Federal motorway 94

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Template: Infobox high-ranking street / Maintenance / DE-A
Bundesautobahn 94 in Germany
Federal motorway 94
 European Road 552 number DE.svg
map
Course of the A 94
Basic data
Operator: GermanyGermany Federal Republic of Germany
Overall length: 151.4 km
  of which in operation: 102.8 km
  of which under construction: 6.1 km
  of which in planning: 42.5 km

State :

Development condition: mostly four-lane
Course of the road
Free State of Bavaria
Start of expressway Transition off B2 R
tunnel (420 m)  Einsteinstrasse side tunnel
Junction Symbol: Up Munich-Vogelweideplatz
Junction Symbol: rightSymbol: right Munich-Prinzregentenstrasse
Junction (1)  Munich-Steinhausen
Autobahn beginning Start of the Autobahn
Junction (2)  Munich- Zamdorf
Junction (3)  Munich- Daglfing
bridge (60 m)  Railway bridge
Junction (4)  Munich- Am Moosfeld
Junction (5)  Munich- Riem
Junction (6)  Feldkirchen- West
Junction (7)  Feldkirchen-Ost
node (8th)  Kreuz München-Ost A99 E45 E52
Junction (9a)  Parsdorf
Junction (9b)  Market Swabia Symbol: flight
Junction (10)  Anzing
Template: AB / Maintenance / Empty Symbol: tourist Ebersberger Forest
Junction (11)  Forstinning
Junction (12)  Hohenlinden B12
parking spot with toilet Icon: Left RightIcon: Left Right Parking space (with toilet) Holzfeld / Auwiesen
Junction (13)  Pastettes St 2331
bridge (590 m)  Isental Bridge
Junction (14)  Lengdorf
bridge (285 m)  Lappach Valley Bridge
Junction (15)  Villages B15
parking spot with toilet Icon: Left RightIcon: Left Right Parking lot (with toilet) Fürthholz
bridge (420 m)  Goldachtal Bridge
bridge (350 m)  Rimbachtal bridge
bridge (355 m)  Ornauer Bach valley bridge
Junction (16)  Schwindegg
Junction (17)  Hero stone B12
tunnel (680 m)  Wimpasing enclosure
Junction (18)  Waldkraiburg / Ampfing St 2091
Junction (19)  Mühldorf- WestB12
Junction (20)  Mühldorf-North B299 Symbol: truck stop
Template: AB / Maintenance / Empty Symbol: tourist historical town square Mühldorf
Template: AB / Maintenance / Empty Symbol: tourist Massing open-air museum
Junction (21)  Töging
bridge (80 m)  Aubach Bridge
Junction (22)  Altötting B299 B588
bridge (120 m)  Isen Bridge
Junction (23)  Neuötting B588
bridge (470 m)  Inn Bridge Neuötting
Junction (24)  Symbol: Up Neuötting-Ost
bridge (90 m)  Alz Bridge
Template: AB / Maintenance / Empty Symbol: tourist Marktl birthplace of Pope Benedict XVI.
Template: AB / Maintenance / Empty Symbol: tourist Burghausen Castle
Junction (25)  Burghausen B20
Autobahn end Transition in B12 E552
Template: AB / Maintenance / Empty Further construction planned:
bridge (330 m)  Inn Bridge
bridge (110 m)  Türkenbach Bridge
Junction (26)  Stammham B20
parking spot Icon: Left RightIcon: Left Right parking spot
Junction (27)  Simbach -WestB12 E552
Template: AB / Maintenance / Empty Further construction planned:
tunnel (3000 m)  tunnel
Junction Simbach-East
Junction Prienbach-East
parking spot Icon: Left RightIcon: Left Right parking spot
Junction Ering
Autobahn beginning Transition off B12
Junction (30)  Malching St 2116
Autobahn end Transition in B12
Template: AB / Maintenance / Empty Under construction:
tunnel (450 m)  Enclosure
Junction (31)  Kirchham
parking spot with toilet Icon: Left RightIcon: Left Right Parking lot (with toilet)
Junction (32)  Pocking- West / Bad Füssing
tunnel (50 m)  Game passage
Junction (33)  Pocking-Nord / Ruhstorf
node (34)  Cross pocking A3 E56
Start of expressway Transition in B512
  • Under construction
  • In planning
  • Traffic control system
  • Template: AB / Maintenance / Empty Remarks:
    1. Urgent need
    2. a b Further requirements
    3. a b currently as B12dedicated

    The Bundesautobahn 94 (abbreviation: BAB 94 ) - short form: Autobahn 94 (abbreviation: A 94 ) is to connect Munich with Passau . So far the sections Munich – Burghausen and a short section near Malching have been realized . Between Burghausen and Simbach am Inn (14 kilometers), a section with only one two-lane carriageway is in operation as federal highway 12 . However, preliminary work for the further expansion to the A 94 has already been made.

    The route between Forstinning and Heldenstein has been the subject of a debate that has lasted for decades (see section #Train dispute between Pastetten and Heldenstein ).

    history

    The section between Simbach and Passau was not included in the original planning. The A 94 should instead cross the Inn and continue in Austria through the Innviertel to Ried im Innkreis and connect there to the Austrian A 8 in the direction of Vienna . This route would have significantly reduced the travel time from Munich to Vienna compared to the route via Salzburg . Both in Simbach and in Ried, the respective connection points for this planning have already been built. Since Austria did not want to burden the Innviertel with transit traffic, the planning was abandoned by the Austrian side. The German side then decided to connect the A 94 with the A 3 at Pocking / Neuhaus am Inn . This should give the possibility of a northern extension towards the Czech Republic .

    At times, a route from Mühldorf via Pfarrkirchen to Pocking was planned. Today's A 94 section from Mühldorf to Simbach would then have been designated the A 942.

    In December 2012, Federal Transport Minister Ramsauer still assumed that the A 94 would be drivable all the way to Marktl am Inn by 2018. In June 2014, the Southern Bavaria Motorway Directorate announced that in September 2019 the A 94 from Munich to Simbach am Inn should be continuously passable. In fact, the section from Pastetten to Heldenstein was opened on September 30, 2019, and traffic was opened on October 1, 2019.

    Section Munich – Forstinning

    The Munich city entrance of the A 94 was planned in earlier years as the A 992 from the Munich East junction. The first line to be built was the route between Munich-Steinhausen and what was then the Riem airport in the 1960s. The connection between Riem Airport and the Munich-East motorway junction came in the 1970s. Between the Munich-Vogelweideplatz and Feldkirchen-West junctions, it also bears the name "Töginger Straße".

    With the relocation of the New Munich Trade Fair Center to Riem in 1998, the A 94 became the most important access road to the exhibition grounds and corresponding extensions were made: the Munich-Moosfeld exit was rebuilt and the two interchanges at Riem and Feldkirchen- West were expanded. Between Feldkirchen-West and the Munich-East motorway junction , the A 94 was expanded to six lanes. To control the flow of traffic, gantries with variable message signs were set up. The siding of the exhibition grounds crosses the motorway with a newly built bridge; it was put into operation at BAUMA 2001.

    The plans for relocating the Munich-Zamdorf exit to Hultschiner Straße, where the new headquarters of the Süddeutscher Verlag is located, have not been pursued by the City of Munich since 2006.

    The connection of the A 94 to the Mittlerer Ring in Munich was improved by the Richard Strauss Tunnel , which opened in summer 2009 ; a side tunnel leads directly to the start of the A 94 motorway.

    In autumn 2009 the Munich-East motorway junction was expanded. A widening and lengthening of the ramp from the A 94, directional lane Passau – Munich, to the A 99 north is intended to help avoid congestion in this area. This was completed in autumn 2013.

    The Markt Schwaben exit was opened in September 2009 and a connection to Munich Airport was completed in December 2010 via the state road 2580 ( Flughafenentangente Ost ) .

    Section Forstinning to Heldenstein

    End of motorway in Pastetten in 2012
    Construction site Isentalbrücke and junction Lengdorf October 2017

    The continuation of the motorway between Forstinning and Heldenstein has been controversial since the 1970s. In particular, the section between Pastetten and Heldenstein was the subject of a lengthy route dispute (see section #Trassenstreit between Pastetten and Heldenstein ). The route over Dorfen , also called "Isentaltrasse", or a route over Haag , which would have essentially followed the existing route of Bundesstraße 12 , were up for debate .

    In March 2008, after lengthy legal disputes, the construction of the 6.2 kilometer long section between Forstinning and Pastetten, which defined the “Dorfen route”, began. The construction project was initially subject to an outstanding decision by the Federal Administrative Court , which confirmed its legality in December 2008. This section was opened to traffic on August 31, 2011.

    The planning approval decision was made on December 3, 2009 for the 17.4 kilometer section from Pastetten to Dorfen . On November 24, 2010, the Bavarian Administrative Court (VGH) dismissed the claims against this section as unfounded. On December 12, 2012, the Federal Administrative Court upheld the decision of the VGH. The first construction work began on February 29, 2012 in the Lappach area , southwest of Dorfen . The official start of construction for this section was April 13, 2012.

    The end of the motorway at Heldenstein in August 2016. The construction work for the Dorfen-Heldenstein section can be seen in the upper left corner of the picture.

    For the section from Dorfen to Heldenstein, the plan approval decision was made on November 22, 2011. On May 8, 2012, the plaintiffs against the plan approval decision reached an amicable court with the Autobahn Directorate South Bavaria, which meant the final acquisition of building rights. Construction on this section began on February 5, 2016. The largest structure is the Isental Bridge, almost 600 meters long. The almost completed bridge over the Ornaubach had to be partially demolished and rebuilt in the meantime due to construction defects. A total of 14 kilometers of noise protection wall will be built up.

    The opening for both jointly built sections was on September 30, 2019. The traffic was opened one day later, on October 1, 2019. Both sections will be built and operated as a public-private partnership model (PPP) (see section #Realization of a section as a PPP project ).

    Speed ​​limitation to 120 km / h: shortly after the road was opened, complaints from residents about high noise pollution increased. As a result, the Bavarian state government decided at the beginning of 2020 to introduce a temporary speed limit of 120 km / h from February 1, 2020 until noise measurements and a noise protection report have been carried out. In addition, a review of the road surface used and the construction of noise protection systems were announced. Against this speed limit there is also resistance.

    Section Heldenstein to Ampfing

    The subsequent section from Heldenstein to Ampfing was granted building rights on August 8, 2008 with the planning approval decision of the government of Upper Bavaria. The official start of construction was August 7, 2009. The 4.3 km long construction section was built with the standard cross-section 26 (RQ 26). The route runs through a water protection area on a 2.8 km long section. Because of the local proximity to the residential development near Wimpasing, it was enclosed in this area over a length of 680 m.

    On February 14, 2012, the Bavarian Environment Minister and Mühldorf member of the state parliament, Marcel Huber, announced that exit  18 would be named Waldkraiburg / Ampfing . Waldkraiburg , as a more important place in terms of traffic, and Ampfing, over whose municipal area the motorway runs, had each claimed the name for themselves. This double name contradicts the regulations of the Federal Ministry of Transport , but this has agreed to this designation.

    The section was inaugurated on December 3, 2012 and opened to traffic the day after. The provisional traffic routes were dismantled by mid-2013; there was also final work on municipal streets and paths.

    The planning for this section assumed a traffic load of 43,800 vehicles per day for 2020. In 2016, the daily traffic volume at the automatic counting point Wimpasing (9984; A94) was 21,964 vehicles (of which heavy traffic 4,319 vehicles).

    Section Ampfing to Marktl

    From Ampfing further east, the motorway to the Burghausen / Marktl junction is also completed for over 30 kilometers.

    Bypassing Malching

    At Malching, a 5.8-kilometer section has already been implemented as a bypass Malching, but like the section from Marktl to Simbach, initially only two lanes have been expanded and has been in operation since October 2009 as part of federal highway 12. Construction of the second carriageway began on October 9, 2012. The four-lane expansion was opened to traffic on November 28, 2013 and reclassified to A 94.

    New construction and expansion planning

    Expansion of Munich-Steinhausen to Feldkirchen-West

    In the Federal Transport Infrastructures Plan 2030 , the three-lane expansion for each lane of the section between Munich- Steinhausen and Feldkirchen- West is provided for when there is an urgent need to remove bottlenecks .

    Expansion of the Munich-East motorway junction

    According to a newspaper article published in November 2017, an expansion of the Munich-East motorway junction (junction with the A 99 ) with two semi-direct connecting ramps is under discussion.

    Expansion of the Munich-East motorway junction to Markt Schwaben

    According to BVWP 2030, this section is also planned for a six-lane expansion. The project runs under Urgent Needs - Bottleneck Elimination .

    Continuation from Marktl to the A 3

    In the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030, the entire section of the A 94 from Marktl to the A 3 to Pocking (excluding the already completed section at Malching and the section at Tutting, which is permanently and permanently planned ) is included in the urgent need.

    Section Marktl to Simbach

    From Marktl to Simbach, the route was initially only built with two lanes over a length of 17 kilometers, but has already been prepared for a four-lane expansion. This connection is currently in operation as federal highway 12.

    Section Simbach to Kühstein

    For the 15 kilometer long section between Simbach and Malching, which was originally classified as a further requirement in the 2003 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan, the route definition was completed, but no further steps were taken. After the section has been upgraded to the urgent needs of the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030, the start of construction has come closer.

    Malching to Kirchham section

    An initial plan approval procedure for the six kilometers to Kirchham (Tutting junction) following the Malching bypass was discontinued due to objections, the plans revised and reopened on March 25, 2013. The procedure was completed with the planning approval decision of August 27, 2015 by the government of Lower Bavaria. The new four-lane construction of this section is classified in the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 as firmly planned. Construction began on July 26, 2016. Due to the construction of a tunnel, a construction period of approx. 6 years is Template: future / in 2 yearsexpected.

    Section Kirchham to Pocking

    The 12.3 kilometer section from Kirchham to the Pocking junction, which will be expanded to become the Pocking motorway junction, was originally intended to be built from 2012. The plan approval procedure was only initiated on July 19, 2012. Since there were objections in the hearing, changes to the plan were made with regard to compensation areas, flood areas and road connections (architectural plan of March 10, 2016). This made additional public participation necessary, which is why the documents were again available for inspection in the communities of Kirchham, Bad Füssing, Neuhaus am Inn, the market in Ruhstorf an der Rott and the city of Pocking. The planning approval decision for this section was issued on July 19, 2018.

    Continuation towards the Czech border

    A continuation of the A 94 north of Passau in the direction of the Czech border is planned. The A 94 is to be connected to the Czech motorway (expressway until 2015) Dálnice 4 in the direction of Prague . However, neither the German nor the Czech side have specific plans to continue the two roads through the Bavarian and Bohemian Forest . Currently, an average of just 4600 vehicles (including 520 heavy goods vehicles) cross the Philippsreut border crossing each day . In addition, there are considerable problems under nature conservation law: both on the German and the Czech side, landscape and nature reserves would be crossed, and in some cases even national parks would be affected.

    costs

    total cost

    In order to make the autobahn to Marktl passable by 2018, annual funds of 70 million euros were deemed necessary in 2011. Extrapolated over eight years, this results in a total of 490 million euros. As of November 2011, the funds pledged for a subsequent period of two years through a collective household title amounted to EUR 40 million for preparatory work and property purchases.

    Costs according to BVWP 2030

    The cost estimate for a four-lane new construction / expansion in the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 on the route from the Forstinning junction to the Marktl junction is 539.4 million euros. An additional 231.2 million euros will be used for the preservation. In addition, an additional 485.6 million euros for expansion and new construction (N4 + E4) and 40.3 million euros for maintenance and replacement measures are set aside for the area from the Munich East motorway junction to the Pocking junction.

    Overall, the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2030 puts the costs for the two as fixed (851.5 million euros) and the two projects classified as urgent (572.9 million euros) at 1.4 billion euros.

    Costs per construction phase

    Between 2009 and August 1, 2017, the costs outside the PPP project for the Forstinning area to Marktl rose from 38.5 million euros (budget adjustment) by 209 percent to 118.9 million euros (costs of the road construction plan).

    Forstinning after pastettes

    In the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan of 2003, 26.9 million euros were budgeted for the section. The cost in the end was around 50 million euros. This corresponds to a cost increase of 86 percent.

    Pastettes according to Heldenstein

    The Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003 contained the following cost estimates for the two projects listed as alternative 1 as urgent:

    • Pastetten-Dorfen: 128.2 million euros
    • Dorfen-Heldenstein: 119.5 million euros

    Thus, in 2003, total costs of 247.7 million euros were expected. The financing for the construction of Pastetten according to Heldenstein was still unclear regardless of the planning approval decisions in 2011, as cost increases could not be ruled out. The opponents of the Isental motorway were already expecting considerable cost increases and start-up financing in the order of several hundred million euros in June 2013. From December 2012 to April 2015 construction costs of 350 million euros were in the room. As of November 2015, the Southern Bavaria Autobahn Directorate assumed total costs of 400 million euros. In 2016 they amount to 440 million euros. This corresponds to a cost increase of 77.6 percent compared to 2003.

    In 2013, it was only possible to secure the financing of the Lappachtal Bridge. The cost of the bridge is 13.2 million euros.

    Heldenstein to Ampfing

    The total cost was around 70 million euros. The housing at Wimpasing had a share of 22 million euros (shell: 15 million euros, equipment: 7 million euros). In the 2003 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan, only 49.2 million euros were originally set for this section of the route. Thus the cost increase is 42 percent.

    Ampfing to Marktl

    The Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003 contained the following cost estimates for the projects classified as urgent:

    • Ampfing – Erharting: 44 million euros
    • Erharting – Winhöring: 39.1 million euros

    Thus, in 2003, the total costs for these sections were estimated at EUR 83.1 million.

    Simbach to Kühstein

    The Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003 contained the following cost estimates for the three listed projects:

    • Simbach West – Simbach East: 90.1 million euros
    • Simbach Ost – Prienbach Ost: 23.4 million euros
    • Prienbach Ost – Malching: 20.5 million euros

    Thus, in 2003, total costs of EUR 134 million were expected.

    Bypassing Malching

    The Malching bypass cost a total of 38 million euros. The cost of the second lane was 10 million euros.

    Malching to Kirchham

    The costs are set at EUR 81 million in the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan. The total costs of the Malching bypass and this section from Malching to Tutting are thus 119 million euros; the proportion of the four-lane bypass at Malching, which is already under traffic, is 38 million euros. The costs are 27 percent higher than the 2003 Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan of 93.9 million euros.

    Cost development
    Route section Costs according to BVWP 2003 current project costs Increase in costs
    Forstinning after pastettes € 26.9 million € 50 million + 86%
    Pastettes according to Heldenstein € 247.7 million € 440 million + 77.6%
    Heldenstein to Ampfing € 49.2 million € 70 million + 42%
    Ampfing to Marktl € 83.1 million ? ?
    Simbach to Kühstein € 134 million ? ?
    Bypass Malching +
    Malching to Kirchham
    € 93.3 million € 119 million + 27%
    Kirchham to Pocking

    In the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003, this section was estimated at a cost of EUR 73.2 million. In 2015, no budget was set to start construction. Completion before 2019 therefore seems unlikely.

    Alternative route via Haag i. IF

    The cost estimate for this variant at the end of 2011 was 30 million euros lower than for the Isental route.

    Costs for the downstream road network

    In addition to the direct costs caused by the construction of the A 94 itself, there were also costs for the expansion and conversion of the downstream transport network in order to achieve better transport links to the A 94. These include B. Costs associated with the district roads Mü 25, Mü 30 and Mü 40.

    Traffic volume

    In 2016 there were a total of five automatic counting points along the A 94. In the west-east direction, the average daily traffic volume during this period was:

    Counting point Motor vehicle traffic / day 2015 Heavy traffic / day 2015 Motor vehicle traffic / day 2016 Heavy traffic / day 2016
    Munich-Riem (W) (9985) 66,655 3.223 66,849 3,268
    Munich-Riem (O) (9986) 65,133 3,291 --- ---
    Feldkirchen-Ost (W) (9987) 57,642 3.158 --- ---
    AK Munich-East (O) (9840) --- --- --- ---
    Wimpasing (9984) 20,459 3,937 21,964 4,319

    Trivia

    Line dispute between Pastetten and Heldenstein

    Since the 1970s, there has been disagreement about the route on the section between Forstinning and Heldenstein. The "Haag route" and the "Dorfen route", also known as the "Isental route", were up for debate. While the federal highway 12, which runs basically parallel to the autobahn from Munich to Altötting, runs a little further south via Haag, the Bavarian state government favored a 2.5 km shorter route further north via Dorfen and through the Isental . However, the announcement that the autobahn through Isental would be built sparked violent protests from all parties from the start. The alternative route near Haag would have provided for a gradual expansion of the B 12.

    A regional planning procedure in 1977 came to the conclusion that only the route through the Isental was suitable. In 1985, the government of Upper Bavaria determined in an analysis of the protected property that “for all seven protected goods or protection goals on which the overall comparison was based, the Haag route was clearly more favorable [...] than the Dorfen route”. A second regional planning procedure on June 11, 1991 (file number 800-8255) showed that both routes were suitable for a four-lane traffic connection.

    The Upper Bavarian Government , which is responsible for approving motorway planning , the Supreme Building Authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior , for Construction and Transport and the Southern Bavaria Motorway Directorate then followed the route through Dorfen. The main argument is the heavy traffic on the B 12 with sections of well over 25,000 vehicles per day, which, according to forecasts, should increase to 35,000 to 55,000 vehicles per day in 2015. In addition, the Dorfen route is around 2.9 kilometers shorter than the Haag route.

    The opponents of the Dorfen route were the citizens' initiative action group , which had existed since the 1970s, against the A 94 and the communities in Isental, which were supported by the nature conservation association and numerous artists. Your arguments in favor of the Haag route and against the Isental route initially took on the Isental as one of the last, large-scale and uncut natural and cultural areas in Upper Bavaria . In the 1990s and 2000s, however, a number of other political arguments were brought up against the Isental route: for example, since 2010, based on an expert opinion by the Vieregg & Rössler transport consultancy, the Dorfen route was twice as expensive with a total cost of around 400 million euros become like the Hague route. The Federal Ministry of Transport also assumed this amount in 2011. According to this report, the future connection of the planned four-lane federal highway 15 to the Haag route is also much cheaper and gentler than would be the case if the Dorfen route were implemented.

    In the Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003 , both route variants were found to be urgently needed. However, only the Dorfen route was explicitly listed with a cost estimate. This and the Haag route should therefore be weighed against each other during the planning approval procedure.

    On January 17, 2003, the Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig ruled after a lawsuit brought by the action group against Isentaltrasse that the Bavarian Administrative Court had to allow the state development plan to be examined in a court hearing. The lawsuits of the four communities Lengdorf, Dorfen, Buch am Buchrain and Pastetten were dismissed in the course of 2003, the lawsuits of 23 private individuals and the lawsuit of the Bund Naturschutz remained . On April 8, 2005, a judgment was to be made, but it was postponed due to a pending judgment of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), which was supposed to clarify legal questions regarding the Fauna-Flora-Habitat-Guidelines (FFH). In the meantime, the Administrative Court has imposed a construction freeze. On September 14, 2006, the assessment of the FFH protection for this area was returned to the national courts by the European Court of Justice. Accordingly, three potentially affected areas are to be treated as legally valid protection areas, in which no interventions are permitted that could "seriously affect them."

    After supplementing the planning approval decision, which was supposed to avoid these serious impairments, the Bavarian Administrative Court negotiated again in autumn 2007 about the planned motorway. The latter rejected the complaints of the remaining plaintiffs, thus confirmed the section from Forstinning to Pastetten and no longer allowed an appeal to the Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG). After the written judgment was presented in March 2008, the action group filed a non-admission complaint with the BVerwG against Isentaltrasse . On December 16, 2008, the BVerwG rejected this. This gave building rights for the Forstinning – Pastetten section.

    On May 3, 2008, the citizens' initiative gathered over 2000 people near Dorfen to demonstrate against the route together with Biermösl Blosn and cabaret artist Gerhard Polt . On May 23, 2009 this event was repeated, this time 5000 visitors appeared.

    In a ruling on November 24, 2010, the Bavarian Administrative Court rejected claims by the Federal Nature Conservation Association, the hunting association and seven property owners against the construction of the Pastetten – Dorfen section. An appeal against the judgment was not allowed. The option of filing a non-admission complaint with the Federal Administrative Court was open; the non-admission complaints were dismissed by the Federal Administrative Court on December 9, 2011. After the court decision, the “Aktiongemeinschaft gegen die Isentalautobahn” announced that after 34 years of resistance the “judicial process was obviously over”. Since a plan approval procedure for the Dorfen route had now taken place, it was announced that it would instead fight politically. On May 8, 2012, the plaintiffs reached an amicable agreement in court against the planning approval decision in the section between Dorfen and Heldenstein. Thus, there was a final building permit for this section as well.

    Realization of a section as a PPP project

    Peter Ramsauer , Federal Minister of Transport from 2009 to 2013 , announced in 2012 that the new building in the Pastetten to Heldenstein section would be tendered as part of a public-private partnership model . The costs for construction, operation, maintenance and partial financing are transferred to one or more private operators. The construction consortium receives start-up funding and a monthly availability fee for 30 years. There are no direct payments from the truck toll as in other PPP projects, as these "are too difficult for companies to calculate". The two structures already under construction will be transferred to the consortium.

    On November 24, 2015, a consortium of bidders "Isentalautobahn GbR" was awarded the contract. The contract period is 30 years. The consortium consists of the following companies:

    • the construction company Berger Bau from Passau,
    • the company BAM PPP A-Modell Holding GmbH, a subsidiary of the Dutch Royal BAM , and
    • the French construction company Eiffage S.A.

    It is scheduled to take over operations on the Isental route on November 1, 2019. If this deadline is not reached, contractual penalties may apply. The operating company's depot will later be built in Ampfing. The ARGE is currently based in Dorfen.

    The PPP project itself not only includes the construction of the Pastetten to Heldenstein section, but also the maintenance of the 77 km long route from Forstinning to Marktl. The same consortium was also given responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the 77 km long motorway section between Forstinning and Marktl for the next 30 years. The total award volume thus amounts to 1.1 billion euros. If the motorway is not available during the contract period, contractual penalties will also be due.

    Motorway maintenance depots

    As of January 1, 2016, the responsibilities for the A 94 were as follows:

    • in the area of ​​the Munich-Steinhausen junction (1) and the Pastetten junction (13) at the Hohenbrunn motorway maintenance facility,
    • in the area of ​​junction Waldkraiburg / Ampfing (18) and junction Burghausen (25) at the Traunstein / Neuötting motorway maintenance facility.

    Movie

    • Home: Destroyed - The Isental motorway A94. Documentary, Germany, 2015, 5:42 min., Written and directed by Jan Haft , production: nautilusfilm, online video by the Gregor Louis or environmental foundation .

    Web links

    Commons : Bundesautobahn 94  - Collection of pictures, videos and audio files

    Individual evidence

    1. a b innsalzach24.de: “A 94 has the highest priority” , December 3, 2012, online at www.innsalzach24.de, accessed on October 7, 2017.
    2. a b c innsalzach24.de: A 94 should be ready in September 2019 , June 4, 2014, online at www.innsalzach24.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    3. Controversial A94 opening: Scheuer invites all citizens to celebrate - but three do not adhere to it. merkur.de , September 30, 2019, accessed October 1, 2019 .
    4. ^ Munich Wiki: Töginger Strasse . Munich Wiki. August 19, 2014. Retrieved September 1, 2014.
    5. Traffic concept for the east of Munich. (No longer available online.) City of Munich, February 16, 2006, archived from the original on April 16, 2008 ; Retrieved May 25, 2015 .
    6. Finally: The Richard Strauss Tunnel is inaugurated . merkur-online.de. July 18, 2009. Retrieved September 28, 2009.
    7. Press release M27 / 09 (PDF; 494 kB) Motorway Directorate South Bavaria. August 10, 2009. Retrieved September 28, 2009.
    8. Press release 86/2008: A 94 motorway may be built in the Forstinning-Pastetten section. Federal Administrative Court, December 16, 2008, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    9. https://www.rosenheim24.de/bayern/499-euro-fuerneues-stueckerl-a94-teilstueck-1384903.html
    10. File number: 32-4354.1-A 94-6: Plan approval decision A 94 Munich – Pocking, Pastetten – Dorfen section, new building from km 16 + 980 to km 34 + 423. (PDF) Government of Upper Bavaria, December 3, 2009, accessed on May 26, 2015 . - Overview map in addition . PDF. Online at www.regierung.oberbayern.bayern.de. Retrieved May 26, 2015.
    11. Defeat for opponents of the Isental route. sueddeutsche.de, November 24, 2010, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    12. eAUTOBAHN: A 94 start of construction Pastetten – Dorfen , online at www.eautobahn.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    13. Message from the South Bavaria Motorway Directorate of February 27, 2012 (PDF; 59 kB)
    14. The A 94 continues to grow. Passauer Neue Presse, April 13, 2012, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    15. Government gives the green light to close the gap on the A 94 (between Dorfen and Heldenstein). merkur-online.de, November 24, 2011, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    16. Green light to close the gap: Hillenbrand: The door to the A 94 is open! Wochenblatt, November 24, 2011, accessed on May 25, 2015 .
    17. Motorway A 94 may continue to be built. sueddeutsche.de, November 24, 2011, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    18. Press release No. 232 - A 94: Clear the way for Trasse Dorfen - Amicable settlement in the last lawsuit. (No longer available online.) Government of Upper Bavaria, May 8, 2012, archived from the original on May 25, 2015 ; Retrieved May 25, 2015 .
    19. ^ Amicable agreement in the last lawsuit - A 94: Clear the way for Trasse Dorfen. Wochenblatt, May 8, 2012, accessed May 25, 2015 .
    20. Isentalautobahn: There is no free money for further construction. merkur-online.de, April 1, 2011, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    21. Honestly just a slip of the tongue? A94 will not be completed until 2090 Innsalzach24, February 5, 2016, accessed on February 24, 2016.
    22. Construction error on the Isental motorway: some of the bridge has to be demolished again
    23. Bridge has to be partly demolished (with pictures) ( Memento from June 27, 2018 in the Internet Archive )
    24. a b c Süddeutsche Zeitung: 33 kilometers of motorway are being built here , September 13, 2016, online at www.sueddeutsche.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    25. https://www.innsalzach24.de/innsalzach/region-muehldorf/heldenstein-ort62343/landkreis-muehldorf-bestaetigt-a94-heldenstein-pastetten-wird-ende-september-freigierter-12968494.html
    26. Landshuter Zeitung: Söder wants speed limit on Isental motorway, January 10, 2020.
    27. Landshuter Zeitung: Petition against Tempo 120 on A 94, January 15, 2020.
    28. a b Autobahn Directorate South Bavaria: Information on the construction of the A 94, Heldenstein - Ampfing , lecture from February 26, 2009 in Mühldorf (PDF; 1.3 MB), online at www.abdsb.bayern.de, accessed on October 7, 2017 .
    29. a b c d e f Motorway Directorate South Bavaria: Federal Motorway A 94 Munich – Pocking (A 3), new building between Heldenstein and Ampfing , PDF, online at www.abdsb.bayern.de, accessed on October 7, 2017.
    30. a b A94: the first kilometers in Lower Bavaria open to traffic. Wochenblatt Pfarrkirchen-Rottal / Inn, November 28, 2013, accessed on November 28, 2013 .
    31. ^ Kreuz München Ost - The A94 is to be expanded from six to ten lanes. SZ-Online , October 11, 2017, accessed April 6, 2018 .
    32. Press release 110/2013 - New planning documents for the A 94 motorway. Government of Lower Bavaria, March 25, 2013, accessed on March 27, 2013 .
    33. Thomas Röll: A94 is a little longer again . Bayernkurier. July 26, 2016. Retrieved July 26, 2016.
    34. ^ Passauer Neue Presse: A94 section near Kirchham: The groundbreaking ceremony is planned for July. In: Pocking & Bad Füssing & Bad Griesbach - newspaper - news. Retrieved April 22, 2016 .
    35. Press release 239/2012: Plans for the construction of the A 94 between Kirchham and Pocking are laid out. Government of Lower Bavaria, July 19, 2012, accessed May 25, 2015 .
    36. ^ Passauer Neue Presse: A94: Changed plans in the Kirchham-Pocking section. In: Pocking & Bad Füssing & Bad Griesbach - newspaper - news. Retrieved April 24, 2016 .
    37. Passauer Neue Presse: A94 near Pocking: There is building permission for a section over 12 kilometers long. Retrieved July 23, 2018 .
    38. http://www.regierung.niederbayern.bayern.de/service/presse/archiv/2018/pm2018202.php
    39. German traffic figures database
    40. innsalzach24.de: More money for the A94? , November 5, 2011, online at www.insalzach24.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    41. German Bundestag response of the federal government to the minor question from MPs Stephan Kühn (Dresden), Sven-Christian Kindler, Annalena Baerbock, other MPs and the Alliance 90 / DIE GRÜNEN parliamentary group - printed matter 18/13197 - financing of the road needs plan in the 2017 budget year . PDF. Printed matter 18/13328, August 16, 2017, accessed on July 15, 2018.
    42. Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing: Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003. Basics for the future of mobility in Germany. (PDF; 3.5 MB) German Bundestag, accessed on October 24, 2012 (resolution of the Federal Government of July 2, 2003; published as printed matter 15/2050 of the German Bundestag on November 17, 2003).
    43. ^ A 94: From September 1st, traffic will roll. merkur-online.de, August 12, 2011, accessed on May 26, 2015 : "In total, the project cost almost 50 million euros."
    44. a b c Florian Tempel: Isentalautobahn - cost explosion during the construction of the A 94. sueddeutsche.de, August 30, 2011, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    45. a b Münchner Merkur: Lappachtalbrücke "Symbol for a failed transport policy" , June 2, 2013, online at www.merkur.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    46. a b innsalzach24.de: A94 is privately financed. , December 4, 2012, online at www.innsalzach24.de, accessed on October 7, 2017.
    47. Alt-Neuöttinger Anzeiger: A94: The completion is tangible. pnp.de, April 24, 2015, accessed November 2, 2015 .
    48. wochenblatt.de: Isentalautobahn: Costs of over a billion are "a big misunderstanding" , March 6, 2014, online at www.wochenblatt.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    49. a b Press release 60/15: A 94 Munich – Pocking (A3), new building between Pastetten and Heldenstein, order placed with successful bidder. (PDF) Autobahn Directorate South Bavaria, November 24, 2015, accessed on November 24, 2015 .
    50. a b c Süddeutsche Zeitung: Fences for frogs, flight aid for bats , November 14, 2016, online at www.sueddeutsche.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    51. ^ A b Süddeutsche Zeitung: Mondlandschaft am Schwammerl , April 15, 2013, online at www.sueddeutsche.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    52. German Bundestag: Answer of the Federal Government to the minor question from the MPs Stephan Kühn (Dresden), Dr. Valerie Wilms, Oliver Krischer, other MPs and the parliamentary group BÜNDNIS 90 / DIE GRÜNEN - Drucksache 18/5832 . PDF. Printed matter 18/5989, September 14, 2015, online at dip21.bundestag.de, accessed on October 2, 2016.
    53. A94: Free travel at Pocking will probably only be possible in 2019. Passauer Neue Presse, March 13, 2015, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    54. innsalzach24.de: More money for the A94? , November 5, 2011, online at www.innsalzach.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    55. innsalzach24.de: Better connection to the A 94 , October 8, 2011, online at www.insalzach24.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    56. bast - Federal Highway Research Institute: Automatic counting points 2015 - A 94 and Automatic counting points 2015 - A 94 , online at www.bast.de, accessed on October 7, 2017.
    57. See for example Der Spiegel 40/1986
    58. File number 831-8604-BAB-2/85
    59. ↑ Planning approval decision for the A 94
    60. arguments. Bund Naturschutz in Bayern e. V. - Action group against the Isental motorway, accessed on September 30, 2013 .
    61. Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003 p. 89.
    62. ECJ ruling on FFH areas in Isental, case C-244/05 (PDF document; 97 kB)
    63. VGH website, press release from September 25, 2007
    64. Jura forum: BayVGH: Isental-A 94 may be built
    65. A94 not in Isental - What happened so far ...
    66. ^ Federal Administrative Court: BVerwG website, press release from December 16, 2008 ( Memento from July 3, 2009 in the Internet Archive ). Online at www.bundesverwaltungsgericht.de.
    67. The CSU in need - 50 percent minus X ; Article by Max Hägler in the taz
    68. ^ Anton Renner: Major musical attack against the A94 in Isental. merkur-online.de, May 25, 2009, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    69. ^ Lawsuits against Isental-Autobahn A 94 unsuccessful in the second construction phase. (PDF; 44 kB) Bavarian Administrative Court, November 24, 2010, accessed on May 26, 2015 .
    70. a b Action group against the Isental motorway: Press release on the VGH decision on November 24, 2010 (PDF; 11 kB) , accessed on November 24, 2010
    71. innsalzach24.de: Section of A 94 released , December 3, 2012, online at www.innsalzach24.de, accessed on October 7, 2017.
    72. a b Münchner Merkur: A 94: The largest construction site in Bavaria by 2019 , February 4, 2016, online at www.merkur.de, accessed on October 8, 2017.
    73. Groundbreaking in February: A 94 expansion goes into the final phase . innsalzach24.de, November 24, 2015, accessed on February 15, 2016 .
    74. Supreme building authority in the Bavarian State Ministry of the Interior, for construction and traffic: Free State of Bavaria - Road overview map - Responsibilities of the motorway maintenance authorities . PDF. January 1, 2016, online at www.baysis.bayern.de, accessed on September 17, 2016.