Arado Ar 232: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Variants: Fixed wording regarding Ar 432
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
|name= Ar 232
|name= Ar 232
|image= File:Arado Ar 232B-0 RAE.jpg
|image= File:Arado Ar 232B-0 RAE.jpg
|caption= Arado Ar 232 B-0
|caption= Arado Ar 232B-0
}}{{Infobox aircraft type
}}{{Infobox aircraft type
|type= Transport
|type= Transport
Line 21: Line 21:
|}
|}


The '''Arado Ar 232 ''Tausendfüßler''''' ([[German language|German]]: "Millipede"), sometimes also called ''[[Tatzelwurm]]'', was a [[cargo aircraft]], designed and built in small numbers by the German firm [[Arado Flugzeugwerke]] during [[World War II]]. The design introduced, or brought together, almost all of the features now considered to be standard in modern cargo transport aircraft designs, including a box-like [[fuselage]] slung beneath a [[Wing configuration|high wing]]; a rear loading ramp (that had first appeared on the December 1939-flown [[Junkers Ju 90#Military development|Junkers Ju 90]] V5 fifth prototype four-engined transport via its ''Trapoklappe''); a high-mounted [[twin tail]] for easy access to the hold; and various features for operating from rough fields. Although the ''[[Luftwaffe]]'' was interested in replacing or supplementing its fleet of outdated [[Junkers Ju 52|Junkers Ju 52/3m]] transports, it had an abundance of types in production at the time, and did not purchase large numbers of the Ar 232.
The '''Arado Ar 232 ''Tausendfüßler''''' ([[German language|German]]: "Millipede"), sometimes also called ''[[Tatzelwurm]]'', was a [[cargo aircraft]] that was designed and produced in small numbers by the German aircraft manufacturer [[Arado Flugzeugwerke]]. It was designed during the first half of the [[Second World War]] in response to a request by the ''[[Reich Air Ministry|Reichsluftfahrtministerium]]'' (German Air Ministry, RLM) for a successor or supplemental transport aircraft to the ''[[Luftwaffe]]'''s obsolescent [[Junkers Ju 52|Junkers Ju 52/3m]]. The Ar 232 introduced, or brought together, almost all of the features now considered to be standard in modern cargo transport aircraft designs, including a box-like [[fuselage]] slung beneath a [[Wing configuration|high wing]]; a rear loading ramp (that had first appeared on the December 1939-flown [[Junkers Ju 90#Military development|Junkers Ju 90]] V5 fifth prototype four-engined transport via its ''Trapoklappe''), a high-mounted [[twin tail]] for easy access to the hold and features for operating from rough fields. It was initially requested to be powered by a pair of [[BMW 801|BMW 801A/B]] [[radial engine]]s, however, an alternative arrangement of four [[BMW]] [[Bramo 323]] engines was adopted instead due to a lack of capacity.

The first twin-engine prototype performing its [[maiden flight]] in June 1941, while the first four-engine prototype followed roughly one year later. The type demonstrated clear performance advantages over the Ju 52/3m and limited pre-production orders were placed, leading to roughly 20 aircraft being constructed. The envisioned mass production of the Ar 232 was never attained, primarily due to Germany having an abundance of transport aircraft in production and thus it did not purchase large numbers of Ar 232s. Several aircraft did see operational use, to aid wartime production efforts and on the front line. Arado's design team continued to work on refinements, including economy measures and the enlarged six-engined Ar 632 variant. At one point, German officials expected quantity production of the type to be attained in October 1945 but the war ended instead. Two Ar 232s were captured by the British and operated for a time between England and Germany following the conflict.


==Development==
==Development==
What would become the Ar 232 originated from a [[tender offer]]ed by the [[Reichsluftfahrtministerium]] (RLM/German Aviation Ministry) issued during late 1939 which sought a replacement for the ubiquitous Ju 52/3m transport. Both Arado and [[Henschel & Son|Henschel]] were requested to design a rear-loading aircraft that was to be powered by a pair of 1,193&nbsp;kW (1,600&nbsp;hp) [[BMW 801|BMW 801A/B]] [[radial engine]]s,<ref>Chant 1999, p. 22.</ref> which was just entering prototype production and not currently used on any front-line designs. Arado's design team was headed by the aeronatical engineer Wilhelm van Nes. The basic configuration selected was that of a [[cantilever]] mid-wing smooth-skinned [[monocoque]] design with a spacious cargo area that was as low to the ground as feasibly possible. Furthermore, the aircraft was to be relatively robust and capable of operating from austere airstrips and rough terrain, possess [[STOL|short takeoff and landing]] (STOL) capabilities, and permit rapid loading and unloading times.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=122-123}}
Even before the prototypes were complete in 1941, the [[Focke-Wulf Fw 190]] project had been earmarked to use the BMW 801A/B, and was proving to be a capable design, with each BMW 801 radial weighing about 1,012&nbsp;kg (2,231&nbsp;lb). Production of the BMW 801 was insufficient to supply this new demand, and the Ar 232 was forced to use another engine. Eventually, the [[BMW]] [[Bramo 323]] ''Fafnir'' nine-cylinder radial, itself weighing some 550&nbsp;kg (1,210&nbsp;lbs), from Focke-Wulf's [[Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor|Fw 200]] land-based maritime patrol aircraft as an alternate powerplant choice was selected instead, as it was already in production and could meet requirements if the Ar 232 really did replace the Ju 52/3m in service. The prototypes were far enough along that switching engines would have seriously delayed the program, so the first two were to be completed as the '''Ar 232A''', and the third and a newly ordered fourth as the '''Ar 232B'''. The third and fourth prototypes (and all production aircraft) used four engines (in place of the two specified in the RLM specification) in order to provide the desired performance.

Following a review of the competing aircraft, Arado's design was selected over Henschel's, leading to the company receiving an initial order for three [[prototype]]s in 1940. However, challenges for the Ar 232 soon became apparent in the form of the [[Focke-Wulf Fw 190]] project, which had been also earmarked to use the same BMW 801A/B engine. However, production of the BMW 801 was deemed to be insufficient to fulfil all of the prospective demands, thus Arado was compelled to adopt an alternative engine for the Ar 232. Eventually, the [[BMW]] [[Bramo 323]] ''Fafnir'' nine-cylinder radial engine, weighing roughly 550&nbsp;kg (1,210&nbsp;lbs) each, from Focke-Wulf's [[Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor|Fw 200]] land-based [[maritime patrol aircraft]] was selected as the alternate powerplant instead. The Bramo 323 was already in production and could meet requirements if the Ar 232 really did replace the Ju 52/3m in service. The prototypes were far enough along that switching engines would have seriously delayed the program, thus the first two aircraft were to be completed as the '''Ar 232A''', while the third and a newly ordered fourth prototype were designated as the '''Ar 232B'''. The third and fourth prototypes (and all production aircraft) used four engines (in place of the two specified in the RLM specification) in order to provide the desired performance.


[[File:Arado Ar 232 A-0 Germany 1945.jpg|thumb|An Ar 232A-0 in 1945]]
[[File:Arado Ar 232 A-0 Germany 1945.jpg|thumb|An Ar 232A-0 in 1945]]
The first two prototypes, bearing the ''Stammkennzeichen'' alphabetic codes GH+GN and VD+YA respectively, started trials in early 1941. The first flight resulted in the collapse of the nose gear, but the twenty-two "millipede wheels" saved the aircraft from damage. A further ten pre-production machines were built, and were used operationally as the '''Ar 232A-0''' while awaiting production versions. In general, the Ar 232 completely outperformed the Ju 52/3m. It carried roughly double the load over longer distances, operated from shorter runways and rougher fields if need be, and cruised about 70&nbsp;km/h (44&nbsp;mph) faster.
The first two prototypes, bearing the ''Stammkennzeichen'' alphabetic codes GH+GN and VD+YB{{Sfn | Munson | 2002 | p = 22}} respectively, were completed in early 1941 and commenced trials as soon as possible. The first flight, while otherwise uneventful, suffered a partial [[landing gear]] failure during landing; while the nose gear collapsed, the twenty-two "millipede wheels" saved the aircraft from damage. The cause was determined to be a stuck [[oleo strut]], which was too short when fully extended, and thus easily rectified via the insertion of a ring.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123}}


The general performance of the Ar 232 proved to outperform the Ju 52/3m in multiple respects; it carried roughly double the load over longer distances, operated from shorter runways and rougher fields if need be, and cruised about 70&nbsp;km/h (44&nbsp;mph) faster.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=122}} A further ten pre-production aircraft were constructed; these saw operational used as the '''Ar 232A-0''' while awaiting production versions.
The Ar 232B program ran at the same time. With the quartet of 895&nbsp;kW (1,200&nbsp;hp) Bramo 323s replacing the twin BMW 801s, each Bramo 323 with its aforementioned 550&nbsp;kg dry weight apiece; power increased from 2,386&nbsp;kW (3,200&nbsp;hp) to 3,580&nbsp;kW (4,800&nbsp;hp), solving the A model's problem of having little excess power in case of engine failure. This change also required the wing to be extended slightly, the span increasing just over 3&nbsp;m (9&nbsp;ft 10&nbsp;in) in total. The extra weight of the Bramo nine-cylinder engines also moved the [[Center of gravity of an aircraft|center of gravity]] forward, which was offset by stretching the cargo area rearward another meter, adding to the cargo capacity it could carry internally.


The Ar 232B program proceeded in parallel to this effort. With the quartet of 895&nbsp;kW (1,200&nbsp;hp) Bramo 323s replacing the twin BMW 801s, each Bramo 323 with its aforementioned 550&nbsp;kg dry weight apiece; power increased from 2,386&nbsp;kW (3,200&nbsp;hp) to 3,580&nbsp;kW (4,800&nbsp;hp), solving the Ar 232A's problem of having little excess power in case of engine failure. This change also required the wing to be extended slightly, the span increasing just over 3&nbsp;m (9&nbsp;ft 10&nbsp;in) in total.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=126}} The extra weight of the Bramo 323 engines also moved the [[Center of gravity of an aircraft|center of gravity]] forward, which was offset by stretching the cargo area rearward another meter, expanding the cargo capacity it could carry internally.
Two four-engined prototypes were ordered, the V3 and V4, and V3 first flew in May 1942. A further 10 were then ordered as the '''Ar 232B-0''', and were used widely in an operational role. However, this was the only order for the design, as the ''Luftwaffe'' gave transport aircraft production a very low priority. Many of those produced were used by Arado to transport aircraft parts between its factories, and did not see front-line service.


During May 1942, the first of the two four-engined prototypes, V3, performed its maiden flight. A further 10 aircraft were then ordered as the '''Ar 232B-0''', and were used widely in an operational role. However, this was the only order for the design, as the ''Luftwaffe'' gave transport aircraft production a relatively low priority. Many of those aircraft produced were used by Arado to transport aircraft parts between its factories, and did not see front-line service.
Plans were also made to replace the outer wing sections and control surfaces with wooden versions to conserve [[aluminium]]. Originally to be known as the '''Ar 232C''', the design dragged on and was later renamed the '''Ar 432'''. Plans were finally put into place to start production in October 1945, but the war ended without even a prototype being produced. Two even larger planned versions, the '''Ar 532''' and the '''Ar 632''', would have almost doubled the wingspan to 60&nbsp;m (196&nbsp;ft 10&nbsp;in), as large as Germany's six-engined [[BV 238]] flying boat design, and added another two engines.


Various improvements to the Ar 232 were planned, such as the replacement of the outer wing sections and control surfaces with wooden versions to conserve [[aluminium]].{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=128}} Originally to be known as the '''Ar 232C''', the design effort was protracted and was later redesignated the '''Ar 432'''. During June 1944, plans were finally put into place to start production in October 1945, but the conflict came to an end without even a prototype being produced.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=128-129}} Two even larger planned versions, the '''Ar 532''' and the '''Ar 632''', would have almost doubled the wingspan to 60&nbsp;m (196&nbsp;ft 10&nbsp;in), as large as Germany's six-engined [[BV 238]] flying boat design, and added another two engines. An [[Amphibious aircraft|amphibian]] transport, the '''Ar 430''', was also projected for use in the [[Mediterranean]].{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=129}}
Two of the B-0s were captured by British forces at the end of the war. After test flights by [[Eric Brown (pilot)|Eric "Winkle" Brown]], who gave the design excellent marks, they were used by the [[Royal Air Force]] on flights between England and Germany after the war.


==Design==
==Design==
The Ar 232 was a multi-engined transport aircraft. It was normally operated by a crew of four, of which the [[Aviator|pilot]] was the only member without two roles. The [[navigator]] also operated a 13&nbsp;mm (.51&nbsp;in) [[MG 131 machine gun]] in the nose, while the [[Radioman|radio operator]] could also used a 20&nbsp;mm [[MG 151 cannon]] in a rotating turret on the roof, and the [[loadmaster]] was provisioned with a 13&nbsp;mm (.51&nbsp;in) [[MG 131 machine gun]] that fired rearward from the extreme rear of the cargo bay above the cargo doors.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123}}The aircraft could be outfitted with various auxiliary kits to suit certain operational circumstances, such as winter/tropical kits, a radio set, a rubber [[liferaft]], an oil-burning heater, and a emergency power unit.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123}}
The Ar 232 design resulted from a [[tender offer]]ed by the ''[[Reich Air Ministry|Reichsluftfahrtministerium]]'' (German Air Ministry, RLM) in late 1939 for a replacement for the Ju 52/3m transport. Both Arado and [[Henschel & Son|Henschel]] were asked for rear-loading designs powered by two 1,193&nbsp;kW (1,600&nbsp;hp) [[BMW 801|BMW 801A/B]] [[radial engine]]s,<ref>{{Cite book|last=Chant|first=Christopher|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/41383513|title=Aircraft of World War II|publisher=Barnes & Noble Books|year=1999|isbn=0-7607-1261-1|location=New York|pages=22|oclc=41383513}}</ref> which was just entering prototype production and not currently used on any front-line designs. The Arado design beat out Henschel's after an examination of the plans, and an order for three [[prototype]]s was placed in 1940.


Wilhelm van Nes led the design of the Ar 232. He began at the cargo area, with a bay directly behind the "stepless [[cockpit]]" that was 6.6&nbsp;m (21&nbsp;ft 7¾&nbsp;in) long, 2.3&nbsp;m (7&nbsp;ft 6½&nbsp;in) wide and 2.0&nbsp;m (6&nbsp;ft 6¾&nbsp;in) high. Typical designs of the era used a side-mounted door for access, but the Ar 232 used [[hydraulic]]ally powered clamshell-doors on the rear of the bay with a [[Inclined plane|ramp]] to allow cargo to be rolled into the hold. The [[twin tail]] configuration tail surfaces were mounted on the end of a long boom to keep the area behind the doors clear so trucks could drive right up to the ramp, much like the 1944-era American [[Fairchild C-82 Packet]] of a differing [[twin boom]] fuselage configuration. The high-set tail on its "pod-and-boom" configuration fuselage allowed the Ar 232 to be loaded and unloaded faster than other designs.
The cargo bay of the Ar 232, which was directly behind the aircraft's "stepless [[cockpit]]", was 6.6&nbsp;m (21&nbsp;ft 7¾&nbsp;in) long, 2.3&nbsp;m (7&nbsp;ft 6½&nbsp;in) wide and 2.0&nbsp;m (6&nbsp;ft 6¾&nbsp;in) high. Unlike typical designs of the era that used a side-mounted door for access, the Ar 232 was furnished with [[hydraulic]]ally powered clamshell-doors on the rear of the bay with a [[Inclined plane|ramp]], which permitted cargo to be rolled into the hold. The [[twin tail]] configuration tail surfaces were mounted on the end of a long boom to keep the area behind the doors clear so trucks could drive right up to the ramp, much like the 1944-era American [[Fairchild C-82 Packet]] of a differing [[twin boom]] fuselage configuration. The high-set tail on its "pod-and-boom" configuration fuselage allowed the Ar 232 to be loaded and unloaded faster than other designs. An overhead crane was installed within the cargo bay to assist this process.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123}}


For short-field performance, the Ar 232 incorporated Arado's own "[[Flap (aircraft)|travelling flap]]" design for the entire rear surface of the wing. Even loaded to 16,000&nbsp;kg (35,270&nbsp;lb), it could take-off in 200&nbsp;m (656&nbsp;ft). This distance could be further reduced by using [[Walter HWK 109-500|''Starthilfe'' liquid fuelled monopropellant]] rocket assist ([[JATO|RATO]]) jettisonable propulsion units for take-off.
The Ar 232 was furnished with a three-piece twin-spar wing, comprising all-through rectangular centrepiece that was attached to a pair of trapezoidal outer wings, each accommodating [[self-sealing fuel tank]]s and the main [[landing gear]].{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123}} The entire rear surface of the wing incorporated Arado's own "[[Flap (aircraft)|travelling flap]]" design to achieve excellent short-field performance; these flaps were electronically actuated and interconnected with the [[aileron]]s. Further measures to reduce the landing distance included a [[drogue parachute]] and rockets.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123}} Even when loaded to 16,000&nbsp;kg (35,270&nbsp;lb), the Ar 232 could take off in 200&nbsp;m (656&nbsp;ft); this was in part achieved via a [[Boundary_layer_control#Maintaining_a_laminar_boundary_layer_on_aircraft|boundary layer control system]]. The take-off distance could be further reduced via the use of [[Walter HWK 109-500|''Starthilfe'' liquid fuelled monopropellant]] rocket assist ([[JATO|RATO]]) jettisonable propulsion units.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123}}


Perhaps the most noticeable feature of the Ar 232 was the landing gear. Normal operations from prepared [[runway]]s used a [[tricycle gear]] — a then-novel feature for German military aircraft—but the sideways-retracting main gear's lever-action lower [[oleo strut]] suspended arm – carrying the main gear's wheel/tire unit at the bottoms of the maingears' [[strut]]s could "break", or kneel, after landing to place the fuselage closer to the ground and thereby reduce the ramp angle. An additional set of eleven smaller, non-retractable twinned wheels per side, mounted along the ventral centreline of the fuselage from just behind the semi-retractable nosewheel aftwards to just forward of the wing's trailing edge, supported the aircraft once the main landing gear's lever-action lower arm had "knelt", or could be used for additional support when landing on soft or rough airfields.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123}} The aircraft was intended to be capable of [[taxiing]] at low speeds on its row of small wheels, thus being able to negotiate small obstacles such as ditches up to 1.5&nbsp;m (5&nbsp;ft) in width. The appearance of the row of small wheels led to the nickname "millipede". In flight, the main legs fully retracted inwards into the wings, while the fixed support wheels remained exposed and the nose wheel only semi-retracted, with the nosewheel tire's lowest point while retracted never going above the lowest point of the 22 auxiliary centre-line wheels' tires.<ref>{{harvnb|Sengfelder|1993|p=40-42}}: "A significant advantage of this [Ar 232] aircraft was its rough-field landing gear. With the landing gear in the compressed position, the eleven pairs of wheels mounted on independently-sprung legs beneath the fuselage, together with the wide-track main landing gear (8.4 meter, 27 ft 6 in [[Axle track|wheel track]]) and the levered-suspension nose wheel, endowed the aircraft with outstanding rough field capabilities."</ref>
Normally operated by a crew of four, the [[Aviator|pilot]] was the only member without two roles. The [[navigator]] operated a 13&nbsp;mm (.51&nbsp;in) [[MG 131 machine gun]] in the nose, the [[Radioman|radio operator]] a 20&nbsp;mm [[MG 151 cannon]] in a rotating turret on the roof, and the [[loadmaster]] a 13&nbsp;mm (.51&nbsp;in) [[MG 131 machine gun]] firing rearward from the extreme rear of the cargo bay above the cargo doors.


==Operational history==
===Landing gear design innovations===
German officials intended for the aircraft to be used in a wide variety of circumstances, specific mentions including [[North Africa]] and the [[Arctic]].{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123}}
The most noticeable feature of the Ar 232 was the [[landing gear]]. Normal operations from prepared [[runway]]s used a [[tricycle gear]] — a then-novel feature for German military aircraft—but the sideways-retracting main gear's lever-action lower oleo-strut suspended arm – carrying the main gear's wheel/tire unit at the bottoms of the maingears' [[strut]]s could "break", or kneel, after landing to place the fuselage closer to the ground and thereby reduce the ramp angle. An additional set of eleven smaller, non-retractable twinned wheels per side, mounted along the ventral centreline of the fuselage from just behind the semi-retractable nosewheel aftwards to just forward of the wing's trailing edge, supported the aircraft once the main landing gear's lever-action lower arm had "knelt", or could be used for additional support when landing on soft or rough airfields. The aircraft was intended to be capable of [[taxiing]] at low speeds on its row of small wheels, thus being able to negotiate small obstacles such as ditches up to 1.5&nbsp;m (5&nbsp;ft) in width. The appearance of the row of small wheels led to the nickname "millipede". In flight, the main legs fully retracted inwards into the wings, while the fixed support wheels remained exposed and the nose wheel only semi-retracted, with the nosewheel tire's lowest point while retracted never going above the lowest point of the 22 auxiliary centre-line wheels' tires.<ref>{{cite book |last=Sengfelder |first=Günther |date=1993 |title=German Aircraft Landing Gear |location=Atglen, PA USA |publisher=[[Schiffer Publishing]] |pages=40–42 |isbn=0-88740-470-7 |quote=A significant advantage of this [Ar 232] aircraft was its rough-field landing gear. With the landing gear in the compressed position, the eleven pairs of wheels mounted on independently-sprung legs beneath the fuselage, together with the wide-track main landing gear (8.4 meter, 27 ft 6 in [[Axle track|wheel track]]) and the levered-suspension nose wheel, endowed the aircraft with outstanding rough field capabilities.}}</ref>

In late 1942, in response to the deteriorating situation of the [[Wehrmacht]]'s [[6th Army (Wehrmacht)|6th Army]] during the [[Battle of Stalingrad]], it was decided to deploy the first two Ar 232 prototypes to the [[Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)|Eastern Front]] for the purpose of delivering critical supplies and airlifting casualties {{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=123-124}}

The first prototype was promptly lost along with its entire crew after the pilot became disorientated. The second prototype was more successful, completing multiple missions in January 1943, typically flying in and out of Stalingrad unhindered. Its crew occasionally opted to avoid airfields when enemy forces were known to be waiting in ambush, instead landing on rough terrain, a feat that would have been impossible for most transport aircraft of its size at the time.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=124-125}}

On 17 July 1943, an twin-engined Ar 232 flew from [[Brandenburg]], Germany to [[Banak, Norway]], the northernmost airport in Europe; the flight, which delivered automated weather apparatus, necessitated the fitting of [[Drop tank|auxiliary fuel tanks]]. One month later, the aircraft was lost with all onboard due to a single engine failure shortly after take off followed by a collision with terrain.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=125}}

Outside of conventional military logistics, the Ar 232 found numerous uses; Arado made frequent use of the type to transport high priority aviation components.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=126}}

At least five Ar 232s are believed to have been operated by [[Kampfgeschwader 200]], a secretive special operations unit of the Luftwaffe.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=126-127}} Multiple attempts using Ar 232s were made to infiltrate covert agents behind [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] lines, including a mission under remit of the top secret [[Operation Zeppelin (espionage plan)|Operation Zeppelin]] which intended to assassinate [[Joseph Stalin]] in late 1944.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=127}}

Starting in December 1944, several Ar 232 were directed to fly supplies to a supposed pocket of German military personnel active behind Soviet lines. Despite such flights continuing for months, this effort was entirely fruitless as it was an [[NKVD]] deception operation, known as [[Operation Scherhorn]].{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=127}}

Two Ar 232 B-0s were captured by British forces towards the end of the conflict. Multiple test flights of these aircraft were performed by [[Eric Brown (pilot)|Eric "Winkle" Brown]], who reportedly gave the aircraft an excellent report. Subsequently, they were operated for a time by the [[Royal Air Force]] on flights between England and Germany as late as 1946.{{sfn|Kranzhoff|1997|p=128}}


==Variants==
==Variants==
;Ar 232 V1 & V2:Ar 232A prototypes and research aircraft, powered by two 1,193&nbsp;kW (1,600&nbsp;hp) [[BMW 801|BMW 801A/B]] engines.
;Ar 232 V1 & V2
:Ar 232A prototypes and research aircraft, powered by two 1,193&nbsp;kW (1,600&nbsp;hp) [[BMW 801|BMW 801A/B]] engines.


;Ar 232 V3 & V4:Ar 232B prototypes and research aircraft, powered by four [[BMW Bramo 323R-2 Fafnir]] engines.
;Ar 232 V3 & V4
:Ar 232B prototypes and research aircraft, powered by four [[BMW Bramo 323R-2 Fafnir]] engines.


;Ar 232A
;Ar 232A:Pre-production aircraft used for operational trials, powered by two BMW801 engines, only ten built.
:Pre-production aircraft used for operational trials, powered by two BMW801 engines, only ten built.


;Ar 232B
;Ar 232B:The first production aircraft powered by four Bramo 323 Fafnir engines, only ten built as Ar 232B-0.
:The first production aircraft powered by four Bramo 323 Fafnir engines, only ten built as Ar 232B-0.


;Ar 232C
;Ar 232C:A redesigned version using wood for outer wing sections and control surfaces; redesignated Ar 432.
:A redesigned version using wood for outer wing sections and control surfaces; redesignated Ar 432.


;Ar 432:Redesignation of Ar 232C.
;Ar 432
:Redesignation of Ar 232C.


;Ar 532:Planned enlarged four-engined version of the Ar 432.
;Ar 532
:Planned enlarged four-engined version of the Ar 432.


;Ar 632:Planned enlarged four-engined version of the Ar 432.
;Ar 632
:Planned enlarged four-engined version of the Ar 432.


==Operators==
==Operators==
Line 72: Line 98:
==Specifications (Ar 232B)==
==Specifications (Ar 232B)==
{{Aircraft specs
{{Aircraft specs
|ref=Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933–1945 Vol.1 – AEG-Dornier<ref name=Nowarra>{{cite book |last=Nowarra |first=Heinz J. |title=Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933–1945 Vol.1 – AEG-Dornier |year=1993 |publisher=Bernard & Graefe Verlag |location=Koblenz |isbn=978-3-7637-5464-9 |language=de |pages=64–65, 238–239}}</ref>
|ref= ''Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933–1945 Vol.1 – AEG-Dornier''{{sfn|Nowarra|1993|p=64-65}}{{sfn|Nowarra|1993|p=238-239}}
|prime units?=met
|prime units?= met
<!--
<!--
General characteristics
General characteristics
-->
-->
|crew=4
|crew= 4
|capacity={{cvt|4500|kg|0}} payload
|capacity= {{cvt|4500|kg|0}} payload
|length m=23.52
|length m= 23.52
|length note=
|length note=
|span m=33.5
|span m= 33.5
|span note=
|span note=
|height m=5.69
|height m= 5.69
|height note=
|height note=
|wing area sqm=142.6
|wing area sqm= 142.6
|wing area note=
|wing area note=
|aspect ratio=<!-- sailplanes -->
|aspect ratio=<!-- sailplanes -->
|airfoil=
|airfoil=
|empty weight kg=12780
|empty weight kg= 12,780
|empty weight note=
|empty weight note=
|gross weight kg=
|gross weight kg=
|gross weight note=
|gross weight note=
|max takeoff weight kg=21150
|max takeoff weight kg= 21,150
|max takeoff weight note=
|max takeoff weight note=
|fuel capacity=
|fuel capacity=
Line 100: Line 126:
Powerplant
Powerplant
-->
-->
|eng1 number=4
|eng1 number= 4
|eng1 name=[[BMW Bramo 323R-2 Fafnir]]
|eng1 name= [[BMW Bramo 323R-2 Fafnir]]
|eng1 type=9-cylinder air-cooled radial piston engine
|eng1 type= nine-cylinder air-cooled radial piston engine
|eng1 hp=986
|eng1 hp= 986
|eng1 note=
|eng1 note=


|prop blade number=3
|prop blade number= 3
|prop name=constant-speed propellers
|prop name= constant-speed propellers
|prop dia m=<!-- propeller aircraft -->
|prop dia m=<!-- propeller aircraft -->
|prop dia note=
|prop dia note=
Line 113: Line 139:
Performance
Performance
-->
-->
|max speed kmh=308
|max speed kmh= 308
|max speed note=at {{cvt|4000|m|0}}
|max speed note= at {{cvt|4000|m}}
|cruise speed kmh=290
|cruise speed kmh= 290
|cruise speed note=at {{cvt|2000|m|0}}
|cruise speed note= at {{cvt|2000|m}}
|stall speed kmh=
|stall speed kmh=
|stall speed note=
|stall speed note=
Line 123: Line 149:
|minimum control speed kmh=
|minimum control speed kmh=
|minimum control speed note=
|minimum control speed note=
|range km=1062
|range km= 1,062
|range note=
|range note=
|combat range km=
|combat range km=
Line 130: Line 156:
|ferry range note=
|ferry range note=
|endurance=<!-- if range unknown -->
|endurance=<!-- if range unknown -->
|ceiling m=6900
|ceiling m= 6,900
|ceiling note=
|ceiling note=
|g limits=<!-- aerobatic -->
|g limits=<!-- aerobatic -->
Line 142: Line 168:
|power/mass=
|power/mass=
|more performance=<br/>
|more performance=<br/>
*'''Take-off run:''' {{cvt|200|m|0}} minimum
*'''Take-off run:''' {{cvt|200|m}} minimum
<!--
<!--
Armament
Armament
Line 167: Line 193:
==References==
==References==


===Notes===
===Citations===
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}

==Bibliography==
* {{cite book |last = Kranzhoff |first = Jörg Armin |title = Arado, History of an Aircraft Company |location = Atglen, Pennsylvania, US |publisher = Schiffer Books |date = 1997 |isbn = 0-7643-0293-0}}
* {{cite book |last = Munson |first = Kenneth |title = German Aircraft Of World War 2 in colour |location = Atglen, Pennsylvania, USA |publisher = Schiffer |year = 2002 |isbn = 0-7643-1665-6}}
* {{cite book |last = Myhra |first = David |title = Arado Ar 232 The Luftwaffe's Combat Zone Transport Aircraft In World War II |location = Poole, Dorset, UK |publisher = Blandford Press |year = 1978 |isbn = 0-7137-0860-3}}
* {{cite book |last = Nowarra |first = Heinz J. |title = Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933–1945 Vol.1 – AEG-Dornier |year = 1993 |publisher = Bernard & Graefe Verlag |location = Koblenz, Germany |isbn = 978-3-7637-5464-9 |language = de }}
* {{cite book |last = Sengfelder |first = Günther |date = 1993 |title = German Aircraft Landing Gear |location = Atglen, Pennsylvania, US |publisher = [[Schiffer Publishing]] |isbn = 0-88740-470-7}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==


* {{cite book |last1=Green |first1=William |title=The warplanes of the Third Reich; |date=1979 |publisher=Macdonald & Co |location=London |isbn=0-356-02382-6 |edition=4th impression}}
* {{cite book |last1 = Green |first1 = William |title = The warplanes of the Third Reich; |date = 1979 |publisher = Macdonald & Co |location = London, UK |isbn = 0-356-02382-6 |edition = 4th impression}}
* {{cite book |last1=Myhra |first1=David |title=Arado 232 : the Luftwaffe's combat zone transport aircraft in World War II |date=2002 |publisher=Schiffer Pub |location=Atglen, PA |isbn=0-7643-1665-6}}
* {{cite book |last1 = Myhra |first1 = David |title = Arado 232 : the Luftwaffe's combat zone transport aircraft in World War II |date = 2002 |publisher = Schiffer Pub |location = Atglen, Pennsylvania, US |isbn = 0-7643-1665-6}}
* {{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=J.R. |last2=Kay |first2=Anthony L. |title=German aircraft of the Second World War |date=1972 |publisher=Putnam & Company Ltd. |location=London |isbn=0-370-00024-2}}
* {{cite book |last1 = Smith |first1 = J.R. |last2 = Kay |first2 = Anthony L. |title = German aircraft of the Second World War |date = 1972 |publisher = Putnam & Company Ltd. |location = London, UK |isbn = 0-370-00024-2}}


==External links==
==External links==

Latest revision as of 00:21, 11 March 2024

Ar 232
Arado Ar 232B-0
Role Transport
National origin Germany
Manufacturer Arado Flugzeugwerke
First flight June 1941
Introduction 1943
Retired 1945
Primary user Luftwaffe
Number built ~20

The Arado Ar 232 Tausendfüßler (German: "Millipede"), sometimes also called Tatzelwurm, was a cargo aircraft that was designed and produced in small numbers by the German aircraft manufacturer Arado Flugzeugwerke. It was designed during the first half of the Second World War in response to a request by the Reichsluftfahrtministerium (German Air Ministry, RLM) for a successor or supplemental transport aircraft to the Luftwaffe's obsolescent Junkers Ju 52/3m. The Ar 232 introduced, or brought together, almost all of the features now considered to be standard in modern cargo transport aircraft designs, including a box-like fuselage slung beneath a high wing; a rear loading ramp (that had first appeared on the December 1939-flown Junkers Ju 90 V5 fifth prototype four-engined transport via its Trapoklappe), a high-mounted twin tail for easy access to the hold and features for operating from rough fields. It was initially requested to be powered by a pair of BMW 801A/B radial engines, however, an alternative arrangement of four BMW Bramo 323 engines was adopted instead due to a lack of capacity.

The first twin-engine prototype performing its maiden flight in June 1941, while the first four-engine prototype followed roughly one year later. The type demonstrated clear performance advantages over the Ju 52/3m and limited pre-production orders were placed, leading to roughly 20 aircraft being constructed. The envisioned mass production of the Ar 232 was never attained, primarily due to Germany having an abundance of transport aircraft in production and thus it did not purchase large numbers of Ar 232s. Several aircraft did see operational use, to aid wartime production efforts and on the front line. Arado's design team continued to work on refinements, including economy measures and the enlarged six-engined Ar 632 variant. At one point, German officials expected quantity production of the type to be attained in October 1945 but the war ended instead. Two Ar 232s were captured by the British and operated for a time between England and Germany following the conflict.

Development[edit]

What would become the Ar 232 originated from a tender offered by the Reichsluftfahrtministerium (RLM/German Aviation Ministry) issued during late 1939 which sought a replacement for the ubiquitous Ju 52/3m transport. Both Arado and Henschel were requested to design a rear-loading aircraft that was to be powered by a pair of 1,193 kW (1,600 hp) BMW 801A/B radial engines,[1] which was just entering prototype production and not currently used on any front-line designs. Arado's design team was headed by the aeronatical engineer Wilhelm van Nes. The basic configuration selected was that of a cantilever mid-wing smooth-skinned monocoque design with a spacious cargo area that was as low to the ground as feasibly possible. Furthermore, the aircraft was to be relatively robust and capable of operating from austere airstrips and rough terrain, possess short takeoff and landing (STOL) capabilities, and permit rapid loading and unloading times.[2]

Following a review of the competing aircraft, Arado's design was selected over Henschel's, leading to the company receiving an initial order for three prototypes in 1940. However, challenges for the Ar 232 soon became apparent in the form of the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 project, which had been also earmarked to use the same BMW 801A/B engine. However, production of the BMW 801 was deemed to be insufficient to fulfil all of the prospective demands, thus Arado was compelled to adopt an alternative engine for the Ar 232. Eventually, the BMW Bramo 323 Fafnir nine-cylinder radial engine, weighing roughly 550 kg (1,210 lbs) each, from Focke-Wulf's Fw 200 land-based maritime patrol aircraft was selected as the alternate powerplant instead. The Bramo 323 was already in production and could meet requirements if the Ar 232 really did replace the Ju 52/3m in service. The prototypes were far enough along that switching engines would have seriously delayed the program, thus the first two aircraft were to be completed as the Ar 232A, while the third and a newly ordered fourth prototype were designated as the Ar 232B. The third and fourth prototypes (and all production aircraft) used four engines (in place of the two specified in the RLM specification) in order to provide the desired performance.

An Ar 232A-0 in 1945

The first two prototypes, bearing the Stammkennzeichen alphabetic codes GH+GN and VD+YB[3] respectively, were completed in early 1941 and commenced trials as soon as possible. The first flight, while otherwise uneventful, suffered a partial landing gear failure during landing; while the nose gear collapsed, the twenty-two "millipede wheels" saved the aircraft from damage. The cause was determined to be a stuck oleo strut, which was too short when fully extended, and thus easily rectified via the insertion of a ring.[4]

The general performance of the Ar 232 proved to outperform the Ju 52/3m in multiple respects; it carried roughly double the load over longer distances, operated from shorter runways and rougher fields if need be, and cruised about 70 km/h (44 mph) faster.[5] A further ten pre-production aircraft were constructed; these saw operational used as the Ar 232A-0 while awaiting production versions.

The Ar 232B program proceeded in parallel to this effort. With the quartet of 895 kW (1,200 hp) Bramo 323s replacing the twin BMW 801s, each Bramo 323 with its aforementioned 550 kg dry weight apiece; power increased from 2,386 kW (3,200 hp) to 3,580 kW (4,800 hp), solving the Ar 232A's problem of having little excess power in case of engine failure. This change also required the wing to be extended slightly, the span increasing just over 3 m (9 ft 10 in) in total.[6] The extra weight of the Bramo 323 engines also moved the center of gravity forward, which was offset by stretching the cargo area rearward another meter, expanding the cargo capacity it could carry internally.

During May 1942, the first of the two four-engined prototypes, V3, performed its maiden flight. A further 10 aircraft were then ordered as the Ar 232B-0, and were used widely in an operational role. However, this was the only order for the design, as the Luftwaffe gave transport aircraft production a relatively low priority. Many of those aircraft produced were used by Arado to transport aircraft parts between its factories, and did not see front-line service.

Various improvements to the Ar 232 were planned, such as the replacement of the outer wing sections and control surfaces with wooden versions to conserve aluminium.[7] Originally to be known as the Ar 232C, the design effort was protracted and was later redesignated the Ar 432. During June 1944, plans were finally put into place to start production in October 1945, but the conflict came to an end without even a prototype being produced.[8] Two even larger planned versions, the Ar 532 and the Ar 632, would have almost doubled the wingspan to 60 m (196 ft 10 in), as large as Germany's six-engined BV 238 flying boat design, and added another two engines. An amphibian transport, the Ar 430, was also projected for use in the Mediterranean.[9]

Design[edit]

The Ar 232 was a multi-engined transport aircraft. It was normally operated by a crew of four, of which the pilot was the only member without two roles. The navigator also operated a 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine gun in the nose, while the radio operator could also used a 20 mm MG 151 cannon in a rotating turret on the roof, and the loadmaster was provisioned with a 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine gun that fired rearward from the extreme rear of the cargo bay above the cargo doors.[4]The aircraft could be outfitted with various auxiliary kits to suit certain operational circumstances, such as winter/tropical kits, a radio set, a rubber liferaft, an oil-burning heater, and a emergency power unit.[4]

The cargo bay of the Ar 232, which was directly behind the aircraft's "stepless cockpit", was 6.6 m (21 ft 7¾ in) long, 2.3 m (7 ft 6½ in) wide and 2.0 m (6 ft 6¾ in) high. Unlike typical designs of the era that used a side-mounted door for access, the Ar 232 was furnished with hydraulically powered clamshell-doors on the rear of the bay with a ramp, which permitted cargo to be rolled into the hold. The twin tail configuration tail surfaces were mounted on the end of a long boom to keep the area behind the doors clear so trucks could drive right up to the ramp, much like the 1944-era American Fairchild C-82 Packet of a differing twin boom fuselage configuration. The high-set tail on its "pod-and-boom" configuration fuselage allowed the Ar 232 to be loaded and unloaded faster than other designs. An overhead crane was installed within the cargo bay to assist this process.[4]

The Ar 232 was furnished with a three-piece twin-spar wing, comprising all-through rectangular centrepiece that was attached to a pair of trapezoidal outer wings, each accommodating self-sealing fuel tanks and the main landing gear.[4] The entire rear surface of the wing incorporated Arado's own "travelling flap" design to achieve excellent short-field performance; these flaps were electronically actuated and interconnected with the ailerons. Further measures to reduce the landing distance included a drogue parachute and rockets.[4] Even when loaded to 16,000 kg (35,270 lb), the Ar 232 could take off in 200 m (656 ft); this was in part achieved via a boundary layer control system. The take-off distance could be further reduced via the use of Starthilfe liquid fuelled monopropellant rocket assist (RATO) jettisonable propulsion units.[4]

Perhaps the most noticeable feature of the Ar 232 was the landing gear. Normal operations from prepared runways used a tricycle gear — a then-novel feature for German military aircraft—but the sideways-retracting main gear's lever-action lower oleo strut suspended arm – carrying the main gear's wheel/tire unit at the bottoms of the maingears' struts could "break", or kneel, after landing to place the fuselage closer to the ground and thereby reduce the ramp angle. An additional set of eleven smaller, non-retractable twinned wheels per side, mounted along the ventral centreline of the fuselage from just behind the semi-retractable nosewheel aftwards to just forward of the wing's trailing edge, supported the aircraft once the main landing gear's lever-action lower arm had "knelt", or could be used for additional support when landing on soft or rough airfields.[4] The aircraft was intended to be capable of taxiing at low speeds on its row of small wheels, thus being able to negotiate small obstacles such as ditches up to 1.5 m (5 ft) in width. The appearance of the row of small wheels led to the nickname "millipede". In flight, the main legs fully retracted inwards into the wings, while the fixed support wheels remained exposed and the nose wheel only semi-retracted, with the nosewheel tire's lowest point while retracted never going above the lowest point of the 22 auxiliary centre-line wheels' tires.[10]

Operational history[edit]

German officials intended for the aircraft to be used in a wide variety of circumstances, specific mentions including North Africa and the Arctic.[4]

In late 1942, in response to the deteriorating situation of the Wehrmacht's 6th Army during the Battle of Stalingrad, it was decided to deploy the first two Ar 232 prototypes to the Eastern Front for the purpose of delivering critical supplies and airlifting casualties [11]

The first prototype was promptly lost along with its entire crew after the pilot became disorientated. The second prototype was more successful, completing multiple missions in January 1943, typically flying in and out of Stalingrad unhindered. Its crew occasionally opted to avoid airfields when enemy forces were known to be waiting in ambush, instead landing on rough terrain, a feat that would have been impossible for most transport aircraft of its size at the time.[12]

On 17 July 1943, an twin-engined Ar 232 flew from Brandenburg, Germany to Banak, Norway, the northernmost airport in Europe; the flight, which delivered automated weather apparatus, necessitated the fitting of auxiliary fuel tanks. One month later, the aircraft was lost with all onboard due to a single engine failure shortly after take off followed by a collision with terrain.[13]

Outside of conventional military logistics, the Ar 232 found numerous uses; Arado made frequent use of the type to transport high priority aviation components.[6]

At least five Ar 232s are believed to have been operated by Kampfgeschwader 200, a secretive special operations unit of the Luftwaffe.[14] Multiple attempts using Ar 232s were made to infiltrate covert agents behind Soviet lines, including a mission under remit of the top secret Operation Zeppelin which intended to assassinate Joseph Stalin in late 1944.[15]

Starting in December 1944, several Ar 232 were directed to fly supplies to a supposed pocket of German military personnel active behind Soviet lines. Despite such flights continuing for months, this effort was entirely fruitless as it was an NKVD deception operation, known as Operation Scherhorn.[15]

Two Ar 232 B-0s were captured by British forces towards the end of the conflict. Multiple test flights of these aircraft were performed by Eric "Winkle" Brown, who reportedly gave the aircraft an excellent report. Subsequently, they were operated for a time by the Royal Air Force on flights between England and Germany as late as 1946.[7]

Variants[edit]

Ar 232 V1 & V2
Ar 232A prototypes and research aircraft, powered by two 1,193 kW (1,600 hp) BMW 801A/B engines.
Ar 232 V3 & V4
Ar 232B prototypes and research aircraft, powered by four BMW Bramo 323R-2 Fafnir engines.
Ar 232A
Pre-production aircraft used for operational trials, powered by two BMW801 engines, only ten built.
Ar 232B
The first production aircraft powered by four Bramo 323 Fafnir engines, only ten built as Ar 232B-0.
Ar 232C
A redesigned version using wood for outer wing sections and control surfaces; redesignated Ar 432.
Ar 432
Redesignation of Ar 232C.
Ar 532
Planned enlarged four-engined version of the Ar 432.
Ar 632
Planned enlarged four-engined version of the Ar 432.

Operators[edit]

 Germany

Specifications (Ar 232B)[edit]

Data from Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933–1945 Vol.1 – AEG-Dornier[16][17]

General characteristics

  • Crew: 4
  • Capacity: 4,500 kg (9,921 lb) payload
  • Length: 23.52 m (77 ft 2 in)
  • Wingspan: 33.5 m (109 ft 11 in)
  • Height: 5.69 m (18 ft 8 in)
  • Wing area: 142.6 m2 (1,535 sq ft)
  • Empty weight: 12,780 kg (28,175 lb)
  • Max takeoff weight: 21,150 kg (46,628 lb)
  • Powerplant: 4 × BMW Bramo 323R-2 Fafnir nine-cylinder air-cooled radial piston engine, 735 kW (986 hp) each
  • Propellers: 3-bladed constant-speed propellers

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 308 km/h (191 mph, 166 kn) at 4,000 m (13,000 ft)
  • Cruise speed: 290 km/h (180 mph, 160 kn) at 2,000 m (6,600 ft)
  • Range: 1,062 km (660 mi, 573 nmi)
  • Service ceiling: 6,900 m (22,600 ft)
  • Take-off run: 200 m (660 ft) minimum

Armament

  • Guns:

See also[edit]

Related lists

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Chant 1999, p. 22.
  2. ^ Kranzhoff 1997, p. 122-123.
  3. ^ Munson 2002, p. 22.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i Kranzhoff 1997, p. 123.
  5. ^ Kranzhoff 1997, p. 122.
  6. ^ a b Kranzhoff 1997, p. 126.
  7. ^ a b Kranzhoff 1997, p. 128.
  8. ^ Kranzhoff 1997, p. 128-129.
  9. ^ Kranzhoff 1997, p. 129.
  10. ^ Sengfelder 1993, p. 40-42: "A significant advantage of this [Ar 232] aircraft was its rough-field landing gear. With the landing gear in the compressed position, the eleven pairs of wheels mounted on independently-sprung legs beneath the fuselage, together with the wide-track main landing gear (8.4 meter, 27 ft 6 in wheel track) and the levered-suspension nose wheel, endowed the aircraft with outstanding rough field capabilities."
  11. ^ Kranzhoff 1997, p. 123-124.
  12. ^ Kranzhoff 1997, p. 124-125.
  13. ^ Kranzhoff 1997, p. 125.
  14. ^ Kranzhoff 1997, p. 126-127.
  15. ^ a b Kranzhoff 1997, p. 127.
  16. ^ Nowarra 1993, p. 64-65.
  17. ^ Nowarra 1993, p. 238-239.

Bibliography[edit]

  • Kranzhoff, Jörg Armin (1997). Arado, History of an Aircraft Company. Atglen, Pennsylvania, US: Schiffer Books. ISBN 0-7643-0293-0.
  • Munson, Kenneth (2002). German Aircraft Of World War 2 in colour. Atglen, Pennsylvania, USA: Schiffer. ISBN 0-7643-1665-6.
  • Myhra, David (1978). Arado Ar 232 The Luftwaffe's Combat Zone Transport Aircraft In World War II. Poole, Dorset, UK: Blandford Press. ISBN 0-7137-0860-3.
  • Nowarra, Heinz J. (1993). Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933–1945 Vol.1 – AEG-Dornier (in German). Koblenz, Germany: Bernard & Graefe Verlag. ISBN 978-3-7637-5464-9.
  • Sengfelder, Günther (1993). German Aircraft Landing Gear. Atglen, Pennsylvania, US: Schiffer Publishing. ISBN 0-88740-470-7.

Further reading[edit]

  • Green, William (1979). The warplanes of the Third Reich; (4th impression ed.). London, UK: Macdonald & Co. ISBN 0-356-02382-6.
  • Myhra, David (2002). Arado 232 : the Luftwaffe's combat zone transport aircraft in World War II. Atglen, Pennsylvania, US: Schiffer Pub. ISBN 0-7643-1665-6.
  • Smith, J.R.; Kay, Anthony L. (1972). German aircraft of the Second World War. London, UK: Putnam & Company Ltd. ISBN 0-370-00024-2.

External links[edit]