Type locality of the Anisium - Ladinium border, a limestone outcrop near Bagolino in the Italian Alps, a close-up of the "Golden Spike" at the bottom right.
Global Stratotype Section and Point (also Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point , literally "Profile and point of the global border stratotype", GSSP for short ) is the name for a geological outcrop with marine sedimentary rocks that serves as a reference ( type locality ) for the boundary of a chronostratigraphic unit is used. The geological profile of the outcrop is geologically examined and described in detail. The position of the corresponding boundary in the profile is usually defined by the first appearance of a certain fossil and marked in the outcrop.
The GSSP method defines a chronostratigraphic unit by the type ( stratotype ) and its "base" ( point ). The type consists of a reference profile (English reference section , correspondingly also type profile, English stratotype section , called) of sedimentary rocks, in the sequence of layers of which a certain position is determined as the lower limit (precisely the "base") of the unit. This position is referred to as the golden spike based on the image of a large, marking nail . Most lower limits coincide with the first or last date of occurrence of a particular Fossil - species together ( "biostratigraphical" demarcation) and / or by a palaeomagnetic in anomaly ( "magnetostratigraphic" demarcation) and / or have a stratigraphic marker on, the air anomaly or indicates a climatic change ("climatic" demarcation), with isotope anomalies serving as markers. Ideally, at least one of these features occurs worldwide in every old layer sequence. The chronostratigraphic unit defined in this way includes all rocks that were formed between this limit and the limit of the following unit of equal rank. A GSSP is determined by international bodies such as the International Commission of Stratigraphy after an intensive selection process and is accepted by virtually all geoscientists in the sense of a clear description of the content of the chronostratigraphic units.
advantages
Compared to other methods (e.g. exclusively by means of biostratigraphy or through a geochronological absolute age), this type of definition of a chronostratigraphic unit has some advantages: It is objective in the way that it refers to one or more unchangeable and objective properties of the reference profile . Only the transfer of these properties to occurrences outside of the reference profile remains subjective. With the advancement of knowledge in independent auxiliary disciplines such as B. the event stratigraphy , a further specification of the identification of this limit in other outcrops is possible. Future methods not known today can also be used for this purpose.
The GSSP procedure directly defines neither an absolute age nor an absolute time interval. A direct absolute time definition of a chronostratigraphic unit is also not useful because the methods of relative dating currently have a much higher resolution than the radiometric methods of age determination, not least because only certain layers or rock bodies can be dated radiometrically at all. In the course of the application of improved absolute dating methods, it is therefore necessary from time to time to correct the absolute age value of the limit of a certain chronostratigraphic unit (usually by a few hundred thousand to a few million years, with a falling trend).
conditions
Although such a GSSP can in principle be defined at any position in any profile, a good GSSP with a majority in the selection process meets certain requirements. He
is as free of sedimentation gaps as possible in the area around the “golden spike”
is in a stratigraphic position that coincides as closely as possible with an easily recognizable and globally traceable marker
offers a wealth of additional information that can be used for correlation (ideally multiple biostratigraphic as well as magneto- and isotope-stratigraphic markers)
is available and accessible for scientific research
is subject to a certain protection and is thus secured in the long term
if possible depicts a historically established border position
Revision
Once a GSSP has been selected and ratified, it is in principle unchangeable, both geographically and stratigraphically. A new location can only be selected if the original GSSP has been destroyed or is permanently inaccessible. The “golden spike” can be implemented in the reference profile in exceptional cases “if research results obtained after the establishment of a GSSP make this necessary,” but only after a blocking period of at least 10 years. In fact, there is currently a need for revision with some GSSPs, as subsequent examinations of the profile showed that the original demarcation was not optimal ( indicated in the tables below by red font in the column “definition features”).
Biostratigraphically: last relatively frequent occurrence ( highest common occurrence , HCO) of the planktonic foraminifere Chiloguembelina cubensis
Biostratigraphically: last occurrence ( highest occurence , HO) of the coccolith Sphenolithus predistentus (on Monte Cagnero 1 m below the HCO of C. cubensis )
Biostratigraphic: HCO of the coccolith Sphenolithus distentus (on Monte Cagnero 4 m above the HCO of C. cubensis )
Air table: frequency interval of the cold water indicating dinoflagellate cyst Svalbardella cook soniae (Monte Cagnero between the profile meters 201 to 208, which is within the polarity Chrono zone C9N)
Base point: Profile meter 197, 30 cm below a 40 cm thick limestone bank, which scented out in the middle of a 7 m thick, marly interval
potential candidates are locations in south-east France
-
Potential markers are the first appearance of Praediscosphaera columnata ( calcareous nannofossil ), a carbon isotope anomaly (" black shale episode") and an ammonite
Potential markers are the base of the magnetic polarity chronozone M18r, the base of the calpionellid zone B and the first appearance of Berriasella jacobi ( ammonite ).
§“Level” and “platform” are temporary expressions for a better spatial and stratigraphic orientation in the monotonous, unstratified sequence of the reference profile. "Levels" are artificially optically marked and consecutively numbered sections and the "platforms" are the excavated floors in the quarry arranged in steps.
Biostratigraphically: Cardioceras redcliffense horizon at the base of the Cardioceras scarburgense subzone of the Quenstedtoceras mariae - ammonite zone.
Biostratigraphically: first appearance of Dactylioceras (Eodactylites) simplex and / or occurrence of D. (E.) pseudocommune and / or D. (E.) polymorphum as representatives of the lower part of the polymorphum - Ammoniten zone.
Base point: Base of layer 15e at Ponta do Trovão ("Couches de passage" of the highest Lemede formation)
Biostratigraphically: first appearance of Eoprotrachyceras curionii (base of E. curionii - ammonite zone).
Base: Base of a 15–20 cm thick limestone layer, which follows a clearly pronounced layer joint (the so-called Chiesense groove , formed by a layer of limestone nodules in a clay matrix ).
Biostratigraphically: First appearance of the morphotype Streptognathodus isolatus within the chronocline Streptognathodus "wabaunsensis" ( Conodont ).
The most promising candidates are the deep water carbonate sequences of Naqing ( Guizhou , China ) and Verkhnyaya Kardailovka in the southern Urals ( Russia ), decision not expected before 2018
-
Biostratigraphically: First occurrence of the conodont Lochriea ziegleri
Biostratigraphically: originally the base of the Cyrtograptus centrifugus - graptolite zone, which does not (anymore) correspond to the GSSP; The redefinition should be based on conodonts .
Biostratigraphic (imprecise): First appearance of Trichophycus pedum ( trace fossil ), however T. pedum was subsequently detected approx. 4.5 m below the base point.
Base point: 2.4 m above the base of subformation 2 of the Chapel Island Formation
Climatic: rapid retreat of the marine ice sheets and the onset of carbonate sedimentation (so-called " cap carbonates" ), associated with a conspicuous pattern of long-lasting carbon isotope anomalies
Base: Base of the cover carbonate of the Nuccaleena Formation
Felix M. Gradstein, James G. Ogg, Alan G. Smith (Eds.): A Geologic Time Scale 2004 . Cambridge University Press, 2004, ISBN 0-521-78673-8 .
Felix M. Gradstein, James G. Ogg, Mark Schmitz, Gabi Ogg (Eds.): The Geologic Time Scale 2012 . Elsevier BV, 2012, ISBN 978-0-444-59425-9 .
Michael A. Murphy, Amos Salvador (Red.): International Stratigraphic Guide - An abridged version. Episodes. Vol. 22, No. 4, 1999, pp. 255-271 ( online ), pp. 266 ff.
List of all GSSPs defined so far on the ICS website (English) with numerical age, location data, type of stratigraphic marker (s), etc .; a data sheet with further details is linked in the leftmost column, the publication of the ratification in the rightmost column
↑ HD Hedberg (Ed.): International Stratigraphic Guide . J. Wiley, New York 1976.
^ A. Martinsson (Ed.): The Silurian-Devonian Boundary. IUGS Series A, Vol. 5. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart 1977.
^ "[...] if a strong demand arises out of research subsequent to its establishment. But in the meantime it will give a stable point of reference. Normally this stability should be maintained and the practical value of the boundary definition tested for a minimum period of ten years. “Quoted from the Revised guidelines for the establishment of global chronostratigraphic standards by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS) ( Remane et al., 1996 ) in Alan G. Smith, Tiffany Barry, Paul Bown, John Cope, Andy Gale, Philip Gibbard , John Gregory, Mark Hounslow, David Kemp, Robert Knox, John Marshall, Michael Oates, Peter Rawson, John Powell, Colin Waters: GSSPs, global stratigraphy and correlation. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. Vol. 404, 2014, pp. 37–67, doi: 10.1144 / SP404.8 (alternative full text access : ResearchGate )
^ Formal subdivision of the Pleistocene Series / Epoch. Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy 2010, accessed April 1, 2016; actually contained word for word in B. Pillans, P. Gibbard: The Quaternary Period. Pp. 979-1010 in Felix M. Gradstein, James G. Ogg, Mark Schmitz, Gabi Ogg (Eds.): The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Elsevier BV, 2012, ISBN 978-0-444-59425-9 , pp. 987 f.
↑ Gilles S. Odin, Michèle A. Lamaurelle: The global Campanian-Maastrichtian stage boundary. Episodes. Vol. 24, No. 4, 2001, pp. 229–238 ( PDF 350 kB)
↑ a b c Katsumi Ueno & Moscovian-Kasimovian and Kasimovian-Gzhelian boundary task group: 2015 Work plans for the task group to establish the Moscovian-Kasimovian and Kasimovian-Gzhelian boundaries. ICS Subcomission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, 2015 ( PDF 50 kB)
↑ a b Alexander Alekseev & Bashkirian-Moscovianv boundary task group: 2015 Work plans for the task group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary. ICS Subcomission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, 2015 ( PDF 30 kB)
↑ Barry C. Richards & Viséan-Serpukhovian boundary task group: 2015 Work plans for the task group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Viséan-Serpukhovian boundary. ICS Subcomission on Carboniferous Stratigraphy, 2015 ( PDF 60 kB)
↑ Loren E. Babcock, Shanchi Peng, Maoyan Zhu, Shuhai Xiao, Per Ahlberg: Proposed reassessment of the Cambrian GSSP. Journal of African Earth Sciences. Vol. 98, 2014, doi: 10.1016 / j.jafrearsci.2014.06.023 (alternative full text access : ResearchGate ), pp. 3–10