Referendum in France in 1969 on Senate and regional reform
The 1969 referendum in France on Senate and regional reform took place on April 27, 1969. The planned reform included a transformation of the Senate and the introduction of regions as new regional authorities. The bill was rejected by a majority of voters. As a result of the vote defeat, Charles de Gaulle resigned from the office of President.
prehistory
The national crisis of 1958 brought Charles de Gaulle to power, who introduced a fundamental change in the French constitution towards a presidential democracy. De Gaulle became the first President of this new Fifth French Republic . During his tenure as president, de Gaulle used the plebiscite several times to have important political decisions confirmed directly by the people - in the context of the Algerian crisis of 1961-62 and on the question of the direct election of the president in 1962.
In May 1968 there was a new crisis, which began with student riots in Paris, then developed into real street battles with barricades and finally culminated in a nationwide general strike. On May 30, 1968, de Gaulle called on the French to return to orderly conditions and announced new elections. The unrest subsided and in the elections for the National Assembly on June 23 and 30, 1968 , the ruling Gaullists gained significantly more votes and seats in parliament, so that de Gaulle's political position seemed stronger.
In response to the May riots in Paris, in which many dissatisfactions with the political and economic conditions had erupted, de Gaulle declared in a speech on May 24, 1968 that it was necessary to change French society ( «nécessité d ' une mutation de la société française » ). This includes a reform of the universities, the economy and the world of life and work. The aim must be an increased involvement of the population in the political decision-making processes, the results of which they are directly affected.
«Tout indique que cette mutation doit comporter une participation plus étendue de chacun à la marche et aux résultats de l'activité qui le concerne directement. »
"Everything indicates that this change must involve wider participation of all in the outcomes of the activities that directly affect them."
In the speech, de Gaulle announced a referendum on state reform. The date of the referendum was then postponed and finally set for April 27, 1969. The envisaged reform included two constitutional reforms: on the one hand, a reform of the second chamber of parliament, the Senate and, on the other, a regional reform for decentralization.
Regional reform project
Since the beginning of the 20th century at the latest, there have been political tendencies in France to reduce the centralization of political life, which was brought to a head during the French Revolution and the subsequent Napoleonic period. This tendency continued in the Fourth and Fifth Republic. By decree of June 30, 1955, regional action programs ( programmes d'action regional ) were brought into being. These action programs were intended to promote the economic development of underdeveloped regions and were not intended to be separate legal entities. They were financed by the responsible ministries and were each chaired by a Département Prefect ( Préfet coordonnateur ), who was advised by a conference interdepartementale . Since 1959/60 there were 21 regional action groups ( circonscriptions d'action regional ).
The draft law submitted in the 1969 referendum provided that the regions should in future receive the status of local authorities ( collectivites territoriales ). The task of these institutions should be to promote economic, social and cultural development. Organs of the region should be a regional prefect and an elected regional council.
Senate reform project
The envisaged reform of the Senate included, on the one hand, a merger with the Economic and Social Council ( Conseil économique et social ) to form a new Senate, which was supposed to only have an advisory function without legislative competence. The new Senate was to consist of 173 senators (160 from metropolitan France , 7 from the Départements d'outre-mer , 6 from the Territoires d'outre-mer ), who were to be elected for 6 instead of 9 years. These should be elected indirectly in the regions by the elected representatives, regional councils, departmental councils and representatives of the cities. The minimum age for eligibility has been reduced from 35 to 23 years. 4 Senators were to represent the French abroad and were appointed by the Conseil supérieur des Français de l'étranger (Supreme Council of French Abroad). 146 senators should represent economic, social and cultural activities and be elected by appropriate institutions (42 for employees, 30 for agriculture, 36 for companies, 10 for families, 8 for professions, 8 for research and science and 12 for social and cultural activities).
Political positions
The plans for constitutional reform sparked different reactions in the political camps. While the Gaullists predominantly supported the project, the party leader of the Socialists ( SFIO ) Guy Mollet spoke of a “wrong regionalization, a wrong participation” and a “falsified referendum” and called for rejection. The main argument of the political left was the rejection of the quasi-abolition of the Senate. The communists were against it on principle and Jacques Duhamel from the centrist Progrès et démocratie moderne (PDM) expressed skepticism. Some critics complained about the planned regional reform that it did not go far enough and that the competencies of the new regions were insufficient. Prominent figures in the bourgeois camp who spoke out in favor of a no vote were Valéry Giscard d'Estaing and Interior Minister Raymond Marcellin . Old political enmities emerged in the election campaign. Supporters of an Algérie française like Jacques Soustelle , who felt betrayed by de Gaulle in 1961/62, spoke in favor of a “no” vote.
Opinion polls in the months leading up to the referendum showed that the electorate was roughly 1: 1 split. de Gaulle linked the vote to his political future. He said he would resign in the event of an election defeat. This statement, which was probably intended as a means of exerting pressure on the Gaullists who were still undecided, lost its effect when the popular ex-Prime Minister Georges Pompidou declared that he would be standing as a candidate for the presidency if necessary.
Question of the referendum
The referendum question was:
«Approvez-vous le projet de loi soumis au peuple français par le président de la République et relatif à la création de régions et à la rénovation du Sénat? »
"Do you agree to the bill proposed by the President of the Republic to the French people, which includes the creation of regions and the renewal of the Senate?"
Results
Overall result
The turnout was high at 80.13%. The voters rejected the draft constitutional reform with a relatively narrow but clear majority of 52.41%.
Voters | number | percent |
---|---|---|
Eligible voters | 29,392,390 | 100.0% |
Votes cast | 23,552,611 | 80.13% |
Valid votes | 22,908,855 | 97.26% |
Yes votes | 10,901,753 | 47.59% |
Vote no | 12.007.102 | 52.41% |
Results in metropolitan France
The following table shows the results in metropolitan France by department . The majority of the departments voted against the reform draft. The highest proportion of “yes” votes was found in the north-west and east ( Alsace , parts of Lorraine , Franche-Comté and Champagne ), in the western Massif Central , in Béarn , and on Corsica .
Department | electoral legitimate |
electoral participation |
Percent yes |
Percent no |
Percent Invalid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ain | 201,517 | 74.6 | 47.4 | 52.6 | 2.6 |
Aisne | 294.052 | 83.7 | 45.7 | 54.3 | 2.6 |
Allier | 242,967 | 79.0 | 40.2 | 59.8 | 2.8 |
Basses-Alpes | 65,244 | 80.4 | 42.9 | 57.1 | 3.0 |
Hautes-Alpes | 58,489 | 78.7 | 47.6 | 52.4 | 2.6 |
Alpes-Maritimes | 425.429 | 80.0 | 40.2 | 59.8 | 2.5 |
Ardèche | 166.310 | 79.1 | 49.4 | 50.6 | 2.5 |
Ardennes | 165.907 | 80.9 | 48.2 | 51.8 | 2.6 |
Ariège | 94,419 | 78.4 | 40.7 | 59.3 | 2.1 |
Aube | 155,436 | 80.9 | 48.2 | 51.8 | 3.0 |
Aude | 176.049 | 82.4 | 38.4 | 61.6 | 2.5 |
Aveyron | 187.865 | 80.8 | 53.2 | 46.8 | 4.3 |
Bouches-du-Rhône | 765.247 | 78.3 | 38.5 | 61.5 | 2.2 |
Calvados | 291,528 | 81.2 | 50.1 | 49.9 | 2.7 |
Cantal | 110.019 | 75.1 | 56.4 | 43.6 | 2.3 |
Charente | 206.275 | 79.8 | 45.2 | 54.8 | 3.1 |
Charente-Maritime | 295,800 | 77.5 | 45.2 | 54.8 | 2.7 |
Cher | 187.026 | 79.7 | 44.3 | 55.7 | 2.7 |
Corrèze | 161,304 | 82.1 | 43.5 | 56.5 | 2.3 |
Corsica | 181.226 | 57.7 | 54.1 | 45.9 | 0.8 |
Côte-d'Or | 237,636 | 77.8 | 47.4 | 52.6 | 2.9 |
Côtes-du-Nord | 329.222 | 83.3 | 49.3 | 50.7 | 2.4 |
Creuse | 110,369 | 72.9 | 43.5 | 56.5 | 2.3 |
Dordogne | 252.496 | 83.6 | 44.2 | 55.8 | 2.9 |
Doubs | 227,771 | 80.9 | 51.8 | 48.2 | 2.8 |
Drôme | 202.199 | 78.5 | 42.6 | 57.4 | 2.5 |
Your | 220.479 | 82.4 | 44.6 | 55.4 | 2.7 |
Eure-et-Loir | 178,960 | 82.3 | 49.1 | 50.9 | 3.0 |
Finistère | 497.906 | 81.3 | 57.3 | 42.7 | 1.9 |
Gard | 286,460 | 79.4 | 40.3 | 59.7 | 2.7 |
Haute-Garonne | 396.824 | 79.5 | 41.2 | 58.8 | 2.7 |
Gers | 114,484 | 78.1 | 38.4 | 61.6 | 2.8 |
Gironde | 595,342 | 79.3 | 42.9 | 57.1 | 2.4 |
Herault | 337,688 | 78.7 | 39.8 | 60.2 | 2.3 |
Ille-et-Vilaine | 389,949 | 81.5 | 58.9 | 41.1 | 3.2 |
Indre | 160,736 | 79.9 | 41.6 | 58.4 | 3.3 |
Indre-et-Loire | 252,416 | 79.5 | 44.9 | 55.1 | 4.5 |
Isère | 417.881 | 78.3 | 40.9 | 59.1 | 2.2 |
law | 143,688 | 78.8 | 45.3 | 54.7 | 3.2 |
Country | 180.156 | 83.1 | 49.8 | 50.2 | 2.3 |
Loir-et-Cher | 164.817 | 82.0 | 43.1 | 56.9 | 3.1 |
Loire | 416.122 | 75.9 | 47.0 | 53.0 | 3.0 |
Haute Loire | 137.374 | 76.9 | 53.4 | 46.6 | 3.2 |
Loire-Atlantique | 505.348 | 81.3 | 52.6 | 47.4 | 2.9 |
Loiret | 250,745 | 81.9 | 49.9 | 50.1 | 3.3 |
Lot | 101,098 | 82.9 | 45.1 | 54.9 | 2.6 |
Lot-et-Garonne | 177,697 | 82.7 | 39.7 | 60.3 | 3.1 |
Lozère | 53,070 | 76.5 | 61.0 | 39.0 | 2.9 |
Maine-et-Loire | 338304 | 79.9 | 58.0 | 42.0 | 3.5 |
Some | 269.028 | 80.1 | 58.4 | 41.6 | 3.2 |
Marne | 266,456 | 80.2 | 47.9 | 52.1 | 3.0 |
Haute-Marne | 121,933 | 80.8 | 53.0 | 47.0 | 3.3 |
Mayenne | 153,725 | 82.8 | 59.5 | 40.5 | 4.5 |
Meurthe-et-Moselle | 376.285 | 80.7 | 43.5 | 56.5 | 2.7 |
Meuse | 120,406 | 81.4 | 54.2 | 45.8 | 3.0 |
Morbihan | 338.311 | 80.8 | 61.3 | 38.7 | 2.5 |
Moselle | 493.094 | 81.4 | 59.8 | 40.2 | 2.7 |
Nièvre | 155,894 | 81.0 | 39.0 | 61.0 | 2.5 |
North | 1.330.147 | 85.8 | 48.3 | 51.7 | 2.8 |
Oise | 292.914 | 83.4 | 46.1 | 53.9 | 2.9 |
Orne | 169,548 | 81.0 | 51.0 | 49.0 | 3.1 |
Pas-de-Calais | 769.220 | 86.4 | 45.5 | 54.5 | 2.4 |
Puy-de-Dôme | 322.279 | 77.6 | 41.5 | 58.5 | 2.7 |
Basses-Pyrénées | 314.810 | 79.9 | 53.1 | 46.9 | 2.2 |
Hautes-Pyrénées | 141.008 | 77.7 | 43.3 | 56.7 | 2.2 |
Pyrénées-Orientales | 169.386 | 77.3 | 38.6 | 61.4 | 2.5 |
Bas-Rhin | 468.938 | 76.2 | 68.2 | 31.8 | 3.0 |
Haut-Rhin | 342,381 | 78.8 | 67.6 | 32.4 | 3.5 |
Rhône | 684,581 | 79.1 | 42.2 | 57.8 | 2.6 |
Haute-Saône | 132,558 | 81.8 | 48.5 | 51.5 | 3.1 |
Saône-et-Loire | 333.253 | 75.6 | 46.7 | 53.3 | 2.8 |
Sarthe | 271.155 | 80.8 | 48.6 | 51.4 | 3.1 |
Savoie | 165.951 | 75.3 | 45.3 | 54.7 | 2.5 |
Haute-Savoie | 211,429 | 76.3 | 47.7 | 52.3 | 2.6 |
Paris | 1,439,646 | 79.0 | 44.0 | 56.0 | 2.6 |
Seine-Maritime | 634.834 | 81.6 | 44.4 | 55.6 | 2.8 |
Seine-et-Marne | 339,562 | 81.0 | 46.0 | 54.0 | 2.7 |
Yvelines | 453.616 | 83.3 | 43.2 | 56.8 | 2.7 |
Deux-Sèvres | 200,641 | 80.3 | 52.7 | 47.3 | 4.1 |
Somme | 301,346 | 87.0 | 45.5 | 54.5 | 2.7 |
Camouflage | 210.353 | 84.5 | 45.5 | 54.5 | 3.7 |
Tarn-et-Garonne | 112,400 | 82.5 | 44.4 | 55.6 | 3.5 |
Var | 328.039 | 78.5 | 42.7 | 57.3 | 2.2 |
Vaucluse | 202,890 | 82.5 | 38.3 | 61.7 | 3.4 |
Vendée | 259.117 | 83.4 | 64.1 | 35.9 | 4.2 |
Vienne | 207.007 | 80.1 | 49.3 | 50.7 | 3.4 |
Haute-Vienne | 237,705 | 77.7 | 41.2 | 58.8 | 3.0 |
Vosges | 232,540 | 79.2 | 53.8 | 46.2 | 4.0 |
Yonne | 174,233 | 80.5 | 47.9 | 52.1 | 2.8 |
Territoire de Belfort | 65,059 | 79.7 | 47.7 | 52.3 | 2.5 |
Essonne | 358.971 | 83.6 | 41.4 | 58.6 | 2.7 |
Hauts-de-Seine | 794.313 | 82.6 | 41.3 | 58.7 | 2.6 |
Seine-Saint-Denis | 626.754 | 83.1 | 37.0 | 63.0 | 2.3 |
Val-de-Marne | 592.990 | 82.5 | 40.1 | 59.9 | 2.4 |
Val d'Oise | 359,640 | 83.3 | 40.3 | 59.7 | 2.4 |
Results in the overseas departments
All overseas departments voted for the bill with a large majority.
Department | electoral legitimate |
electoral participation |
Percent yes |
Percent no |
Percent Invalid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
French Guyana | 16,765 | 42.3 | 79.0 | 21.0 | 4.3 |
Guadeloupe | 136.175 | 34.7 | 73.9 | 26.1 | 3.5 |
Martinique | 151.981 | 55.5 | 88.6 | 11.4 | 4.3 |
Reunion | 176.296 | 62.1 | 91.5 | 8.5 | 1.1 |
Results in the overseas territories
Of the overseas territories, only French Polynesia voted against the reform, all the others voted for it with a large majority in some cases.
Department | electoral legitimate |
electoral participation |
Percent yes |
Percent no |
Percent Invalid |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Afar and Issa Territory | 43.113 | 89.9 | 97.3 | 2.7 | 0.9 |
Comoros | 123.256 | 89.5 | 99.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
French Polynesia | 40.504 | 71.4 | 47.0 | 53.0 | 0.7 |
New Caledonia and New Hebrides | 41,812 | 65.7 | 54.2 | 45.8 | 1.4 |
Saint-Pierre and Miquelon | 3.231 | 72.6 | 87.8 | 12.2 | 3.3 |
Wallis and Futuna | 3,565 | 90.5 | 74.9 | 25.1 | 0.8 |
Further development
After the result of the referendum became known, de Gaulle declared in a speech on April 28, 1969 that he would immediately resign from the office of President. According to the constitution, Senate President Alain Poher took over the office temporarily. On June 1 and 15, 1969, the new election of the president took place, which Georges Pompidou won.
On July 5, 1972, the law on regional reform was passed ( Loi no. 72-619 du 5 juillet 1972 portant creation et organization des régions ). However, the 21 regions created by the law ( special regulations applied to the Région parisienne ) were not regional authorities, but institutions under public law ( établissement public ). With the regional reform in 1982, the regions received the status of local authorities.
Individual evidence
- ↑ a b Frédéric Bon: Le référendum du 27 avril 1969: suicide politique ou nécessité stratégique? In: Revue française de science . tape 20 , no. 2 , 1970, p. 205–223 , doi : 10.3406 / rfsp. 1970.393222 (French, persee.fr ).
- ^ A b Manfred Dauses: Basic features of the regional reform in France . In: German Administrative Gazette (DVBL) . tape 89 , August 15, 1974, p. 613-619 ( kobv.de [PDF]).
- ^ A b c Serge Berstein: The Republic of de Gaulle 1958-1969 . Cambridge University Press, 1993, ISBN 978-0-521-25239-3 , pp. 273 (English).
- ^ Reform by referendum. ZEIT online, February 7, 1969, accessed on February 26, 2017 .
- ↑ Référendum de 1969: participation et réforme du Sénat. www.france-politique.fr, accessed on February 26, 2017 (French).
- ↑ a b Conseil Constitutionnel: PROCLAMATION des résultats du référendum du 27 avril 1969 concernant le projet de loi relatif à la création de régions et à la rénovation du Sénat . In: Journal Officiel de la Republique Française . May 3, 1969, p. 4445–4446 (French, gouv.fr [PDF]).
- ^ Theo Sommer : The General's Farewell. ZEIT online, May 2, 1969, accessed February 26, 2017 .
- ^ Robert J. Jackson: The succession of Georges Pompidou: The French Presidential election of 1969 . tape 61 , no. 2 . Wiley & Sons, April 1970, pp. 156–169 , doi : 10.1111 / j.1467-923X.1970.tb01161.x (English).