Landshut east-south bypass

Registration routes for the east-south bypass in Landshut

The east-south bypass Landshut (also southern bypass , south-east bypass or "beer garden variation" ) is the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 (until March 2016 called Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2015) registered local bypass of the city of Landshut , partly on the territory of the district of Landshut leads . From the motorway junction with the A 92 , it is planned as a four-lane continuation of the federal highway 15n to the federal highway B 299 . In a second section it is to be continued in two lanes from the B 299 to the B 15 . In the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 and the draft of a sixth law amending the law on the expansion of trunk roads, it is listed as a section of the B 15.

history

An approx. 16 km long bypass of Landshut in the east in a southerly direction was discussed for the first time on December 6, 2014 by Interior Minister Hermann at a traffic conference in Hinterberg near Dorfen as part of a new route proposal for the B 15n.

Alternative route proposal (December 6, 2014)

Contrary to a previously favored route via Adlkofen , Geisenhausen , Velden and Schwindegg to the A 94 , the route should now first pass Adlkofen and Kumhausen and then run parallel to the existing B 15 to the A 94. The further planning work for this should be transferred from the Autobahn Directorate South Bavaria to the locally responsible state building authorities in Landshut, Freising and Rosenheim . On January 19, 2015, the B 15 new was initially "off" . At a meeting to which District Administrator Peter Dreier invited the mayors of the affected municipalities from the Landshut district and representatives of the City of Landshut for January 23, 2015, the proposal of December 6, 2014 was welcomed and an open examination of the route was requested. The demands were in detail:

• Continuation of a new B 15 as a placeholder route as the southern bypass of Landshut with subsequent three-lane expansion of the B 15.
• Possibility of implementing other more effective, more gentle and cost-saving routes within the framework of further planning.
• The fastest possible implementation of the section from the A 92 to the B 299.
• The fastest possible investigation of traffic efficiency by the Landshut State Building Authority for the following variants:

1. Landshut's southeast bypass from Ohu to Hachelstuhl,
2. Landshut's east bypass on the spatial planning road before Geisenhausen swerving west into the Vilstal with continuation from Münchsdorf on the B 15alt
3. East tangent with offset over the A 92 to the Essenbach / Altheim junction with subsequent continuation to the B 299 and the B 15alt
4. Landshut western bypass with offset via A 92 (new junction Ohu to Landshut-West).

"Oßner proposal" (January 14, 2015)

Route variants discussed between December 2014 and March 2015

After strong criticism of the alternative route proposal, the CSU Bundestag member Florian Oßner brought another 16.3 km long variant into play on January 14, 2015, the central point of which was a four-lane east-south bypass of Landshut, which was initially the new B 15 from the A 92 to the LAs 14 and further to the B 299 at Berggrub. The Isarhangleite was crossed as planned with a tunnel at Eisgrub. A two-lane continuation was planned from the B 299 to the existing route of the B 15 south of Grammelkam. The first section up to the B 299 was considered feasible by 2025, the second by 2030.

"Seehofer variant" (January 30, 2015)

On January 30, 2015, Prime Minister Seehofer announced that the State Chancellery should register two routes for the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan: One of the existing B 15, which was partially expanded to three lanes with bypasses , following the existing B 15 to Haag, and a second following the existing regional planning route of the B 15, new from 1977/78 leaning route. The variant to be implemented should then be determined by means of a comparative test. To the south of Haag , a route along the existing road of the B 15 including the Rosenheim western bypass to the A 8 is planned, with parts being expanded to three lanes. Both variants envisaged an east-south bypass Landshut - to be registered for urgent needs - which was to run in four lanes between the B 15 new / A 92 and the B 299 and from there in two lanes to the B 15. By a cabinet resolution of February 3, 2015, the further east running reporting route to the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan was revoked on March 12, 2013 in the Landshut and Mühldorf districts, and the proposal dated December 6, 2014 for a route running west of the B 15 was withdrawn. For the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan, a placeholder route (without an exact route) should be registered in March, stating the supra-regional importance of the road construction project and a cost estimate. It was then planned to start working out concrete route proposals by the State Building Authority with the involvement of the affected communities in April as part of a public forum.

"Route combination" of the district committee (May 2017)

In its statement on the regional planning procedure for the east-south bypass in Landshut, the district committee of the Landshut district introduced an expanded route concept. This provides:

1. a new four-lane building from the A 92 to the B 299 (similar to the eastern bypass Landshut of the ROV routes 1a / 1b),
2. followed by a four-lane expansion of the B 299 to Geisenhausen,
3. the fastest possible further construction of the B 15new east of Geisenhausen on the east corridor to the B 388 near Velden and
4. a southern bypass close to the city from the B 299 to the B 15 (similar to the southern bypass Landshut of the ROV route 1a) but with a junction at Niederkam for a later connection to a western bypass Landshut .

Points 1, 2 and 4 can also be found in a similar form in the statement by Landshut City Council.

Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030

The registration of the B 15n for the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 (until March 2016 referred to as the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2015) took place in March 2015 as a placeholder route (without a final route) with justification of the supraregional importance of the road construction project and a cost estimate. Landshut's east-south bypass is an essential part of the project registration and part of two alternative route registrations:

• New construction route in the spatial planning
  corridor between Landshut and Haag (project B015-G060-BY)
• Expansion of the existing B 15 with bypasses
  (project B015-G070-BY → this route corresponds to variant 1a discussed in the dialogue forum)

The route differs slightly in terms of the connection to the B 299.

With this registration the further actions in the district and the city of Landshut with regard to a feasibility study for an Osttangente Landshut are suspended . The preparation of a traffic report initiated by the Bavarian State Government is intended to clarify their need in addition to an east-south bypass Landshut.

In the first draft of the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030, the east-south bypass was classified with two projects in the category "New Projects - Urgent Need (VB)" and thus without a priority for removing bottlenecks (VB-E). These are the following projects:

category	project number	Street number	section	Expansion target	Length in km	Investment costs in million euros	Benefit -cost ratio	Environmental and nature conservation expert assessment	Planning situation
VB	B015-G070-BY-T01-BY	B 015	eastern bypass Landshut (A 92 to B 299)	New building with 4 lanes	10.9	213.9	4.0	high	Preliminary draft approved
VB	B015-G070-BY-T02-BY	B 015	southern Landshut bypass (B 299 to B 15)	New building with 2 lanes	6.5	45.8	> 10	medium	without starting planning
total					17.4	259.7

1. ↑ If an endorsement (preliminary draft approved) has been issued, a further route plausibility check can be omitted with regard to the depth of examination (environmental report on BVWP 2030, pages 31ff.).
2. ↑ In February 2012, a preliminary draft of the B 15 with a route from Essenbach A 92 to Geisenhausen B 299 was approved, the cost of which was estimated at € 312.7 million in 2012 by the Southern Bavaria Motorway Directorate.

The following project variants were classified without urgency or were excluded as a variant:

B015-G071-BY-T01-BY B015-G071-BY-T02-BY

B015-G072-BY-T01-BY B015-G072-BY-T02V-BY

B015-G060-BY-T01-BY B015-G060-BY-T05-BY

B015-G061-BY-T01-BY B015-G061-BY-T05-BY

B015-G062-BY-T01-BY B015-G062-BY-T05-BY

The benefit-cost ratio of the two sections is essentially determined by:

• Section 1: East bypass
  • Change in operating costs in passenger and freight transport
  • Change in road safety
  • Change in travel time in passenger traffic
  • Change in reliability
• Section 2: South bypass
  • Change in operating costs in passenger and freight transport
  • Change in travel time in passenger traffic
  • Change in reliability

The benefit from the four parameters mentioned for the section from the A 92 to the B 299 is given as 701.379 million euros. The costs relevant to the calculation of the benefit-cost factor ( “present value of the investment costs relevant to the valuation” ) are put at 172.0 million euros. For the section from the B 299 to the B 15, a benefit of 544.087 million euros is given for the three parameters mentioned and the costs are estimated at 37.7 million euros.

For the environmental and nature conservation assessment, an effective zone width of 300 m on both sides of the axis was to be used in the case of the construction of a new federal highway and with a traffic volume of less than 20,000 vehicles per day.

The Federal Environment Agency (UBA) criticized the first draft bill for the BVWP 2030 to the effect that it missed eleven of the twelve targets set in its own environmental report and suggested that 41 road projects - including the project of an eastern bypass Landshut (B015-G070-BY-T01-BY) - to be deleted from the urgent need.

The publication of the draft bill was followed by a six-week public participation. After evaluating the comments received, a revised cabinet draft was available in which the B 15new plans were included in their previous requirement classification. In the course of the revision, the two projects, the eastern and southern bypasses of Landshut, were assigned to the connection function level (VFS) 1 (regional centers). After the departmental coordination at the end of July 2016, the federal cabinet approved the plan on August 3, 2016.

course

Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003

Topography of the east-south bypass in Landshut

After a cabinet decision of January 19, 2015, the plans for an approx. 16 km long east-south bypass of Landshut were initially continued independently of a registration for the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan.

The east-south bypass Landshut runs mostly in the tertiary hill country. This is partly a very busy terrain. Originally, the route from the B 15 new / A 92 was supposed to cross the Isar with a 395 m long bridge and at Eisgrub it was to be led through the Isar slope with a tunnel.

As early as 2002, as part of the further planning for the B 15 new, it was clear that the crossing of the Isar slope is particularly difficult in terms of nature conservation because of a fauna and flora habitat in this area ( former training site Landshut with Isarleite  - built in 2001). Therefore, the route between the district road LAs 14 and Adlkofen was to be led in a 2.1 km long tunnel near Eisgrub. Quaternary gravel, tertiary gravel, sands and clays are found in this area. Therefore, between 2007 and 2008, a geological, geotechnical, environmental and water management investigation was carried out for a two-tube tunnel with two lanes each. It showed an “alternating bedding and interlocking of cohesive and non-cohesive loose rock ”, the position of which is difficult to determine. In addition, up to three groundwater levels were identified. The subsoil is very heterogeneous and therefore poses a major challenge. In the area of ​​the tunnel, there is a large difference in height to be overcome. Mathematically, this results in a value of around 4 percent for the gradient (longitudinal slope) in the area of ​​the tunnel (for comparison: in the section of the A 92 between the Altdorf and Landshut-Nord motorway exits, the difference in altitude is between 2.3 and 2.4 Percent). A gradient of 4 percent corresponds to the design class EKA1 A according to the rules for the construction of motorways. In the case of longitudinal slopes greater than 2 percent over a length of more than 500 meters, it must be checked whether additional lanes may be required.

Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030

As part of the establishment of the BVWP 2030, a modified route was evaluated. Initially, this follows the previous route from the A 92. After the connection to LAs 14, it crosses the Isarhangleiten with two tunnels compared to the previous plan: a shorter tunnel at Eisgrub and a tunnel between Birnkofen (municipality of Adlkofen) and Frauenberg (city of Landshut). Up to this point the course corresponds roughly to the previous planning from the approved preliminary draft (continuation from Essenbach A 92 to Geisenhausen) of February 6, 2012. But now it is turning to the west. A sub-plan-free junction is planned between Kleinreit and Sittlerhof on State Road 2045. In the further course it is to be connected to the B 299 between Vogel and Gammel. In a second section, it is to be connected to the B 15 between Hachelstuhl and Hausberg. The variant with the two significantly smaller tunnels of 255 m and 395 m in length was also discussed in the context of the dialogue forum “East-South Landshut bypass”. In the meantime, one no longer speaks of two tunnels, but of an ascent to the Isarhangleite and its bridging with an approximately 500 meter long viaduct with a 4.5 percent gradient and an approximately 400 m long tunnel near Frauenberg.

The land take is given as follows:

1. Section from the A 92 to the B 299: 56.1 hectares,
2. Section from the B 299 to the B 15: 25 hectares.

For the new construction of a four-lane federal road, the following gross area requirements (line widths including ancillary areas, embankments and cuttings) are assumed:

• Without hard shoulder: 56 m in moving relief or lowland area or 65 m in strongly moving relief
• with hard shoulder: 60 m in moving relief or lowland area or 70 m in strongly moving relief.

For a two-lane federal road, the values ​​are as follows:

• without hard shoulder: 33.5 m in moving relief or lowland area or 39 m in strongly moving relief
• with hard shoulder: 37.5 m in moving relief or lowland area or 44 m in strongly moving relief.

With a land use of 56.1 hectares and a length of 10.9 km, this results in a gross area requirement (route width) of 51.5 m for section 1. For section 2, a value of 38.5 m is calculated for 25 hectares and 6.5 km.

The routing of Section 1 is classified as highly relevant in the context of the environmental and nature conservation assessment. In the project dossier it says: “It bypasses the city of Landshut to the east and runs over agitated arable land with forest areas. An FFH area is crossed at the narrowest point, but considerable impairment is likely. The project spans the Isar and the ÜSG with a long bridge. In the area of ​​the Isar there is a national habitat corridor (wet) and core areas as well as large areas (BfN) (dry, wet and forest habitats). Large mammal habitats (BfN) are located in the entire project area. Because of the high level of impact on Natura 2000 and because of the impact on the BfN habitat network, the project has a high potential for conflict. "

Along the route there are a number of farms and places at a distance of up to 1,500 m. Which includes:

Ohu - about 200 m Fire - approx. 600 m Wolfsteinerau - approx. 900 m Neudeck - approx. 400 m Sterneck - approx. 400 m Entenau - approx. 200 m Strasbourg - approx. 600 m Eisgrub - <100 m Frauenberg - approx. 200 m Zaitzkofen - approx. 1,000 m Sittlkofen - approx. 400 m Unterbirnkofen - approx. 700 m Birnkofen - approx. 400 m

Point - about 800 m Deutenkofen - approx. 1,100 m Martlhaid - approx. 300 m Girglhaid - approx. 200 m Wood - approx. 100 m Etzhäusl - approx. 500 m Book shafts - approx. 400 m Adlkofen - approx. 1,100 m Kleinreit - approx. 200 m Eglberg - approx. 200 m Wölflkofen - approx. 400 m Hagenau - approx. 300 m Sittlerhof - approx. 200 m

Learning point - approx. 500 m Seethal - approx. 700 m Patzing - approx. 800 m Garsberg - approx. 600 m Jenkofen - approx. 500 m Attenkofen - approx. 100 m Dettenkofen - approx. 200 m Weihbüchl - approx. 400 m Vogen - approx. 200 m Allmannsdorf - approx. 300 m Gammel - approx. 200 m Hillersbach - approx. 500 m Eck adStraß - approx. 500 m

Roßberg - approx. 200 m Berggrub - approx. 800 m Underground - approx. 100 m Obergrub - approx. 800 m Salzdorf - approx. 1,200 m Altenbach - approx. 600 m Berndorf - approx. 400 m Höhenberg - approx. 900 m Grillberg - approx. 800 m Seitenberg - approx. 200 m Siegerstetten - approx. 200 m Niederkam - approx. 300 m Kumhausen - approx. 1,300 m

Obergangkofen - approx. 900 m Preisberg - approx. 1,400 m Eierkam - approx. 1,100 m Walpersdorf - approx. 100 m Grammelkam - approx. 600 m Hachlstuhl - <100 m Oberdessing - approx. 400 m Unterdessing - approx. 900 m Hausberg - <199 m Herbersdorf - approx. 300 m

FFH areas

The following FFH areas are located in the area of ​​the east-south bypass and are listed in the Natura 2000 network of protected areas:

• Guide the lower Isar (DE 7439-371)
• Kleine Vils (DE 7539-371)

costs

As a continuation of the federal highway 15 new, the road construction load lies with the federal government in accordance with the requirements of the federal trunk road law . As a possible cost for an east-south bypass Landshut was estimated in the context of the "Oßner" proposal 310 million euros. A short time later, this value rose to 400 million euros. Initial estimates for the routing registered for the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan amount to 250 to 500 million euros. For the 14 route variants presented as part of the dialogue forum “East-South Landshut Bypass”, cost estimates of between 63 million and 556 million euros were given.

Cost estimates for the
Landshut east-south bypass

Route section	Costs according to MdL Erwin Huber	Costs according to the Landshut State Building Authority	Costs according to MdB Florian Oßner	Costs according to MdB Thomas Gambke	Costs as reported in the dialogue forum	Costs according to the first draft bill for the BVWP 2030
Essenbach / A 92 via the B 299 to Kumhausen / B 15	€ 250 to 300 million	€ 260 million	€ 310 million	€ 500 million	€ 400 million	€ 260 million

For comparison: For the approved preliminary draft for a continuation of the B 15 new from the A 92 to Geisenhausen (15.5 km), the southern Bavaria autobahn directorate estimated a budget of € 312.7 million in 2012.

In 2007, the federal government estimated the costs for the 400 m long Isar bridge at Gretlmühle at 20 to 25 million euros and for the 2.1 km long tunnel at Eisgrub with two tubes and two lanes each at around 100 million euros. In September 2011 the estimates rose to 120 million euros. (For comparison: the 1,470 m long Josef Deimer Tunnel near Landshut with a tube with two lanes and no hard shoulder cost 66 million euros).

The budget for the two sub-routes registered for the BVWP 2030 was put at € 260 million. Significant cost increases are already to be expected, since both the Essenbach market and the city and district of Landshut as well as numerous local, state and federal politicians are demanding that the B 15n route from the motorway intersection with the A 92, which, according to current planning, will later split up the places Ohu and Ohu-Siedlung. The same has already been addressed to politicians in the Transport Committee of the Bundestag and to Transport Minister Dobrindt. Such an enclosure had already been discussed in July 2007.

At the fourth meeting of the dialogue forum, changes to the structural design (e.g. a long viaduct instead of a road embankment) were made due to the expected environmental requirements for the crossing of the Isar valley and the Isar slope, which will have an impact on costs as well as a four-lane expansion of the B 299 to Geisenhausen, which is also considered necessary, as well as further upgrading to Vilsbiburg .; In addition, the main route 1b is 7.1 kilometers longer than the east-south bypass Landshut, which was registered for the BVWP 2030. If these measures are “necessary and technically justified” and the requirement of “economic efficiency and thrift is sufficient”, the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure has signaled a possible assumption of costs.

The route variants 1a, 1b and 1c from the dialogue forum were introduced into the regional planning procedure in March 2017. Their estimated costs are 261, 305 and 303 million euros. Should the 2.1 km long tunnel from the approved preliminary draft from 2009 be implemented - this is not part of the regional planning procedure - additional costs of 70 million euros and annual maintenance costs of 1.1 million euros would be expected. The total cost of such a tunnel would be 120 million euros.

Cost estimates for variants 1a, 1b, and 1c from the regional planning procedure
as well as possible additional costs for additional measures

Route section	Variation 1a	Variant 1b	Variant 1c
Costs according to the dialogue forum	261 to. €	€ 305 million	€ 303 million
Additional costs for “lid” at Ohu	€ 8 million
Additional costs for 2.1 km long tunnel (2012 costs)	€ 70 million
Additional costs for RQ 28 for the eastern bypass	?	?	?
Total costs	€ 339 million	€ 383 million	€ 381 million

1. ↑ A new four-lane building with RQ 21 (without hard shoulder) was introduced into the spatial planning procedure by the Landshut State Building Authority. The preliminary draft of the Southern Bavaria Motorway Directorate, approved in 2009, provided for a new building with hard shoulder.

At the end of September 2017, the state building authority in Landshut named costs of EUR 0.8 million (+ EUR 0.1 million annual maintenance) for an enclosure. The lower costs are explained by the fact that the cover would be part of the necessary weighting against the buoyancy by the groundwater. Transport Minister Dobrindt also announced at an on-site appointment that the enclosure should be incorporated into the plan approval procedure.

The framework investment plan for 2016 to 2020 is currently in progress. At the moment, a total of 408 million euros is set in the draft budget for 2018 in Bavaria. For medium-term financial planning, the amounts for the following years are EUR 313 million (2019), EUR 279 million (2020) and EUR 289 million (2021). On the other hand, there is a financial requirement for ongoing and fixed projects for Bavaria from the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 of 4.9 billion euros and for projects from urgent needs and urgent needs with bottleneck removal of 7.2 billion euros. For the BVWP 2030, the costs were discounted to the reference year 2012 on the basis of an annual cost increase rate of 2.5 percent.

Traffic volume

Plan case of the project dossiers from BVWP 2030 registration

The evaluation of the two sub-routes that were registered for the BVWP 2030 was carried out on the basis of the following "future average traffic loads":

1. new four-lane section from the A 92 to B 299: 10,000 vehicles per day (19 percent of which are truck traffic),
2. Two-lane new section from the B 299 to the B 15: 7,000 vehicles per day (19 percent of which are truck traffic).

These traffic loads are characterized as induced traffic. This means additional traffic, which z. B. is due to the expansion of the traffic routes or other improvements in the transport offer.

For comparison: between the Schierling Nord and Schierling Süd junctions, an average of almost 10,000 vehicles per day traveled on the B 15new in 2014 (at peak times up to 13,000). Of these, 1,600 (at peak times up to 2,700) vehicles are assigned to heavy goods traffic.

A spatial planning evaluation according to Module C of the evaluation methodology of the BVWP 2030 was not carried out for both sections. Concerning urban development importance it says for section 1: “The project has no urban development importance.” For section 2 it also says: “If the measure is considered, there will be only minor differences in traffic intensities compared to the situation in the reference case on all affected sections of the route , occur. Effectiveness or impairments can therefore not be shown. Urban planning potential can therefore probably not be activated or only at a low level. "

Landshut transport hub

DTV mean values ​​of the Landshut State Building Authority according to the traffic censuses 2000, 2005 and 2010

DTV mean values ​​for the Landshut district according to the traffic censuses 2005/2010

Landshut is an important hub for national road traffic. North of the urban area runs the federal highway 92, which  crosses the federal highways 15 and 299, which run through the urban area. In addition, the B 11 connects Landshut with Munich.

The tenth largest rail-road transshipment station in Germany is connected to this node, which is located in the middle of Landshut on Hofmark-Aich-Strasse (B 15). A total of 69,109 swap bodies (truck trailers) were loaded here in 2014 . The handling volume has increased significantly since 2010. A large part of the freight volume comes from the integration into the supply chain of the automotive industry (BMW locations Landshut and Dingolfing). With the construction of the new BMW warehouses in Wallersdorf and Bruckberg, a further increase in handling traffic is expected.

The B 299 forms the municipal boundary between Landshut and Ergolding in the area between the A 92 Landshut-Nord motorway exit and Altdorfer Straße (Ergolding / St 2143). A supply center for the automotive industry is currently being built here. After completion, it is assumed that heavy goods traffic in this area will increase by 300 trucks per day.

Traffic connection of the Landshut container station

For regional road traffic, Landshut serves as a crossing point for State Road 2045 and as a connecting point for State Road 2143 to Ergolding and the district roads LA 26 to Altdorf , LA 52 to Altdorf or Ergolding and LAs 14 at Auloh to Niederaichbach . As an enclave , Landshut is located in the middle of the district of the same name and divides it into a north and a south half.

Road traffic crosses the Isar in three places in Landshut:

• once in the west from Luitpoldstrasse to Wittstrasse
• twice in the center on Podewilsstraße and
• twice in the east over the Piflaser bridge and the Konrad-Adenauer-Brücke in the area of ​​Konrad-Adenauer-Straße.

Road traffic in the city of Landshut is characterized by source and destination traffic. In contrast to the Landshut district, the commuter balance in the city of Landshut is positive. As of June 30, 2014 (2013), the in-commuter surplus was 9,683 (9,757) people and has remained almost constant over the past ten years at nine to ten thousand people. In 2014 (2013) there were 23,065 (22,478) in- commuters and 13,382 (12,721) out-commuters. This is 3,642 (+19 percent) inbound commuters and 3,278 (+33 percent) outbound commuters more than ten years ago.

For the Landshut district the values ​​are as follows: The commuter balance is negative and as of June 30, 2013 (2012) the out-commuter surplus was 17,559 (17,777) people. For the past ten years it has fluctuated between 17,000 and 21,000 people. In 2013 (2012) there were 31,904 (30,829) in-commuters and 49,462 (48,606) out-commuters. This is 7,256 (+29 percent) inbound commuters and 6,818 (+16 percent) outbound commuters more than ten years ago.

Representation of the commuter flows from the municipalities of the Landshut district to the city of Landshut and vice versa. As of June 30, 2016

Representation of the commuter flows from the municipalities of the Landshut district to the city of Vilsbiburg and vice versa. As of June 30, 2016

Representation of the commuter flows from the municipalities of the Landshut district to the Essenbach market and vice versa. As of June 30, 2016

Representation of the commuter flows from the municipalities of the Landshut district to the Geisenhausen market and vice versa. As of June 30, 2016

From June 18 to 28, 2016, the Landshut State Building Authority counted the transport of dangerous goods in the urban area of ​​Landshut. During this period, the average number of dangerous goods transported was as follows:

• B 15: max. 20 trips per day,
• B 299: max. 203 trips per day.

DTV mean values ​​according to traffic census 2010 in comparison of the regions

Road type	territorial corporation	Total vehicles	Change compared to 2005 in percent	Freight traffic	Change compared to 2005 in percent
Highways	Bavaria	46.111	−2.6	8,899	+1.6
	Lower Bavaria	33,485	+5.9	7,194	+11.4
	Landshut district	-	-	-	-
	State building authority Landshut	29,709	+6.0	4,469	+4.5
Federal highways	Bavaria	9640	+2.3	1,133	+3.9
	Lower Bavaria	9.006	+2.7	1,320	+7.5
	Landshut district	10,039	−1.2	1,290	+1.1
	State building authority Landshut	9,339	−1.4	1,513	−4.6
State roads	Bavaria	3,851	+0.8	323	+4.4
	Lower Bavaria	3.713	+6.3	329	+1.9
	Landshut district	3,875	+9.9	363	+5.1
	State building authority Landshut	3,729	+10.4	359	−3.6
County roads	Bavaria	1,783	+1.4	140	+0.4
	Lower Bavaria	1,545	+7.1	128	−5.9
	Landshut district	1,572	+9.0	136	+12.5
	State building authority Landshut	1,593	+3.7	138	−2.5

Private and local public transport in Landshut

The volume of private transport in Landshut has increased in recent years. Essential for this are:

• Increase in the number of inhabitants in both the city and the Landshut district
• Increase in the number of inbound and outbound commuters
• Increase in the number of vehicles
• Decline in the number of passengers using local public transport

While the population of the city of Landshut was 59,513 in 2001, the number of inhabitants rose to 66,179 by 2013 (with 69,220 this was another 3,041 more as of December 31, 2015). For the Landshut district, these values ​​are as follows: 144,504 in 2001 and 150,316 as of December 31, 2013.

The number of employees subject to social security contributions who drive to Landshut every day but do not live there (commuters) rose to 23,142 by June 30, 2014. That is 6,079 more than in 1999. The largest group of commuters comes from the Landshut district. The commuter groups are distributed as follows:

• Landshut district: 14,848
• Dingolfing-Landau district : 1,852
• District of Freising : 997
• District of Erding : 567
• District Kelheim : 527

The number of employees subject to social security contributions who live in the city of Landshut but work outside Landshut (commuters) rose to 13,391. That is 4,362 more than in 1999. Most of them work in the Landshut district. Overall, the outcommuters are distributed as follows:

• Landshut district: 5,380
• City of Munich : 2.085
• District of Freising: 1.619
• Dingolfing-Landau district: 1.077
• District of Erding: 639

Around 1980 the number of cars in Landshut was 19,379. From 2000 to 2007, the number had grown from 30,460 to 35,039, fell to 30,835 in the course of the financial and economic crisis in 2008, and then rose again to 33,788 vehicles by 2014. In 2014, the total number of motor vehicles (cars, motorcycles, buses, trucks, tractors and other vehicles) was 39,542.

This contrasts with a significant decrease in the number of people transported in local public transport . After 9.188 million in 1999, the number of passengers carried in 2014 was 6.664 million, 27.5 percent fewer. From 2013 to 2014, passenger numbers fell by 4.4 percent.

The traffic volume in the inner city of Landshut resulting from the source and destination traffic is subject to extreme daily fluctuations: in the morning and in the afternoon this reaches peak values ​​during rush hour traffic. In the times in between, it is much lower, only to drop significantly in the evening hours.

Traffic development

Freight traffic flows in the Landshut area according to traffic censuses 2000/2010

Vehicle traffic flows in the Landshut area according to traffic censuses 2000/2010/2015

In January 2014, the head of the building department, Johannes Doll, presented the results of a joint report by the Landshut building department and the Landshut State Building Authority to the Landshut Building Senate. It was investigated what effects a provisional end of the B 15 new would have on the LAs 14. As a result, it was found that this would not significantly increase the volume of traffic at the barracks junction and on Niedermayerstraße, since the corresponding traffic in the direction of Schönbrunn, Landshut University, Sparkassenakademie and Agricultural Education Center would take the route via the B15new.

For traffic development in the east of Landshut see also:

→ Main article : Osttangente Landshut

A 92 : According to the 2015 (2010) traffic census, 35,200 (32,700) to 36,600 (34,000) vehicles drove daily in the Landshut / Essenbach area. Between Landshut Nord and Landshut West, between 41,500 (38,500) and 39,200 (36,400) vehicles per day traveled daily and around 44,100 (41,000) vehicles per day between Landshut West and Moosburg Nord. As a result, the extensive traffic on the A 92 increased significantly by an average of 2,800 vehicles per day. A further increase is to be expected due to the industrial supply and distribution centers mentioned in the “Landshut transport hub” section, which have arisen in the Bruckberg, Ergolding and Wallersdorf areas.

B 15 : According to the traffic census 2015 (2010) in the Hofmark-Aich-Straße / Luitpoldstraße area, the traffic load was 20,500 (24,500) to 20,000 (26,500) vehicles per day. In the direction of Kumhausen it decreased to 13,300 (13,500) vehicles per day and in the direction of Ergolding it increased to just under 29,000 (21,000) vehicles per day. After Ergolding at the junction with the A 92 there were only about 16,600 (13,200) vehicles per day.

The 2015 traffic census at the counting point near Neufahrn in Niederbayern showed a decrease of around 2,500 vehicles compared to the 2010 census. This is likely to be due to the section of the B 15 new that was opened to traffic between 2010 and 2015. In contrast, the counting point to Essenbach in the direction of Landshut showed an increase of around 4,500 vehicles for this period. The increase in the further course at the junction with the A 92 was slightly lower, with around 3,400 vehicles. On the other hand, there was an extreme increase in the urban area between the counting stations at the Ergolding connection and at the Harlander junction (the two large industrial and commercial areas of Landshut and Ergolding are located in this area), where the number of vehicles rose between almost 11,000 and 8,100. It should be noted in this regard that the 2010 census showed a decrease of 7,600 and 6,300 vehicles respectively compared to 2005. South of Landshut near Münchsdorf, the traffic figures and thus also the large-scale traffic fell slightly by around 600 vehicles between 2015 and 2010.

B 11 : According to the 2015 traffic census (2010), the traffic load in thedirection of Tiefenbach was around 16,100 (17,600) vehicles per day.

Change in traffic volume on the B 15 in the Landshut area determined during the recurring traffic censuses from 2010 and 2015

Change in traffic volume on the B 299 in the Landshut area determined during the recurring traffic censuses of 2010 and 2015

B 299 : North of Landshut, it is routed as an offset between the Altdorf and Landshut-Nord junctions on the A 92. It crosses the urban area on Konrad-Adenauer-Straße, where traffic jams regularly occur, as it narrows in both directions from two to one lane per direction. According to the 2015 (2010) traffic census, the traffic load there was just under 27,000 (24,000) vehicles per day. At Landshut-Nord there were around 14,400 (18,500) and in the east of Landshut at Weihbüchl (exit Landshut towards Vilsbiburg ) around 13,650 (13,700) vehicles per day. On April 13, 2015, construction work began to renovate the bridge on the B 299 over the B 15. Contrary to previously expressed fears regarding the expected traffic chaos due to the high traffic load on the B 299, the traffic continued without disruptions even after the one-sided closure in the direction of the A 92. The traffic coming from Vilsbiburg was diverted over the B 15 and led to the access of the A 92 near Essenbach.

In the north of Landshut at the Pfeffenhausen, Weihmichl and Arth traffic counts, the 2010 traffic census showed an increase of 700 to 3,000 vehicles compared to 2005, but the figures for the 2015 count were significantly higher, at between 1,600 and 4,200 vehicles back again. From 2005 to 2010 there was an increase in traffic of 1,000 vehicles south of Landshut on the ascent to Weihbüchl. In the 2015 census compared to 2010, the volume of traffic and thus the long-range traffic to the south remained almost unchanged.

B 15n (east-south bypass Landshut): Currently the B 15n joins the B 15 at Ergoldsbach near Kläham. The combined traffic volume of the B 15n and B 15 in Ergolding in 2015 at the junction with the A 92 was around 16,600 vehicles per day. According to current forecasts, as of May 2015, the Landshut State Building Authority is assuming 24,000 vehicles per day when the B 15 new is connected to the A 92.
The Landshut State Building Authority stated in October 2014: "The new four-lane B 15 is primarily used for long-distance traffic, better connections to Eastern Bavaria, the connection of the A 92, A 93, A 94 and A 8 motorways" and the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Transport added on December 4, 2014: "It is not suitable on its own to also be able to take up the destination and source traffic to Landshut and the inland traffic within Landshut" . In the project dossier on which the registration of the eastern Landshut bypass (continuation of the B 15new beyond the A 92) for the BVWP 2030 was based, a daily sales volume of 10,000 vehicles is assumed. This corresponds to the mean value of the average daily traffic load on all federal roads in the Landshut district from 2005 and 2010.

Traffic forecasts

Forecast figures from an expert report for the city of Landshut

Area	Traffic volume on working days in 2014	Forecast for 2030 with zero solution	Forecast for 2030 when the Landshut east-south bypass is implemented	Forecast for 2030 with the realization of a ring closure (east-south bypass plus west bypass)
B 15: Luitpoldstrasse (between Rennweg and Schwimmschulstrasse)	27,500	28,500	25,800	24,000
B 15: Luitpoldstraße (from Schwimmschulstraße to Isar)	22,500	24,100	20,400	16,400
B 15 / B 11: Wittstrasse (between tunnel and Kupfereck)	34,000	36,000	31,100	27,500
B 15: Veldener Strasse	15,900	17,300	11,600	10,800

Hints:

• The forecast range of fluctuation is 500 vehicles in each case.
• Coming from Veldener Strasse (B 15), Luitpoldstrasse but also the B 11 and the Josef-Deimer-Tunnel (neither mentioned in the figures above) one reaches Wittstrasse along which various parking lots and multi-storey car parks can be found Walking downtown; including z. B. the Grieserwiese with 1,300 parking spaces alone. The two parking garages in Wittstrasse offer space for a total of 543 vehicles.

On December 13, 2018, the Landshut State Building Authority held an information event on the upcoming planning approval procedure for the first construction phase of the eastern Landshut bypass. The following traffic relief forecasts were made for the year 2035:

• Konrad-Adenauer-Strasse minus 3,200 vehicles per day
• Kaserneneck minus 5,000 vehicles per day
• LAs 14 at the school center minus 2,500 vehicles per day
• LAs 14 east of Auloh increase in traffic by 3,000 vehicles per day.

Connection quality

Accessibility for source and destination traffic from the city and district of Landshut
as well as for national traffic

Starting point	Routing over	End point	Route length with Osttangente ( OT )	Route length with east-south bypass Landshut (B 15n)	Distance in the zero case
Geisenhausen	B 299, Konrad-Adenauer-Strasse	Transition from Siemensstrasse to Industriestrasse	-	-	approx. 10.7 km
	B 299, B 15n Plantrasse 1b (1c), St 2045, Kondrad-Adenauer-Straße		-	approx. 15.7 km	-
	B 299, B 15n Plantrasse 1b (1c), LAs 14, Kondrad-Adenauer-Strasse		-	approx. 22.5 km	-
	B 299, B 15n Plantrasse 1b (1c), AS Essenbach / B 15n, A 92, AS Landshut-Nord (A 92)		-	approx. 25.7 km	-
	B 299, B 15n Plantrasse 1b (1c), AS Essenbach / B 15n, A 92, AS Landshut-Essenbach (A 92), B 15		-	approx. 23.8 km	-
Vilsbiburg	Gerzen, Aham, Kröning, Niederviehbach (Niederaichbach), Wörth, Moosthann, B 15	AS Ergoldsbach / B 15n	-	-	approx. 47.3 (49) km
	B 299, B 15n plan case 1b (1c), B 15n		-	approx. 35 (33.3) km	-
	B 299, LAs 14, OT , B 15, Essenbach, B 15 (B 15n)		approx. 37.6 (37.3) km	-	-
	B 299, LAs 14, OT , B 15; AS Landshut-Essenbach (A 92), A 92, AS Essenbach / B 15n, B 15n		approx. 37.6 km	-	-
	B 299, Konrad-Adenauer-Strasse, B 15, Essenbach, B 15 (B 15n)		-	-	approx. 37.9 (37.6) km
	B 299, Konrad-Adenauer-Straße, AS Landshut-Nord (A 92), A 92, AS Landshut-Essenbach (A 92), B 15 (B 15n)		-	-	approx. 40.6 (40.3) km
AS Landshut-Nord (A 92)	A 92, AS Landshut-Essenbach (A 92), B 15, OT	Lurzenhof	approx. 8.35 km	-	-
	B 299, B 15, OT		approx. 6.75 km	-	-
	B 299, Konrad-Adenauer-Straße, Niedermayerstraße		-	-	approx 6.4 km
	A 92, AS Essenbach / B 15n, B 15n, LAs 14		-	approx. 15 km	-
Vilsbiburg	Gerzen, Aham, Niederviehbach, St 2074	Dingolfing	-	-	approx. 35.25 km
	Gerzen, Aham, Frontenhausen		-	-	approx. 33.75 km
	B 299, B 15n plan case 1b (1c), A 92, AS Dingolfing-Mitte (A 92)		-	approx. 45.5 (43.85) km	-
Vilsbiburg	B 299, B 15n plan case 1b + 1c	Connection of B 15n to B 15	-	approx. 20.2 km	-
	B 299, St 2054, Altfraunhofen		-	-	approx. 17.5 km
Aham	Aham, Kröning, St 2045, Konrad-Adenauer-Straße	Transition from Siemensstrasse to Industriestrasse	-	-	approx. 26.50 km
	Aham, Kröning, Adlkofen, B 15n Planfall 1c (1b), B 299, Konrad-Adenauer-Straße		-	approx. 35 km (approx. 29.5 km)	-
	Aham, Kröning, Adlkofen, B 15n Planfall 1c (1b), AS Essenbach / B 15n, A 92, AS Landshut-Essenbach (A 92), B 15		-	approx. 33 km (approx. 34.5 km)	-
	Aham, Kröning, Adlkofen, B 15n Planfall 1c (1b), AS Essenbach / B 15n, A 92, AS Landshut-Nord (A 92), B 299		-	approx. 34.5 km (approx. 36 km)	-
AS Landshut-Nord (A 92)	A 92, AS Landshut-Essenbach (A 92), B 15, OT	Auloh (western or eastern access)	approx. 9.8 to 10.75 km	-	-
	B 299, Konrad-Adenauer-Straße, Niedermayerstraße		-	-	approx. 7.85 to 8.8 km
	A 92, AS Essenbach / B 15n, B 15n, LAs 14		-	approx. 13.55 to 12.6 km	-
Unterglaim	Ergoldinger Straße, AS Landshut / Essenbach (A 92), A 92, AS Essenbach / B 15n, B 15n, LAs 14	Lurzenhof	-	approx. 16.45 km	-
	Ergoldinger Strasse, Altheim, B 15, OT		approx. 10 km	-	-
	Ergolding, Rottenburger Strasse, B 15, OT		approx. 7.2 km	-	-
	St 2143, B 299, Konrad-Adenauer-Strasse, Niedermayerstrasse		-	-	approx. 10.5 km
Essenbach	AS Essenbach / B 15n, B 15n, LAs 14	Lurzenhof	-	approx. 10.4 km	-
	B 15, Konrad-Adenauer Straße (B 299), Niedermayerstraße		-	-	approx. 11.25 km
	B 15, OT		approx. 7.85 km	-	-
Essenbach	B 15 Konrad-Adenauer Straße (B 299), Niedermayerstraße, St 2045	Adlkofen (Kröning)	-	-	approx. 16.7 (24.15) km
	B 15n plan case 1b, St 2045		-	approx. 11.85 (19.3) km	-
	B 15n plan case 1c, St 2045		-	approx. 10.5 (17.95) km	-
	B 15, OT , Am Lurzenhof, St 2045		approx. 14.2 (21.65) km	-	-

Construction progress / planning status

Construction load

At first it was unclear in whose construction load the further construction of the B 15n as the east-south bypass of Landshut would be and who would take over the planning and financing. On January 30, the Bavarian State Chancellery announced that it would be registered for the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan for urgent needs. The Federal Republic of Germany is named as the project sponsor. In the first draft of the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 presented on March 16, 2016, the east-south bypass was classified as urgent in two sub-projects. At the beginning of December 2016, the corresponding law on the expansion of trunk roads was passed by the Bundestag.

timeline

In 2015, the connection of the B 15n to the A 92 was expected in 2019. In September 2017 it was announced by the Autobahn Directorate South Bavaria that completion would be postponed to 2020. Erwin Huber , member of the Bavarian State Parliament, spoke of the subsequent east-south bypass not being completed before 2025. In the event of a classification in the highest priority level of the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan, Bavaria's Interior Minister Herrmann is aiming for Landshut's construction law for the east-south bypass by 2019 what would enable construction to start in 2020 with the goal of completion by 2025. In July 2015, he corrected himself and named the year 2030 as the earliest date for construction to start; The Bund Naturschutz even spoke of 2034, should not be sued.

Route definition

Since June 22nd, 2015, a dialogue forum has been working out recommendations for routing in the Landshut area. In addition to the federal traffic route plan relevant east-south bypass of Landshut, local traffic projects in municipal building loads with a small-scale traffic function are also considered. For the latter, project sponsors can be the Free State of Bavaria, the Landshut district, the city of Landshut or individual municipalities. Manfred Dreier, deputy head of the Landshut state building authority, does not expect a route recommendation by the government of Lower Bavaria until mid-2017 at the earliest . On September 9, 2016, the Landshut State Building Authority announced that surveys of the fauna and flora in the area of ​​the three route variants 1a, 1b and 1c from the dialogue forum had started as the basis for an environmental impact study.

For the beginning of 2017, an information event is planned by the district on the subject of the "East-South bypass Landshut". In mid-January 2017, a joint public meeting of the municipal councils of the municipalities of Altfraunhofen and Geisenhausen took place in the large conference room of the Landshut District Office to discuss possible route variants. While the local council of Altfraunhofen was in favor of variant 1a and against variant 1c, the Geisenhausen council has not yet made a decision.

Ideas competitions

On January 31, 2011, the Bavarian Chamber of Engineers-Bau, together with the Supreme Building Authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, launched a competition for the design of a road bridge (Isar crossing) with two-way lanes in two-way traffic in which the boundary conditions from the construction project for a B 15n were adopted were. The submitted designs were to be evaluated according to the following criteria:

• Ecological quality,
• Economic quality,
• Sociocultural quality,
• Constructive quality.

The award ceremony for the three winners of the competition took place on June 9, 2011 as part of the Bavarian Climate Week.

Implementation planning

As early as November 19, 2016, engineering services under the following title were tendered by the Landshut State Building Authority as part of a European tender process (B16E7727001-01), for which the submission deadline ended on December 15, under the following title: B 15 new East-South bypass Landshut property planning traffic facilities BA I and II . The estimated order value was given as 775,000 euros and the contract duration was March 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018. The route lengths and the construction were described as follows:

• BA I - A 92 to LAs 14s: For this approx. 2.4 km long section, both a connection to the groundwater trough at the motorway junction of the B 15neu with the A 92 and a connection to the LAs 14s that are not partially planned must be planned. In between, a bridge structure for the crossing under the railway line (Landshut-Plattling) and the state road 2074 as well as the culvert of a brook has to be considered. The Isar is crossed with a 400 m long bridge.
• BA II - LAs 14s to B 299: This section has a length of approx. 8.3 km. In these plans it must be taken into account that in some cases "areas of great nature conservation importance" are crossed. The very steeply rising FFH area of ​​the Isarhangleite is named as a "difficult area" for which a technical solution has to be worked out. The connection to the state road 2045 near Adlkofen is to be designed without a partial plan, the subsequent connection to the B 299 near Hohenegglkofen, however, without a plan. Valley bridges and tunnels are necessary because of the heavily moved terrain.

These two sections, which are to be assigned to the eastern bypass of Landshut, have two lanes with four lanes, without planning a hard shoulder with a corresponding connection to the subordinate road network. The construction of the entire east-south bypass Landshut is planned in three construction phases. The third construction phase (BA III - B 299 to B 15, the so-called southern Landshut bypass) is not part of the tender. The award took place on March 3, 2017.

Another tender followed on December 22, 2016 (B16E7727001-02), which includes the creation of an accompanying landscape maintenance plan (LBP) for construction sections I and II for the design and approval planning. With an estimated order volume of 410,000 euros, these architectural and engineering services also include the FFH compatibility test and exemption test. The service period is from April 3, 2017 to June 30, 2018. The award took place on April 24, 2017.

Another European tender (B16E7727001-03) started on February 13, 2017 for the project and structural planning of the K 49/1 building as an approx. 400 m long eight-span Isar bridge with an estimated order value of 670,000 euros. The service period is from May 22nd, 2017 to September 30th, 2018. The award took place on May 22, 2017.

In the first construction phase of the eastern bypass, a 573 long groundwater basin would be created. This would connect to the 970 m long section currently under construction (2017), which is part of the Ergoldsbach – Essenbach A 92 construction section. The Landshut – Plattling railway line is crossed under this and the Ohu area is crossed with state road 2074 at a low level. For this purpose, the state road at the intersection with the B 15 new would be raised by 2.5 meters. The Mühlbach, to be relocated to the south, would pass under the B 15neu, which rises to the Isar with noise barriers on both sides and spans the Isar with dykes and parts of the alluvial forest with a 380-meter-long bridge. At Dirnau it would be connected to LAs 14, which remains at the previous level.

As a noise protection measure, an embankment of six meters is planned in the Ohu area, the cost of which is estimated at around two million euros; alternatively, politicians are currently discussing an enclosure (“cover”). In the spatial planning procedure that has been initiated, “a cover (= housing) on ​​the trough of the groundwater trough has not yet been provided”. The Federal Ministry of Transport has commissioned the Landshut state building authority to investigate the technical possibilities for an enclosure and the associated costs. In March 2019, the Landshut State Building Authority presented its plans for the first construction phase to the municipal council in Essenbach. This includes the housing. However, the issue of noise protection remains controversial and the Essenbach market council is calling for further improvements in the run-up to the opening of a plan approval procedure.

On July 7, 2017, the project planning engineering structures and structural planning for the "structure K 48/1 groundwater trough with bridge St 2074" was tendered under the reference number B16E7727001-04. In order to influence the existing groundwater as little as possible, the approx. 550 m long groundwater basin should run as close to the surface as possible. The award took place on December 4, 2017.

Spatial planning procedure

Various procedural stages have to be passed through to obtain the building permit. First of all to carry out a spatial planning procedure (ROV), which became necessary due to the cancellation of the planning approval decision of February 16, 1991 for the Geisenhausen – Haarbach section of the B 15 new with Vilstalspange by decision of the government of Lower Bavaria of January 26, 2012, to review the route concept south of Vilsbiburg up to A 94 / B 15. In addition, an environmental impact assessment and changes to the regional plan are necessary. A continuation of the B 15 from the A 94 to the A 8 would require an additional regional planning procedure.

Process levels following the requirements planning

Procedural level	Administrative procedure or planning stage
Spatial planning	Preliminary investigations, preparation of the spatial planning documents
	Regional planning procedure (ROV)
	Line determination
Admission	Draft planning, approval planning, preparation of the plan approval documents
	Plan approval procedure
construction	Implementation planning
	Construction work (if financing is secured and approved)

In December 2016, the documents for a regional planning procedure were in preparation. The aim was to complete this by mid-2017. On March 10, the government of Lower Bavaria initiated the regional planning procedure (ROV) at the request of the Landshut State Building Authority. The subject of the proceedings is exclusively the route of the east-south bypass Landshut. The necessary new construction and expansion measures for the further course up to the A 8 near Rosenheim are to be clarified during the term of the BVWP 2030.

The following routes from the dialogue forum were supplied to the ROV for assessment in terms of regional planning:

• 1a with approx. 16.9 km - 8 bridge structures (longer than 100 m), approx. 1775 m total length / 2 tunnels with approx. 650 m total length,
• 1b with approx. 23.8 km - 5 bridge structures (longer than 100 m), approx. 1245 m total length / 2 tunnels with approx. 650 m total length,
• 1c with approx. 22.3 km - 3 bridge structures (longer than 100 m), approx. 650 m total length / 2 tunnels with approx. 650 m total length.

With regard to cases 1b and 1c, two alternative routes are being considered in the Altfraunhofen area:

• Variants "North" and
• "South" variant.

The districts of Holzhäuseln and Moorloh are bypassed once in the north and in the south. The northern variant is favored by the Landshut State Building Authority.

For the ascent to the Isarhangleiten , three height planning variants are named, which can be applied to all variants mentioned for assessment:

• A: short bridge with an adjoining green bridge to connect the divided FFH area,
• B: long valley bridge with complete bridging of the FFH area,
• C: long and deep tunnel.

The developer does not use variant C within the framework of the ROV.

For the section from the motorway junction near Essenbach to the B 299, a standard cross-section RQ 21 and for the further course from the B 299 to the B 15 a standard cross-section RQ 11.5 is provided. In cases 1a and 1b, the junctions with LAs 14 and St 2045 are executed without a partial plan; in the case of variant 1c also the junction with the B 299. The connection to the B 15 will follow the same plan. The environmental impact assessment required for a later plan approval procedure is already carried out within the framework of the ROV.

In the course of the opening of the regional planning procedure, the municipality of Altfraunhofen commissioned an environmental report against the planned route of the B 15 new through the Kleine Vilstal (ROV routes 1b / 1c). Around 500 comments were received on the regional planning procedure.

On February 8, 2018, the regional planning procedure was concluded with a positive regional planning assessment subject to conditions for plan cases 1b and 1c. Plan case 1a and the dam solution for crossing the Isarleite and the sub-variant south near Altfraunhofen were rejected. This means that the route for the Landshut bypass from the BVWP 2030 for the so-called expansion of the existing B 15 with bypasses (project B015-G070-BY) was classified as not spatially compatible. In the environmental report, which was drawn up as part of the preparation of the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030, this southern bypass was classified as having medium relevance for the environment and nature conservation. The main reason for a negative regional planning assessment, in addition to the existing bentonite deposits, was “considerably negative effects on nature and the landscape”.

In contrast, the same environmental report rated the environmental and nature conservation relevance of the eastern bypass of Landshut as high . Up to the connection with the B 299, route 1b corresponds to this so-called new route in the spatial planning corridor between Landshut and Haag (project B015-G060-BY) . The spatial compatibility of variants 1b and 1c is essentially based on four factors:

• the classification in the priority requirements of the BVWP 2030 or the Road Expansion Act,
• an additional Isar crossing, which increases the attractiveness of the eastern and southeastern sub-areas of the Landshut region,
• a relief of the city of Landshut from supra-regional through traffic and
• a better connection of the economic area Vilsbiburg to the A 92.

The following four points are named as essential requirements:

• adequate noise protection for the people affected by the project,
• Minimizing the space consumption to what is absolutely necessary,
• better connection to the downstream road network as well
• Implementation with construction phases in quick succession in order to reduce the stress on people during the construction phase.

Plan approval procedure

On May 22, 2017, at the fifth meeting of the East-South Landshut bypass dialogue forum, a possible date was summer for the initiation of a plan approval procedure for the first construction section of the eastern Landshut bypass from the motorway intersection of the B 15 new with the A 92 crossing the Isar to LAs 14 Called 2018. A prior clarification of the further course of the route is not considered necessary for this. At the end of September, the Landshut State Building Authority announced that the plan approval procedure was to be started in early 2018 ^{[out of date]} .

In April 2018, the Landshut district office assumed that the procedure would be opened in the course of the summer and it was believed that a connection to LAs 14 (1st construction phase) would be possible by 2024 . On December 13, 2018, the Landshut State Building Authority held an information event on this. while the preparation of the documents for its plan approval procedure was in preparation. A year later than initially expected, the plan approval procedure should then be opened in the summer of 2019, but the documents were not ready until early 2020 to apply for the initiation of the plan approval procedure to the government of Lower Bavaria. Another information event took place on January 30, 2020, because since the event in December 2018, the nature conservation documents in particular had been revised and specified. On January 21, 2020 the city of Landshut and the communities of Essenbach and Niederaichbach were sent the planning approval documents. On May 29, the objection period against the first 1.8 km long construction section, starting from the motorway junction with the A 92 crossing the Isar to LAs 14, ended. A total of 1,244 objections were raised. After inspection by the government of Lower Bavaria, the Landshut State Building Authority now has the opportunity to comment. Subsequently, the government of Lower Bavaria examines and evaluates the objections and the statements of the developer.

The noise protection between the tunnel (so-called cover on the groundwater tank) and the bridge over the Isar was already in dispute between the Landshut State Building Authority and the Essenbach market in the run-up to the proceedings.

Dialogue forum

As part of the route registration for the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan, the start of a public forum for the development of specific route proposals by the State Building Authority with the involvement of the affected communities was announced for April 2015. It was set up on April 7, 2015 as a so-called East-South Landshut bypass dialogue forum as part of the B15neu . It should last for two years. It has had its own website since August 20, 2015.

goals and tasks

The aim of the forum is to enable the extension of the section of the B 15n from the A 92. The forum has the following tasks:

• Discussion about project-relevant aspects
• Accompanying the planning,
• Informing the public.

Regarding the tasks of a public forum to be set up, District Administrator Peter Dreier said at the beginning of February 2015: “The State Building Authority will work out all possible variants, even one including a western bypass.” These should then be discussed with the communities concerned. Thomas Huber, Mayor of Kumhausen, spoke in April 2015 at the citizens' meeting in Kumhausen of 30 different variants that should be examined.

Since municipal and state projects come together at Landshut, the planning variants to be examined are to be examined both with regard to the perspective of further traffic development in the eastern Bavarian region and simplification of north-south traffic, as well as an improvement in Landshut's traffic situation. At the end, recommendations for action should be formulated as a result of the dialogue forum.

In the context of project-related public relations work, one of the main goals is to “counteract one-sided reporting against the project”. It also has its own website for this purpose.

Attendees

It is managed by:

• Landshut's Lord Mayor Hans Rampf (until December 31, 2016) replaced by Alexander Putz (since January 1, 2017)
• District Administrator Peter Dreier and
• initially Karl Wiebel, head of the Bavarian Road Administration. later then Wolfgang Wüst, honorary professor at the Faculty for Building Geo Environment at the Technical University of Munich

Markus Michalka was entrusted with the moderation. Also represented are:

the deputies of the region the mayors of the affected communities the IHK Niederbayern the Bavarian Farmers' Association Landshut

the Bund Naturschutz the citizens' initiative "Stop B15neu" the citizens' initiative “Pro B15neu”.

1. ↑ Initially, Alexander Putz was the representative newly appointed by Pro B15; Since January 1st, 2017 he has been Lord Mayor of Landshut.

The following MPs were invited:

• CSU - Florian Oßner , Erwin Huber , Helmut Radlmeier , Florian Hölzl
• Greens - Thomas Gambke (until the 2017 federal election) replaced by Erhard Grundl (since the 2017 federal election), Rosi Steinberger
• Free voters - Hubert Aiwanger , Jutta Widmann
• SPD - Ruth Müller , Rita Hagl-Kehl ,
• FDP (since the 2017 federal election ) - Nicole Bauer and
• AfD (since the 2017 federal election) - Stephan Protschka .

Employees from the Southern Bavaria Autobahn Directorate, the Landshut State Building Authority and the building administrations of the city and district of Landshut form a supporting project group. Their task is:

• Coordination of planning and investigation work,
• Conducting the planning dialogue with the communities and those affected and
• Preparation of the recommendations of the dialogue forum.

Manfred Dreier from the Landshut State Building Authority was the spokesperson for the project group until the beginning of 2019. After moving to the State Ministry for Housing, Building and Transport as head of department, Robert Bayerstorfer, his successor in the state construction worker, took over this position.

Participants from cities and municipalities

Local authority	Representative
Landshut district	District Administrator Peter Dreier
City of Landshut	Mayor Alexander Putz
Adlkofen	Mayor Rosa-Maria Maurer
Altdorf	Mayor Helmut Maier
Altfraunhofen	Mayor Katharina Rottenwallner
Eching	Mayor Andreas Held
Ergolding	Mayor Andreas Strauss

Participants from cities and municipalities

Local authority	Representative
Essenbach	Mayor Dieter Neubauer
Geisenhausen	Mayor Josef Reff
Kumhausen	Mayor Thomas Huber
Tiefenbach	Mayor Birgit Gatz
Vilsbiburg	Mayor Helmut Haider
Vilsheim	Mayor Georg Spornraft-Penker

Positions of the participants

Some of the participants in the dialogue forum entered the dialogue forum with similar and sometimes completely opposite positions.

Positions of the participating persons and organizations

Attendees	position
BUND nature conservation district group Landshut	The district group of the environmental and nature conservation organization is in favor of renouncing the construction of the B 15new and for a near-city and inner-city solution for source and destination traffic.
Adlkofen municipality	There is a municipal council resolution of September 21, 2009 against further construction of the B 15 new. On June 17, 2015, another resolution was passed in which the current planning was rejected and a local bypass of Landshut was required. As a reaction to the result of the regional planning assessment in the course of the regional planning procedure, another resolution was passed by the municipality on March 19, 2018 in which route 1c was rejected. In the event of a corresponding planning on the basis of route 1c, the mayor made it clear that “the municipality wants to exhaust all possible steps to take action against such a realization”.
Kumhausen community	The mayor said on January 8, 2015 as follows: "An alternative route for the B15 motorway, as presented, is unacceptable for me!" In January, the local council unanimously passed a resolution against a new western route for the B15. The municipal council has spoken out against route 1a or 1b and in favor of route 1c.
IHK Niederbayern	It is new for a continuous implementation of the B 15 from Regensburg to Rosenheim.
Essenbach market	In 2012, a municipal council resolution refused to continue the B 15 beyond the A 92 through the village of Ohu. This was confirmed in January 2015. An offset solution without a motorway junction is advocated, which would allow a continuation past Ohu. At the end of March 2017, the municipal council passed a resolution demanding: “If the continuation of the B 15new should actually be implemented in the three proposed variants, the Essenbach municipal council only considers the extension with housing and cover to be acceptable. The additional costs of around six million euros are to be expected of the developer. "
Pro B 15 new	This organization is for a continuous realization of the B 15 new from Regensburg to Rosenheim.
State building authority Landshut	Represented by Manfred Dreier, a continuous realization of the B 15 new from Regensburg to Rosenheim (linked to an east-south bypass of Landshut) as an efficient north-south axis and to develop the eastern Bavarian area is advocated.
City of Landshut	At the end of January 2015, the city council passed a resolution in favor of the construction of an east-south bypass of Landshut as a continuation of the B 15n from the A 92 at least to the B 299 but if possible to the B 15. Also the mayor who has been in office since January 1, 2017 Alexander Putz supports this.
STOP B15 new	This amalgamation of citizens' initiatives is against the construction of a B 15new beyond the A 92, but in favor of a traffic-friendly solution with regard to the source and destination traffic in Landshut.
Geisenhausen market	April 2013 the local council of Geisenhausen overturned a four-year-old decision against the construction of a B 15 new in a narrow 11: 9 decision and now spoke in favor of it. With regard to variants 1a, b and c, there was no decision-making in the Geisenhausen municipal council until mid-January 2017. In a conversation between the mayors of Adlkofen, Geisenhausen and Altfraunhofen with District Administrator Dreier in March 2018, the mayor demanded that "the B 15 new must be expanded continuously to the B 388 with four lanes".
Tiefenbach community	The municipal council passed resolutions against the construction of a new B 15 (January 2015) and against the realization of the routes discussed in the dialogue forum in the west of Landshut through the municipality's territory (July 2015).
Vilsheim municipality	The municipal council passed a resolution on December 22, 2014 against the construction of a B 15 new.
Bavarian Farmers' Association (BBV) Landshut	He rejects a motorway-like extension of the B 15 to Rosenheim because of the high space consumption . A route design must be done in a way that is gentle on the area.
Altfraunhofen community	The municipal council rejects the route 1b favored at the 4th meeting of the dialogue forum and supports variant 1a. Option 1c is also rejected. During a conversation between the mayors of Adlkofen, Geisenhausen and Altfraunhofen with District Administrator Dreier in March 2018, the mayor made it clear that the community refused to build a completely new building parallel to the existing community road and state road 2054.
City of Vilsbiburg	A continuation of a four-lane B 15 new over the B 299 and the roundabout near Vilsbiburg onto the two-lane B 388 are viewed critically by the first and second mayors of the city of Vilsbiburg.

Meetings

The meetings are not public. This is intended to enable “an objective and protected atmosphere”. Initially, the second half of April 2015 was planned for the first conference date. It was finally set for June 22, 2015. The second date was agreed for October 5. The meetings are not public.

Meeting dates

date	status	subjects
June 22, 2015	not public	1. Dialogue forum: organizational matters, goals of the dialogue forum, information on BVWP 2015 registration, presentation of variants of a bypass around Landshut
5th October 2015	not public	2. Dialogue forum: Presentation of the results of the investigations on the 14 different route variants or combinations of different routes
October 29, 2015	not public	Information event with question and answer session for all elected representatives of the municipal bodies participating in the forum and for five representatives each of the participating interest groups, associations and initiatives as well as the media
4th May 2016	not public	3rd dialogue forum: Restriction of the route variants to be considered further to 1a, 1b and 1c
October 24, 2016	not public	4th Dialogue Forum: Consideration of environmental aspects of route variants 1a, 1b and 1c and forecasts of traffic loads accompanying construction
May 22, 2017	not public	5th dialogue forum Further procedure regarding the initiation of a plan approval procedure for construction section I starting at the motorway junction of the B 15 new on the A 92 with Isar crossing to LA 14.
February 9, 2018	not public	6. Dialogue forum: Presentation of the results of the regional planning process
probably before the end of 2018	not public	7. Dialogue forum: Recommendation of the dialogue forum on plan cases 1b and 1c

1st session

At the first meeting, the participants introduced seven basic variants of a bypass around Landshut, three of which (cases 1, 2 and 5) were presented in two sub-variants, which corresponds to a total of ten variants. Only case 1a thus corresponded to the placeholder line registered for the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan. Four of these ten variants were based on the east-south bypass Landshut, which was registered in the federal traffic route plan, two of which were combined with an east bypass . Two variants were based on an offset solution from the junction of the B 15 to the A 92 via an outer western bypass of Landshut, one of which was combined with an eastern bypass. Two other variants were presented as the urban west bypass with an extension to the B 15 old, one of which was also combined with an east bypass. The last two variants were based on an east bypass with different degrees of expansion of the adjoining roads.

These are now to be examined with regard to their impact on traffic, costs as well as effects on space and the environment and evaluated by the second meeting. A traffic report to be commissioned should determine the traffic effectiveness (capacity for through traffic and for source and destination traffic).

The proposal number 6 was already formulated on January 23, 2015 at the meeting of the mayors of the Landshut district with District Administrator Dreier and Landshut's Lord Mayor Rampf by Essenbach's Mayor Dieter Neubauer and supported by the former Mayor of Essenbach and current Deputy District Administrator Fritz Wittmann and Kumhausen's Mayor Thomas Huber. At that time, too, he called for the possibility of a western bypass to be examined. Proposals 3, 4, 5a and 5b contain different variants of western bypasses. The district group of the Federal Nature Conservation in Bavaria e. V. supports proposal number 7. In 2007, the federal government certified a relieving effect for Essenbach and an improvement of the traffic offsetting the traffic to the A 94 between Moosburg and Erding , as discussed years ago by Markt Essenbach Connection to Munich Airport (shorter travel times), but did not expect any improvement in the development of Eastern Bavaria.

• Route variants that were discussed at the first meeting of the dialogue forum
• 

  Route variant 1a

• 

  Route variant 1b

• 

  Route variant 2a

• 

  Route variant 2b

• 

  Route variant 3

• 

  Route variant 4

• 

  Route variant 5a

• 

  Route variant 5b

• 

  Route variant 6

• 

  Route variant 7

With regard to the traffic effect z. B. currently collected data on the traffic flow on the motorway and federal road sections, the route selection is determined by automatic license plate recognition. For this purpose, the traffic flows up to November 2015 are recorded with cameras on the following roads, among others: B 11, B 15, B 299 and A 92. Drones were also used to determine traffic flows.

2nd session

Evaluation matrix of the 14 route variants

No.	Relief for residents	Traffic benefits	Environmental concerns	Cost efficiency	costs	Costs per km	Total land use in ha	of which land use forest in ha
1a v1					€ 261 million	€ 15.0 million	106	22nd
1a v2					€ 231 million	€ 13.3 million	86	19.5
1b					€ 305 million	€ 12.4 million	135	20th
1c					€ 303 million	€ 13.2 million	127	25th
2a					€ 317 million	€ 16.1 million	125	23
2 B					€ 361 million	€ 13.5 million	146	21st
3					€ 500 million	€ 14.6 million	107	14th
4th					€ 556 million	€ 15.2 million	116	15th
5a					€ 124 million	€ 13.3 million	37	5
5b					€ 187 million	€ 14.5 million	46	6th
6th					€ 225 million	€ 23.0 million	18th	4th
7th					€ 237 million	€ 24.4 million	19th	2
8th					€ 384 million	€ 14.4 million	144	28
9					€ 63 million	€ 17.5 million	9	1

Following the first session, the number of variants to be examined was increased to 14. The results of the investigations were presented at the second meeting on October 5, 2015. More precise information on the degree of expansion (number of strips or number of tunnel tubes) was also given. The length of the proposals examined varied from 3.6 km to 36.4 km, the number of possible junctions between four and twelve, the number of necessary crossing structures between seven and 90. The length of the bridge structure for an east tangent varied depending on the context between 680 and 750 m. The proposal with the cheapest cost estimate was 63 million euros, the most expensive was given at 556 million euros. The 2.1 km long tunnel at Eisgrub previously included in the approved preliminary draft for the continuation of a B 15 from the A 92 to the B 299 to Geisenhausen has been replaced by two much shorter tunnels with a total length of 650 (255 m plus 395 m). For the assessment, the total land use and the use of forest area in particular were also considered. The range of values ​​includes nine or one hectare for the variant with the lowest and 146 or 28 hectares for the largest land use. The largest space requirement is assigned to the variants that were rated with the greatest transport benefit or the greatest relief for the residents.

It was agreed to hold an additional information event before a third session of the dialogue forum. There was no vote by the dialogue forum on the route variants at this meeting. The following variants were examined:

• Route variants, the evaluations of which were presented at the second meeting of the dialogue forum
• 

  Route variant 1a

• 

  Route variant 1b

• 

  Route variant 1c

• 

  Route variant 2a

• 

  Route variant 2b

• 

  Route variant 3

• 

  Route variant 4

• 

  Route variant 5a

• 

  Route variant 5b

• 

  Route variant 6

• 

  Route variant 7

• 

  Route variant 8

• 

  Route variant 9

• 1a in version 1: As an east-south bypass, this will be continued from the B 15 motorway junction with the A 92 at Ohu as a four-lane route initially in the extension of the groundwater trough from the tunneling under the A 92. The bridge will then be built over this Isar. In the further course it is led through two twin-tube tunnels at Eisgrub, in order to then connect to the B 299 at Vogen / Gammel. It continues on two lanes until it joins the B 15 near Hachelstuhl.
  This variant is registered for the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan.
• 1a in version 2: This has been added. In contrast to the previous variant, the route from the motorway intersection of the B 15 new with the A 92 continues in three lanes. The tunnel remains two-tube, as an additional escape tube is required in addition to a three-lane tube with oncoming traffic.
• 1b: From the motorway junction of the B 15 new with the A 92 to the B 299, this corresponds to variant 1a in version 1. From the connection to the B 299 at Vogen / Gammel it leads on a four-lane B 299 to just before Geisenhausen, where it at the Asbach / Kreuzfeld level is connected to the B 15 as a two-lane crossbar through the Vilstal at the level of Gundihausen
• 1c: This variant has been added. As an east-south bypass, this will be continued from the motorway intersection of the B 15 with the A 92 at Ohu as a four-lane route initially in the extension of the groundwater trough from the tunneling under the A 92. The bridge will then be built over this Isar. In the further course it is led through two twin-tube tunnels near Eisgrub and further between Wölflkofen and Adlkofen on the spatial planning road towards Geisenhausen, where it meets the B 299 at Asbach. From there it goes as a two-lined crossbar through the Vilstal before it connects to the B 15 at Gundihausen.
• 2a: This variant corresponds to 1a version 1 supplemented by a two-lane east bypass.
• 2b: This variant corresponds to 1b supplemented by a two-lane east bypass.
• 3: Here the B 15new is continued from the motorway junction with the A 92 at Ohu in an offset over the A 92. An additional Münchnerau junction must be set up south of the Landshut-West junction. From there it is led to the south as a three-lane west-east bypass. After building a bridge over the Isar, a tunnel through the Isarhangleite leads west past Tiefenbach. At the height of Hachstuhl, it crosses the B 15, continues through the Vilstal and connects to the B 299 at Asbach / Kreuzfeld near Geisenhausen, in order to continue to Geisenhausen via the spatial planning road of the B 15 new. To implement this offset solution, a 16.8 km long six-lane expansion of the A 92 is considered necessary because of the ascent on the A 92 near Altdorf. Depending on the direction of travel, this is 2.3 to 2.4 percent (for comparison: in the area of ​​the planned tunnel near Eisgrub, an increase in the terrain of around 4 percent has to be overcome).
• 4: This variant corresponds to 3 supplemented by a two-lane east bypass.
• 5a: Here the B 15new from the motorway junction with the A 92 at Ohu im Versatz continues over the A 92 and traffic from the Landshut-West junction is initially directed on the St 2045 towards Landshut. Before Landshut, it is directed south as a two-lane west bypass. After building a bridge over the flood basin and over the Isar, it goes east past Tiefenbach. At the height of Hachstuhl, it connects to the B 15, on which it continues south.
• 5b: This variant corresponds to 5a supplemented by a two-lane east bypass.
• 6: This variant no longer corresponds to the discussion status at the first meeting of the dialogue forum. In the press release of June 22nd, a two-lane eastern bypass with an extension to the B 299 at Vogen / Gammel was described. No tunnel was mentioned. A version has now been investigated in which the traffic is initially led via a two-lane east bypass. The Isar and State Road 2045 are crossed on bridges. Then it goes through a 1.12 km long tunnel that connects the route to the B 299 at Moniberg.
• 7: This is a two-lane east bypass linked to an expansion of the barracks junction and Niedermayerstraße. This expansion includes a 540 m long trough and a 960 m long tunnel.
• 8: This is a combination of variants 1a and 5a. From Hachelstuhl a western (connection to the A 92 at Landshut-West) and a south-eastern (connection to the A 92 via the motorway junction with the B 15 new) bypass of Landshut would be possible. This "ring closure variant" was proposed by ProB15neu.
• 9: This variant is a two-lane east bypass that connects the B 15 at Ergolding near Rottenburger Straße with the LAs 14 at the level of the Lurzenhof. For this purpose, a bridge over the Isar at the level of the sewage treatment plant or the biomass cogeneration plant in Landshut is necessary.

Parameters for cost efficiency

number	length	Large bridges	tunnel	Nodes	Crossing structures	total cost
1a v1	17.4 km	395 m (Isar crossing B 15 new)	255 m + 395 m Isarhangleite	5	41	€ 261 million
1a v2	17.4 km	395 m (Isar crossing B 15 new)	255 m + 395 m Isarhangleite	5	41	€ 231 million
1b	24.5 km	395 m (Isar crossing B 15 new)	255 m + 395 m Isarhangleite	7th	57	€ 305 million
1c	23.0 km	395 m (Isar crossing B 15 new)	255 m + 395 m Isarhangleite	5	47	€ 303 million
2a	19.7 km	395 m (Isar crossing 15 new) 680 m (Isar crossing Osttangente)	255 m + 395 m Isarhangleite	7th	46	€ 317 million
2 B	26.8 km	395 m (Isar crossing B 15neu) 680 m (Isar crossing Osttangente)	255 m + 395 m Isarhangleite	9	62	€ 361 million
3	34.2 km (of which 16.8 km A 92)	730 m (Isar crossing west bypass)	430 m slope slope Tiefenbach	10	85	€ 500 million
4th	36.4 km (of which 16.8 km A 92)	730 m (Isar crossing west bypass) 680 m (Isar crossing east bypass )	430 m slope slope Tiefenbach	12	90	€ 556 million
5a	9.3 km	275 m (crossing flood basin west tangent) 720 m (Isar crossing west tangent)		5	29	€ 124 million
5b	12.9 km	275 m (crossing flood basin west bypass) 720 m (Isar crossing west bypass) 680 m (Isar crossing east bypass)		9	36	€ 187 million
6th	9.8 km (of which 3.7 km A 92)	750 m (Isar crossing Osttangente) 100 m (St 2045)	1,120 m crossing the FFH area Isarhangleite	10	18th	€ 225 million
7th	9.7 km (of which 3.7 km A 92)	740 m (Isar crossing Osttangente)	960 m crossing FFH area Isarhangleite + 540 m (for a trough)	7th	15th	€ 237 million
8th	26.7 km	275 m (crossing of the flood basin west bypass) 720 m (crossing of the Isar by west bypass) 395 m (crossing of the Isar by B 15 new)	255 m + 395 m Isarhangleite	10	70	€ 384 million
9	3.6 km	680 m (Isar crossing Osttangente)		4th	7th	€ 63 million

In the variant plan of the dialogue forum, another section of the route is drawn in the colors of the east bypass, which is called Project B 15, Landshut -  A 92 (AS Landshut / Essenbach) with sub-project 1) B 15 St. 2074 - A 92 near Landshut (four-lane expansion) was registered for the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan. It is unclear to what extent this was included in the overall assessment and especially in the cost calculation. A registration for the 2015 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan, which concerns project B 299, A 92 - Landshut with sub-project 1) B 299 A 92 - St. 2045 near Landshut, relates to the four-lane expansion of the B 299.

Predicted relief of local traffic
in vehicles per 24 hours for the year 2030

number	Konrad-Adenauer-Strasse (B 299)	Veldener Strasse (B 15)	Luitpoldstrasse (B 15)
1a v1	−7,100	−4,300	−3,000
1a v2	−5,800	−4,100	−2,800
1b	−7,800	−2,400	−1,900
1c	−8,800	−2,400	−1,600
2a	−10,700	−4,300	−3,100
2 B	−11,400	−2,300	−2,000
3	−1,900	−4,700	−3.200
4th	−9,800	−4,800	−3.200
5a	−1,600	−6,800	+2,000
5b	−9,700	−6,900	+1,900
6th	−8,600	+500	+300
7th	−8,500	+400	+400
8th	−8,800	−9,200	−5,300
9	−8,500	0	+500

The result of the investigations represents a forecast . The reference year for the traffic analysis is the year 2030.

With regard to the relief effect for the residents, it is assumed that by 2030 the B 15 will be continuously passable up to the A 92 (this is expected until 2019), the A 94 between Munich and Markl will be continuously passable (with serial number 182 as the ongoing project BY 5 A 94 Pastetten Heldenstein registered as a four-lane new building for BVWP 2015), the north bypass Taufkirchen on the B 388 has been implemented (with serial number 481 as a new project BY 304 B 388 OU Taufkirchen / Vils registered as a two-lane new building for BVWP 2015) and the B 15 West bypass Rosenheim has been completed (currently under construction and with serial number 185 registered as an ongoing project BY 8 B 15 West bypass Rosenheim as a two-lane new building for BVWP 2015).

With regard to traffic benefits, the time savings between the B 15 new near Essenbach and the B 299 near Geisenhausen as well as the B 15 new near Essenbach and the B 15 near Münchsdorf (municipality of Vilsheim) were evaluated, which corresponds to distances of 21 to 25 km, a forecast for the working days Load on the Isar bridge placed in 2030 and the maximum traffic load of a Landshut bypass considered with an assumed B 15 new completed from the A 93 to the A 8 near Rosenheim, because the two route variants registered for the BVWP 2015 extend up to Haag i.OB in height the B 304, but a route to Rosenheim has not been registered.

Manfred Dreier, head of the Landshut state building authority, informed that variant 8 performed best in terms of traffic criteria. The presentation of the results of the investigation showed that different municipal and supraregional issues and thus different traffic interests are involved in the route evaluation as follows:

• Relief effect in the west of Landshut
• Relief effect in the east of Landshut
• better transport connections to the northern and southern half of the Landshut and district
• Relief effect or increase in capacity of the transport network with regard to long-range transit traffic.

The corresponding reports for the traffic forecast, the environmental assessment as well as the planning and construction work were outsourced. The expert for the traffic forecast has already prepared several new traffic reports for the city of Landshut with regard to the B 15.

Forecast traffic volume
in vehicles per 24 hours for the year 2030

number	B 15alt	B 15 new spatial planning corridor	Isar bridge B 15 new	Isar bridge east tangent	Isar bridge western bypass	Isarbrucke west tangent
1a v1	23,000	24,000	20,700	-	-	-
1a v2	20,000	21,000	17,500	-	-	-
1b	23,000	24,000	20,400	-	-	-
1c	24,000	25,000	21,400	-	-	-
2a	23,000	23,000	19,800	5,200	-	-
2 B	22,000	23,000	19,500	5,200	-	-
3	14,000	11,000	-	-	10,600	-
4th	14,000	11,000	-	10,700	10,400	-
5a	15,000	14,000	-	-	-	8,800
5b	15,000	16,000	-	10,800	-	8,700
6th	14,000	17,000	-	13,400	-	-
7th	13,000	16,000	-	12,500	-	-
8th	23,000	24,000	20,300	-	-	6,500
9	12,000	16,000	-	11,900	-	-

With regard to the traffic impact, the forecast figures for the year 2030 shown in the adjacent table have been published. In addition, with variant 3, it is assumed that the volume of traffic on the A 92 would increase to up to 66,000 thousand vehicles.

The traffic censuses 2000/2005/2010 in this area of ​​the A 92 showed the following values ​​for the average daily traffic volume:

• 32,287 vehicles / 32,364 vehicles / 32,733 vehicles
  counting point 73399016 near Niederaichbach
• 28,502 vehicles / 29,028 vehicles / 34,021 vehicle
  counting point 74399015 to AS Landshut / Essenbach
• 36,388 vehicles / 36,441 vehicles / 38,541 vehicles
  counting point 74389014 in front of AS Altdorf
• 33,715 vehicles / 32,502 vehicles / 36,406 vehicle
  counting point 74389013 in front of AS Landshut-West

The 2010 traffic census based on BAYSIS data showed an average daily traffic volume of between 18,194 and 26,448 vehicles in the area of ​​the junction of the B 15alt with the A 92 up to the counting point on the old Bergstrasse in Landshut - in this area the Luitpoldstrasse is located. North of Landshut in Neufahrn 6,980 vehicles and south of Landshut in Taufkirchen 6,577 vehicles were determined. For the B 299 there were values ​​between 13,705 and 24,283 vehicles in the area of ​​the Landshut-Nord and Landshut St 2045 Ost motorway exit, in which Konrad-Adenauer-Straße is located. To the northwest of Landshut in the area of ​​the A 93 motorway exit to the B 299, 5,988 vehicles were identified, and 9,043 vehicles to the south of Landshut near Vilsbiburg and 4,811 vehicles to the southeast near Bodenkirchen. Figures from the current 2015 traffic censuses are not published.

A west bypass close to the city (variant 5a / 5b) or an east bypass close to the city (e.g. variant 6 or 9) can only be implemented in municipal building loads, as these have no effect on supra-regional traffic. With variant 6, a 1.2 to 1.5 km long section with a tunnel (designed as a two-lane tube) from Schönbrunn to the B 299 in the amount of Moniberg results in costs of 162 million euros. With regard to the environmental impact, there is the well-known problem around the fauna-flora-habitat area "Former training site Landshut with Isarleite", which makes the tunnel at Eisgrub necessary, with variant 3 this concerns the FFH area along the Isar floodplain and variant 6 would have Interventions in the Schönbrunn area affecting the forest habitat types and sources there.

3rd session

At the third meeting of the dialogue forum on May 4, 2016, further consideration of route suggestions for the continuation of the B 15 beyond the A 92 was reduced to the three variants 1a, 1b and 1c. Variant 1a corresponds to the evaluation route from the registration for the BVWP 2030 (four-lane eastern bypass Landshut plus two-lane southern bypass Landshut). Variant 1b includes the course of the eastern bypass of Landshut as well as an alternative offset solution with connection to the B 15 (four-lane offset via the B 299 with a subsequent two-lane continuation to the B 15). The variant 1c largely follows the route as shown in the approved preliminary draft from 2012 for the Essenbach (A 92) to Geisenhausen (B 299) section. The connection to the B 299, which is planned on the west side of Geisenhausen (in the preliminary draft, it was east of it) and the additional two-lane continuation to the B 15 are different here.

• remaining three route variants for further investigation after the third session of the dialogue forum
• 

  Route variant 1a

• 

  Route variant 1b

• 

  Route variant 1c

Until the next meeting of the dialogue forum, these three routes are to be examined in more detail and, above all, the environmentally relevant aspects are to be examined in more detail. As members of the dialogue forum, BUND Nature Conservation and the citizens' initiative "Stop B 15neu" reject these three variants and refer to the Federal Environment Agency, which in its statement on the BVWP 2030 had proposed that the eastern bypass of Landshut be removed from the urgent need. They still favor an east bypass near the city.

4th session

At the fourth meeting on October 24, 2016, forecasts of traffic loads accompanying construction and an environmental study were presented. The latter was started in September for the purpose of surveys on fauna and flora and with regard to expected environmental damage. In the context of the environmental investigation, a preference was given for route variant 1b, as it "brings about the least adverse effects on the examined environmental protection assets and at the same time scores best when it comes to improving traffic conditions". She is viewed critically by Mayor Katharina Rottenwallner from the municipality of Altfraunhofen because of the fragmentation of parts of the municipality. The BUND and “Stop B15neu” do not see any relief for the city of Landshut in this variant.

Regardless of the route chosen, requirements are expected for the structural execution of the crossings of the Isarhangleite (FFH area) and the Isar valley. For example, a wide-span viaduct could be necessary for the ascent from the Isar valley instead of the previously planned road embankment. From the perspective of several participants, route 1b also requires a four-lane expansion of the B 299 to Geisenhausen and further upgrading to Vilsbiburg. A complete enclosure of the groundwater basin was also discussed in order to minimize the effects of the fragmentation of the Ohu and Ohu settlement. The aim was to submit all three variants to a regional planning procedure by the end of 2016 at the request of the Landshut State Building Authority to the government of Lower Bavaria. At the end of February 2017, no regional planning procedure had yet been opened.

Compared to the Landshut east-south bypass registered in the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030, the connection to the B 15 from Hachelstuhl (municipality of Kumhausen) would shift a few kilometers further south between Münchsdorf (municipality of Vilsheim) and Altfraunhofen on route 1b. The traffic would then initially continue in the direction of Geisenhausen and flow via the B 299 into the Landshut east bypass (at Berggrub), via which there would be a connection to the motorway junction on the A 92 with the new B 15 (at Essenbach). The route would thus shift away from Landshut in a southerly direction and the driving distance would increase by 41 percent or 7.1 kilometers. Route variants that contained either an east bypass to Landshut or a west bypass to Landshut are therefore no longer being considered.

5th session

The subject of the fifth session was the preparation of the initiation of a plan approval procedure for the first section of the continuation of the B 15 new from the motorway junction with the A 92 with crossing the Isar to LA 14. In order to gain time, it was requested to start planning before the completion of the Spatial planning procedure to begin so that the corresponding planning approval procedure for construction section I can be initiated in summer 2018 , because the design and location of this section are identical for all the routes introduced into the regional planning procedure. (See also the chapter " Execution planning ": The state building authority Landshut tendered engineering services for the planning of the traffic facilities (B16E7727001-01, November 2016), the creation of a landscape maintenance plan (B16E7727001-02, December 2016) as well as the Object and structural planning of the Isar bridge (B16E7727001-03, February 2017)). The route through the village of Ohu is seen as a major problem to be overcome for this section and the requirement for an enclosure is confirmed. The Federal Ministry of Transport is currently not planning to do this, as it was not part of the registration documents for the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030.

6th session

The sixth session was devoted to presenting the results of the regional planning procedure. A resolution regarding a recommendation on one of the two remaining plan cases 1b or 1c was not passed. This should be done at the next meeting in summer. Until then, the Landshut State Building Authority will evaluate the results of the regional planning assessment.

The following advantages were highlighted for both plan cases:

• Increase in capacity of the section of the B 299 between Landshut − Geisenhausen through a four-lane expansion (in case 1b),
• no traffic obstructions in this heavily used area of ​​the B 299 during the construction period of the eastern bypass (in case 1c).

1. ↑ A four-lane expansion of the B 299 in the Landshut − Geisenhausen area is not part of the currently valid Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 and is therefore not considered in the urgent or further requirements of the corresponding expansion law for road traffic.

criticism

Dialogue forum

Criticism was already loud with the establishment of the dialogue forum, when Landshut's mayor Hans Rampf made it clear: "If you don't participate, it's your own fault" and "However, if you say that the B 15 should end at the A 92, you'd better stay at home" . The Green State MP Rosi Steinberger criticized the fact that the dialogue forum should not talk about the "whether", but only about the "how" of a Landshut bypass, but fundamentally did not question a Landshut bypass. Manfred Dreier from the State Building Authority shared this assessment when he noted that “the whether has been clearly decided on a political level”, but “how it will be discussed in a dialogue forum”. The Green Bundestag member Gambke questioned an open-ended route search, as all the variants of the B 15n south of the A 92 planned by the Bavarian Road Administration have in common that they begin at the planned motorway junction at Ohu . This is reinforced by statements by Interior Minister Herrmann who said in an interview at the beginning of August 2015: "The connection of the B 15 coming from Regensburg to the A92 will be designed as a motorway junction, so that we can continue building immediately" and "the bypass of Landshut will [... ] now planned, including connection to the B 299 and the old B 15. The dialogue forum has been set up for this purpose and is now accompanying the planning process ”.

Project / planning

The suitability for registration for the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan was also questioned due to the lack of nationwide importance of the construction project. District Administrator Peter Dreier said at the beginning of February 2015: "The federal government is not interested in bypassing Landshut, but in a supraregional transport concept from the A 93 to the A 94 " and Interior Minister Herrmann designated an east for the establishment of the dialogue forum on April 7, 2015 -South bypass for Landshut as "extremely urgent" a continuation of the B 15 new but as "another question". Gambke criticizes the lack of transparency in the current planning processes, including cost estimates. In October 2016, the city and district of Landshut commented on the planned construction method with a "road layout in an open trough location and additional noise barriers": This would "divide the village [Ohu / Ohu settlement] for all time, urban development opportunities are no longer available" . In March 2017, the Essenbach store made it clear that it reserved all legal means “to prevent a solution without an enclosure and cover”. The Free Voters Landshut see the traffic situation in Landshut as "only insufficiently improved" by an east-south bypass and therefore support the construction of both an outer west and an east bypass Landshut Landshut. The mayor of Essenbach sees a route up the Isarhangleiten in the form of a ramp as critical, as no protection for Ohu from the expected noise emissions is possible here. In January 2017, the community of those affected and opponents of the B 15 new and the citizens' initiatives (Stop B 15 new) submitted a complaint to the EU Commission regarding the implementation of the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 with regard to public participation, the variant examination and the evaluation of the three projects submitted for the B 15 new . In February 2017, the member of the dialogue forum, Jutta Widmann, justified her rejection of variant 1a as follows: "The municipality of Kumhausen is disproportionately affected and its further development is limited." The municipality of Altfraunhofen, on the other hand, looks at variants 1b and 1c higher costs, especially a significantly lower traffic relief for the city of Landshut as a disadvantage. With regard to the planned western bypass to Landshut , he does not consider these bypasses far from the city to make sense.

The residents of Eisgrub criticize the fact that the variant of a long tunnel is not considered in the regional planning procedure. As a result, the route moves up to 70 m from the property and there is no longer any economic processing of the remaining agricultural areas and the further development of Frauenberg would be impaired. In addition, one sees considerable problems for traffic safety when climbing above ground; For this reason, the solution with a 2.1 km long tunnel with a moderate increase in 2009 for the preliminary design approval was introduced in the original plans of the South Bavaria Motorway Directorate. With comparable arguments, resistance was also formed in Frauenberg against a solution without a “long” tunnel; 438 signatures were collected here at short notice.

Environmental aspects

There was also criticism from the Federal Environment Agency (UBA), which suggested that the project of an eastern bypass to Landshut (B015-G070-BY-T01-BY) should be deleted from the urgent need for the first draft of the BVWP 2030 because of its high environmental impact and the large amount of space it consumed . Because of the noise pollution to be expected for the town of Ohu, the Essenbach municipal council demanded in a resolution at the end of March that the building should continue to be built with an enclosure including a cover. The residents of Eisgrub fear considerable noise pollution due to the crossing variants of the Isar slopes (A and B) introduced into the spatial planning procedure, as the route leads around 70 m past the property. They also expect increased noise pollution for Frauenberg, Sittlkofen or the properties in the Au. The land use, possible effects on the groundwater and the crossing at the narrowest point of the FFH area are also criticized, because the narrowest point has a decisive function for the connection effect of the biotopes. A consideration of the "biotopes and landscape elements outside the FFH backdrop" has not yet taken place. The Landshut State Building Authority assumes that traffic noise in the area of ​​the Isarhangleiten is classified as legally irrelevant in the area of ​​Ohu due to the distance of two kilometers from Ohu.

Remarks:

1. ↑ In principle, however, the construction of an east-south bypass Landshut is advocated.

Web links

• Website of the dialogue forum East-South bypass Landshut
• Autobahn Directorate Southern Bavaria: B 15 new current status / B 15 new Regensburg (A 93) - Landshut (A 92) - Rosenheim (A 8)
• Dialogue forum east-south bypass Landshut: video animations with overflight at a height of 100 m over the plan routes 1a, 1b and 1c of the regional planning procedure

Individual evidence

1. ↑ ^{a b} Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure: Announcement on the participation of the public as part of the preparation of the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 of March 8, 2016 . In: Federal Ministry of Justice and for Consumer Protection (Ed.): Bundesanzeiger . Bundesanzeiger Verlag, Cologne March 14, 2016 ( BAnz AT March 14, 2016 B4 [accessed March 15, 2016]).
2. ↑ Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure: Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 ( Memento from August 3, 2016 in the Internet Archive ). PDF. Online at www.bmvi.de, accessed on August 12, 2016.
3. ^ Draft of a sixth law to amend the trunk road expansion law . In: German Bundestag (ed.): Printed matter . No. 18/9523 . Bundesanzeiger Verlag GmbH, September 5, 2016, ISSN  0722-8333 ( bundestag.de [PDF; accessed September 24, 2016]).
4. ↑ Autobahn Directorate South Bavaria: Lecture by Ministerialdirigent Karl Wiebel, Head of the Road and Bridge Construction Department of the Supreme Building Authority, on 15n Regensburg - Landshut - Rosenheim . PDF. Online at abdsb.bayern.de. Retrieved December 22, 2014.
5. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: “Stop B15 new planning on A92”, December 9, 2014.
6. ↑ Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior for Building and Transport: Current planning status B 15 new . Online at stmi.bayern.de. Retrieved December 10, 2014.
7. ↑ Motorway Directorate South Bavaria: Interior and Transport Minister Joachim Herrmann invites you to a citizens' meeting in spring 2015: Talk about the needs-based expansion of the B15 . Online at abdsb.bayern.de. Retrieved December 22, 2014.
8. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Rundschau: District Administrator Dreier, Mayor Rampf & all affected mayors for the new B 15 new concept . January 23, 2015. Online at la-rundschau.de. Retrieved January 25, 2015.
9. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: B15 new: District Administrator gathers the communities together . Online at www.wochenblatt.de.
10. ^ Vilsbiburger Zeitung: B15 new: District Administrator summons mayor, December 24, 2014.
11. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: Strong signal from the mayors , January 24, 2015.
12. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Wochenblatt: East-South bypass: "Anything else would be the GAU", January 28, 2015.
13. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: CSU ready to compromise, January 14, 2015.
14. ↑ ^{a b c} Landshuter Zeitung: CSU says goodbye to “yellow motorway”, January 14, 2015.
15. ↑ Mittelbayerische: Seehofer gives the green light for B15 again . January 30, 2015. Online at www.mittelbayerische.de. Retrieved January 30, 2015.
16. ^ Süddeutsche Zeitung: Seehofer's U-turn after eleven days . Online at www.sueddeutsche.de. Retrieved January 30, 2015.
17. ↑ ^{a b c} Radio Trausnitz: Minister of the Interior Herrmann on the back and forth at the B15 new ( Memento from January 31, 2015 in the Internet Archive ). MP3. Online at www.radio-trausnitz.de.
18. ↑ Bayerischer Rundfunk: Seehofer has the route construction checked again ( memento from February 2, 2015 in the Internet Archive ). Online at www.br.de. Retrieved January 30, 2015.
19. ↑ Bavarian State Chancellery press release No. 31: Report from the cabinet meeting on February 3, 2015 . PDF. Online at www.bayern.de. Retrieved February 3, 2015.
20. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: B15 new: So it goes on now, February 11, 2015.
21. ↑ Landratsamt Landshut: "Great future opportunity for improving the traffic situation" . Press release of March 5, 2015. PDF. Online at www.ou-landshut.de. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
22. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Tunnel and "cover" required, May 9, 2017.
23. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Yes to "Deckel", tunnel and route combination, May 9, 2017.
24. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: “How to win the lottery”, May 9, 2017.
25. ↑ ^{a b c d e} Landshuter Wochenblatt: B15 new: So it goes on now, February 11, 2015.
26. ^ ^{A b} Autobahn Directorate South Bavaria: B 15neu Regensburg (A 93) - Landshut (A 92) - Rosenheim (A 8) . Online at www.abdsb.bayern.de. Retrieved April 8, 2015.
27. ↑ ^{a b c d e f} Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure: Environmental Report on the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan - Status: March 2016 ( Memento from March 25, 2016 in the Internet Archive ). PDF. Online at init.pro.contentstream.de, accessed on March 23, 2016.
28. ↑ PRINS: Other projects (road) that are not part of the BVWP 2030 . Online at www.bvwp-projekte.de, accessed on March 21, 2016.
29. ↑ ^{a b c d e f g} PRINS: B 15 O-OU Landshut (A 92 - B 299) or B 15 S-OU Landshut (B 299 - B 15) . Online at www.bvwp-projekte.de, accessed on March 21, 2016.
30. ^ Federal Ministry of Transport: Environmental report on the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan . (PDF) March 1, 2016, accessed May 3, 2016 . 
31. ↑ Federal Environment Agency: Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan does not pass its own environmental assessment. In: press release. April 25, 2016. Retrieved May 3, 2016 . 
32. ↑ ^{a b c} Federal Environment Agency: Appendix to press release no. 18/2016 of April 25, 2016 "Federal transport route plan does not pass its own environmental assessment". (PDF) (No longer available online.) April 25, 2016, archived from the original on May 3, 2016 ; Retrieved May 3, 2016 . 
33. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: Further improvements for Lower Bavaria in the federal transport route plan . Online at www.wochenblatt.de, accessed on July 21, 2016.
34. ↑ Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure: Report on the involvement of the authorities and the public in the BVWP 2030 . PDF. Online at www.bmvi.de, accessed on August 12, 2016.
35. ^ Kerstin Schwenn: New Federal Transport Route Plan . Preservation comes before expansion and new construction. In: FAZ.NET . July 15, 2016, accessed July 16, 2016 . 
36. ^ Cabinet adopts Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030. Press release 129/2016. (No longer available online.) Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure, archived from the original on August 3, 2016 ; Retrieved August 3, 2016 . 
37. ↑ Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Transport: Plans for the B 15 new . January 19, 2015. Online at www.stmi.bayern.de. Retrieved January 20, 2015.
38. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: CSU gives up "Platzhalterertrasse", January 20, 2015.
39. ↑ br.de: Plans for new B15 stopped ( memento from January 20, 2015 in the Internet Archive ), online at www.br.de, accessed on January 19, 2015.
40. ↑ ^{a b c} German contract service: invitation to tender - technical planning services for traffic systems in Landshut (ID: 12479006) . Online at www.dtad.de, accessed on December 16, 2016.
41. ↑ ^{a b c} Autobahn Directorate South Bavaria: 15n Regensburg-Landshut-Rosenheim . Lecture by President Lichtenwald at the Landshut Regional Planning Association on March 21, 2012. PDF. Online at: region.landshut.org. Retrieved July 11, 2014.
42. ↑ ^{a b} Radio Trausnitz: Niederbayern: Details on the B15neu ( Memento from January 30, 2015 in the Internet Archive ). Online at www.radio-trausnitz.de. Retrieved January 30, 2015.
43. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: The Wende der Wende, January 31, 2015.
44. ^ ^{A b} Süddeutsche Zeitung: Dialog forum on the B 15 new . April 7, 2015. Online at www.sueddeutsche.de. Retrieved April 8, 2015.
45. ↑ Bavarian State Ministry for Regional Development and Environmental Issues: Former Auloh training site - a project to implement the Bavarian species and biotope protection program and BayernNetzNatur in the city of Landshut. ( Memento of the original from January 6, 2016 in the Internet Archive ) Info: The archive link was inserted automatically and has not yet been checked. Please check the original and archive link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. 2003. PDF. Online at: landshut.de. Retrieved January 6, 2016. 
46. ^ Building geological office Bauer GmbH: Eisgrub tunnel . Online at www.baugeologie.de. Retrieved October 9, 2015.
47. ↑ SSF Group: Engineering Geological Competence in Tunneling ( Memento from February 4, 2016 in the Internet Archive ). PDF. Online at www.ssf-ing.de. Retrieved October 9, 2015.
48. ^ Technical University of Dresden: Design principles for motorways ( Memento from November 22, 2015 in the Internet Archive ). Page 15. PDF. Online at tu-dresden.de. Retrieved October 1, 2015.
49. ↑ PRINS: General plan - B015-G070-BY-T01-BY . PDF. Online at www.bvwp-projekte.de, accessed on March 21, 2016.
50. ↑ PRINS: General plan - B015-G070-BY-T02-BY . PDF. Online at www.bvwp-projekte.de, accessed on March 21, 2016.
51. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: B15neu: This is how the favored variant 1b works , December 3, 2016.
52. ↑ ^{a b c d e f} Staatliches Bauamt Landshut: Spatial planning procedure B 15 new, A 92 - B 15 / East-South bypass Landshut - Explanatory report , December 16, 2016, PDF, online at www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on March 13, 2017.
53. ↑ rosenheim24.de: B15neu: Rosenheim district remains outside . Online at www.rosenheim24.de. Retrieved February 1, 2015.
54. ↑ ^{a b c d e} Landshuter Zeitung: “The B 15 new would be a step forward for Eastern Bavaria”, May 9, 2015.
55. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: Gambke remains with immediate construction stop , October 2, 2015.
56. ^ ^{A b} German Bundestag: Answer of the Federal Government . Printed matter 16/6722 of October 16, 2007. PDF. Online at dipbt.bundestag.de. Retrieved October 3, 2015.
57. ↑ BBI Bauer berantende Ingenieure: B15 new: November 17th Approval by Neufahrn .PDF. Online at www.bbi-ingenieure.de. Retrieved October 12, 2015.
58. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Dreier wants to talk Dobrindt into conscience, August 17, 2016.
59. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Wochenblatt: New construction of the B 15: Ohu threatens to split in two , November 2, 2016.
60. ↑ ^{a b} Vilsbiburger Zeitung: "Citizens have the right to maximum noise protection" , November 4, 2016.
61. ↑ ^{a b c d} Landshuter Zeitung: B 15 new: Three variants in the spatial planning procedure , October 25, 2016.
62. ↑ German Bundestag Printed Matter 18/10358 . PDF, November 18, 2016, online at dip21.bundestag.de, accessed on November 28, 2016.
63. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Oßner: The residents' concerns are justified , March 15, 2017.
64. ↑ Dialog forum east-south bypass Landshut: B 15 new: spatial planning procedure for the three east variants / Fourth meeting of the dialogue forum on the east-south bypass Landshut (note: 10% of 80 million euros) , press release of October 24, 2016, PDF, online at www.ou-landshut.de, accessed on March 18, 2017.
65. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: B 15-new: Dobrindt for tunnel near Ohe , September 22, 2017
66. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Dobrindt: "Advantages outweigh the additional costs" , September 22, 2017.
67. ↑ German Bundestag response of the federal government to the minor question from MPs Stephan Kühn (Dresden), Sven-Christian Kindler, Annalena Baerbock, other MPs and the Alliance 90 / DIE GRÜNEN parliamentary group - printed matter 18/13197 - financing of the road needs plan in the 2017 budget year . PDF. Printed matter 18/13328, August 16, 2017, accessed on July 15, 2018.
68. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: Relief for the local roads, August 2, 2014.
69. ↑ ^{a b} Supreme Building Authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Transport: Characteristic values ​​and maps . Online at www.baysis.bayern.de. Retrieved April 22, 2015.
70. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Wochenblatt: "It is really a miracle that Landshut plays in this league" , September 2, 2015.
71. ^ Deutsche Umschlaggesellschaft Schiene-Straße (DUSS) mbH: DUSS Terminal Landshut . PDF. Online at www1.deutschebahn.com. Retrieved October 4, 2015.
72. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: 300 BMW trucks a day: This is how Ergolding wants to avoid chaos , February 1, 2017.
73. ^ City of Landshut: Inbound and outbound commuters on June 30th . Online at www.landshut.de. Retrieved June 4, 2015.
74. ↑ Bavarian State Office for Statistics: 13111-104z / Employees subject to social insurance: District, commuters across district boundaries, proportion, gender, reference dates . Online at www.statistikbayern.de. Retrieved May 23, 2015.
75. ↑ ^{a b c} Dialog forum East-South bypass Landshut: Minutes of the 4th meeting on October 24, 2016 in Landshut ( memento from March 17, 2017 in the Internet Archive ), October 24, 2016, online at stop-b15-neu.de, accessed on March 17, 2017.
76. ↑ Supreme building authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for construction and traffic: characteristics and maps . Online at www.baysis.bayern.de. Retrieved May 2, 2015.
77. ^ City of Landshut: Population figures . Online at www.landshut.de, accessed on March 15, 2016.
78. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: District cracks the 150,000 mark, September 24, 2014.
79. ↑ City of Landshut: Annual Statistical Reports 2003 to 2013 . Online at www.landshut.de, accessed on March 15, 2016.
80. ↑ City of Landshut: LSA43 - Podewilsstr./Schlachthofstr./Äußere Regensburger-Str. on April 19, 2012 (Thursday); Total vehicles: 35,938 . JPG. Online at www.landshut.de, accessed on March 15, 2016.
81. ↑ ^{a b} Supreme Building Authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Transport: data query (road traffic counts) . Online at www.baysis.bayern.de. Retrieved April 22, 2015.
82. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: B 15 new to Auloh - and what the consequences would be, January 22, 2014.
83. ↑ Supreme building authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for construction and traffic: data retrieval (road traffic counts) A 92 . Online at www.baysis.bayern.de, accessed on October 21, 2017.
84. ↑ ^{a b} Supreme Building Authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Transport: data retrieval (road traffic counts) B 15 . Online at www.baysis.bayern.de, accessed on October 21, 2017.
85. ↑ Supreme building authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for construction and traffic: data retrieval (road traffic counts) B 11 . Online at www.baysis.bayern.de, accessed on October 21, 2017.
86. ↑ Supreme building authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for construction and traffic: data retrieval (road traffic counts) B 299 . Online at www.baysis.bayern.de, accessed on October 21, 2017.
87. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: Oops, where is the feared mega-traffic jam now? April 15, 2015.
88. ^ State building authority Landshut: Osttangente Landshut . PDF. Online at www.ergolding.de. Retrieved January 7, 2014.
89. ^ Bavarian State Parliament: Inquiries on the plenary session of December 1, 2014 / Answer from the Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Transport , December 4, 2014. Printed matter 17/4683. PDF. Online at www.bayern.landtag.de. Retrieved April 25, 2015.
90. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Landshut with and without western bypass - figures from the Kurzak report , September 22, 2017.
91. ↑ Parking List: Car park Grieserwiese - Landshut , online at www.parkinglist.de, accessed on September 23, 2017.
92. ↑ Parking List: Parkhaus Karstadt - Landshut , online at www.parkinglist.de, accessed on September 23, 2017.
93. ↑ Parkhaus Wittstraße GmbH: Parking in the heart of Landshut - right in the center , online at www.parkhaus-wittstrasse.de, accessed on September 23, 2017.
94. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: The next step south, December 15, 2018.
95. ↑ Staatliches Bauamt Landshut: Information event B 15neu, Essenbach (A 92) - B 299 New construction of the Landshut east bypass, construction section I from Essenbach (A 92) to Dirnau (LAs 14) on December 13, 2018 , PDF, online at www.ou -landshut.de, accessed on December 22, 2018
96. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Huber attacks Herrmann, January 21, 2015.
97. ↑ rosenheim24.de: B15neu: Rosenheim district remains outside . Online at www.rosenheim24.de, accessed on February 1, 2015.
98. ↑ ^{a b c d} Dialog forum East-South bypass Landshut: objectives, organization and course of the dialogue forum . PDF. Online at www.ou-landshut.de, accessed on August 24, 2015.
99. ↑ Autobahn Directorate South Bavaria: B 15neu Regensburg (A 93) - Landshut (A 92) - Rosenheim (A 8) . Online at www.abdsb.bayern.de. Retrieved April 11, 2015.
100. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: Will the new interchange at Ohu be finished a year later? , May 31, 2017.
101. ↑ Vilsbiburger Zeitung: Political posse about the B15 new, January 31, 2015.
102. ↑ Landshut aktuell: B15 new: Dialogue instead of constant dispute, April 8, 2015.
103. ↑ ^{a b c} Landshuter Wochenblatt: The bypass is urgent, but the rest has "a lot of time", April 8, 2015.
104. ↑ ^{a b} Good morning Landshut: Interior Minister Herrmann starts “Dialog Forum”: East-South bypass around Landshut “extremely urgent” - further construction of the B15 new “another question” ( memento from July 17, 2015 in the Internet Archive ). Online at www.gumola.de, accessed on April 15, 2015.
105. ↑ Münchner Merkur: 336 new streets and a "monster route" planned . July 23, 2015. Online at www.merkur.de. Retrieved September 20, 2015.
106. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Rundschau: One should be a prophet! Then you would have to be a prophet! Then we would know when the B 15 is new, or we too, when the B 15 is new, or not ...? . December 28, 2014. Online at www.la-rundschau.de, accessed on September 20, 2015.
107. ↑ ^{a b c} Landshuter Wochenblatt: Road Construction Office sniffed: Gambke criticism was not fair! , September 23, 2015.
108. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Concern about increasing traffic, July 16, 2016.
109. ↑ ^{a b c} Staatliches Bauamt Landshut: B 15 new: Extensive survey of the flora and fauna in the three favored corridors . PDF. Press release of September 9, 2016, online at www.ou-landshut.de, accessed on September 15 & September 2016.
110. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Bundestag clears the way for B15neu, December 3, 2016.
111. ↑ ^{a b c} Vilsbiburger Zeitung: Many critical voices about the bypass , January 20, 2017.
112. ↑ Bavarian Chamber of Engineers-Bau with the Supreme Building Authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior: Submission documents for the road bridge ideas competition - design based on holistic criteria ( Memento from December 29, 2016 in the Internet Archive ), January 31, 2011, PDF, online at www.bayika. de, accessed on August 13, 2017.
113. ↑ Bavarian Chamber of Engineers-Bau: ideas competition: Design of a road bridge according to holistic evaluation criteria - Bridge construction and environmental protection: Bavarian Chamber of Engineers-Bau awards holistic bridge design ( Memento from August 14, 2017 in the Internet Archive )
114. ↑ Deutsches Vergabeportal GmbH: Announcements for "Technical planning services for traffic facilities", www.dtvp.de, accessed on December 13, 2016.
115. ↑ TED Tenders Electronic Daily: Servicios - 408299-2016 - Alemania-Landshut: Servicios de diseño técnico de instalaciones de tráfico . Online at ted.europa.eu, accessed December 17, 2016.
116. ↑ wa - competitions current: Germany-Landshut: B 15 new east-south bypass Landshut object planning traffic facilities BA I and II. Reference number of the announcement: B16E7727001-01  ( page no longer available , search in web archives )  Info: The link was automatically defective marked. Please check the link according to the instructions and then remove this notice. . Online at www.wettbewerbe-aktuell.de, accessed on December 13, 2016.  
117. ↑ Tenders in Germany: B 15 new east-south bypass Landshut Object planning traffic facilities BA I and II. Reference number of the announcement: B16E7727001-01 - Announcement of awarded contracts Results of the award procedure for services , online at ausschreiben-deutschland.de, accessed on August 12, 2017.
118. ↑ Ausschreibungen-Deutschland.de: B 15neu east-south bypass Landshut landscape conservation plan BA I and II Notice reference. B16E7727001-02 , online ausschreibungen-deutschland.de, accessed on 14 March 2017.
119. ↑ Competitionline: B 15 new east-south bypass Landshut landscape conservation accompanying plan BA I and II - negotiation process , online at www.competitionline.com, accessed on August 12, 2017.
120. ↑ Ausschreibungen-Deutschland.de: B 15neu East-South Bypass Landshut: Structure K 49/1 Isarbrücke, Objektplanung engineering structures and structural design. Reference number of the notice: B16E7727001-03 and B 15 new east-south bypass Landshut: structure K 49/1 Isar bridge, project planning engineering structures and structural planning. Notice reference number: B16E7727001-03 - Correction , online at ausschreiben-deutschland.de, accessed on March 14, 2017.
121. ↑ vergabe.bayern.de: Announcement - B16E7727001-03 , formerly online at www.vergabe.bayern.de, accessed on March 14, 2017.
122. ↑ Competitionline: B 15 new east-south bypass Landshut: structure K 49/1 Isar bridge, project planning engineering structures and structural planning - negotiation procedure , online at www.competitionline.com, accessed on August 12, 2017.
123. ^ Association of Road Construction and Transport Engineers in Bavaria V .: VSVIsion 2015 , season publication 2015 , PDF, online at www.vsvi-bayern.de, accessed on March 18, 2017.
124. ↑ ^{a b} FOCUS Online: B15 new : The first section over the Isar should be planned quickly , 23 May 2017, online at www.focus.de, accessed on 16 June 2017.
125. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: "Lid is unavoidable" , August 2, 2017.
126. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Cover for B15 new important topic , March 11, 2017.
127. ↑ Staatliches Bauamt Landshut: Spatial planning procedure B 15 new, A 92 - B 15 / East-South bypass Landshut - Explanatory report , December 16, 2016, PDF, online at www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on March 13, 2017.
128. ↑ ^{a b c d e f} Landshuter Zeitung: The Isar is to be crossed soon , 23 May 2017.
129. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Gap in noise protection triggers trouble, March 15, 2019.
130. ↑ auschreiben-deutschland.de: B 15 new east-south bypass Landshut: structure K 48/1 groundwater trough with bridge St 2074, project planning engineering structures and structural planning. Notice reference number: B16E7727001-04 , online at auschreiben-deutschland.de, accessed on August 13, 2017.
131. ↑ Ted - tenders electronic daily: Deutschland-Landshut: Dienstleistungen von Ingenieurbüros, 2017 / S 242-503775, announcement of awarded contracts, results of the award procedure, services , online at ted.europa.eu, accessed on January 20, 2018.
132. ^ Regional Planning Association Landshut: Minutes of the 123rd meeting of the planning committee on March 21, 2012 in Reisbach, district of Dingolfing-Landau . PDF. Online at region.landshut.de. Retrieved August 3, 2014.
133. ^ Government of Lower Bavaria: Approval procedure for B 15 new at Vilsbiburg is to be rolled out again - planning approval decision for the Geisenhausen-Haarbach section canceled. Online at: regierung.niederbayern.de. Retrieved September 15, 2015.
134. ↑ Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure: Manual for good citizen participation ( Memento from October 15, 2014 in the Internet Archive ). Page 16. PDF. Online at www.bmvi.de. Retrieved September 16, 2015.
135. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: "More traffic: also expand the B299 to Vilsbiburg quickly", 7 December 2016.
136. ^ Government of Lower Bavaria: Spatial planning procedure for the B 15 new, East-South bypass Landshut , online at www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on March 11, 2017.
137. ↑ Staatliches Bauamt Landshut: Site and elevation plan variant A and visualization variant A , PDF, online at www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on March 14, 2017.
138. ↑ State Building Authority Landshut: Location and elevation plan variant B and visualization variant B , PDF, online at www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on March 14, 2017.
139. ↑ Staatliches Bauamt Landshut: Street cross section RQ 21 , PDF, online at www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on March 14, 2017.
140. ↑ Staatliches Bauamt Landshut: Street cross section RQ 11.5 , PDF, online at www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on March 14, 2017.
141. ↑ State Building Authority Landshut: Environmental Compatibility Study, December 16, 2016, PDF, online at www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on March 14, 2017.
142. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: 1000 euros for environmental reports, May 9, 2017.
143. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Almost 500 statements in progress , December 6, 2017.
144. ↑ Government of Lower Bavaria: Regional planning procedure B 15 new, East-South bypass Landshut, completed , press release 61/2018 of February 8, 2018, online at www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on February 8, 2018.
145. ↑ ^{a b c} Government of Lower Bavaria - Higher State Planning Authority: State planning assessment for the B 15 new east-south bypass Landshut from February 8, 2018, Az. 24-8254-96 . PDF, online at www.regierung-niederbayern.de, accessed on February 9, 2018.
146. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Major optimization of the traffic situation , May 30, 2017.
147. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: One-two is a direct hit for the region, April 28, 2018.
148. ↑ Staatliches Bauamt Landshut: B 15neu, Landshut east bypass: information event on the first construction phase of the Landshut east bypass , press release 54/2018 of November 22, 2018, PDF, accessed on November 22, 2018.
149. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Information on the B 15 new, January 16, 2020.
150. ^ Government of Lower Bavaria: B 15 new, Regensburg - Landshut - Rosenheim , online at regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de, accessed on January 23, 2020.
151. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: 1.8 kilometers of road - 1244 statements, June 30, 2020.
152. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: From April back to operation on the problem construction site, January 22, 2020.
153. ↑ ^{a b} Bayerischer Rundfunk: Federal Ministry of Transport throws away signatures ( memento from June 24, 2015 in the Internet Archive ). Online at www.br.de. Retrieved April 9, 2015.
154. ↑ Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Transport: Bavaria's Minister of the Interior, Joachim Herrmann, together with Landshut's Lord Mayor Hans Rampf and District Administrator Peter Dreier, will provide information about the establishment of a "Dialog Forum East-South Landshut Bypass in the course of the B 15neu" . Press release of March 31, 2015. PDF. Online at www.ou-landshut.de. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
155. ↑ ^{a b c} Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: A dialogue forum seeks the solution, April 7, 2015.
156. ^ Dialogue forum East-South bypass Landshut: East-South bypass Landshut . Online at www.ou-landshut.de. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
157. ↑ ^{a b} Joachim Herrmann, member of the state parliament: Dialogue forum for the expansion of the B15 new . Online at www.joachimherrmann.de. Retrieved April 9, 2015.
158. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Community is looking forward to Dialog-Forum, April 16, 2015.
159. ↑ ^{a b c} regio-aktuell 24: Dialog forum on the east-south bypass Landshut successfully started . June 22, 2015. Online at www.regio-aktuell24.de. Retrieved June 23, 2015.
160. ↑ Landshut Rundschau: The dialogue forum for east-south bypass of Landshut today successfully launched: . June 22, 2015. Online at www.rundschau24.de. Retrieved June 28, 2015.
161. ↑ ^{a b} Bavarian State Building Administration for Building Construction, Urban Development, Housing Construction, Transport, Road and Bridge Construction: B 15neu - Landshut East-South Bypass - Planning in Dialogue with the Region , PDF, online at www.stmi.bayern.de, accessed on 1st May 2018.
162. ↑ ^{a b c} Dialog forum East-South bypass Landshut: Via the Dialog Forum , online at www.ou-landshut.de, accessed on June 20, 2019.
163. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Dialog Forum: No pre-determination on B15 new, June 24, 2015.
164. ↑ ^{a b c d e} Landshuter Zeitung: Dialogue forum: Who can participate? , June 22, 2015.
165. ↑ ^{a b c} Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: Project opponents ready for dialogue forum, April 29, 2015.
166. ↑ Pro B15 new : B15 new dialogue forum . Online at www.pro-b15neu.de. Retrieved June 13, 2015
167. ↑ PRO B15neu initiative: Dialogue forum: PRO B15neu welcomes the objectives of the state government and administration , June 23, 2015, online at www.pro-b15neu.de, accessed on February 25, 2017.
168. ↑ ^{a b c} Dialog forum East-South bypass Landshut: About the Dialog Forum . Online at www.ou-landshut.de. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
169. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: "If you just want to shout stop, stay at home", April 8, 2015.
170. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Manfred Dreier changes to the State Ministry, March 1, 2019.
171. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: In agreement: Do not put off renovations, June 11, 2019.
172. ↑ BUND Nature Conservation / Landshut District Group: BUND Nature Conservation calls for another stop of the B 15 new on the A 92 near Landshut / Essenbach ( memento of July 14, 2014 in the Internet Archive ). February 18, 2015. Online at www.landshut.de. Retrieved May 1, 2015.
173. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: “Not that far apart” and yet divided, June 19, 2015.
174. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: Against Trasse 1c , March 24, 2018.
175. ^ Community of Kumhausen: Citizens' meeting of the community of Kumhausen on January 8, 2015 ( Memento of March 5, 2016 in the Internet Archive ). PDF. Online at www.kumhausen.de. Accessed May 1st. 2015.
176. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Local council against west route of the B15neu, January 15, 2015.
177. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Lighthouse project with precision landing , April 12, 2017.
178. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Transport network in Lower Bavaria should get better, April 30, 2015.
179. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: Resolution for B15 new . May 31, 2013. Online at wochenblatt.de. Retrieved August 26, 2014.
180. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung, Council confirms “No” to the B15 new construction, January 20, 2015.
181. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: Market Council passes resolution , April 4, 2017.
182. ↑ Pro B 15 new: Our positions . Online at www.pro-b15neu.de. Retrieved May 1, 2015.
183. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: B15neu: “Come what may, LA needs a bypass”, February 4, 2015.
184. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: "Mountain of debt weighs heavily on your shoulders" , February 25, 2017.
185. ^ Community of those affected and opponents of the Regensburg-Rosenheim autobahn route (B 15neu) e. V .: Press release The better solution for Landshut and the B15 new . PDF. Online at stop-b15-neu.de. Retrieved April 30, 2015.
186. ↑ Geisenhausen is now voting again for B15. April 26, 2013. Online at: rosenheim24.de. Retrieved July 8, 2014.
187. ↑ ^{a b} Landkreis Landshut: Compatible solution for implementation of B15 new , March 23, 2018, online at www.landkreis-landshut.de, accessed on March 24, 2018.
188. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Do not cut Tiefenbach and Ast, July 24, 2015.
189. ^ Municipality of Vilsheim: Local council resolution of the municipality of Vilsheim of December 22, 2014 . Online at www.vilsheim.de. Retrieved January 16, 2015.
190. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Preventing Burdens for the Community , March 1, 2017.
191. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: Towards a bypass distant from the city , March 11, 2017.
192. ↑ Landshut aktuell: Questions regarding traffic - City council is also discussing B15 new, March 21, 2018.
193. ↑ ^{a b} Bayerischer Rundfunk: Dialog Forum - Opponents satisfied with the start ( memento from June 24, 2015 in the Internet Archive ). June 22, 2015. Online at www.br.de. Retrieved June 22, 2015.
194. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Communities at the border, October 10, 2015
195. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Dialogforum bypass Landshut, October 19, 2015.
196. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: New Destiny Day for the B 15 , March 7, 2016.
197. ↑ ^{a b c} Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: Decision for recommendation postponed , February 10, 2018.
198. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: "Cooperation needs trust", September 13, 2018.
199. ↑ Bayerischer Rundfunk: Variants for a bypass around Landshut ( Memento from June 24, 2015 in the Internet Archive ). June 22, 2015. Online at www.br.de. Retrieved June 22, 2015.
200. ↑ Bund Naturschutz in Bayern e. V .: Dialogue procedure for the East-South bypass Landshut , Naturschutz Nachrichten, No. 52 / September 2015.
201. ^ SPD in Markt Essenbach: Effects of the B15 new for Ohu . Online at www.spd-essenbach.de. Retrieved October 3, 2015.
202. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: “No stop on the A92!”, August 1, 2015.
203. ↑ Landshuter Wochenblatt: Trees instead of cars: Who is sabotaging the B11 cameras? , September 16, 2015
204. ↑ ^{a b c} Dialog forum East-South bypass Landshut: Compilation of evaluation matrix and overview map, second meeting of the Dialog Forum, October 5, 2015
205. ↑ ^{a b c d} Landshuter Zeitung: B 15 new: Four-lane variants are in front , October 7, 2015.
206. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Wochenblatt: B 15 new: The best would be to close the ring on 7 October 2015.
207. ↑ ^{a b c d e} Landshuter Rundschau: Dialog forum B 15 new: 14 route variants Dialog forum B 15 new: 14 route variants presented and assessed, the costs also presented and assessed . October 7, 2015. Online at www.rundschau24.de. Retrieved October 10, 2015.
208. ↑ ^{a b c d e} Dialogue forum east-south bypass Landshut: comparison matrix . Second meeting of the dialogue forum on October 5, 2015. Online at stop-b15-neu.de. 19th October 2015
209. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Das Duell , October 15, 2017.
210. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: “Not to be understood” , September 22, 2015.
211. ↑ Supreme building authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for construction and traffic: data retrieval (road traffic counts) . Online at www.baysis.bayern.de. Retrieved October 10, 2015.
212. ^ Dialog forum East-South bypass Landshut: press release . May 4, 2016, online at www.ou-landshut.de, accessed on May 11, 2016.
213. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: B 15 new: Only routes further away from the city in the race , May 5, 2016.
214. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Project opponents continue for bypasses close to the city, May 5, 2016.
215. ↑ Vilsbiburger Zeitung: "If you just want to shout stop, stay at home", April 8, 2015.
216. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: "Dialog forum only alibi event", April 23, 2015.
217. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: “Do not support smugglers' business” - summer interview, August 11, 2015.
218. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: "Construction stop, immediately!", September 15, 2015.
219. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: Dreier addresses Dobrindt with an "insistent request" , April 12, 2017.
220. ↑ Vilsbiburger Zeitung: “Isar crossings necessary”, October 17, 2016.
221. ↑ Community of those affected and opponents of the B15 new and the citizens' initiatives (Stop B 15 new ): B15 new opponents submit a complaint to the EU . PDF, press release of January 12, 2017, online at stop-b15-neu.de, accessed on January 14, 2017.
222. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: B 15 new: Complaint was submitted on January 14, 2017.
223. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: West bypass not rejected , March 13, 2017.
224. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: What will happen to Eisgrub? , March 15, 2017.
225. ↑ ^{a b} Landshuter Zeitung: "Long tunnel is the only justifiable option" , March 15, 2017.
226. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: “We will work for a tunnel solution”, April 13, 2017.
227. ↑ Landshuter Zeitung: B15 new: Market Council passes resolution , April 4, 2017.