Steep stretch
A steep section is a steeply inclined section of a railway line that is only used in accordance with the steep section regulations with special safety precautions by specially approved traction vehicles in friction mode (→ adhesion track ).
Concept and delimitation

In Germany, main lines with a decisive incline of more than 1:40 (25 ‰) and secondary lines with an incline of 1:25 (40 ‰) are considered steep sections. For routes with a decisive incline of more than 40 ‰, the steep section regulations or comparable guidelines apply . For cog railways that are not steep grades, by definition, different rules apply. The slope is calculated using the gradient .
The locomotives of trains traveling on a steep stretch must be "suitable for steep stretches", which means they must be equipped with special equipment. If the incline of the route exceeds an upper limit, economical and safe friction operation is no longer possible, so that the transmission of tractive and braking forces is either reinforced by special measures (formerly Fell's system , new linear motor booster) or from adhesion to gear operation must be passed over. Where exactly this limit is to be set depends on a large number of factors. Newer design traction vehicles are able to cope with greater inclines than older rolling stock, so that existing rack and pinion railways can be converted into steep sections with adhesion operation in individual cases (e.g. St. Gallen – Appenzell line ).

The Swiss railway law does not recognize the term steep section. Sections of the route for which special regulations apply due to the gradient and its length are referred to as steep gradients . Electric traction vehicles driving down a steep category A gradient require an electric brake . With category B, a minimum braking ratio of 75% is required without an electric brake and the total weight of the braked wagons must be at least as large as that of all traction vehicles . In the case of narrow-gauge routes, the incline is normally limited to 40 ‰. Greater inclinations are only permitted in special circumstances under certain conditions. For trams , the maximum limit is 70 ‰ and must not be exceeded in any case on new lines. Locomotives on normal and narrow-gauge lines with an incline of more than 60 ‰ require a magnetic rail brake or an eddy current rail brake .
Safety precautions
Braking devices
For the approval of a traction vehicle for steep sections are i. d. Usually three independently acting brake systems are required. Locomotives suitable for steep sections therefore have special braking equipment: in the case of steam locomotives this is usually the Riggenbach counter-pressure brake , in the case of combustion locomotives an engine brake or a hydrodynamic brake and in the case of electric locomotives a resistance brake or a recuperation brake .
Operating rules

Only specially trained personnel may be used on routes that are operated in accordance with the steep section regulations. There are special features during the brake test, the brake calculation and when carrying out construction work on the steep section.
For individual routes, further safety precautions are or were necessary, e.g. B. that the locomotive always has to stand on the valley side and the uphill trains are pushed; With steam locomotives it was mandatory in many places to drive uphill with the chimney so that the fire box was always washed by the water. On some routes, an additional inspection of the braking system of the vehicles used was also common.
When driving downhill in Switzerland, if the electric brake of the locomotive is insufficient to maintain the speed, the sawtooth method is used. The automatic air brake is initially used to brake strongly for 60 seconds, then the brake is released for at least 90 seconds. When the permitted speed is reached, another 60-second braking is triggered. This prevents thermal overloading of the brakes and exhaustion of the brakes .
historical development
Main lines
The system of inclined planes widespread in Great Britain , in which the wagons were pulled uphill with stationary steam engines, did not prevail in Germany, only the steep ramp Erkrath-Hochdahl and the Ronheider ramp were built, both of which were switched to normal operation after a few years Locomotives moved. At Neuenmarkt , an inclined plane was also planned for operation with stationary steam engines, but was not implemented. Instead, a ramp was built with an even slope. The trains were given lead by special machines and therefore did not have to be divided despite the incline. In the following years, similar systems were built on other main lines. Because of the complex operational management, attempts were made to get by with as few ramps as possible within the framework of the topographical situation and worked in the rest of the route network with significantly lower inclines. In later railway constructions - for the first time with the Black Forest Railway - the routes were artificially lengthened with loops and spiral tunnels, thus enabling inclines that could be mastered without the laborious ramp operation.
At the foot of the ramps, train stations were built with special tracks for attaching the push locomotives and for setting the brake cars, which were required before the introduction of the air brake, into the trains. Locomotive stations or railway depots were built at the same location to supply the locomotives before the ascent . These stations were built according to operational requirements, often in previously insignificant villages, which over the years have become railroad towns with excellent transport connections, because express trains also had to stop for the pushing locomotive.
The operational difficulties and the restriction of the passability of the steep sections led to a double-track expansion early on. Technical innovations led to further increases in capacity. Telegraphy and route blocks and the construction of block posts were milestones in this development in the 19th century. In the 20th century, with the spread of the air brake, the train lengths could be increased significantly. Before the First World War, special locomotives were built in Prussia with the T 20 and in Bavaria with the Gt 2 × 4/4, especially for use on the Frankenwaldbahn and the Spessart ramp, which could cope with the increased demands in push service. Both series were taken over by the Deutsche Reichsbahn as series 95 and series 96 .
At the end of the 1930s, high-speed railcars operated for the first time, which could run over the steep section without time-consuming pushing, and the electrification of the ramps began before the Second World War.
Since the electrical operation offered enormous advantages, electrification was accelerated soon after the end of the war. This had a lasting impact on the operation of the ramps. Passenger trains no longer needed push locomotives, drove without stopping over the ramp, and the electric locomotives were no longer stationed on site. As a result, the stations and depots in the area of the ramps lost much of their importance or disappeared completely. In the push service mostly locomotives of the series E 93 ( 193 ), E 94 ( 194 ) and later E 50 ( 150 ) were to be found. With the use of modern interlocking technology, a further increase in capacity could be achieved. Today the needs of passenger and freight traffic are developing in different directions. In freight traffic, there is a tendency today to abandon ramp operations and replace them with new routes with long base tunnels or to route trains over other routes.
The Höllentalbahn from Freiburg im Breisgau to Neustadt in the Black Forest went through a special development . It was built as a branch line with cogwheel operation between Hirschsprung and Hinterzarten. In the course of the extension to Donaueschingen, the railway was operated as a full line from 1902 . This made the Höllentalbahn the steepest main railway in Germany. Initially, this mainly had operational effects. It was not until the following decades that the railway was expanded and sections of it were re-routed. The cogwheel operation was replaced by the DR class 85 locomotives specially designed for this route, followed a few years later by experimental electrification with 20 kV / 50 Hz. After the end of the test operation, the route was converted to 15 kV / 16 2/3 Hz .
Branch lines
Developments were different for branch lines. In the beginning there were only a few steep sections. On the one hand, larger inclines were permitted here from the start, on the other hand, the construction of switchbacks was not as big an obstacle as with main railways and at the low speeds the restrictions of the cogwheel operation were not as significant. In the 1920s, the Deutsche Reichsbahn gave up cogwheel operation on many routes and switched the routes to friction operation, which simplified operation, reduced costs and allowed higher travel speeds. The successor to the gear machines were mostly locomotives of the 94 5–17 series with counter-pressure brakes.
In the years after the Second World War, diesel locomotives and multiple units took over operation in both German states. At the Deutsche Bundesbahn, the specially equipped V 100 ( 213 series ), VT 98 ( 798 series ) and V 160 ( 218 ), while the 118 series locomotives took over this task at the Deutsche Reichsbahn . The Reichsbahn electrified the Rübelandbahn with 25 kV / 50 Hz in isolated operation and used locomotives of the E 251 series . The Murgtalbahn in Baden-Württemberg was also converted to light rail operation and also electrified.
After the steep ramps were only used sporadically for freight traffic after the Second World War, passenger traffic was maintained in comparison to other branch lines despite the low travel speeds on most routes until the 1990s. The German Bahn AG and other rail companies today still operate several steep slopes, among which are also steep ramps, which have no or only seasonal excursions.
Steep sections in Germany
Main tracks with a decisive incline over 25 ‰
- Freiburg im Breisgau – Hirschsprung – Hinterzarten – Titisee-Neustadt (Höllentalbahn), decisive incline 57.14 ‰
- City-S-Bahn Hamburg , 40 ‰
- High-speed route Cologne – Rhine / Main with the Cologne airport loop , 40.0 ‰
- 2. Main route of the Munich S-Bahn , 40 ‰ (planned)
- North ramp of the City-Tunnel Leipzig , 40 ‰
- New mountain skin tunnel of the Gäubahn , 39 ‰ - planned
- City-Tunnel Frankfurt , approx. 39 ‰
- Verbindungsbahn the S-Bahn Stuttgart , up to about 38 ‰
- Airport loop Frankfurt , approx. 36 ‰
- New line Wendlingen – Ulm , 35 ‰ in the station area and 31 ‰ in the high-speed section - planned
- Railway line Raunheim Mönchwald – Raunheim Mönchhof , 35 ‰
- Wuppertal-Vohwinkel-Essen-Überruhr , 35 ‰ in the area of the Essen-Kupferdreh stop
- Erkrath – Hochdahl , 33.3 ‰
- Track from Untertürkheim to Stuttgart Hauptbahnhof in the Obertürkheim tunnel , 33 ‰ - planned
- Main route of the Munich S-Bahn , 32 ‰
- Tunnel of the north-south mainline Berlin, 30 ‰
- Württemberg Black Forest Railway , 30 ‰ in Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen station
- Lichtenfels – Pressig-Rothenkirchen – Probstzella – Saalfeld (Frankenwaldbahn), 29 ‰
- Stuttgart-Rohr – Filderstadt railway line , 29 ‰ at Stuttgart Airport / Messe station
- Rohrer curve , 26.9 ‰ - planned
- New line Stuttgart – Wendlingen , approx. 26.55 ‰ - planned
- Aachen – Ronheide – Herbesthal (Ronheider ramp), 26.5 ‰
- Tharandt – Edle Krone – Klingenberg-Colmnitz , 25.6 ‰
- Neuenmarkt-Wirsberg – Marktschorgast (Inclined Plane), 25 ‰
Branch lines with a decisive incline over 40 ‰

- Suhl – Schleusingen (Friedbergbahn), 66.6 ‰ - without traffic
- Blankenburg – Elbingerode – Tanne (Rübelandbahn), 61.4 ‰
- Ilmenau – Schleusingen (Rennsteigbahn), 61.2 ‰
- Boppard – Buchholz – Emmelshausen (Hunsrück Railway), 60.9 ‰
- Herrnberg – Hirzenhain (Schelden Valley Railway), 60 ‰ - dismantled by 1993
- Linz – Kalenborn (Kasbachtalbahn), 55.9 ‰
- Freudenstadt – Baiersbronn – Rastatt (Murgtalbahn), 50.0 ‰
- Eibenstock unt Bf - Eibenstock ob Bf , 50.0 ‰ - abandoned in 1975 because of the construction of the Eibenstock dam
- Schönheide Süd – Carlsfeld , 50.0 ‰ - 750 mm narrow-gauge railway; Abandoned in 1967
- Oberzissen – Brenk – Engeln (Brohltalbahn), 50.0 ‰ - narrow-gauge railway 1000 mm
- Krombach-Fürstenhagen , 50.0 ‰, dismantled after 1947
- Freilassing – Bad Reichenhall – Berchtesgaden , 40.8 ‰
Factory and industrial railways
- Steinbacher Bergwerksbahn (narrow gauge 600 mm), 83.3 ‰ - closed
- Feldbahn Brotterode – Wernshausen (narrow gauge 600 mm), 80 ‰ - closed
Steep sections in Austria
- Linz - Pöstlingberg ( Pöstlingbergbahn ), maximum incline 116 ‰ - steepest adhesion railway
- Leoben - Hieflau ( Erzbergbahn ), 71 ‰
- Rottenegg - Lacken ( Mühlkreisbahn ), 46 ‰, "Saurüsselgraben"
- Innsbruck - Mittenwald - Garmisch-Partenkirchen ( Mittenwaldbahn ), 38 ‰
- Garmisch-Partenkirchen - Reutte in Tirol - Kempten (Allgäu) ( Ausserfernbahn ), 37.5 ‰
- Innsbruck - Bludenz ( Arlbergbahn ), 31 ‰
- Schwarzach - St. Veit - Spittal - Millstätter See ( Tauernbahn ), 28 ‰
- Vienna Liesing - Kaltenleutzüge ( Kaltenleutgenz Railway ), 27 ‰
- Gloggnitz - Mürzzuschlag ( Semmering Railway ), 28 ‰
- Innsbruck - Verona ( Brennerbahn ), 25 ‰
Stretches with steep gradients in Switzerland
Standard gauge lines with steep gradients

Routes with limited network access :
Route section | train | customized imaging gradient |
Height under- difference |
length | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Uetliberg – Zurich Selnau | SZU | 79 ‰ | 415 m | 9.1 km | Direct current , steepest standard-gauge adhesion railway in Europe |
Routes with free network access:
Route section | train | cate- gory |
customized imaging gradient |
Height under- difference |
length | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Le Pont-Le Day | SBB | A. | 38 ‰ | 231 m | 8.2 km |
|
|
Iselle – Domodossola | 25 ‰ | 360 m | 18.8 km | Transport service by SBB | |||
Puidoux-Chexbres-Vevey | 38 ‰ | 232 m | 7.8 km | ||||
(La Chaux-de-Fonds–) km 25.8 – Vauseyon | 27 ‰ | 572 m | 24.2 km | ||||
Bure – Courtemaîche | 45 ‰ | 73 m | 4.7 km | Connection weapon place | |||
Göschenen-Erstfeld | 26 ‰ | 634 m | 28.8 km | Gotthard north ramp | |||
Airolo – Bodio | 26 ‰ | 811 m | 39.3 km | Gotthard south ramp | |||
Rivera-Bironico-Giubiasco | 26 ‰ | 242 m | 11.3 km | Ceneri north ramp | |||
Reuchenette-Péry – Biel / Bienne | B. | 25 ‰ | 159 m | 8.2 km | |||
Court-Moutier | 27 ‰ | 137 m | 6.4 km | ||||
Läufelfingen – Sissach | 21 ‰ | 183 m | 9.7 km | Hauenstein north ramp | |||
Läufelfingen – Olten | 26 ‰ | 163 m | 8.5 km | Hauenstein south ramp | |||
St. Gallen St. Fiden – Rorschach | 21 ‰ | 247 m | 13.0 km | ||||
Wattwil – Uznach | 20 ‰ | 204 m | 14.0 km | Rickentunnel | |||
Gibswil-Rüti ZH | 30 ‰ | 275 m | 11.4 km | Tösstalbahn | |||
Kandersteg – Frutigen | BLS | A. | 27 ‰ | 396 m | 18.0 km | Lötschberg north ramp |
|
Goppenstein-Brig | 27 ‰ | 538 m | 25.0 km | Lötschberg south ramp | |||
Schwarzenburg – Bern Fischermätteli | B. | 35 ‰ | 241 m | 8.0 km | |||
Gänsbrunnen – Moutier | 25 ‰ | 190 m | 8.5 km | Weissenstein north ramp | |||
Oberdorf SO – Solothurn West | 28 ‰ | 222 m | 9.6 km | Weissenstein south ramp | |||
Altmatt – Freienbach SOB | SOB | A. | 50 ‰ | 413 m | 11.3 km |
|
|
Rothenthurm-Arth-Goldau | 50 ‰ | 506 m | 10.4 km | ||||
Biberbrugg – Wädenswil | 50 ‰ | 421 m | 9.9 km | ||||
Le Châble-Sembrancher-Martigny | TMR | 35 ‰ | 353 m | 19.3 km | Y segment | ||
Orsières – Sembrancher – Martigny | 40 ‰ | 371 m | 19.2 km | ||||
Sâles – Romont | TPF | 26 ‰ | 129 m | 10.4 km | West ramp | ||
Sâles – Bull | 28 ‰ | 65 m | 7.7 km | East ramp | |||
Friborg – Murten | 29 ‰ | 181 m | 22.2 km |
The Zurich Altstetten – Oerlikon diameter line and the Seetalbahn are not classified as steep inclines, despite gradients of 40 and 38 ‰, respectively, because their descents are only short.
List of narrow-gauge lines with a gradient of over 40 ‰



In the case of mixed adhesion and gear operation , the greatest slope is indicated on the adhesion section.
More steep sections

- Saint-Gervais – Vallorcine (France; narrow-gauge railway), maximum gradient 90 ‰
- Hakone –Gora ( Hakone-Tozan Line , Japan ), 80 ‰
- Yokokawa– Karuizawa ( Usui Pass ) ( Shin'etsu Main Line , Japan), 66.7 ‰ - closed in 1997
- Cosenza - San Giovanni in Fiore (Italy; narrow-gauge railway), 60 ‰
- Myrdal - Flåm ( Flåms Railway , Norway ), 55 ‰
- Schlackenwerth – Joachimsthal ( Czech Republic ), 50 ‰ - closed
- (Pau–) Bedous – Canfranc ( France ), 43 ‰ - out of service, re-commissioning planned
See also
Web links
- Steep section regulations of DB Netz AG (PDF; 570 kB)
Individual evidence
- ↑ Swiss Driving Regulations (FDV) A2016 Federal Office of Transport (FOT), July 1, 2016 (PDF; 3 MB). R 300.5, Section 3.6 Heavy gradients and large or long gradients
- ↑ SBB Traffic Operating Regulations [5.4b] Heavy gradients. Document number 20004522, July 1, 2012.
- ↑ Implementing provisions for the Railway Ordinance (AB-EBV) DETEC , July 1, 2016 (PDF; 3 MB). AB 17 point 7.2 Longitudinal inclination in train tracks
- ↑ Implementing provisions for the Railway Ordinance (AB-EBV) DETEC , July 1, 2016 (PDF; 3 MB). From 52.1 point 9 braking systems
- ↑ Swiss Driving Regulations (FDV) A2016 Federal Office of Transport (FOT), July 1, 2016 (PDF; 3 MB). R 300.14, Section 2.7.2 Operating the automatic compressed air brake on standard gauge trains on steep slopes
- ↑ http://www.gessen.de/str/acliege.html
- ↑ Network access SZU. On the SZU website (with a link to the infrastructure catalog), accessed on February 10, 2018
- ↑ a b rail infrastructure. On the SBB website (with a link to the SBB route database), accessed on February 10, 2018
- ↑ a b c Bruno Lämmli: Arrange the routes geographically. At www.lokifahrer.ch, accessed on February 10, 2018
- ↑ Services for railway companies. On the BLS website (with a link to the route database), accessed on February 10, 2018
- ↑ Access to the infrastructure of the SOB. On the SOB website (with a link to the Network Statement, which contains a route database in the appendix), accessed on February 10, 2018
- ↑ a b The website of the railway company does not allow access to the route data.
- ↑ Hans G. Wägli: Track Profile Switzerland CH +. 2010, pp. 24-25
- ↑ Hans G. Wägli: Track Profile Switzerland CH +. 2010, pp. 42-43
- ^ Stefan Breitenmoser: Blasting on urban area. In: Baublatt, No. 42, Friday, October 21, 2016 ( Memento from October 19, 2017 in the Internet Archive )