color:#A62428">[[User:Blanchardb|Me]]•[[User Talk:Blanchardb|MyEars]]•[[Special:Contributions/Blanchardb|MyMouth]]</span></sup></small>- timed 01:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
There was a great amount of literary achievement in the Ming Dynasty. The [[travel literature]] author [[Xu Xiake]] (1587&ndash;1641) published his ''Travel Diaries'' in 404,000 written [[Chinese characters|characters]], with information on everything from local [[History of geography|geography]] to [[mineralogy]].<ref>Needham, Volume 3, 524.</ref><ref>Hargett, 69.</ref> The first reference to the publishing of private newspapers in Beijing was in 1582; by 1638 the Beijing [[Gazette]] switched from using [[woodblock printing|woodblock print]] to [[movable type]] printing.<ref name="brook xxi">Brook, xxi.</ref> The new literary field of the moral guide to business ethics was developed by the late Ming period, for the readership of the merchant class.<ref>Brook, 215&ndash;217.</ref> Although short story fiction was popular as far back as the Tang Dynasty (618&ndash;907),<ref>Ebrey (2006), 104&ndash;105.</ref> and the work of contemporaneous authors such as Xu Guangqi, Xu Xiake, and Song Yingxing were often technical and encyclopedic, the Ming era witnessed the development of the fictional novel. While the gentry elite were educated enough to fully comprehend the language of [[Classical Chinese]], those with rudimentary education—such as women in educated families, merchants, and shop clerks—became a large, potential audience for literature and performing arts that employed [[Vernacular Chinese]].<ref name="ebrey cambridge 202 203">Ebrey (1999), 202&ndash;203.</ref> The ''[[Jin Ping Mei]]''—published in 1610—is considered by some to be the fifth great novel of pre-modern China, in reference to the [[Four Great Classical Novels]]. Two of these novels, the ''[[Water Margin]]'' and ''[[Journey to the West]]'' were products of the Ming Dynasty. To complement the work of fictional novels, the theater scripts of playwrights were equally imaginative. One of the most famous plays in Chinese history, ''[[The Peony Pavilion]]'', was written by the Ming playwright [[Tang Xianzu]] (1550&ndash;1616), with its first performance at the [[Pavilion of Prince Teng]] in 1598.


In contrast to Xu Xiake, who focused on technical aspects in his travel literature, the Chinese poet and official [[Yuan Hongdao]] (1568&ndash;1610) used travel literature to express his desires for individualism as well as autonomy from and frustration with Confucian court politics.<ref name="chang 2007 318 319">Chang (2007), 318&ndash;319.</ref> Yuan desired to free himself from the ethical compromises which were inseparable from the career of a scholar-official.<ref name="chang 2007 319"/> This anti-official sentiment in Yuan's travel literature and poetry was actually following in the tradition of the Song Dynasty poet and official [[Su Shi]] (1037&ndash;1101).<ref name="chang 2007 319">Chang, 319.</ref> Yuan Hongdao and his two brothers—Yuan Zongdao (1560&ndash;1600) and [[Yuan Zhongdao]] (1570&ndash;1623)—were the founders of the Gong'an School of letters.<ref name="chang 2007 318">Chang (2007), 318.</ref> This highly individualistic school of poetry and prose was criticized by the Confucian establishment for its association with intense sensual lyricism, which was also apparent in Ming vernacular novels such as the ''Jin Ping Mei''.<ref name="chang 2007 318"/> Yet even gentry and scholar-officials were affected by the new popular romantic literature, seeking courtesans as soulmates to reenact the heroic love stories which arranged marriages often could not provide or accommodate.<ref name="brook 229 231">Brook, 229&ndash;231.</ref>
== [[Assassin (Song)]] ==


[[Image:Chen Hongshou, leaf album painting.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Painting of flowers, a butterfly, and [[Chinese scholar's rocks|rock sculpture]] by [[Chen Hongshou]] (1598&ndash;1652); small leaf album paintings like this one first [[Culture of the Song Dynasty|became popular in the Song Dynasty]].]]
Hi, I have declined your speedy request for [[Assassin (Song)]] on the grounds that it's not actually nonsense. Please read [[Wikipedia:Patent nonsense]], articles that do not meet either of the two criterion listed are not eligible for CSD G1. Happy to answer any questions you might have on my talk page. [[User:Lankiveil|Lankiveil]] <sup>([[User talk:Lankiveil|speak to me]])</sup> 01:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC).
There were many famous visual artists in the Ming period, including [[Ni Zan]], [[Shen Zhou]], [[Tang Yin]], [[Wen Zhengming]], [[Qiu Ying]], [[Dong Qichang]], and many others. They drew upon the techniques, styles, and complexity in painting achieved by their Song and Yuan predecessors, but added some new techniques and styles. Well-known Ming artists could make a living simply by painting, due to the high costs they demanded for their artworks and the great demand by the highly cultured community to collect precious works of art.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 201">Ebrey (1999), 201.</ref> The artist Qiu Ying was once paid 2.8 kg (100 oz) of silver to paint a long handscroll for the occasion of an eightieth birthday celebration for the mother of a wealthy patron.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 201"/> Renowned artists often gathered an entourage of followers, some who were amateurs who painted while pursuing an official career and others who were full-time painters.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 201"/>


Beyond painters, some potters also became renowned for their artwork, such as [[He Chaozong]] in the early 17th century for his style of [[Blanc-de-Chine|white porcelain]] sculpture. The major production centers for porcelain items in the Ming Dynasty were [[Jingdezhen]] in [[Jiangxi]] province and [[Dehua]] in [[Fujian]] province. The [[Dehua porcelain factories]] catored to European tastes by creating [[Chinese export porcelain]] by the 16th century. In ''The Ceramic Trade in Asia'', Chuimei Ho estimates that only 16% of Chinese ceramic exports in the late Ming were sent to Europe while the rest were destined for Japan and South East Asia.<ref>Brook, 206.</ref>
== Speedy deletion of [[嵌入式linux中文站]] ==
Heve you read the content of this page? It's clearly promotional. Rough translation via Google:
:''Embedded linux points to the broad masses of Chinese embedded linux Chinese fans to provide a study, discussion, study the fine embedded linux platform, all of the services provided free of permanent, welcomed the overwhelming majority of embedded linux enthusiasts often visit our web site, also welcomed Social insight and good corporate sponsorship''
-- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome|talk]]) 11:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


===Religion===
==Userfying articles==
[[Image:SFEC BritMus Asia 021.JPG|thumb|right|200px|Chinese glazed [[stoneware]] statue of a [[Daoist]] deity, from the Ming Dynasty, 16th century.]]
Hi. I see that you've userfied several articles and nominated the resultant redirects for speedy deletion. I wanted to ask you to please take a moment when you do this to let the users know where they may find their work. If you would prefer not to do that, then please don't nominate the resulting redirects immediately for deletion, as this may make it extremely difficult for them to figure out what's happened. A good many people who contribute blatantly incomplete articles to Wikipedia are relatively new and easily puzzled. :) Thanks. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 13:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
For thousands of years the beliefs in [[ancestor worship]] and practices of the ancestral cult were key features of Chinese civilization. The Chinese believed in a host of deities in what is termed as [[Chinese folk religion]]. Other religious denominations in the Ming included the ancient native ideology of [[Daoism]] (Taoism) and foreign originated Buddhism, although distinct [[Chinese Buddhism]] had long since developed.


[[Christianity]] had existed in China since at least the [[Tang Dynasty]] (618&ndash;907), yet the late Ming period saw the first arrival of [[Jesuit China missions|Jesuit missionaries]] from Europe such as [[Matteo Ricci]] and [[Nicolas Trigault]]. There were also other denominations including the [[Dominican Order|Dominicans]] and [[Franciscan]]s.
: Please explain why you are doing this - on the face of it it is extremely disruptive. We now have links from article space to userspace, which is not allowed. [[User:Ros0709|Ros0709]] ([[User talk:Ros0709|talk]]) 15:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


Ricci worked with the Chinese mathematician, astronomer, and agronomist [[Xu Guangqi]] to translate the Greek mathematical work ''[[Euclid's Elements]]'' into Chinese for the first time in 1607. The Chinese were impressed with European knowledge in astronomy, calendrical science, mathematics, hydraulics, and geography. Most European monks presented themselves more as educated elites than religious figures, in an effort to gain trust and admiration from the Chinese.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 212">Ebrey (1999), 212.</ref> However, most Chinese were suspicious and even outright critical of Christianity due to Chinese beliefs and practices that did not coincide with the Christian faith.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 212"/> The highpoint of this contention was the Nanjing Religious Incident of 1616&ndash;1622, a temporary triumph of the Confucian traditionalists when Western missionaries and science were rejected in favor of the belief that Western science derived from a superior Chinese model; this was soon rejected in favor of once again staffing the Imperial Astronomical Board with Western missionaries learned in science.<ref name="wong 30 32">Wong, 30&ndash;32.</ref>
::Well, this is to provide an alternative to flagging with [[WP:CSD|CSD]] so they can work on it in their userspace rather than the main article space. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 15:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


Besides Christianity, the [[Kaifeng Jews]] had a long history in China; Ricci discovered this when he was contacted by one of them in Beijing and learned of [[History of the Jews in China|their history in China]].<ref>White, Volume 1, 31&ndash;38.</ref> [[Islam in China]] had existed since the early 7th century [[Islam during the Tang Dynasty|during the Tang Dynasty]]; [[Islam during the Ming Dynasty|during the Ming Dynasty]] there were several prominent figures—including [[Zheng He]]—who were Muslim. The Hongwu Emperor also employed Muslim commanders in his army, such as Chang Yuqun, [[Lan Yu]], Ding Dexing, and [[Mu Ying]].<ref>Lipman, 39.</ref>
::: But there's no suggestion these are articles in development is there? There's no note to the user so that they understand what you've done and this isn't standard practice. [[User:Ros0709|Ros0709]] ([[User talk:Ros0709|talk]]) 15:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


===Philosophy===
:::: It appears to me that you are using this as a back door method to speedy delete articles without being an adminsitrator and which in some cases wouldn't be speedy candidates (especially in some cases ([[Woolwell TTC]]) you've then tagged the article space article for speedy delete as a redirect to user space. In at least one case ([[Numbered street]]) you've got it wrong as the user didn't want it moved (as they've moved it back) and the article still hasn't been deleted - indeed I doubt it could be speedied. Although I am not aware of any specific policy against what you're doing it certainly goes against the spirit of the [[WP:DP|deletion policy]] and against established practice. IMO it is [[WP:CIVIL|not very civil]]. Therefore I urge you to stop this course of action. [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk|talk]]) 15:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Wang-yang-ming.jpg|thumb|right|180px|[[Wang Yangming]] (1472&ndash;1529), considered the most influential Confucian thinker since [[Zhu Xi]].]]
====Wang Yangming's Confucianism====
During the Ming Dynasty, the doctrines of the Song Dynasty scholar-official [[Zhu Xi]] (1130&ndash;1200) and [[Neo-Confucianism]] were embraced by the court and the Chinese literati at large. However, total conformity to a single mode of thought was never a reality in the intellectual sphere of society. There were some in the Ming who—like [[Su Shi]] (1037&ndash;1101) of the Song—were rebels at heart and were not abashed to criticize the mainstream dogmatic modes of thought. Leading a new strand of Confucian teaching and philosophy was the scholar-official [[Wang Yangming]] (1472&ndash;1529), whose critics said that his teachings were contaminated by [[Zen|Chan Buddhism]].<ref name="ebrey east asia 282">Ebrey (2006), 282.</ref>


In analyzing Zhu Xi's concept of "the extension of knowledge" (i.e. gaining understanding through careful and rational investigation of things and events), Wang realized that universal principles were concepts espoused in the minds of all.<ref name="ebrey east asia 281">Ebrey (2006), 281.</ref> Breaking from the mold, Wang said that anyone, no matter what socioeconomic status or background, could become as wise as the ancient sages [[Confucius]] and [[Mencius]], and that the writings of the latter two were not the source of truth, but merely guides that could have flaws if carefully examined.<ref name="ebrey east asia 281 282">Ebrey (2006), 281&ndash;282.</ref> In Wang's mind, a peasant who had many experiences and drew natural truths from these was more wise than an official who had carefully studied the Classics but had not experienced the real world in order to observe what was true.<ref name="ebrey east asia 281 282"/>
::::: (It appears this way to me also, although I did not say so per [[WP:AGF]]). A further problem is that the article is _supposed_ to be edited by all. Any editor can dispute a speedy tag and any editor can work on it. If you move it into user space they can't. I think you should assume that if any editor creates an article in article space, that's where they want it. [[User:Ros0709|Ros0709]] ([[User talk:Ros0709|talk]]) 16:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


====Conservative reaction====
::::: Good point - I should probably have said that I assume their reasons for doing it are good (I can certainly understand their reasoning). I was pointing out what it looks like and why this may not be a good idea. I don't think they're delibrately ignoring policy but it looks that way and that's likely to result in problems for them. Thanks for pointing out that I could have put it better. [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk|talk]]) 16:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Confucius on his way to Luoyang.jpg|thumb|right|200px|A Ming Dynasty print drawing of [[Confucius]] on his way to the [[Zhou Dynasty]] capital of [[Luoyang]].]]
Conservative Confucian officials were wary of Wang's philosophical interpretation of the [[Chinese classic texts|Confucian classics]], the increasing number of his disciples while still in office, and his overall socially-rebellious message.<ref name="ebrey east asia 282"/> To curb his political influence he was often sent out to deal with military affairs and rebellions far away from the capital.<ref name="ebrey east asia 282"/> Yet his ideas penetrated mainstream Chinese thought, and spurred new interest in Daoism and Buddhism.<ref name="ebrey east asia 282"/> Furthermore, people began to question the validity of the social hierarchy and the idea that the scholar was above the farmer.<ref name="ebrey east asia 282"/> Wang Yangming's disciple and salt-mine worker Wang Gen gave lectures to commoners about pursuing education to improve their lives, while his follower He Xinyin challenged the elevation and emphasis of the family in Chinese society.<ref name="ebrey east asia 282"/> He's contemporary [[Li Zhi (Ming Dynasty)|Li Zhi]] (1527&ndash;1602) even taught that women were the intellectual equals of men and should be given a better education; both Li and He eventually died in prison, jailed on charges of spreading "dangerous ideas".<ref name="ebrey east asia 283">Ebrey (2006), 283.</ref> Yet these "dangerous ideas" of educating women had long been embraced with mothers giving their children primary education,<ref name="ebrey cambridge 158">Ebrey (1999), 158.</ref> as well as [[courtesan]]s who were as literate and similarly trained in calligraphy, painting, and poetry as their male hosts.<ref name="brook 230">Brook, 230.</ref>


In opposition to the liberal views of Wang Yangming were the conservative officials in the censorate—a governmental institution with the right and responsibility to speak out against malfeasance and abuse of power—and the senior officials of the [[Donglin Academy]], which was reestablished in 1604.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 213">Ebrey (1999), 213.</ref> These conservatives wanted a revival of orthodox Confucian ethics. Conservatives such as Gu Xiancheng (1550&ndash;1612) argued against Wang Yangming's idea of innate moral knowledge, stating that this was simply a legitimization for unscrupulous behavior such as greedy pursuits and personal gain.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 213"/> These two strands of Confucian thought created factionalism amongst ministers of state, who—[[Society of the Song Dynasty#Political partisanship and reform|like the old days]] of [[Wang Anshi]] and [[Sima Guang]] in the Song Dynasty—used any opportunity to impeach members of the other faction from court.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 213"/>
:::::: I moved a couple of the articles back but stopped (a) because that's edit warring somewhat, and (b) because most can't move back anyway - the redired from the original place is in the way. Looks like this needs admin intervention. I'll take this to AN/I but Tohd8BohaithuGh1 - are you in agreement with this? [[User:Ros0709|Ros0709]] ([[User talk:Ros0709|talk]]) 16:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


===Urban and rural life===
:::::: I've moved some back as well and have also tagged some I can't for speedy delete (the one in article space that is) so they can be moved back - I think there's consensus enough here that the moves were in error that it isn't really edit warring. [[User:Dpmuk|Dpmuk]] ([[User talk:Dpmuk|talk]]) 16:36, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Wang Gen was able to give philosophical lectures to many commoners from different regions because—following the trend already apparent in the Song Dynasty—communities in Ming society were becoming less isolated as the distance between market towns was shrinking.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 206">Ebrey (1999), 206.</ref> Schools, descent groups, religious associations, and other local voluntary organizations were increasing in number and allowing more contact between educated men and local villagers.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 206"/> [[Jonathan Spence]] writes that the distinction between what was town and country was blurred in Ming China, since suburban areas with farms were located just outside and in some cases within the walls of a city.<ref name="spence 13">Spence, 13.</ref> Not only was the blurring of town and country evident, but also of socioeconomic class in the traditional four occupations, since artisans sometimes worked on farms in peak periods and farmers often traveled into the city to find work during times of dearth.<ref name="spence 13"/>
←Hi. Just to provide context here for all parties, there ''are'' cases where userfication may be appropriate, as set forth at [[Wikipedia:Userfication]], and it can even be a courtesy. However, that document ''does'' address usage of this technique to circumvent the deletion process, which ''is'' inappropriate. It should only be used in obvious cases. Using it inappropriately may be disruptive. And, as I indicated above, we should communicate with users when we do this, as otherwise they are unlikely to find their content. New contributors are not usually familiar enough with the Wikipedia environment to check their contribution history, for example. There is one template for userfication with which I am familiar, [[Template:Nn-userfy]]. This one should be used with care, and only when it clearly applies. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] <sup>[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]</sup> 16:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


[[Image:Freer 024.jpg|thumb|left|300px|''Emperor Minghuang's Journey to Sichuan'', a Ming Dynasty painting after [[Qiu Ying]] (1494-1552).]]
==Speedy deletion of [[:We've Got The Toaster]]==
A variety of occupations could be chosen or inherited from a father's line of work. This would include—but was not limited to—coffinmakers, ironworkers and blacksmiths, tailors, cooks and noodle-makers, retail merchants, tavern, teahouse, or winehouse managers, shoemakers, seal cutters, pawnshop owners, brothel heads, and merchant bankers engaging in a proto-banking system involving notes of exchange.<ref name="spence 12 13">Spence, 12&ndash;13.</ref><ref name="spence 20"/> Virtually every town had a [[brothel]] where female and male prostitutes could be had.<ref>Brook, 229 & 232.</ref> Male catamites fetched a higher price than female concubines since [[pederasty]] with a teenage boy was seen as a mark of elite status, regardless of [[sodomy]] being repugnant to sexual norms.<ref>Brook, 232&ndash;233.</ref> [[Public bathing]] became much more common than in earlier periods.<ref>Schafer (1956), 57.</ref> Urban shops and retailers sold a variety of goods such as [[Joss paper|special paper money]] to burn at ancestral sacrifices, specialized luxury goods, headgear, fine cloth, teas, and others.<ref name="spence 12 13"/> Smaller communities and townships too poor or scattered to support shops and artisans obtained their goods from periodic market fairs and traveling peddlers.<ref name="spence 13"/> A small township also provided a place for simple schooling, news and gossip, matchmaking, religious festivals, traveling theater groups, tax collection, and bases of famine relief distribution.<ref name="spence 13"/>
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as [[:We've Got The Toaster]], to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]].


Farming villagers in the north spent their days harvesting crops like wheat and millet, while farmers south of the [[Huai River]] engaged in intensive rice cultivation and had lakes and ponds where ducks and fish could be raised. The cultivation of mulberry trees for silkworms and tea bushes could be found mostly south of the [[Yangzi River]]; even further south of this [[sugarcane]] and citrus were grown as basic crops.<ref name="spence 13"/> Some people in the mountainous southwest made a living by selling lumber from hard bamboo. Besides cutting down trees to sell wood, the poor also made a living by turning wood into charcoal, burning [[oyster]] shells to make [[lime]], fired pots, and wove mats and baskets.<ref name="brook 95">Brook, 95.</ref> In the north traveling by horse and carriage was most common, while in the south the myriad of rivers, canals, and lakes provided cheap and easy water transport. Although the south had the characteristic of the wealthy landlord and tenant farmers, there were on average many more owner-cultivators north of the Huai River due to harsher climate, living not far above subsistence level.<ref name="spence 14">Spence, 14.</ref>
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:We've Got The Toaster|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:We've Got The Toaster|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Fatal!ty|Fatal!ty<font color="red" size="5px"></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Fatal!ty|(T☠LK)<font color="blue" size="5px"></font>]]</sup> 15:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
:Why did you then redirect it to [[User:Emmaissocoollike/We've Got The Toaster]]? --[[User:Fatal!ty|Fatal!ty<font color="red" size="5px"></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Fatal!ty|(T☠LK)<font color="blue" size="5px"></font>]]</sup> 15:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
::I did not redirect it; it was automatically redirected when I moved it. That's why I flagged it for deletion. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 16:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
:::kk, sorry for the inconvenience. --[[User:Fatal!ty|Fatal!ty<font color="red" size="5px"></font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Fatal!ty|(T☠LK)<font color="blue" size="5px"></font>]]</sup> 16:06, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


== Me and problems ==
==Science and technology==
{{see|History of science and technology in China|List of Chinese inventions|List of Chinese discoveries}}
[[Image:Chinese Puddle and Blast Furnace.jpg|thumb|left|250px|The puddling process of smelting iron [[ore]] to make [[pig iron]] from [[wrought iron]], with the right illustration displaying men working a [[blast furnace]], from the ''[[Song Yingxing|Tiangong Kaiwu]]'' encyclopedia, 1637.]]


Compared to the flourishing of [[Song Dynasty#Technology, science, and engineering|science and technology in the Song Dynasty]], the Ming Dynasty perhaps saw fewer advancements in science and technology compared to the pace of discovery in the [[Western world]]. In fact, key advances in Chinese science in the late Ming were spurred by contact with Europe. In 1626 [[Johann Adam Schall von Bell]] wrote the first Chinese treatise on the [[telescope]], the ''Yuanjingshuo'' (''Far Seeing Optic Glass''); in 1634 the last Ming [[Chongzhen Emperor|emperor Chongzhen]] acquired the telescope of the late [[Johann Schreck]] (1576&ndash;1630).<ref>Needham, Volume 3, 444&ndash;445.</ref> The [[heliocentrism|heliocentric]] model of the solar system was rejected by the Catholic missionaries in China, but [[Johannes Kepler]] and [[Galileo Galilei]]'s ideas slowly trickled into China starting with the Polish Jesuit [[Michael Boym]] (1612&ndash;1659) in 1627, Adam Schall von Bell's treatise in 1640, and finally [[Joseph Edkins]], [[Alex Wylie]], and [[John Fryer]] in the 19th century.<ref>Needham, Volume 3, 444&ndash;447.</ref> Catholic Jesuits in China would promote [[Nicolaus Copernicus|Copernican]] theory at court, yet at the same time embrace the [[Ptolemy|Ptolemaic]] system in their writing; it was not until 1865 that Catholic missionaries in China sponsored the heliocentric model as their Protestant peers did.<ref name="wong 31">Wong, 31 (footnote 1).</ref> Although [[Shen Kuo]] (1031&ndash;1095) and [[Guo Shoujing]] (1231&ndash;1316) had laid the basis for [[History of trigonometry|trigonometry]] in China, another important work in Chinese trigonometry would not be published again until 1607 with the efforts of Xu Guangqi and Matteo Ricci.<ref>Needham, Volume 3, 110.</ref> Ironically, some inventions which had their origins in ancient China were reintroduced to China from Europe during the late Ming; for example, the [[Field mill (carriage)|field mill]].<ref>Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 255&ndash;257.</ref>
Hi
Thanks for your welcome message. I'm interested to know where I've gone wrong - still new to this!
Thanks


The [[Chinese calendar]] was in need of reform since it inadequately measured the [[solar year]] at 365¼ days, giving an error of 10 min and 14 sec a year or roughly a full day every 128 years.<ref name="kuttner 1975 166">Kuttner (1975), 166.</ref> Although the Ming had adopted Guo Shoujing's ''Shoushi'' calendar of 1281, which was just as accurate as the [[Gregorian Calendar]], the Ming Directorate of Astronomy failed to periodically readjust it; this was perhaps due to their lack of expertise since their offices had become hereditary in the Ming and the Statutes of the Ming prohibited private involvement in astronomy.<ref name="engelfriet 78"/> A sixth-generation descendant of Emperor Hongxi, the "Prince" [[Zhu Zaiyu]] (1536&ndash;1611), submitted a proposal to fix the calendar in 1595, but the ultra-conservative astronomical commission rejected it.<ref name="kuttner 1975 166"/><ref name="engelfriet 78">Engelfriet (1998), 78.</ref> It should be noted that this was the same Zhu Zaiyu who discovered the system of tuning known as [[equal temperament]], a discovery made simultaneously by [[Simon Stevin]] (1548&ndash;1620) in Europe.<ref>Kuttner (1975), 166&ndash;167.</ref> In addition to publishing his works on music, he was able to publish his findings on the calendar in 1597.<ref name="engelfriet 78"/> A year earlier, the memorial of Xing Yunlu suggesting a calendrical improvement was shot down by the Supervisor of the Astronomical Bureau due to the law banning private practice of astronomy; Xing would later serve with Xu Guangqi in reforming the calendar in 1629 according to Western standards.<ref name="engelfriet 78"/>
([[User:Tonytunnycliffe|Tonytunnycliffe]] ([[User talk:Tonytunnycliffe|talk]]) 22:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC))


[[Image:Ricciportrait.jpg|thumb|right|Portrait of [[Matteo Ricci]] by Yu Wenhui, Latinized as Emmanuel Pereira, dated the year of Matteo's death, 1610]]
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User:Disavian/Userboxes/No Evil Boxes]] ==
When the Ming founder Hongwu came upon the mechanical devices housed in the Yuan Dynasty's palace at Khanbaliq—such as fountains with balls dancing on their jets, [[Automaton|self-operating tiger automata]], dragon-headed devices that spouted mists of perfume, and [[Striking clock|mechanical clocks]] in the tradition of [[Yi Xing]] (683&ndash;727) and [[Su Song]] (1020&ndash;1101)—he associated all of them with the decadence of Mongol rule and had them destroyed.<ref name="needham volume 4 part 2 133 508">Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 133 & 508.</ref> This was described in full length by the Divisional Director of the Ministry of Works, Xiao Xun, who also carefully preserved details on the architecture and layout of the Yuan Dynasty palace.<ref name="needham volume 4 part 2 133 508"/> Later, European Jesuits such as Matteo Ricci and [[Nicolas Trigault]] would briefly mention indigenous Chinese clockworks that featured drive wheels.<ref name="needham volume 4 part 2 438">Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 438.</ref> However, both Ricci and Trigault were quick to point out that 16th century European clockworks were far more advanced than the common time keeping devices in China, which they listed as [[water clock]]s, [[incense clock]]s, and "other instruments...with wheels rotated by sand as if by water."<ref name="needham volume 4 part 2 509">Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 509.</ref> Chinese records—namely the ''Yuan Shi''—describe the 'five-wheeled sand clock', a mechanism pioneered by Zhan Xiyuan (fl. 1360&ndash;1380) which featured the scoop wheel of Su Song's earlier [[astronomical clock]] and a [[Dial (measurement)|stationary dial face]] over which a pointer circulated, similar to European models of the time.<ref name="needham volume 4 part 2 511">Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 511.</ref> This sand-driven wheel clock was improved upon by Zhou Shuxue (fl. 1530&ndash;1558) who added a fourth large gear wheel, changed gear ratios, and widened the orifice for collecting sand grains since he criticized the earlier model for clogging up too often.<ref name="needham volume 4 part 2 510 511">Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 510&ndash;511.</ref>


The Chinese were intrigued with European technology, but so were visiting Europeans of Chinese technology. In 1584, [[Abraham Ortelius]] (1527&ndash;1598) featured in his atlas ''Theatrum Orbis Terrarum'' the peculiar Chinese innovation of [[Wheelbarrow#The Chinese Sailing Carriage|mounting masts and sails onto carriages]], just like [[Junk (ship)|Chinese ships]].<ref name="needham volume 4 part 2 276">Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 276.</ref> [[Juan González de Mendoza|Gonzales de Mendoza]] also mentioned this a year later—noting even the designs of them on Chinese silken robes—while [[Gerardus Mercator]] (1512&ndash;1594) featured them in his atlas, [[John Milton]] (1608&ndash;1674) in one of his famous poems, and [[Andreas Everardus van Braam Houckgeest]] (1739&ndash;1801) in the writings of his travel diary in China.<ref>Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 274&ndash;276.</ref>
Userboxen go to [[WP:MFD|Miscellany for deletion]], not AFD. I would have moved it for you, but I see nothing harmful about this userbox. How do you think it's POV? [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 19:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:He Chaozong 1.JPG|thumb|right|180px|Bodhisattva [[Manjusri]] in ''[[Blanc-de-Chine]]'', by [[He Chaozong]], 17th century; [[Song Yingxing]] devoted an entire section of his book to the [[Chinese ceramics|ceramics industry]] in the making of porcelain items like this.<ref>Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 171&ndash;172.</ref>]]
:I'd also like to know how it's POV, if you don't mind. Funnily enough, the userbox itself has a link to [[WP:MFD]]. —[[User:Disavian|Disavian]] ([[User talk:Disavian|<sup>talk</sup>]]/[[Special:Contributions/Disavian|<sub>contribs</sub>]]) 20:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


The encyclopedist [[Song Yingxing]] (1587&ndash;1666) documented a wide array of technologies, metallurgic and industrial processes in his ''Tiangong Kaiwu'' encyclopedia of 1637. This includes mechanical and hydraulic powered devices for agriculture and irrigation,<ref>Song, 7&ndash;30, 84&ndash;103.</ref> nautical technology such as vessel types and [[snorkeling]] gear for pearl divers,<ref name>Song, 171&ndash;172, 189, 196.</ref><ref>Needham, Volume 4, Part 3, 668</ref><ref>Needham, Volume 4, Part 3, 634, 649&ndash;650, 668&ndash;669.</ref> the annual processes of [[sericulture]] and weaving with the [[loom]],<ref>Song, 36&ndash;56.</ref> metallurgic processes such as the [[crucible]] technique and [[quench]]ing,<ref>Song, 237, 190.</ref> manufacturing processes such as for roasting iron [[pyrite]] in converting sulphide to oxide in [[sulfur]] used in gunpowder compositions—illustrating how ore was piled up with coal briquettes in an earthen furnace with a still-head that sent over sulfur as vapor that would solidify and [[crystallization|crystallize]]<ref>Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 126.</ref>—and the use of gunpowder weapons such as a [[naval mine]] ignited by use of a rip-cord and [[wheellock|steel flint wheel]].<ref>Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 205, 339 F.</ref>
== Removing my page. ==


Focusing on agriculture in his ''Nongzheng Quanshu'', the agronomist [[Xu Guangqi]] (1562&ndash;1633) took an interest in irrigation, fertilizers, famine relief, economic and textile crops, and empirical observation of the elements that gave insight into early understandings of chemistry.<ref>Needham, Volume 6, Part 2, 65&ndash;66.</ref>
Hi there,


There were many advances and new designs in gunpowder weapons during the beginning of the dynasty, but by the mid to late Ming the Chinese began to frequently employ European-style artillery and firearms.<ref name="needham volume 5 part 7 372">Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 372.</ref> The ''[[Huolongjing]]'', compiled by [[Jiao Yu]] and [[Liu Ji]] sometime before the latter's death on May 16, 1375 (with a preface added by Jiao in 1412),<ref name="needham volume 5 part 7 24 25">Needam, Volume 5, Part 7, 24&ndash;25.</ref> featured many types of cutting-edge gunpowder weaponry for the time. This includes hollow, gunpowder-filled [[round shot|exploding cannonballs]],<ref name="needham volume 5 part 7 264">Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 264.</ref> [[land mine]]s that used a complex trigger mechanism of falling weights, pins, and a steel wheellock to ignite the train of fuses,<ref name="needham volume 5 part 7 203 205">Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 203&ndash;205.</ref> naval mines,<ref>Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 205.</ref> fin-mounted winged rockets for [[aerodynamic]] control,<ref>Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 498&ndash;502.</ref> [[multistage rocket]]s propelled by [[booster rocket]]s before igniting a swarm of smaller rockets issuing forth from the end of the missile (shaped like a dragon's head),<ref>Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 508.</ref> and [[hand cannon]]s that had up to [[gun barrel|ten barrels]].<ref>Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 229.</ref>
I have been trying desperatley to understand why my page is being removed.


[[Li Shizhen]] (1518&ndash;1593)—one of the most renowned [[pharmacology|pharmacologists]] and physicians [[Traditional Chinese medicine|in Chinese history]]—belonged to the late Ming period. In 1587, he completed the first draft of his ''[[Bencao Gangmu]]'', which detailed the usage of over 1,800 medicinal drugs. Although it purportedly was invented by a [[Daoist]] hermit from [[Mount Emei]] in the late 10th century, the process of [[inoculation]] for [[smallpox]] patients was in widespread use in China by the reign of the [[Longqing Emperor]] (r. 1567&ndash;1572), long before it was applied anywhere else.<ref>Temple (1986), 137.</ref> In regards to [[oral hygiene]], the [[ancient Egypt]]ians had a primitive toothbrush of a twig frayed at the end, but the Chinese were the first to invent the modern [[toothbrush|bristle toothbrush]] in 1498, although it used stiff pig hair.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=The Library of Congress|date=2007-04-04|url=http://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/mysteries/tooth.html|title=Who invented the toothbrush and when was it invented?|accessdate=2008-08-18}}</ref>
I have dedited out the content that seems to be soliciting a company, so I don't uderstand specifically, what I am doing wrong.


==Population==
Can you help me.
[[Image:Chen Hongshou, Appreciating Plums, detail.jpg|thumb|left|160px|''Appreciating Plums'', by [[Chen Hongshou]] (1598 - 1652) showing a lady holding an oval fan whilst enjoying the beauty of the plum.]]


[[Sinology|Sinologist historians]] still debate the actual population figures for each era in the Ming Dynasty. The historian Timothy Brook notes that the Ming government census figures are dubious since fiscal obligations prompted many families to underreport the number of people in their households and many county officials to underreport the number of households in their jurisdiction.<ref name="brook 27">Brook, 27.</ref> Children were often underreported, especially female children, as shown by skewed population statistics throughout the Ming.<ref name="brook 267"/> Even adult women were underreported;<ref name="brook 97 99">Brook, 97&ndash;99.</ref> for example, the Daming Prefecture in [[Hebei|North Zhili]] reported a population of 378,167 males and 226,982 females in 1502.<ref name="brook 97">Brook, 97.</ref> The government attempted to revise the census figures using estimates of the expected average number of people in each household, but this did not solve the widespread problem of tax registration.<ref name="brook 28 267">Brook, 28, 267.</ref>
What parts of the articvel are in appropriate and I will gladly change them.


The number of people counted in the census of 1381 was 59,873,305; however, this number dropped significantly when the government found that some 3 million people were missing from the tax census of 1391.<ref name="brook 27 28">Brook, 27&ndash;28.</ref> Even though underreporting figures was made a capital crime in 1381, the need for survival pushed many to abandon the tax registration and wander from their region, where Hongwu had attempted to impose rigid immobility on the populace.<ref name="brook 28">Brook, 28.</ref> The government tried to mitigate this by creating their own conservative estimate of 60,545,812 people in 1393.<ref name="brook 28"/> In his ''Studies on the Population of China'', Ho Ping-ti suggests revising the 1393 census to 65 million people, noting that large areas of North China and frontier areas were not counted in that census.<ref>Ho, 8&ndash;9, 22, 259.</ref> Brook states that the population figures gathered in the official censuses after 1393 ranged between 51 and 62 million, while the population was in fact increasing.<ref name="brook 28"/> Even the [[Hongzhi Emperor]] (r. 1487&ndash;1505) remarked that the daily increase in subjects coincided with the daily dwindling amount of registered civilians and soldiers.<ref name="brook 95"/> William Atwell states that around 1400 the population of China was perhaps 90 million people, citing Heijdra and Mote.<ref name="atwell 2002 86">Atwell (2002), 86.</ref>
Hope you can help[[User:Yitzhaac Pesach|Yitzhaac Pesach]] ([[User talk:Yitzhaac Pesach|talk]]) <span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment was added at 20:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


[[Image:Xuande.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The [[Xuande Emperor]], (r. 1425&ndash;1435); he stated in 1428 that his populace was dwindling due to palace construction and military adventures, but in fact the population was rising under him, a fact noted by Zhou Chen—Governor of [[Hebei|South Zhili]]—in his 1432 report to the throne about widespread itinerant commerce.<ref name="brook 28"/>]]
==Inappropriate use of speedy deletion==
Historians are now turning to local [[gazetteer]]s of Ming China for clues that would show consistent growth in population.<ref name="brook 267">Brook, 267.</ref> Using the gazetteers, Brook estimates that the overall population under the [[Chenghua Emperor]] (r. 1464&ndash;1487) was roughly 75 million,<ref name="brook 28 267"/> despite mid-Ming census figures hovering around 62 million.<ref name="brook 95"/> While prefectures across the empire in the mid-Ming period were reporting either a drop in or stagnant population size, local gazetteers reported massive amounts of incoming vagrant workers with not enough good cultivated land for them to till, so that many would become drifters, conmen, or wood-cutters that contributed to deforestation.<ref>Brook, 94&ndash;96.</ref> The [[Hongzhi Emperor|Hongzhi]] and [[Zhengde Emperor|Zhengde]] emperors lessened the penalties against those who had fled their home region, while the [[Jiajing Emperor]] (r. 1521&ndash;1567) finally had officials register migrants wherever they had moved or fled in order to bring in more revenues.<ref name="brook 97"/>


Even with Jiajing's reforms to document migrant workers and merchants, by the late Ming era the government census still did not accurately reflect the enormous growth in population. Gazetteers across the empire noted this and made their own estimations of the overall population in the Ming, some guessing that the population had doubled, tripled, or even grown fivefold since 1368.<ref name="brook 162">Brook, 162.</ref> Fairbank estimates that the population was perhaps 160 million in the late Ming Dynasty,<ref name="fairbank 128">Fairbank, 128.</ref> while Brook estimates 175 million,<ref name="brook 162"/> and Ebrey states perhaps as large as 200 million.<ref name="ebrey cambridge 197"/> However, a great epidemic that entered China through the northwest in 1641 ravaged the densely populated areas along the Grand Canal; a gazatteer in northern [[Zhejiang]] noted more than half the population fell ill that year and that 90% of the local populace in one area was dead by 1642.<ref name="brook 163">Brook, 163.</ref>
With regard to your third request for speedy deletion of [[Bedder 6]] may I draw your attention to the lead of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Criteria for speedy deletion]], specifically the part which says "Where reasonable doubt exists, discussion using another method under the deletion policy should occur instead.". In the page history, you'll notice "00:05, 6 September 2008 RMHED (Talk | contribs) (2,663 bytes) (not spam)" - this constitutes reasonable doubt over the speedy. Please do not re-add the speedy request. If you feel strongly that the article does not meet the requirements to have an article on Wikipedia, please go through the standard deletion process, which allows for discussion and debate. [[User:AlexJ|AlexJ]] ([[User talk:AlexJ|talk]]) 20:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
:And Proposed Deletion is for articles which are "uncontroversially a deletion candidate". Again with two editors, plus myself contesting the deletion request it's not exactly uncontroversial. I've now done what you should have and nominated it for the standard deletion procedure, which'll allow for discussion. In my experience on WP, I've found engaging in conversation is much more productive than sticking tags everywhere. [[User:AlexJ|AlexJ]] ([[User talk:AlexJ|talk]]) 22:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


==See also==
== schedule for deletion ==
*[[Kaifeng flood of 1642]]
*[[List of tributaries of Imperial China]]
*[[Luchuan-Pingmian Campaigns]]
*[[Ming Dynasty military conquests]]
*[[Ming official headwear]]
*[[Ye Chunji]] (for further information on rural economics in the Ming)
*[[Ming Dynasty family tree]]
*[[1421 Hypothesis]]


== Notes ==
You have scheduled an article I just wrote for deletion, however you left no further information as to why. I was wondering If you could provide me with any further information as to why. The article is "List of number-one rock hits of 2003 (UK)"
{{reflist|3}}
Thank you
--[[User:Hammard|Hammard]] ([[User talk:Hammard|talk]]) 21:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


==your use of prods==
== References ==
<div class="references-small">
*Information Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China (2002). ''Testimony of History''. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.
*The Ming Biographical History Project of the Association for Asian Studies. (1976). ''Dictionary of Ming Biography, 1368-1644: 明代名人傳: Volume 1, A-L''. Edited by L. Carrington Goodrich and Chaoying Fang. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231038011.
*Andrew, Anita N. and John A. Rapp. (2000). ''Autocracy and China's Rebel Founding Emperors: Comparing Chairman Mao and Ming Taizu''. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. ISBN 0847695808.
*Atwell, William S. "Time, Money, and the Weather: Ming China and the "Great Depression" of the Mid-Fifteenth Century," ''The Journal of Asian Studies'' (Volume 61, Number 1, 2002): 83&ndash;113.
*Brook, Timothy. (1998). ''The Confusions of Pleasure: Commerce and Culture in Ming China''. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-22154-0 (Paperback).
*Chan, Hok-Lam. (1988). "The Chien-wen, Yung-lo, Hung-shi, and Hsuan-te reigns," in ''The Cambridge History of China: Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1'', 182&ndash;384, edited by Denis Twitchett and John K. Fairbank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521243327.
*Chang, Michael G. (2007). ''A Court on Horseback: Imperial Touring & the Construction of Qing Rule, 1680&ndash;1785''. Cambridge: Published by Harvard University Asia Center; distributed by Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-02454-0.
*Crosby, Alfred W., Jr. (2003). The ''Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492; 30th Anniversary Edition''. Westport: Praeger Publishers. ISBN 0-275-98092-8.
*Dreyfus, Georges. (2003). "Cherished memories, cherished communities: proto-nationalism in Tibet," in ''The History of Tibet: Volume 2, The Medieval Period: c. AD 850–1895, the Development of Buddhist Paramountcy'', 492&ndash;522, ed. Alex McKay. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415308429.
*Ebrey, Patricia Buckley, Anne Walthall, James B. Palais. (2006). ''East Asia: A Cultural, Social, and Political History''. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 0-618-13384-4.
*{{Harvrefcol|Surname=Ebrey|Given=Patricia Buckley|Year=1999|Title=The Cambridge Illustrated History of China|Place=Cambridge|Publisher=Cambridge University Press|ISBN=0-521-66991-X|}}
*Engelfriet, Peter M. (1998). ''Euclid in China: The Genesis of the First Translation of Euclid's Elements in 1607 & Its Reception Up to 1723''. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill. ISBN 9004109447.
*{{Harvrefcol|Surname1=Fairbank|Given1=John King|Surname2=Goldman|Given2=Merle |Year=2006|Title=China: A New History; Second Enlarged Edition|Cambridge|The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press|ISBN=0-674-01828-1|}}
*Gascoigne, Bamber. (2003). ''The Dynasties of China: A History''. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers. ISBN 0-7867-1219-8 (Paperback).
*Geiss, James. (1988). "The Cheng-te reign, 1506-1521," in ''The Cambridge History of China: Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1'', 403&ndash;439, edited by Denis Twitchett and John K. Fairbank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521243327.
*Gernet, Jacques (1962). ''Daily Life in China on the Eve of the Mongol Invasion, 1250-1276''. Translated by H. M. Wright. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-0720-0
*Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1997). ''The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet and the Dalai Lama''. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0520219511.
*Hargett, James M. "Some Preliminary Remarks on the Travel Records of the Song Dynasty (960-1279)," ''Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews'' (CLEAR) (July 1985): 67-93.
*Hartwell, Robert M. "Demographic, Political, and Social Transformations of China, 750-1550," ''Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies'' (Volume 42, Number 2, 1982): 365–442.
*Ho, Ping-ti. (1959). ''Studies on the Population of China: 1368&ndash;1953''. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
*Hoffman, Helmut. (2003). "Early and Medieval Tibet" in ''The History of Tibet: Volume 1, The Early Period to c. AD 850, the Yarlung Dynasty'', 45&ndash;69, ed. Alex McKay. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415308429.
*Hucker, Charles O. "Governmental Organization of The Ming Dynasty," ''Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies'' (Volume 21, December 1958): 1&ndash;66.
*Kolmaš, Josef. (1967). ''Tibet and Imperial China: A Survey of Sino-Tibetan Relations Up to the End of the Manchu Dynasty in 1912: Occasional Paper 7''. Canberra: The Australian National University, Centre of Oriental Studies.
*Kuttner, Fritz A. "Prince Chu Tsai-Yü's Life and Work: A Re-Evaluation of His Contribution to Equal Temperament Theory," ''Ethnomusicology'', Vol. 19, No. 2 (May, 1975): 163-206.
*Laird, Thomas. (2006). ''The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama''. New York: Grove Press. ISBN 978-0-8021-827-1.
*Langlois, John D., Jr. (1988). "The Hung-wu reign, 1368&ndash;1398," in ''The Cambridge History of China: Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1'', 107&ndash;181, edited by Denis Twitchett and John K. Fairbank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521243327.
*Lipman, Jonathan. ''Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China''. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 1998.
*Mote, Frederick W. and Denis Twitchett. (1998). ''The Cambridge History of China; Volume 7&ndash;8''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-24333-5 (Hardback edition).
*Needham, Joseph (1986). ''Science and Civilization in China: Volume 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth''. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd.
*Needham, Joseph (1986). ''Science and Civilization in China: Volume 4, Physics and Physical Technology, Part 2, Mechanical Engineering''. Taipei: Caves Books Ltd.
*Needham, Joseph (1986). ''Science and Civilization in China: Volume 4, Physics and Physical Technology, Part 3, Civil Engineering and Nautics''. Taipei: Caves Books Ltd.
*Needham, Joseph (1986). ''Science and Civilization in China: Volume 5, Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Part 7, Military Technology; the Gunpowder Epic''. Taipei: Caves Books Ltd.
*Needham, Joseph (1986). ''Science and Civilization in China: Volume 6, Biology and Biological Technology, Part 2: Agriculture''. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd.
*Norbu, Dawa. (2001). ''China's Tibet Policy''. Richmond: Curzon. ISBN 0700704744.
*Nowell, Charles E. "The Discovery of the Pacific: A Suggested Change of Approach," ''The Pacific Historical Review'' (Volume XVI, Number 1; February, 1947): 1&ndash;10.
*Perdue, Peter C. (2000). "Culture, History, and Imperial Chinese Strategy: Legacies of the Qing Conquests," in ''Warfare in Chinese History'', 252&ndash;287, edited by Hans van de Ven. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill. ISBN 9004117741.
*Pfoundes, C. "Notes on the History of Eastern Adventure, Exploration, and Discovery, and Foreign Intercourse with Japan," ''Transactions of the Royal Historical Society'' (Volume X; 1882): 82&ndash;92.
*Robinson, David M. "Banditry and the Subversion of State Authority in China: The Capital Region during the Middle Ming Period (1450-1525)," ''Journal of Social History'' (Spring 2000): 527&ndash;563.
*Robinson, David M. "Politics, Force and Ethnicity in Ming China: Mongols and the Abortive Coup of 1461," ''Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies'' (Volume 59, Number 1, June 1999): 79&ndash;123.
*Schafer, Edward H. "The Development of Bathing Customs in Ancient and Medieval China and the History of the Floriate Clear Palace," ''Journal of the American Oriental Society'' (Volume 76, Number 2, 1956): 57&ndash;82.
*Song, Yingxing, translated with preface by E-Tu Zen Sun and Shiou-Chuan Sun (1966). ''T'ien-Kung K'ai-Wu: Chinese Technology in the Seventeenth Century''. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
*Spence, Jonathan D. (1999). ''The Search For Modern China; Second Edition''. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-97351-4 (Paperback).
*Sperling, Elliot. (2003). "The 5th Karma-pa and some aspects of the relationship between Tibet and the Early Ming," in ''The History of Tibet: Volume 2, The Medieval Period: c. AD 850–1895, the Development of Buddhist Paramountcy'', 473–482, ed. Alex McKay. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415308429.
*Temple, Robert. (1986). ''The Genius of China: 3,000 Years of Science, Discovery, and Invention''. With a forward by Joseph Needham. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc. ISBN 0671620282.
*Wakeman, Frederick, Jr. "Rebellion and Revolution: The Study of Popular Movements in Chinese History," ''The Journal of Asian Studies'' (1977): 201&ndash;237.
*Wang, Jiawei and Nyima Gyaincain. (1997). ''The Historical Status of China's Tibet''. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press. ISBN 7801133048.
*Weidner, Marsha. (2001). "Imperial Engagements with Buddhist Art and Architecture: Ming Variations of an Old Theme," in ''Cultural Intersections in Later Chinese Buddhism'', 117&ndash;144, edited by Marsha Weidner. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 0824823087.
*White, William Charles. (1966). ''The Chinese Jews'' (Vol. 1-3). New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corporation.
*Wong, H.C. "China's Opposition to Western Science during Late Ming and Early Ch'ing," ''Isis'' (Volume 54, Number 1, 1963): 29&ndash;49.
*Wylie, Turrell V. (2003). "Lama Tribute in the Ming Dynasty" in ''The History of Tibet: Volume 2, The Medieval Period: c. AD 850&ndash;1895, the Development of Buddhist Paramountcy'', ed. Alex McKay. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415308429.
*Yuan, Zheng. "Local Government Schools in Sung China: A Reassessment," ''History of Education Quarterly'' (Volume 34, Number 2; Summer 1994): 193–213.
</div>


== Further reading ==
i had to rvv a few prods you did today because you just have just but the prod up and leaving it blank please put a reason in the prod to say way the article should be deleted please do keep putting up blank prods thanks and please do not readd them to articles which have the prod already removed. articles can not be proded twice please take to afd for you want ok.[[User:Oo7565|Oo7565]] ([[User talk:Oo7565|talk]]) 02:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
*Huang, Ray. (1982). ''1587, A Year of No Significance: The Ming Dynasty in Decline''. New Haven: Yale University Press.
*'''Source''' for "Fall of the Ming Dynasty":- Dupuy and Dupuy's "Collins Encyclopedia of Military History"


==External links==
: Just to way in. You really do need to make sure you put a reason that is based in policy/guidelines. People otherwise will take your PRODs out of context and you will lose the good faith that people normally try to extend to people on here. BTW one of the articles you PRODed [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bedder_6| Bedder 6]] is at AfD now (possibly others as well). You may wish to visit the debate and let us know the reasons you think the article (and the others you PRODed) should be deleted. [[Special:Contributions/83.100.221.38|83.100.221.38]] ([[User talk:83.100.221.38|talk]]) 13:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
{{Commonscat|Ming Dynasty}}
*[http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/prehistory/china/later_imperial_china/ming.html The Ming Dynasty at Minnesota State University]
*[http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/ming/hd_ming.htm Ming Dynasty art at the Metropolitan Museum of Art]
{{Start box}}
{{Succession box|title=[[Dynasties in Chinese history]]|before=[[Yuan Dynasty]]|after=[[Shun Dynasty]]|years=1368–1644}}
{{end box}}
{{Empires}}
{{featured article}}


[[Category:Ming Dynasty| ]]
== Edit summaries ==
[[Category:1368 establishments]]
[[Category:1662 disestablishments]]


{{Link FA|he}}
Could you please use real edit summaries when you edit? An edit summary of "edited page" is not helpful to other editors. Its quite obvious you edited the page since your name is on the history list of the article. Editors would like to know what it is you did. As well please don't mark edits as minor when they're not truly minor. Marking edits minor is only for minor spelling mistakes fixes or small formatting fixes. If you're editing more than a few characters on a page you should not mark them minor. After looking at your recent edits I've also started this thread on AN/I to get some more input regarding them [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Tohd8BohaithuGh1.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29_recent_edits]].--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 13:11, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
{{Link FA|zh}}
:and through a slip of my mouse, that edit wasn't supposed to be minor^^--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 13:11, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
[[ar:أسرة مينج]]

[[bs:Dinastija Ming]]
== User sandboxes ==
[[bg:Мин]]

[[ca:Dinastia Ming]]
I undid your edits to user sandboxes, as I couldn't see any problems with them, and you had replaced the headers with the Wikipedia Sandbox version, which is incorrect as they are user sandboxes. Although many of them were not edited recently, they are still permitted, unless they are being used for deleted content or otherwise not related to the encyclopedia, and then they should be nominated for deletion (at [[WP:MFD|Miscellany for deletion]]) if you think they should be deleted. --[[User:Snigbrook|Snigbrook]] [[User talk:Snigbrook|<sup><span style="color:red">(</span><span style="color:green">talk</span><span style="color:red">)</span></sup>]] 14:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
[[cs:Dynastie Ming]]

[[cy:Brenhinllin Ming]]
::this and some other problems are now being discussed at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. You may wish to comment. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 17:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
[[da:Ming-dynastiet]]
:::Please don't edit my sandbox to delete my stuff [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Matilda/sandbox&diff=238013385&oldid=234245083 ] - thanks --[[User:Matilda|Matilda]] <sup>[[User_talk:Matilda|talk]]</sup> 20:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
[[de:Ming-Dynastie]]

[[et:Mingi dünastia]]
== Sethayrabe ==
[[el:Δυναστεία Μινγκ]]
Hi <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Secthayrabe|Secthayrabe]] ([[User talk:Secthayrabe|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Secthayrabe|contribs]]) 16:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
[[es:Dinastía Ming]]

[[eo:Dinastio Ming]]
== Really Awesome Welcome Message ==
[[eu:Ming dinastia]]

[[fr:Dynastie Ming]]
I saw the welcome message you used on [[User talk:Westhydeian]]. Do you mind posting the link to it on my talk page so that I may use it in the future? <font color="amaranth">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NuclearWarfare]]</font>''''' <sup><font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|contact me]]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="purple">[[Special:Contributions/NuclearWarfare|My work]]</font></sub> 23:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
[[zh-classical:明]]
:I'm not sure it's a good idea one editor putting a template on that tells people to go to another editor's talk page! [[User:Dougweller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 06:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
[[ko:명나라]]
::No that isn't a terribly good idea. You're volunteering someone for something I'm fairly certain they didn't volunteer for.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 06:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
[[hr:Dinastija Ming]]
:::I've told CocoaGuy. [[User:Dougweller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 06:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
[[id:Dinasti Ming]]

[[is:Mingveldið]]
== Administrator's Noticeboard / Incidents posting regarding your edits ==
[[it:Dinastia Ming]]
Hello, Tohd8BohaithuGh1. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Tohd8BohaithuGh1.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29 recent edits|your recent edits]]. Please respond to some of the requests for clarification. Your failure to respond or explain some of your more confusing edits could be seen as disruptive and possibly leading to blocks. Please take the time to respond at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Tohd8BohaithuGh1.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29 recent edits]]. Thank you -[[User:Optigan13|Optigan13]] ([[User talk:Optigan13|talk]]) 09:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
[[he:שושלת מינג]]
:You've been asked to explain some of your edits and failed to do so. You've also been asked not to edit other users pages and also continued to do so. If you continue to make these kinds of edits and not engage in any kind of discussion or explanation of them, they can be seen as disruptive.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 22:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
[[lv:Min dinastija]]
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br> The next time you disrupt Wikipedia{{#if:|, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]]}}, you '''will''' be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-generic4 -->
[[lb:Ming-Dynastie]]
--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 08:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[[lt:Ming dinastija]]

[[hu:Ming-dinasztia]]
It's probably important for you to realize that this would definitely not be a case of "blocking people randomly". In fact, it would be the textbook useful block: when an editor, despite good intentions has a negative net effect on the project, we block him until problems are addressed. You seem unwilling to admit mistakes and unwilling to listen to concerns and adjust your editing. Currently, the effort that others are forced to put into monitoring your edits and repairing the damage outweighs the benefits of your good edits. You can stubbornly refuse to listen but don't expect others to put up with it. I'll copy this on your talk page with a few extra problems that were not mentioned above. ''(paragraph copied from the ANI thread)''
[[mr:मिंग राजवंश]]
Among other problems: if you look at your move log [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=move&user=Tohd8BohaithuGh1&page=&year=&month=-1] there are many instances in which you've moved things into userspace without notifying the creator. The result is that the redirect is deleted and that the user has no clue where his page was moved. In addition, some of these pages don't even belong in userspace because they should be deleted as spam or because they're perfectly good stubs that are sent to userspace oblivion for no good reason. It's a bit difficult for me to show you the diffs because the deleted history is only available to admins (like myself) but it's a real problem that requires people to clean up behind you. You also seem to be userfying articles on fairly random criteria, as if you userfy newpages that you're not sure what to do with. So I'm sorry if I sound unfriendly or [[WP:DICK|dickish]] but the next time you screw up with newpage patrol or the next time you use [[WP:PROD|prod tags]] improperly, I'm blocking the account until you either promise to stop working in this area or promise to get some sort of mentoring to do it properly. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 20:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[[ms:Dinasti Ming]]
:I also note that you're approved for AWB. Note that this can also be taken away if you're careless. It's one thing to fix problems that you create here and there, it's another to fix a bunch of batch edits. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 20:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[[nl:Mingdynastie]]
::You've been making far more mistakes than just that. Editing other users sandboxes, reverting new users in the main sandbox, etc.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 21:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[[ja:明]]
::And could you stop with the misleading edit summaries? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ramappa_temple&diff=prev&oldid=238864190] This is NOT link repair. You're creating redirects.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 21:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[[no:Ming-dynastiet]]
Was there some part of don't edit other people's user space you didn't understand before? Whether you're fixing redirects or otherwise, please refrain from changing things in other people's user space, edits like these [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Curps/Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=239662858] are not appropriate.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 06:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
[[nds:Ming-Dynastie]]
:and this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AAllbrowniesarespecial&diff=239356451&oldid=239353780] is boderline uncivil and disruptive.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 07:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
[[pl:Dynastia Ming]]

[[pt:Dinastia Ming]]
::This is getting ridiculous. I would like a response and a promise to stop. If not, I see no alternative but to block you. [[User:Dougweller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 07:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
[[ro:Dinastia Ming]]
I noticed you took the time to come back and edit (and getting yourself another note on your behaviour in the process) the previous warning about a block stands. You were again asked to explain your edits and you have failed to do so. This can only be seen as disruptive behaviour and your next disruptive edit will result in a block since you can't be bothered to discuss things or alter your behaviour.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 12:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
[[ru:Мин (династия)]]
::Fine, sorry about the edit, I did not know that though. I was not even making a big change, just a small fix. I promise to stop disruptive edits to Wikipedia. If you still wish to block me, then go ahead and do so. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 15:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
[[simple:Ming Dynasty]]
:::A small fix was adding a POV tag to a users page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AAllbrowniesarespecial&diff=239356451&oldid=239353780]? That also requires clarification not just the editing of other users pages in general.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 00:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
[[sl:Dinastija Ming]]
::::Well, I did not realize that it was in the user space. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 00:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
[[sr:Династија Минг]]
:::::What did you think it was? that wikipedia had an article whose sole content was 'soccer is the best sport ever'? And your response was to add a pov tag to that?--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 01:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
[[sh:Dinastija Ming]]

[[fi:Ming-dynastia]]
==Reversion==
[[sv:Mingdynastin]]
Unfortunately I had to rollback your edits of [[Decipherment of rongorongo]] as they broke the referencing system and made it illegible. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[[th:ราชวงศ์หมิง]]
:Please explain the "referencing system" that you are talking about. You're saying that my edits in using <nowiki>{{cite web}}</nowiki> are bad? [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 23:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[[vi:Nhà Minh]]
::They were for that article which is a [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates]] and used a different style of referencing (the Harvard style). When you changed the references you made the references illegible. If you look at an old version of the article after you changed it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decipherment_of_rongorongo&diff=238895536&oldid=238895274] and look down at the references, you will see what I mean. Also, it is not permissible to change the reference style of an article's primary editor without discussing it and getting consensus on the talk page first. Regards, &mdash;[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 23:32, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[[tr:Ming Hanedanı]]
:::Okay, thanks for explaining. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 23:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
[[uk:Династія Мін]]

[[zh-yue:大明]]
== Adoption, please look into it ==
[[zh:明朝]]

You've run into a lot of problems lately regarding your edits, which is no big deal as we all make mistakes. The problem was you didn't really respond or change when people pointed them out to you, which you're doing now which is great. But I think you would have a much better time on wikipedia if you found a user to [[WP:ADOPT|adopt you]], so they could work with you on all the various things you're interested in and help point out and clean up any mistakes. -[[User:Optigan13|Optigan13]] ([[User talk:Optigan13|talk]]) 00:34, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

== Your "Confusing" tag on [[Richard Gage]] ==

Could you specify what needs clarification on [[Richard Gage]]? Thanks. [[User:TheMolecularMan|TheMolecularMan]] ([[User talk:TheMolecularMan|talk]]) 19:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

==Thanks==
Thanks for your welcome. Best wishes! -[[User:Dicting|Dicting]] ([[User talk:Dicting|talk]]) 19:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

== |-|ELLO, th4n|<S T0 J00 PH0R \/\/elC0|\/|1NG |\/|e ==

|-|ELLO, th4n|<S T0 J00 PH0R \/\/elC0|\/|1NG |\/|e \/\/ItH +h4T $+up1|) +3mPL4t3 0ph YouR$. \/\/1|<iPedi4 1$ BOriNG. \/\/1K1P3|)1a is ThE \/\/0rL|)'5 LaR9E5T 3|\|CyCLoPEdI4. Te|-| kWIc|< BROWn r4+ |\/|4rCh3|) 0vEr tEh D3$3R+. [[User:7ealT-ba9|7ealT-ba9]] ([[User talk:7ealT-ba9|talk]]) 21:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
:Uhh, could you please care to un-1337 your text so that I can understand it? [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 21:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
|\/|3, i dO No+ U|\| LEE+ |\/|Y |\/|E5$@935 5O jU5+ li\/e wi+|-| 1T 0R 3LS3 I \/\/ILL 5u3 the mese@ge 0n 4he t@1k P@G3. [[User:7ealT-ba9|7ealT-ba9]] ([[User talk:7ealT-ba9|talk]]) 21:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

==Welcoming==
Hi: nice to see another welcomer (I do it myself), but I noticed that a lot of the users you are welcoming have not yet made their first edit. I don't know whether you're aware, but there is a convention that users - whether anons or account holders - are not welcomed until after they have first contributed. This helps save on server resources, since many named accounts never actually edit, and it also allows the use of more specialised welcome templates like [[Template:Welcomespam]] and [[Template:Welcometest]] if a first edit turns out to be unhelpful. See [[Wikipedia:Welcoming_committee#Users_without_any_edits]] for details. Cheers, <strong>[[User:Karenjc|<font color="red">Ka</font>]][[User_talk:Karenjc|renjc]]</strong> 11:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

==welcome==
thank you for much kind welcome mr tohd8BohaithuGH1 <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jeansaregoodyes|Jeansaregoodyes]] ([[User talk:Jeansaregoodyes|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jeansaregoodyes|contribs]]) 16:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Merlin ==

==MERLIN==
Are You A Fan Of The New TV Show MERLIN On BBC One If So A New Wikia Has Just Started On www.merlin.wikia.com and it desperatly needs pages editing and adminastrators so if you would like to edit or be a part of the community start editing and drop me a message on the user name Michael Downey. Thanks

== Again ignoring requests on your talk page ==

You are persisting in adding welcome menus to users with no contributions although it has been made clear to you that you shouldn't. If you are going to continue in this way I will block you. [[User:Dougweller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 18:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

== September 2008 ==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome]] to Wikipedia! While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an [[encyclopedia]] and '''not''' a [[WP:NOT#SOCIALNET|social network]]. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia{{#if:|, as you did at [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Off-topic material may be deleted '''at any time'''. This message is not meant to discourage you from editing Wikipedia but rather to remind you that the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-socialnetwork --> ''Please don't constantly add welcome templates to user talkpages without users making contributions, this is an encyclopedia not a Social Network site - keep this in mind. '' [[User:Dark Mage|<strong><font color="Black">Dark</font><font color="Red"> Mage</font></strong>]] 19:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

== question ==

Hello, I'm creating an article about my school, I don't know how to insert the graph at the far right that most articles have how do you do that??


Can you get back to me ASAP

thanks
--[[User:HCSTAACT|HCSTAACT]] ([[User talk:HCSTAACT|talk]]) 20:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
:<div align="right">Do you mean the text should be like this? I'm not sure, so if you could pinpoint the article you are talking about specifically, then I could help you better. To do this, use <code>&lt;div align="right"&gt;Your text here!&lt;/div&gt;</code>. Re your article - try to find more reliable references, such as news sites or important sites. See [[WP:SOURCES]]. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 18:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC)</div>
::''(images only)'' If you mean only images, first [[Special:Upload|upload]] the file and then use <nowiki>[[Image:Your image filename here.png|thumb|Your text here.]]</nowiki>. Replace ''Your image filename here.png'' and ''Your text here.'' before using. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 20:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

== Last warning ==

Hello again. Look, you are exhausting people's patience at a very rapid pace. People have come to your talk page over and over but you haven't seriously engaged in thorough discussions with them. Like I said earlier, the time and effort wasted on fixing problems with your edits is currently greater than the benefit of your good edits. This is not hard for you to change: listen to others, ask questions, read how-to guides. People will be happy to help you become a better editor but you need to let them. You seem genuinely interested in participating positively so why not heed the advice? That being said, this is really the last warning I'm giving you. In particular, I will ask have your AWB access removed if you persist in using it carelessly and I will block you the next time you fail to adjust to criticism. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 22:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
:Then in particular, what do you want me to do? [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 18:55, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
::Dark Mage gives helpful tips below. But the first things you need to do are
:::a) admit mistakes (which you have started to do to a limited extent)
:::b) be responsive and actually discuss problems with whoever points them out to you (you never did respond to the earlier adoption proposal, never sought help regarding newpage patrol, etc)
:::c) show that you adjust when people ask you to
:::d) be much much more careful when getting into areas that involve mass edits. In particular, this is why I think that removing your access to AWB might be the next step. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 01:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
::In regard to your comment, towards Pascal.Tesson have you considered looking through the [[Wikipedia:Department directory]] and do a number of tasks - view my contributions I'm a New page patroller, and a Recent Changes patroller- I also undergo certain updates for templates on other wikimedia sites, have you considered doing something like this or try [[User:Lupin/Anti-vandal_tool|Lupin Anti-vandal Tool]] and read through the instructions. [[User:Dark Mage|<strong><font color="Black">Dark</font><font color="Red"> Mage</font></strong>]] 18:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

:::Thank you for suggesting the [[User:Lupin/Anti-vandal_tool|anti-vandal tool]]! [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 19:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

::::No problem, just make sure you stay way within the policy - if you're unsure if an edit is whether or not vandalism then leave it alone for other editors to view, this is what I sometimes do whether or not I'm unsure about the type of edits which IP user's do. [[User:Dark Mage|<strong><font color="Black">Dark</font><font color="Red"> Mage</font></strong>]] 19:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Extra note about your most recent edits: there is legitimate concern about your use of automated or semi-automated tools. For instance, you're now using anti-vandal scripts but you end up reverting as a "good faith edit" an addition that includes "Jessica Alba is playing the sex addicted slut." [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fantastic_Four:_Rise_of_the_Silver_Surfer&diff=prev&oldid=240280840] Sure, I'm nitpicking. But at this stage, it might be good for you to spend some time away from scripts and do some of that patrolling the old-fashioned way: edit/preview/write-edit-summary/save. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 01:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
:::::Also keep in mind for any signs of vandalism, use [[Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace#Warnings and notices|Warnings and notices]] templates occasionally when you welcome an IP with a standard welcome template like the one which you used on [[User talk:209.30.242.125]] it tends to give that person the wrong expressions and continue to do what they do - if you use the warning template like <nowiki>{{subst:test}}</nowiki> or <nowiki>{{subst:uw-vandalism1}}</nowiki> it'll give them a clear warning, it'll also be easier for Administrators to block that person depending on how many he/she has received view for example [[User talk:205.143.204.198]] that person has a lot of warnings due to the amount of vandalism the person received. Although welcoming users is good but in some situations you might be wise in giving out warning templates or those which I've mentioned rather than given them welcoming templates - users more commonly give out welcome templates when he/she has registered and had done a few edits not when they've first registered as it may drove away that person and we would have lost another contributor which we don't want to loose - also it maybe wise to view [[Wikipedia:Vandalism]] as it gives clear instructions of what to do. [[User:Dark Mage|<strong><font color="Black">Dark</font><font color="Red"> Mage</font></strong>]] 07:11, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

== Welcomeing user box ==

Hello, Thanks for welcoming new users to the wiki. Also thanks for using my welcome box, it is a great complement. I would just want to tell that it still links to my talk page. I will try to fix it, but it is a small detail. Also why did you pick my user welcome box. Happy editing, [[User:cocoaguy|Cocoaguy ここがいい]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/cocoaguy|contribs]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[User talk:cocoaguy|talk]]</span></sup> [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Cocoaguy|Review Me!]] 21:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
:Replied on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACocoaguy&diff=240303222&oldid=238304945 your user talk page]. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 22:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

== Yawn ==
I was adding to what was already a load of bollocks. Remove it all. Lies. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/140.203.12.242|140.203.12.242]] ([[User talk:140.203.12.242|talk]]) 18:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Thank you ==

very much for the barnstar. :) Appreciate it - [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 20:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Why on earth did you revert my comments which (as part of the UK MMA) community were accurate... and leave the bit that someone added at the bottom saying "Shes a cunt and has crabs"? The piece that i added was utterly true and IMO of interest and useful in regards to a page containing information about a person... which is surely the point of wikipedia. I shall re-add my peice... please do not remove it unless you know it to be untrue.

One again you have removed my edit which is CONSTRUCTIVE. Please tell me why this is. What is the point of an editing feature when the over enthuasitic mods remove all edits. If you know my edit to be untrue please let me know why.

== [[Clay Aiken]] ==

My edit to Clay Aiken was a referenced/sourced factual edit. It was not vandalism. If you don't like the content, that's your problem. It's a factual, relevant, encyclopedic piece of information. The source was credible. Please don't continue to alter valid edits. [[User:CouplandForever|CouplandForever]] ([[User talk:CouplandForever|talk]]) 21:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

== Thank you ==

Thank you for the barnstar. I appreciate that. Cheers, [[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="3px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]] ([[User talk:Berean Hunter|<b style="color:#00C">(⊕)</b>]]) 21:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

CoupLand - I too have the same problem with this over-enthusiastic mod... if you read above you can see were apparantly not the only ones

== Blocked ==

I have blocked your account for 12 hours. Given the typical time at which you edit Wikipedia, it's likely that you won't really notice but I feel it's important to have a block logged for future reference. You just cannot continue to be careless in your patrolling. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clay_Aiken&diff=240554071&oldid=240552878 This] did need to be reverted since the source was a bit dubious but a simple Google news search would have made it pretty clear that the editor was in fact acting in good faith. (As it turns out, the story is legit but this is somewhat irrelevant.) The point is that by identifying the edit as vandalism and by failing to contact {{user|CouplandForever}} to discuss the edit, you ended up angering yet another editor. A little earlier you reverted as vandalism edits of {{user|Laudak}} [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breast_fetishism&diff=240534948&oldid=240534767]. I'll grant you that his edits were questionable but they most certainly were not vandalism. Perhaps what threw you off is that in reverting himself he ended up accidentally restoring [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breast_fetishism&diff=240523423&oldid=239325068 this obvious vandal edit]. A more careful look at the history would have made that clear and it would also have led you to notice that Laudak has been editing Wikipedia for over a year without any incident and has contributed to that article before. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 02:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

== NEVER Machine translation ==

[[Image:Information icon.svg|left|30px]] Thanks for joining ja.wp. Please never use machine translation since machine translation technologies which involve Japanese language are relatively very poor and in the most case they do not generate sentences we can understand, or only generate totally corrupted sentences. Additionally, using the result of machine translator can be copyvio depends on the translator you used. Because of these, we do not welcome posting articles created by machine-translator. If you need help, you can ask [[:ja:Wikipedia:Help for Non-Japanese Speakers|here]].--[[User:Peccafly|Peccafly]]<small>-[[:ja:利用者‐会話:Peccafly|talk]]-[[Special:Contributions/Peccafly|hist]]</small> 05:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

==[[Andrew McMaster]]==
If you're going to place afds on athletes you should learn the basic standards. See the discussion there, by others--you nominated an Olympic competitor from the 70s for lack of ghits--and the nature of his notability was clear on the face of the article. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 08:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

==Suggestion==
Hi I saw your AfD mentioned above and looked on this page and then at your contribs. I have a suggestion which might improve your edits/your relationship with other editors a lot. Don't use Twinkle. I've never used it or any speeding-up tool;

* a) because I don't have a technical mind enough to even know how to use it, and
* b) because I get things wrong often enough without increasing the speed of my wrong edits.:)

Hope this helps, [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 10:58, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

: I go further and strongly suggest you simply observe for a while, because although I believe you are not intending to cause problems, you are. Read the policy, too. Right now, you're a bit of a loose canon, and sooner or later an admin will lose patience. [[User:Ros0709|Ros0709]] ([[User talk:Ros0709|talk]]) 19:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

==Thanks==
Thanks for your welcome! -[[User:Dicting|Dicting]] ([[User talk:Dicting|talk]]) 13:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

== [[Ara Babajian]] ==

I've undone your Twinkle-assisted reversion on [[Ara Babajian]]. In this case, [[User:Juggalo541|Juggalo541]] was not vandalizing the page; Babajian is actually in a band named [[Star Fucking Hipsters]]. - [[User:Jredmond|Jredmond]] ([[User talk:Jredmond|talk]]) 18:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

==Your edit to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stanhope_Road_School&diff=241201768&oldid=241196464 Stanhope_Road_School]==

(If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Stanhope Road School, you will be blocked from editing) Thanks Tohd8BohaithuGh1 for your opinion, I will take it as that only. I see that we both need to learn some points here. You as an expert idenifiying vandalism & me as an amatuer updating information to an article I originally created with Wikipedia.
:Tohd8BohaithuGh1, what part of "use vandalism warnings with care" do you not understand? I'm asking you again: stop using Twinkle and the like. Take time to do patrolling the old-fashioned way, it will force you to use more precise rationales in your edit summaries and you'll learn how to do things right. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 22:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
::[[WP:TW|Twinkle]] is much faster and easier when reverting to more than one revision back. Plus if you do it the regular way, someone else has probably already reverted the vandalism. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 22:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
:::Just curious, but how is it bad if somebody else has alredy reverted the vandalism? - [[User:Jredmond|Jredmond]] ([[User talk:Jredmond|talk]]) 22:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
::::Because they leave you checking every page behind them at the recent changes page, and getting none done yourself. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 23:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
:::::I'm taking this to AN/I again and recommend you be blocked for disruption. This has gone on too long and you don't seem to really care about working with anyone here as you just continue to make problem edits over and over.--[[User:Crossmr|Crossmr]] ([[User talk:Crossmr|talk]]) 01:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

== Plenty of things on the Wiki to work on ==

Hi Tohd, I notice you may be running into a problem because of your vandalism fighting. While fighting vandalism is good, it may be a good idea to learn some of the other Wiki skills and become involved in those activities while letting this one relax for a bit. Have you got any articles in your sandbox? With all of your energy and time that you have been investing in combating vandalism, you could probably roll out some nice articles. We also need people to look up citations or more correctly, to find citations. It would be good to add balance to your time on Wikipedia. You will have a better editing experience. I would appreciate any article you decide to write and would be happy to edit it for you. Cheers,[[User:Berean Hunter|<font face="High Tower Text" size="3px"><b style="color:#00C">⋙–Ber</b><b style="color:#66f">ean–Hun</b><b style="color:#00C">ter—►</b></font>]] ([[User talk:Berean Hunter|<b style="color:#00C">(⊕)</b>]]) 02:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

Hi. I have blocked your account for 24 hours. Your response to the concerns brought by myself and Jredmond clearly indicate that you either don't understand what's problematic with your edits or don't care. I can't let this continue forever: if you can't do recent changes patrol responsibly then do something else. Many editors, myself included, have been ''very'' patient and have offered both advice and counsel but obviously we're not getting through. I do hope that you will continue participating in the project but I will not hesitate to block you again for a longer period if you can't address these problems. [[User:Pascal.Tesson|Pascal.Tesson]] ([[User talk:Pascal.Tesson|talk]]) 03:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

==Username==
Hi Tohd, I was wondering about your username, does it mean something? It just makes me so curious:) [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 12:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
:Not really, it's just a mixed up version of "Todd" and a couple of random characters to make it unique. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 13:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

==Adoption==
It would be an honour to adopt you :) Please consider taking all the tool thingies off your account, and have this lovely box instead, which you may put on your userpage: {{adoptee|Sticky Parkin}} . P.S. You just did some good [[WP:WikiGnome]] type edits.:) [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 17:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

==Todd==
[[Image:Minor Barnstar.png|thumb|150px|right|Hey Todd I just wanted to say how pleased I am with what I see as an improvement in your edits today. I hope to see many more good edits:) [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 00:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)]]

Hey Todd- are you ok? Please come back and edit.:) [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 17:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

== Sorry ==

Surry ebuoot zee fundeleesm pleese-a forgive-a me-a i ves just testing [[User:CoolSolidWater|CoolSolidWater]] ([[User talk:CoolSolidWater|talk]]) 21:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

==[[Academy of Lille]]==
If you are using a machine translator you may need to improve the grammar etc such as remove any extra 'the's before posting it, or making the order of words seem more natural. You can clean up machine-translated or even rough self-translated articles or improve on them a bit before posting them. You could simply do that in your user space, or in the edit window before posting. [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 14:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

== Re:Barnstar ==

Thanks a lot for your appreciation!! <sup>''[[Special:Contributions/LeaveSleaves|Leave]]''</sup>'''[[User:LeaveSleaves|Sleaves]]'''&nbsp;<sub>''[[User talk:LeaveSleaves|talk]]''</sub> 19:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

== hey!!!!!!!! ==

GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU COMMIE BITCH!<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:207.157.35.64|207.157.35.64]] ([[User talk:207.157.35.64|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/207.157.35.64|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
::Hi Tohd, if I happen to see anything like the above on your page in future, would you like me to revert it? Or do you like to keep it, (some people find it a sign they are doing some good vandal reversion work.:) ) [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 23:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
:::Not really, though I do find the comment offensive, [[WP:CENSOR|despite the fact that Wikipedia is not censored]]. I could consider hiding it was a offensive comment navbox though. Thanks for asking. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 00:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
::::Wikipedia is not censored [[WP:NPA|does not mean personal attacks are ok]]. :) Although we don't own our talk pages, we are largely (within the limits of the spirit of free editing and collaboration; -wiki) given dispensation over what is on our own talk page and within certain limits can remove anything on it we are uncomfortable with, providing you have respect for what other users are trying to say when they message you. But vandalism and stuff like this can be removed on sight. [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 02:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

==Suggestion==
Hi. Thanks for the barnstar :)

I suggest you use Huggle (the latest working version is 0.7.12) over Twinkle, as it is somewhat faster for vandalism :D
Otherwise, Twinkle is very nice for CSD and such.
[[User:DavidWS|DavidWS]] ([[User talk:DavidWS|talk]]) 19:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
:Thank you for the suggestion. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 19:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
::I would advise against you using huggle at this point, your use of automated tools was what was causing problems in the past. At the very least '''Slow down''' as you seem to making a lot of reverts of good faith edits. -[[User:Optigan13|Optigan13]] ([[User talk:Optigan13|talk]]) 23:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

== help! ==

Can you just tell me how I can change the name of my entry from "Roger howard" to "Roger Howard"- tiny difference but seems impossible to do!! many thanks R <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Roger TT Howard|Roger TT Howard]] ([[User talk:Roger TT Howard|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Roger TT Howard|contribs]]) 19:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roger_Howard&diff=244433113&oldid=244431313 I've done that for you]. However, please [[WP:CITE|cite your sources]] when you write an article. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 19:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

== vandalism! ==

What are you going on about?
Cheers
[[User:Speedo89|Speedo89]] ([[User talk:Speedo89|talk]]) 19:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
:The edit that I reverted was vandalism because you [[WP:Vandalism#Types of vandalism|deleted content]] from Wikipedia. Please do not do this again in the future or you may [[WP:BLOCK|find your editing privileges taken away]]. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 20:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

== state of wu ==

i was just adding the former state template. theres no controversy as to whether it was a state or not.[[Special:Contributions/162.84.164.178|162.84.164.178]] ([[User talk:162.84.164.178|talk]]) 20:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
:There is not, but you did delete information. For example, before your edit, the year_start looked like "|year_start = 221 BCE ", but after your edit it looked like "|year_start = BCE ". [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 20:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

oh because i got the wwrong date, so i was going to put in the correct one.[[Special:Contributions/162.84.164.178|162.84.164.178]] ([[User talk:162.84.164.178|talk]]) 20:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

== Bowie Song ==

Hi!
Did you undo my change to the Bombers page? My edit doesn't even seem to show in the history page anymore.
I think it is a great idea to include lyrics on song pages. Collect all information in one place. Is that not the idea of wikipedia? Sure it would be great if the lyrics were not inline but in a lyrics box on the right. It would also be great if they could be inserted using a custom html tag such as <lyrics></lyrics> to avoid inserting the manual line breaks.
I wonder who chooses what is considered constructive and what isn't? Are there democratically coordinated guidelines organized by information type or do administrators choose at their own discretion?
I love Wikipedia! It's a great project!
All the best,
Gerald <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.179.136.92|85.179.136.92]] ([[User talk:85.179.136.92|talk]]) 21:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Reverted changes ==

The edit I made was not vandalism. I fixed the reference link and title. Click on the reference link. You will find that it is broken. The correct address is http://wcbstv.com/watercooler/Bratz.Jade.Expletives.2.240942.html

The correct title is "When Good Dolls Go Bad For Christmas" not the truncated "When Good Dolls Go Bad".<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:130.126.103.183|130.126.103.183]] ([[User talk:130.126.103.183|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/130.126.103.183|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

:Okay, sorry for the inconvenience - I have reverted it back to your version. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 22:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

::Thank you.<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:130.126.103.183|130.126.103.183]] ([[User talk:130.126.103.183|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/130.126.103.183|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

== Concerning Mixed Martial Arts Unified Rules ==

Ammendments to the unified rules of mixed martial arts now allow elbow strikes in all forms. The ABC (Boxing commisions)had a meeting to discuss the unified rules and made this ammendment, along with the "mohawk" definition of striking the back of the head and others. If you could change the page to reflect this (or allow me too) it would be greatly appreciated. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.85.172.76|91.85.172.76]] ([[User talk:91.85.172.76|talk]]) 22:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Hi. The link on [[The New Cars]] page to "[[Not Tonight]]" goes to a song by a completely different artist. Ergo, it's misinformation, and shouldn't be linked. You can look if you like. Also, there's really no reason to have a header for a non-existant section, i.e. references, as there aren't any references in the article. This is explained in the edit summary I left after editing, as that's what the edit summary is for. I have restored these cleanups. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/71.164.116.18|71.164.116.18]] ([[User talk:71.164.116.18|talk]]) 23:00, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

== Reverted changes ==

On Mars and life in it, I did as requested by the "update" label, since I chance to work in this field. I wish not to start any WoE, so please don't revert it again in block and, if you think there is any debatble point, kindly say it here. No hurry. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/201.250.52.128|201.250.52.128]] ([[User talk:201.250.52.128|talk]]) 23:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Agreed. Tohd8BohaithuGh1, your revert was abusive as 201.250.52.128's edit was clearly constructive, as was Mr2323's to [[Reyli]]. Please don't be too trigger happy with the undo button and take the time to explain in the history what the editor made wrong to your opinion. Be conscious that such a reckless behaviour may discourage new good-faith editors. — [[User:Xhienne|Xavier]], 23:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

== I believe you made mistake, ==

You reverted my edit to the [[Reyli]] page, citing it as unconstructive. I believe this was a mistake on your part, please review it and or be more careuful. I added an image to article showing the person discussed. Please remember, [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]], and check edits more carefully before reverting. -- [[User:Mr2323|Mr2323]] ([[User talk:Mr2323|talk]]) 23:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

== edit: [[The elements of style]] ==

I modified the links, one is broken and the other two were reviewed, so I modified the last date of access. Reverted to modified links. [[User:Nando.sm|Nando.sm]] ([[User talk:Nando.sm|talk]]) 23:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

==Slow down==
Todd, you were doing amazing for a while just using twinkle, now you've started with huggle you're starting to make mistakes again. You were doing so well! Slow down. [[WP:TIND|There is no deadline]]. Remember that Huggle is mainly designed to revert vandalism rather than making changes to articles, as far as I can tell. Work with your fellow editors to improve articles. You really need to concentrate on working with others, people have already paid you compliments for things and thanked you for things on your page, so I know you have it in you. [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 23:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
:Okay, so you are saying I should only revert the '''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Waldo&diff=prev&oldid=244663730 really obvious vandalism]'''? [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 23:41, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
::Who says you need to spend all your time reverting vandalism and working with automated tools? You don't need to worry about edits like that, as a bot will pick it up and revert it. Spend some more time working on [[WP:Articles for creation]], or spend some time looking at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:NewPages&dir=prev&hidepatrolled=1 oldest unpatrolled pages] and see if they could use some cleanup/improvement, or look at stuff in the [[WP:Backlog]] for things to do. Don't focus on just reverting vandalism, Wikipedia still has a lot of opportunities for things you can do which do not require automated tools. Focus on building, expanding, and improving the encyclopedia instead of just reverting and maintaining it as is. -[[User:Optigan13|Optigan13]] ([[User talk:Optigan13|talk]]) 00:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
:::I would only use huggle for that sort of thing rather than using it for anything else. I think [[Wikipedia:Huggle/Manual]] only mentions vandalism. Basically, use your judgement and [[WP:AGF|assume most other editors are trying to improve articles]]. For instance, if they remove a line of text, think why they might have removed it, or maybe even ask them. If they remove a large section of the page, that's usually a bit different.:) Even then, check they aren't removing vandalism or poor quality text themselves or removing slander. Having said that, I'm not an expert with huggle. Basically, just remember most of the edits are made by human beings and think how you feel yourself if someone reverts you or something or calls you 'unconstructive' or a vandal. If you disagree with someone's edit, have a word with them rather than templating them, or discuss it on the article's talk page. You were doing ok with Twinkle- ease into huggle slowly if you really feel you have to use it, but personally I'd do things by hand since you've been in trouble for using the tools, unless I was really confident a particular tool-using edit would be right. Optigan has a point too but if you want to focus on this area, which can be 'fun' sometimes, use your human judgement and err on the side of caution. [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 00:28, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Smiley icon.svg|right|100px]]
::::Great edits Tohd:) Looking forward to more.:) [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 01:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
:::::However, when someone removed a duplicate quote, making it clear that that is what they were doing, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foundation_for_Ancient_Research_and_Mormon_Studies&diff=prev&oldid=244809708] Tohd just reverted them givng no reason. They've redone their edit now, please leave it alone. Hell, he's given them a warning also. Tohd, please go to the user's page and remove your warning. [[User:Dougweller|Doug Weller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 17:52, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
::::::Don't embarrass me now Tohd.:) If someone explains what they're doing and why they're doing in an edit summary, it's best to assume they're a good-faith editor making a reasoned edit and not a vandal- hey it's best to assume that about everyone within reason.:) [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 18:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

== Dang! ==

You are really good. You've just beaten me to about 30 articles I was going to revert. Well done, you are so fast! '''[[User:Jock Boy|<span style="font family:Arial;color:brown">Jock</span>]] [[User talk:Jock Boy|<span style="font family:Arial;color:red">Boy</span>]]''' 18:03, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
:What do you use for reverting? If you are experienced enough, you should try [[WP:TW|Twinkle]] or [[WP:HG|Huggle]] instead of [[WP:UNDO|undo]]. [[User:Tohd8BohaithuGh1|Tohd8BohaithuGh1]] ([[User talk:Tohd8BohaithuGh1#top|talk]]) 18:04, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

==What the?==
{{stop}}
I'm not an expert on this subject [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Run-flat_tire&diff=prev&oldid=244819172] but seems you're reverting to poorer versions or something. I can only advise you to stop, you are going to end up blocked again if you carry on, many pairs of eyes are rightfully watching you.:) [[User:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Sticky</font></b>]] [[User talk:Sticky Parkin|<b><font color="#FF8C00">Parkin</font></b>]] 18:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:52, 12 October 2008

Great Ming
大明
1368–1644
Ming China under the Yongle Emperor
Ming China under the Yongle Emperor
CapitalNanjing
(1368-1421)
Beijing
(1421-1644)
Common languagesChinese
Religion
Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism, Chinese folk religion
GovernmentMonarchy
Emperor 
• 1368-1398
Hongwu Emperor
• 1627-1644
Chongzhen Emperor
Chancellor 
• 1368–1398
Liu Ji
• –
Yan Song
• 
Tan Lun
• –
Zhang Juzheng
• 
Zhu Guozhen
History 
• Established in Nanjing
January 23 1368 1368
• Fall of Beijing
June 6 1644 1644
• End of the Southern Ming
April, 1662
Population
• 1393
72,700,000
• 1400
65,000,000¹
• 1600
150,000,000¹
• 1644
100,000,000
CurrencyChinese cash, Chinese coin, Paper currency (later abolished)
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Yuan Dynasty
Shun Dynasty
Qing Dynasty
Remnants of the Ming Dynasty ruled southern China until 1662, a dynastic period which is known as the Southern Ming.
¹ The numbers are based on estimates made by C.J. Peers in Late Imperial Chinese Armies: 1520-1840

The Ming Dynasty (Chinese: 明朝; pinyin: Míng Cháo), or Empire of the Great Ming (simplified Chinese: 大明国; traditional Chinese: 大明國; pinyin: Dà Míng Guó), was the ruling dynasty of China from 1368 to 1644, following the collapse of the Mongol-led Yuan Dynasty. The Ming was the last dynasty in China ruled by ethnic Hans (the main Chinese ethnic group), before falling to the rebellion led in part by Li Zicheng (李自成) and soon after replaced by the Manchu-led Qing Dynasty. Although the Ming capital Beijing fell in 1644, remnants of the Ming throne and power (collectively called the Southern Ming) survived until 1662.

Ming rule saw the construction of a vast navy and a standing army of one million troops.[1] Although private maritime trade and official tribute missions from China had taken place in previous dynasties, the tributary fleet under the Muslim eunuch admiral Zheng He in the 15th century surpassed all others in sheer size. There were enormous projects of construction, including the restoration of the Grand Canal and the Great Wall and the establishment of the Forbidden City in Beijing during the first quarter of the 15th century. Estimates for the population in the late Ming era vary from 160 to 200 million.[2] The University of Calgary states that "the Ming created one of the greatest eras of orderly government and social stability in human history."[3]

Emperor Hongwu (r. 1368–1398) attempted to create a society of self-sufficient rural communities in a rigid, immobile system that would have no need to engage with the commercial life and trade of urban centers. His rebuilding of China's agricultural base and strengthening of communication routes through the militarized courier system had the unintended effect of creating a vast agricultural surplus that could be sold at burgeoning markets located along courier routes. Rural culture and commerce became influenced by urban trends. The upper echelons of society embodied in the scholarly gentry class were also affected by this new consumption-based culture. In a departure from tradition, merchant families began to produce examination candidates to become scholar-officials and adopted cultural traits and practices typical of the gentry class. Parallel to this trend involving social class and commercial consumption were changes in social and political philosophy, bureaucracy and governmental institution, and even arts and literature.

By the 16th century the Ming economy was stimulated by maritime trade with the Portuguese, Spanish, and Dutch. China became involved in a new global trade of goods, plants, animals, and food crops known as the Columbian Exchange. Trade with European powers and the Japanese brought in massive amounts of silver, which then replaced copper and paper banknotes as the common medium of exchange in China. During the last decades of the Ming the flow of silver into China was greatly diminished, thereby undermining state revenues and indeed the entire Ming economy. This damage to the economy was compounded by the effects on agriculture of the incipient Little Ice Age, natural calamities, crop failure, and sudden epidemics. The ensuing breakdown of authority and people's livelihoods allowed rebel leaders such as Li Zicheng to challenge Ming authority.

howdy are how you guys doing?

History

Founding

Revolt and rebel rivalry

The Mongol-led Yuan Dynasty (1271–1368) ruled before the establishment of the Ming Dynasty. Alongside institutionalized ethnic discrimination against Han Chinese that stirred resentment and rebellion, other explanations for the Yuan's demise included overtaxing areas hard-hit by crop failure, inflation, and massive flooding of the Yellow River as a result of the abandonment of irrigation projects.[4] Consequently, agriculture and the economy were in shambles and rebellion broke out among the hundreds of thousands of peasants called upon to work on repairing the dykes of the Yellow River.[4]

A cannon from the Huolongjing, compiled by Jiao Yu and Liu Ji before the latter's death in 1375.

A number of Han Chinese groups revolted, including the Red Turbans (红巾军) in 1351. The Red Turbans were affiliated with the White Lotus, a Buddhist secret society. Zhu Yuanzhang was a penniless peasant and Buddhist monk who joined the Red Turbans in 1352, but soon gained a reputation after marrying the foster daughter of a rebel commander.[5] In 1356 Zhu's rebel force captured the city of Nanjing,[6] which he would later establish as the capital of the Ming Dynasty.

Zhu Yuanzhang (朱元璋) cemented his power in the south by eliminating his arch rival and rebel leader Chen Youliang (陈友谅) in the Battle of Lake Poyang (鄱阳湖水战) in 1363. After the dynastic head of the Red Turbans suspiciously died in 1367 while hosted as a guest of Zhu, the latter made his imperial ambitions known by sending an army toward the Yuan capital in 1368.[7] The last Yuan emperor fled north to Shangdu and Zhu declared the founding of the Ming Dynasty after razing the Yuan palaces of Khanbaliq (Beijing) to the ground.[7]

Instead of the traditional way of naming a dynasty after the first ruler's home district, Zhu's choice of 'Ming' or 'Brilliant' for his dynasty followed a Mongol precedent of an uplifting title.[6] Zhu Yuanzhang also took Hongwu, or 'Vastly Martial' as his reign title. Although the White Lotus had fomented his rise to power, Hongwu later denied that he had ever been a member of their organization and suppressed the religious movement after he became emperor.[6][8]

Reign of the Hongwu Emperor

Portrait of the Hongwu Emperor (r. 1368 - 1398)

Hongwu immediately set to rebuilding state infrastructure. He built a 48 km (30 mile) long wall around Nanjing, as well as new palaces and government halls.[7] The Mingshi 明史 states that as early as 1364 Zhu Yuanzhang had begun drafting a new Confucian law code known as the Daming Lu, which was completed by 1397 and repeated certain clauses found in the old Tang Code of 653.[9] Hongwu organized a military system known as the weisuo, which was similar to the fubing system of the Tang Dynasty (618–907). The goal was to have soldiers become self-reliant farmers in order to sustain themselves while not fighting or training.[10] The system of the self-sufficient agricultural soldier, however, was largely a farce; infrequent rations and awards were not enough to sustain the troops, and many deserted their ranks if they weren't located in the heavily-supplied frontier.[11]

Although a Confucian, Hongwu had a deep distrust for the scholar-officials of the gentry class and was not afraid to have them beaten in court for offenses.[12] He halted the civil service examinations in 1373 after complaining that the 120 scholar-officials who obtained a jinshi degree were incompetent ministers.[13][14] After the examinations were reinstated in 1384,[14] he had the chief examiner executed after it was discovered that he allowed only candidates from the south to be granted jinshi degrees.[13]

In 1380 Hongwu had the Chancellor Hu Weiyong (左丞相 胡惟庸) executed upon suspicion of a conspiracy plot to overthrow him; after that Hongwu abolished the Chinese Chancellery and assumed this role as chief executive and emperor.[15][16] With a growing suspicion of his ministers and subjects, Hongwu established the Jinyi Wei (锦衣卫), a network of secret police drawn from his own palace guard. They were partly responsible for the loss of 100,000 lives in several purges over three decades of his rule.[15][17]

South-Western Frontier

The old south gate of Dali, Yunnan, which was established as a Chinese-style city in 1382 shortly after the Ming conquest of the region.

In 1381, the Ming Dynasty annexed the areas of the southwest that had once been part of the Kingdom of Dali. By the end of the 14th century, some 200,000 military colonists settled some 2,000,000 mu (350,000 acres) of land in what is now Yunnan and Guizhou.[18] Roughly half a million more Chinese settlers came in later periods; these migrations caused a major shift in the ethnic make-up of the region, since more than half of the roughly 3,000,000 inhabitants at the beginning of the Ming Dynasty were non-Han peoples.[18] In this region, the Ming government adopted a policy of dual administration. Areas with majority ethnic Chinese were governed according to Ming laws and policies; areas where native tribal groups dominated had their own set of laws while tribal chiefs promised to maintain order and send tribute to the Ming court in return for needed goods.[18] From 1464 to 1466 the Miao and Yao people revolted against what they saw as oppressive government rule; in response, the Ming government sent an army of 30,000 troops (including 1,000 Mongols) to join the 160,000 local troops of Guangxi and crushed the rebellion.[19] After the scholar and philosopher Wang Yangming (1472–1529) suppressed another rebellion in the region, he advocated joint administration of Chinese and local ethnic groups in order to bring about sinification in the local peoples' culture.[19]

Relations with Tibet

A 17th century Tibetan thangka of Guhyasamaja Akshobhyavajra; the Ming Dynasty court gathered various tribute items which were native products of Tibet (such as thangkas),[20] and in return granted Tibetan tribute-bearers with gifts.[21]

Scholarship outside China generally regards Tibet as having been independent during the Ming Dynasty, whereas historians in China today take an opposing point of view. The Mingshi— the official history of the Ming Dynasty compiled later by the Qing Dynasty in 1739—states that the Ming established itinerant commanderies overseeing Tibetan administration while also renewing titles of ex-Yuan Dynasty officials from Tibet and conferring new princely titles on leaders of Tibet's Buddhist sects.[22] However, Turrell V. Wylie states that censorship in the Mingshi in favor of bolstering the Ming emperor's prestige and reputation at all costs obfuscates the nuanced history of Sino-Tibetan relations during the Ming era.[23] Modern scholars still debate on whether or not the Ming Dynasty really had sovereignty over Tibet at all, as some believe it was a relationship of loose suzerainty which was largely cut off when the Jiajing Emperor (r. 1521–1567) persecuted Buddhism in favor of Daoism at court.[24][25][23] Helmut Hoffman states that the Ming upheld the facade of rule over Tibet through periodic missions of "tribute emissaries" to the Ming court and by granting nominal titles to ruling lamas, but did not actually interfere in Tibetan governance.[26] Wang Jiawei and Nyima Gyaincain disagree, stating that Ming China had sovereignty over Tibetans who did not inherit Ming titles, but were forced to travel to Beijing to renew them.[27] Melvyn C. Goldstein writes that the Ming had no real administrative authority over Tibet since the various titles given to Tibetan leaders already in power did not confer authority as earlier Mongol Yuan titles had; according to him, "the Ming emperors merely recognized political reality."[28] Some scholars argue that the significant religious nature of the relationship of the Ming court with Tibetan lamas is underrepresented in modern scholarship.[29][30] Others underscore the commercial aspect of the relationship, noting the Ming Dynasty's insufficient amount of horses and the need to maintain the tea-horse trade with Tibet.[31][32][33][34][35] Scholars also debate on how much power and influence—if any—the Ming Dynasty court had over the de facto successive ruling families of Tibet, the Phagmodru (1354–1436), Rinbung (1436–1565), and Tsangpa (1565–1642).[36][37][38][39][40][41]

The Ming initiated sporadic armed intervention in Tibet during the 14th century, while at times the Tibetans also used successful armed resistance against Ming forays.[42][43] Patricia Ebrey, Thomas Laird, Wang Jiawei, and Nyima Gyaincain all point out that the Ming Dynasty did not garrison permanent troops in Tibet,[44][39][45] unlike the former Mongol Yuan Dynasty.[39] The Wanli Emperor (r. 1572–1620) made attempts to reestablish Sino-Tibetan relations in the wake of a Mongol-Tibetan alliance initiated in 1578, the latter of which affected the foreign policy of the subsequent Manchu Qing Dynasty (1644–1912) of China in their support for the Dalai Lama of the Yellow Hat sect. [23][46][47][48][49] By the late 16th century, the Mongols proved to be successful armed protectors of the Yellow Hat Dalai Lama after their increasing presence in the Amdo region, culminating in Güshi Khan's (1582–1655) conquest of Tibet in 1642.[23][50][51][52]

Reversal of Hongwu's policies

Imposing standards and relocations

File:Nj02.jpg
The City Wall of Nanjing

According to historian Timothy Brook, the Hongwu Emperor attempted to immobilize society by creating rigid, state-regulated boundaries between villages and larger townships, discouraging trade and travel in society not permitted by the government.[53] Hongwu attempted to instill austere values by imposing uniform dress codes, standard methods of speech, and standard style of writing classical prose that did not flaunt the skills of the highly educated.[54] His suspicion for the educated elite matched his disdain for the commercial elites, imposing inordinately high taxes upon the hotbed of powerful merchant families in the region of Suzhou in Jiangsu.[13] He also forcibly moved thousands of wealthy families from the southeast and resettled them around Nanjing in the Jiangnan region, forbidding them to move once they were settled.[13][55] To keep track of the merchants' activities, Hongwu forced them to register all of their goods once a month.[56] One of his main goals as ruler was to permanently curb the influence of merchants and landlords, yet several of his policies would eventually encourage them to amass more wealth.

Hongwu's oppressive system of massive relocation and the desire to escape his harsh taxes encouraged many to become itinerant retailers, peddlers, or migrant workers finding tenant landowners who would rent them space to farm and labor on.[57] By the mid Ming era, emperors had abandoned Hongwu's relocation scheme and instead trusted local officials to document migrant workers in order to bring in more revenue.[58] An elite of wealthy landlords and merchants reigning over land tenants, wage laborers, domestic servants, and migrant workers was hardly the vision of Hongwu's: strict adherence to the hierarchic status system of the four occupations.[59]

Self-sufficient agriculture, surplus, and urban trends

A porcelain vase from the Jiajing reign period (1521–1567); Chinese culture became a consumptionary-based culture by the late Ming. Social elites were expected to know the difference between shoddy crafts and fine wares, and even which type of plants were to be appreciated as rare and exotic enough for one's garden.[60]

Hongwu revived the agricultural sector to create self-sufficient communities that would not rely on commerce, which he assumed would remain only in urban areas.[61] Yet the surplus created from this revival encouraged rural farmers to make profits by first selling their goods at thoroughfares; by the mid Ming era they began selling their goods in regional urban markets.[62] As the countryside and urban areas became more connected through commerce, households in rural areas began taking on traditionally urban specializations, such as production of silk and cotton textiles.[63] By the late Ming there was a growing concern amongst conservative Confucians that the metaphorical delicate fabric holding together the communal social order was being undermined by country rustics accepting every manner of urban life and decadence.[64]

The rural farmer was not the only social group affected by growing commercialization of Chinese society; it also heavily influenced the landholding gentry that traditionally produced scholar-officials for civil service. The scholar-officials were traditionally held as frugal individuals who deterred themselves from arrogance in the wealth garnered from a prestigious career; they were known even to walk from their country homes into the city where they were employed.[65] By the time of the Zhengde Emperor (1505–1521), officials chose to be hauled around in luxurious sedan chairs and began purchasing lavish homes in affluent urban neighborhoods instead of living in the countryside.[65] By the late Ming era, gaining wealth became the prime indicator of social prestige, even more so than gaining a scholarly degree.[66]

Fusion of the merchant and gentry classes

File:旋转 DSCN1782.JPG
Cishou Temple Pagoda, built in 1576; the Chinese believed that building pagodas on certain sites according to geomantic principles brought about auspicious events;[67] merchant-funding for such projects was needed by the late Ming period.

In the first half of the Ming era, scholar-officials would rarely mention the contribution of merchants in society while writing their local gazetteer;[68] officials were certainly capable of funding their own public works projects, a symbol of their virtuous political leadership.[69] However, by the second half of the Ming era it became common for officials to solicit money from merchants in order to fund their various projects, such as building bridges or establishing new schools of Confucian learning for the betterment of the gentry.[70] From that point on the gazetteers began mentioning merchants and often in high esteem, since the wealth produced by their economic activity produced resources for the state as well as increased production of books needed for the education of the gentry.[71] Merchants began taking on the highly-cultured, connoisseur's attitude and cultivated traits of the gentry class, blurring the lines between merchant and gentry and paving the way for merchant families to produce scholar-officials.[72] The roots of this social transformation and class indistinction could be found in the Song Dynasty (960–1279),[73] but it became much more pronounced in the Ming. Writings of family instructions for lineage groups in the late Ming period display the fact that one no longer inherited his position in the categorization of the four occupations (in descending order): gentry, farmers, artisans, and merchants.[74]

Courier network and commercial growth

Hongwu believed that only government couriers and lowly retail merchants should have the right to travel far outside their home town.[56] Despite his efforts to impose this view, his building of an efficient communication network for his military and official personnel strengthened and fomented the rise of a potential commercial network running parallel to the courier network.[75] The shipwrecked Korean Choe Bu (1454–1504) remarked in 1488 how the locals along the eastern coasts of China did not know the exact distances between certain places, which was virtually exclusive knowledge of the Ministry of War and courier agents.[76] This was in stark contrast to the late Ming period, when merchants not only traveled further distances to convey their goods, but also bribed courier officials to use their routes and even had printed geographical guides of commercial routes that imitated the couriers' maps.[77]

Merchants, an open market, and silver

The only surviving piece of furniture from the "Orchard Factory" (the Imperial Lacquer Workshop) set up in Beijing in the early Ming Dynasty. Decorated in dragons and phoenixes, it was made during the Xuande era (1426–1435). The imperial workshops in the Ming era were overseen by a eunuch bureau.[78] (See closeup for detail)

The scholar-officials' dependence upon the economic activities of the merchants became more than a trend when it was semi-institutionalized by the state in the mid Ming era. Qiu Jun (1420–1495), a scholar-official from Hainan, argued that the state should only mitigate market affairs during times of pending crisis and that merchants were the best gauge in determining the strength of a nation's riches in resources.[79] The government followed this guideline by the mid Ming era when it allowed merchants to take over the state monopoly of salt production. This was a gradual process where the state supplied northern frontier armies with enough grain by granting merchants licenses to trade in salt in return for their shipping services.[80] The state realized that merchants could buy salt licenses with silver and in turn boost state revenues to the point where buying grain was not an issue.[80] The governments of both Hongwu and Zhengtong (r. 1435–1449) attempted to cut the flow of silver into the economy in favor of paper currency, yet mining the precious metal simply became a lucrative illegal pursuit practiced by many.[81] Hongwu was unaware of economic inflation even as he continued to hand out multitudes of banknotes as awards; by 1425, paper currency was worth only 0.025% to 0.014% its original value in the 14th century.[11] The value of standard copper coinage dropped significantly as well due to counterfeit minting; by the 16th century, new maritime trade contacts with Europe provided massive amounts of imported silver, which increasingly became the common medium of exchange.[82] As far back as 1436, the southern grain tax had been partially commuted to payments in silver.[83] In 1581 the Single Whip Reform installed by Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng (1525–1582) finally assessed taxes on the amount of land paid entirely in silver.[84]

Reign of the Yongle Emperor

Portrait of the Yongle Emperor (r. 1402–1424).

Rise to power

Hongwu's grandson Zhu Yunwen assumed the throne as the Jianwen Emperor (1398–1402) after Hongwu's death in 1398. In a prelude to a three-year-long civil war beginning in 1399,[85] Jianwen became engaged in a political showdown with his uncle Zhu Di, the Prince of Yan. Jianwen was aware of the ambitions of his princely uncles, establishing measures to limit their authority. The militant Zhu Di, given charge over the area encompassing Beijing to watch the Mongols on the frontier, was the most feared of these princes. After Jianwen arrested many of Zhu Di's associates, Zhu Di plotted a rebellion. Under the guise of rescuing the young Jianwen from corrupting officials, Zhu Di personally led forces in the revolt; the palace in Nanjing was burned to the ground, along with Zhu Di's nephew Jianwen, his wife, mother, and courtiers. Zhu Di assumed the throne as the Yongle Emperor (1402–1424); his reign is universally viewed by scholars as a "second founding" of the Ming Dynasty since he reversed many of his father's policies.[86]

New capital and a restored canal

Yongle demoted Nanjing to a secondary capital and in 1403 announced the new capital of China was to be at his power base in Beijing. Construction of a new city there lasted from 1407 to 1420, employing hundreds of thousands of workers daily.[87] At the center was the political node of the Imperial City, and at the center of this was the Forbidden City, the palatial residence of the emperor and his family. By 1553, the Outer City was added to the south, which brought the overall size of Beijing to 4 by 4½ miles.[88]

The Ming Dynasty Tombs located 50 km (31 miles) north of Beijing; the site was chosen by Yongle.

After laying dormant and dilapidated for decades, the Grand Canal was restored under Yongle from 1411–1415. The impetus for restoring the canal was to solve the perennial problem of shipping grain north to Beijing. Shipping the annual 4,000,000 shi (one shi is equal to 107 liters) was made difficult with an inefficient system of shipping grain through the East China Sea or by several different inland canals that necessitated the transferring of grain onto several different barge types in the process, including shallow and deep water barges.[89] Yongle commissioned some 165,000 workers to dredge the canal bed in western Shandong and built a series of fifteen canal locks.[88][90] The reopening of the Grand Canal had implications for Nanjing as well, as it was surpassed by the well-positioned city of Suzhou as the paramount commercial center of China.[91]

Although Yongle ordered episodes of bloody purges like his father—including the execution of Fang Xiaoru who refused to draft the proclamation of his succession—Yongle had a different attitude about the scholar-officials.[87] He had a selection of texts compiled from the Cheng-Zhu school of Confucianism—or Neo-Confucianism—in order to assist those who studied for the civil service examinations.[87] Yongle commissioned two thousand scholars to create a 50-million word (22,938-chapter) long encyclopedia—the Yongle Encyclopedia—from seven thousand books.[87] This surpassed all previous encyclopedias in scope and size, including the 11th century compilation of the Four Great Books of Song. Yet the scholar-officials weren't the only political group that Yongle had to cooperate with and appease. Historian Michael Chang points out that Yongle was an "emperor on horseback" who often traversed between two capitals like in the Mongol Yuan tradition and constantly led expeditions into Mongolia.[92] This was opposed by the Confucian establishment while it served to bolster the importance of eunuchs and military officers whose power depended upon the emperor's favor.[92]

Treasure fleet

A giraffe brought from Africa in the twelfth year of Yongle (1414); the Chinese associated the giraffe with the mythical qilin.

Beginning in 1405, the Yongle Emperor entrusted his favored eunuch commander Zheng He (1371–1433) as the naval admiral for a gigantic new fleet of ships designated for international tributary missions. The Chinese had sent diplomatic missions over land and west since the Han Dynasty (202 BCE–220 CE) and had been engaged in private overseas trade leading all the way to East Africa for centuries—culminating in the Song and Yuan dynasties—but no government-sponsored tributary mission of this grandeur and size had ever been assembled before. To service seven different tributary missions abroad, the Nanjing shipyards constructed two thousand vessels from 1403 to 1419, which included the large treasure ships that measured 112 m (370 ft) to 134 m (440 ft) in length and 45 m (150 ft) to 54 m (180 ft) in width.[93] The first voyage from 1405 to 1407 contained 317 vessels with a staff of 70 eunuchs, 180 medical personnel, 5 astrologers, and 300 military officers commanding a total estimated force of 26,800 men.[94]

The enormous tributary missions were discontinued after the death of Zheng He, yet his death was only one of many culminating factors which brought the missions to an end. Yongle had conquered Vietnam in 1407, but Ming troops were pushed out in 1428 with significant costs to the Ming treasury; in 1431 the new Lê Dynasty of Vietnam was recognized as an independent tribute state.[95] There was also the threat and revival of Mongol power on the northern steppe which drew court attention away from other matters; to face this threat, a massive amount of funds were used to build the Great Wall after 1474.[96] Yongle's moving of the capital from Nanjing to Beijing was largely in response to the court's need of keeping a closer eye on the Mongol threat in the north.[97] Scholar-officials also associated the lavish expense of the fleets with eunuch power at court, and so halted funding for these ventures as a means to curtail further eunuch influence.[98]

Tumu Crisis and the Ming Mongols

The Oirat Mongol leader Esen Tayisi launched an invasion into Ming China in July of 1449. The chief eunuch Wang Zhen encouraged Emperor Zhengtong (r. 1435–1449) to personally lead a force to face the Mongols after a recent Ming defeat; marching off with 50,000 troops, Zhengtong left the capital and put his half-brother Zhu Qiyu in charge of affairs as temporary regent. In the battle that ensued on September 8, his force of 50,000 troops were decimated by Esen's army and Zhengtong was captured and held in captivity by the Mongols—an event known as the Tumu Crisis.[99] After Zhengtong's capture, Esen's forces plundered their way across the countryside and all the way to the suburbs of Beijing.[100] Following this was another plundering of the Beijing suburbs in November of that year by local bandits and Ming Dynasty soldiers of Mongol descent who dressed as invading Mongols.[101] Many Han Chinese also took to brigandage soon after the Tumu incident.[102][103]

The Great Wall of China; although the rammed earth walls of the ancient Warring States were combined into a unified wall under the Qin and Han dynasties, the vast majority of the brick and stone Great Wall as it is seen today is a product of the Ming Dynasty.

The Mongols held the Zhengtong Emperor for ransom. However, this scheme was foiled once Zhengtong's younger brother assumed the throne as the Jingtai Emperor (r. 1449–1457); the Mongols were also repelled once Jingtai's confidant and defense minister Yu Qian (1398–1457) gained control of the Ming armed forces. Holding Zhengtong in captivity was a useless bargaining chip for the Mongols as long as another sat on his throne, so they released him back into Ming China.[99] Zhengtong was placed under house arrest in the palace until the coup against Jingtai in 1457 known as the "Wresting the Gate Incident".[104] Zhengtong retook the throne as the Tianshun Emperor (r. 1457–1464).

Tianshun's reign was a troubled one and Mongol forces within the Ming military structure continued to be problematic. On August 7, 1461, the Chinese general Cao Qin and his Ming troops of Mongol descent staged a coup against Tianshun out of fear of being next on his purge-list of those who aided Jingtai's succession.[105] Mongols serving the Ming military also became increasingly circumspect as the Chinese began to heavily distrust their Mongol subjects after the Tumu Crisis.[106] Cao's rebel force managed to set fire to the western and eastern gates of the Imperial City (doused by rain during the battle) and killed several leading ministers before his forces were finally cornered and he was forced to commit suicide.[107][108]

The Mongol threat to China was at its greatest level in the 15th century, although periodic raiding continued throughout the dynasty. Like in the Tumu Crisis, the Mongol leader Altan Khan (1507–1582) invaded China and raided as far as the outskirts of Beijing.[109][110] Interestingly enough, the Ming employed troops of Mongol descent to fight back Altan Khan's invasion, as well as Mongol military officers against Cao Qin's abortive coup.[111] The Mongol incursions prompted the Ming authorities to construct the Great Wall from the late 15th century to the 16th century; John Fairbank notes that "it proved to be a futile military gesture but vividly expressed China's siege mentality."[96] Yet the Great Wall was not meant to be a purely defensive fortification; its towers functioned rather as a series of lit beacons and signalling stations to allow rapid warning to friendly units of advancing enemy troops.[112]

Isolation to globalization

Illegal trade, piracy, and war with Japan

16th century Japanese pirate raids.

In 1479, the vice president of the Ministry of War burned the court records documenting Zheng He's voyages; it was one of many events signalling China's shift to an inward foreign policy.[95] Shipbuilding laws were implemented that restricted vessels to a small size; the concurrent decline of the Ming navy allowed the growth of piracy along China's coasts.[96] Japanese pirates—or wokou—began staging raids on Chinese ships and coastal communities, although much of the piracy was carried out by native Chinese.[96]

Instead of mounting a counterattack, Ming authorities chose to shut down coastal facilities and starve the pirates out; all foreign trade was to be conducted by the state under the guise of formal tribute missions.[96] These policies were known as the hai jin laws, which enacted a strict ban on private maritime activity until the laws' formal abolishment in 1567.[95] In this period government-managed overseas trade with Japan was carried out exclusively at the seaport of Ningbo, trade with the Philippines exclusively at Fuzhou, and trade with Indonesia exclusively at Guangzhou.[113] Even then the Japanese were only allowed into port once every ten years and were allowed to bring a maximum of three hundred men on two ships; these laws encouraged many Chinese merchants to engage in widespread illegal trade and smuggling.[113]

The low point in relations between Ming China and Japan occurred during the rule of the great Japanese warlord Hideyoshi, who in 1592 announced he was going to conquer China. In two campaigns that are known collectively as the Imjin War, the Japanese fought with the Korean and Ming armies. Both sides won victories in the war but with Hideyoshi's death in 1598, the Japanese gave up their last Korean bases and returned to Japan. Despite this and the great leadership of Koreans such as the admiral Yi Sun-sin, the Ming generals took credit for the victory. However, the victory came at an enormous cost to the Ming government's treasury: some 26,000,000 ounces of silver.[114]

Trade and contact with Europe

Military command centers in 1580, concentrated mostly along the seacoast, the northern border, and the southwest; major courier routes shown are based on a map from Timothy Brook's The Confusions of Pleasure.

Although Jorge Álvares was the first to land on Lintin Island in the Pearl River Delta in May of 1513, it was Rafael Perestrello—a cousin of the famed Christopher Columbus—who became the first European explorer to land on the southern coast of mainland China and trade in Guangzhou in 1516, commanding a Portuguese vessel with a crew from a Malaysian junk that had sailed from Malacca.[115][116][117] The Portuguese sent a large subsequent expedition in 1517 to enter port at Guangzhou and open formal trade relations with Chinese authorities.[115] During this expedition the Portuguese attempted to send an inland delegation in the name of Manuel I of Portugal to the court of the Ming emperor Zhengde; instead the diplomatic mission languished in a Chinese jail and died there.[115] After the death of Zhengde in April 1521, the conservative faction at court that was against expanding commercial relations ordered that the Portuguese conquest of Malacca—a loyal vassal to the Ming—was grounds enough to reject the Portuguese embassy.[118] Simão de Andrade, brother to ambassador Fernão Pires de Andrade, had also stirred Chinese speculation that the Portuguese were kidnapping Chinese children to eat them; Simão had purchased kidnapped children as slaves who were later found in Diu, India.[119] In 1521, Ming Dynasty naval forces fought and repulsed Portuguese ships at Tuen Mun, where some of the first breech-loading culverins were introduced to China.[120] Despite initial hostilities, by 1549 the Portuguese were sending annual trade missions to Shangchuan Island.[115] In 1557 the Portuguese managed to convince the Ming court to agree on a legal port treaty that would establish Macau as an official Portuguese trade colony on the coasts of the South China Sea.[115] The Portuguese friar Gaspar da Cruz (c. 1520 – February 5, 1570) traveled to Guangzhou in 1556 and wrote the first complete book on China and the Ming Dynasty that was published in Europe (fifteen days after his death); it included information on its geography, provinces, royalty, official class, bureaucracy, shipping, architecture, farming, craftsmanship, merchant affairs, clothing, religious and social customs, music and instruments, writing, education, and justice.[121]

From China the major exports were silk and porcelain. The Dutch East India Company alone handled the trade of 6 million porcelain items from China to Europe between the years 1602 to 1682.[122] Antonio de Morga (1559–1636), a Spanish official in Manila, listed an extensive inventory of goods that were traded by Ming China at the turn of the 17th century, noting there were "rarities which, did I refer to them all, I would never finish, nor have sufficient paper for it".[123] After noting the variety of silk goods traded to Europeans, Ebrey writes of the considerable size of commercial transactions:

Map of East Asia by the Italian Jesuit Matteo Ricci in 1602; Ricci (1552–1610) was the first European allowed into the Forbidden City, taught the Chinese how to construct and play the spinet, translated Chinese texts into Latin and vice versa, and worked closely with his Chinese associate Xu Guangqi (1562–1633) on mathematical work.

In one case a galleon to the Spanish territories in the New World carried over 50,000 pairs of silk stockings. In return China imported mostly silver from Peruvian and Mexican mines, transported via Manila. Chinese merchants were active in these trading ventures, and many emigrated to such places as th Philippines and Borneo to take advantage of the new commercial opportunities.

— [113]

After the Chinese had banned direct trade by Chinese merchants with Japan, the Portuguese filled this commercial vacuum as intermediaries between China and Japan.[124] The Portuguese bought Chinese silk and sold it to the Japanese in return for Japanese-mined silver; since silver was more highly valued in China, the Portuguese could then use Japanese silver to buy even larger stocks of Chinese silk.[124] However, by 1573—after the Spanish established a trading base in Manila—the Portuguese intermediary trade was trumped by the prime source of incoming silver to China from the Spanish Americas.[125][126]

Although the bulk of imports to China were silver, the Chinese also purchased New World crops from the Spanish Empire. This included sweet potatoes, maize, and peanuts, foods that could be cultivated in lands where traditional Chinese staple crops—wheat, millet, and rice—couldn't grow, hence facilitating a rise in the population of China.[113][127] In the Song Dynasty (960–1279), rice had become the major staple crop of the poor;[128] after sweet potatoes were introduced to China around 1560, it gradually became the traditional food of the lower classes.[129]

Decline

Reign of the Wanli Emperor

The financial drain of the Imjin War in Korea against the Japanese was one of the many problems—fiscal or other—facing Ming China during the reign of the Wanli Emperor (r. 1572–1620). In the beginning of his reign, Wanli surrounded himself with able advisors and made a conscientious effort to handle state affairs. His Grand Secretary Zhang Juzheng (in office from 1572 to 1582) built up an effective network of alliances with senior officials.[130] However, there was no one after him skilled enough to maintain the stability of these alliances;[130] officials soon banded together in opposing political factions. Over time Wanli grew tired of court affairs and frequent political quarreling amongst his ministers, preferring to stay behind the walls of the Forbidden City and out of his officials' sight.[131]

Wanli Emperor (r. 1572–1620).

Officials aggravated Wanli about which of his sons should succeed to the throne; he also grew equally disgusted with senior advisors constantly bickering about how to manage the state.[131] There were rising factions at court and across the intellectual sphere of China stemming from the philosophical debate for or against the teaching of Wang Yangming (1472–1529), the latter of whom rejected some of the orthodox views of Neo-Confucianism.[132][133] Annoyed by all of this, Wanli began neglecting his duties, remaining absent from court audiences to discuss politics, lost interest in studying the Confucian Classics, refused to read petitions and other state papers, and stopped filling the recurrent vacancies of vital upper level administrative posts.[131][134] Scholar-officials lost prominence in administration as eunuchs became intermediaries between the aloof emperor and his officials; any senior official who wanted to discuss state matters had to persuade powerful eunuchs with a bribe simply to have his demands or message relayed to the emperor.[135]

Role of eunuchs

It was said that Hongwu forbade eunuchs to learn how to read or engage in politics.[88] Whether or not these restrictions were carried out with absolute success in his reign, eunuchs in the Yongle reign period and after managed huge imperial workshops, commanded armies, and participated in matters of appointment and promotion of officials.[88] The eunuchs developed their own bureaucracy that was organized parallel to but was not subject to the civil service bureaucracy.[88] Although there were several dictatorial eunuchs throughout the Ming, such as Wang Zhen, Wang Zhi, and Liu Jin, excessive tyrannical eunuch power did not become evident until the 1590s when Wanli increased their rights over the civil bureaucracy and granted them power to collect provincial taxes.[134][135][136]

Tianqi era teacups, from the Nantoyōsō Collection in Japan; the Tianqi Emperor was heavily influenced and largely controlled by the eunuch Wei Zhongxian (1568–1627).

The eunuch Wei Zhongxian (1568–1627) dominated the court of the Tianqi Emperor (r. 1620–1627) and had his political rivals tortured to death, mostly the vocal critics from the faction of the "Donglin Society".[137] He ordered temples built in his honor throughout the Ming Empire,[135] and built personal palaces created with funds allocated for building the previous emperor's tombs. His friends and family gained important positions without qualifications. Wei also published a historical work lambasting and belitting his political opponents.[135] The instability at court came right as natural calamity, pestilence, rebellion, and foreign invasion came to a peak. Although the Chongzhen Emperor (r. 1627–1644) had Wei dismissed from court—which led to Wei's suicide shortly after—the problem with court eunuchs persisted until the dynasty's collapse less than two decades later.

Economic breakdown and disaster

During the last years of Wanli's reign and those of his two successors, an economic crisis developed that was centered around a sudden widespread lack of the empire's chief medium of exchange: silver. The Protestant powers of the Dutch Republic and the Kingdom of England staged frequent raids and acts of piracy against the Catholic-based empires of Spain and Portugal in order to weaken their global economic power.[138] Meanwhile, Philip IV of Spain (r. 1621–1665) began cracking down on illegal smuggling of silver from Mexico and Peru across the Pacific towards China, in favor of shipping American-mined silver directly from Spain to Manila. In 1639, the new Tokugawa regime of Japan shut down most of its foreign trade with European powers, causing a halt of yet another source of silver coming into China. However, the greatest stunt to the flow of silver came from the Americas, while Japanese silver still came into China in limited amounts.[139] Some scholars even assert that the price of silver rose in the 17th century due to a falling demand for goods, not declining silver stocks.[140]

Spring morning in a Han palace, by Qiu Ying (1494–1552); excessive luxury and decadence were hallmarks of the late Ming period, spurred by the enormous state bullion of incoming silver and private transactions involving silver.

These events occurring at roughly the same time caused a dramatic spike in the value of silver and made paying taxes nearly impossible for most provinces. People began hoarding precious silver as there was progressively less of it, forcing the ratio of the value of copper to silver into a steep decline.[125] In the 1630s, a string of one thousand copper coins was worth an ounce of silver; by 1640 this was reduced to the value of half an ounce; by 1643 it was worth roughly one-third of an ounce.[125] For peasants this was an economic disaster, since they paid taxes in silver while conducting local trade and selling their crops with copper coins.[141]

In this early half of the 17th century, famines became common in northern China because of unusual dry and cold weather that shortened the growing season; these were effects of a larger ecological event now known as the Little Ice Age.[142] Famine, alongside tax increases, widespread military desertions, a declining relief system, and natural disasters such as flooding and inability of the government to properly manage irrigation and flood-control projects caused widespread loss of life and normal civility.[142] The central government was starved of resources and could do very little to mitigate the effects of these calamities. Making matters worse, a widespread epidemic spread across China from Zhejiang to Henan, killing a large but unknown number of people.[143]

Fall of the Dynasty

Rise of the Manchu

Shanhaiguan along the Great Wall, the gate where the Manchus were repeatedly repelled before being finally let through by Wu Sangui in 1644.

A remarkable tribal leader named Nurhaci (r. 1616–1626), starting with just a small tribe, rapidly gained control over all the Manchurian tribes. During the Imjin War he offered to lead his tribes in support of the Ming and Joseon army. This offer was declined, but he was granted honorific Ming titles for his gesture.[144] Recognizing the weakness in the Ming authority north of their border, he took control over all of the other unrelated tribes surrounding his homeland.[144] In 1610 he broke relations with the Ming court; in 1618 he demanded the Ming pay tribute to him to redress the seven grievances which he documented and sent to the Ming court. This was, in a very real sense, a declaration of war as the Ming were not about to pay money to the Manchu.

Under the brilliant commander Yuan Chonghuan (1584–1630), the Ming were able to repeatedly fight off the Manchus, notably in 1626 at the Battle of Ningyuan (In which Nurhaci was mortally wounded) and in 1628. Under Yuan's command the Ming had securely fortified the Shanhai pass, thus blocking the Manchus from crossing the pass to attack the Liaodong Peninsula. Using European firearms acquired from his cook, he was able to stave off Nurhaci's advances along the Liao River.[145] Although he was named field marshal of all the northeastern forces in 1628, he was executed in 1630 on trumped-up charges of colluding with the Manchus as they staged their raids.[146] Succeeding generals proved unable to eliminate the Manchu threat.

Unable to attack the heart of Ming directly, the Manchu instead bided their time, developing their own artillery and gathering allies. They were able to enlist Ming government officials and generals as their strategic advisors. A large part of the Ming Army deserted to the Manchu banner. In 1632, they had conquered much of Inner Mongolia,[145] resulting in a large scale recruitment of Mongol troops under the Manchu banner and the securing of an additional route into the Ming heartland.

By 1636, the Manchu ruler Huang Taiji renamed his dynasty from the "Latter Jin" to "Qing" at Shenyang, which had fallen to the Manchu in 1621 and was made their capital in 1625.[145][147][148] Huang Taiji also adopted the Chinese imperial title huangdi instead of khan, took the Imperial title Chongde ("Revering Virtue"), and changed the ethnic name of his people from Jurchen to Manchu.[149][148] In 1638 the Manchu defeated and conquered Ming China's traditional ally Joseon with an army of 100,000 troops. Shortly after the Koreans renounced their long-held loyalty to the Ming Dynasty.[149]

Rebellion, invasion, collapse

The Shunzhi Emperor (1644–1661), proclaimed the ruler of China on October 8, 1644.

A peasant soldier named Li Zicheng (1606–1644) mutinied with his fellow soldiers in western Shaanxi in the early 1630s after the government failed to ship much-needed supplies there.[142] In 1634 he was captured by a Ming general and released only on the terms that he return to service.[150] The agreement soon broke down when a local magistrate had thirty-six of his fellow rebels executed; Li's troops retaliated by killing the officials and continued to lead a rebellion based in Rongyang, central Henan province by 1635.[151] By the 1640s, an ex-soldier and rival to Li—Zhang Xianzhong (1606–1647)—had created a firm rebel base in Chengdu, Sichuan, while Li's center of power was in Hubei with extended influence over Shaanxi and Henan.[151]

In 1640, masses of Chinese peasants who were starving, unable to pay their taxes, and no longer in fear of the frequently defeated Chinese army, began to form into huge bands of rebels. The Chinese military, caught between fruitless efforts to defeat the Manchu raiders from the north and huge peasant revolts in the provinces, essentially fell apart. Unpaid and unfed, the army was defeated by Li Zicheng—now self-styled as the Prince of Shun—and deserted the capital without much of a fight.[152] Li's forces were allowed into the city when the gates were treacherously opened from within.[152] On May 26, 1644, Beijing fell to a rebel army led by Li Zicheng; during the turmoil, the last Ming emperor hung himself on a tree in the imperial garden right outside the Forbidden City.[152]

Seizing opportunity, the Manchus crossed the Great Wall after the Ming border general Wu Sangui (1612–1678) opened the gates at Shanhai Pass. This occurred shortly after he learned about the fate of the capital and an army of Li Zicheng marching towards him; weighing his options of alliance, he decided to side with the Manchus.[153] The Manchu army under the Manchu Prince Dorgon (1612–1650) and Wu Sangui approached Beijing after the army sent by Li was destroyed at Shanhaiguan; the Prince of Shun's army fled the capital on the fourth of June.[154] On June 6 the Manchus and Wu entered the capital and proclaimed the young Shunzhi Emperor ruler of China.[154] After being forced out of Xi'an by the Manchus, chased along the Han River to Wuchang, and finally along the northern border of Jiangxi province, Li Zicheng died there in the summer of 1645, thus ending the Shun Dynasty.[154] One report says his death was a suicide; another states that he was beaten to death by peasants after he was caught stealing their food.[154] Zhang Xianzhong was killed in January of 1647 by Manchu troops after he fled Chengdu and employed scorched earth policy.[155]

Scattered Ming remnants still existed after 1644, including those of Koxinga. Despite the loss of Beijing and the death of the emperor, Ming power was by no means totally destroyed. Nanjing, Fujian, Guangdong, Shanxi, and Yunnan were all strongholds of Ming resistance. However, there were several pretenders for the Ming throne, and their forces were divided. Each bastion of resistance was individually defeated by the Qing until 1662, when the last real hopes of a Ming revival died with the Yongli emperor, Zhu Youlang. Despite the Ming defeat, smaller loyalist movements continued until the proclamation of the Republic of China.

Government

Province, prefecture, subprefecture, county

Processional figurines from the Shanghai tomb of Pan Yongzheng, a Ming Dynasty official who lived during the 16th century

The Ming emperors took over the provincial administration system of the Yuan Dynasty, and the thirteen Ming provinces are the precursors of the modern provinces. Throughout the Song Dynasty, the largest political division was the circuit (lu).[156] However, after the Jurchen invasion in 1127, the Song court established four semi-autonomous regional command systems based on territorial and military units, with a detached service secretariat that would become the provincial administrations of the Yuan, Ming, and Qing dynasties.[157] At the provincial level, the Yuan central government structure was copied by the Ming; the bureaucracy contained three provincial commissions: one civil, one military, and one for surveillance. Below the level of the province (sheng) were prefectures (fu) operating under a prefect, followed by subprefectures (zhou) under a subprefect.[158] Finally, the lowest unit was the county (xian) overseen by a magistrate.[158] Besides the provinces, there were also two large areas that belonged to no province, but were metropolitan areas (jing) attached to Nanjing and Beijing.[158]

Institutions and bureaus

Institutional trends

The Forbidden City, the official imperial household of the Ming and Qing dynasties from 1420 until 1924, when the Republic of China evicted Puyi from the Inner Court.

Departing from the main central administrative system generally known as the Three Departments and Six Ministries system, which was instituted by various dynasties since late Han, the Ming administration had only one Department, the Secretariat, that controlled the Six Ministries. Following the execution of the Chancellor Hu Weiyong in 1380, emperor Hongwu abolished the Secretariat, the Censorate, and the Chief Military Commission and personally took charge of the Six Ministries and the regional Five Military Commissions.[159][160] Thus a whole level of administration was cut out and only partially rebuilt by subsequent rulers.[159] The Grand Secretariat, at the beginning a secretarial institution that assisted the emperor with administrative paperwork, was instituted, but without employing grand counselors, or chancellors. The ministries, headed by a minister and run by directors remained under direct control of the emperor until the end of the Ming.

The Hongwu Emperor sent his heir apparent to Shaanxi in 1391 to "tour and soothe" (xunfu) the region; in 1421 the Yongle Emperor commissioned 26 officials to travel the empire and uphold similar investigatory and patrimonial duties.[161] By 1430 these xunfu assignments became institutionalized.[161] Hence, the Censorate was reinstalled and first staffed with investigating censors, later with censors-in-chief. By 1453, the "grand coordinators"—or "touring pacifiers" as Michael Chang notes—were granted the title vice censor-in-chief or assistant censor-in-chief and were allowed direct access to the emperor.[161] As in prior dynasties, the provincial administrations were monitored by a travelling inspector from the Censorate. Censors had the power to impeach officials on an irregular basis, unlike the senior officials who were to do so only in triennial evaluations of junior officials.[162][161]

Although decentralization of state power within the provinces occurred in the early Ming, the trend of central government officials delegated to the provinces as virtual provincial governors began in the 1420s.[163] By the late Ming Dynasty, there were central government officials delegated to two or more provinces as supreme commanders and viceroys, a system which reigned in the power and influence of the military by the civil establishment.[163]

Grand Secretariat and Six Ministries

A portrait of the official Jiang Shunfu (1453–1504), now in the Nanjing Museum. The decoration of two cranes on his chest are a "rank badge" that indicate he was a civil official of the first rank.

Governmental institutions in China conformed to a similar pattern for some two thousand years, but each dynasty installed special offices and bureaus, reflecting its own particular interests. The Ming administration had the Grand Secretaries assisting the emperor, with paperwork handled by them under Yongle's reign and finally appointed as top officials of agencies and Grand Preceptor, a top-ranking, non-functional civil service post, under the Hongxi Emperor (r. 1424–1425).[164] The Grand Secretariat drew its members from the Hanlin Academy and were considered part of the imperial authority, not the ministerial one (hence being at odds with both the emperor and ministers at times).[165] The Secretariat was a coordinating agency, whereas the Six Ministries—which were Personnel, Revenue, Rites, War, Justice, and Public Works—were direct administrative organs of the state.[166] The Ministry of Personnel was in charge of appointments, merit ratings, promotions, and demotions of officials, as well as granting of honorific titles.[167] The Ministry of Revenue was in charge of gathering census data, collecting taxes, and handling state revenues, while there were two offices of currency that were subordinate to it.[168] The Ministry of Rites was in charge of state ceremonies, rituals, and sacrifices; it also oversaw registers for Buddhist and Daoist priesthoods and even the reception of envoys from tributary states.[169] The Ministry of War was in charge of the appointments, promotions, and demotions of military officers, the maintenance of military installations, equipment, and weapons, as well as the courier system.[170] The Ministry of Justice was in charge of judicial and penal processes, but had no supervisory role over the Censorate or the Grand Court of Revision.[171] The Ministry of Works was in charge of government construction projects, hiring of artisans and laborers for temporary service, manufacturing government equipment, the maintenance of roads and canals, standardization of weights and measures, and the gathering of resources from the countryside.[171]

Bureaus and offices for the imperial household

The Ming Imperial Court, by an unknown artist, c. 1580 AD.

The imperial household was staffed almost entirely by eunuchs and ladies with their own bureaus.[172] Female servants were organized into the Bureau of Palace Attendance, Bureau of Ceremonies, Bureau of Apparel, Bureau of Foodstuffs, Bureau of the Bedchamber, Bureau of Handicrafts, and Office of Staff Surveillance.[172] Starting in the 1420s, eunuchs began taking over these ladies' positions until only the Bureau of Apparel with its four subsidiary offices remained.[172] Hongwu had his eunuchs organized into the Directorate of Palace Attendants, but as eunuch power at court increased, so did their administrative offices, with eventual twelve directorates, four offices, and eight bureaus.[172] The dynasty had a vast imperial household, staffed with thousands of eunuchs, who were headed by the Directorate of Palace Attendants. The eunuchs were divided into different directorates in charge of staff surveillance, ceremonial rites, food, utensils, documents, stables, seals, apparel, and so on.[78] The offices were in charge of providing fuel, music, paper, and baths.[78] The bureaus were in charge of weapons, silverwork, laundering, headgear, bronzework, textile manufacture, wineries, and gardens.[78] At times, the most influential eunuch in the Directorate of Ceremonial acted as a de facto dictator over the state.[136][78]

Although the imperial household was staffed mostly by eunuchs and palace ladies, there was a civil service office called the Seal Office, which cooperated with eunuch agencies in maintaining imperial seals, tallies, and stamps.[173] There were also civil service offices to oversee the affairs of imperial princes.[174]

Personnel

Scholar-officials

After the reign of Hongwu—who from 1373 to 1384 staffed his bureaus with officials gathered through recommendations only—the scholar-officials who populated the many ranks of bureaucracy were recruited through a rigorous examination system that was first established by the Sui Dynasty (581–618).[175][176][177] Theoretically the system of exams allowed anyone to join the ranks of imperial officials (although frowned upon for merchants to join); in reality the time and funding needed to support the study in preparation for the exam generally limited participants to those already coming from the landholding class.[178] However, the government did exact provincial quotas while drafting officials.[179] This was an effort to curb monopolization of power by landholding gentry who came from the most prosperous regions, where education was the most advanced.[179] The expansion of the printing industry since Song times enhanced the spread of knowledge and number of potential exam candidates throughout the provinces.[180] For young schoolchildren there were printed multiplication tables and primers for elementary vocabulary; for adult examination candidates there were mass-produced, inexpensive volumes of Confucian classics and successful examination answers.[181]

Candidates who had taken the civil service examinations would crowd around the wall where the results were posted; detail from a handscroll in ink and color on silk, by Qiu Ying (1494–1552).[182]

As in earlier periods, the focus of the examination was classical Confucian texts,[175] while the bulk of test material centered on the Four Books outlined by Zhu Xi in the 12th century.[183] Ming era examinations were perhaps more difficult to pass since the 1487 requirement of completing the "eight-legged essay", a departure from basing essays off progressing literary trends.[14][183] The exams increased in difficulty as the student progressed from the local level, and appropriate titles were accordingly awarded successful applicants. Officials were classified in nine hierarchic grades, each grade divided into two degrees, with ranging salaries (nominally paid in piculs of rice) according to their rank.[184] While provincial graduates who were appointed to office were immediately assigned to low-ranking posts like the county graduates, those who passed the palace examination were awarded a jinshi ('presented scholar') degree and assured a high-level position.[185][186] In 276 years of Ming rule and ninety palace examinations, the number of doctoral degrees granted by passing the palace examinations was 24,874.[185] Ebrey states that "there were only two to four thousand of these jinshi at any given time, on the order of one out of 10,000 adult males."[178] This was in comparison to the 100,000 shengyuan ('government students'), the lowest tier of graduates, by the 16th century.[178]

The maximum tenure in office was nine years, but every three years officials were graded on their performance by senior officials.[187] If they were graded as superior then they were promoted, if graded adequate then they retained their ranks, and if graded inadequate they were demoted one rank.[162] In extreme cases, officials would be dismissed or punished.[162] Only capital officials of grade 4 and above were exempt from the scrutiny of recorded evaluation, although they were expected to confess any of their faults.[162] There were over 4,000 school instructors in county and prefectural schools who were subject to evaluations every nine years.[188] The Chief Instructor on the prefectural level was classified as equal to a second-grade county graduate.[188] The Supervisorate of Imperial Instruction oversaw the education of the heir apparent to the throne; this office was headed by a Grand Supervisor of Instruction, who was ranked as first class of grade three.[174]

Lesser functionaries

Scholar-officials who entered civil service through examinations acted as executive officials to a much larger body of non-ranked personnel called lesser functionaries.[189] They outnumbered officials by four to one; Charles Hucker estimates that they were perhaps as many as 100,000 throughout the empire.[189] These lesser functionaries performed clerical and technical tasks for government agencies.[189] Yet they should not be confused with lowly lictors, runners, and bearers; lesser functionaries were given periodic merit evaluations like officials and after nine years of service might be accepted into a low civil service rank.[189] The one great advantage of the lesser functionaries over officials was that officials were periodically rotated and assigned to different regional posts and had to rely on the good service and cooperation of the local lesser functionaries.[190]

Eunuchs, princes and generals

The Xuande Emperor playing chuiwan with his eunuchs, a game similar to golf, by an anonymous court painter of the Xuande period (1425-1435).

Eunuchs during the Ming Dynasty gained unprecedented power over state affairs. One of the most effective means of control was the secret service stationed in what was called the Eastern Depot at the beginning of the dynasty, later the Western Depot.[78] This secret service was overseen by the Directorate of Ceremonial, hence this state organ's often totalitarian affiliation.[78] Eunuchs had ranks that were equivalent to civil service ranks, only theirs had four grades instead of nine.[191]

Princes and descendants of the first Ming emperor were given nominal military commands and large land estates without title. These estates were not feudatories, the princes did not serve any administrative function, and it was only during the reign of the first two emperors that they partook in military affairs.[192] By contrast, princes in the Han and Jin Dynasties had been installed as local kings. Although princes served no organ of state administration, princes, consorts of imperial princesses, and ennobled relatives did staff the Imperial Clan Court, which took care of the imperial genealogy.[174]

Like scholar-officials, military generals were ranked in a hierarchic grading system and were given merit evaluations every five years (as opposed to three years for officials).[193] However, military officers had less prestige than officials. This was due to their hereditary service (instead of solely merit-based) and Confucian values that dictated those who chose the profession of violence (wu) over the cultured pursuits of knowledge (wen).[193][194] Although seen as less prestigious, military officers were not excluded from taking civil service examinations and after 1478 the military even held their own examinations to test military skills.[195] In addition to taking over the established bureaucratic structure from the Yuan period, the Ming emperors established the new post of the travelling military inspector. In the early half of the dynasty, men of noble lineage dominated the higher ranks of military office; this trend was reversed during the latter half of the dynasty as men from more humble origins eventually displaced them.[196]

Society and culture

Literature and arts

A Ming Dynasty red lacquer box with intricate carving of people in the countryside, surrounded by a floral border design.

As in earlier dynasties, the Ming Dynasty saw a flourishing in the arts, whether it was painting, poetry, music, literature, or dramatic theater. Carved designs in lacquerwares and designs glazed onto porcelain wares displayed intricate scenes similar in complexity to those in painting. These items could be found in the homes of the wealthy, alongside embroidered silks and wares in jade, ivory, and cloisonné.[197] The houses of the rich were also furnished with rosewood furniture and feathery latticework. The writing materials in a scholar's private study, including elaborately carved brush holders made of stone or wood, were all designed and arranged ritually to give an aesthetic appeal.[197]

Connoisseurship in the late Ming period centered around these items of refined artistic taste, which provided work for art dealers and even underground scammers who made phony imitations of originals and false attributions to works of art.[197] This was noted even by the Jesuit Matteo Ricci while staying in Nanjing, writing that Chinese scam artists were ingenious when it came to making forgeries of artwork and made huge profits.[198] However, there were guides to help the wary new connoisseur; in Liu Tong's (d. 1637) book printed in 1635, he told his readers various ways to spot a fake and authentic pieces of art.[199] He revealed that a Xuande era (1426–1435) bronzework could be authenticated if one knew how to judge its sheen; porcelain wares from the Yongle era (1402–1424) could be judged authentic by their thickness.[200]

Lofty Mount Lu, by Shen Zhou, 1467.

There was a great amount of literary achievement in the Ming Dynasty. The travel literature author Xu Xiake (1587–1641) published his Travel Diaries in 404,000 written characters, with information on everything from local geography to mineralogy.[201][202] The first reference to the publishing of private newspapers in Beijing was in 1582; by 1638 the Beijing Gazette switched from using woodblock print to movable type printing.[203] The new literary field of the moral guide to business ethics was developed by the late Ming period, for the readership of the merchant class.[204] Although short story fiction was popular as far back as the Tang Dynasty (618–907),[205] and the work of contemporaneous authors such as Xu Guangqi, Xu Xiake, and Song Yingxing were often technical and encyclopedic, the Ming era witnessed the development of the fictional novel. While the gentry elite were educated enough to fully comprehend the language of Classical Chinese, those with rudimentary education—such as women in educated families, merchants, and shop clerks—became a large, potential audience for literature and performing arts that employed Vernacular Chinese.[206] The Jin Ping Mei—published in 1610—is considered by some to be the fifth great novel of pre-modern China, in reference to the Four Great Classical Novels. Two of these novels, the Water Margin and Journey to the West were products of the Ming Dynasty. To complement the work of fictional novels, the theater scripts of playwrights were equally imaginative. One of the most famous plays in Chinese history, The Peony Pavilion, was written by the Ming playwright Tang Xianzu (1550–1616), with its first performance at the Pavilion of Prince Teng in 1598.

In contrast to Xu Xiake, who focused on technical aspects in his travel literature, the Chinese poet and official Yuan Hongdao (1568–1610) used travel literature to express his desires for individualism as well as autonomy from and frustration with Confucian court politics.[207] Yuan desired to free himself from the ethical compromises which were inseparable from the career of a scholar-official.[208] This anti-official sentiment in Yuan's travel literature and poetry was actually following in the tradition of the Song Dynasty poet and official Su Shi (1037–1101).[208] Yuan Hongdao and his two brothers—Yuan Zongdao (1560–1600) and Yuan Zhongdao (1570–1623)—were the founders of the Gong'an School of letters.[209] This highly individualistic school of poetry and prose was criticized by the Confucian establishment for its association with intense sensual lyricism, which was also apparent in Ming vernacular novels such as the Jin Ping Mei.[209] Yet even gentry and scholar-officials were affected by the new popular romantic literature, seeking courtesans as soulmates to reenact the heroic love stories which arranged marriages often could not provide or accommodate.[210]

Painting of flowers, a butterfly, and rock sculpture by Chen Hongshou (1598–1652); small leaf album paintings like this one first became popular in the Song Dynasty.

There were many famous visual artists in the Ming period, including Ni Zan, Shen Zhou, Tang Yin, Wen Zhengming, Qiu Ying, Dong Qichang, and many others. They drew upon the techniques, styles, and complexity in painting achieved by their Song and Yuan predecessors, but added some new techniques and styles. Well-known Ming artists could make a living simply by painting, due to the high costs they demanded for their artworks and the great demand by the highly cultured community to collect precious works of art.[211] The artist Qiu Ying was once paid 2.8 kg (100 oz) of silver to paint a long handscroll for the occasion of an eightieth birthday celebration for the mother of a wealthy patron.[211] Renowned artists often gathered an entourage of followers, some who were amateurs who painted while pursuing an official career and others who were full-time painters.[211]

Beyond painters, some potters also became renowned for their artwork, such as He Chaozong in the early 17th century for his style of white porcelain sculpture. The major production centers for porcelain items in the Ming Dynasty were Jingdezhen in Jiangxi province and Dehua in Fujian province. The Dehua porcelain factories catored to European tastes by creating Chinese export porcelain by the 16th century. In The Ceramic Trade in Asia, Chuimei Ho estimates that only 16% of Chinese ceramic exports in the late Ming were sent to Europe while the rest were destined for Japan and South East Asia.[212]

Religion

Chinese glazed stoneware statue of a Daoist deity, from the Ming Dynasty, 16th century.

For thousands of years the beliefs in ancestor worship and practices of the ancestral cult were key features of Chinese civilization. The Chinese believed in a host of deities in what is termed as Chinese folk religion. Other religious denominations in the Ming included the ancient native ideology of Daoism (Taoism) and foreign originated Buddhism, although distinct Chinese Buddhism had long since developed.

Christianity had existed in China since at least the Tang Dynasty (618–907), yet the late Ming period saw the first arrival of Jesuit missionaries from Europe such as Matteo Ricci and Nicolas Trigault. There were also other denominations including the Dominicans and Franciscans.

Ricci worked with the Chinese mathematician, astronomer, and agronomist Xu Guangqi to translate the Greek mathematical work Euclid's Elements into Chinese for the first time in 1607. The Chinese were impressed with European knowledge in astronomy, calendrical science, mathematics, hydraulics, and geography. Most European monks presented themselves more as educated elites than religious figures, in an effort to gain trust and admiration from the Chinese.[213] However, most Chinese were suspicious and even outright critical of Christianity due to Chinese beliefs and practices that did not coincide with the Christian faith.[213] The highpoint of this contention was the Nanjing Religious Incident of 1616–1622, a temporary triumph of the Confucian traditionalists when Western missionaries and science were rejected in favor of the belief that Western science derived from a superior Chinese model; this was soon rejected in favor of once again staffing the Imperial Astronomical Board with Western missionaries learned in science.[214]

Besides Christianity, the Kaifeng Jews had a long history in China; Ricci discovered this when he was contacted by one of them in Beijing and learned of their history in China.[215] Islam in China had existed since the early 7th century during the Tang Dynasty; during the Ming Dynasty there were several prominent figures—including Zheng He—who were Muslim. The Hongwu Emperor also employed Muslim commanders in his army, such as Chang Yuqun, Lan Yu, Ding Dexing, and Mu Ying.[216]

Philosophy

Wang Yangming (1472–1529), considered the most influential Confucian thinker since Zhu Xi.

Wang Yangming's Confucianism

During the Ming Dynasty, the doctrines of the Song Dynasty scholar-official Zhu Xi (1130–1200) and Neo-Confucianism were embraced by the court and the Chinese literati at large. However, total conformity to a single mode of thought was never a reality in the intellectual sphere of society. There were some in the Ming who—like Su Shi (1037–1101) of the Song—were rebels at heart and were not abashed to criticize the mainstream dogmatic modes of thought. Leading a new strand of Confucian teaching and philosophy was the scholar-official Wang Yangming (1472–1529), whose critics said that his teachings were contaminated by Chan Buddhism.[217]

In analyzing Zhu Xi's concept of "the extension of knowledge" (i.e. gaining understanding through careful and rational investigation of things and events), Wang realized that universal principles were concepts espoused in the minds of all.[218] Breaking from the mold, Wang said that anyone, no matter what socioeconomic status or background, could become as wise as the ancient sages Confucius and Mencius, and that the writings of the latter two were not the source of truth, but merely guides that could have flaws if carefully examined.[219] In Wang's mind, a peasant who had many experiences and drew natural truths from these was more wise than an official who had carefully studied the Classics but had not experienced the real world in order to observe what was true.[219]

Conservative reaction

A Ming Dynasty print drawing of Confucius on his way to the Zhou Dynasty capital of Luoyang.

Conservative Confucian officials were wary of Wang's philosophical interpretation of the Confucian classics, the increasing number of his disciples while still in office, and his overall socially-rebellious message.[217] To curb his political influence he was often sent out to deal with military affairs and rebellions far away from the capital.[217] Yet his ideas penetrated mainstream Chinese thought, and spurred new interest in Daoism and Buddhism.[217] Furthermore, people began to question the validity of the social hierarchy and the idea that the scholar was above the farmer.[217] Wang Yangming's disciple and salt-mine worker Wang Gen gave lectures to commoners about pursuing education to improve their lives, while his follower He Xinyin challenged the elevation and emphasis of the family in Chinese society.[217] He's contemporary Li Zhi (1527–1602) even taught that women were the intellectual equals of men and should be given a better education; both Li and He eventually died in prison, jailed on charges of spreading "dangerous ideas".[220] Yet these "dangerous ideas" of educating women had long been embraced with mothers giving their children primary education,[221] as well as courtesans who were as literate and similarly trained in calligraphy, painting, and poetry as their male hosts.[222]

In opposition to the liberal views of Wang Yangming were the conservative officials in the censorate—a governmental institution with the right and responsibility to speak out against malfeasance and abuse of power—and the senior officials of the Donglin Academy, which was reestablished in 1604.[223] These conservatives wanted a revival of orthodox Confucian ethics. Conservatives such as Gu Xiancheng (1550–1612) argued against Wang Yangming's idea of innate moral knowledge, stating that this was simply a legitimization for unscrupulous behavior such as greedy pursuits and personal gain.[223] These two strands of Confucian thought created factionalism amongst ministers of state, who—like the old days of Wang Anshi and Sima Guang in the Song Dynasty—used any opportunity to impeach members of the other faction from court.[223]

Urban and rural life

Wang Gen was able to give philosophical lectures to many commoners from different regions because—following the trend already apparent in the Song Dynasty—communities in Ming society were becoming less isolated as the distance between market towns was shrinking.[224] Schools, descent groups, religious associations, and other local voluntary organizations were increasing in number and allowing more contact between educated men and local villagers.[224] Jonathan Spence writes that the distinction between what was town and country was blurred in Ming China, since suburban areas with farms were located just outside and in some cases within the walls of a city.[225] Not only was the blurring of town and country evident, but also of socioeconomic class in the traditional four occupations, since artisans sometimes worked on farms in peak periods and farmers often traveled into the city to find work during times of dearth.[225]

Emperor Minghuang's Journey to Sichuan, a Ming Dynasty painting after Qiu Ying (1494-1552).

A variety of occupations could be chosen or inherited from a father's line of work. This would include—but was not limited to—coffinmakers, ironworkers and blacksmiths, tailors, cooks and noodle-makers, retail merchants, tavern, teahouse, or winehouse managers, shoemakers, seal cutters, pawnshop owners, brothel heads, and merchant bankers engaging in a proto-banking system involving notes of exchange.[226][125] Virtually every town had a brothel where female and male prostitutes could be had.[227] Male catamites fetched a higher price than female concubines since pederasty with a teenage boy was seen as a mark of elite status, regardless of sodomy being repugnant to sexual norms.[228] Public bathing became much more common than in earlier periods.[229] Urban shops and retailers sold a variety of goods such as special paper money to burn at ancestral sacrifices, specialized luxury goods, headgear, fine cloth, teas, and others.[226] Smaller communities and townships too poor or scattered to support shops and artisans obtained their goods from periodic market fairs and traveling peddlers.[225] A small township also provided a place for simple schooling, news and gossip, matchmaking, religious festivals, traveling theater groups, tax collection, and bases of famine relief distribution.[225]

Farming villagers in the north spent their days harvesting crops like wheat and millet, while farmers south of the Huai River engaged in intensive rice cultivation and had lakes and ponds where ducks and fish could be raised. The cultivation of mulberry trees for silkworms and tea bushes could be found mostly south of the Yangzi River; even further south of this sugarcane and citrus were grown as basic crops.[225] Some people in the mountainous southwest made a living by selling lumber from hard bamboo. Besides cutting down trees to sell wood, the poor also made a living by turning wood into charcoal, burning oyster shells to make lime, fired pots, and wove mats and baskets.[230] In the north traveling by horse and carriage was most common, while in the south the myriad of rivers, canals, and lakes provided cheap and easy water transport. Although the south had the characteristic of the wealthy landlord and tenant farmers, there were on average many more owner-cultivators north of the Huai River due to harsher climate, living not far above subsistence level.[231]

Science and technology

The puddling process of smelting iron ore to make pig iron from wrought iron, with the right illustration displaying men working a blast furnace, from the Tiangong Kaiwu encyclopedia, 1637.

Compared to the flourishing of science and technology in the Song Dynasty, the Ming Dynasty perhaps saw fewer advancements in science and technology compared to the pace of discovery in the Western world. In fact, key advances in Chinese science in the late Ming were spurred by contact with Europe. In 1626 Johann Adam Schall von Bell wrote the first Chinese treatise on the telescope, the Yuanjingshuo (Far Seeing Optic Glass); in 1634 the last Ming emperor Chongzhen acquired the telescope of the late Johann Schreck (1576–1630).[232] The heliocentric model of the solar system was rejected by the Catholic missionaries in China, but Johannes Kepler and Galileo Galilei's ideas slowly trickled into China starting with the Polish Jesuit Michael Boym (1612–1659) in 1627, Adam Schall von Bell's treatise in 1640, and finally Joseph Edkins, Alex Wylie, and John Fryer in the 19th century.[233] Catholic Jesuits in China would promote Copernican theory at court, yet at the same time embrace the Ptolemaic system in their writing; it was not until 1865 that Catholic missionaries in China sponsored the heliocentric model as their Protestant peers did.[234] Although Shen Kuo (1031–1095) and Guo Shoujing (1231–1316) had laid the basis for trigonometry in China, another important work in Chinese trigonometry would not be published again until 1607 with the efforts of Xu Guangqi and Matteo Ricci.[235] Ironically, some inventions which had their origins in ancient China were reintroduced to China from Europe during the late Ming; for example, the field mill.[236]

The Chinese calendar was in need of reform since it inadequately measured the solar year at 365¼ days, giving an error of 10 min and 14 sec a year or roughly a full day every 128 years.[237] Although the Ming had adopted Guo Shoujing's Shoushi calendar of 1281, which was just as accurate as the Gregorian Calendar, the Ming Directorate of Astronomy failed to periodically readjust it; this was perhaps due to their lack of expertise since their offices had become hereditary in the Ming and the Statutes of the Ming prohibited private involvement in astronomy.[238] A sixth-generation descendant of Emperor Hongxi, the "Prince" Zhu Zaiyu (1536–1611), submitted a proposal to fix the calendar in 1595, but the ultra-conservative astronomical commission rejected it.[237][238] It should be noted that this was the same Zhu Zaiyu who discovered the system of tuning known as equal temperament, a discovery made simultaneously by Simon Stevin (1548–1620) in Europe.[239] In addition to publishing his works on music, he was able to publish his findings on the calendar in 1597.[238] A year earlier, the memorial of Xing Yunlu suggesting a calendrical improvement was shot down by the Supervisor of the Astronomical Bureau due to the law banning private practice of astronomy; Xing would later serve with Xu Guangqi in reforming the calendar in 1629 according to Western standards.[238]

Portrait of Matteo Ricci by Yu Wenhui, Latinized as Emmanuel Pereira, dated the year of Matteo's death, 1610

When the Ming founder Hongwu came upon the mechanical devices housed in the Yuan Dynasty's palace at Khanbaliq—such as fountains with balls dancing on their jets, self-operating tiger automata, dragon-headed devices that spouted mists of perfume, and mechanical clocks in the tradition of Yi Xing (683–727) and Su Song (1020–1101)—he associated all of them with the decadence of Mongol rule and had them destroyed.[240] This was described in full length by the Divisional Director of the Ministry of Works, Xiao Xun, who also carefully preserved details on the architecture and layout of the Yuan Dynasty palace.[240] Later, European Jesuits such as Matteo Ricci and Nicolas Trigault would briefly mention indigenous Chinese clockworks that featured drive wheels.[241] However, both Ricci and Trigault were quick to point out that 16th century European clockworks were far more advanced than the common time keeping devices in China, which they listed as water clocks, incense clocks, and "other instruments...with wheels rotated by sand as if by water."[242] Chinese records—namely the Yuan Shi—describe the 'five-wheeled sand clock', a mechanism pioneered by Zhan Xiyuan (fl. 1360–1380) which featured the scoop wheel of Su Song's earlier astronomical clock and a stationary dial face over which a pointer circulated, similar to European models of the time.[243] This sand-driven wheel clock was improved upon by Zhou Shuxue (fl. 1530–1558) who added a fourth large gear wheel, changed gear ratios, and widened the orifice for collecting sand grains since he criticized the earlier model for clogging up too often.[244]

The Chinese were intrigued with European technology, but so were visiting Europeans of Chinese technology. In 1584, Abraham Ortelius (1527–1598) featured in his atlas Theatrum Orbis Terrarum the peculiar Chinese innovation of mounting masts and sails onto carriages, just like Chinese ships.[245] Gonzales de Mendoza also mentioned this a year later—noting even the designs of them on Chinese silken robes—while Gerardus Mercator (1512–1594) featured them in his atlas, John Milton (1608–1674) in one of his famous poems, and Andreas Everardus van Braam Houckgeest (1739–1801) in the writings of his travel diary in China.[246]

Bodhisattva Manjusri in Blanc-de-Chine, by He Chaozong, 17th century; Song Yingxing devoted an entire section of his book to the ceramics industry in the making of porcelain items like this.[247]

The encyclopedist Song Yingxing (1587–1666) documented a wide array of technologies, metallurgic and industrial processes in his Tiangong Kaiwu encyclopedia of 1637. This includes mechanical and hydraulic powered devices for agriculture and irrigation,[248] nautical technology such as vessel types and snorkeling gear for pearl divers,[249][250][251] the annual processes of sericulture and weaving with the loom,[252] metallurgic processes such as the crucible technique and quenching,[253] manufacturing processes such as for roasting iron pyrite in converting sulphide to oxide in sulfur used in gunpowder compositions—illustrating how ore was piled up with coal briquettes in an earthen furnace with a still-head that sent over sulfur as vapor that would solidify and crystallize[254]—and the use of gunpowder weapons such as a naval mine ignited by use of a rip-cord and steel flint wheel.[255]

Focusing on agriculture in his Nongzheng Quanshu, the agronomist Xu Guangqi (1562–1633) took an interest in irrigation, fertilizers, famine relief, economic and textile crops, and empirical observation of the elements that gave insight into early understandings of chemistry.[256]

There were many advances and new designs in gunpowder weapons during the beginning of the dynasty, but by the mid to late Ming the Chinese began to frequently employ European-style artillery and firearms.[257] The Huolongjing, compiled by Jiao Yu and Liu Ji sometime before the latter's death on May 16, 1375 (with a preface added by Jiao in 1412),[258] featured many types of cutting-edge gunpowder weaponry for the time. This includes hollow, gunpowder-filled exploding cannonballs,[259] land mines that used a complex trigger mechanism of falling weights, pins, and a steel wheellock to ignite the train of fuses,[260] naval mines,[261] fin-mounted winged rockets for aerodynamic control,[262] multistage rockets propelled by booster rockets before igniting a swarm of smaller rockets issuing forth from the end of the missile (shaped like a dragon's head),[263] and hand cannons that had up to ten barrels.[264]

Li Shizhen (1518–1593)—one of the most renowned pharmacologists and physicians in Chinese history—belonged to the late Ming period. In 1587, he completed the first draft of his Bencao Gangmu, which detailed the usage of over 1,800 medicinal drugs. Although it purportedly was invented by a Daoist hermit from Mount Emei in the late 10th century, the process of inoculation for smallpox patients was in widespread use in China by the reign of the Longqing Emperor (r. 1567–1572), long before it was applied anywhere else.[265] In regards to oral hygiene, the ancient Egyptians had a primitive toothbrush of a twig frayed at the end, but the Chinese were the first to invent the modern bristle toothbrush in 1498, although it used stiff pig hair.[266]

Population

Appreciating Plums, by Chen Hongshou (1598 - 1652) showing a lady holding an oval fan whilst enjoying the beauty of the plum.

Sinologist historians still debate the actual population figures for each era in the Ming Dynasty. The historian Timothy Brook notes that the Ming government census figures are dubious since fiscal obligations prompted many families to underreport the number of people in their households and many county officials to underreport the number of households in their jurisdiction.[267] Children were often underreported, especially female children, as shown by skewed population statistics throughout the Ming.[268] Even adult women were underreported;[269] for example, the Daming Prefecture in North Zhili reported a population of 378,167 males and 226,982 females in 1502.[58] The government attempted to revise the census figures using estimates of the expected average number of people in each household, but this did not solve the widespread problem of tax registration.[270]

The number of people counted in the census of 1381 was 59,873,305; however, this number dropped significantly when the government found that some 3 million people were missing from the tax census of 1391.[271] Even though underreporting figures was made a capital crime in 1381, the need for survival pushed many to abandon the tax registration and wander from their region, where Hongwu had attempted to impose rigid immobility on the populace.[272] The government tried to mitigate this by creating their own conservative estimate of 60,545,812 people in 1393.[272] In his Studies on the Population of China, Ho Ping-ti suggests revising the 1393 census to 65 million people, noting that large areas of North China and frontier areas were not counted in that census.[273] Brook states that the population figures gathered in the official censuses after 1393 ranged between 51 and 62 million, while the population was in fact increasing.[272] Even the Hongzhi Emperor (r. 1487–1505) remarked that the daily increase in subjects coincided with the daily dwindling amount of registered civilians and soldiers.[230] William Atwell states that around 1400 the population of China was perhaps 90 million people, citing Heijdra and Mote.[274]

The Xuande Emperor, (r. 1425–1435); he stated in 1428 that his populace was dwindling due to palace construction and military adventures, but in fact the population was rising under him, a fact noted by Zhou Chen—Governor of South Zhili—in his 1432 report to the throne about widespread itinerant commerce.[272]

Historians are now turning to local gazetteers of Ming China for clues that would show consistent growth in population.[268] Using the gazetteers, Brook estimates that the overall population under the Chenghua Emperor (r. 1464–1487) was roughly 75 million,[270] despite mid-Ming census figures hovering around 62 million.[230] While prefectures across the empire in the mid-Ming period were reporting either a drop in or stagnant population size, local gazetteers reported massive amounts of incoming vagrant workers with not enough good cultivated land for them to till, so that many would become drifters, conmen, or wood-cutters that contributed to deforestation.[275] The Hongzhi and Zhengde emperors lessened the penalties against those who had fled their home region, while the Jiajing Emperor (r. 1521–1567) finally had officials register migrants wherever they had moved or fled in order to bring in more revenues.[58]

Even with Jiajing's reforms to document migrant workers and merchants, by the late Ming era the government census still did not accurately reflect the enormous growth in population. Gazetteers across the empire noted this and made their own estimations of the overall population in the Ming, some guessing that the population had doubled, tripled, or even grown fivefold since 1368.[276] Fairbank estimates that the population was perhaps 160 million in the late Ming Dynasty,[277] while Brook estimates 175 million,[276] and Ebrey states perhaps as large as 200 million.[19] However, a great epidemic that entered China through the northwest in 1641 ravaged the densely populated areas along the Grand Canal; a gazatteer in northern Zhejiang noted more than half the population fell ill that year and that 90% of the local populace in one area was dead by 1642.[278]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Ebrey (2006), 271.
  2. ^ For the lower population estimate, see (Fairbank & Goldman 2006:128), for the higher estimate see (Ebrey 1999:197).
  3. ^ "The European Voyages of Exploration & The Ming Dynasty's Maritime History". The University of Calgary. Retrieved 2008-06-27.
  4. ^ a b Gascoigne, 150.
  5. ^ Ebrey (1999), 190–191.
  6. ^ a b c Gascoigne 151.
  7. ^ a b c Ebrey (1999), 191.
  8. ^ Wakeman, 207.
  9. ^ Andrew & Rapp, 25.
  10. ^ Fairbank, 129.
  11. ^ a b Fairbank, 134.
  12. ^ Ebrey (1999), 191–192.
  13. ^ a b c d Ebrey (1999), 192.
  14. ^ a b c Hucker, 13.
  15. ^ a b Ebrey (1999), 192–193.
  16. ^ Fairbank, 130.
  17. ^ Fairbank, 129–130.
  18. ^ a b c Ebrey (1999), 195.
  19. ^ a b c Ebrey (1999), 197.
  20. ^ Information Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, Testimony of History, 73.
  21. ^ Wang Jiawei & Nyima Gyaincain, The Historical Status of China's Tibet (China Intercontinental Press, 1997), 39–41.
  22. ^ Mingshi-Geography I «明史•地理一»: 東起朝鮮,西據吐番,南包安南,北距大磧。; Geography III «明史•地理三»: 七年七月置西安行都衛於此,領河州、朵甘、烏斯藏、三衛。; Western territory III «明史•列傳第二百十七西域三»
  23. ^ a b c d Wylie, 470.
  24. ^ Wang & Nyima, 1–40.
  25. ^ Laird, 106–107.
  26. ^ Hoffman, 65.
  27. ^ Wang & Nyima, 37.
  28. ^ Goldstein, 4–5.
  29. ^ Norbu, 52.
  30. ^ Kolmas, 32.
  31. ^ Wang & Nyima, 39–40.
  32. ^ Sperling, 474–475, 478.
  33. ^ Perdue, 273.
  34. ^ Kolmas, 28–29.
  35. ^ Laird, 131
  36. ^ Kolmas, 29.
  37. ^ Chan, 262.
  38. ^ Norbu, 58.
  39. ^ a b c Laird, 137.
  40. ^ Wang & Nyima, 42.
  41. ^ Dreyfus, 504.
  42. ^ Langlois, 139 & 161.
  43. ^ Geiss, 417–418.
  44. ^ Ebrey (1999), 227.
  45. ^ Wang & Nyima, 38.
  46. ^ Kolmas, 30–31.
  47. ^ Goldstein, 8.
  48. ^ Laird, 143–144.
  49. ^ The Ming Biographical History Project of the Association for Asian Studies, Dictionary of Ming Biography, 23.
  50. ^ Kolmas, 34–35.
  51. ^ Goldstein, 6–9.
  52. ^ Laird, 152.
  53. ^ Brook, 19.
  54. ^ Brook, 30–32.
  55. ^ Brook, 28–29.
  56. ^ a b Brook, 65–67.
  57. ^ Brook, 27–28, 94–95.
  58. ^ a b c Brook, 97.
  59. ^ Brook, 85, 146, 154.
  60. ^ Brook, 136–137.
  61. ^ Brook, 69.
  62. ^ Brook, 65–66, 112–113.
  63. ^ Brook, 113–117.
  64. ^ Brook, 124–125.
  65. ^ a b Brook, 144–145.
  66. ^ Brook, 128, 144.
  67. ^ Brook, 7.
  68. ^ Brook, 73.
  69. ^ Brook, 6–7, 90–91.
  70. ^ Brook, 90–93.
  71. ^ Brook, 90–93, 129–130, 151.
  72. ^ Brook, 128–129, 134–138.
  73. ^ Gernet, 60–61, 68–69.
  74. ^ Brook, 161.
  75. ^ Brook, 10, 49–51, 56.
  76. ^ Brook, 40–43.
  77. ^ Brook, 10, 118–119.
  78. ^ a b c d e f g Hucker, 25.
  79. ^ Brook, 102.
  80. ^ a b Brook, 108.
  81. ^ Brook, 68–69, 81–83.
  82. ^ Fairbank, 134–135.
  83. ^ Brook, xx.
  84. ^ Brook, xxi, 89.
  85. ^ Robinson (2000), 527.
  86. ^ Atwell (2002), 84.
  87. ^ a b c d Ebrey (2006), 272.
  88. ^ a b c d e Ebrey (1999), 194.
  89. ^ Brook, 46–47.
  90. ^ Brook, 47.
  91. ^ Brook, 74–75.
  92. ^ a b Chang (2007), 66–67.
  93. ^ Fairbank, 137.
  94. ^ Fairbank, 137–138.
  95. ^ a b c Fairbank, 138.
  96. ^ a b c d e Fairbank, 139.
  97. ^ Robinson (1999), 80.
  98. ^ Fairbank, 138–139.
  99. ^ a b Ebrey (2006), 273.
  100. ^ Robinson (2000), 533–534.
  101. ^ Robinson (2000), 534.
  102. ^ Yingzong Shilu, 184.17b, 185.5b.
  103. ^ Robinson (1999), 85, footnote 18.
  104. ^ Robinson (1999), 83.
  105. ^ Robinson (1999), 84–85.
  106. ^ Robinson (1999), 96–97.
  107. ^ Robinson (1999), 79, 103–108.
  108. ^ Robinson (1999), 108.
  109. ^ Robinson (1999), 81.
  110. ^ Laird, 141.
  111. ^ Robinson (1999), 83, 101.
  112. ^ Ebrey (1999), 208.
  113. ^ a b c d Ebrey (1999), 211.
  114. ^ Ebrey (1999), 214.
  115. ^ a b c d e Brook, 124.
  116. ^ Pfoundes, 89.
  117. ^ Nowell, 8.
  118. ^ Mote et al., 339.
  119. ^ Mote et al., 337–338.
  120. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 369.
  121. ^ The Ming Biographical History Project of the Association for Asian Studies, 410–411.
  122. ^ Brook, 206.
  123. ^ Brook, 205–206.
  124. ^ a b Spence, 19–20.
  125. ^ a b c d Spence, 20.
  126. ^ Brook, 205.
  127. ^ Crosby, 198–201.
  128. ^ Gernet, 136.
  129. ^ Crosby, 200.
  130. ^ a b Hucker, 31.
  131. ^ a b c Spence, 16.
  132. ^ Ebrey (2006), 281–283.
  133. ^ Ebrey (1999), 203–206, 213.
  134. ^ a b Ebrey (1999), 194–195.
  135. ^ a b c d Spence, 17.
  136. ^ a b Hucker, 11.
  137. ^ Spence, 17–18.
  138. ^ Spence, 19.
  139. ^ Brook, 208.
  140. ^ Brook, 289.
  141. ^ Spence, 20–21.
  142. ^ a b c Spence, 21.
  143. ^ Spence, 22–24.
  144. ^ a b Spence, 27.
  145. ^ a b c Spence, 24.
  146. ^ Spence, 24–25.
  147. ^ Spence, 28.
  148. ^ a b Chang (2007), 92.
  149. ^ a b Spence, 31.
  150. ^ Spence, 21–22.
  151. ^ a b Spence, 22.
  152. ^ a b c Spence, 25.
  153. ^ Spence, 32–33.
  154. ^ a b c d Spence, 33.
  155. ^ Spence, 34–35.
  156. ^ Yuan, 193–194.
  157. ^ Hartwell, 397–398.
  158. ^ a b c Hucker, 5.
  159. ^ a b Hucker, 28.
  160. ^ Chang (2007), 15, footnote 42.
  161. ^ a b c d Chang (2007), 16.
  162. ^ a b c d Hucker, 16.
  163. ^ a b Hucker, 23.
  164. ^ Hucker, 29–30.
  165. ^ Hucker, 30.
  166. ^ Hucker, 31–32.
  167. ^ Hucker, 32.
  168. ^ Hucker, 33.
  169. ^ Hucker, 33–35.
  170. ^ Hucker, 35.
  171. ^ a b Hucker, 36.
  172. ^ a b c d Hucker, 24.
  173. ^ Hucker, 25–26.
  174. ^ a b c Hucker, 26.
  175. ^ a b Hucker, 12.
  176. ^ Ebrey (2006), 96.
  177. ^ Ebrey (1999), 145–146.
  178. ^ a b c Ebrey (1999), 199.
  179. ^ a b Ebrey (1999), 198–199.
  180. ^ Ebrey (1999), 201–202.
  181. ^ Ebrey (1999), 202.
  182. ^ Ebrey (1999), 200.
  183. ^ a b Ebrey (1999), 198.
  184. ^ Hucker, 11–12.
  185. ^ a b Hucker, 14.
  186. ^ Brook, xxv.
  187. ^ Hucker, 15–16.
  188. ^ a b Hucker, 17.
  189. ^ a b c d Hucker, 18.
  190. ^ Hucker, 18–19.
  191. ^ Hucker, 24–25.
  192. ^ Hucker, 8.
  193. ^ a b Hucker, 19.
  194. ^ Fairbank, 109–112.
  195. ^ Hucker, 19–20.
  196. ^ Robinson (1999), 116–117.
  197. ^ a b c Spence, 10.
  198. ^ Brook, 224–225.
  199. ^ Brook, 225.
  200. ^ Brook, 225–226.
  201. ^ Needham, Volume 3, 524.
  202. ^ Hargett, 69.
  203. ^ Brook, xxi.
  204. ^ Brook, 215–217.
  205. ^ Ebrey (2006), 104–105.
  206. ^ Ebrey (1999), 202–203.
  207. ^ Chang (2007), 318–319.
  208. ^ a b Chang, 319.
  209. ^ a b Chang (2007), 318.
  210. ^ Brook, 229–231.
  211. ^ a b c Ebrey (1999), 201.
  212. ^ Brook, 206.
  213. ^ a b Ebrey (1999), 212.
  214. ^ Wong, 30–32.
  215. ^ White, Volume 1, 31–38.
  216. ^ Lipman, 39.
  217. ^ a b c d e f Ebrey (2006), 282.
  218. ^ Ebrey (2006), 281.
  219. ^ a b Ebrey (2006), 281–282.
  220. ^ Ebrey (2006), 283.
  221. ^ Ebrey (1999), 158.
  222. ^ Brook, 230.
  223. ^ a b c Ebrey (1999), 213.
  224. ^ a b Ebrey (1999), 206.
  225. ^ a b c d e Spence, 13.
  226. ^ a b Spence, 12–13.
  227. ^ Brook, 229 & 232.
  228. ^ Brook, 232–233.
  229. ^ Schafer (1956), 57.
  230. ^ a b c Brook, 95.
  231. ^ Spence, 14.
  232. ^ Needham, Volume 3, 444–445.
  233. ^ Needham, Volume 3, 444–447.
  234. ^ Wong, 31 (footnote 1).
  235. ^ Needham, Volume 3, 110.
  236. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 255–257.
  237. ^ a b Kuttner (1975), 166.
  238. ^ a b c d Engelfriet (1998), 78.
  239. ^ Kuttner (1975), 166–167.
  240. ^ a b Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 133 & 508.
  241. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 438.
  242. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 509.
  243. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 511.
  244. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 510–511.
  245. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 276.
  246. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 274–276.
  247. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 2, 171–172.
  248. ^ Song, 7–30, 84–103.
  249. ^ Song, 171–172, 189, 196.
  250. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 3, 668
  251. ^ Needham, Volume 4, Part 3, 634, 649–650, 668–669.
  252. ^ Song, 36–56.
  253. ^ Song, 237, 190.
  254. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 126.
  255. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 205, 339 F.
  256. ^ Needham, Volume 6, Part 2, 65–66.
  257. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 372.
  258. ^ Needam, Volume 5, Part 7, 24–25.
  259. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 264.
  260. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 203–205.
  261. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 205.
  262. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 498–502.
  263. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 508.
  264. ^ Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 229.
  265. ^ Temple (1986), 137.
  266. ^ "Who invented the toothbrush and when was it invented?". The Library of Congress. 2007-04-04. Retrieved 2008-08-18.
  267. ^ Brook, 27.
  268. ^ a b Brook, 267.
  269. ^ Brook, 97–99.
  270. ^ a b Brook, 28, 267.
  271. ^ Brook, 27–28.
  272. ^ a b c d Brook, 28.
  273. ^ Ho, 8–9, 22, 259.
  274. ^ Atwell (2002), 86.
  275. ^ Brook, 94–96.
  276. ^ a b Brook, 162.
  277. ^ Fairbank, 128.
  278. ^ Brook, 163.

References

  • Information Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China (2002). Testimony of History. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.
  • The Ming Biographical History Project of the Association for Asian Studies. (1976). Dictionary of Ming Biography, 1368-1644: 明代名人傳: Volume 1, A-L. Edited by L. Carrington Goodrich and Chaoying Fang. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0231038011.
  • Andrew, Anita N. and John A. Rapp. (2000). Autocracy and China's Rebel Founding Emperors: Comparing Chairman Mao and Ming Taizu. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. ISBN 0847695808.
  • Atwell, William S. "Time, Money, and the Weather: Ming China and the "Great Depression" of the Mid-Fifteenth Century," The Journal of Asian Studies (Volume 61, Number 1, 2002): 83–113.
  • Brook, Timothy. (1998). The Confusions of Pleasure: Commerce and Culture in Ming China. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-22154-0 (Paperback).
  • Chan, Hok-Lam. (1988). "The Chien-wen, Yung-lo, Hung-shi, and Hsuan-te reigns," in The Cambridge History of China: Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, 182–384, edited by Denis Twitchett and John K. Fairbank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521243327.
  • Chang, Michael G. (2007). A Court on Horseback: Imperial Touring & the Construction of Qing Rule, 1680–1785. Cambridge: Published by Harvard University Asia Center; distributed by Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-02454-0.
  • Crosby, Alfred W., Jr. (2003). The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492; 30th Anniversary Edition. Westport: Praeger Publishers. ISBN 0-275-98092-8.
  • Dreyfus, Georges. (2003). "Cherished memories, cherished communities: proto-nationalism in Tibet," in The History of Tibet: Volume 2, The Medieval Period: c. AD 850–1895, the Development of Buddhist Paramountcy, 492–522, ed. Alex McKay. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415308429.
  • Ebrey, Patricia Buckley, Anne Walthall, James B. Palais. (2006). East Asia: A Cultural, Social, and Political History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 0-618-13384-4.
  • Ebrey, Patricia Buckley (1999). The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-66991-X
  • Engelfriet, Peter M. (1998). Euclid in China: The Genesis of the First Translation of Euclid's Elements in 1607 & Its Reception Up to 1723. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill. ISBN 9004109447.
  • Fairbank, John King & Goldman, Merle (2006). China: A New History; Second Enlarged Edition. ISBN 0-674-01828-1
  • Gascoigne, Bamber. (2003). The Dynasties of China: A History. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers. ISBN 0-7867-1219-8 (Paperback).
  • Geiss, James. (1988). "The Cheng-te reign, 1506-1521," in The Cambridge History of China: Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, 403–439, edited by Denis Twitchett and John K. Fairbank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521243327.
  • Gernet, Jacques (1962). Daily Life in China on the Eve of the Mongol Invasion, 1250-1276. Translated by H. M. Wright. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-0720-0
  • Goldstein, Melvyn C. (1997). The Snow Lion and the Dragon: China, Tibet and the Dalai Lama. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0520219511.
  • Hargett, James M. "Some Preliminary Remarks on the Travel Records of the Song Dynasty (960-1279)," Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR) (July 1985): 67-93.
  • Hartwell, Robert M. "Demographic, Political, and Social Transformations of China, 750-1550," Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies (Volume 42, Number 2, 1982): 365–442.
  • Ho, Ping-ti. (1959). Studies on the Population of China: 1368–1953. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Hoffman, Helmut. (2003). "Early and Medieval Tibet" in The History of Tibet: Volume 1, The Early Period to c. AD 850, the Yarlung Dynasty, 45–69, ed. Alex McKay. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415308429.
  • Hucker, Charles O. "Governmental Organization of The Ming Dynasty," Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies (Volume 21, December 1958): 1–66.
  • Kolmaš, Josef. (1967). Tibet and Imperial China: A Survey of Sino-Tibetan Relations Up to the End of the Manchu Dynasty in 1912: Occasional Paper 7. Canberra: The Australian National University, Centre of Oriental Studies.
  • Kuttner, Fritz A. "Prince Chu Tsai-Yü's Life and Work: A Re-Evaluation of His Contribution to Equal Temperament Theory," Ethnomusicology, Vol. 19, No. 2 (May, 1975): 163-206.
  • Laird, Thomas. (2006). The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama. New York: Grove Press. ISBN 978-0-8021-827-1.
  • Langlois, John D., Jr. (1988). "The Hung-wu reign, 1368–1398," in The Cambridge History of China: Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, 107–181, edited by Denis Twitchett and John K. Fairbank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521243327.
  • Lipman, Jonathan. Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 1998.
  • Mote, Frederick W. and Denis Twitchett. (1998). The Cambridge History of China; Volume 7–8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-24333-5 (Hardback edition).
  • Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd.
  • Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 4, Physics and Physical Technology, Part 2, Mechanical Engineering. Taipei: Caves Books Ltd.
  • Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 4, Physics and Physical Technology, Part 3, Civil Engineering and Nautics. Taipei: Caves Books Ltd.
  • Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 5, Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Part 7, Military Technology; the Gunpowder Epic. Taipei: Caves Books Ltd.
  • Needham, Joseph (1986). Science and Civilization in China: Volume 6, Biology and Biological Technology, Part 2: Agriculture. Taipei: Caves Books, Ltd.
  • Norbu, Dawa. (2001). China's Tibet Policy. Richmond: Curzon. ISBN 0700704744.
  • Nowell, Charles E. "The Discovery of the Pacific: A Suggested Change of Approach," The Pacific Historical Review (Volume XVI, Number 1; February, 1947): 1–10.
  • Perdue, Peter C. (2000). "Culture, History, and Imperial Chinese Strategy: Legacies of the Qing Conquests," in Warfare in Chinese History, 252–287, edited by Hans van de Ven. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill. ISBN 9004117741.
  • Pfoundes, C. "Notes on the History of Eastern Adventure, Exploration, and Discovery, and Foreign Intercourse with Japan," Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (Volume X; 1882): 82–92.
  • Robinson, David M. "Banditry and the Subversion of State Authority in China: The Capital Region during the Middle Ming Period (1450-1525)," Journal of Social History (Spring 2000): 527–563.
  • Robinson, David M. "Politics, Force and Ethnicity in Ming China: Mongols and the Abortive Coup of 1461," Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies (Volume 59, Number 1, June 1999): 79–123.
  • Schafer, Edward H. "The Development of Bathing Customs in Ancient and Medieval China and the History of the Floriate Clear Palace," Journal of the American Oriental Society (Volume 76, Number 2, 1956): 57–82.
  • Song, Yingxing, translated with preface by E-Tu Zen Sun and Shiou-Chuan Sun (1966). T'ien-Kung K'ai-Wu: Chinese Technology in the Seventeenth Century. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Spence, Jonathan D. (1999). The Search For Modern China; Second Edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-97351-4 (Paperback).
  • Sperling, Elliot. (2003). "The 5th Karma-pa and some aspects of the relationship between Tibet and the Early Ming," in The History of Tibet: Volume 2, The Medieval Period: c. AD 850–1895, the Development of Buddhist Paramountcy, 473–482, ed. Alex McKay. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415308429.
  • Temple, Robert. (1986). The Genius of China: 3,000 Years of Science, Discovery, and Invention. With a forward by Joseph Needham. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc. ISBN 0671620282.
  • Wakeman, Frederick, Jr. "Rebellion and Revolution: The Study of Popular Movements in Chinese History," The Journal of Asian Studies (1977): 201–237.
  • Wang, Jiawei and Nyima Gyaincain. (1997). The Historical Status of China's Tibet. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press. ISBN 7801133048.
  • Weidner, Marsha. (2001). "Imperial Engagements with Buddhist Art and Architecture: Ming Variations of an Old Theme," in Cultural Intersections in Later Chinese Buddhism, 117–144, edited by Marsha Weidner. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 0824823087.
  • White, William Charles. (1966). The Chinese Jews (Vol. 1-3). New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corporation.
  • Wong, H.C. "China's Opposition to Western Science during Late Ming and Early Ch'ing," Isis (Volume 54, Number 1, 1963): 29–49.
  • Wylie, Turrell V. (2003). "Lama Tribute in the Ming Dynasty" in The History of Tibet: Volume 2, The Medieval Period: c. AD 850–1895, the Development of Buddhist Paramountcy, ed. Alex McKay. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415308429.
  • Yuan, Zheng. "Local Government Schools in Sung China: A Reassessment," History of Education Quarterly (Volume 34, Number 2; Summer 1994): 193–213.

Further reading

  • Huang, Ray. (1982). 1587, A Year of No Significance: The Ming Dynasty in Decline. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Source for "Fall of the Ming Dynasty":- Dupuy and Dupuy's "Collins Encyclopedia of Military History"

External links

Preceded by Dynasties in Chinese history
1368–1644
Succeeded by

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA