Ann Coulter: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 137: Line 137:
Even though this error was corrected in later printings of this books, liberals continued to use it to smear Coulter.
Even though this error was corrected in later printings of this books, liberals continued to use it to smear Coulter.


Coulter was finally forced to respond to these attacks after an especially vitriolic attack by [[Al Franken]] in his 2003 book [[Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them]]. He singled out this relatively minor error in an obvious attenpt to discredit Coulter, even though the book contained no less than 780 separate [[citations|footnotes]]. She said, "In my three best-selling books — making the case for a[[Bill Clinton| president's]] impeachment, accusing liberals of systematic lying and [[propaganda|propagandizing]], arguing that Joe McCarthy was a great American patriot, and detailing 50 years of treachery by the Democratic Party — this is the only vaguely substantive error the Ann Coulter hysterics have been able to produce, corrected soon after publication. CONGRATULATIONS, LIBERALS!!!" She added, "At least I didn't miss the [[Ukrainian famine]](cf., Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times reporter [[Walter Duranty]])", (who did just that).<ref name="answering"/> {{Fact|date=November 2007}}
Coulter was finally forced to respond to these attacks after an especially vitriolic attack by [[Al Franken]] in his 2003 book [[Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them]]. He singled out this relatively minor error in an blatantly tendentious attempt to discredit Coulter, even though the book contained no less than 780 separate [[citations|footnotes]]. She said, "In my three best-selling books — making the case for a[[Bill Clinton| president's]] impeachment, accusing liberals of systematic lying and [[propaganda|propagandizing]], arguing that Joe McCarthy was a great American patriot, and detailing 50 years of treachery by the Democratic Party — this is the only vaguely substantive error the Ann Coulter hysterics have been able to produce, corrected soon after publication. CONGRATULATIONS, LIBERALS!!!" She added, "At least I didn't miss the [[Ukrainian famine]](cf., Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times reporter [[Walter Duranty]])", (who did just that).<ref name="answering"/> {{Fact|date=November 2007}}


====Canadians fighting in Vietnam====
====Canadians fighting in Vietnam====

Revision as of 00:41, 12 November 2007

Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter
Born (1961-12-08) December 8, 1961 (age 62)
Occupation(s)author, columnist, political commentator
Websitehttp://www.anncoulter.com

Ann Hart Coulter (born December 8, 1961) is an American conservative columnist, political commentator and best-selling author, known for her biting satire. She frequently appears on television, radio and as a speaker at public and private events. Known for her confrontational style, Coulter describes herself as "Christian first and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second", and also as a "polemicist" who likes to "stir up the pot" and does not pretend to be "impartial or balanced".

Early life

Ann Hart Coulter was born to John Vincent and Nell Husbands Martin Coulter December 8, 1961[1]. After her birth in New York City, the family moved to New Canaan, Connecticut, where Coulter and her two older brothers were raised. She has described her family as "upper middle class" and has termed her attorney father a "union buster".[2][3]

As an undergraduate at Cornell University, Coulter helped found The Cornell Review,[4] and was a member of the Delta Gamma national women's fraternity.[5] She graduated cum laude from Cornell in 1984, and received her law degree from the University of Michigan Law School, where she achieved membership in the Order of the Coif and was an editor of the Michigan Law Review.[6] At Michigan, Coulter founded a local chapter of the Federalist Society and was trained at the National Journalism Center.[7]

After law school, Coulter served as a law clerk, in Kansas City, for Pasco Bowman II of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.[8] After a short time working in New York City in private practice, where she specialized in corporate law, Coulter left to work for the United States Senate Judiciary Committee after the Republican Party took control of Congress in 1994. She handled crime and immigration issues for Senator Spencer Abraham of Michigan, and helped craft legislation designed to expedite the deportation of aliens convicted of felonies.[9] She later became a litigator with the Center For Individual Rights.[10]

Personal life

Coulter has been engaged several times, but never married.[11] She has dated Spin publisher Bob Guccione, Jr.,[12] and conservative writer Dinesh D'Souza.[13] According to a report published in the New York Post on 10 October 2007, she is presently dating Andrew Stein, the former president of the New York City Council, who is a liberal Democrat. When asked about the relationship, Stein told the paper, "She's attacked a lot of my friends, but what can I say, opposites attract!"[14]

She owns both a condominium in Manhattan and a house, bought in 2005, in Palm Beach, Florida. Although she says that usually she lives in New York, she votes in Palm Beach and is not registered to do so in New York.[15] She is a fan of the Grateful Dead,[16][17] and some of her favorite books include The Bible, Wuthering Heights, Anna Karenina, true crime stories about serial killers, and anything by Dave Barry.[18]

Media career

Known for her controversial style,[19] she has been described by The Observer as "the Republican Michael Moore", and "Rush Limbaugh in a miniskirt".[20]

Television and radio

Coulter made her first national media appearance after she was hired in 1996 by MSNBC as a legal correspondent. Time said this about her tenure there:

The network dismissed her at least twice: first in February 1997, after she insulted the late Pamela Harriman, the U.S. Ambassador to France, even as the network was covering her somber memorial service.... Even so, the network missed Coulter's jousting and quickly rehired her.

Eight months later, Coulter's relationship with MSNBC ended permanently after she tangled with a disabled Vietnam veteran on the air. Robert Muller, co-founder of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, asserted that "in 90 percent of the cases that U.S. soldiers got blown up [in Vietnam] — Ann, are you listening? — they were our own mines." (Muller was quoting a 1969 Pentagon report that found that 90 percent of the components used in enemy mines came from U.S. duds and refuse.) Coulter averted her eyes and responded sarcastically: "No wonder you guys lost."

The Washington Post and others quoted Coulter saying: "People like you caused us to lose that war." After MSNBC, she began appearing on CNN and the Fox News Channel.[2]

Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post made a point to respond to the Time article to explain that his widely quoted reporting of Coulter's reply to the veteran in an article he wrote had its origin in Coulter's own later recollection of the incident. Describing his previous story, Kurtz added, "I did note that, according to Coulter, the vet was appearing by satellite, and she didn't know he was disabled."[21]

She has made frequent guest appearances on many television and radio talk shows, including The Today Show, Hannity and Colmes, The O'Reilly Factor, American Morning, Crossfire, Real Time with Bill Maher, Politically Incorrect, the fifth estate, The Sean Hannity Show, The Rush Limbaugh Show, and Mike Gallagher.

In 2005, Coulter appeared as one of a three-person judging panel in The Greatest American, a four-part interactive television event for the Discovery Channel hosted by Matt Lauer.[22] Starting with 100 nominees, each week interactive viewer voting eliminated candidates.

Films

In 2004, Coulter appeared in three films. The first was Feeding the Beast, which was a made-for-television documentary on the "24-Hour News Revolution".[23] The other two films were FahrenHYPE 9/11, a direct to video documentary designed to rebut Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 911, and Is It True What They Say About Ann?, a documentary on Coulter containing clips of interviews and speeches.[24]

In 2006, Coulter refused permission to include a scene featuring herself and Al Franken in a debate in Connecticut in Franken's film, Al Franken: God Spoke.[25]

Books

Ann Coulter.

Coulter is the author of six books. Five have appeared on New York Times Best Seller list; as of October 2007 the sixth had not been released long enough to make it onto the list.

Her first book, High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton (ISBN 0-89526-113-8), was published by Regnery Publishing in 1998. The book details Coulter's case for the impeachment of President Bill Clinton.

Her second book, Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right (ISBN 1-4000-4661-0), published by Crown Forum in 2002, remained number one on The New York Times Best Seller list for seven weeks. In Slander, Coulter argues that President George W. Bush faced an unfair battle for positive media coverage.

Her third book, Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism (ISBN 1-4000-5030-8), also published by Crown Forum, defends the presidency of Richard M. Nixon and accused Democratic politicians and the "liberal media" of undermining United States foreign policy. She also says that Annie Lee Moss, among others she mentions, was correctly identified by Joseph McCarthy as a Communist. Treason was published in 2003, and spent 13 weeks on the Best Seller list.[26]

Crown Forum published a collection of Coulter's columns in 2004 as her fourth book, How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must): The World According to Ann Coulter (ISBN 1-4000-5418-4).

Coulter's fifth book, published by Crown Forum in 2006, is Godless: The Church of Liberalism (ISBN 1-4000-5420-6). Coulter argues, first, that liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, and second, that it bears all the attributes of a religion itself. Godless debuted at number one on The New York Times Best Seller list.[27]

Her most recent book, If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans, was published in October, 2007.[28] [29]

Columns

In the late 1990s, Coulter's weekly (biweekly from 1999-2000) syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate began appearing. Her column is featured on six conservative websites: WorldNetDaily, Townhall.com, Human Events Online, FrontPageMag, Jewish World Review and her own website. Her syndicator says, "Ann's client newspapers stick with her because she has a loyal fan base of conservative readers who look forward to reading her columns in their local newspapers."[30] Her column on her personal website, anncoulter.com, is also permanently linked to by the Drudge Report web page.[31]

In 1999, Coulter worked for a time as a regular columnist for George magazine.[32][12] Coulter also wrote exclusive columns weekly between 1998 and 2003 and occasionally since for the conservative magazine Human Events. In it, she discusses judicial rulings, Constitutional issues, and legal matters affecting Congress and the executive branch.

Her columns are typically highly critical of liberals and Democrats. In one she wrote:

This year's Democratic plan for the future is another inane sound bite designed to trick American voters into trusting them with national security.

To wit, they're claiming there is no connection between the war on terror and the war in Iraq, and while they're all for the war against terror — absolutely in favor of that war — they are adamantly opposed to the Iraq war. You know, the war where the U.S. military is killing thousands upon thousands of terrorists (described in the media as "Iraqi civilians", even if they are from Jordan, like the now-dead leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi). That war.Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page).

Reactions from publishers

In 2001, as a contributing editor and syndicated columnist for National Review Online (NRO), Coulter was asked by editors to make changes to a piece written after the September 11 attacks. On the national television show Politically Incorrect, Coulter accused NRO of censorship and said that she was paid $5 per article. NRO dropped her column and terminated her editorship. Jonah Goldberg, editor-at-large of NRO, said, "We did not 'fire' Ann for what she wrote... we ended the relationship because she behaved with a total lack of professionalism, friendship, and loyalty [concerning the editing disagreement]."[33]

Coulter contracted with USA Today to cover the 2004 Democratic National Convention. She wrote one article that began, "Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston..." and referred to some unspecified female attendees as "corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons." The newspaper declined to print the article citing an editing dispute over "basic weaknesses in clarity and readability that we found unacceptable." An explanatory article by the paper went on to say "Coulter told the online edition of Editor & Publisher magazine that 'USA Today doesn't like my "tone", humor, sarcasm, etc., which raises the intriguing question of why they hired me to write for them.'" USA Today replaced Coulter with Goldberg, and Coulter published it instead on her website.[34][35][36]

In August 2005, the Arizona Daily Star dropped Coulter's syndicated column citing reader complaints that "Many readers find her shrill, bombastic and mean-spirited. And those are the words used by readers who identified themselves as conservatives."[37]

Following the publication of her fourth book, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, in July 2006, some newspapers replaced her column with those of other conservative columnists;[38] these included The Gazette of Cedar Rapids, Iowa,[39] The Augusta Chronicle of Augusta, Georgia,[40] and Yes! Weekly of Greensboro, North Carolina.[41] Augusta Chronicle editor Michael Ryan said after dropping her column: "Pulling Ann Coulter's column hurts; she's one of the clearest thinkers around." Ryan explained that "it came to the point where she was the issue rather than what she was writing about."[40]

Public appearances

Coulter is a frequent and controversial public speaker, particularly on college campuses, receiving both praise and protest. During an appearance at the University of Arizona, a pie was thrown at her.[42][43] Coulter has, on occasion, responded with insulting remarks towards hecklers and protestors who attend her speeches.[44][45][46][47][11]

Religious views

Coulter says that she holds Christian beliefs, but has avoided disclosing her membership of any particular denomination. At one public lecture she said: "I don't care about anything else: Christ died for my sins and nothing else matters."[48] In a 2004 column,[49] she summarized her view of Christianity: "Jesus' distinctive message was: People are sinful and need to be redeemed, and this is your lucky day because I'm here to redeem you even though you don't deserve it, and I have to get the crap kicked out of me to do it." She then mocked "the message of Jesus ... according to liberals," summarising it as "...something along the lines of 'be nice to people'," which, in turn, she said "is, in fact, one of the incidental tenets of Christianity".

Confronting some critics' views that her content and style of writing is un-Christian,[50][51] she has stated that "I'm a Christian first and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second, and don't you ever forget it."[52] She has also said: "... Christianity fuels everything I write. Being a Christian means that I am called upon to do battle against lies, injustice, cruelty, hypocrisy — you know, all the virtues in the church of liberalism."[53] In Godless: The Church of Liberalism, as well as in personal appearances, Coulter makes it very clear that she is a creationist, claiming that there is no evidence proving the theory of evolution and calling it "bogus science".[54][55]

On 8 October 2007, when Coulter was talking about Republicans with Donny Deutsch, a CNBC talk-show host who is Jewish, she implied that she considered Christianity a virtue, which prompted Deutsch to ask her, "It would be better if we were all Christian?", to which Coulter replied "Yes". Deutsch asked her, "We should all be Christian?", and got the same response, with an invitation to come to church. Later on, Coulter said, "we just want Jews to be perfected, as they say", saying that this was what Christianity was, and she compared the New Testament to Federal Express. Further, Coulter said that Christians considered themselves to be perfected Jews. Deutsch implied that this was an anti-Semitic remark, but Coulter said she didn't consider it to be a hateful comment.[56]

Political activities

Coulter's political activities have included advising a plaintiff suing the president and considering a run for Congress.

The Paula Jones – Bill Clinton case

Coulter debuted as a public figure shortly before becoming an unpaid legal advisor for the attorneys representing Paula Jones in her sexual harassment suit against President Bill Clinton. Coulter's friend George Conway had been asked to assist Jones' attorneys, and shortly afterward Coulter, who wrote a column about the Paula Jones case for Human Events, was also asked to help; she began writing legal briefs for the case.

Coulter later stated that she would come to mistrust the motives of Jones' head lawyer, Joseph Cammaratta, who by August or September 1997 was advising Jones that her case was weak and to settle, if a favorable settlement could be negotiated.[9][57] From the onset, Jones had sought an apology from Clinton at least as eagerly as she sought a settlement.[58] However, in a later interview Coulter recounted that she herself had believed that the case was strong, and that a settlement would give the impression that Jones was merely interested in extorting money from the President.[9]

David Daley, who wrote the interview piece for the Hartford Courant recounted what followed:

Coulter played one particularly key role in keeping the Jones case alive. In Newsweek reporter Michael Isikoff's new book Uncovering Clinton: A Reporter's Story, Coulter is unmasked as the one who leaked word of Clinton's "distinguishing characteristic" — his reportedly bent penis that Jones said she could recognize and describe — to the news media. Her hope was to foster mistrust between the Clinton and Jones camps and forestall a settlement...

"I thought if I leaked the distinguishing characteristic it would show bad faith in negotiations. [Clinton lawyer] Bob Bennett would think Jones had leaked it. Cammaratta would know he himself hadn't leaked it and would get mad at Bennett. It might stall negotiations enough for me to get through to [Jones adviser] Susan Carpenter-McMillan to tell her that I thought settling would hurt Paula, that this would ruin her reputation, and that there were other lawyers working for her. Then 36 hours later, she returned my phone call.
"I just wanted to help Paula. I really think Paula Jones is a hero. I don't think I could have taken the abuse she came under. She's this poor little country girl and she has the most powerful man she's ever met hitting on her sexually, then denying it and smearing her as president. And she never did anything tacky. It's not like she was going on TV or trying to make a buck out of it."[9]

Coulter also told Isikoff: "We were terrified that Jones would settle. It was contrary to our purpose of bringing down the President."[57]

The case went to court after Jones broke with Coulter and her original legal team, and it was dismissed via summary judgment. The judge ruled that even if her allegations proved true, Jones did not show that she had suffered any damages, stating "...plaintiff has not demonstrated any tangible job detriment or adverse employment action for her refusal to submit to the governor's alleged advances. The president is therefore entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's claim of quid pro quo sexual harassment". The ruling was appealed by Jones' lawyers. During the pendency of the appeal, Clinton settled with Jones for $850,000 ($151,000 after legal fees) in November 1998, in exchange for Jones' dismissal of the appeal. By then, the Jones lawsuit had led to the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal.

In October 2000, Jones revealed that she would pose for nude pictures in an adult magazine, saying she wanted to use the money to pay taxes and support her children, in particular saying "I'm wanting to put them through college and maybe set up a college fund."[59] Coulter publicly denounced Jones, calling her "the trailer-park trash they said she was", (Coulter had earlier chastened Clinton supporters for calling Jones this name[60] after Clinton's former campaign strategist James Carville had made the widely-reported remark, "Drag a $100 bill through a trailer park, and you'll never know what you'll find") and called Jones a "fraud, at least to the extent of pretending to be an honorable and moral person."[59] Coulter wrote: "Paula surely was given more than a million dollars in free legal assistance from an array of legal talent she will never again encounter in her life, much less have busily working on her behalf. Some of those lawyers never asked for or received a dime for hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal work performed at great professional, financial and personal cost to themselves. Others got partial payments out of the settlement. But at least they got her reputation back. And now she's thrown it away."[61] Jones claimed not to have been offered any help with a book deal of her own or any other additional financial help after the lawsuit.[59]

Past congressional candidacy

In 1999 and 2000, Coulter considered running for Congress from Connecticut on the Libertarian Party ticket to serve as a spoiler in order to throw the seat to the Democratic candidate and see that Republican Congressman Christopher Shays failed to gain re-election, as a punishment for Shays' vote against Clinton's impeachment. The leadership of the Libertarian Party of Connecticut, after meeting with Coulter, declined to endorse her. As a result, her self-described "total sham, media-intensive, third-party Jesse Ventura campaign" did not take place.[12][62]

Legal and professional disputes

Irregularities in public registration

In September 2002, Washington Post columnist Lloyd Grove wrote a column titled, "Mystery of the Ages", raising questions about Coulter's actual date of birth.[1] At the time, Coulter was insisting that she was not yet 40, despite media reports to the contrary. Attempting to resolve the discrepancy, Grove noted that Coulter had given her date of birth as December 8, 1961 when she first registered to vote in 1980 (the year of the Reagan-vs-Carter presidential election), in New Canaan, Connecticut, where the legal voting age is 18. He said that Coulter's Connecticut driver's license also listed her birth date as December 1961, but pointed out that a driver's license issued to her years later in Washington, D.C., gave her date of birth as December 1963. In her emailed reply to Grove's inquiry, Coulter maintained that she was 38 years old. In April 2005, Time's cover story on Coulter reported, "Coulter says she won't confirm the date 'for privacy reasons' — she's had several stalkers. 'And I'm a girl,' she adds."[2]

Alleged factual inaccuracies

Comedian, author, and political commentator Al Franken has questioned the factual accuracy of her books, and also accuses her of citing passages out of context.[63] Others have investigated these charges, and have also raised questions about the books' accuracy and presentation of facts.[64][65][66] Coulter responded to these and similar criticisms in a column called "Answering My Critics",[67] where she claims "the most devastating examples of my alleged 'lies' keep changing" and that some accusations of her factual inaccuracy are either outright wrong or really just "trivial" factual errors (e.g. referring to "endnotes" as "footnotes", or incorrectly identifying Evan Thomas' grandfather, Socialist Party presidential candidate Norman Thomas, as his father).

New York Times' NASCAR coverage

In Slander, Coulter alleges The New York Times did not cover NASCAR driver Dale Earnhardt's death until two days after he died:

The day after seven-time NASCAR Winston Cup champion Dale Earnhardt died in a race at the Daytona 500, almost every newspaper in America carried the story on the front page. Stock-car racing had been the nation's fastest-growing sport for a decade, and NASCAR the second-most-watched sport behind the NFL. More Americans recognize the name Dale Earnhardt than, say, Maureen Dowd. (Manhattan liberals are dumbly blinking at that last sentence.) It took The New York Times two days to deem Earnhardt's death sufficiently important to mention it on the first page. Demonstrating the left's renowned populist touch, the article began, 'His death brought a silence to the Wal-Mart.' The Times went on to report that in vast swaths of the country people watch stock-car racing. Tacky people were mourning Dale Earnhardt all over the South![68]

The New York Times did, in fact, cover Earnhardt's death the same day that he died: sportswriter Robert Lipsyte authored an article for the front page that was published on February 18, 2001. Another front page article appeared in the Times on the following day. Coulter cites an article indeed written two days after Earnhardt's death - Rick Bragg, a Pulitzer Prize winner who grew up in the South, wrote a personal piece on Earnhardt and his passing - bringing the total to three times in which the Times covered Earnhardt, three days in a row.[63]

Even though this error was corrected in later printings of this books, liberals continued to use it to smear Coulter.

Coulter was finally forced to respond to these attacks after an especially vitriolic attack by Al Franken in his 2003 book Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. He singled out this relatively minor error in an blatantly tendentious attempt to discredit Coulter, even though the book contained no less than 780 separate footnotes. She said, "In my three best-selling books — making the case for a president's impeachment, accusing liberals of systematic lying and propagandizing, arguing that Joe McCarthy was a great American patriot, and detailing 50 years of treachery by the Democratic Party — this is the only vaguely substantive error the Ann Coulter hysterics have been able to produce, corrected soon after publication. CONGRATULATIONS, LIBERALS!!!" She added, "At least I didn't miss the Ukrainian famine(cf., Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times reporter Walter Duranty)", (who did just that).[67] [citation needed]

Canadians fighting in Vietnam

Coulter has been criticized for a statement she made on the fifth estate, an investigative journalism program produced by CBC television. During an interview by host Bob McKeown, Coulter said, "Canada used to be...one of our most...most loyal friends, and vice versa. I mean, Canada sent troops to Vietnam. Was Vietnam less containable and more of a threat than Saddam Hussein?" McKeown contradicted her with, "No, actually Canada did not send troops to Vietnam." After both had insisted repeatedly, the exchange ended with Coulter's saying, "Well, I’ll get back to you on that."[69] This was afterward characterized by Keith Olbermann on Countdown with Keith Olbermann as an instance of "...Coulter humiliating herself on national TV...[but]...this time...on Canadian national TV."[70] On the February 18, 2005 edition of Washington Journal, Coulter sought to justify her statement by referring to the roughly 10,000 Canadians who volunteered for the American armed forces, and thus fought in Vietnam, stating:[69]

Yes, 10,000 Canadian troops, at least. There is a War Memorial to them, at least for most of that. The Canadian Government didn't send troops [...] but [...] they came and fought with the Americans. So I was wrong. It turns out there were 10,000 Americans who happened to be born in Canada. .... I didn't believe [McKeown] because I had read about Canadian troops in Vietnam. I was right. People keep saying: "Well, he didn't tell you that they — 10,000 troops ran across to sign up with the American forces." I don't think he knew! He's a bubblehead, Ted Baxter.[70][71]

John Cloud of Time, writing a few months later, called this exchange "one of the most popular alleged mistakes [by Coulter] pinging around the Web", but suggested that Coulter may have been right, on the basis that "Canada [sent] noncombat troops to Indochina in the 1950s and again to Vietnam in 1972".[72] However, Coulter's initial assertion was that Canada sent troops into Vietnam in support of the American position; in this connection, FAIR countered that Cloud made "quite a stretch to prove that Coulter was correct."[73]

New York Times Christians/Nazis Controversy

In her book Slander, Coulter also stated that the New York Times made several statements comparing Christians to Nazis. As examples, she cites a headline reading "Did the Nazi Crimes Draw On Christian Tradition?" and a quote, "The church was co-responsible for the Holocaust." She does not mention that the first quote was from a book review in which the reviewer disagreed with the thesis that the Nazi crimes drew on Christian tradition. The second quote was from a discussion printed in the Times, in which a historian also states that Pope Pius XII was responsible for saving 750,000 Jews.[74]

Controversies and criticism

While she is in constant demand on the US lecture circuit,[3] Coulter's polemics - she has described herself as a "polemicist" who likes to "stir up the pot" and doesn't claim to be "impartial or balanced".[75] - sometimes start firestorms of controversy, ranging from rowdy uprisings at many of the colleges where she speaks to protracted discussions in the media.

The 9/11 "Jersey Girls"

In her book Godless: The Church of Liberalism, Coulter criticizes the four 9/11 widows known as the "Jersey Girls;" in it Coulter wrote:

These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis. These self-obsessed women seemed genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them. ... I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much ... the Democrat ratpack gals endorsed John Kerry for president ... cutting campaign commercials... how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy."[76]

These statements received national attention after an interview on The Today Show, and were widely criticized.[77][78][79][80][81][82] Coulter has repeated her criticism of the Jersey Girls in subsequent columns.[83][84][78]

Comments about the New York Times

Coulter has had a long-running animosity toward the New York Times. Her book Slander is a criticism of liberals for disparaging conservatives unfairly, giving particular attention to the news media for their role in this, and the Times especially.[85]

In an interview with George Gurley of the New York Observer shortly after the publication of Slander, it was mentioned that Coulter actually had friends and acquaintances who worked for the Times, namely restaurant critic Frank Bruni and correspondent David E. Sanger. Later in the interview, she exclaimed amusement at her recollections of the Times publishing two photos of George H. W. Bush throwing up at a diplomatic meeting in Japan, then said:

"Is your tape recorder running? Turn it on! I got something to say."


Then she said: "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
I told her to be careful.


"You’re right, after 9/11 I shouldn’t say that", she said, spotting a cab and grabbing it.[13]

By way of context, during an interview earlier in June 2002 with Katie Couric to promote the same book, Coulter expressed frustration about "constant mischaracterization" through being misquoted. "The idea that someone can go out and find one quote that will suddenly, you know, portray me — just dismiss her ideas, read no more, read no further, this person is crazy...is precisely what liberals do all the time".[86]

When asked by John Hawkins, the web manager of a right-wing blog, through a pre-written set of interview questions if she regretted the statement, Coulter replied by saying: "Of course I regret it. I should have added, 'after everyone had left the building except the editors and reporters.'"[87][88] Lee Salem, the president of Universal Press Syndicate, which distributes Coulter's column, later defended Coulter by characterizing her comments as satire.[89]

The subject came up again when she appeared on the Fox News program Hannity & Colmes. Alan Colmes mentioned Salem's claim, and said to her that remarks like saying "Timothy McVeigh should have bombed The New York Times building" were "laughable happy satires, right?" then said that Coulter was "actually a liberal who is doing this to mock and parody the way conservatives think." She replied, "Well, it's not working very well if that were my goal. No, I think the Timothy McVeigh line was merely prescient after The New York Times has leaped beyond — beyond nonsense straight into treason, last week". She was referring to a Times report that revealed classified information about an anti-terrorism program of the U.S. government involving surveillance of international financial transactions of persons suspected of having Al-Qaida links. Colmes continued in this sarcastic vein when he responded, calling her remarks "great humor", and that it "belongs on Saturday Night Live. It belongs on The Daily Show."[90][91]

Comments on Islam, Arabs, and terrorism

Since the September 11, 2001 attacks, Coulter has advocated a more warlike response to terrorism. On September 12 2001, the day after the attacks, she wrote in her column:

Airports scrupulously apply the same laughably ineffective airport harassment to Suzy Chapstick as to Muslim hijackers. It is preposterous to assume every passenger is a potential crazed homicidal maniac. We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.[92]

Responding to this comment, Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations remarked in the Chicago Sun Times that before Sept 11, Coulter "would have faced swift repudiation from her colleagues", but "now it's accepted as legitimate commentary."[93]

A few weeks after the attacks, Coulter asserted that only Muslims could have been behind the attacks:

Not all Muslims may be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims -- at least all terrorists capable of assembling a murderous plot against America that leaves 7,000 people dead in under two hours.[94]

Coulter has been highly critical of the U.S. Department of Transportation and especially its then-secretary Norman Mineta. Her many criticisms include their refusal to use racial profiling as a component of airport screening.[95] However, one such apparently ethnicity-driven screening attempt by US Airways sparked a call for Muslims to boycott the airline because of the ejection from a flight of six imams who had been observed praying in the terminal. Commenting on this incident, Coulter observed:

If only we could get Muslims to boycott all airlines, we could dispense with airport security altogether.[96]

Coulter also called for increasing the power of U.S. law enforcement agencies to search Muslims, describing the testimony of Coleen Rowley, an FBI whistleblower who argued before the Senate in 2002 that in cases where Muslims suspected of a crime are known to be affiliated with radical fundamental Islamic groups or even simply had lived in England, authorities should be granted a search warrant based on probable cause. Coulter cited a poll by The Daily Telegraph which found that 98 percent of Muslims between the ages of 20 to 45 said they would not fight for Britain in the war in Afghanistan, and that 48 percent said they would fight for Osama bin Laden. She said she agreed with Rowley, "certainly after Sept 11", and concluded: "The FBI allowed thousands of Americans to be slaughtered on the altar of political correctness. What more do liberals want?"[97]

She wrote in another column that she had reviewed the civil rights lawsuits against certain airlines to determine which airlines had subjected Arabs to the most "egregious discrimination" so that she could fly only that airline. She also said that the airline should be bragging instead of denying any of the charges of discrimination brought against them.[98] In an interview with the The Guardian she quipped, "I think airlines ought to start advertising: 'We have the most civil rights lawsuits brought against us by Arabs.'" When the interviewer replied by asking what Muslims would do for travel, she responded, "They could use flying carpets."[3]

One comment that drew criticism from the blogosphere as well as fellow conservatives[99] was made during a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February 2006, where she said, referring to the prospect of a nuclear-equipped Iran, "What if they start having one of these bipolar episodes with nuclear weapons? I think our motto should be, post-9-11: raghead talks tough, raghead faces consequences."[100] Coulter had previously written a nearly identical passage in her syndicated column: "...I believe our motto should be after 9/11: Jihad monkey talks tough; jihad monkey takes the consequences. Sorry, I realize that's offensive. How about 'camel jockey'? What? Now what'd I say? Boy, you tent merchants sure are touchy. Grow up, would you?"[101]

In October 2007, Coulter made more controversial remarks about Arabs, in this case Iraqis, when she stated, in an interview with the New York Observer

We’ve killed about 20,000 of them, of terrorists, of militants, of Al Qaeda members, and they’ve gotten a little over 3,000 of ours. That is where the war is being fought, in Iraq, that is where we are fighting Al Qaeda. Sorry we have to use your country, Iraqis, but you let Saddam come to power, ha-ha, and we are going to instill democracy in your country.[102]

In an article looking back at the life of the recently deceased evangelical Reverend Jerry Falwell, Coulter commented on Falwell's statement after the 9/11 attacks that "pagans", abortionists, feminists, and gays and lesbians, among others, helped make the attacks happen. In her article, Coulter stated that she disagreed with Falwell's statement, "because Falwell neglected to specifically include Teddy Kennedy and "the Reverend" Barry Lynn."[103]

Homosexuality

Coulter has accused several public figures of being homosexual. On July 26, 2006 she said former president Bill Clinton "shows some level of latent homosexuality." The next day, she also described former vice president Al Gore as gay, "But Al Gore -- total fag." She then said she was "just kidding" about Al Gore but that she was serious about Bill Clinton.[104]

2007 John Edwards controversy

The next year, Coulter drew criticism for statements she made at the 2007 Conservative Political Action Conference, where she arguably implied that she would have to use the term "faggot" if she were to talk about presidential candidate John Edwards, in an allusion to Grey's Anatomy star Isaiah Washington's use of the word and his subsequent mandatory "psychological assessment":[105][106][107]

I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards, but it turns out that you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I'm - so, kind of at an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards, so I think I'll just conclude here and take your questions.[108][109]

The audience responded in laughter, but Edwards responded on his website by characterizing Coulter's words as "un-American and indefensible" and asking readers to help him "raise $100,000 in 'Coulter Cash' this week to keep this campaign charging ahead and fight back against the politics of bigotry."[110] Coulter's words also drew the condemnation from many prominent Republicans and Democrats, as well as groups such as the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD).[110][111][112] Coulter responded in an e-mail to the New York Times: "C’mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that they are like John Edwards. That would be mean."[111] She also posted a response on her website: "I'm so ashamed, I can't stop laughing!"[113]

On March 5, 2007, Coulter appeared on Hannity and Colmes and said that "[f]aggot isn't offensive to gays; it has nothing to do with gays. It's a schoolyard taunt meaning 'wuss'". In regards to criticism from Republican presidential hopefuls Mitt Romney, John McCain, and Rudy Giuliani, Coulter responded with "Apparently our top three Republican nominees aren't that smart. And by the way, if they're going to start apologizing for everything I say, they better keep that statement handy cause there's going to be a lot more in the next year."[114]

In response to this issue, three advertisers (Verizon, Sallie Mae, and Netbank) pulled their advertisements from Coulter's website,[115] and eight newspapers dropped Coulter's column, including The Times in Louisiana, The Oakland Press in Michigan, The Mountain Press of Sevierville, Tennessee, and the New Era in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.[116][117][118]

Responding to the controversy, Coulter has said:

Just for the record, I've never attempted to revise, or extend, nor have I apologized and the attempts to silence me have made me even more money…Those newspapers pay me about 25 cents per month, but I picked up a LOT of speeches…Attempts to censor me have really backfired. [119][citation needed]

In a June 25, 2007 appearance on Good Morning America, in reference to her reference to her "joke" about Edwards, Coulter said: "But about the same time, you know, Bill Maher was not joking and saying he wished Dick Cheney had been killed in a terrorist attack -- so I've learned my lesson: If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."[120]

In a next-day appearance on MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews, Coulter received a phone call from Elizabeth Edwards, John Edwards’ wife, asking her to stop the personal attacks and to stick to discussing the issues. Coulter responded by claiming that the Edwards campaign was “raising money off it” and denied "saying anything about him [Edwards], actually, either time". Mrs. Edwards also confronted Coulter for writing that they had a bumper sticker on their car saying "Ask me about my dead son" in reference to the death of their son Wade. Coulter responded by characterizing Edwards' call as an attempt to silence her and by attacking Edwards for his activities as a trial lawyer.[121][122]

Coulter explained her response to Mrs. Edwards in a subsequent column: "Edwards is...the trial lawyer who pretended in court to channel the spirit of a handicapped fetus in front of illiterate jurors to scam tens of millions of dollars off of innocent doctors...Apparently every time Edwards began a story about his dead son with 'I've never told anyone this before,' everyone on the campaign could lip-sync the story with him." "If you want points for not using your son's death politically, don't you have to take down all those 'Ask me about my son's death in a horrific car accident' bumper stickers? Edwards is like a politician who keeps announcing that he will not use his opponent's criminal record for partisan political advantage." "As a commentator, I bring facts like these to the attention of the American people in a lively way."[120]

Investigation of possible voting fraud

Beginning in February, 2006, Coulter was investigated for but not charged with voting fraud for registering with the address of her real estate agent and consequently voting in the wrong precinct, a third-degree felony in Florida.[123] In May 2007 Palm Beach County authorities declined to prosecute, citing 'insubstantial evidence' of deliberate wrongdoing. Jim Fitzgerald, an FBI profiler, had told the investigating detective that Coulter had reason to fear a stalker.[124][125] Three months later it was revealed that the Florida Elections Commission had assigned an investigator to further pursue the question.[126]

Taking away women's right to vote

TIME Magazine's John Cloud observes that Coulter "likes to shock reporters by wondering aloud whether America might be better off if women lost the right to vote."[2] For example, in a May 2003 interview with The Guardian, Coulter said.[3]

"...It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since 1950 - except Goldwater in '64 - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted.

Again, in an October 2007 interview with the New York Observer, Coulter said:[127]

"If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.

"It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'"

Comments about Jews on The Big Idea

During an interview with Donny Deutsch on his CNBC program The Big Idea (8 October 2007), Coulter stated that the United States is a Christian nation and suggested Christians viewed themselves as "perfected Jews".[128][129] Deutsch, a practicing Jew, told Coulter he found the comments personally offensive and anti-semitic; Coulter replied that she could not understand his reaction.[130]

DEUTSCH: You said -- your exact words were, "Jews need to be perfected." Those are the words out of your mouth.

COULTER: No, I'm saying that's what a Christian is.
DEUTSCH: But that's what you said -- don't you see how hateful, how anti-Semitic --
COULTER: No!
DEUTSCH: How do you not see? You're an educated woman. How do you not see that?

COULTER: That isn't hateful at all.

In an interview published in Adweek three days after the interview, Deutsch noted that when he challenged her comments, Coulter appeared "to back off" and "seemed a little upset", adding, "I think she got frightened that maybe she had crossed a line, that this was maybe a faux pas of great proportions. I mean, did it show ignorance? Anti-Semitism? It wasn't just one of those silly things."[131]

Dennis Prager, a prominent conservative talk show host, commented that although, as a practicing Jew, he obviously did not agree with Coulter's theology, her comments were not anti-semitic.[132] He noted that: "There is nothing in what Ann Coulter said to a Jewish interviewer on CNBC that indicates she hates Jews or wishes them ill, or does damage to the Jewish people or the Jewish state. And if none of those criteria is present, how can someone be labeled anti-Semitic?"[133]

In response to Coulter's comments on the show, the Anti-Defamation League issued a statement saying it "strongly condemns Ann Coulter for her anti-Semitic comment", and that to "espouse the idea that Judaism needs to be replaced with Christianity and that each individual Jew is somehow deficient and needs to be 'perfected,' is rank Christian supersessionism and has been rejected by the Catholic Church and the vast majority of mainstream Christian denominations."[134] The American Jewish Committee similarly issued a statement asserting that "Ms. Coulter's assertion that Jews are somehow religiously imperfect smacks of the most odious anti-Jewish sentiment."[135]

References

  1. ^ a b Grove, Lloyd. "Mystery of the ages", The Washington Post, September 6 2002. Retrieved on July 24 2006.
  2. ^ a b c d Cloud, John. "Ms. Right". Time Magazine. April 25, 2005. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  3. ^ a b c d Freedland, Jonathan "An appalling magic". The Guardian, May 17 2003. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  4. ^ Horowitz, David. "Ann Coulter at Cornell". FrontPageMag.com. May 21 2001. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  5. ^ "From the pens of Delta Gammas" (PDF). Anchora of Delta Gamma. Summer 2005. p. 29 (16 in PDF). Retrieved 2006-07-11.
  6. ^ "Ann Coulter: bestselling author and political commentator (Profile)". premierespeakers.com. Retrieved on July 10 2006. See also Michigan Law Review vol. 86 No. 5 (April 1988), where Ann Coulter "of Connecticut" is listed on the masthead as an articles editor.
  7. ^ Hallow, Ralph. "A lifelong voice for conservatives". The Washington Times. February 21 2006. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  8. ^ See Lythgoe, Dennis (2003-10-05). "Liberals, conservatives duke it out on paper". Deseret Morning News. p. E1.; Hentoff, Nat (1998-12-05). "Op-Ed: Congress Goes Fishing". Washington Post. p. A23.; Coulter herself says it was Bowman. See her online bio; see also Coulter, Ann (2001-05-03). "ABA's ratings no more". Washington Times. p. A15.
  9. ^ a b c d Daley, David. "Ann Coulter: light's all shining on her". Hartford Courant. June 25 1999. [$2.50 charge required to view article]
  10. ^ Moore, Frazier (2003-10-05). "Conservative Coulter sounds off in her latest book; Treason aims to change views on McCarthy". Telegraph Herald. p. e2.
  11. ^ a b Staff Writer. "I love to pick fights with liberals" The Daily Telegraph July 7 2002. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  12. ^ a b c Lehman, Susan. "Conservative pinup battles "arm candy" canard". Salon.com. March 4 1999. Retrieved July 10 2006.
  13. ^ a b Gurley, George. "Coultergeist". New York Observer. August 26, 2002. Retrieved on October 8, 2007.
  14. ^ ANDY AND ANN?!
  15. ^ Lisberg, Adam. "Her disputed elex ballot sparks probe in Florida". New York Daily News. June 8 2006. Retrieved August 21 2007
  16. ^ Bowman, David. "Ann Coulter, woman". Salon.com. July 25 2003. Retrieved on July 11 2006.
  17. ^ Hill, Taylor. "'Deadheads Are What Liberals Claim to Be But Aren't': An Interview with Ann Coulter". jambands.com. June 23 2006. Retrieved on October 7 2007.
  18. ^ Glazov, Jamie. "Frontpage interview: Ann Coulter". Frontpage Magazine. January 12 2004. Retrieved on July 19 2006.
  19. ^ Schmidt Tracey. "What Would Ann Coulter Do?" Time Magazine.
  20. ^ Wood, Gaby. "Lethally blonde" The Observer. June 11 2006. Retrieved on July 11 2006.
  21. ^ "Kurtz, Howard. "The conservative pin-up girl". Washington Post. April 19 2005. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  22. ^ "Greatest American (2005) (mini)". Internet Movie Database. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  23. ^ "Feeding the Beast: The 24-Hour News Revolution (2004) (TV)". Internet Movie Database. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  24. ^ "Is It True What They Say About Ann? (2004)" Internet Movie Database. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  25. ^ Faraci, Devin. "Is Ann Coulter sabotaging Al Franken's film?" CHUD.com. August 29 2006. Retrieved September 29 2006.
  26. ^ Guthmann, Edward. "An outbreak of partisan warfare on the best-seller list is encouraging authors to stoke the fires of readers hungry for political squabbles -- and the Bay Area is fertile ground for Bush-whackers". San Francisco Chronicle. December 2 2003. Retrieved on July 10 2006
  27. ^ "New York Times bestseller list: hardcover nonfiction". New York Times. June 25 2006. Retrieved on July 10 2006. [Registration required to view article]
  28. ^ Randomhouse.com
  29. ^ brief excerpt of "If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans"
  30. ^ Astor, Dave; Mitchell, Greg. "Newspaper clients, and syndicate, stick with Coulter". Editor & Publisher. June 16 2006. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  31. ^ Drudge, Matt. "11/18/2001 edition of Drudge Report" DrudgeReportArchives.com. November 18 2001. Retrieved on October 25 2006
  32. ^ Coulter, Ann. "A Republican tribute to John", www.uexpress.com, July 28 1999. Retrieved on October 22 2006.
  33. ^ Goldberg, Jonah. "L’affaire Coulter". National Review. October 3,2001. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  34. ^ Coulter, Ann. "Put the speakers in a cage". WorldNetDaily. July 26 2004. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  35. ^ Staff Writer. "USA Today drops Ann Coulter." CBS News. July 26, 2004. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  36. ^ Memmott, Mark. "Coulter column canceled after editing dispute". USA Today. July 26 2006. Retrieved on July 11 2006.
  37. ^ Stoeffler, David. "Opinion pages get a makeover". Arizona Daily Star. August 28 2005. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  38. ^ E&P Staff. "Another Newspaper Decides to Drop Ann Coulter's Column" Editor & Publisher July 26 2006 Retrieved on July 28 2006
  39. ^ Weber, Sarah. "Cedar Rapids Newspaper Drops Ann Coulter's Column" Editor & Publisher July 12 2006
  40. ^ a b Astor, Dave; Mitchell, Greg. "Augusta Editor Explains Why He Dropped Coulter Column" Editor & Publisher July 24, 2006 Retrieved July 26 2006; mirrored by freerepublic.com
  41. ^ Yes! Weekly Staff. "Ann's out, Bill's in" Yes! Weekly. Accessed July 28 2006
  42. ^ Staff Writer. "'Al Pieda' targets Ann Coulter." The Smoking Gun. October 22, 2004. Retrieved on July 10, 2006.
  43. ^ Wells, Holly. "Former student enters plea in 2004 Coulter pie assault." Arizona Daily Wildcat. January 12, 2006. Retrieved on July 10, 2006.
  44. ^ "The pie-proof Ann Coulter on hecklers." Fox News. May 4, 2005. Retrieved on July 13, 2006.
  45. ^ http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=50
  46. ^ Wong, Shelly K. "Hecklers cause Coulter to cut UConn speech." Associated Press., December 7, 2005. Retrieved on July 10, 2006.
  47. ^ Guidi, David. "Controversial conservative pundit elicits praise and protest Thursday". [University of South Florida] The Oracle. October 20, 2006. Retrieved on November 9, 2006.
  48. ^ Olasky, Marvin. "South Park vs. Ann Coulter". World. August 13 2005. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  49. ^ The passion of the liberal, townhall.com, March 4 2004
  50. ^ Norman, Tony. "If Ann Coulter's a Christian, I'll be damned". Commondreams.org. June 10 2006. Retrieved July 31,2006.
  51. ^ Thoreau, Jackson. "U.S. founders and Christ were liberals: we cannot let right-wingers like Coulter define liberalism". OpEdNews.com. June 9 2006. Retrieved July 31, 2006.
  52. ^ E&P Staff. "Coulter: Press Either 'Incompetent' or Full of 'Left-Wing Bias'". Editor and Publisher. July 31 2006. Retrieved July 31 2006.
  53. ^ De Pasquale, Lisa. Exclusive interview: Coulter says book examines 'mental disorder' of Liberalism". Human Events. June 6 2006. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  54. ^ Godless: The Church of Liberalism Book Description on Amazon.com
  55. ^ Book Review by Human Events
  56. ^ E&P Staff. "Ann Coulter on CNBC Show: Jews Need 'Perfecting'". Editor and Publisher. October 11 2007.
  57. ^ a b Conason, Joe; Lyons, Gene. "Impeachment's little elves". Salon.com. March 4 2000. Retrieved July 10 2006.
  58. ^ Barak, Daphne. "Jones would have been happy with an apology". Irish Examiner. September 23 1998. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  59. ^ a b c Jones, Paula. "Paula Jones describes why she's posing for Penthouse". Larry King Live. CNN. October 24 2000. Retrieved on October 24, 2000
  60. ^ Ann Coulter ""'Trailer park trash' strikes back". Human Events. January 30 1998. Retrieved on November 18, 2006
  61. ^ Coulter, Ann. "Clinton sure can pick 'em". Jewish World Review. October 30 2000. Retrieved July 11 2006.
  62. ^ Browne, Harry. "We're more ambitious than the Republicans are". Harry Browne. September 22 2000. Retrieved July 10 2006.
  63. ^ a b Franken, Al (2003). Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. Dutton Books. ISBN 0-525-94764-7. {{cite book}}: Text "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right" ignored (help)
  64. ^ Scherer, Michael; Secules, Sarah. "Books: how slippery is Slander?" Columbia Journalism Review. 2002. Retrieved on July 11, 2006.
  65. ^ "Throwing the book at her" on the nonpartisan Spinsanity. July 13, 2002. Retrieved September 30, 2007.
  66. ^ "Screed: With Treason, Ann Coulter once again defines a new low in America's political debate" on the nonpartisan Spinsanity. June 30, 2003. Retrieved September 30, 2007.
  67. ^ a b Coulter, Ann. "Answering my critics." Jewish World Review. October 9, 2003. Retrieved on July 11, 2006.
  68. ^ Coulter, Ann. Slander. 2006, Crown Forum Publishing. ISBN 1-4000-4661-0
  69. ^ a b Sticks and Stones, the fifth estate, CBC Television, aired January 26, 2005
  70. ^ a b Sticks and Stones: US Response
  71. ^ http://www.cbcwatch.ca/?q=node/view/936
  72. ^ See Cloud, John. "Ms. Right p. 10". Time Magazine. April 25, 2005. Retrieved 2001-02-11. Cloud refers the soldiers Canada contributed to the ICC and the ICCS, the international commissions which oversaw, respectively, the cease-fire at the end of the First Indochina War, in 1954, and the cease-fire which interrupted the Vietnam War in 1973. For further information on Canada's involvement in the Vietnam War, see Canada and the Vietnam War.
  73. ^ Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (2005-04-21). "Time Covers Coulter: Action Alert". Retrieved 2007-02-11. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  74. ^ C., Scott: "World O'Crap", http://blogs.salon.com/0002874/2003/10/09.html
  75. ^ Aloi, Daniel. "Conservative pundit Ann Coulter '84 to speak May 7". Cornell University Chronicle. April 17 2006. Retrieved on July 10 2006.
  76. ^ Coulter, Ann. Godless: The Church of Liberalism. 2006, Crown Forum Publishing. pp. 100-112.
  77. ^ Grimaldi, Christine. "Writer's claims disturb families of 9/11 victims: Ann Coulter referred to group as the 'Witches of East Brunswick'." North Brunswick Sentinel. July 16, 2006. Retrieved on November 10, 2006
  78. ^ a b E&P Staff. "Ann Coulter attacks 9/11 widows." Editor & Publisher. June 6, 2006. Retrieved on July 10, 2006.
  79. ^ Staff Writer. "Clinton slams Coulter's 'vicious' put-down of some 9/11 widows." CNN. June 7, 2006.
  80. ^ Lathem, Niles; Algar, Selim. "Give-'em-hill Fury vs. Coulter." New York Post. June 8, 2006. Retrieved on July 10, 2006.
  81. ^ Staff Writer. "9-11 commish lashes Coulter." WorldNetDaily. June 9, 2006. Retrieved on July 10, 2006.
  82. ^ Elliot, Philip. "9/11 Commissioner criticizes Coulter." ABC News. June 9, 2006. Retrieved on July 10, 2006.
  83. ^ Coulter, Ann. "Party of rapist proud to be Godless." anncoulter.com. June 14, 2006. Retrieved on July 10, 2006.
  84. ^ Coulter, Ann. "Godless causes liberals to pray ... for a book burning." anncoulter.com. June 21, 2006. Retrieved on July 10, 2006.
  85. ^ Coulter, Ann. "Google Books Database: Slander". Google Books. Retrieved on July 16, 2007.
  86. ^ Coulter, Ann. "Interview with Katie Couric on Slander. NBC. Today. June 26, 2002. Reprinted at Drudge Report Archive. Retrieved on October 7, 2006.
  87. ^ Hawkins, John. "An interview with Ann Coulter". Retrieved on July 11, 2006.
  88. ^ Transcript. "Interview with Ann Coulter." CNN (Crossfire). June 30, 2003. Retrieved on July 11, 2006.
  89. ^ Salem, Lee. "Universal Executive Responds to 'E&P' Column on Ann Coulter." Editor & Publisher. June 28, 2006. Retrieved on July 11, 2006.
  90. ^ "Hannity and Colmes." Fox News Channel. June 29 2006
  91. ^ E&P Staff. "Coulter Affirms Previous Statement About Bombing 'NYT' Office" Editor & Publisher June 30 2006. Retrieved on July 11 2006.
  92. ^ This Is War
  93. ^ Jim Ritter, "Muslims see a growing media bias", Chicago Sun Times, September 4 2006
  94. ^ Coulter, Ann (2001-09-28). "Future widows of America: Write your congressman". Jewish World Review. Retrieved 2007-04-16.
  95. ^ Coulter, Ann. "Mineta's Bataan death march", Jewish World Review. February 28 2002. Retrieved on July 11 2006.
  96. ^ Coulter, Ann (2006-11-22). "What can I do to make your flight more uncomfortable?". AnnCoulter.com. Retrieved 2007-04-17.
  97. ^ Coulter, Ann. "This whistle-blower they like", Jewish World Review June 13 2002. Retrieved on October 1, 2006.
  98. ^ Coulter, Ann. "Arab hijackers now eligible for pre-boarding" Jewish World Review April 29 2004. Retrieved on July 11 2006.
  99. ^ Gossett, Sherrie. "Ann Coulter 'Raghead' comments spark blogger blacklash" Cybercast News Service February 13 2006. Retrieved on July 11 2006.
  100. ^ Kurtz, Howard. "Monumental misfire" Washington Post February 14 2006. Retrieved on July 11 2006.
  101. ^ Coulter, Ann. Muslim bites dog. February 15 2006
  102. ^ Tea With Miss Coulter
  103. ^ Coulter, Ann. "Jerry Falwell -- Say Hello to Ronald Reagan" AnnCoulter.com May 16 2007. Retrieved on May 23 2007.
  104. ^ "On MSNBC, Coulter called Gore a "total fag," while Matthews said "we'd love to have her back"". Media Matters. 2006-07-27. Retrieved 2007-10-12. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  105. ^ Staff Writer. "Controversial columnist draws fire for gay slur." ABC News. March 4, 2007. Retrieved on March 6, 2007.
  106. ^ Lopez, Kathryn Jean. "Breaking News: Ann Coulter Was Ann Coulter at CPAC." National Review. March 3, 2007. Retrieved on March 6, 2007.
  107. ^ Isaiah Washington Enters Treatment Facility!
  108. ^ "Ann Coulter uses slur to describe John Edwards @ CPAC." March 2 2007. Retrieved on March 6, 2007.
  109. ^ https://johnedwards.com/action/contribute/coulter Flash video on Edwards' website
  110. ^ a b Staff Writer. "Coulter under fire for anti-gay slur" CNN March 4 2007. Retrieved on March 6 2007.
  111. ^ a b Nagourney, Adam. "G.O.P. Candidates Criticize Slur by Conservative Author" New York Times March 4 2007. Retrieved on March 6 2007.
  112. ^ E&P Staff. "Edwards Campaign Responds to Coulter Calling Him 'Faggot'" Editor & Publisher March 3 2007. Retrieved on March 6 2007.
  113. ^ Staff Writer. "Coulter Under Fire For Anti-Gay Slur" CBS News March 4 2007. Retrieved on March 6 2007.
  114. ^ Staff Writer. "Ann Coulter Fires Back at Critics Over John Edwards 'Faggot' Barb" Fox News March 6 2007. Includes Flash video of exchange. Retrieved on March 6, 2007.
  115. ^ Hamby, Peter. "Companies to pull ads from Coulter's Web site" CNN March 5 2007. Retrieved on March 6 2007.
  116. ^ Astor, Dave. "Two More Newspapers Drop Ann Coulter's Column" Editor & Publisher March 7 2007. Retrieved on March 7 2007.
  117. ^ Staff report. "Statement by Shreveport Editor Today on Dropping Ann Coulter" Editor & Publisher March 8 2007. Retrieved on March 8 2007.
  118. ^ Staff Writer (March 11 2007). "Has Ann Coulter Hit Her Tipping Point?". MSN. Retrieved 2007-03-11. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  119. ^ Hannity and Colmes
  120. ^ a b That Was No Lady -- That Was My Husband
  121. ^ Elizabeth Edwards confronts Ann Coulter
  122. ^ John Edwards' better half?
  123. ^ "Ann Coulter says she won't cooperate in voting probe". Associated Press. November 1 2006. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  124. ^ http://tallahassee.com/legacy/special/blogs/2007/05/conservative-columnist-ann-coulter.html
  125. ^ http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2007/05/11/fbi_profiler_reportedly_helps_ann_coulter/9764/
  126. ^ Lambiet, Jose (August 1 2007). "It's not over for Coulter". Palm Beach Post. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  127. ^ Gurley, George (October 2, 2007) http://www.observer.com/2007/coulter-culture "Coulter Culture"] The New York Observer retrieved 5 October 2007
  128. ^ http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003657196
  129. ^ http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/11/national/main3358373.shtml?source=mostpop_story
  130. ^ http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003657196
  131. ^ http://www.adweek.com/aw/national/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003657345
  132. ^ Denis Prager Show 12 October 2007.
  133. ^ Ann Coulter Wants Jews to Become Christian -- So What? by Dennis Prager (October 16, 2007)
  134. ^ ADL Condemns Ann Coulter's Comment That Jews Need 'To Be Perfected'
  135. ^ http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/12/national/main3361954.shtml

External links

Template:Illustrated Wikipedia

Column archives

Template:Persondata